Hey dude, I dont know if you are aware of this, but there is a channel copying your videos and uploading them in spanish. This same video was uploaded 4 days after and its completely identical except for the translation. channel is called "Explicado en Paint".
You messed up “Lolita” it’s actually about a child SA victim’s idea of how the perpetrator thought. The child represents the author, & the main character is the abuser.
48 laws of power is a book everyone in a corporate job should read. Not so much so that you can take advantage of others, but so you can identify when others are taking advantage of you
Nabokov was not writing Lolita as a person with “sick fantasies,” he wrote is as a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, getting into the mind of a perpetrator because he’d been on the receiving end, not because he wanted to do stuff to kids.
@@delaneybenlon6106 Bro, Nabokov literally have autobiography book. Need sources? Read it, don't seek anyone to tell you their truth and how they percieve thing and how you should too.
Lolita is… not at all a work of Nabokov’s fantasies. It’s a fucking inditement of everything in the book. He tried to destroy the manuscript several times because he was disgusted at the man he had written, but was reassured by his wife that it had to be published because it shed light on the types of people who commit these kinds of atrocities. The book has the consistent subtext that Humbert is a monster, only barely shrouded by the fact that Humbert is the narrator.
Lolita isn't supposed to be taken as glorifying the protagonist's obsession with Delores, it's supposed to be showing how much a terrible person will bend over backwards to justify his course of action. It's told from the point of view of an unreliable narrator.
Vladimir Nabokov was very against ped0s. The whole point of this book was about how humbert was an unreliable narrator and how he neglected to share certain information to appear better than he actually is. He spent the whole time trying to manipulate the readers. If you actually had common sense you would realise this. Yes society segualised the book but that completely missed the point. Nabokov stretched the point that Dolores was just an innocent little girl taken victim by a horrible horrible man. Nabokov even wanted no girls to be present in the cover of Lolita he just wanted plain words or a landscape. This book was certainly not an apologist book.
@@human1834 the public opinion of the book disagrees with you, and that is what matters in this circumstance. All I see is you attempting to plant seeds. It's disgusting.
@@northernmetalworker Got long.. Seems like the average person have bad media literacy then. Just because something makes the majority uncomfortable, that doesn't mean the majority is right. We disabled people make the majority feel uncomfortable. Some want to lock us up (pathetic and cowardly). Sometimes, the majority kind of deserve to feel uncomfortable. The more they ignore problems, the worse it will get. While I haven't even read Lolita, I do know it's about how much some people justify their behavior. I can't compare that topic with how people treat us disabled people, but a lot of people are willing to go really far to justify their internalizing attitudes towards us and never learn from their mistakes while we have to use all of our energy to go more than half the way when we want to meet in the middle. Ignoring something really uncomfortable usually have serious consequences. I wish less people acted so cowardly and didn't hide behind peer pressure. It makes them looks so unreliable.. 😬
Fun fact: When Animal farm was published and became popular both communist and western governments saw it as anti communist or anti capitalist, the reality is that its anti-authoritarian.
There's a book called Success Secrets Of The Elite, it talks about how using some secret techniques you can attract a lot of money, it's not some bullshit, it's the real deal. Great video btw
Bet you he did it on purpose to increase engagement. From the pov of the algorithm, every comment is a good comment. He even made me comment. I've been bamboozled
@@KirosanaPerkele someone has to write a book on how to evade the algorithm and be able to recognise social bubbles you are getting dragged into on the internet.
@KirosanaPerkele People heavily overrate the importance of engagement. It's far better to build a good reputation because that way it's much easier for you to monetize your audience.
@@Timmy-mi2ef Be that as it may, this guy isn't doing what you say. He has another video about drugs and comments are full of people explaining how he got everything wrong
I think the Anarchist's Cookbook is kinda cameoed in Fallout, where it's subsequently and kinda ironically renamed the _Patriot's Cookbook_ by the Pre-war government. Finding it ingame and reading it will give you temporary +10 to Explosives💀
XD im ngl. I have read it cause you can find a scanned version online in library archives and i feel like it should've given you more then just a boost in explosives lol
Ever played The Binding Of Isaac? It's a really common item there... But also, the game covers all satanic/holy disturbing books, pills, etc... so no wonder.
Great video, but your interpretation of Lolita is wrong, it’s a coming misconception that the author is just a creep and it’s supposed to be some taboo love story, really it’s intended to be a psychological thriller by brining you into the delusional world of a child predator
This is making me wonder if he's using cunningham's law to learn more about these books by giving out wrong information in hopes that people in the comments will correct him and tell him the right information.
Everyone here is telling the actual story of Lolita,while I’ll just add that as a Russian,i find it funny that in Russia like…literally EVERYONE knew what Lolita is about.This book just falls to the type of the book that was so revolutionary that it got her a bad reputation.Even the japanese word for Loli basically comes from it
Fun fact. Animal farm was banned in USA for being "pro communist" and in soviet union as for being "pro capitalist". Edit: sorry I mistook it for another Orwell's anti utopian book called 1984. It is similar to animal farm, but it is longer and I would say more dystopian (both of them are great and deserve attention tho)
Animal farm portraits communism very good. Every communist leader in history acted like he would change society in a positive way and get rid of the class based system, but in reality, it was always just another dictator, inventing a new class system based on loyalty and ideology. Justice always has been subjective within communist states, depending on the leading figures mind, which also makes the idea of this ideology a sole hoax. Unfortunately, especially looking at some stereotypical students nowadays, humanity doesn't seem to be keen on learning regarding this topic.
@@ianmartinesq remember why the animals revolt in the first place. They're rebelling against a capitalist/imperialist hellscape but inadvertently create a communist/imperialist hellscape in opposition to such.
@@ianmartinesq The kind of people who want to curtail expression in democratic societies tend to have difficulty recognizing satire, parody, subtext, or context. As true back then as it is today, I'm afraid.
I saw someone else comment that they felt this video was written (at least in part) by AI, and I can't help agreeing. Having read many of these books, the summaries given are superficial and surface-level at best and simply incorrect at worst. A lot of these incorrect assertions make it obvious this creator hasn't actually read the books in question, and the way it dodges the nuance and context behind something like Lolita in favor of what would definitely be an AI-generated interpretation has me thinking there's no other explanation. A lot of people mentioned Lolita but I want to talk about Slaughterhouse Five, which was touted as time travel novel + Dresden = make love not war. There is no time travel in this novel, Billy Pilgrim is experiencing the perspective that the fourth dimension offers, in which, like the tralfamadorians who abduct him, he perceives the past, present, and future simultaneously, and his life events are told out of order to reflect this. Of course, the book is anti-war in nature, and someone who actually researched the novel would probably mention in a video like this that Vonnegut was himself at Dresden, and this novel is more potently anti-war because of it. Calling it a 'hippie manifesto' is outrageous, and I also appreciate how aliens are mentioned simply as "this book has aliens" while saying nothing about the nature of the tralfamadorians or Billy's time as a zoo exhibit (again, a video essay like this would definitely have at least mentioned it). Just my two cents, this video is either definitely AI and/or the creator is an extremely lazy researcher...also, the title of this video is literally clickbait, this was like 10 banned books and not 'Every'.
Haven't read slaughterhouse-five. But from your comment I gotta admire how smart it is to explain experiencing different time periods as "fourth dimension effect". I went to Google and the book was published a couple decades after special relativity so this science fiction uses actual physics convictions (the universe being 3+1 dimensions and time being the +1). A little irrelevant, but I admire this detail.
@@jamesholland8057 which is why i said common fetish. We can be sure that it was common back then, but wasn't mainstream because there was no internet back then.
Also, i heard that if nabokov had a daughter, lolita would be a boy because he just couldn't write about molesting a girl. Uh, sorry for my english. And i don't know about the source, -trust me bro-
It's more directly referencing the Spanish civil war with how the Marxist revolutionaries became just as bad as Franco's government Orwell even says in the preface it was based on his experiences participating in the conflict
@@lordgod9958dude you dont even know what the spanish civil war was about xD Franco was the one doing a coup detat and the legitimate government was the one closer to marxism
he did an absolute disservice to slaughterhouse five in this vid, Vonnegut is telling us a story about his experiences through a fictional character, Billy Pilgrim. the sci-fi elements and the aliens is from billy’s mind being the only way he can process the trauma. dresden was a fire bombing, so bad that people were being boiled alive in the river and when they opened the one bomb shelter (dresden was thought to be safe because of its hospitals, POW and civilian population, they were pretty withdrawn from the war if i remember correctly) it was “a green and brown sludge”, they melted in the shelter because of the heat. he only survived from being in a slaughterhouse which at that time was tens of feet deep underground. Slaughterhouse Five is not a hippie anti war book, but a tragedy that was being covered up by the USA military.
It’s also a horrible read. If you don’t know that his PTSD is what’s causing the time traveling from the beginning it’s a huge headache to try and wrap your head around, and he can’t go a single chapter without inserting himself into a random scene or going off on some tangent about homosexuality. If you want a “war is bad” story do yourself a favor and just watch saving private ryan.
Watching this as someone from a country that doesn't ban books, it seems dystopian to ban books in its own right. Most of these books seem to be banned due to criticism of the government, which is quite absurd for a country that calls itself "Land of the free". Free to read state approved literature, I guess..
