Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer. If you decide to continue your subscription, you’ll get a 50% discount bit.ly/CasualHistorian_mh
Sorry for leaving a comment here, but I wanted to get your attention. So get this - my great grandpa, a Sephardic Jew from Jerusalem, was actually a childhood friend of Husseini’s. As far as I know, the last contact the two had was sometime after 1935. Due to Ottoman restrictions, one’s neighbour’s consent was required to sell property. Husseini, not wanting to be seeing allowed to sell land to Jews, Vetoed a sell of land next to the Damascus gate. My great grandpa walked up to him, remined him who he was, and suggested a way in which it would appear as though the sell would be done to Christian hands, as opposed to Jewish. Husseini agreed. If you are interested and able to contact me, I have a few more tales of Jerusalem and Mandatory Palestine during that time. One question - why haven’t you mentioned the massive influx of Arab immigrants to the land during British and late Turkish rule?
@Casualhistorian if you are reading this, do research about the biafara kingdom in west Africa, long time before the colonization era and long before 11th centuries.. The modern time of biafra is coming. And who are the biafrans ?!
Excellent video, but there is a small error at 45:30, when you speak about the situation in Europe, and that Hitler gained absolut power after the death of the German President Erich Ludendorf. Which is of course wrong, the last president of the Weimar era was the former General Paul von Hindenburg. Who during WWI, together with Ludendorf, had defeated the Russians at the Battle of Tannenberg, and during the latter part of the war had been the de facto rulers of Germany. After the war they parted ways. Living for a short stint in Sweden, Ludendorf returned to Germany and got embroiled in various right wing groups, and gravitated towards NSDAP. After taking part in Hitler's failed Beerhall Putsch in 1923, he would later brake with Hitler and the NSDAP. Forming his own party and - together with his wife - delve deep into Germanic mysticism and esoterism, and at the early part of the 1930, he managed to revive his relation with Hindenburg.
There is no such place as "Palestine." The land belongs to the Jews. "Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?" (Psalm 2:1, KJV). Even so, come, Lord Jesus! Establish the Kingdom in Jerusalem and save the world from the tyranny of Democracy (Daniel 7:7, KJV)!
@@nkristianschmidt right? The only nation on earth that has been able to and even assisted by world governments in replacing an entire land belonging to others because of fairy tales. Edit, no I don’t take sides, both Jews and Muslims cause more problems than any other groups in the world because of their attachments to fairy tales. Those who are secular, i.e. don’t believe in fantasies or think they or others like them are better because of their beliefs in fairy tales or being born from special wombs, contribute immensely to society. Christians are tolerable because they massively reformed through Protestantism. Catholicism is more cancerous. Sincerely the world would be better if they all got their own planet to fight it out and let the rest of us get in with it. We’d still have problems but they wouldn’t be so predictably insidious and depend on other people being attached to fantasies.
@@chaiam Historical details are important to study and research for each judgement call we ask our selves to make. Very much the same as when a verdict is made in a court case.
@@nkristianschmidtYou can find REAL historical details on Wikipedia with references cited. It was Jewish land before and for much longer than it was Muslim. Arabs didn’t even enter the land until the Romans let them after they kicked out the Jews for too many uprisings. Quit being lazy and research it for yourself. It takes five minutes and you won’t look like an idiot next to you write a comment like that.
There’s absolutely no way anyone could have any disagreement on this topic. This is the one topic that everyone agrees on. No differing opinions on Israeli history
The video was amazingly informative and objective. Really hope you make many more video like this covering all the early/middle history of Israel, since you're one of the very rare channels making trustworthy content about the topic
Amazingly objective? Everything he quotes from the Jewish perspective was patient and understanding and about how they didn’t want to take Arab lands. Yet every single Arab quote, document, and perspective is also about wiping out the Jews or killing them or negative. That doesn’t seem so objective to me. It seems pretty biased. Where’s the information and ramle and lydda? Where is the details about jaffa and deir Yassin?
@@ScottBub this video ended way before the 1948 war arabs declared. Deir yassin happened in that war. It would be very wierd to bring that up in this video then.
I asked my grandfather “Wasn’t it a good thing J€w$ & Israel gained their independence so their people can finally have a place to go in peace!” He just got mad and start cursing me out!! What was that all about?? Now he won’t even talk to me….
25:45 is such an interesting point. I've long wondered why the Palestinian issue is so deeply important to Muslims around the world, and I knew the religious significance of Jerusalem was one aspect, but its weird I've never realized how odd the fixation on Jerusalem is when the city hasn't been all thay important in the Grand Arc of Islamic history. Practically speaking, and not trying to offend anyone, but it seems like the role of Jerusalem in Islam is mostly to tie it to Christianity and Judaism as an Abrahamic religion than anything else.
As a Muslim I think that the presenter here is relying on not so accurate sources in this regard which is understandable for me. There's a lot of confusion and misunderstanding when talking about Islam, and when it's about islam and the Palestinian question, oh boy! What is really important for me is to make clear that the presenter is underestimating how important Jerusalem is for the Muslims. It's importance is in Quran and in Sunnah, which is the preaching of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. The only city Caliph Omar visited upon controlling it by Muslim armies is Jerusalm. During Omars Caliph Muslim armies opened Persia, egypt and the levant but only Jerusalem was paid a visit by the caliph, this is to show how categorically wrong to play down the importance of Jerusalem and Palestine to the muslims and also to show that its importance is not stimming from AlHusaini's propaganda.
Every Muslim man, woman and child in the Islamic world is our family member and if one dies on our notice, we will yell for the world to notice our brothers and sisters' lives taken unjustly.
@@מ.מ-ה9ד we'll, that's one theory among many - not a proven fact. Fact remains that these ancient Hebrews were known as "ivrim", meaning they "crossed over" from somewhere. Bible says it was from Ur, and they probably crossed over the Jordan river. Only thing left of the Canaanite's today is a pretty ugly dog.
@@banto1 It does not mean "crossed over", it means "located over". I digress. That's an amazing dog, and every Jew has at least some direct Cannanite genetics and traditions.
@@מ.מ-ה9ד Well, the family did come to settle in Canaan and they weren't going to go full redneck and marry their sisters were they? So, yah, there is a Canaanite DNA in the mix for sure, as well as lots of other stuff from local tribes (midianite, edomite, amorite, etc...) as mentioned in the good book. (and that dog is still ugly by current dog standards).
At 77, a lifetime of hearing of the oppression and repression of the Arabs by the Jews in the Levant and knowing the truth, this production is a valuable addition to my library. Thank you for your time and effort.
The Palestinians didn't just hate the Jews they even hated their own kind. That's why the Druze who lived there sided with the Israelis, they were tired of being treated like shit by the Muslims. Even today Israel is by far the best country for Druze to live in because it's the only country in that region that allows them to practice their religion in peace
Excellent video, the history of israel and palestine is very difficult to study, especially considering its history is constantly being rewritten to suit a sides particular narrative. Most people think the history starts in 1948 when in reality the conflict spans back into the early 1900s. Even back in the 1800s the population of palestine was only a quarter of a million, most of the arabs not unlike the jews were refugees, from all over the middle east.
No the palestinian are mostly, like all levantine people, descendant of semitic people who descend from ancient canaan like the jews. Their history can be like this, they were jews and samaritains convert to Christianity and who spoke greek and amaraic at the Time of the roman empire. Jews always lived there and had a remaining presence till the genocidal first crusade. When the arabs conquered the levant, they were a minority in those conquered land and they didnt replace the population, but they ruled them. The population became majority muslim and arabic in a assimilation process that lasted centuries. So yeah Palestinians have a pretty good claim to the land like the jews. Its also a more effective one in my view since they pretty much always lived there. Of course through 2000 years the Palestine was a land of immigration and emmigration, pretty much like all country and nation in the mediteranean. They were always there.
Dude , the Palestinians being refuges claim was already debunked, Palestinians are native to Palestine and the Levant , they have been living in Palestine for centuries, The land wasn’t poorly populated, but that’s how the whole Arab world was, the whole greater syria had 3,000,000 , and Palestinian with nearly 700,000 in 1900 was one of the most populous.
@sirialexa9001 U can keep telling yourself more lies, that won’t change the fact that there are Palestinian people and they are recognized by the international law, they have a flag,an anthem,a recognized territory, a government and everything else needed for a group of people to be a nation.
Happy your channel was suggested to me...YT is currently flooded with anything to do with the Middle East. I got very lucky (or providence) when clicked on your channel! I don't think I have ever learned so much about the history of the Jewish and Palestinian people ever!...Great job and I can't wait to check out other videos and your recommendations of other researchers...
The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence[a] is a series of letters that were exchanged during World War I in which the Government of the United Kingdom agreed to recognize Arab independence in a large region after the war in exchange for the Sharif of Mecca launching the Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire.[2][3] The correspondence had a significant influence on Middle Eastern history during and after the war; a dispute over Palestine continued thereafter.[b]
That correspondence along with the secret (at the time) Sykes-Picot Agreement when revealed REALLY Soured relations even worse than already before between the Arabs with the British & the Jewish Zionists at the time.
@@jbx30001those letters were from a British government official who spoke on his behalf and therefore they were certainly wanted and ratified by the government, a fact which is also made explicit in some government documents available on the United Nations website.
It was neve "Ottoman-Palestine", the word Palestine wasn´t employed until the British Mandate was created after WWI, and it hadn´t been used since the Roman Empire when Hadrian renamed it Palestine purpousley to earase Israel and Judah from the map.
