The Name of God in the Bible : Yahweh or Yehovah?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @dawnk5208
    @dawnk5208 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jesus came in his name - Truth
    “And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another COMFORTER, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the SPIRIT OF TRUTH; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.” John 14:16-17‬

  • @alexanderolkhovskiy8272
    @alexanderolkhovskiy8272 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you only read King James Version?

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, I don't read just the KJV but also use "One New Man Bible", Interlinear BIble, "Tree of Life" Bible, The Cepher, and more...what do you use?

    • @alexanderolkhovskiy8272
      @alexanderolkhovskiy8272 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      EndlessWonder ok, fair enough. For now i am only reading KJV unless God points me into direction of other translations but as of now i haven’t seen any better. I was born in Russia and it doesn’t only seem to be the best so far in the English language but in Russian too.

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexanderolkhovskiy8272 I'm so glad you like the KJV because that remains my favorite!

  • @targetedtruthergirl6726
    @targetedtruthergirl6726 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yahweh Yehovah in Hebrew means to fall out to be greedy to covet that is not our creator, Jesus said to pray OUR FATHER when he was on the cross he cried out Eli Not Yehovah/Yahweh

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I do mention calling him" Father" and you would be correct. But Nehemiah Gordon does a great job hunting for the NAME of the Almighty mentioned in Exodus. I go with his studies.
      I. יהוה is not used by E in Genesis, but is given Exodus 3:12-15 as the name of the God who revealed Himself to Moses at Horeb, and is explained thus : אֶהְיֶה עִמָּ֑ךְ I shall be with thee (Exodus 3:12), which is then implied in אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה I shall be the one who will be it Exodus 3:14a (i.e: with thee Exodus 3:12) and then compressed into אֶהְיֶה Exodus 3:14b (i.e. with thee Exodus 3:12), which then is given in the nominal form יהוה He who will be it Exodus 3:15 (i.e. with thee Exodus 3:12). compare EwBTh ii. 337, 338 RSl.c., Proph. 385 ff. Other interpretations are: I am he who I am, i.e. it is no concern of yours (Le Clerc LagPsalt.Hieron.156); I am (this is my name), inasmuch as I am (אֲשֶׁר = כִּי; AE JDMich WeJD Th xxi, 540 = compare Hexateuch 72); Di and others I am who I am, he who is essentially unnameable, inexplicable, - E uses יהוה sparingly by the side of אלהים and האלהים in his subsequent narrative. The Ephraimitic writers in Judges Samuel Kings use it in similar proportions. P abstains from the use of יהוה until he gives an account of its revelation to Moses Exodus 6:3; but subsequently uses it freely. He gives no explanation of its meaning. He represents that אֵל שַׁדַּי was the God of the patriarchs. J uses יהוה from the beginning of his narrative, possibly explaining it, Genesis 21:83 by אל עולם, the evergreen tamarisk being a symbol of the ever-living God; compare De Genesis 21:33. Elsewhere יהוה is the common divine name in pre-exilic writers, but in post-exilic writers gradually falls into disuse, and is supplanted by אלהים and אדני. In Job it is used 31 t. in prose parts, and Job 12:9 (a proverb); not elsewhere in the poem. Chronicles apart from his sources prefers אלהים and האלהים. Daniel uses יהוה only in chap. 9 (7 t.); Ecclesiastes not at all. In the Elohistic group of Psalm 42-83 it is used 39 t. (see אלהים) . It occurs as the name of Israel's God MI18. It is doubtful whether it was used by other branches of the Shemitic family, compare COT Genesis 2:4b DlPa 158 ff. DrStud. Bib. i. 7 ff.

  • @Esquire1995
    @Esquire1995 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know the name, how about the correct image. It all matters. Shalom

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Correct image?

    • @Esquire1995
      @Esquire1995 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      EndlessWonder of whom you call Jesus, the Israelites were not even close to caucasian , it is culturally inaccurate. Shalom

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think there had to be a good mix of different races with the Israelites. We can't forget Bilhah and Zilpah that were handmaidens of Leah and Rachel who married Yaakov. Then of course, all the other marriages over the years. Let's not forget Ruth and Rahab from Yeshua's bloodline. Very interesting!

