You have deliberately forgot about AWACs and ground based radars they can easily detect and track F-16 and can provide information to Su-35 or any other Russian fighter jets
@@Grid88 And if you're talking a Ukraine scenario (no block 70s) then you'll need to add in the F-16s being low and slow on the deck due to GBAD, whilst the SU-35S will be high and fast lobbing R-37M from well beyond the range of any AMRAAM. Plus the superior EW on the Russian jet, the lack of AEW of the opponent and the outlook becomes pretty grim.
@@AuthurFoxache even if you are rigth it is technically inferior to f-16, it is actually an integrated system with other air defense systems. An example situation, a pair of f 16s take off, the Russians detect them and take off against them. The F 16 launches rockets with a range of 160 km. direction of some target and turns back, but deliberately flies at low speed. The idea is that a hypothetical pair of Su 35s would be in range of a Patriot system, but it was turned off and hidden while the F16s passed over it. A salvo from the Patriot and Su 35 have been taken down. Other systems that are cheaper with a smaller range can be deployed, working on the same principle, i.e. air defense traps.
@@radislavrashev7266 LOL, F-16s block 15 cannot see that far - they would use link & will fire from much closer. But the question is - will they fire at all or be scrapped by then. Russia can engage from well over the AIM 120 range & this was proven in Ukraine with lots of aircraft downed. Patriot system has low range as well - it has proven very ineffective in actual combat in Ukraine. The reason why Ukraine is getting old stuff is partly availability partly an excuse for when they get scrapped.
@@johnwinter7597size matters A smaller radar is still more limited even if its AESA the Irbis-E despite being a PESA is considered the best PESA out there and the only difference is the way they scan The actual capability of detection and maintaining lock-on of both arrays is very similar
@@uaberk Yes, the Su-35 is impressive, but not as much as the F-22 Raptor that shot down a 100-euro Chinese balloon and a dozen intergalactic flying saucers. 🎈🛸🤫🤭🤗
On paper su35 is the more capable jet, but the Russians don't have many of them, most of there fleet is su27, the su35 is an upgraded version of su27. F16s don't need to go one on one with Russian jets, they need to keep the sky open and block Russian access, just having them in the sky will do about 90% of the work, the Russians will be forced to stay further away and will loose many more planes. Not only that it will allow the Ukrainian forces to rely more on air support which will give them more open areas to manoeuvrer.
Su35 has enormous range missiles. Actually su35 has longest range missiles in the world aswell as and excellent radar. Bvr also has excellent jamming systems. Its an absolute beast of the skies. Considering its radar etc i would say su35 bvr can challenge any jet in the world easly.
doesnt matter how range youre missiles has,,, if youre pesa radar doesnt seeing the enemy, youre only sitting duck with long range air missiles,,,,@@Stockfish1511
The Su-35 Irbis E radar has a target detection range of up to 360 - 400 km, radiation power of 20 kW. This is a record. The Su-35 is armed with R-37M air-to-air missiles with a range of 200 km. Modern modifications of the F-16 are equipped with AN AN/APG-83 SABR AFAR radar with a detection range of typical targets of 165 km, armed with AIM-9 Sidewinder of various modifications with a maximum range of 96 km. The pilot of the F-16 will not even understand who destroyed it.
@MM-hz6bg only reason being is AWACS,against GOAT sandal warriors! Russia has its own AWACS and satellite images of everything happening in real time!
Actually the detection range of the new aesa for the f16 is about the same as 300km. You also compared a fox 3 hypersonic to a fox 2 short range irccm missile. Which are completely different things and shouldn’t be remotely compared. You should rather compare it to the new aim 260 or the meteor missile. Also, the range of 200km is for a best case scenario, fly straight towards the missile kind of fight, and that never happens, as you’ve probably seen the video of the f16 dodging 6 sam missiles with no chaff/flares, all pilots have the training to defend against incoming missiles. You need to learn more about the tactics and understand how actual bvr fights go before you can say if something is better than the other. Seeing as the f16v and su35 are both modernized 4+ gen aircraft with advanced radars and missiles. As far as bvr fights go, these, rn from publicly available information these are evenly matched.