And who exactly inhabited the land before the Jews were commanded by their god to kill all the inhabitants. So it had a name before your loved Israel and Judea originally committed ethnic cleansing and genocide. So nothing is new today besides the Europeans making the Jews the Palestinian's problem.
hebret samuel (aka the bootlicker of the arab settlers) calling the Jews "colonists" is the most ironic thing I've ever seen, those arab "villages" are at most recent settlements formed by hejazi/nejdi/bosnian/ottoman/kurdish clans
That’s actually nonsense, a lot of academic and genetic research has proven that Palestinians share the same genetic descent of Jews, and are descendant of ancient Israel, and not of Arab settlers, this is could be inferred from genetic testing and historical evidence, in fact both the first president and prime minister of Israel believed this, obviously exceptions exist, but this applies both ways since there were Jewish converts not from ancient Israelite descent, and if we talk about the specific villages and towns not their populations, then that’s a ridiculous argument because people naturally build new towns and villages, but they don’t, if they are decent human beings, invade other people, steal their lands, and then build settlements upon them. Here are my sources: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/#:~:text=Archaeologic%20and%20genetic%20data%20support,but%20not%20in%20genetic%2C%20differences. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23052947/ blogs.timesofisrael.com/most-palestinians-are-descendants-of-jews/ There is a rich amount of evidence to prove this, but your dogma and racism is blinding you
If jews are native to Israel, then go there, claim it and fuck off Europe and stop sending mass migration and promoting mixing, lest you want us to start doing it back to you Maybe you guys need syrian refugees instead of Europe and the us, after all those Syrians and afghans and Africans are your neighbors, not ours, your duty to take them in
@@Goodguy507why can't Jews naturally build villages in their own land but Arab settlers and migrants can. Sounds like Arab Islamic apartheid exceptionalism to me.
@@ajvorob9117 i don’t know if you’re actually dumb or just pretending, I’ve already proven that Palestinians aren’t migrants or settlers, they are descended from the original inhabitants of the land, while the immigrant Jews came from Europe, Ethiopia, India, etc. and they are building settlements everywhere, while Palestinians can’t, why are you trying to make it sound like Arabs have political and military control over Palestine and not the Jews
I think I now better understand Golda Meir when she said, "We will only have peace with [the Arabs] when they love their children more than they hate us."
@@yhvvcbhjjggjk-id1reforgot that the European Jews only contribute to 40% of the Jewish population in Israel? The truth is Muslims hate Jews , Allah hates Jews , Muhammad hated Jews. It runs through their veins, if the immigrants we're from Algeria, Yemen , Oman, Saudi Arabia etc there'd be peace . It just depends who's the occupier
@@yhvvcbhjjggjk-id1re: Not all Jews are European. A significant portion of Israel's population is descended from those Jews who were expelled from Arab countries in the post-WW2 era. Where do you expect *them* to go back to?
@@danielbishop1863 this jews that were expelled from the arabs states were expelled after the jews expelled 700000 palistian arabs from their lands. The midle eastern jews would not have been expelled if the European jwes did not create their colonial state in 1948 .the majority of Israeli jews are with some amount of European decent. Also this middle eastern jews could move the west as well the way many marocan jews moved to France .Also the fast majority of jews in the world are with European decent
And every dimwit has gotta weigh in with their 2 cents even though they’ve never stepped into Israel. That goes for American Jews and American Muslims. Sick of tourists acting like they’re experts because they searched a few TH-cam videos.
@@sharkquisha3407LOL, absolute nonsense, I think you're mistaking Philistines for Palestine, Philistines were a Greek invader people from the island of Crete, with zero Semitic ties, the first mention of Palestine in it's modern form was Herodotus, which called it "district of Syria, called Palaistinê". Though the land was still referred to as JUDEA, Judea being the Greek & Roman adaptation of the name Judah, an Israelite tribe and later kingdom. Plus during the times of Herodotus, there was no Arab life in the land of Judea, Arabs spread through Islam which up to the 7th century AD was inhabited majorly by Jews
Wow! I have watched a great many videos on this topic, and your video is one of the few, if not the only video that presents the unvarnished historical facts. I am extremely familiar with the historical details of the conflict, yet I still learned some things. I especially appreciate your detailed presentation of Arab activities during this period, as well as your inclusion of relevant historical film reels from that time. Of course, the conflict is even more complex than what is revealed here, and much time is required to fully understand it; time that most people will not invest. Perhaps some of the people who have preconceived notions of the conflict will stumble upon this video and learn something.
It’s not complicated. People who think they are better than other people use any leverage they to do whatever they want, and take over other’s territory for themselves and other people who also think they’re better than other people - in todays context that means doing so but at a rate that isn’t conspicuously criminal. Israel interestingly is the only nation since its inception that was permanently at war. It probably always will be. And nobody will be able to do anything about it. Because Jews don’t have any other homeland, despite being unable to legitimately provide any evidence that it was an ancient homeland (I’m surprised they didn’t just make it up but it would probably be found out) Conversely Muslims probably cover more landmass than any other religion, and their religion is famous for taking over other territories in the most vicious and efficient manner, making them not the easiest to empathise with. Idk at the end of the story but it doesn’t look that complicated. Im not keen on nationalism of any kind (Israel “ironically” is the most nationalist ethnostate there is) but both Muslims and Jews are famous for messing around in countries affairs or full out take over, in the case of Muslims in history the attempted takeover of India and Spain, and successful takeover of, well everywhere in he Middle East outside of Mecca and large swathes of Southeast Asia in Indochina. As for the Jews they seem for some reason devoted to destroying Europe from the inside with immigration, something which is obvious to even the most vehement philosemite amongst other things which I won’t repeat to avoid the label ‘antisemite’.
@chaiam thanks for that load of unvarnished horseshit. I'm sure the video maker who shared a bunch of facts and documentation was looking for the opinion of nihilistic idiots. If not for you, he may well have been disappointed.
At 33:48 you stated "Jewish immigration into Palestine escalated in the early 1930's, with the Jewish population growing from about 17 percent in 1931 to about 30 percent in 1930". "growing from about 17 percent in 1931 to about 30 percent in 1930"? How is that even possible?
17:16 " while in purely Arab towns such as Nablus Hebron and Gaza" Nablus Hebron and Gaza became purely Arab towns when their old communities of Jews perished following 1929 riots (The 1929 massacre in Hebron is mentioned in the video.)
@@edgzta Yes, Ottoman census of the 16th century shows these communities. The title Mizrahi is a recent one encompassing all descendants of Jews that fled from Arab countries.
@@ajvorob9117what do u mean by “many Arabs” , there were too many Arabs who even got autonomy during the 1700’s , there was a significant Arab population in Palestine at that time , so stop sharing lies u typical zio***st
Brilliant!! Thank you for your unbiased honesty when covering this controversial and often skewed topic. It’s crazy that in a time where access to information is almost without limit, that the truth would be so hard to come by. That lies, misinformation and straight up antisemitism could still be so prevalent and widespread. That is the true cause for the entire Arab-Israeli conflict, for peace cannot be obtained without a strong foundation based on truth and reality. The ongoing conceded effort to distort the truth regarding this subject is without a shadow of a doubt, perpetuating a situation that could have been entirely avoided. I truly hope that more brave and honest people like you, coming out with the truth will lead to a longstanding reconciliation and peace in the region.
This account, while very informative is incredibly biased 😅. To claim that Palestinians retaliated against their colonizers because they were “jealous” is an oversimplification of the stories of the people that lived there. Arabs did not just live in clans. They lived in cities, they were intellectuals, poets, they had a rich culture. They had deep ties to the region. While the Zionists NEVER attempted to integrate. In Israel today Jewish Israelis have extremely limited knowledge of Arab culture (despite being surrounded by it) and don’t speak Arabic. From my perspective it is the Jews who have always lived in paranoia( understandable but projected in the wrong place) many of them considering themselves to be of a higher class than the Arabs.
This is not objective, it's Republican propaganda, literally. Like Trump's attempts at Middle Eastern place, doesn't even ask the Palestinians their opinion. If you think this is objective you should check out Palestinian perspective or even Israeli perspectives that do not agree with the government cuz you clearly are uninformed about those issues outside what one half of the conflict wants you to think
There were two British Mandates. One is the British Mandate For Mesopotamia (Iraq) which was to transfer control of the land to "native authorities and shall take account of the rights and interests and wishes of all the population in handing the mandated territory." and then there was a British Mandate For Palestine which was to transfer control to "the historical connection of the Jewish people...for reconstituting their national home." The British were trustees and the Arabs (in Iraq) and Jews worldwide the beneficiaries of the Mandates. The British mandate for Palestine included the Trans-Jordan (today's Jordan.) The Revisionists did not call for a Jewish state from the River of Egypt to the Euphrates but the original borders as established at the San Remo Conference.
Thank you for yet another excellent bit of educational history. I look forward to listening to part two soon. I hope the people of the region manage to find peace soon. God be with you out there, everybody. ✝️ :)
I never got the palistine tactics. Even if you grant them every position and moral ground. There leaders are still not adapting to the fact there lossing ground. Idk a lot, but this confusses me.
When you believe you are superior and dealing with Kafirs and Dhimmis, who Allah wants you to defeat and humiliate, you don't think you can lose, so you go for "all or nothing". So far, this tactic has landed them with nothing. Very doubtful they will ever change.
@@banto1i mean that rounds very fucking stong i would proably not put it like that. but it is rather well foolhardy to keep trying the same thing while losing ground. lets not discount that the palistinian are comming from the position there being colonised.
@@electricangel4488 Germans are not colonizing their own native homeland of Germany. The French are not colonizing their own native homeland of France. The Spanish are not colonizing their own native homeland of Spain. The Poles are not colonizing their own homeland of native Poland....and the Judeans (what you call Jews for short) are not colonizing their own native homeland of Judea!
@@electricangel4488 The video shows Palestinians are an integral part of the region's Arab Islamic majority (The process of appropriating the title Palestinians started in 1966). The region's Arab Islamic majority cannot accept the existence of an independent state of a minority, be it of Maronites, Assyrians, Druze or others especially of Jews. By Arab Islamic supremacy culture, if it is not dominated and controlled by an Arab Islamic regime then it is an occupation.
@@electricangel4488the Palestinians are the colonizers. The Jews have been on that land for thousands of years prior to any Arabs setting foot on it. They’re coming from a position of losing land that was stolen from the Jews and is being rightfully returned.
45:31 Of course, it should be president Hindenburg. Ludendorff, that archfiend of the 20th century, was Hindrmburg's brains in World War I, later Hitler's co-putschists but by 1933 had fallen out with him and found his own esoteric cult. He and Hitler publicly reconciled shortly before Ludendorf's death in 1935.