Lolita’s point being missed completely because people didn’t realise it’s written in with an unreliable narrator in mind. Which I mean, fair. When you read a book you usually expect it to be from a third person perspective. But since it’s like with Humbert in mind, it’s supposed to highlight how said character would twist his mind to justify his love
For a youtube channel called "the analyst" you clearly have no idea what these books were about or why they were really banned. It sounds like you just read from the wiki entries for all of these
@@hibosmodude you have literally been flamed in these other comments for your misinterpretation of Lolita as well as your absurd sub par understanding of slaughterhouse five. Go look at the other comments with hundreds of likes explaining why this video sucks lmao. Maybe put a little more effort into the script next time
I had to read the book in year 9, still own it now. It's a fascinating read, tbh Still creeps me out constantly, especially when it comes to what happens to Boxer (I think that was the horse's name)
120 Days of Sodom actually got a movie adaptation. The movie is considered the sickest of all time by critics, and the director was murdered by the mafia 3 weeks before the movie released, where he was planning to negotiate to some thieves that stole film rolls of the movie. The mafia then pinned the murder on a guy driving the director's car, and it wasnt until 2005 that the guy admitted the mafia told him to confess.
hi, just to add something: the truth behind Pasolini's murder is still unknown. While a lot of people and theories agree on the framed guy not being the actual murderer, we still can't be sure on what really happened behind the scenes. Pasolini was, in that period, one of the most influencial intellectuals in Italy and had a lot of enemies both in the governament and in the biggest companies. 70' and 80' where difficult years in italian politics and what really happened behind the scenes is still unclear and being debated. This just to say that mafia could be implied in the murder but we aren't sure if they were only the material murderers and someone ordered them to do it. (Sorry for my english, i'm italian and it's not my first language)
I guess this video references the time when it was banned during the war. The parallels to Stalin and his paranoia and unlawful rule were pretty obvious, so the allies banned it during the war to not rock the boat
fun fact! 120 days of sodom has a movie! i watched it with my cousin and we stopped at the end because the end was so afwul. its way worse then he explained its truly afwul especially the torture at the end
Lolita is not a love story or a reflection of Nabokov's fetish, despite what popular culture will tell you. It is and was always meant to be a tragedy, something that both Nabokov and his wife stated on multiple occasions. Nabokov reportedly considered a scene where Humbert "realizes, with a shock, that amid the “musical vibration” that lifts from a valley below him, [Lolita's] voice is plangently missing from the melody of children at play" to be one of his favorites and one of the novel's most important passages. "That absence impresses on him the gravity of his crime, the past that he has failed to retrieve, the future that he has interrupted." (Stacy Schiff, "Véra Nabokov Was the First and Greatest Champion of 'Lolita'"). Nabokov's wife Véra commented that many reviewers failed to see past the nymphet persona Humbert has imposed over Dolores, missing her “complete loneliness in the whole world” and “the tender description of the child’s helplessness, her pathetic dependence on monstrous Humbert Humbert, and her heartrending courage all along.” "She cries every night," Véra wrote, "and the critics are deaf to her sobs.” The tragedy and monstrosity of the situation is the point of the novel, not "how [Nabokov] is dying to experience some sick pleasures" as you stated in the video.
I think that Nabokov inadvertently stumbled on this horrific fact that most people are subtle pe**s, quick to stone anyone who gets caught (or talks about it) in order to disguise themselves. That would explain the persistence of pe**a, its emergence in certain historical settings, at certain times, or at certain locations, throughout all kinds of social classes, and even among sacred/religious people (go figure). It would explain the secret societies, child trafficking, the wrong recension of the book in this video (likely AI generated), and this guy Ludwig August Robert Rasch marrying a 15 yo while pretending to be German administrator of Nauru, a small Pacific island, in the 19th century.
If critics are deaf to her sobs, it’s because HH never shuts the fuck up about himself long enough to hear over the sound of his own voice. While i can grasp the literary elements of this story, it became a tedious read bc the reader spends time ad nauseum with HH & his inner snobbish thoughts throughout the entirety of the book (imagine that, a story with a pedophiliac protagonist and my biggest complaint is that he is a dreadful bore!) *Of course, with Percival Everett giving a voice to Jim in his book James, it’s probably only a matter of time before anyone gives a voice to Lolita in his/her as-yet-to-be-written book Dolores* Now i know the counterpoint will be that Lolita is a 1st Person Narrative so obviously the protagonist will be the only perspective within the book; however, i think of the 1st person narrative of Huckleberry Finn… and, how often he disappears within his own story. That’s brilliant! And something that Nabokov never really mastered in his book. No, once you push pass the sensationalism of the pedophilia, the story emerges. And, it’s a shame that Nabokov culminated his characters into sexual deviance when that aspect was wholly unnecessary; better if he had HH traversing the United States while repressing a sexual desire for this young girl; we the readers would be having a largely more interesting discussion about this book if Nabokov had painted allusions of HH’s passion for Lolita rather than outright forcing them into sexual trysts. Rather, the story is about a foreigner’s bewildering, detestable attraction to The States which he can’t explain to himself, and the best way to exemplify this confusion is through the experiences of a teenage American girl; when HH doesn’t understand Dolores’ obsessions with comics and celebrity magazines and plasticky sundaes and cornball movies, it’s truly an insight into Nabokov’s foreign viewpoint on America; she’s the younger virginal America, he is the older outdated Europe. He wants to mold her into being a European with tennis lessons, she excels at the sport but could care less about it at the same time. What gives the story away for me is when HH is talking about how the mountains in America don’t compare to the mountains of Europe, but how he has no desire to return to those European mountains again. His failing is that he never quite realizes that the love within him is bastardized.
You're also wrong about invisible man- it is banned to this day in school libraries, but not because of racial politics, but because it contains scenes of rape and incest that parents have felt school children aren't mature enough to handle
I read it and grapes of wrath in high school 2 years ago and both were assigned so I don’t think it’s still banned and if it is well then I have some people I need to talk to
One thing about Slaughterhouse-Five: it was by no means a “sneaky” attempt at an anti-war novel, it was BLATANTLY an anti-war novel. Like Kurt Vonnegut wrote it using his witnessing of the bombing of Dresden as a base. (also, the main character travels through different points in his own life, randomly, not just from one time period to the next)
Lolita isn't supposed to justify or romanticize pedophilia, it's supposed to show how twisted bad people are and how much they'll try to justify their actions. It also shows how hard it is to tell good from bad for the most part.
Anarchist cookbook is funny to me, half the recipes are wrong or don't really work and the army already has their own improvised munitions handbook that's much more accurate. It really is the "rebellious teen" book.
I'm convinced the purpose of the book was to be a "false flag" or bait of sorts. I don't think it was made by real anarchists who intended to arm people with radical tactics, i think it was written by the feds to see who picked up the book knowing they can track down and trace the spread of it and its full of stuff thats either useless or outright dangerous to the reader moreso than any authority or state. I'm no field expert by amy means but It's just too laughably bad to be serious to me, many other commenters have already mention the vietnam era edition of the improvised munitions handbook being leagues superior, and it's also never been banned or particularly hard to access, any military man would have it and be able to give it to someone and now it's on pdf right now for free. The AC even reads like what some edgy loser 20 something would say to impress some naive teens who aren't old enough to tell how cringey he is yet. Maybe it is real idk, i mean anarchists are known for stereotypically being like that but I really wouldn't be surprised if it was made by feds to be bait either. Much furor over such a useless book makes me question it.
The point of Lolita was to show the awful machinations and narcisism of a child predator who believes what they're doing is right. It also shows how moronic average people are who assume its an edgy love story and not a book about the horrible world view of Humbert. I truly beleive people who cannot understand that Humbert is supposed to be the villain and an unreliable source are delusional and deserve the the same scruitiny as people who see it as a love story. This book should be used as a lesson in litterary comprehension.
@@gabrielho1874 Agreed. I think banning and censorship of art/litterature only empowers the ideas you fear. We should be studying and breaking down the ideas of these works to scrutinize it properly as a collective. See why the ideas disgust us and how to avoid or unstand how to deal with these issues. This is evident enough with this book being banned and censored to appeal to people about a subject that was never meant to be appealing. People who see Lolita as anything but the delusions of an egotistical predator to romanticize his sick actions are the same as Humbert when it comes to perceptions of the girl. Showing the mental gymnastics the reader has to soften the cruelty of the protagonist so they don't feel bad about reasing the book. "Humbert was so lovey dovey, it's like a Romio Juliet scenario where Juliet is just stuck up". Sickening mindest to ponder people having.
@@anglosaxiphone8246 apparently the film fumbled exploring the theme as perspectives isn't easy to do on film as with books. The child actress also does not want anything to do with the film which is understandable.
In South Korea, illustrated simplified versions of Animal Farm are a standard part of many children's classics book sets. With Kim up North, society probably want their youth to see the problems with leaders like that early.
You can’t seriously believe that is the only evil in that peninsula. There are a few major families in South Korea that control the entire country, like Samsung.
We read Animal Farm as part of the curriculum in South Africa, crazy to think it would be banned in a whole country while it's literally for highschool children in another
I clicked on this for a single book to hear what he said about it, and he gets the themes and intention completely wrong and twists it (Lolita). Dang. Edit: This is the only video of this channel I’ve watched, but the poor accuracy of these book descriptions combined with the channel’s super frequent upload schedule leads me to believe scripts are written with AI.
I think he made the script with AI since at least some parts sounds like what AI has given me for a few books, so the AI could just be hallucinating things about the books and getting it wrong
he glosses over major details of other books too, like how the protagonist of slaughterhouse 5 is “time traveling” because of his ptsd. calling it a hopscotch through time is a bit of an oversimplification
The Anarchist Cookbook 0:00 The Satanic Verses 1:13 120 Days of Sodom 3:01 Lady Chatterley’s Lover 4:05 48 Laws of Power 5:28 Lolita 6:51 Brave New World 8:25 Animal Farm 9:56 The Grapes of Wrath 11:17 Slaughterhouse 5 12:30 Invisible Man 13:51
If the prison are worried about “48 laws” will turn inmates into “master manipulators” and prison into game of thrones then someone might have to break the news that they’re a little late lol.
On the next episode of reality the inmates will recreate the feeling of courtroom dramas inspired by sensationalist media *FIND OUT WHO'S INNOCENT AND WHO'S GUILTY!!!* My inspiration for this comment came from the gta Iv radio stations , as mentioned, oversaturated early 2000s "reality" TV shows such as jerry, maury, steve wilkos, and paternity court.
48 Laws of Power isn't even correct or well written for a large percentage of the laws. It's really obvious when someone tries to weaponize most of them because they're wrong or incomplete.
I am pretty sure that Nabokov wasn't a p#do, but Humbert humbert sure was. The author on his own wanted to show how men he knew behave in front of young girls, I am not sure but I do not want people to spread misinformation about nabokov writin' the book to please himself!
He wrote lolita due to the trauma of his father being killed turing a terrorist attck by sergei taboritsky who later joined the SS and founded the russian SS youth.
I heard he was abused himself and when he saw an abducted young girl being portrayed as the villain who ruined a man's life he decided to write the book. It was never meant to be a love story or to sexualise children.