Depends who is flying it. If it is Ukrainians who have barely trained a year on the plane and spent 1/3 of that training learning English to actually be able to be trained on the plane it may be 9/10 or worse. With high trained American pilots it is a much more fair fight. Still it could probably be killed from outside of F-16 missile range. The R-37 got the longest range air to air kill in history when it shot down a Ukranian SUV-37 from 140 miles away. That alone tilts this heavily in favor of SU35 even with absolute best western pilotdx
This is not exactly apples to apples - F-35 is a heavy long range strike aircraft. F-16V is a light, cheap fighter. A better comparison would be F-15EX. Comparisons are a bit misleading as it would be system fight, Russians in defense and US in attack. Also Su-35 does not have a true PESA radar - its a AESA - PESA hybrid. Both in BVR and VVR Su-35 has clear edge.
23 วันที่ผ่านมา
like it's multiple T/R "controllers" for all "antenna elements" - not 1-1 like true AESA, but in range of ~1-10?
I have seen russian su35 bvr pilot interview week ago, when asked about f35 he actually said its just piar crap. He said their radar can detect stealth aircraft hundreds of kilometers away. Also he said that people that think because you get detected far away means its advantage are full of shit. He said he can easly avoid missiles shot hundred kiloemeters away. Meaning if f35 detects and shoots first it wont matter he will avoid it. Besides he said his radar can also said his missiles are longer range than any us jet missile
@@Stockfish1511 but we have to say that they do things that russian jets don't ... like diving from aircraft carriers go missing for a day or 2 ... land weirdly like the one in texas .... etc.etc.etc. this dude is so but so delusional that he didn't mention the the su-35 has aesa radar and 5'th gen avionics .... that carrys long range missiles .... and he compares it with the F-16 .-. i seen F-16's being downd by s-200 systems in iran ..... we talking about soviet era s-200 systems .-. ..... these and american youtubers speculate about russian jets like they are some kind of sergey bogdan .....😪
su35 is a completely diffrent class. the only thing the f22 has on the su35 is stealth which isnt what it once was the su35 can pick the f22 up at bvr ranges. f16 is a suped up honda civic the su35 is a buggati
Look, I’m not a fan of America but the radar on F-22 is a lot better than an SU-35. F-22 has such a low radar cross section too. Even if ground based radars or AWACS pick up F-22 and relay information, it will be hard for SU-35 to get missile lock before it is too late. It’s be a different story if USSR hadn’t broken apart or even with SU-57 but it is really not a fair comparison between SU-35 and F-22. Thing is it doesn’t matter for Russia. They have no plans of attacking NATO or USA. NATO knows if they attack Russia that Russia will not pull punches and will have to use tactical and possibly strategic weapons. The F-22 can’t do shit if all the bases within combat range are annihilated along with the plane. F-35 can’t do shit when its carriers are sunk.
@@YankeeVatnik1917 yeah, as IRST is getting a lot better it can be combined with to help out. Still doesn’t have the range. It’s really different with Russia though because they won’t be invading NATO and only defending against NATO attack so they will have lots of layered air defense systems to go with AWACS and planes. S350, S400 and S500 at various angles WILL be able to detect F-22 and F-35 a lot farther than straight on. Another thing is “AI.” I’m not sure the level it has gotten too hit at some point it will be a lot easier to decipher and track even something with such a small cross section as it is still flying like a jet. No insect will he flying that fast. It still takes a shitload of processing power to do this in real time and then communicate it to operators and it is yet again a different thing to get a lock. The S350, 400 and 500 having very large and separate search radars and engage by radars does favor that over planes at greater ranges. There is also intercepting the radar of F-35 and F22. They have low proof intercept radar so it is very hard to detect it as an actual signal coming from a plane, especially if you factor in jamming. Any progress Russia or China may have made to do this would be something extremely secret and is a trump card you wanna hold real close. You have to factor in that getting and a lock and hit when you factor those two things are in play is tough and jamming makes it much worse. Even though NATO is nowhere near Russia on this it’s not like they are slouches. That does go two ways though and makes American stealth planes much less effective. I think the AI(future) and jamming are things that can even it in Russia’s favor because they are defending. If Russian Jamming is effective and the jets have to get a lot closer to Russian resources to do anything then the stealth is definitely not helping them so much. Don’t get me wrong, Russia has the longest beyond visual range kills both in an aircraft and from a SAM but we can’t pretend that even an S-400 is likely to be capable of hitting an F-35 or F-22 like they shot down a Ukrainian fighter. Other western planes will have trouble from S-400 within several hundred miles though. We will see this with Ukrainian F-16s, even if they wind up piloted by western contractors.
I would argue that detection range and missile range is the only thing of importance here. The fact that the SU 35 detects the Viper first is not correct, the E warfare suite in the wiper is here the most important factor. I would argue that a it is a coin flip between the two.