1. At the Paris Peace conference the Arabs argued they were a homogenous people deserving of a state. The Jews argued they also deserved a state based on their historical connection to the land and asked to reconstitute what they once had. 2. At San Remo the Arabs got what is today Syria and Iraq, the jews got what is today Israel and Jordan. The transfer of the lands' titles took place in the treaty of Sevres. There was a French Mandate of Syria, a British Mandate for Palestine (to transfer the control of the land to the Jews) and a British Mandate for Mesopotamia (Iraq.) The Arabs and Jews were respectively beneficiaries, the British and French trustees to transfer control to the Arabs and Jews respectively. Iraq became independent in 1932, Syria in 1946. In 1922 due to Arab violence the Arabs got 70% of the Jewish land in an illegal act by the British. Jordan became independent in 1946, and the Jewish state became independent in 1948 and renamed itself Israel. There is no Israeli Palestinian conflict. It is an Arab Israeli conflict. Or an Arab Jew conflict.
Why? Jews are from the land of Israel. That is the international law conventions (San Remo Conference, UN Charter article 22) recognized the Jews historic connection to the land of Israel and allowed the Jews to reconstitute their ancestral homeland (Jewish sate) in 1920 (independent in 1948.) Arabs are foreign to the land. @@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0
International law convention recognizes the Jews' historical connection to the land of Israel. "European" Jews are foreign to Europe. Its like claiming European Arabs have a right to a European Arab state of some kind. @@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0
@@Foreign0817 eum no you dint. Even if we take the old testament as a historical account it was writen when the The pentarchy of the fillistines was already a thing.
Pretty sure David slapped a stone in a philistines head bro. I mean the bible does pretty much say the jewish people took the land from the palestinians. Just a point
Roman History In the 2nd century CE, the Romans crushed the revolt of Shimon Bar Kokhba (132 CE), during which Jerusalem and Judea were regained and the area of Judea was renamed Palaestina in an attempt to minimize Jewish identification with the land of Israel. The Romans are also making a political point here that it [Judea] will never become a client kingdom again. It will continue under direct rule of Rome, the Romans changed the name of Judea to Palestine, (Syria-Palestina) The Romans destroyed the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem
It was the british mandate authorities in that land that dug up from hell the name palestine.Under the previous centuries of muslim occupation muslim rule they never referred to the land as palestine.The British also created out of most of that mandate land a seperate mandate called trans jordan,that later became Jordan.And that is already an arab racist anti jewish palestinian state.But they demand everywhere in that area,and that is the problem.
That’s not true, under the Islamic rule it was always called palestine, in fact , it was a province or a military district Called Filastin, it’s capital was Ramla … The name palestine never disappeared for 1300 years of Islamic rule, u should get educated
The conflict officially began in 1878 when Jewish immigrants from Central Europe set up the first "Settlement" on land they bought in Petah Tikva. If they had been Muslim immigrants there would have been no conflict. The conflict was and never will be about land. It was and always will be due to the need for Muslims to see Jews as an inferior race, to be subjugated to Muslim authority. If all the Jews in Israel (and the territories) would convert to Islam, the conflict would be over in less than a second.
Only because they wouldn't want to destroy Al-Aqsa Mosque or Dome of the Rock, as well as sharing the grand mosque in Hebron, and not making petitions to seize Jonah's mosque. But, there's still the issue of Palestinian refugees to be considered regardless.
Mandate Palestine is correct. It was never a place or a country before the Mandate not after it. Once the Mandate was lifted, it seized to exist, as it should.
That’s the very interesting thing about this video; the early history and manufactured ‘Palestine’ identity. I’m gonna have to rewatch it, and I hope I internalise it because the current ‘he said, she said’ is a very unstable foundation for knowledge.
Thank you so much for this wonderful, and very accurate account of this history. This video should be shared by everyone with everyone and even used to teach in schools. Seems like not much has changed with the false reports and fake news about Israel from then to today. Unfortunately, we now have the internet and mass media who make it so much worse.
The Lord Jesus Christ is the Messiah and King of the Jews. He shall soon return to save Israel and give them the Holy Land. "Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" (Matthew 3:2, KJV). Even so, come, Lord Jesus! Establish the Kingdom in Jerusalem and save the world from the tyranny of Democracy (Daniel 7:7, KJV)!
@bdawg-qj9bq oh no! My IQ is low because I don't support settler colonialism and ethnic cleansing. Those are BIG BRAIN things of course. So is the holocaust. Only BIG BRAIN aryans get it bro.
I am grateful for this objective recount of events which is nonetheless sympathetic to either side when deserved, and at the same time disquieted to see some adopt genocidal Nazism when it will serve their turn, an attitude they have not renounced.
Jews act like genocidal nazis to Palestinians, but then use Marxism in Europe to soft genocide the place by mutting it out via mass migration and mixing Notice, jews hold no real beliefs, they will switch to nazism, fascism, Marxism, and capitalism based on whatever benefits them best, and regardless of sect believes they all stand together actively against a world mostly indifferent of their existence (unnecessary hostile attitude jews hold)
This is an excellent article, I’ve read a great deal on the topic’s of the history of the region. I’m so glad you point out the violence and corruption within the Arab elite in the 20’s and 30’s. Much of the retelling of history in the region is this abominable Nabkha where the Arabs were thrown off their land and disenfranchised where the history is that Jews bought much of the land legally .
Besides the fact that it was Hindenburg who was president of the Weimar republic and died in 1934( Ludendorff was in self-imposed exile after the beer hall putsch of 1923 in the Nordic countries and died in 1937) this is a very good video
Herbert Samuel the first jew to hold a cabinet position in Britain ?! Not quite. Indeed it was Benjamin Disraeli,a discendant of sephardic jews,who in the 19th century even was Prime Minister.
@@alexk8993you're referring to the British mandate of Palestine which was tasked with the goal of establishing the JEWISH national home not ARAB. The only people eho referred to themselves as "Palestinians" before 1948 were Jews.
@@ajvorob9117 dude stfu the Arabs in Palestine already started to identify as Palestinians with a Palestinian nationalism since the very first day of the mandate, and even before, the Palestinians were the people of Palestine who are mainly Arabs , just like how there were Iraqi jews , Syrian jews , Moroccan jews , there were also Palestinian jews, but palestinians is a term to describe the inhabitants of Palestine who are mainly arabs. Even David Ben Gurioun called the Palestinians as Arab palestinians , u can find it in this video
@@alexk8993 There were Arabs who lived in the British Mandate of Palestine but no Arab Palestinian identity before 1948. Before 1948, the Jews were the Palestinians. Case in point is the former name of the Jerusalem Post, which was the Palestine Post. Or the British calling to split the mandate territory between one state for the Jews and another for the Arabs. No mention of a state for the Palestinians. The Palestinian identity only coalesced after the establishment of Israel to antagonize the Jews.
What’s crazy is before the 20th century us Muslims the Jews and Christian’s all lived among each other without major conflict I truly think the best solution is making Jerusalem the international capital and have un troops guard it and use international law now for the rest of the country split it up between Israel and Palestine
Might have been an option at one point, but that ship has sailed now. There is no way an Israeli prime minister will want the loss of the Jewish control of Jerusalem to be their legacy.
You forgot to mention that the new Jewish landowners, primarily the Jewish Agency, actively worked to evict tenant farmers from their newly-acquired lands, thereby pushing many peasants (“fellahin”) to support the 1936 revolt against the British and fuel anti-Jewish violence . So land acquisitions, even if they were done through the landowning class in the region, were not completely benign and helped to impoverish the Palestinian peasantry, who were the majority of the population. Also, you seem to insinuate that the majority of the Palestinian Arab press was just pure propaganda drivel. This is a very biased video.
Definitely today the Palestinian press if you can call it that is 100 percent pure propaganda. I don’t know about back then but logically it was probably still pretty biased
Actually the Zionists paid reparations to every tenant farmer affected by the land purchase. And eviction is 100% legal as they did not actually own the land. The absentee landlords could have found alternative land for the tenant farmers but they didn't. Instead all the responsibility fell on the Jewish buyers. Which they did.
If anything the Arabs became richer through Jewish land purchases and settlement. The tenant farmer no longer needed to be tied down to a land he had no heart or stomach to work for and could learn other trades. Not to mention they had to pay exorbitant rents to the absentee landlords. It was essentially a medieval feudal system which Zionism helped abolish. The poverty of the fellaheen was largely due to the collusion between the ottoman government, absentee landlords, and the Arab effendi class.
The Arab press constantly claimed that Jewish land purchases massively displaced the Arab tenant farmers. But in reality the amount of actual displacement was very low. During the British mandate Era, over 3000 claims of alleged displacement were filed and only 600 of them were considered valid. Of those valid claims, half accepted resettlement and the others refused. Read "The Claim of Disposession "
Not to mention that even after the tenant farmers received compensation and agreed to move elsewhere, they attacked the Jews when they started plowing land that they legally bought. That's like a man purchasing a farm from another farm owner and compensating the former workers at the farm. Then when the man tries to put his own workers on the farm, they're attacked by the former workers. How is that in any way fair? You accept financial compensation and still try to attack people who legally purchased the land? That's barbaric nonsense that no sane person can claim is justifiable. It's not a reason to murder. Legal eviction does not give you a right to kill. By that logic, people who are evicted from homes because they can't pay the mortgage have a right to murder people.