There were so many angles to take on Lolita, but taking the easy one like this shuts people down. The author wrote this book about how twisted these child predators get in their thinking to justify the wrong things they do. Remember that everyone thinks they are “the good guy”, especially if they are doing something wrong.
@@Lua_You And yet this video is still up, with the mistakes that everyone and their grandmum pointed out, because the channel clearly doesn't give a fuck.
"48 Laws of Power" kind of reminds me of "The Prince" by Machiavelli. It was a book written for royal princes to teach them how to rule their kingdom and manipulate their populace to ensure compliance even through less than ethical means. I read somewhere that it was very secretly written as a warning for the common folk as well since Machiavelli had some outstanding grievances with the crown and also that the book was mass produced in the common vernacular of Italy... that everyone could read.
Told someone I was reading Animal Farm when he said he’d read the book I gave him (Diary of a young girl). He told me I was too old to read kids books. I literally can’t with this man 💀
I made the same mistake when I was a bored eight year old and picked up the big book with the animal on the cover That probably had a lot of effect on my personality growing up
@@CornflowerBlue10 Probably? I mean it did give me a lot of insight on things like how propaganda can look like and how totalitarian regimes can end up happening, didn't fully comprehend everything at that age but I did learn stuff However it also probably made me a little more cynical and a bit paranoid which isn't always good Animal Farm is a great and educational read but I think I could've waited a bit until I had the proper context
@@G2000_the_viewer rookie shit Pipebomb, meth, Multiple nuclear reactor tutorials, a few home made guns, and military documents (All of these except for the reactor prob are fake and as a joke)
Someone needs to mention how about 75% of the recipes in that book aren't even practical or in some cases at all possible. It's not any more dangerous to some authority than google is
So funny little thing about Lady Chatterley's Lover is there was a rumour that could have been distorted over the generations. Lawrence was born in my hometown of Eastwood, and when you hear stories from older people who got stories from their grandparents, it was often said that D.H. Lawrence was a very sour man who caused people to actively avoid him as soon as they saw him. One thing they were notably afraid of was being slandered in his works, and it was believed that the Lady Chatterley was in fact a real person of high-standing who was the subject of such slander. A conference hall and hotel in town is said to be where the estate in the story took place, and there's a pub in the middle of town called the Lady Chatterley.
Animal farm is so much more. It mimics history, with each character representing a different part of the soviet revolution for example, the Farmers next door represent the Austrian painter who invades russia or the dogs that kill protestors representing the KGB/secret police. The book ends with the pigs and humans playing cards round a table and the pigs becoming bipedal. It's about how absolute power corrupts absolutely. All the animals have short life spans and only a few remember what life was even like before the revolution
It's disturbing how many people think someone is a horrible person just because one of the characters in a book is a creep or something.. It's like saying "if you can think of something creepy and disturbing, you're a creep." That would be almost everyone by default. What kind of logic are people even using??
This also effects other media, movies and games included. You will never see an American playing the villain, potentially because of hollywood propoganda. But also because they experiance harrasment. Thats why you often get foriengers in that positions. This forms an unhealthy view of other countries. An example of this is the video game "Red Dead Redemption 2" of which is considered masterpiece of fiction specifically for the main cast mainly the player character, Arthur. Now this is a sequal game, and he and other members dont appear again. So they have to be offd in one way or the other. Now our villain (the one who was harrased). Michah bell, is as described by many "a bottom feeding rat" who while unlikeable throughout the 1st half. Gaines a foothold to manipulate many cat members. Leading to a emotionally draining betrayel. The actor was harrassed and sent death threats because of his amazing performance.
10:50 Actually Animal farm doesn’t just poke fun at power hungry leaders it’s been crafted specifically to poke fun of Russian/Soviet politics as it was aimed at the USSR
Ive heard i more 'right leaning' areas of America they are banned, with many people who want it banned not even reading it. Often because the instigater of the ban uses the magic words of "socilist, anti-captilist/american, or hereasy"
@@ayouxy What a waste of time, even if the internet didn't just tell you when you want to know. The information to make a bomb becomes obvious when you see the instructions for how to not accidentally blow yourself up when handling certain materials.
The anarchist cookbook is a plant btw. A lot of the recipes are described in a way that blow up instantly. Also it’s basically just used as a way to quadruple any sentence you have. If the feds raid ur home and find it, it will be used against you. I recommend the improvised munitions handbook in stead
48 powers of law is my favorite book of all time i don’t think it makes u manipulate ppl it just makes u see life from a different perspective and it teaches you how to “finesse” life basically or finesse someone who’s tryna finesse u😉
It is inspired by Aldus Huxley's book, however, the story of Brave New World tells the experience of a man taken from a human zoo that experiences the dystopian life after his release
One book I really expected to see is Mein Kamph "My struggle" by Adolf Hitler, volume 1 and, or volume 2 too, and one book that isn't banned, but is just as controversial and similar to some of the books, (covering controversial and dislike topics), is American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World by David E. Stannard, I'm really not sure if you already made videos on these 2 books because I haven't really looked at your channel, but I doubt that because from what I can tell, you made videos about a group of things that are similar under one topic, thank you, bye.
It was absolutely crazy that it didn't get mentioned AT ALL Most of these books can kind of teach you something important about life or just be a psychological horror Or are actually bad for people but not THAT bad Making them highly controversial at worst On the other hand Mein Kampf was agreed by many people to be just "Something no one AT ALL should read under any circumstance" And compared to other nazistic or fascist books,it was the most popular one,so it not being included was insanely strange and a big L by the Analyst
@@IAmGodHimself777 I think it wouldn't be wise for anyone to read about nazistic ideology and to hate every race but your own to the point where you're gonna gas them
@@IAmGodHimself777 (TH-cam auto deleted my comment so I'll have to say this way more simply) It promoted Austrian painter's ideology That is literally all I can say
I always felt that Slaughterhouse 5 touched in on PTSD and the detatchment and dissociation it causes; reliving horrific events and floating through time, in and out of a daze. The aliens seem like either an escape or a metaphor to explain the sensation to people who wouldn't understand otherwise.
Fun Fact: In India the high school final english exam book contains a extract from The Invisible Man book and the government takes the final exam so essentially every student has to learn this book Additional fun fact: The book is titled Footprints without feet because of the inclusion of this chapter
Bruh you mixed up the books. Footprints without feet is from the original invisble man written by H.G Wells. This 'banned' invisible man is written by a different author - Raph Ellison and it's contents are quite different. He even said the name of the author in the video lol.
The satanic verses sounds more like it was trying to speak against religious extremism by showing how religious texts could be subject to changes over time. I guess it makes sense why it was so criticized.
But why target Islam specifically? if the author wanted to show what you said then the bible would make much more sense. The Quran hasn't changed one bit since its writing 1500 years ago. That's one the biggest issue people have with Islam is that it is stagnant and outdated
@@xcell_r4thr87 ever read the quran it is the only book that satifies the desire for logic for all ages humans are born to be curious and distinguishing and islam provides th right way to direct thta desire and is most definitely the answer
No it's moreso just making fun of the religion itself because duh satanism, no clue where you got the idea that it has social commentary or anything actually productive to read about in its message.
I love how there's like three books that are obscene and improper, and then lile 10 more are basically "a realistic retelling of how and why the government lies to you" and the governments go around banning them left and right. Sounds like things one should absolutely read.
Brave New World is IMO one of the most important readings. It's also really entertaining. Honestly a pretty good story with a bit of on-the-nose social satire mixed in.
Fun fact: There is a song "Animal In Man" That is legit telling the story of "Animal Farm". Its basically just a reboot very of "Animal Farm" And the only reason I know this is because my dad listens to the person who made it music. The person who made the song is called "Dead Prez" btw. And even more crazy the Album from the song is called "Let's Get Free"
@@TheLivingThanos Archive of our Own. And amateur fiction site where it takes one misclick to get a page full of stories about vore or snuff, cannibalism or other vividly described body horror. They also explicitly allow UA fics.
I do happen to own 120 Days of Sodom which was passed down to me by my grandmother, and to be honest it has been sitting on my bookshelf for sometime because I refuse to read the novel too much, but when I did first read into the various chapters it made me think in unspeakable ways.
bro i actually found animal farm at my school lying on a shelf so i decided to read it, it is now one of my favourite books just the last line that was something like "the pig looked at the man then the man looked at the pig then the pig at the man again yet neither could tell the difference" overall just think it has a really deep meaning and displays it beautifily 10/10 definettly read it (sorry bout my spelling)
@@NEKOSAIKOU.No it’s not you goober. It’s a mockery but at the same time a fictional expository of the Quran and Muhammad written by Salman Rushdie. Honestly I’m tempted to read it cuz frankly I don’t care for Islam and certainly not it’s chomo prophet, might be fun.
I'm pretty sure the grown ups have interesting and far more accurate names for the ruling animals too. "No, not Napoleon, this one's Stalin. Call him Stalin. Snowball in exile? Are you idiots blind? That's Trotsky!"
lolita, brave new world and animal farm aren't banned, in my secondary school english class we read brave new world and animal farm and my friend has 2 copies of lolita and reads it regularly
Actually, I’m pretty sure in Brave New World that marriage isn’t a thing. Everyone belongs to everyone else, after all. And it’s not that they’re *forced* to do these things so much as it’s enforced and reinforced since childhood with things like hypnopedia. And the castes are also designated by intelligence, with Epsilsons being the lowest and Alphas being the highest. So you’re more *born* into a caste rather than forced into one. In fact, the only people that ever really *act out* against the system are Alphas, the most intelligent of the castes. But if they do act out, they’re not tortured or killed by the system, they’re simply sent to an island with like-minded people.
Fun fact, the carton was commissioned by the CIA to inspire people to overthrow communist governments. One of the British cartoon reviews mentioned something to the effect of it, and that is why the books ending is vastly different and more hopeless than the cartoon.
Fun fact about the anarchist cookbook there are recipes within that book that are specifically designed to eliminate idiots who try to make some of the recipes. Call it a perception check with Darwinism sprinkled in.
You really don’t know what the anarchist cookbook is. All of the weapons and bombs you can create there, are from official legal and public accessible text. The author just collected them to show how militarised the USA is and published it as protest against the Vietnamese war and a brutal society.