It most certainly is, but Russians don't fight as a network. The USAF uses their Air Power as a fighting network. Every aircraft asset has a specific role in the fight. Overall the US pilots have way more flight time than their Russian counterparts. The avionics of NATO Fighters pretty much outmatch any thrust vectoring you can throw at it.
You can't really compare post Soviet era Jets against the F-16 as we don't really know how good the technology is in the SU-35 all we have is what Russia tell us. Maybe in 2024 these two birds will cross paths.
the conclusion you made ..."that AESA radar is better then PESA" is not very accurate in my opinion. At the very least we should be able to agree that the russians have very good AESA radars but opted to use the PESA for the SU-35 (on the mig-35 the customer can choose either PESA or AESA).
PESA is used for BVR detection and long range missiles have locking capability with IR ,visual and radar lock from 100s of miles! US fighter planes have advantages over countries that don't have counter measures from long range radar overseeing the entire sky!
Sensless comparison, old F-16 from 70th years against 4++ generation jet SU-35. This superjet is superior to F-16 in ANY respect, larger, faster, longer flight range, better maneuverability (superior to any NATO jet), carries more weapons, has longer ranging rockets. F-16 will even not reach promising position for using its weapons. Prior to that it will be shot from sky. Addionally ukranian pilots are just able to fly the jet, but have few operation training on it. This training takes 4 years. On the other hand russian air force is now, after 2.5 years of war, world's most combat-proved one.
The latest variant "different beast" does nothing to change the fact that an F-16 is not a match for an Su-35. I don't even think that it would be a match for a nerfed-spec Su-30 export variant, let alone the real McCoy.
All that maneuverability means squat for the SU-35. It’s all about radar, weapons systems, pilot training & a virtually unlimited military defense budget 🇺🇸. Sorry Russia 🇷🇺.
In air to air combat an F-16 outmatching a SU-35? No way, unless the pilot of that SU-35 is a moron having in his control the lethal pride of Russia who can even dogfight an F-22 Stealth jet if the F-22 will not use its long range missiles.
No F16 Can not. 1. SU 35 is a heavy fighter 2. SU has 2 engine 3. SU has vectoring Those two absolutely different fighters. In dogfight SU 35 just smash the F16. BVR 50/50 Plus 1sq/meter SU35 can see at 270 Km away (160 Miles), With AWAC A50 up to 230 Miles away. 37M can shootdown the target at 240 Miles away (clamed). Welcome to check if it's not true.
The su 30 can out maneuver the F-16 below 200kts. Anything above and f-16 can turn tighter and harder. BVR is not even a question. The Vioer has an AESA 83 SAB aka the F-35 radar. Theres a reason why Russia is foaming at the mouth over Ukraine getting the F-16 (political views aside)
In the Russia-Ukraine conflict we see the 'quality' of US weapons in the counteroffensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those weaponries are the PRICE and the SPEED in which its destroyed. Its opinionated that the US has the most expensive weaponries in the world, while Russia has the strongest, advance, resilient and experience military in the world.
Listen Russian tolls. If you think the US is allowing the F16 to be introduced into theater and have it look bad? Well ask the unfortunate pilots who’ve faced US aircraft, and tactics, face to face which aircraft they’d rather be flying. DONT FORGET THE BODY BAGS
thats the whole point…avg flite time for Russian pilots, 3hrs /month….compared to US drivers 20hrs plus…its all abt flight time and training…doesnt matter what you’re flying, if you’re behind the power curve , you are toast
How many wars the US has ever won, at least against a formidable opponent like the Russian-Federation? How did only sandal-clads Talibans on bicycles can chased out the USMC-NATO forces with tails between their legs out of Afghanistan?
Afghans did the same thing to you guys back when you were much bigger or did you seriously not know that lol. You poor Russian sheep Ukraine is destroying your country and they have less than half the army you guys have. Ukraine received handful of our older technology and now you guys are using old scrap from the 50s because you lost most of your better equipment the world is laughing at you.
Id wager based on recent evemt f16 is far superior or any new us mil tech for that matter.... Ruzzkia losing all type of air assets in large quantity..
Ruzzkia pilot get %50 of flight training hours as us pilots... amd it's inferior training also. Russia is clealry.toast.. is even losing to Ukraine weak air force...