finally a fair video among all the anti Israeli garbage, massive kudos for mention the weissman-faisal agreement, a massively underdiscussed document, demonstrating that in some ways, the conflict was resolved before it began, since the British did not keep their agreement with Faisal it was moot, but the basic idea that this is not some insane unresolvable conflict is much more important
The Jewish people are *indigenous* to Judea - Land of Israel. 🕎🙌 After over 2 millennia of forced exile, persecution, and genocide, the *(re)establishment* of *Jewish sovereignty* in our *ancestral homeland* is a remarkable story of *national liberation.* Jewish claims to the land are far more than biblical accounts. Our *religion, language, culture, holidays, rituals, liturgy, history,* and even the words Jew and Jewish are all inseparable from *historical Judea* and our collective longing to *return to the Land of Israel.* The land of Israel is where Jews became *a people* and the *oldest monotheistic faith.* It is where Jews *achieved sovereignty* before losing it and regaining it several times until much of the *indigenous Jewish population* was either killed or forced into exile following the *Roman Empire’s* brutal suppression of the heroic *Jewish revolt* in the second century of the Common Era. Though the Romans subsequently *renamed the land* Syria Palaestina, the Jewish people *never left* our homeland physically or spiritually. *Archaeological evidence* of Jewish life can be found in more than *30,000 sites* in Israel with antiquities dating back centuries. Even when we were massacred and persecuted by Christian Crusaders, Arab and Ottoman *invaders,* the British-led Jordanian Arab Legion, or more recently Hamas suicide bombers and rockets, our attachment *never* wavered. It is in this same land where Jews miraculously *revitalized* the Hebrew language, *rebuilt* the institutions necessary for independence, *re-engaged* in rituals that are uniquely observed in the land of Israel, *redeveloped* the land and the economy so that by several magnitudes the Jewish and non-Jewish populations grew, and offered refuge not just to the remnant which survived the Holocaust, but also millions of Jews fleeing persecution from the Muslim Middle East, Ethiopia, and the former Soviet Union. Today, Israel is a *rich tapestry of diverse citizens,* including over half of Jewish Israelis who identify as Jews of color and 20% of whom are Arab citizens. *Peace Not Hate!* 🇮🇱💙
@@monsieurcharcutier4490I feel like a lot of the side of the Palestinians downplay and ignore the fact the Arabs wanted the jews wiped off the map, instead of trying to live peacefully and work out a plan to live together. Which is an important point that changes the framework of the conflict completely
regardless of one's heritage, honesty is one, truth is one, there are no two different truths or honesty... just as a truly honest parent brings to justice his/her own offspring if it commits a crime. Facts are facts: Jews AND Arabs both lived in the land called Palestine. Both have the right to exist as a State. A few borders between the two States have been proposed, all accepted by the Jews, and all repudiated by the Arabs, who could have had a much bigger territory that what is now the Gaza and the West Bank territories... They refused because they want to exterminate the Jews... at this point, who can honestly blame the Jews from responding in tune?
Jew hatred is enshrined in the vile ideology of islam. islam is the reason there is no peace in the Middle East ...... PERIOD ..... and no, I am not Jewish but I do stand firmly in their support.
@@claudiotaginifacts: before the British mandate only 7% of the Palestinian population was Jewish, so they certainly had the right to live in those lands, but not the immigrant Jews. Any state would have refused to divide its territory with foreign immigrants, especially since the final proposal envisaged 56% of Palestine to a minority of 33% of the population who bought only 7% of the land. If the Arabs would have wanted to exterminate the Jews they would have done so when they were still a small minority, so if they opposed Israel it was not out of hatred towards the Jews, but hatred towards the invaders, a hatred that any people in the same situation would have had.
The fear the Arabs stated of a few becoming too many, very too quickly then ending in bloodshed is in religious text. If remembered from my classes. Leaving from the starving peninsula, to the Moorish Battles, the Eygptian exodus, and all the inbetweens. The stuff that did not cast a bright light or long enough shadow.
Hey @casualhostorian, is there any way you'd be willing to do a video analyzing Norman Finkelstein's perspective/claims, and whether his scholarly work should be taken seriously or whether he's a propagandist?
You shouldn't be using the modern Palestinian flag to represent the Arabs in the pre-state years. It was created in 1964, and the Arabs didn't have a flag before then.
Nationalism of arabic "race", as it was created by usa, Britain and France (basically nato of the end of ww1), is just the byproduct of said divisions caused by the western fascist colonizers. We will use the palestinian flag because it represents what palestinians have in their culture thag unites them, which is surviving the nakba. So, that's why we pro palestinians love this flag and will wear them till palestinians are equal to jews.
As a descendant of persecuted jews and a kz-lager survivor... While this video might be factually accurate, it is still extremely biased against Arabs. Where is the mentioning of the goals of some of the settlers to establish a state that explicitly excluded the local population?
oh shut up, lol I love that you acknowledge its factual tho, yes its biased because the facts are in fact biased. the arabs dislike the facts because of that. so just stay quiet.
Probably because Arab propaganda is based on myths and falsehoods. Hence why actual facts is damaging to their delusional fantasies. You're almost there.
And the zionists certainly wanted Arabs to stay put. Their reasoning was that the cultivation and rejuvenation of the land will benefit them economically . Which it did.
Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer. If you decide to continue your subscription, you’ll get a 50% discount bit.ly/CasualHistorian_mh
Why not change the title to "Arabs and Jews"? and if you insist on Zionists, then place it to 'Arabs nationalists' or 'pan Arabs'.
Sorry for leaving a comment here, but I wanted to get your attention.
So get this - my great grandpa, a Sephardic Jew from Jerusalem, was actually a childhood friend of Husseini’s.
As far as I know, the last contact the two had was sometime after 1935. Due to Ottoman restrictions, one’s neighbour’s consent was required to sell property. Husseini, not wanting to be seeing allowed to sell land to Jews, Vetoed a sell of land next to the Damascus gate.
My great grandpa walked up to him, remined him who he was, and suggested a way in which it would appear as though the sell would be done to Christian hands, as opposed to Jewish.
Husseini agreed.
If you are interested and able to contact me, I have a few more tales of Jerusalem and Mandatory Palestine during that time.
One question - why haven’t you mentioned the massive influx of Arab immigrants to the land during British and late Turkish rule?
@Casualhistorian if you are reading this, do research about the biafara kingdom in west Africa, long time before the colonization era and long before 11th centuries.. The modern time of biafra is coming. And who are the biafrans ?!
😮😮😮
When you call yourself casual historian I expected someone who does more that get info from prepared documentaries and actually was a historian.
The guy playing Jabotinsky sure sounds handsome. I wonder if I can get him to play the role in _my_ next video...
I liked the accent
Also was that same man doing the voice for Winston Churchill?
Pretty sure Jabotinsky had a Russian or Polish accent - not German.
Shut up Sam 😂
@@banto1His native language was Yiddish. So the accent is closer to German than to Russian
The president that died prior to Hitler declaring himself Führer, was Hindenburg, not Lüdendorf.
"OH! The HUMANITY !!!
"Oh! The humanity!"
The comments here are going to be pleasant. I'm sure we will see even handed cordial debate
So far so good. We all have options, this information was just fact without hyperbole.
Excellent video, but there is a small error at 45:30, when you speak about the situation in Europe, and that Hitler gained absolut power after the death of the German President Erich Ludendorf. Which is of course wrong, the last president of the Weimar era was the former General Paul von Hindenburg. Who during WWI, together with Ludendorf, had defeated the Russians at the Battle of Tannenberg, and during the latter part of the war had been the de facto rulers of Germany.
After the war they parted ways. Living for a short stint in Sweden, Ludendorf returned to Germany and got embroiled in various right wing groups, and gravitated towards NSDAP. After taking part in Hitler's failed Beerhall Putsch in 1923, he would later brake with Hitler and the NSDAP. Forming his own party and - together with his wife - delve deep into Germanic mysticism and esoterism, and at the early part of the 1930, he managed to revive his relation with Hindenburg.
There’s not a lot of good videos on 1920-1947 Arab-Jewish relations in Mandatory Palestine. Thanks for your important work
There is no such place as "Palestine." The land belongs to the Jews. "Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?" (Psalm 2:1, KJV). Even so, come, Lord Jesus! Establish the Kingdom in Jerusalem and save the world from the tyranny of Democracy (Daniel 7:7, KJV)!
@@davidlafleche1142 not so convincing
@@nkristianschmidt right? The only nation on earth that has been able to and even assisted by world governments in replacing an entire land belonging to others because of fairy tales.
Edit, no I don’t take sides, both Jews and Muslims cause more problems than any other groups in the world because of their attachments to fairy tales.
Those who are secular, i.e. don’t believe in fantasies or think they or others like them are better because of their beliefs in fairy tales or being born from special wombs, contribute immensely to society.
Christians are tolerable because they massively reformed through Protestantism. Catholicism is more cancerous.
Sincerely the world would be better if they all got their own planet to fight it out and let the rest of us get in with it. We’d still have problems but they wouldn’t be so predictably insidious and depend on other people being attached to fantasies.
@@chaiam Historical details are important to study and research for each judgement call we ask our selves to make. Very much the same as when a verdict is made in a court case.
@@nkristianschmidtYou can find REAL historical details on Wikipedia with references cited. It was Jewish land before and for much longer than it was Muslim. Arabs didn’t even enter the land until the Romans let them after they kicked out the Jews for too many uprisings. Quit being lazy and research it for yourself. It takes five minutes and you won’t look like an idiot next to you write a comment like that.
babe wake up new casual historian video and its almost an hour
There’s absolutely no way anyone could have any disagreement on this topic. This is the one topic that everyone agrees on. No differing opinions on Israeli history
Wdym?
No one's falling for your bait, dude lmao
The only thing people can agree on is that this topic is the BEST way to drive up views and comments.
Like, the land belongs to the Jews. What else is there?
Oi vie the gohem are on to us
Bro its sad that the Internet is such a cesspool now
that's what happens when global literacy rates go up, but 50% of humans on the planet still have an IQ of less than 100.
When has it not been?
The video was amazingly informative and objective. Really hope you make many more video like this covering all the early/middle history of Israel, since you're one of the very rare channels making trustworthy content about the topic
Informative, but it reads too apologist.
Amazingly objective? Everything he quotes from the Jewish perspective was patient and understanding and about how they didn’t want to take Arab lands. Yet every single Arab quote, document, and perspective is also about wiping out the Jews or killing them or negative. That doesn’t seem so objective to me. It seems pretty biased. Where’s the information and ramle and lydda? Where is the details about jaffa and deir Yassin?
This was hardly objective
@@ScottBub this video ended way before the 1948 war arabs declared. Deir yassin happened in that war. It would be very wierd to bring that up in this video then.