My class did animal farm for a history project it was a very cool and interesting book about what happened and how the system works in a more “friendly” way.
Animal Farm was critical of communist Russia in a time when the soviets were part of the allies. It could not be open in its criticism so it became a fable.
I once did a brief book report on the Anarchist Cookbook in college. There are 2 things about it that weren't mentioned in the video: 1. The recipes are allegedly unreliable and dangerous to perform, leading to some readers getting severely injured or killed when they tried the recipes. I don't remember who, but someone from the FBI said something along the lines if, "This book is especially bad because it is inaccurate. It's more likely to kill you than help you." They refused to give specifics, but that's probably because of the book being linked to multiple criminal investigations. (I'll also admit that I haven't verified these claims simply because I didn't want accurate pipe bomb recipes to show up in my search history.) 2.: The author of the Anarchist Cookbook later regretted writing the book and has lead multiple efforts to remove it from distribution. None of those efforts have been successful. The publishers now thoroughly own the rights and adamantly refuse to remove the book from store shelves, leading it to still be published and sold for a profit to this very day.
Yeah I remember reading somewhere that the anarchist cookbook was futile in regards to manufacturing explosives, because the individual was oblivious to bomb making, I also remember hearing that when I saw a documentary on the columbine shooting, Dylan and Eric had a copy of the book and they attempted to make propane bombs in duffel bags and they were timed to explode in the cafeteria when it was the most densely populated, but they were poorly made. Still, it's heart wrenching that happened.
Join us at - discord.com/invite/n8vHbE29tN
How is a clockwork orange not on this list!
Why do you keep lying in your titles?
you forgot mein kraft but that was probably for a good reason....
Hey dude, I dont know if you are aware of this, but there is a channel copying your videos and uploading them in spanish. This same video was uploaded 4 days after and its completely identical except for the translation. channel is called "Explicado en Paint".
You messed up “Lolita” it’s actually about a child SA victim’s idea of how the perpetrator thought. The child represents the author, & the main character is the abuser.
it's kinda crazy how nobody's talking about the banned books on site called lexnory
finnaly i listened myself about this and bought something online and I am satisfied
@@Sumtik_77 im also thinking of buying something there but im not sure yet
48 laws of power is a book everyone in a corporate job should read. Not so much so that you can take advantage of others, but so you can identify when others are taking advantage of you
It is a great book
@@sspectre8217 Maybe if you're Jewish
Npc book
@@gassanzadeGoated book fym
@@Rhianos nah, i need better ones
Nabokov was not writing Lolita as a person with “sick fantasies,” he wrote is as a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, getting into the mind of a perpetrator because he’d been on the receiving end, not because he wanted to do stuff to kids.
Yeah this guy had no idea what he was saying
So you're saying that he's Drake, damn
I'm sorry that's intersting to me but i couldn't find anything when i googled it do you have sources?
@@delaneybenlon6106 Bro, Nabokov literally have autobiography book. Need sources? Read it, don't seek anyone to tell you their truth and how they percieve thing and how you should too.
@@v.0190 Cool thanks, that wasn't one of the results i found when i googled the subject.
Lolita is… not at all a work of Nabokov’s fantasies. It’s a fucking inditement of everything in the book. He tried to destroy the manuscript several times because he was disgusted at the man he had written, but was reassured by his wife that it had to be published because it shed light on the types of people who commit these kinds of atrocities. The book has the consistent subtext that Humbert is a monster, only barely shrouded by the fact that Humbert is the narrator.
Lolita isn't supposed to be taken as glorifying the protagonist's obsession with Delores, it's supposed to be showing how much a terrible person will bend over backwards to justify his course of action. It's told from the point of view of an unreliable narrator.
It's viewed as an apologist book by the public. Don't even try to defend it in any way.
Vladimir Nabokov was very against ped0s. The whole point of this book was about how humbert was an unreliable narrator and how he neglected to share certain information to appear better than he actually is. He spent the whole time trying to manipulate the readers. If you actually had common sense you would realise this. Yes society segualised the book but that completely missed the point. Nabokov stretched the point that Dolores was just an innocent little girl taken victim by a horrible horrible man. Nabokov even wanted no girls to be present in the cover of Lolita he just wanted plain words or a landscape. This book was certainly not an apologist book.
@@human1834 the public opinion of the book disagrees with you, and that is what matters in this circumstance. All I see is you attempting to plant seeds. It's disgusting.
@@northernmetalworker Got long.. Seems like the average person have bad media literacy then.
Just because something makes the majority uncomfortable, that doesn't mean the majority is right.
We disabled people make the majority feel uncomfortable. Some want to lock us up (pathetic and cowardly).
Sometimes, the majority kind of deserve to feel uncomfortable. The more they ignore problems, the worse it will get.
While I haven't even read Lolita, I do know it's about how much some people justify their behavior.
I can't compare that topic with how people treat us disabled people, but a lot of people are willing to go really far to justify their internalizing attitudes towards us and never learn from their mistakes while we have to use all of our energy to go more than half the way when we want to meet in the middle.
Ignoring something really uncomfortable usually have serious consequences. I wish less people acted so cowardly and didn't hide behind peer pressure. It makes them looks so unreliable.. 😬
It reminds me of watching Arcane twice
Fun fact: When Animal farm was published and became popular both communist and western governments saw it as anti communist or anti capitalist, the reality is that its anti-authoritarian.
That just really speaks volumes 😢
It was literally banned in the eastern block. But nice try
@@DehydratedDarkness lime I said, both ideologies despise it.
@@Sam-I-Am981you said popular not unpopular in ur comment lmfao
@@elevatedmeance6807 Yikes.
1984 and Animal Farm getting banned sort of vindicates the entire fucking point of the novels
it's insane masterpiece
When I was in school, 1984 was REQUIRED reading.
The same thing about To Kill a Mockingbird. It was a requirement to read, but now it’s getting banned by some schools
lmao animal farm is a mandatory read here in most UK schools
@@phatcat3705i prefer Fahrenheit 451, I think it's got a better setup and also a more interesting premise.
but IMO all three should be read.
There's a book called Success Secrets Of The Elite, it talks about how using some secret techniques you can attract a lot of money, it's not some bullshit, it's the real deal. Great video btw
L promo
@@bryanuriostegui8339 Not a promotion just saying what the book those
@@bryanuriostegui8339hard. What is it about these “No bullshit books” posts everywhere atm? And how many people are buying these books..?
L promo lol get cooked bot
@@markerman206 Not a bot
"Oh sh* he interpreted Lolita completely wrong. Let's see the comment sec- yeah. They def told him."
Bet you he did it on purpose to increase engagement.
From the pov of the algorithm, every comment is a good comment.
He even made me comment. I've been bamboozled
@@KirosanaPerkele someone has to write a book on how to evade the algorithm and be able to recognise social bubbles you are getting dragged into on the internet.
@KirosanaPerkele People heavily overrate the importance of engagement. It's far better to build a good reputation because that way it's much easier for you to monetize your audience.
@@Timmy-mi2ef but also you can't have any reputation or sponsorship without engagement
@@Timmy-mi2ef Be that as it may, this guy isn't doing what you say.
He has another video about drugs and comments are full of people explaining how he got everything wrong
do every film banned
Let's see first if many people will be interested in this video or perhaps many likes in your comment? :)
@@actuallyjunzi yesssss
Good idea
good think
@@TheAnalystYTs i would
I think the Anarchist's Cookbook is kinda cameoed in Fallout, where it's subsequently and kinda ironically renamed the _Patriot's Cookbook_ by the Pre-war government.
Finding it ingame and reading it will give you temporary +10 to Explosives💀
I thought of the same thing! That reference is wild for them to make.
Based pre-war goverment.
XD im ngl. I have read it cause you can find a scanned version online in library archives and i feel like it should've given you more then just a boost in explosives lol
Ever played The Binding Of Isaac? It's a really common item there... But also, the game covers all satanic/holy disturbing books, pills, etc... so no wonder.
@@blackxrosary how did u read it?
I don't see that German Minecraft book.
😂
LMAO
The struggle is real
People keep saying "We want bad guy as main character" and Lolita author got called pedo for the main antagonist of his work lmao .
😢
Exactly lol
Except that good and bad are human creations, inexistant within reality.
@@H.A.Kingdom i imagine we all know that. It has not much to do with the original comment though
@@H.A.Kingdom You wouldn't sound smarter if you spoke proper English.
“How The Publishing Industry Failed ‘Lolita’” is a video everyone here needs to watch. It’s honestly disgusting how massacred the books reputation is
Yes! That is one of my favorite videos here on TH-cam. It encapsulates how poorly publishers treated Lolita and later sensationalized it.
I mean, no one wants to read a book about a pedo grooming a child, that’s fucking weird. So it makes sense why no one wanted it around.
Great video, but your interpretation of Lolita is wrong, it’s a coming misconception that the author is just a creep and it’s supposed to be some taboo love story, really it’s intended to be a psychological thriller by brining you into the delusional world of a child predator
I read the book and people forget that the author wrote the novel in part to cope with his sexual abuse when he was a child.
@@DaftnPunkyou got a source on him making it to cope? Can't find anything on it.
@@fredthefish581I read that too.
@@janavukcevic Read the book? How does that answer my question?
Humbert was a doofus and the butt of the joke. It was no love story.
Tell me you haven't read half of these books without telling me you haven't read half of these books.
Clearly an AI script tbh
He got so much incorrect/misinformed in his documentaries list too.
This is making me wonder if he's using cunningham's law to learn more about these books by giving out wrong information in hopes that people in the comments will correct him and tell him the right information.
How should he they are banned 😂
No one cares that you read.
Everyone here is telling the actual story of Lolita,while I’ll just add that as a Russian,i find it funny that in Russia like…literally EVERYONE knew what Lolita is about.This book just falls to the type of the book that was so revolutionary that it got her a bad reputation.Even the japanese word for Loli basically comes from it
I didn't even know Loli came from lolita, I always thought it was a shortened version of a japanese word
@@mirkoruhl9324 Ignorance.
@@mirkoruhl9324ignorance.