Great production and info! With an AWACs in theater, the F-16 will know where the enemy is even though it cannot detect it with on board radar, then engage at missile range with its own radar. Also, I do not believe that the Russians have anything as good as the AIM-120. In BVR the missile matters as much, if not more, than the plane. Close in WVR the Viper is probably toast though.
@@ravencookie5141yes and combat proven with tough adversary like Ukraine fighters, R37 world record stand 245km and her distance is 400km not like video say.
The answer was 20 years ago answered when the Russians announced their new Su-35, and the answer remains: The F-16 will defeat that plane anytime any day, 100% of the time
@polduseri909 Very soon we will find out how everything will really be. After the United States puts its F16s in Ukraine, I'm afraid you will be very disappointed.
![จบจนได้ ! | Black Myth: Wukong #007 [ตอนจบ?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DSqvWndF0sw/mqdefault.jpg)
You have deliberately forgot about AWACs and ground based radars they can easily detect and track F-16 and can provide information to Su-35 or any other Russian fighter jets
This was a one to one comparison. With AWACS it 'd be a different game altogether.
@@Grid88 And if you're talking a Ukraine scenario (no block 70s) then you'll need to add in the F-16s being low and slow on the deck due to GBAD, whilst the SU-35S will be high and fast lobbing R-37M from well beyond the range of any AMRAAM. Plus the superior EW on the Russian jet, the lack of AEW of the opponent and the outlook becomes pretty grim.
@@AuthurFoxache
even if you are rigth it is technically inferior to f-16, it is actually an integrated system with other air defense systems.
An example situation, a pair of f 16s take off, the Russians detect them and take off against them. The F 16 launches rockets with a range of 160 km. direction of some target and turns back, but deliberately flies at low speed. The idea is that a hypothetical pair of Su 35s would be in range of a Patriot system, but it was turned off and hidden while the F16s passed over it. A salvo from the Patriot and Su 35 have been taken down.
Other systems that are cheaper with a smaller range can be deployed, working on the same principle, i.e. air defense traps.
@@radislavrashev7266 LOL, F-16s block 15 cannot see that far - they would use link & will fire from much closer. But the question is - will they fire at all or be scrapped by then. Russia can engage from well over the AIM 120 range & this was proven in Ukraine with lots of aircraft downed.
Patriot system has low range as well - it has proven very ineffective in actual combat in Ukraine.
The reason why Ukraine is getting old stuff is partly availability partly an excuse for when they get scrapped.
You should have compared it with the new f15 the f16 isn’t really in the same category of fighter as a su35
F16 block 72 equipped with APG 83 is in a different league.
If they are so good why are they not being used in Ukraine to take over the skies
Because someone is making a lot of money with this war.
I believe one SU35 was shot down in ukraine actually
Ukraine migs are not a match for them
They’re afraid too. The world will see first hands Russian equipment and tactics are fourth rate, they don’t even deserve the title of second rate
They do. The Americans already the wreckage of a downed su-35.
The SU-35 can beat the F-16 on any day with both hands down.
Better in an air show but it’s dead before it even knows the f16 is there there radars sucks so bad that old jet have a chance
@@johnwinter7597size matters
A smaller radar is still more limited even if its AESA
the Irbis-E despite being a PESA is considered the best PESA out there and the only difference is the way they scan
The actual capability of detection and maintaining lock-on of both arrays is very similar
BS@@johnwinter7597
@@johnwinter7597 Source? Oh thats right your not a real pilot.. Your Just another ignorant American fanboy thinking you know it all.
@@ravencookie5141 He's still going to assume the Su-35 stand no chance agianst the F-16 because its american. They think like that.
The SU-35 is quite impressive.
For what, againts birds?
@@uaberk First of all , you are stupid. Second, SU-35 is thrust vectored with 600kw IRBIS radar. F-16 is easy prey for such fighter.
@@uaberk Yes, the Su-35 is impressive, but not as much as the F-22 Raptor that shot down a 100-euro Chinese balloon and a dozen intergalactic flying saucers. 🎈🛸🤫🤭🤗
On paper su35 is the more capable jet, but the Russians don't have many of them, most of there fleet is su27, the su35 is an upgraded version of su27. F16s don't need to go one on one with Russian jets, they need to keep the sky open and block Russian access, just having them in the sky will do about 90% of the work, the Russians will be forced to stay further away and will loose many more planes. Not only that it will allow the Ukrainian forces to rely more on air support which will give them more open areas to manoeuvrer.