Finally! Thank you for a thorough, factual account of this history. Very rare to find unbiased truth on this topic. Well done.
8:28 Well done man! Just for the record because I know you’re a perfectionist, his name is pronounced Ze’ev Jabotinsky, not Zeev.
Or just Zev
Or Vladimir.
I asked my grandfather “Wasn’t it a good thing J€w$ & Israel gained their independence so their people can finally have a place to go in peace!”
He just got mad and start cursing me out!! What was that all about?? Now he won’t even talk to me….
What was that about? Um, your grandfather's an antisemite?
Excellent job, really good work. Looking forward to seeing your future videos.
25:45 is such an interesting point. I've long wondered why the Palestinian issue is so deeply important to Muslims around the world, and I knew the religious significance of Jerusalem was one aspect, but its weird I've never realized how odd the fixation on Jerusalem is when the city hasn't been all thay important in the Grand Arc of Islamic history.
Practically speaking, and not trying to offend anyone, but it seems like the role of Jerusalem in Islam is mostly to tie it to Christianity and Judaism as an Abrahamic religion than anything else.
As a Muslim I think that the presenter here is relying on not so accurate sources in this regard which is understandable for me. There's a lot of confusion and misunderstanding when talking about Islam, and when it's about islam and the Palestinian question, oh boy! What is really important for me is to make clear that the presenter is underestimating how important Jerusalem is for the Muslims. It's importance is in Quran and in Sunnah, which is the preaching of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. The only city Caliph Omar visited upon controlling it by Muslim armies is Jerusalm. During Omars Caliph Muslim armies opened Persia, egypt and the levant but only Jerusalem was paid a visit by the caliph, this is to show how categorically wrong to play down the importance of Jerusalem and Palestine to the muslims and also to show that its importance is not stimming from AlHusaini's propaganda.
Every Muslim man, woman and child in the Islamic world is our family member and if one dies on our notice, we will yell for the world to notice our brothers and sisters' lives taken unjustly.
@@snifey7694 What of the Muslim Uyghur people in China?
Can Jews have equal right to pray in the Temple Mount? Or does right to life only apply to Muslims?
@@uchannelu5948 That's it? This doesn't sound like much.
So every immigrant and refugee is a ""settler""?
Abraham/Ibrahim was the original Jewish immigrant/invader/settler...
@@banto1
Yeah... that's a complete myth. The Israelites were Canaanite tribes whom, with the time, developed a separate identity and culture.
@@מ.מ-ה9ד we'll, that's one theory among many - not a proven fact. Fact remains that these ancient Hebrews were known as "ivrim", meaning they "crossed over" from somewhere. Bible says it was from Ur, and they probably crossed over the Jordan river. Only thing left of the Canaanite's today is a pretty ugly dog.
@@banto1
It does not mean "crossed over", it means "located over".
I digress. That's an amazing dog, and every Jew has at least some direct Cannanite genetics and traditions.
@@מ.מ-ה9ד Well, the family did come to settle in Canaan and they weren't going to go full redneck and marry their sisters were they? So, yah, there is a Canaanite DNA in the mix for sure, as well as lots of other stuff from local tribes (midianite, edomite, amorite, etc...) as mentioned in the good book. (and that dog is still ugly by current dog standards).
At 77, a lifetime of hearing of the oppression and repression of the Arabs by the Jews in the Levant and knowing the truth, this production is a valuable addition to my library. Thank you for your time and effort.
The Palestinians didn't just hate the Jews they even hated their own kind. That's why the Druze who lived there sided with the Israelis, they were tired of being treated like shit by the Muslims. Even today Israel is by far the best country for Druze to live in because it's the only country in that region that allows them to practice their religion in peace
A small mistake... in 40:32 you say: "...after the death of President Ludendorff." Should be "President Hindenburg". Anyway, a great video!!!
Excellent video, the history of israel and palestine is very difficult to study, especially considering its history is constantly being rewritten to suit a sides particular narrative. Most people think the history starts in 1948 when in reality the conflict spans back into the early 1900s. Even back in the 1800s the population of palestine was only a quarter of a million, most of the arabs not unlike the jews were refugees, from all over the middle east.
The conflict began with the failed attempts of Mohamad to be accepted by Jews as a prophet.
@@ef2718 Well prior to that the Jews were conquered and subjected by both the Babylonians and the Roman Empire.
No the palestinian are mostly, like all levantine people, descendant of semitic people who descend from ancient canaan like the jews. Their history can be like this, they were jews and samaritains convert to Christianity and who spoke greek and amaraic at the Time of the roman empire. Jews always lived there and had a remaining presence till the genocidal first crusade. When the arabs conquered the levant, they were a minority in those conquered land and they didnt replace the population, but they ruled them. The population became majority muslim and arabic in a assimilation process that lasted centuries. So yeah Palestinians have a pretty good claim to the land like the jews. Its also a more effective one in my view since they pretty much always lived there. Of course through 2000 years the Palestine was a land of immigration and emmigration, pretty much like all country and nation in the mediteranean. They were always there.
Dude , the Palestinians being refuges claim was already debunked, Palestinians are native to Palestine and the Levant , they have been living in Palestine for centuries,
The land wasn’t poorly populated, but that’s how the whole Arab world was, the whole greater syria had 3,000,000 , and Palestinian with nearly 700,000 in 1900 was one of the most populous.
@sirialexa9001
U can keep telling yourself more lies, that won’t change the fact that there are Palestinian people and they are recognized by the international law, they have a flag,an anthem,a recognized territory, a government and everything else needed for a group of people to be a nation.
Happy your channel was suggested to me...YT is currently flooded with anything to do with the Middle East. I got very lucky (or providence) when clicked on your channel! I don't think I have ever learned so much about the history of the Jewish and Palestinian people ever!...Great job and I can't wait to check out other videos and your recommendations of other researchers...
The channel "Shaun" made a good video about the subject called "Palestine".
They initially considered making it optional Palestine, but eventually stopped giving people a choice.
Lol
The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence[a] is a series of letters that were exchanged during World War I in which the Government of the United Kingdom agreed to recognize Arab independence in a large region after the war in exchange for the Sharif of Mecca launching the Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire.[2][3] The correspondence had a significant influence on Middle Eastern history during and after the war; a dispute over Palestine continued thereafter.[b]
So no formal agreements ratified by governments, just an exchange of letters by gov. officials.
That correspondence along with the secret (at the time) Sykes-Picot Agreement when revealed REALLY Soured relations even worse than already before between the Arabs with the British & the Jewish Zionists at the time.
@@jbx30001those letters were from a British government official who spoke on his behalf and therefore they were certainly wanted and ratified by the government, a fact which is also made explicit in some government documents available on the United Nations website.
The media should follow every new "war story" this week with a link to this article. Very relevant.
This was very thorough and well made. Needs more views!
Oh boy, I can imagine this will be a friendly and non controversial comment section relating to the State of Israel.
illegitimate state
Palestine doesn't exist
It was neve "Ottoman-Palestine", the word Palestine wasn´t employed until the British Mandate was created after WWI, and it hadn´t been used since the Roman Empire when Hadrian renamed it Palestine purpousley to earase Israel and Judah from the map.
It was literally called ottoman palestine , go and search “ the Timeline of the name palestine” , get your facts straight and stop talking nonsense
@@alexk8993wrong
And who exactly inhabited the land before the Jews were commanded by their god to kill all the inhabitants. So it had a name before your loved Israel and Judea originally committed ethnic cleansing and genocide. So nothing is new today besides the Europeans making the Jews the Palestinian's problem.
@@alexk8993there was no ottoman district or governate called “palestine “
More like the 4th century BCE but pop off dude.
Thank you for your presentation.
hebret samuel (aka the bootlicker of the arab settlers) calling the Jews "colonists" is the most ironic thing I've ever seen, those arab "villages" are at most recent settlements formed by hejazi/nejdi/bosnian/ottoman/kurdish clans
That’s actually nonsense, a lot of academic and genetic research has proven that Palestinians share the same genetic descent of Jews, and are descendant of ancient Israel, and not of Arab settlers, this is could be inferred from genetic testing and historical evidence, in fact both the first president and prime minister of Israel believed this, obviously exceptions exist, but this applies both ways since there were Jewish converts not from ancient Israelite descent, and if we talk about the specific villages and towns not their populations, then that’s a ridiculous argument because people naturally build new towns and villages, but they don’t, if they are decent human beings, invade other people, steal their lands, and then build settlements upon them.
Here are my sources:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/#:~:text=Archaeologic%20and%20genetic%20data%20support,but%20not%20in%20genetic%2C%20differences.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23052947/
blogs.timesofisrael.com/most-palestinians-are-descendants-of-jews/
There is a rich amount of evidence to prove this, but your dogma and racism is blinding you
If jews are native to Israel, then go there, claim it and fuck off Europe and stop sending mass migration and promoting mixing, lest you want us to start doing it back to you
Maybe you guys need syrian refugees instead of Europe and the us, after all those Syrians and afghans and Africans are your neighbors, not ours, your duty to take them in
U are correct
@@Goodguy507why can't Jews naturally build villages in their own land but Arab settlers and migrants can. Sounds like Arab Islamic apartheid exceptionalism to me.
@@ajvorob9117 i don’t know if you’re actually dumb or just pretending, I’ve already proven that Palestinians aren’t migrants or settlers, they are descended from the original inhabitants of the land, while the immigrant Jews came from Europe, Ethiopia, India, etc. and they are building settlements everywhere, while Palestinians can’t, why are you trying to make it sound like Arabs have political and military control over Palestine and not the Jews
Idk why so many videos are criminally underrated
And this is one of those
I think I now better understand Golda Meir when she said, "We will only have peace with [the Arabs] when they love their children more than they hate us."
You would have peace if you did not decide to leave Europe and make a country in a arab land
@@yhvvcbhjjggjk-id1reafter WW2 all land been colonized they returned it and have their on state.