@@jokesflyovermyhead7491 Valid ignorance
In czechia we learn about it in school
im getting very subtle VERY VERY subtle hints that this was written with chatgpt
I feel like most of these videos are
It's the constant similes
@@roomba1745He does it pretty much every video
The entire "Grapes of Wrath" section felt completely AI generated. Just several minutes of puns without really saying anything.
What? Chatgpt? Never.
Fun fact. Animal farm was banned in USA for being "pro communist" and in soviet union as for being "pro capitalist".
Edit: sorry I mistook it for another Orwell's anti utopian book called 1984. It is similar to animal farm, but it is longer and I would say more dystopian (both of them are great and deserve attention tho)
My whole class read it in high school
Animal farm portraits communism very good. Every communist leader in history acted like he would change society in a positive way and get rid of the class based system, but in reality, it was always just another dictator, inventing a new class system based on loyalty and ideology.
Justice always has been subjective within communist states, depending on the leading figures mind, which also makes the idea of this ideology a sole hoax.
Unfortunately, especially looking at some stereotypical students nowadays, humanity doesn't seem to be keen on learning regarding this topic.
Animal Farm being banned in the US for being pro-Communist makes no sense. Can we get a source on that?
@@ianmartinesq remember why the animals revolt in the first place. They're rebelling against a capitalist/imperialist hellscape but inadvertently create a communist/imperialist hellscape in opposition to such.
@@ianmartinesq The kind of people who want to curtail expression in democratic societies tend to have difficulty recognizing satire, parody, subtext, or context. As true back then as it is today, I'm afraid.
I saw someone else comment that they felt this video was written (at least in part) by AI, and I can't help agreeing. Having read many of these books, the summaries given are superficial and surface-level at best and simply incorrect at worst. A lot of these incorrect assertions make it obvious this creator hasn't actually read the books in question, and the way it dodges the nuance and context behind something like Lolita in favor of what would definitely be an AI-generated interpretation has me thinking there's no other explanation.
A lot of people mentioned Lolita but I want to talk about Slaughterhouse Five, which was touted as time travel novel + Dresden = make love not war. There is no time travel in this novel, Billy Pilgrim is experiencing the perspective that the fourth dimension offers, in which, like the tralfamadorians who abduct him, he perceives the past, present, and future simultaneously, and his life events are told out of order to reflect this. Of course, the book is anti-war in nature, and someone who actually researched the novel would probably mention in a video like this that Vonnegut was himself at Dresden, and this novel is more potently anti-war because of it. Calling it a 'hippie manifesto' is outrageous, and I also appreciate how aliens are mentioned simply as "this book has aliens" while saying nothing about the nature of the tralfamadorians or Billy's time as a zoo exhibit (again, a video essay like this would definitely have at least mentioned it). Just my two cents, this video is either definitely AI and/or the creator is an extremely lazy researcher...also, the title of this video is literally clickbait, this was like 10 banned books and not 'Every'.
Haven't read slaughterhouse-five.
But from your comment I gotta admire how smart it is to explain experiencing different time periods as "fourth dimension effect".
I went to Google and the book was published a couple decades after special relativity so this science fiction uses actual physics convictions (the universe being 3+1 dimensions and time being the +1).
A little irrelevant, but I admire this detail.
Nerd.
The fact that Marquis de 'Sade' is the originator of the word 'Sadism' was missed. 120 days of Sodom is so scandalous, it gave rise to a new fetish.
Bro like yeah imagine writing something so grotesque people assosciate your name for the common fetish
Sade and Gustav Von Masoch are two sides of a kinky coin.
New?
@@jamesholland8057 which is why i said common fetish. We can be sure that it was common back then, but wasn't mainstream because there was no internet back then.
@@nitsu2947 I was speaking of newness of sadism as an act as not be nee, but as old as humans on planet earth.
Suprised that fahrenheit 451 isn't on here. It's probably the most ironic one banned.
A book about banning books to the point of incinerating them, getting banned is high level meta 💀
Its not a banned book
Its not banned tho
It’s possible the book is banned wherever they’re from since book bans vary from place to place
@@fatherlessflavid some places and schools have banned the book.
Nabakov wrote Lolita to push the boundaries of telling a good story from the point of view of a deplorable villain. Nabakov wasn’t like that in life
Kubrick's version is underrated.
Nabokov was a victim himself, its almost ignorant to interpret his work that way
If you wrote a book about enjoying killing Jews you probly low-key have a thing against jews
Also, i heard that if nabokov had a daughter, lolita would be a boy because he just couldn't write about molesting a girl.
Uh, sorry for my english. And i don't know about the source, -trust me bro-
I think he was showing the motivation of nasty persons in this world.
Nobody talking about the fact that "Brave New World" got banned by politicians is a bad omen for us all.
I studied animal farm in school, the main character Napoelon was literally a metaphor for Stalin
It's more directly referencing the Spanish civil war with how the Marxist revolutionaries became just as bad as Franco's government
Orwell even says in the preface it was based on his experiences participating in the conflict
Look at you two bickering over the themes as if you learned something
@@mrnukes797oh wise one pls share your great knowledge with us
Idk man thinking they're better cause they're pigs sounds pretty herrenrasse to me
@@lordgod9958dude you dont even know what the spanish civil war was about xD
Franco was the one doing a coup detat and the legitimate government was the one closer to marxism
he did an absolute disservice to slaughterhouse five in this vid, Vonnegut is telling us a story about his experiences through a fictional character, Billy Pilgrim. the sci-fi elements and the aliens is from billy’s mind being the only way he can process the trauma. dresden was a fire bombing, so bad that people were being boiled alive in the river and when they opened the one bomb shelter (dresden was thought to be safe because of its hospitals, POW and civilian population, they were pretty withdrawn from the war if i remember correctly) it was “a green and brown sludge”, they melted in the shelter because of the heat. he only survived from being in a slaughterhouse which at that time was tens of feet deep underground. Slaughterhouse Five is not a hippie anti war book, but a tragedy that was being covered up by the USA military.
Well said. Thanks for letting us know.
Among many tragedies since.
It’s also a horrible read. If you don’t know that his PTSD is what’s causing the time traveling from the beginning it’s a huge headache to try and wrap your head around, and he can’t go a single chapter without inserting himself into a random scene or going off on some tangent about homosexuality. If you want a “war is bad” story do yourself a favor and just watch saving private ryan.
I gad no idea, thank you for sharing this information.
Watching this as someone from a country that doesn't ban books, it seems dystopian to ban books in its own right.
Most of these books seem to be banned due to criticism of the government, which is quite absurd for a country that calls itself "Land of the free".
Free to read state approved literature, I guess..
Lolita’s point being missed completely because people didn’t realise it’s written in with an unreliable narrator in mind. Which I mean, fair. When you read a book you usually expect it to be from a third person perspective. But since it’s like with Humbert in mind, it’s supposed to highlight how said character would twist his mind to justify his love
People forgot how to think and the reason is mass control
For a youtube channel called "the analyst" you clearly have no idea what these books were about or why they were really banned. It sounds like you just read from the wiki entries for all of these
then please iluminate me
For a TH-cam commentator named Applecore, I see no evidence your an Applecore. Sad....
fr!
@@hibosmodude you have literally been flamed in these other comments for your misinterpretation of Lolita as well as your absurd sub par understanding of slaughterhouse five. Go look at the other comments with hundreds of likes explaining why this video sucks lmao. Maybe put a little more effort into the script next time
@@applecore7000the guy you replied to isnt the youtuber
"Everyone is free some are just more free than others" Orwell is such a mad lad
Pinnacle quote from a genius giving warnings to world citizens.
Working in British-ruled India will do that to you
⁶üƙüüüüü😊@@stereo-soulsoundsystem5070
I had to read the book in year 9, still own it now. It's a fascinating read, tbh
Still creeps me out constantly, especially when it comes to what happens to Boxer (I think that was the horse's name)
@@stereo-soulsoundsystem5070 seeing what communism does first hand will do thay you as well.He fought with the amarchists in the spanish civil war.
120 Days of Sodom actually got a movie adaptation. The movie is considered the sickest of all time by critics, and the director was murdered by the mafia 3 weeks before the movie released, where he was planning to negotiate to some thieves that stole film rolls of the movie. The mafia then pinned the murder on a guy driving the director's car, and it wasnt until 2005 that the guy admitted the mafia told him to confess.
What’s the name of the movie
Ironically, the actors playing the Teenagers apparently had a great time from some reports I've heard.
@@Jaxksworld Uhh… 120 Days of Sodom? But the full name is “Salò or the 120 Days of Sodom”
@@GigiBranconi Yeah. I heard the scene where the prisoners had to eat poop was apparently chocolate
hi, just to add something: the truth behind Pasolini's murder is still unknown. While a lot of people and theories agree on the framed guy not being the actual murderer, we still can't be sure on what really happened behind the scenes. Pasolini was, in that period, one of the most influencial intellectuals in Italy and had a lot of enemies both in the governament and in the biggest companies. 70' and 80' where difficult years in italian politics and what really happened behind the scenes is still unclear and being debated. This just to say that mafia could be implied in the murder but we aren't sure if they were only the material murderers and someone ordered them to do it.
(Sorry for my english, i'm italian and it's not my first language)
Animal farm is part of the Australian school curriculum, so weird to hear it's banned
It's part of the US's too
I guess this video references the time when it was banned during the war. The parallels to Stalin and his paranoia and unlawful rule were pretty obvious, so the allies banned it during the war to not rock the boat
Not banned in Russia either
Yeah it's not banned anywhere I bet, it's just there to either fill up the video or to get people commenting that it's not banned
Almost all of these books are not banned at all.
fun fact! 120 days of sodom has a movie! i watched it with my cousin and we stopped at the end because the end was so afwul. its way worse then he explained its truly afwul especially the torture at the end
Lolita is not a love story or a reflection of Nabokov's fetish, despite what popular culture will tell you. It is and was always meant to be a tragedy, something that both Nabokov and his wife stated on multiple occasions. Nabokov reportedly considered a scene where Humbert "realizes, with a shock, that amid the “musical vibration” that lifts from a valley below him, [Lolita's] voice is plangently missing from the melody of children at play" to be one of his favorites and one of the novel's most important passages. "That absence impresses on him the gravity of his crime, the past that he has failed to retrieve, the future that he has interrupted." (Stacy Schiff, "Véra Nabokov Was the First and Greatest Champion of 'Lolita'"). Nabokov's wife Véra commented that many reviewers failed to see past the nymphet persona Humbert has imposed over Dolores, missing her “complete loneliness in the whole world” and “the tender description of the child’s helplessness, her pathetic dependence on monstrous Humbert Humbert, and her heartrending courage all along.” "She cries every night," Véra wrote, "and the critics are deaf to her sobs.” The tragedy and monstrosity of the situation is the point of the novel, not "how [Nabokov] is dying to experience some sick pleasures" as you stated in the video.