    • @yarash3354
      @yarash3354 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      EndlessWonder --Do you suppose that Yah was only kidding and winking when He commanded the Israelites not to mix and intermarry with pagan/heathen races? When He gave the 7th commandment-thou shall not commit adultery- when polygamy was the norm then- do you think that meant don’t cheat on your spouse??? Did He have to repeat Himself with the 10th commandment not to covet? No. The 7th commandment is to not adulterate their bloodline with pagan/heathen/satanic seed.
      Bilhah and Zilpha were adamites-they were not from pagans/heathens races. Both Ruth and Rahab were pure blooded Israelites. Do you suppose Yah would mix the bloodline that Yahusha would come though, with that of other races or the serpent seed, making Him a hybrid mongrel? Then He can not be the spotless Lamb, and His blood can no more be precious or efficacious. Please be careful.
      The hour is late and we need to sound the shofar loud. We can’t afford to be “politically correct” anymore, at the risk of injuring someone with emotional fragility and amalgamate everyone into a trough and call them brethren. Not everyone who joins themselves to Israel and keeps Yah’s laws and commandments are brethren.
      shalom

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      If Rahab was not from a pagan people, why would the Father wish to destroy them all at the hands of the Israelites? I don't know what race she was from but she was adopted into the tribe of Judah through marriage. Ruth was not an Israelite, she was a Moabite. Ruth was grafted into the tribe of Judah through Boaz. We don't know what race Bilhah and Zilpah were, they came from Laban's territory. Yeshua said not to be concerned about "bloodlines". So I'm not! I do believe that Colton Burpo and Akiane saw Yeshua and are great witnesses to what Yeshua looks like! Remember, He promised to darken the skins of the Israelites and our newly found African Hebrew tribe points to that happening. But he didn't darken them all. He spread them to the 4 corners of the globe. So we are all colors. You can't deny the facts.

  • @billyringo2able
    @billyringo2able 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have to understand the bible with the Jehovah witnesse who tell his name for over a centurie they are the only one who tell the truth...they the only real christian in this mess world.... they are the only one who revele the true nature of the all mighty listen to them

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Church is not under a steepled Church...Lovers of the Father, followers of His Word, those are the members of His Bride. They come in all shapes and sizes, not a denomination. Have a relationship with the Father not a Church! Bless you brother!

  • @Illalcap
    @Illalcap 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yod Heh UaU Heh . Yes the W makes a literal U U sound not V. That is also Germanic (German W makes a V sound.) Have to go all the way back to Paleo Hebrew. That's sound like Yahuah .

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Getting evidence that goes that far back is difficult. Nehemia was able to go as far back as Yeshua's time to see if he used the Yehovah and he did. The Hopi's call the great spirit "Yehu...which is interesting to consider! They write it Jehu...but there is no J sound in Hebrew.
      When I used to use the name Yahuah for the Father (Cepher Bible) it reminds me of "Yahoo" we use to day in glee and merriment. Wouldn't we say that if we spoke His name in jubilance?
      It's possible. But the "Jews " would know it best. So for now, with the many witnesses found for Yehovah, I'll hold to it until I learn otherwise! Heavenly Father is a great compromise!

  • @sojournsojourntraveler1203
    @sojournsojourntraveler1203 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    YHWH
    Once again I see where you are about creating and spreading confusion .
    Our father YHWH knows out hearts.
    We are to know each other by the fruit of our action.
    I am out of here.

    • @Tribulatoryfighter
      @Tribulatoryfighter  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is "confusiing" if you have over 1000 transcripts that use the name of Yehovah? What name did Yeshua use to speak the name of YHWH? Yehovah as Nehemiah shows.

    • @sojournsojourntraveler1203
      @sojournsojourntraveler1203 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      A lie told a 100 times + is still a lie./1000 transcripts mean nothing.
      See Alan Horvath on this subject for a comprehensive explanation.
      Best wishes

    • @braznartn5176
      @braznartn5176 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sojourn I'm familiar with Alan Horvath he's (was) a great teacher. But no need for the negativity.