@@yhvvcbhjjggjk-id1reforgot that the European Jews only contribute to 40% of the Jewish population in Israel? The truth is Muslims hate Jews , Allah hates Jews , Muhammad hated Jews. It runs through their veins, if the immigrants we're from Algeria, Yemen , Oman, Saudi Arabia etc there'd be peace . It just depends who's the occupier
@@yhvvcbhjjggjk-id1re: Not all Jews are European. A significant portion of Israel's population is descended from those Jews who were expelled from Arab countries in the post-WW2 era. Where do you expect *them* to go back to?
@@danielbishop1863 this jews that were expelled from the arabs states were expelled after the jews expelled 700000 palistian arabs from their lands. The midle eastern jews would not have been expelled if the European jwes did not create their colonial state in 1948 .the majority of Israeli jews are with some amount of European decent. Also this middle eastern jews could move the west as well the way many marocan jews moved to France .Also the fast majority of jews in the world are with European decent
The israeli-palestine situation is just ultra messy to say the least
And every dimwit has gotta weigh in with their 2 cents even though they’ve never stepped into Israel. That goes for American Jews and American Muslims. Sick of tourists acting like they’re experts because they searched a few TH-cam videos.
one side: quotes the fucking _protocols of elders of zion_
the other side: *wants to exist*
the world: "this seems like a complicated issue"
Exist by creating an ethnostate on an already existing country. Yeah just existing.
@@sharkquisha3407 and that country being Jordan?
@@sharkquisha3407An already existing country? What country was that? When did it exist? What was it's boundaries? It's currency, it's leader?
@@TrueBlue_01 since the bronze age and its borders were what you consider Israel.
@@sharkquisha3407LOL, absolute nonsense, I think you're mistaking Philistines for Palestine, Philistines were a Greek invader people from the island of Crete, with zero Semitic ties, the first mention of Palestine in it's modern form was Herodotus, which called it "district of Syria, called Palaistinê". Though the land was still referred to as JUDEA, Judea being the Greek & Roman adaptation of the name Judah, an Israelite tribe and later kingdom.
Plus during the times of Herodotus, there was no Arab life in the land of Judea, Arabs spread through Islam which up to the 7th century AD was inhabited majorly by Jews
Wow! I have watched a great many videos on this topic, and your video is one of the few, if not the only video that presents the unvarnished historical facts.
I am extremely familiar with the historical details of the conflict, yet I still learned some things.
I especially appreciate your detailed presentation of Arab activities during this period, as well as your inclusion of relevant historical film reels from that time.
Of course, the conflict is even more complex than what is revealed here, and much time is required to fully understand it; time that most people will not invest. Perhaps some of the people who have preconceived notions of the conflict will stumble upon this video and learn something.
I must agree with you. It is spot on.
It’s not complicated. People who think they are better than other people use any leverage they to do whatever they want, and take over other’s territory for themselves and other people who also think they’re better than other people - in todays context that means doing so but at a rate that isn’t conspicuously criminal.
Israel interestingly is the only nation since its inception that was permanently at war. It probably always will be. And nobody will be able to do anything about it. Because Jews don’t have any other homeland, despite being unable to legitimately provide any evidence that it was an ancient homeland (I’m surprised they didn’t just make it up but it would probably be found out)
Conversely Muslims probably cover more landmass than any other religion, and their religion is famous for taking over other territories in the most vicious and efficient manner, making them not the easiest to empathise with.
Idk at the end of the story but it doesn’t look that complicated.
Im not keen on nationalism of any kind (Israel “ironically” is the most nationalist ethnostate there is) but both Muslims and Jews are famous for messing around in countries affairs or full out take over, in the case of Muslims in history the attempted takeover of India and Spain, and successful takeover of, well everywhere in he Middle East outside of Mecca and large swathes of Southeast Asia in Indochina.
As for the Jews they seem for some reason devoted to destroying Europe from the inside with immigration, something which is obvious to even the most vehement philosemite amongst other things which I won’t repeat to avoid the label ‘antisemite’.
@chaiam thanks for that load of unvarnished horseshit. I'm sure the video maker who shared a bunch of facts and documentation was looking for the opinion of nihilistic idiots. If not for you, he may well have been disappointed.
At 33:48 you stated "Jewish immigration into Palestine escalated in the early 1930's, with the Jewish population growing from about 17 percent in 1931 to about 30 percent in 1930".
"growing from about 17 percent in 1931 to about 30 percent in 1930"?
How is that even possible?
17:16 " while in purely Arab towns such as Nablus Hebron and Gaza"
Nablus Hebron and Gaza became purely Arab towns when their old communities of Jews perished following 1929 riots (The 1929 massacre in Hebron is mentioned in the video.)
I believed these were Mizrahi Jews who had lived in those towns for hundreds of years if not longer.
@@edgzta Yes, Ottoman census of the 16th century shows these communities.
The title Mizrahi is a recent one encompassing all descendants of Jews that fled from Arab countries.
Yeah there were a minority of jewish arab community in Palestine, just like in Iraq or any other arab state.. but it was indeed purely Arab.
@@alexk8993lol prior yo the 1830 Egyptian migration/colonization by ibrahim pasha there weren't many Arabs living there
@@ajvorob9117what do u mean by “many Arabs” , there were too many Arabs who even got autonomy during the 1700’s , there was a significant Arab population in Palestine at that time , so stop sharing lies u typical zio***st
A well narrated and interesting video!
Thank you for your work
What happened to Jews and Europe when Hitler was appeased?
Another great video!
Brilliant!! Thank you for your unbiased honesty when covering this controversial and often skewed topic.
It’s crazy that in a time where access to information is almost without limit, that the truth would be so hard to come by. That lies, misinformation and straight up antisemitism could still be so prevalent and widespread.
That is the true cause for the entire Arab-Israeli conflict, for peace cannot be obtained without a strong foundation based on truth and reality.
The ongoing conceded effort to distort the truth regarding this subject is without a shadow of a doubt, perpetuating a situation that could have been entirely avoided. I truly hope that more brave and honest people like you, coming out with the truth will lead to a longstanding reconciliation and peace in the region.
Unbiased ?😀
This account, while very informative is incredibly biased 😅. To claim that Palestinians retaliated against their colonizers because they were “jealous” is an oversimplification of the stories of the people that lived there. Arabs did not just live in clans. They lived in cities, they were intellectuals, poets, they had a rich culture. They had deep ties to the region. While the Zionists NEVER attempted to integrate. In Israel today Jewish Israelis have extremely limited knowledge of Arab culture (despite being surrounded by it) and don’t speak Arabic. From my perspective it is the Jews who have always lived in paranoia( understandable but projected in the wrong place) many of them considering themselves to be of a higher class than the Arabs.
This is definitely not unbiased
The most objective overview of this conflict I have ever seen. Well done!
This is not objective, it's Republican propaganda, literally.
Like Trump's attempts at Middle Eastern place, doesn't even ask the Palestinians their opinion.
If you think this is objective you should check out Palestinian perspective or even Israeli perspectives that do not agree with the government cuz you clearly are uninformed about those issues outside what one half of the conflict wants you to think
There were two British Mandates. One is the British Mandate For Mesopotamia (Iraq) which was to transfer control of the land to "native authorities and shall take account of the rights and interests and wishes of all the population in handing the mandated territory." and then there was a British Mandate For Palestine which was to transfer control to "the historical connection of the Jewish people...for reconstituting their national home." The British were trustees and the Arabs (in Iraq) and Jews worldwide the beneficiaries of the Mandates. The British mandate for Palestine included the Trans-Jordan (today's Jordan.) The Revisionists did not call for a Jewish state from the River of Egypt to the Euphrates but the original borders as established at the San Remo Conference.
Amazing piece of work
Thank you for yet another excellent bit of educational history. I look forward to listening to part two soon. I hope the people of the region manage to find peace soon.
God be with you out there, everybody. ✝️ :)
I never got the palistine tactics. Even if you grant them every position and moral ground. There leaders are still not adapting to the fact there lossing ground. Idk a lot, but this confusses me.
When you believe you are superior and dealing with Kafirs and Dhimmis, who Allah wants you to defeat and humiliate, you don't think you can lose, so you go for "all or nothing". So far, this tactic has landed them with nothing. Very doubtful they will ever change.
@@banto1i mean that rounds very fucking stong i would proably not put it like that. but it is rather well foolhardy to keep trying the same thing while losing ground.
lets not discount that the palistinian are comming from the position there being colonised.
@@electricangel4488 Germans are not colonizing their own native homeland of Germany. The French are not colonizing their own native homeland of France. The Spanish are not colonizing their own native homeland of Spain. The Poles are not colonizing their own homeland of native Poland....and the Judeans (what you call Jews for short) are not colonizing their own native homeland of Judea!
@@electricangel4488
The video shows Palestinians are an integral part of the region's Arab Islamic majority (The process of appropriating the title Palestinians started in 1966). The region's Arab Islamic majority cannot accept the existence of an independent state of a minority, be it of Maronites, Assyrians, Druze or others especially of Jews. By Arab Islamic supremacy culture, if it is not dominated and controlled by an Arab Islamic regime then it is an occupation.
@@electricangel4488the Palestinians are the colonizers. The Jews have been on that land for thousands of years prior to any Arabs setting foot on it. They’re coming from a position of losing land that was stolen from the Jews and is being rightfully returned.
45:31 Of course, it should be president Hindenburg. Ludendorff, that archfiend of the 20th century, was Hindrmburg's brains in World War I, later Hitler's co-putschists but by 1933 had fallen out with him and found his own esoteric cult. He and Hitler publicly reconciled shortly before Ludendorf's death in 1935.
1. At the Paris Peace conference the Arabs argued they were a homogenous people deserving of a state. The Jews argued they also deserved a state based on their historical connection to the land and asked to reconstitute what they once had. 2. At San Remo the Arabs got what is today Syria and Iraq, the jews got what is today Israel and Jordan. The transfer of the lands' titles took place in the treaty of Sevres. There was a French Mandate of Syria, a British Mandate for Palestine (to transfer the control of the land to the Jews) and a British Mandate for Mesopotamia (Iraq.) The Arabs and Jews were respectively beneficiaries, the British and French trustees to transfer control to the Arabs and Jews respectively. Iraq became independent in 1932, Syria in 1946. In 1922 due to Arab violence the Arabs got 70% of the Jewish land in an illegal act by the British. Jordan became independent in 1946, and the Jewish state became independent in 1948 and renamed itself Israel. There is no Israeli Palestinian conflict. It is an Arab Israeli conflict. Or an Arab Jew conflict.