I think that Nabokov inadvertently stumbled on this horrific fact that most people are subtle pe**s, quick to stone anyone who gets caught (or talks about it) in order to disguise themselves. That would explain the persistence of pe**a, its emergence in certain historical settings, at certain times, or at certain locations, throughout all kinds of social classes, and even among sacred/religious people (go figure). It would explain the secret societies, child trafficking, the wrong recension of the book in this video (likely AI generated), and this guy Ludwig August Robert Rasch marrying a 15 yo while pretending to be German administrator of Nauru, a small Pacific island, in the 19th century.
If critics are deaf to her sobs, it’s because HH never shuts the fuck up about himself long enough to hear over the sound of his own voice. While i can grasp the literary elements of this story, it became a tedious read bc the reader spends time ad nauseum with HH & his inner snobbish thoughts throughout the entirety of the book (imagine that, a story with a pedophiliac protagonist and my biggest complaint is that he is a dreadful bore!) *Of course, with Percival Everett giving a voice to Jim in his book James, it’s probably only a matter of time before anyone gives a voice to Lolita in his/her as-yet-to-be-written book Dolores*
Now i know the counterpoint will be that Lolita is a 1st Person Narrative so obviously the protagonist will be the only perspective within the book; however, i think of the 1st person narrative of Huckleberry Finn… and, how often he disappears within his own story. That’s brilliant! And something that Nabokov never really mastered in his book.
No, once you push pass the sensationalism of the pedophilia, the story emerges. And, it’s a shame that Nabokov culminated his characters into sexual deviance when that aspect was wholly unnecessary; better if he had HH traversing the United States while repressing a sexual desire for this young girl; we the readers would be having a largely more interesting discussion about this book if Nabokov had painted allusions of HH’s passion for Lolita rather than outright forcing them into sexual trysts. Rather, the story is about a foreigner’s bewildering, detestable attraction to The States which he can’t explain to himself, and the best way to exemplify this confusion is through the experiences of a teenage American girl; when HH doesn’t understand Dolores’ obsessions with comics and celebrity magazines and plasticky sundaes and cornball movies, it’s truly an insight into Nabokov’s foreign viewpoint on America; she’s the younger virginal America, he is the older outdated Europe. He wants to mold her into being a European with tennis lessons, she excels at the sport but could care less about it at the same time. What gives the story away for me is when HH is talking about how the mountains in America don’t compare to the mountains of Europe, but how he has no desire to return to those European mountains again. His failing is that he never quite realizes that the love within him is bastardized.
You're also wrong about invisible man- it is banned to this day in school libraries, but not because of racial politics, but because it contains scenes of rape and incest that parents have felt school children aren't mature enough to handle
I did not know HG Wells went that far in his books of societal criticisms.
@@jamesholland8057 not Wells tho
@@jamesholland8057wrong book
wrong. mr. white didn't like the language mr. black was using. the whole book is about race.
I read it and grapes of wrath in high school 2 years ago and both were assigned so I don’t think it’s still banned and if it is well then I have some people I need to talk to
One thing about Slaughterhouse-Five: it was by no means a “sneaky” attempt at an anti-war novel, it was BLATANTLY an anti-war novel. Like Kurt Vonnegut wrote it using his witnessing of the bombing of Dresden as a base. (also, the main character travels through different points in his own life, randomly, not just from one time period to the next)
Unstuck in time and totally anti war. The rest of his life he said so.
"Only on Earth is there any mention of free will."
I didn't read it but my friend did and he didn't really have a clue what happened
@@kdog2646 Probably because it was told out of order, while reading it I had a summary that was written chronologically.
Lolita isn't supposed to justify or romanticize pedophilia, it's supposed to show how twisted bad people are and how much they'll try to justify their actions. It also shows how hard it is to tell good from bad for the most part.
Anarchist cookbook is funny to me, half the recipes are wrong or don't really work and the army already has their own improvised munitions handbook that's much more accurate.
It really is the "rebellious teen" book.
i printed one off the internet in high school and yeah its not that great at what it tries to do 😂 i learned more first aid than anarchy
@@hgriff14 for real. A high school chem class will teach you more than the book.
Imagine the government makes a sort fake one of theses that are full with with wrong recipes
You can learn more about explosives from first year chemistry than this.
I'm convinced the purpose of the book was to be a "false flag" or bait of sorts. I don't think it was made by real anarchists who intended to arm people with radical tactics, i think it was written by the feds to see who picked up the book knowing they can track down and trace the spread of it and its full of stuff thats either useless or outright dangerous to the reader moreso than any authority or state. I'm no field expert by amy means but It's just too laughably bad to be serious to me, many other commenters have already mention the vietnam era edition of the improvised munitions handbook being leagues superior, and it's also never been banned or particularly hard to access, any military man would have it and be able to give it to someone and now it's on pdf right now for free. The AC even reads like what some edgy loser 20 something would say to impress some naive teens who aren't old enough to tell how cringey he is yet. Maybe it is real idk, i mean anarchists are known for stereotypically being like that but I really wouldn't be surprised if it was made by feds to be bait either. Much furor over such a useless book makes me question it.
Its so fascinating to hear that animal farm if banned in certain countries whilst where I’m from it’s a required book for the schools curriculum
Aussie?
@@jujuoverella10I’m from Ohio and I had to read it sophomore year
Nebraskan here. I read it just last school year.
Basically related to your country’s/province’s views of socialism. Socialists tend to dislike Animal Farm since it tells the truth about socialism.
@@woo1818 me when I lie
The point of Lolita was to show the awful machinations and narcisism of a child predator who believes what they're doing is right.
It also shows how moronic average people are who assume its an edgy love story and not a book about the horrible world view of Humbert.
I truly beleive people who cannot understand that Humbert is supposed to be the villain and an unreliable source are delusional and deserve the the same scruitiny as people who see it as a love story. This book should be used as a lesson in litterary comprehension.
I'm guessing the problems may also partially stem from idiots who try to make a film and now they want everything associated to be banned, regardless.
@@gabrielho1874 Agreed. I think banning and censorship of art/litterature only empowers the ideas you fear. We should be studying and breaking down the ideas of these works to scrutinize it properly as a collective. See why the ideas disgust us and how to avoid or unstand how to deal with these issues.
This is evident enough with this book being banned and censored to appeal to people about a subject that was never meant to be appealing. People who see Lolita as anything but the delusions of an egotistical predator to romanticize his sick actions are the same as Humbert when it comes to perceptions of the girl. Showing the mental gymnastics the reader has to soften the cruelty of the protagonist so they don't feel bad about reasing the book. "Humbert was so lovey dovey, it's like a Romio Juliet scenario where Juliet is just stuck up". Sickening mindest to ponder people having.
@@anglosaxiphone8246 apparently the film fumbled exploring the theme as perspectives isn't easy to do on film as with books. The child actress also does not want anything to do with the film which is understandable.
@@gabrielho1874 Wow that is messed up. Imagine doing a movie on the Holocaust and having the crowd mistake it for a summer camp movie midway.
Thankfully someone said it. Totally agree
One of the major concerns of "The Anarchist Cookbook" some of the recipes could get you killed
Good.
In South Korea, illustrated simplified versions of Animal Farm are a standard part of many children's classics book sets. With Kim up North, society probably want their youth to see the problems with leaders like that early.
What about Brave New World? Is it a part of school curriculum in south Korea?
@d-syndie Not sure. I only know about the Animal Farm because I've seen copies (and used to have one).
You can’t seriously believe that is the only evil in that peninsula. There are a few major families in South Korea that control the entire country, like Samsung.
We read Animal Farm as part of the curriculum in South Africa, crazy to think it would be banned in a whole country while it's literally for highschool children in another
Yeah, I read it too in high school.
I read it for higher English in Scotland
It's such a good book. Good lessons in it, everyone should read it.
If you tell them they're free while controlling what they even read......
Read it in Germany too
I clicked on this for a single book to hear what he said about it, and he gets the themes and intention completely wrong and twists it (Lolita). Dang.
Edit: This is the only video of this channel I’ve watched, but the poor accuracy of these book descriptions combined with the channel’s super frequent upload schedule leads me to believe scripts are written with AI.
I was curious about the lolita
He twisted all 3 books i know soo…
I think he made the script with AI since at least some parts sounds like what AI has given me for a few books, so the AI could just be hallucinating things about the books and getting it wrong
he glosses over major details of other books too, like how the protagonist of slaughterhouse 5 is “time traveling” because of his ptsd. calling it a hopscotch through time is a bit of an oversimplification
0:03 remember, the anarchist cookbook is littered with faulty recipes.
Instead, use the Improvised Munitions Handbook from the Army
The Anarchist Cookbook 0:00
The Satanic Verses 1:13
120 Days of Sodom 3:01
Lady Chatterley’s Lover 4:05
48 Laws of Power 5:28
Lolita 6:51
Brave New World 8:25
Animal Farm 9:56
The Grapes of Wrath 11:17
Slaughterhouse 5 12:30
Invisible Man 13:51
Thx man ❤
@@Isaac_Grace yw
You're the man
@@kaandemirkiran4583 you’re welcome
brave new world is a great read tho
If the prison are worried about “48 laws” will turn inmates into “master manipulators” and prison into game of thrones then someone might have to break the news that they’re a little late lol.
On the next episode of reality the inmates will recreate the feeling of courtroom dramas inspired by sensationalist media *FIND OUT WHO'S INNOCENT AND WHO'S GUILTY!!!*
My inspiration for this comment came from the gta Iv radio stations , as mentioned, oversaturated early 2000s "reality" TV shows such as jerry, maury, steve wilkos, and paternity court.
@@mrnukes797 I’d watch
48 Laws of Power isn't even correct or well written for a large percentage of the laws. It's really obvious when someone tries to weaponize most of them because they're wrong or incomplete.