🤧😏🤭
The essential point is left out: in whose airspace the battle is taking place. Think air defense! :)
Su35 has enormous range missiles. Actually su35 has longest range missiles in the world aswell as and excellent radar. Bvr also has excellent jamming systems. Its an absolute beast of the skies. Considering its radar etc i would say su35 bvr can challenge any jet in the world easly.
😂
@@MM-hz6bg whats so funny
doesnt matter how range youre missiles has,,, if youre pesa radar doesnt seeing the enemy, youre only sitting duck with long range air missiles,,,,@@Stockfish1511
Russian missiles are notoriously old and over stated.
@@markever234 😂😂
The Su-35 Irbis E radar has a target detection range of up to 360 - 400 km, radiation power of 20 kW. This is a record. The Su-35 is armed with R-37M air-to-air missiles with a range of 200 km. Modern modifications of the F-16 are equipped with AN AN/APG-83 SABR AFAR radar with a detection range of typical targets of 165 km, armed with AIM-9 Sidewinder of various modifications with a maximum range of 96 km.
The pilot of the F-16 will not even understand who destroyed it.
What are the kill ratios for US planes V Russian hype. Sad 😞
@@MM-hz6bg Yes, it is sad for Americans. Do you know what the alley of migs is?
Russia wouldn’t stand a chance against the USA in a conventional war, USA would have air superiority within a week !! 😉
@MM-hz6bg only reason being is AWACS,against GOAT sandal warriors! Russia has its own AWACS and satellite images of everything happening in real time!
Actually the detection range of the new aesa for the f16 is about the same as 300km. You also compared a fox 3 hypersonic to a fox 2 short range irccm missile. Which are completely different things and shouldn’t be remotely compared. You should rather compare it to the new aim 260 or the meteor missile. Also, the range of 200km is for a best case scenario, fly straight towards the missile kind of fight, and that never happens, as you’ve probably seen the video of the f16 dodging 6 sam missiles with no chaff/flares, all pilots have the training to defend against incoming missiles. You need to learn more about the tactics and understand how actual bvr fights go before you can say if something is better than the other. Seeing as the f16v and su35 are both modernized 4+ gen aircraft with advanced radars and missiles. As far as bvr fights go, these, rn from publicly available information these are evenly matched.
No f-16 would get shot down 9 times out of 10 against su -35
Depends who is flying it. If it is Ukrainians who have barely trained a year on the plane and spent 1/3 of that training learning English to actually be able to be trained on the plane it may be 9/10 or worse. With high trained American pilots it is a much more fair fight. Still it could probably be killed from outside of F-16 missile range. The R-37 got the longest range air to air kill in history when it shot down a Ukranian SUV-37 from 140 miles away. That alone tilts this heavily in favor of SU35 even with absolute best western pilotdx
This is not exactly apples to apples - F-35 is a heavy long range strike aircraft. F-16V is a light, cheap fighter.
A better comparison would be F-15EX.
Comparisons are a bit misleading as it would be system fight, Russians in defense and US in attack.
Also Su-35 does not have a true PESA radar - its a AESA - PESA hybrid.
Both in BVR and VVR Su-35 has clear edge.
like it's multiple T/R "controllers" for all "antenna elements" - not 1-1 like true AESA, but in range of ~1-10?
Interesting & Comprehensive Video, I'd like to see the Su-35 vs the M-22 Raptor, THX Grid 88. 🇺🇸
Noted!
@@Grid88 Thank You Sir. 🇺🇸
What’s an m-22?
Su 35 win
Yes pilots needed game board
Great content keep it up
Appreciate it
SU35 is better but Don't underestimate f16 and it's pilot which have been under constant rigorous training all around year compare to SU 35
Depends on the power of the radar.First one detect the other has a huge advantange.
Apart from the radar capability, the aircraft should have excellent avionics and missile to hit with accuracy in BVR engagements.
I have seen russian su35 bvr pilot interview week ago, when asked about f35 he actually said its just piar crap. He said their radar can detect stealth aircraft hundreds of kilometers away. Also he said that people that think because you get detected far away means its advantage are full of shit. He said he can easly avoid missiles shot hundred kiloemeters away. Meaning if f35 detects and shoots first it wont matter he will avoid it. Besides he said his radar can also said his missiles are longer range than any us jet missile
@@Stockfish1511troll
@@Stockfish1511 but we have to say that they do things that russian jets don't ... like diving from aircraft carriers go missing for a day or 2 ... land weirdly like the one in texas .... etc.etc.etc. this dude is so but so delusional that he didn't mention the the su-35 has aesa radar and 5'th gen avionics .... that carrys long range missiles .... and he compares it with the F-16 .-. i seen F-16's being downd by s-200 systems in iran ..... we talking about soviet era s-200 systems .-. ..... these and american youtubers speculate about russian jets like they are some kind of sergey bogdan .....😪
yes and odds are the russian AWACS will detect the f16 rather then the su35. Also the AWACS will engage the s400 rather than the su35.