European jews asking for non european land is ridiculous.
Why? Jews are from the land of Israel. That is the international law conventions (San Remo Conference, UN Charter article 22) recognized the Jews historic connection to the land of Israel and allowed the Jews to reconstitute their ancestral homeland (Jewish sate) in 1920 (independent in 1948.) Arabs are foreign to the land. @@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0
International law convention recognizes the Jews' historical connection to the land of Israel. "European" Jews are foreign to Europe. Its like claiming European Arabs have a right to a European Arab state of some kind. @@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0
Thank you for this video , very informative and with good sources
Superb, Superb because you spoke the truth.
You don't find Palestine in the Bible.
**closes eyes and embraces the hellstorm.*
Oke so...
Palistine is a name given by by the roman emperor based on the fillistines.
So why does thr bible matter
@@electricangel4488 People keep bringing up the "which came first argument." They asked for it, I answered.
@@electricangel4488he did it to insult the jews and erase their national rights and history in Judea
@@Foreign0817 eum no you dint. Even if we take the old testament as a historical account it was writen when the The pentarchy of the fillistines was already a thing.
Pretty sure David slapped a stone in a philistines head bro. I mean the bible does pretty much say the jewish people took the land from the palestinians. Just a point
When you said President Lundendorff did you mean President Paul Von Hidenburg?
Roman History
In the 2nd century CE, the Romans crushed the revolt of Shimon Bar Kokhba (132 CE), during which Jerusalem and Judea were regained and the area of Judea was renamed Palaestina in an attempt to minimize Jewish identification with the land of Israel.
The Romans are also making a political point here that it [Judea] will never become a client kingdom again. It will continue under direct rule of Rome, the Romans changed the name of Judea to Palestine, (Syria-Palestina)
The Romans destroyed the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem
Excellent video! Just found your channel 👍
More people need to see this. There's so much detail that the usual propagandists conveniently leave out.
This is literal propaganda 😂
It was the british mandate authorities in that land that dug up from hell the name palestine.Under the previous centuries of muslim occupation muslim rule they never referred to the land as palestine.The British also created out of most of that mandate land a seperate mandate called trans jordan,that later became Jordan.And that is already an arab racist anti jewish palestinian state.But they demand everywhere in that area,and that is the problem.
That’s not true, under the Islamic rule it was always called palestine, in fact , it was a province or a military district Called Filastin, it’s capital was Ramla …
The name palestine never disappeared for 1300 years of Islamic rule, u should get educated
@@alexk8993no it wasn't you liar
@@ajvorob9117this is basic history, read and educate yourself
@@alexk8993nope
The conflict officially began in 1878 when Jewish immigrants from Central Europe set up the first "Settlement" on land they bought in Petah Tikva. If they had been Muslim immigrants there would have been no conflict. The conflict was and never will be about land. It was and always will be due to the need for Muslims to see Jews as an inferior race, to be subjugated to Muslim authority. If all the Jews in Israel (and the territories) would convert to Islam, the conflict would be over in less than a second.
The problem is Islam not arabs
The conflict began when Mohamad failed to convince Jews to accept him as a leader, ~1400 years ago.
@@ef2718 tru dat !
🤣 or all the muslims could convert to the jewish religion
Only because they wouldn't want to destroy Al-Aqsa Mosque or Dome of the Rock, as well as sharing the grand mosque in Hebron, and not making petitions to seize Jonah's mosque. But, there's still the issue of Palestinian refugees to be considered regardless.
Outstanding!👍 Tank you!
45:30 president Ludendorff? 😂
Whoops. That's an embarrassing mistake I missed during editing.
I love how for the quotations, we see middle eastern names w/ American accents, but for Churchill's quote, you hired an actor that can do British. 😅
Pro-Palestinian woke college students need to watch this
Just a recommendation can you make bars for sources to know which sources you are using for the exact moment.
Mandate Palestine is correct. It was never a place or a country before the Mandate not after it. Once the Mandate was lifted, it seized to exist, as it should.
ceased*
That’s the very interesting thing about this video; the early history and manufactured ‘Palestine’ identity.
I’m gonna have to rewatch it, and I hope I internalise it because the current ‘he said, she said’ is a very unstable foundation for knowledge.
@@mainstreet3023 ngram viewer shows the process of appropriating the title Palestinians by Arabs started in 1966.
@@ef2718 whenever it started, they have convinced a lot of people whose loose scrutiny of history is supported by the prejudice they deny.
@@mainstreet3023 indeed.
Try the viewer, it displays an unequivocal crystal clear graphic plot. Run [ Arabs, Jews, Palestinians].
Thank you so much for this wonderful, and very accurate account of this history. This video should be shared by everyone with everyone and even used to teach in schools.
Seems like not much has changed with the false reports and fake news about Israel from then to today. Unfortunately, we now have the internet and mass media who make it so much worse.
The Lord Jesus Christ is the Messiah and King of the Jews. He shall soon return to save Israel and give them the Holy Land. "Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" (Matthew 3:2, KJV). Even so, come, Lord Jesus! Establish the Kingdom in Jerusalem and save the world from the tyranny of Democracy (Daniel 7:7, KJV)!
Superb video. Please consider slowing your delivery a bit. It is difficult to keep up with your info. Thanks!
Watch the video at .75x speed
8th and only 17 minutes late, I have heard the British were respectful of the region. One wonders whether an outsider ought to manage it.
This analysis is too granular… but an excellent way to relive the zeitgeist prior to the establishment of the state of Israel.
This is is like listening to an essay on slavery suggesting that it was a pro black institution
What you’re saying is…. You don’t like facts.
Lmao so delusional
Lol spot on.
@@Drigger95 Tell me you have a
@bdawg-qj9bq oh no! My IQ is low because I don't support settler colonialism and ethnic cleansing. Those are BIG BRAIN things of course. So is the holocaust. Only BIG BRAIN aryans get it bro.
I love how the people living there made an agreement to divide the land, then somehow it does get divided, but between France and the UK.
I am grateful for this objective recount of events which is nonetheless sympathetic to either side when deserved, and at the same time disquieted to see some adopt genocidal Nazism when it will serve their turn, an attitude they have not renounced.
Jews act like genocidal nazis to Palestinians, but then use Marxism in Europe to soft genocide the place by mutting it out via mass migration and mixing
Notice, jews hold no real beliefs, they will switch to nazism, fascism, Marxism, and capitalism based on whatever benefits them best, and regardless of sect believes they all stand together actively against a world mostly indifferent of their existence (unnecessary hostile attitude jews hold)
@@folkishappalachian6827pure unhinged schizophrenic rambling. Based on 0 evidence. Jew hatred is a mental illness as you demonstrate so effectively.
lol its clearly biased
@@pancakeho0e sure pancake
"I want to tell you about my heritage" - plot twist; it's an advert. 😅
Yeah he got me in the first half, not gonna lie
Welp. More history in progress
Why do people always leave out Jordan in the mandate?
This is an excellent article, I’ve read a great deal on the topic’s of the history of the region. I’m so glad you point out the violence and corruption within the Arab elite in the 20’s and 30’s. Much of the retelling of history in the region is this abominable Nabkha where the Arabs were thrown off their land and disenfranchised where the history is that Jews bought much of the land legally .
They bought 3% of the land
@@jchan97615.67% by 4/1/1945.
More than this but not stoled. 80 percent of lands were empty and abandoned as today @@jchan9761
This video is a real eye opener!
Besides the fact that it was Hindenburg who was president of the Weimar republic and died in 1934( Ludendorff was in self-imposed exile after the beer hall putsch of 1923 in the Nordic countries and died in 1937) this is a very good video
Herbert Samuel the first jew to hold a cabinet position in Britain ?!
Not quite.
Indeed it was Benjamin Disraeli,a discendant of sephardic jews,who in the 19th century even was Prime Minister.
17:24 Arab Palestinians did not exist yet.
37:58 also here
Otherwise, pretty accurate.
Actually they did , they even had a Palestinian citizenship, and they were literally called Arab palestinians , stop twisting history
@@alexk8993you're referring to the British mandate of Palestine which was tasked with the goal of establishing the JEWISH national home not ARAB. The only people eho referred to themselves as "Palestinians" before 1948 were Jews.
@@ajvorob9117 dude stfu the Arabs in Palestine already started to identify as Palestinians with a Palestinian nationalism since the very first day of the mandate, and even before, the Palestinians were the people of Palestine who are mainly Arabs , just like how there were Iraqi jews , Syrian jews , Moroccan jews , there were also Palestinian jews, but palestinians is a term to describe the inhabitants of Palestine who are mainly arabs.
Even David Ben Gurioun called the Palestinians as Arab palestinians , u can find it in this video
@@alexk8993 There were Arabs who lived in the British Mandate of Palestine but no Arab Palestinian identity before 1948.
Before 1948, the Jews were the Palestinians. Case in point is the former name of the Jerusalem Post, which was the Palestine Post. Or the British calling to split the mandate territory between one state for the Jews and another for the Arabs. No mention of a state for the Palestinians.
The Palestinian identity only coalesced after the establishment of Israel to antagonize the Jews.
What’s crazy is before the 20th century us Muslims the Jews and Christian’s all lived among each other without major conflict I truly think the best solution is making Jerusalem the international capital and have un troops guard it and use international law now for the rest of the country split it up between Israel and Palestine
Maybe we should make Istanbul an international city, and Mekka and Medina, how so? No, Jerusalem is Israel's capital.
yea it's almost like zionists ruined it all. oh wait they did.
Might have been an option at one point, but that ship has sailed now. There is no way an Israeli prime minister will want the loss of the Jewish control of Jerusalem to be their legacy.
meh not really, Arabs dominated everyone and everything.