Good one.
I am pretty sure that Nabokov wasn't a p#do, but Humbert humbert sure was. The author on his own wanted to show how men he knew behave in front of young girls, I am not sure but I do not want people to spread misinformation about nabokov writin' the book to please himself!
He wrote lolita due to the trauma of his father being killed turing a terrorist attck by sergei taboritsky who later joined the SS and founded the russian SS youth.
@@healyice No, not Taboritsky! Not him again!
@@pelinalwhitestrake3367 Holy shit! Is that a TNO refrence?!
@@healyice I thought it was cause he was a sexual abuse victim himself? Unless both things are true which is so so soo horrible
I heard he was abused himself and when he saw an abducted young girl being portrayed as the villain who ruined a man's life he decided to write the book.
It was never meant to be a love story or to sexualise children.
There were so many angles to take on Lolita, but taking the easy one like this shuts people down.
The author wrote this book about how twisted these child predators get in their thinking to justify the wrong things they do. Remember that everyone thinks they are “the good guy”, especially if they are doing something wrong.
With how badly you got lolita wrong i wouldnt trust another video this man does
But everyone makes mistakes though, don't they?
@@Lua_You And yet this video is still up, with the mistakes that everyone and their grandmum pointed out, because the channel clearly doesn't give a fuck.
Im pretty sure he uses chatgpt
@@latestmush9281 idk probably but hope not
I agree. It sounds like an interpretation of someone who never read a single line of this book and only watched the movie(s)
"48 Laws of Power" kind of reminds me of "The Prince" by Machiavelli. It was a book written for royal princes to teach them how to rule their kingdom and manipulate their populace to ensure compliance even through less than ethical means. I read somewhere that it was very secretly written as a warning for the common folk as well since Machiavelli had some outstanding grievances with the crown and also that the book was mass produced in the common vernacular of Italy... that everyone could read.
i remember the machiavelli name i think i took a test abt him i scored like a 98 or smthn
When was that book written, anyhow? It's the only book on this list I've never heard of before.
Machiavelli is referenced hundreds of times in the laws of power
@@darreljones86451500s
I do reccomend it, good book. People see it as immoral, I think ots best understood as amoral. This is how the world works, not how it should.
Told someone I was reading Animal Farm when he said he’d read the book I gave him (Diary of a young girl). He told me I was too old to read kids books. I literally can’t with this man 💀
I made the same mistake when I was a bored eight year old and picked up the big book with the animal on the cover
That probably had a lot of effect on my personality growing up
@@B.E.N_ did it affect you in a good way?
@@CornflowerBlue10 Probably? I mean it did give me a lot of insight on things like how propaganda can look like and how totalitarian regimes can end up happening, didn't fully comprehend everything at that age but I did learn stuff
However it also probably made me a little more cynical and a bit paranoid which isn't always good
Animal Farm is a great and educational read but I think I could've waited a bit until I had the proper context
@@B.E.N_ probably would've been best if you read it at like 12-14 years old
@@CornflowerBlue10 I agree, still glad I read it though.
4:32 Bonnie and Joe Swanson.
😂
0:26
I don’t need no cook book, I already have a meme that tells me how to make a pipebomb
Anyone wants to create the sub r/AnarchistCookbook where we remake the book in memes format? I've got a meme telling how to make chloroform...
@@G2000_the_viewer rookie shit
Pipebomb, meth, Multiple nuclear reactor tutorials, a few home made guns, and military documents
(All of these except for the reactor prob are fake and as a joke)
Someone needs to mention how about 75% of the recipes in that book aren't even practical or in some cases at all possible. It's not any more dangerous to some authority than google is
@@ChiIlNoob I got one for particle accelerators, crack, Demon cores, amphetamines and Molotov's
@@afz902k I'm surprised to see something like this buried in the replies. The Anarchist Cookbook gets so much stuff wrong it's not even funny.
So funny little thing about Lady Chatterley's Lover is there was a rumour that could have been distorted over the generations. Lawrence was born in my hometown of Eastwood, and when you hear stories from older people who got stories from their grandparents, it was often said that D.H. Lawrence was a very sour man who caused people to actively avoid him as soon as they saw him. One thing they were notably afraid of was being slandered in his works, and it was believed that the Lady Chatterley was in fact a real person of high-standing who was the subject of such slander. A conference hall and hotel in town is said to be where the estate in the story took place, and there's a pub in the middle of town called the Lady Chatterley.
That is actually super interesting
Lady Chatterley enrages me. Damn cheating bastard
So like Taylor Swift
3:01 Fun fact: The director of the movie version of this book was murdered.
Animal farm is so much more. It mimics history, with each character representing a different part of the soviet revolution for example, the Farmers next door represent the Austrian painter who invades russia or the dogs that kill protestors representing the KGB/secret police. The book ends with the pigs and humans playing cards round a table and the pigs becoming bipedal. It's about how absolute power corrupts absolutely. All the animals have short life spans and only a few remember what life was even like before the revolution
It's disturbing how many people think someone is a horrible person just because one of the characters in a book is a creep or something..
It's like saying "if you can think of something creepy and disturbing, you're a creep." That would be almost everyone by default.
What kind of logic are people even using??
The "AH-HA! I'm a better person than you are!" logic.
making a book CENTERED around a pedo is pretty weird dawg
@prodigalpriest yeah that. People who want to feel better about themselves
This also effects other media, movies and games included.
You will never see an American playing the villain, potentially because of hollywood propoganda. But also because they experiance harrasment.
Thats why you often get foriengers in that positions.
This forms an unhealthy view of other countries.
An example of this is the video game "Red Dead Redemption 2" of which is considered masterpiece of fiction specifically for the main cast mainly the player character, Arthur.
Now this is a sequal game, and he and other members dont appear again. So they have to be offd in one way or the other. Now our villain (the one who was harrased). Michah bell, is as described by many "a bottom feeding rat" who while unlikeable throughout the 1st half. Gaines a foothold to manipulate many cat members. Leading to a emotionally draining betrayel.
The actor was harrassed and sent death threats because of his amazing performance.
Fr though
10:50 Actually Animal farm doesn’t just poke fun at power hungry leaders it’s been crafted specifically to poke fun of Russian/Soviet politics as it was aimed at the USSR
And not banned in Russia, read it in uni as part of the curriculum
@@eggchant Hah! talk about historical irony there
Ive heard i more 'right leaning' areas of America they are banned, with many people who want it banned not even reading it. Often because the instigater of the ban uses the magic words of "socilist, anti-captilist/american, or hereasy"
Yeah it honestly strikes me as someone who has never read the book. The parrallels couldn't be clearer
Its basically a recreation of the events that happened during the early 20th century Russia but with animals
120 Days seems light compared to some of the communities that are on Twitter and reddit
Believe me its not light
Just checked it and saw a part about sh!t fetish
Why so?
@@eclat4641
Damn comment went down apparently
I don't recommend even checking the book tho its unworth it
Things are a lot more depraved then 120 days.
Watch the movie buddy
0:32 so where can i find this book
Internet archive
@@thatonehumanirken2006 thx
Dark web
Every where
I hope bro is joking
0:01 The Binding of Isaac players:i got the reference
Lmao, as an isaac player, i saw that and was immediately like, "BINDING OF ISAAC REFERENCE!!"
What’s the reference
@@SlapdashoThere's an item in the game called "the anarchist cookbook" which sumons bombs
@@elenjanineprado nice
Yessssss
So half of these are banned because they were disgusting or dangerous, and the other half are banned because they were too honest?
Wow.
Don't forget: some were 'morally wrong' and 'too informational' for the society to continue being controled.
Well, some informations are just dangerous. Nobody wants their weird neighbour to learn how to create bombs from everyday items
@@ayouxy What a waste of time, even if the internet didn't just tell you when you want to know. The information to make a bomb becomes obvious when you see the instructions for how to not accidentally blow yourself up when handling certain materials.
@@ayouxy did the original comment meant something fycking different
@@H.A.Kingdom morality is social control
The anarchist cookbook is a plant btw. A lot of the recipes are described in a way that blow up instantly. Also it’s basically just used as a way to quadruple any sentence you have. If the feds raid ur home and find it, it will be used against you. I recommend the improvised munitions handbook in stead
I heard you also get instantly put on a watch list when googling it.
Fuckin feds, good thing I have the cognitive ability to make my own stuff (for legal reasons this is a joke)
You recommend a book on how to make bombs?
@@roomba1745Yes.
@@roomba1745are you really asking this in a comment section of a video about banned literature?
"Every book worth banning is a book worth reading".
This feels AI generated
exactly what i was thinking, theres noticable patterns in the script such as the use of similies in almost every description.. 💀
Catching on.
this channel's training data not varied enough
You know that the tempo of the voice varies and transitions smoothly not abruptly. So it’s likely a regular person
@@r-labs9357 i may refer to noy the voice, the script
48 powers of law is my favorite book of all time
i don’t think it makes u manipulate ppl
it just makes u see life from a different perspective and it teaches you how to “finesse” life basically
or finesse someone who’s tryna finesse u😉
in a world full of people just manipulating each other it teaches you very useful life skills.
@@jonahrice6762 basically
Yeah so cheat basically? I guess forget dignity & integrity then, geez..
@@LightningDoesStrikeThrice 🫥
@@LightningDoesStrikeThrice delete this dumb ahh comment bro💀
0:52 what a mischievous action
How silly
3:04 Diddy’s favorite read.
Why does "brave new world" Remind me of the plot of "we happy few"
We happy few is probably inspired by it
It's like another book called "The Giver"
Same! I immediately thought of it
It is inspired by Aldus Huxley's book, however, the story of Brave New World tells the experience of a man taken from a human zoo that experiences the dystopian life after his release
More like books you must read before you die.
Lolita?
@@keeferChiefer maybe
One book I really expected to see is Mein Kamph "My struggle" by Adolf Hitler, volume 1 and, or volume 2 too, and one book that isn't banned, but is just as controversial and similar to some of the books, (covering controversial and dislike topics), is American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World by David E. Stannard, I'm really not sure if you already made videos on these 2 books because I haven't really looked at your channel, but I doubt that because from what I can tell, you made videos about a group of things that are similar under one topic, thank you, bye.