You can only compare the Su 35 with F35
2:21 - Conversion mistake. Su-35: 2778 km/h - F-16: 2470 km/h. Long live metric!
SU-35 is only impressive while doing airshows. Just saying.. LOL
you,ll see soon enough
🥱
Isn't fair comparison.
Su 35 should be compared with f 15.
su35 is a completely diffrent class. the only thing the f22 has on the su35 is stealth which isnt what it once was the su35 can pick the f22 up at bvr ranges. f16 is a suped up honda civic the su35 is a buggati
Look, I’m not a fan of America but the radar on F-22 is a lot better than an SU-35. F-22 has such a low radar cross section too. Even if ground based radars or AWACS pick up F-22 and relay information, it will be hard for SU-35 to get missile lock before it is too late.
It’s be a different story if USSR hadn’t broken apart or even with SU-57 but it is really not a fair comparison between SU-35 and F-22.
Thing is it doesn’t matter for Russia. They have no plans of attacking NATO or USA. NATO knows if they attack Russia that Russia will not pull punches and will have to use tactical and possibly strategic weapons. The F-22 can’t do shit if all the bases within combat range are annihilated along with the plane. F-35 can’t do shit when its carriers are sunk.
@@TheGrindcorps yeah but the truth is stealth becoming less and less important cot
@@YankeeVatnik1917 yeah, as IRST is getting a lot better it can be combined with to help out. Still doesn’t have the range. It’s really different with Russia though because they won’t be invading NATO and only defending against NATO attack so they will have lots of layered air defense systems to go with AWACS and planes. S350, S400 and S500 at various angles WILL be able to detect F-22 and F-35 a lot farther than straight on. Another thing is “AI.” I’m not sure the level it has gotten too hit at some point it will be a lot easier to decipher and track even something with such a small cross section as it is still flying like a jet. No insect will he flying that fast. It still takes a shitload of processing power to do this in real time and then communicate it to operators and it is yet again a different thing to get a lock. The S350, 400 and 500 having very large and separate search radars and engage by radars does favor that over planes at greater ranges.
There is also intercepting the radar of F-35 and F22. They have low proof intercept radar so it is very hard to detect it as an actual signal coming from a plane, especially if you factor in jamming. Any progress Russia or China may have made to do this would be something extremely secret and is a trump card you wanna hold real close.
You have to factor in that getting and a lock and hit when you factor those two things are in play is tough and jamming makes it much worse. Even though NATO is nowhere near Russia on this it’s not like they are slouches.
That does go two ways though and makes American stealth planes much less effective. I think the AI(future) and jamming are things that can even it in Russia’s favor because they are defending. If Russian Jamming is effective and the jets have to get a lot closer to Russian resources to do anything then the stealth is definitely not helping them so much.
Don’t get me wrong, Russia has the longest beyond visual range kills both in an aircraft and from a SAM but we can’t pretend that even an S-400 is likely to be capable of hitting an F-35 or F-22 like they shot down a Ukrainian fighter. Other western planes will have trouble from S-400 within several hundred miles though. We will see this with Ukrainian F-16s, even if they wind up piloted by western contractors.
I would argue that detection range and missile range is the only thing of importance here. The fact that the SU 35 detects the Viper first is not correct, the E warfare suite in the wiper is here the most important factor. I would argue that a it is a coin flip between the two.
Make a video on F-15EX vs SU-35
Already done. Check it out. th-cam.com/video/xIKYb8IuvFQ/w-d-xo.html
F-16 block 72 better>>>>>than su-35
Keep on going!👍💯
I will!
That’s what she said lol
السوخوي استطاعت استهداف طائرة أخرى من مسافة 213 كيلو متر وهذا خارج نطاق أي صاروخ أمريكي
The Su-35 is better than F-16.
I can't agree with you more
😂😅
But not as good as the F16 block
It most certainly is, but Russians don't fight as a network. The USAF uses their Air Power as a fighting network. Every aircraft asset has a specific role in the fight. Overall the US pilots have way more flight time than their Russian counterparts.