The best solution is two states with their existing borders and Jerusalem as the Israeli capital
It really would have been helpful to include the period from 1870 to 1917 in the discussion.
You forgot to mention that the new Jewish landowners, primarily the Jewish Agency, actively worked to evict tenant farmers from their newly-acquired lands, thereby pushing many peasants (“fellahin”) to support the 1936 revolt against the British and fuel anti-Jewish violence . So land acquisitions, even if they were done through the landowning class in the region, were not completely benign and helped to impoverish the Palestinian peasantry, who were the majority of the population. Also, you seem to insinuate that the majority of the Palestinian Arab press was just pure propaganda drivel. This is a very biased video.
Definitely today the Palestinian press if you can call it that is 100 percent pure propaganda. I don’t know about back then but logically it was probably still pretty biased
Actually the Zionists paid reparations to every tenant farmer affected by the land purchase. And eviction is 100% legal as they did not actually own the land. The absentee landlords could have found alternative land for the tenant farmers but they didn't. Instead all the responsibility fell on the Jewish buyers. Which they did.
If anything the Arabs became richer through Jewish land purchases and settlement. The tenant farmer no longer needed to be tied down to a land he had no heart or stomach to work for and could learn other trades. Not to mention they had to pay exorbitant rents to the absentee landlords. It was essentially a medieval feudal system which Zionism helped abolish. The poverty of the fellaheen was largely due to the collusion between the ottoman government, absentee landlords, and the Arab effendi class.
The Arab press constantly claimed that Jewish land purchases massively displaced the Arab tenant farmers. But in reality the amount of actual displacement was very low. During the British mandate Era, over 3000 claims of alleged displacement were filed and only 600 of them were considered valid. Of those valid claims, half accepted resettlement and the others refused.
Read "The Claim of Disposession "
Not to mention that even after the tenant farmers received compensation and agreed to move elsewhere, they attacked the Jews when they started plowing land that they legally bought. That's like a man purchasing a farm from another farm owner and compensating the former workers at the farm. Then when the man tries to put his own workers on the farm, they're attacked by the former workers. How is that in any way fair?
You accept financial compensation and still try to attack people who legally purchased the land? That's barbaric nonsense that no sane person can claim is justifiable. It's not a reason to murder. Legal eviction does not give you a right to kill. By that logic, people who are evicted from homes because they can't pay the mortgage have a right to murder people.
#freebiafranow...🙏💫
finally a fair video among all the anti Israeli garbage, massive kudos for mention the weissman-faisal agreement, a massively underdiscussed document, demonstrating that in some ways, the conflict was resolved before it began, since the British did not keep their agreement with Faisal it was moot, but the basic idea that this is not some insane unresolvable conflict is much more important
Israel is a modern apartheid state they learned well from germany
@@roxylius7550 South Africans disagree.
@@roxylius7550 repeating a lie does not make it true
@@yurig2530 they literally have different road and license plat for israeli and arab.
@@bobg9 they literally have different road and license plat for israeli and arab.
Thanks again for sharing
The Jewish people are *indigenous* to Judea - Land of Israel. 🕎🙌
After over 2 millennia of forced exile, persecution, and genocide, the *(re)establishment* of *Jewish sovereignty* in our *ancestral homeland* is a remarkable story of *national liberation.* Jewish claims to the land are far more than biblical accounts. Our *religion, language, culture, holidays, rituals, liturgy, history,* and even the words Jew and Jewish are all inseparable from *historical Judea* and our collective longing to *return to the Land of Israel.*
The land of Israel is where Jews became *a people* and the *oldest monotheistic faith.* It is where Jews *achieved sovereignty* before losing it and regaining it several times until much of the *indigenous Jewish population* was either killed or forced into exile following the *Roman Empire’s* brutal suppression of the heroic *Jewish revolt* in the second century of the Common Era. Though the Romans subsequently *renamed the land* Syria Palaestina, the Jewish people *never left* our homeland physically or spiritually. *Archaeological evidence* of Jewish life can be found in more than *30,000 sites* in Israel with antiquities dating back centuries. Even when we were massacred and persecuted by Christian Crusaders, Arab and Ottoman *invaders,* the British-led Jordanian Arab Legion, or more recently Hamas suicide bombers and rockets, our attachment *never* wavered.
It is in this same land where Jews miraculously *revitalized* the Hebrew language, *rebuilt* the institutions necessary for independence, *re-engaged* in rituals that are uniquely observed in the land of Israel, *redeveloped* the land and the economy so that by several magnitudes the Jewish and non-Jewish populations grew, and offered refuge not just to the remnant which survived the Holocaust, but also millions of Jews fleeing persecution from the Muslim Middle East, Ethiopia, and the former Soviet Union.
Today, Israel is a *rich tapestry of diverse citizens,* including over half of Jewish Israelis who identify as Jews of color and 20% of whom are Arab citizens.
*Peace Not Hate!* 🇮🇱💙
What you are saying is total nonsense you are nothing more than European colonizers
True
@@ajvorob9117 fallce
Great video... good work
Thank you so much for sharing the with us the the unbiased facts and objective history
so biased, so subjective -- I presume for the side that you favor, but at least acknowledge the bias & subjectivity.
That's the problem with idealogs neither side can think that they're biased or subjective
@@monsieurcharcutier4490I feel like a lot of the side of the Palestinians downplay and ignore the fact the Arabs wanted the jews wiped off the map, instead of trying to live peacefully and work out a plan to live together. Which is an important point that changes the framework of the conflict completely
His twitter has the Israeli flag in it, I'd re think the "unbiased" label. I suggest the "Fear and Loathing in the new Jerusalem" instead.
From a certain angle, I kinda feel like the speaker looks like Jesse Plemons (Todd from Breaking Bad), only when he doesn't...
regardless of one's heritage, honesty is one, truth is one, there are no two different truths or honesty... just as a truly honest parent brings to justice his/her own offspring if it commits a crime. Facts are facts: Jews AND Arabs both lived in the land called Palestine. Both have the right to exist as a State. A few borders between the two States have been proposed, all accepted by the Jews, and all repudiated by the Arabs, who could have had a much bigger territory that what is now the Gaza and the West Bank territories... They refused because they want to exterminate the Jews... at this point, who can honestly blame the Jews from responding in tune?
Anyone with a brain and has knowledge beyond propaganda.
exactly! you didn't include "intellectual honesty", therefore you are excluding yourself, aren't you?@@TahaAlZadjali
You are correct
Jew hatred is enshrined in the vile ideology of islam.
islam is the reason there is no peace in the Middle East ...... PERIOD ..... and no, I am not Jewish but I do stand firmly in their support.
@@claudiotaginifacts: before the British mandate only 7% of the Palestinian population was Jewish, so they certainly had the right to live in those lands, but not the immigrant Jews. Any state would have refused to divide its territory with foreign immigrants, especially since the final proposal envisaged 56% of Palestine to a minority of 33% of the population who bought only 7% of the land. If the Arabs would have wanted to exterminate the Jews they would have done so when they were still a small minority, so if they opposed Israel it was not out of hatred towards the Jews, but hatred towards the invaders, a hatred that any people in the same situation would have had.
Great content. Thank you!
We all gotta learn to coexist and live together in secular democracy
lol please find one of those where arabs rule.
@@MoonMage67 they coexist just fine in our secular democracy, plenty of Arabs and Jews living together in NY no problem
Because they have no choice lol@@democracyboys
@@democracyboys Those who immigrate are normally more suitable for the destination then those who stayed.
Abolish Christmas then?
The fear the Arabs stated of a few becoming too many, very too quickly then ending in bloodshed is in religious text.
If remembered from my classes.
Leaving from the starving peninsula, to the Moorish Battles, the Eygptian exodus, and all the inbetweens. The stuff that did not cast a bright light or long enough shadow.
Palestine is a Tik-Tok country only. Ha-ha-ha
true!!!! lol
Hey @casualhostorian, is there any way you'd be willing to do a video analyzing Norman Finkelstein's perspective/claims, and whether his scholarly work should be taken seriously or whether he's a propagandist?
The mandate territory included what became the kingdom of jordan, so this starting map is not objective. This video is a very biased perspective
This is so irrelevant
You shouldn't be using the modern Palestinian flag to represent the Arabs in the pre-state years. It was created in 1964, and the Arabs didn't have a flag before then.
That’s what it became. 🤷🏿♂️
So why not?
Nationalism of arabic "race", as it was created by usa, Britain and France (basically nato of the end of ww1), is just the byproduct of said divisions caused by the western fascist colonizers. We will use the palestinian flag because it represents what palestinians have in their culture thag unites them, which is surviving the nakba. So, that's why we pro palestinians love this flag and will wear them till palestinians are equal to jews.
it was the flag of arab nationalism which started in ottoman era
45:30 you've mistaken that for Hindenburg's death
If the Palestinians just left the area and moved into a fellow Muslim country, there would be peace
Not in the country they moved to (see Jordan, Lebanon, Syria....)
Nobody can second-guess God
Yeah just accept being ethnically cleansed and give up their homes. You are such a joke its not even funny.
Yea
Well said.
Nationalism was gaining popularity in Europe too which made the Arabs seen as second class citizens in the Ottoman Empire.
As a descendant of persecuted jews and a kz-lager survivor... While this video might be factually accurate, it is still extremely biased against Arabs. Where is the mentioning of the goals of some of the settlers to establish a state that explicitly excluded the local population?
oh shut up, lol I love that you acknowledge its factual tho, yes its biased because the facts are in fact biased. the arabs dislike the facts because of that. so just stay quiet.
Probably because Arab propaganda is based on myths and falsehoods. Hence why actual facts is damaging to their delusional fantasies. You're almost there.
And the zionists certainly wanted Arabs to stay put. Their reasoning was that the cultivation and rejuvenation of the land will benefit them economically . Which it did.
@@ajvorob9117I am sorry the jews didn't not have right to collonize arab land
@@ajvorob9117said is the one who supports a colonial state just becouse your holy books said so .I am sorry but you are delusional not the Arabs
VERY well made video. i'm gonna watch the entire seiries of yours. since im an israeli jew and it interests me