It was absolutely crazy that it didn't get mentioned AT ALL
Most of these books can kind of teach you something important about life or just be a psychological horror
Or are actually bad for people but not THAT bad
Making them highly controversial at worst
On the other hand
Mein Kampf was agreed by many people to be just "Something no one AT ALL should read under any circumstance"
And compared to other nazistic or fascist books,it was the most popular one,so it not being included was insanely strange and a big L by the Analyst
@@VERGIL...-Why is it agreed upon that no one under any circumstances should read Mein Kampf?
@@IAmGodHimself777
I think it wouldn't be wise for anyone to read about nazistic ideology and to hate every race but your own to the point where you're gonna gas them
@@IAmGodHimself777 (TH-cam auto deleted my comment so I'll have to say this way more simply)
It promoted Austrian painter's ideology
That is literally all I can say
@@VERGIL...- funny moustache man did not have any good ideologies
I always felt that Slaughterhouse 5 touched in on PTSD and the detatchment and dissociation it causes; reliving horrific events and floating through time, in and out of a daze. The aliens seem like either an escape or a metaphor to explain the sensation to people who wouldn't understand otherwise.
This video makes me wanta start a forbidden book collection.
Same!,cher.
Start with Mein Kempf
@@notingh3re dude... 💀
@@notingh3reoh.💀
@@OMNISSIAH-VERY-GREATbut hes right...
Fun Fact: In India the high school final english exam book contains a extract from The Invisible Man book and the government takes the final exam so essentially every student has to learn this book
Additional fun fact: The book is titled Footprints without feet because of the inclusion of this chapter
Crazy ikr?
Bruh you mixed up the books. Footprints without feet is from the original invisble man written by H.G Wells. This 'banned' invisible man is written by a different author - Raph Ellison and it's contents are quite different. He even said the name of the author in the video lol.
The satanic verses sounds more like it was trying to speak against religious extremism by showing how religious texts could be subject to changes over time. I guess it makes sense why it was so criticized.
I think the TH-camr got the story slightly wrong.
But why target Islam specifically? if the author wanted to show what you said then the bible would make much more sense. The Quran hasn't changed one bit since its writing 1500 years ago. That's one the biggest issue people have with Islam is that it is stagnant and outdated
@@xcell_r4thr87 ever read the quran it is the only book that satifies the desire for logic for all ages humans are born to be curious and distinguishing and islam provides th right way to direct thta desire and is most definitely the answer
Your seeing intentions in places that aren't there, hes just an asshole who wanted to make fun of islam, it's not that deep
No it's moreso just making fun of the religion itself because duh satanism, no clue where you got the idea that it has social commentary or anything actually productive to read about in its message.
I love how there's like three books that are obscene and improper, and then lile 10 more are basically "a realistic retelling of how and why the government lies to you" and the governments go around banning them left and right. Sounds like things one should absolutely read.
Brave New World is IMO one of the most important readings. It's also really entertaining. Honestly a pretty good story with a bit of on-the-nose social satire mixed in.
One of my favorites 😊
8:00 a lot of people who make bad decisions and need help can be like tragic clowns that's kind of a good allagory for addiction actually
Every good book should be controversial because every good book should challenge the world in which it exists.
Now THATS a bar
So if a guy writes a poem about how rape is good and it's seen as controversial that automatically makes the poem "good" ?
@@ilia7729 I didn't say every controversial book is good. I said every good book should be controversial
@@ilia7729
Straw man fallacy at its simplest form
@@creepyfrostbite7535 using an obvious analogy is quite different than the straw man fallacy so you just did a fallacy fallacy
Fun fact: There is a song "Animal In Man" That is legit telling the story of "Animal Farm".
Its basically just a reboot very of "Animal Farm"
And the only reason I know this is because my dad listens to the person who made it music.
The person who made the song is called "Dead Prez" btw. And even more crazy the Album from the song is called "Let's Get Free"
This video tells me that someone has never taken a peek at AO3. Where innocence dies.
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.
What's the full form...also if Lolita is banned for having Pedo Main character...iguess people have not read Blood Meridian
@@TheLivingThanos Archive of our Own. And amateur fiction site where it takes one misclick to get a page full of stories about vore or snuff, cannibalism or other vividly described body horror. They also explicitly allow UA fics.
@@TheLivingThanos judge holden is NOT the main character. he is a major character just not the main one
@@loupnuit1 Aren't those just glorified Fanfics?
Call me crazy, but this video is making me want to write a book that gets banned.
At least in Florida 😂
@markmattimore592 that's easy mode
Just make a kids book involving gay or trans themes. It will be instantly banned in like half the states.
@@KrimsonKattYT Congratulations
@@burner555 Two dudes holding hands? Scandalous
I do happen to own 120 Days of Sodom which was passed down to me by my grandmother, and to be honest it has been sitting on my bookshelf for sometime because I refuse to read the novel too much, but when I did first read into the various chapters it made me think in unspeakable ways.
bro i actually found animal farm at my school lying on a shelf so i decided to read it, it is now one of my favourite books just the last line that was something like "the pig looked at the man then the man looked at the pig then the pig at the man again yet neither could tell the difference" overall just think it has a really deep meaning and displays it beautifily 10/10 definettly read it (sorry bout my spelling)
Does this mean that "The satanic verses" could be the first isekai ever made?
asking the right questions
Depending on your definition of an isekai, technically Dante's Inferno is the first.
@@KokNoker-Dante's Inferno- The Divine Comedy (Italian: Divina Commedia)☝️🤓
@@NEKOSAIKOU.No it’s not you goober. It’s a mockery but at the same time a fictional expository of the Quran and Muhammad written by Salman Rushdie. Honestly I’m tempted to read it cuz frankly I don’t care for Islam and certainly not it’s chomo prophet, might be fun.
This is the weirdest plot twist. 😂
Fun fact, animal farm is a book that the schools in Poland require students to read.
I'm pretty sure the grown ups have interesting and far more accurate names for the ruling animals too. "No, not Napoleon, this one's Stalin. Call him Stalin. Snowball in exile? Are you idiots blind? That's Trotsky!"
lolita, brave new world and animal farm aren't banned, in my secondary school english class we read brave new world and animal farm and my friend has 2 copies of lolita and reads it regularly
Reads it regularly 👀
@@DaInternetBear yeah she's kinda obsessed with it 🤶🏻
*None* of them are banned in basically _any_ first world countries.
@@theomnibenevolence forgive my conern, but do you have any idea of her views on the book. And personal thoughts on its message.
@@melonmale she likes it cus the writing is cool
Actually, I’m pretty sure in Brave New World that marriage isn’t a thing. Everyone belongs to everyone else, after all. And it’s not that they’re *forced* to do these things so much as it’s enforced and reinforced since childhood with things like hypnopedia. And the castes are also designated by intelligence, with Epsilsons being the lowest and Alphas being the highest. So you’re more *born* into a caste rather than forced into one. In fact, the only people that ever really *act out* against the system are Alphas, the most intelligent of the castes. But if they do act out, they’re not tortured or killed by the system, they’re simply sent to an island with like-minded people.
:Animal farm, banned book.
:Decided to make a cartoon movie about it
Fun fact, the carton was commissioned by the CIA to inspire people to overthrow communist governments. One of the British cartoon reviews mentioned something to the effect of it, and that is why the books ending is vastly different and more hopeless than the cartoon.
It isn’t a banned book lol I even talk about it in an essay lol
Fun fact about the anarchist cookbook there are recipes within that book that are specifically designed to eliminate idiots who try to make some of the recipes. Call it a perception check with Darwinism sprinkled in.
Wait really? Like some of the instructions are intentionally wrong to ward off fools?
@@faarisrana3815 yes
You really don’t know what the anarchist cookbook is. All of the weapons and bombs you can create there, are from official legal and public accessible text. The author just collected them to show how militarised the USA is and published it as protest against the Vietnamese war and a brutal society.
This is a great video! I remember a few honorable mentions hehe (Catcher in the Rye, Huck Finn & James Joyce Ulysses)
1:44 IS THAT A ULTRAKILL REFERENCE???
No I know your probably joking around but Gabriel was a real holy figure in the thirsting bible
😭😭😭
Thanks for the book recommendations been needing more to read
1:49 "the life of the prophet Muhammed"
*proceeds to show a picture*
HAHA
Indeed
Problem?
He is now on the same list as the author and doesn't even know it.
I don’t get it…
My class did animal farm for a history project it was a very cool and interesting book about what happened and how the system works in a more “friendly” way.
Animal Farm was critical of communist Russia in a time when the soviets were part of the allies. It could not be open in its criticism so it became a fable.
I once did a brief book report on the Anarchist Cookbook in college. There are 2 things about it that weren't mentioned in the video:
1. The recipes are allegedly unreliable and dangerous to perform, leading to some readers getting severely injured or killed when they tried the recipes. I don't remember who, but someone from the FBI said something along the lines if, "This book is especially bad because it is inaccurate. It's more likely to kill you than help you." They refused to give specifics, but that's probably because of the book being linked to multiple criminal investigations. (I'll also admit that I haven't verified these claims simply because I didn't want accurate pipe bomb recipes to show up in my search history.)
2.: The author of the Anarchist Cookbook later regretted writing the book and has lead multiple efforts to remove it from distribution. None of those efforts have been successful. The publishers now thoroughly own the rights and adamantly refuse to remove the book from store shelves, leading it to still be published and sold for a profit to this very day.
Yeah I remember reading somewhere that the anarchist cookbook was futile in regards to manufacturing explosives, because the individual was oblivious to bomb making, I also remember hearing that when I saw a documentary on the columbine shooting, Dylan and Eric had a copy of the book and they attempted to make propane bombs in duffel bags and they were timed to explode in the cafeteria when it was the most densely populated, but they were poorly made. Still, it's heart wrenching that happened.
I think He might have missed a book involving a know Leader from the 40's..
Winston Churchill’s stay drunk & smoke cigars health book?
@@jamesholland8057 mhm..
He meant Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler’s autobiography
I mean, they are reading that book in german schools to point out where the narrative falls apart, so I guess that cant be considered banned anymore.
@@tibik.8407 aint noone in Germany is Reading dat Shit, where you get that from??