The avionics of NATO Fighters pretty much outmatch any thrust vectoring you can throw at it.
thrust vectoring wont stop a missile
F-16 my favorite jet of all time
You can't really compare post Soviet era Jets against the F-16 as we don't really know how good the technology is in the SU-35 all we have is what Russia tell us. Maybe in 2024 these two birds will cross paths.
Why u comparing su 35 with f 16 , India shoot down f 16 with mig 21😂. Compair it with f 35 or f 22
Manevrabtlity of Suhoi is 3times better
the conclusion you made ..."that AESA radar is better then PESA" is not very accurate in my opinion. At the very least we should be able to agree that the russians have very good AESA radars but opted to use the PESA for the SU-35 (on the mig-35 the customer can choose either PESA or AESA).
PESA is used for BVR detection and long range missiles have locking capability with IR ,visual and radar lock from 100s of miles! US fighter planes have advantages over countries that don't have counter measures from long range radar overseeing the entire sky!
You only can tell in a real situation.
Well they couldn't even beat earlier model of j10 in pla drills.
Sensless comparison, old F-16 from 70th years against 4++ generation jet SU-35. This superjet is superior to F-16 in ANY respect, larger, faster, longer flight range, better maneuverability (superior to any NATO jet), carries more weapons, has longer ranging rockets. F-16 will even not reach promising position for using its weapons. Prior to that it will be shot from sky. Addionally ukranian pilots are just able to fly the jet, but have few operation training on it. This training takes 4 years. On the other hand russian air force is now, after 2.5 years of war, world's most combat-proved one.
FIGHTING DONE BVR
The latest variant "different beast" does nothing to change the fact that an F-16 is not a match for an Su-35. I don't even think that it would be a match for a nerfed-spec Su-30 export variant, let alone the real McCoy.
Dude, with that CFTs that's on it F-16 isn't to going outmaneuver anything
Su35 for sure
15m vs 22m😂😂
The RCS of SU-35 is 1m2 - 3m2
The Su35 wins by every means!.
I choose Su35!💪👍🇷🇺💯
All that maneuverability means squat for the SU-35. It’s all about radar, weapons systems, pilot training & a virtually unlimited military defense budget 🇺🇸. Sorry Russia 🇷🇺.
In air to air combat an F-16 outmatching a SU-35? No way, unless the pilot of that SU-35 is a moron having in his control the lethal pride of Russia who can even dogfight an F-22 Stealth jet if the F-22 will not use its long range missiles.
I Love F16❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
No F16 Can not.
1. SU 35 is a heavy fighter
2. SU has 2 engine
3. SU has vectoring
Those two absolutely different fighters. In dogfight SU 35 just smash the F16. BVR 50/50
Plus 1sq/meter SU35 can see at 270 Km away (160 Miles), With AWAC A50 up to 230 Miles away. 37M can shootdown the target at 240 Miles away (clamed). Welcome to check if it's not true.
F16 new variant is very strong
@@paologonzales4516 No Doubts. But How you would compare RAM 1500 truck and Honda Fit RS? :)) Both fast and awesome. The devil is in the details. ;)
The su 30 can out maneuver the F-16 below 200kts. Anything above and f-16 can turn tighter and harder. BVR is not even a question. The Vioer has an AESA 83 SAB aka the F-35 radar. Theres a reason why Russia is foaming at the mouth over Ukraine getting the F-16 (political views aside)
Yeah,Russia is foaming over 500K KIA and entire Eastern Ukraine becoming Russian!
Su35 was built to engage F22 not that old relic
In the Russia-Ukraine conflict we see the 'quality' of US weapons in the counteroffensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those weaponries are the PRICE and the SPEED in which its destroyed. Its opinionated that the US has the most expensive weaponries in the world, while Russia has the strongest, advance, resilient and experience military in the world.
Not only that.Russia has the most cheapest military weapons in the world!👍🇷🇺💯
what is your point less sarcasm?
Lmfao
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🐂💩
That's why Russia buys its weapons from North Korea and Iran. Very high quality 🤣
МОЛИТЕСЬ СИЛЬНЕЕ Ф - 16 КАК СТРАШНО ВАС БУДУТ СБИВАТЬ РУССКИЕ ЛЁТЧИКИ . ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤.БРАВО В.В.ПУТИН
Sukhoi Su 35 S Fighter Jet 🇷🇺 💪🔥
Listen Russian tolls. If you think the US is allowing the F16 to be introduced into theater and have it look bad? Well ask the unfortunate pilots who’ve faced US aircraft, and tactics, face to face which aircraft they’d rather be flying. DONT FORGET THE BODY BAGS
The su 30 SM3 has better equipment than su 35
Can the F16 use the meteor missile? It would go a fair way to level up range. Maybe Ukraine will get some with the new Gripens 😉
Thats basic anwer,SU 35
It's going to depend on the pilot's training and skill.
The pilot training matters a lot.
thats the whole point…avg flite time for Russian pilots, 3hrs /month….compared to US drivers 20hrs plus…its all abt flight time and training…doesnt matter what you’re flying, if you’re behind the power curve , you are toast
How many wars the US has ever won, at least against a formidable opponent like the Russian-Federation?
How did only sandal-clads Talibans on bicycles can chased out the USMC-NATO forces with tails between their legs out of Afghanistan?
Afghans did the same thing to you guys back when you were much bigger or did you seriously not know that lol. You poor Russian sheep Ukraine is destroying your country and they have less than half the army you guys have. Ukraine received handful of our older technology and now you guys are using old scrap from the 50s because you lost most of your better equipment the world is laughing at you.
how many wars did Russians win, they cant even win over less powerful Ukraine )))))) wake up
Nice. Us wins in media only
Сейчас бы истребитель сравнивать с истребителем-бомбардировщиком. АЛОООО 34й это в принципе бомбардировщик, а не истребитель.......лоооооол
Not a good match...it should be F15 S.E/EX vs Su35
Giant turd of a plane, it's a monster compared to an F-16 B72.
No
Yes can...
I western muvie 😂😂😂
f16v would perform better bvr.
Id wager based on recent evemt f16 is far superior or any new us mil tech for that matter.... Ruzzkia losing all type of air assets in large quantity..
Ruzzkia pilot get %50 of flight training hours as us pilots... amd it's inferior training also. Russia is clealry.toast.. is even losing to Ukraine weak air force...
Great production and info! With an AWACs in theater, the F-16 will know where the enemy is even though it cannot detect it with on board radar, then engage at missile range with its own radar. Also, I do not believe that the Russians have anything as good as the AIM-120. In BVR the missile matters as much, if not more, than the plane.
Close in WVR the Viper is probably toast though.
*laughs in R-37 and the longest range recorded air to air kill*
@@ravencookie5141yes and combat proven with tough adversary like Ukraine fighters, R37 world record stand 245km and her distance is 400km not like video say.
Even tho, AIM-120 is great, it isn't like some magic missile that defeats everything, R-77M still outmatches even AIM-120D in range (193km)
AWAC&radars can feed info to Su35 from ground and track f16 aswell
R-37 missle?? Never heard
Wow, absolute ignorance on how this stuff ACTUALLY works. This is mind-numbingly arm-chair quarterbacking at it's worst. Total bush league nonsense.
The answer was 20 years ago answered when the Russians announced their new Su-35, and the answer remains: The F-16 will defeat that plane anytime any day, 100% of the time
What source and what data? a 100 percent fatal engagment with each other for the su-35 is very unlikely.
@polduseri909 Very soon we will find out how everything will really be. After the United States puts its F16s in Ukraine, I'm afraid you will be very disappointed.
The Mig 29 upgraded can match easily the F16 .
muricaaaaaa
Yes .But in war beetwen lndia and Pakistan a Mig21 bison shot down an F16 .Really.
ese terminator ruso es duro en syria lo demostro y en ucrania tambien los f-16 cagados de miedo
😂😂
Su 35 beter
Rafale better
SU-35 ES MEJOR !!
The SU-35 is massively overrated.
And the US planes are not?
@@flanker8724 no
@@coke2679 indian mig-12 shot down f-16 just remember that
10th
The question is how true Russian's spec on its war machines is?
You can ask yourself the same question about American planes
Look at this russian UFO it's the lord of the sky
The F16 has no chance against the SU-35! The F16 would be shot down and not even realize what hit it!
Су-35 не уступит Ф-22/35, а Ф-16 это прошлый век
russian army sucks in general
f 16 is old junk. it is not in the same category whit modern jets like su 35.
Trying everything possible to favor viper hahahaha😂😂😂😂😂😂 lies lies lies
The F16 Viper would win over the cheap russian garbage su 35 is just trash .
Says the guy with 0 experience in the Su-35... lol.
@@phill5917😂😂😂😂