I was present at the 1992 airshow and recall how even the US pilots were impressed by its manoeuvrability. Also present was the Yak-38 v/stol aircraft. It took off vertically once, burnt a huge hole in the runway and then was banned from doing it again 😂
@@jagodiving no actualy the best , the russians invent that stuff ,and it was the russian after all who first build a radar in a jet to find enemys^^ bet u know nothing about russian avionic history
@@QuicksilverVM ok am blind about russian avonic but actually since USSR end in 1991, rusia's military technology develop lower in invention, for exp russia's radar technology stuck in PESA radar while its counterpart like China and US have made matured AESA radar
That specific aircraft was the venerable su34 which I think has an air to ground and air to air radar in it's nose and is also wide because it is a two seater. The su34 is a multirole fighter so it can carry all the missiles of other flanker models, but it is primarily used as a ground attack aircraft. One of my favorites for sure!
Always my go-to for pretty much any flight sim/arcade fighter, the maneuverability and thrust of this was always off the charts compared to others in the game, add in the silly bonus of the best missiles all the time and this fighter is a cheat code in the air theater.
Su 35 is credited with downing about 25 aircraft in ukraine in one month using new 400km R 37 missile designed for su 57 the planes shot down are a mix of su 24/su 27/ su 25/mig 29s donated by Eastern European countries
R37M has a limited range of 150km if used by an SU-35M, since the Irbis-E radar is a quite primitive PESA radar with just 20kw peak output. Only the MIG-31BM with its massive 400kw peak output Zaslon-M radar can THEORETICALLY use the weapon at 400km. 400km is still propaganda since EW and missile steering to hit a target drastically reduces Radar and missile kinetic performance.
R37M has a limited range of 150km if used by an SU-35M, since the Irbis-E radar is a quite primitive PESA radar with just 20kw peak output. Only the MIG-31BM with its massive 400kw peak output Zaslon-M radar can THEORETICALLY use the weapon at 400km. 400km is still propaganda since EW and missile steering to hit a target drastically reduces Radar and missile kinetic performance.Such stupid propaganda numbers. Russia already shot down the entire Ukrainian AF 10 times over, if one believes these russian troll’s numbers. 😂
@@xyzaero Ever heard of AWACS, Air Defense radars,data sharing/data link,ect. and where are then MIG29,SU27,SU24 that they had before 2022. or the aircraft they got donated?! They have few left that's why they are asking for more...same as their AD systems,before 2022. they had around 250 S300 systems not to mention smaller ones,same goes for tanks,armored vehicles,ect. the BURNED through everything.
I don't doubt you but is there any source for Su-35 being credited for 25 kills? I heard Su-30sm has had plenty of success when it comes to pure air superiority.
THE most sexy jet in operation, out there, with no rival. Armed with R37M, the world's best BVR missile (400+km range) is a deadly opponent, able to hunt & kill F15s easily, at a range at least 2x bigger than F15, both in detection range and weapons range.
@@deanboy2416 Hmmm... I would say it's true but on 50% The 37M did hit the targed at 325km away twice (2 Ukrainan aircrafts, but it was SU 57). But the max range of 37M - 380km in theory (not 400+). Plus R-37 was desined for slow targets (tankers, AWACS), not shure that the 37M could hit F15 or F16 that far. Dual stage R-77M way more dangerous for F15/16s. I do not want to see that fights in real, but soon we will see it... 100%.
@@alexeyguskov8153 If it can hit a large slow moving target at 380-400km then it can probably hit a maneuvering fighter at around 250-300km no problem. As for its design I'll say this: it is roughly in the same weight class as the AIM-54 Phoenix, and that missile had no trouble hitting fighter-sized maneuvering targets, so I dont think that the R-37M will have any trouble at all.
@@bekeneel not realy, in 1991or1992 usa invited russians for a simulated dogfight , 2 russian pilots with su27 vs f15 , russians won 8-0 , research it and cry about it. merics were such bad loosers , reporter asked the general how it went and he said it was pretty even, pathetic liars. on the way back su27 were fueled with merican low quality fuel , they almost fell from heaven because they flew to high for that fuel, the russians told the merican jets who escorted em they had emergency and they should call for help when they go down ,the merics ignored em and just left. after a few minutes of free fall the russians could manage to get the engines working again and returned safe at home. USA sucks , they are pathetic liars who live for propaganda. nobody builds better jets than the russians, btw su57 is the only one with 360degree radar , western jets cant find enemys without stationed radars on the ground. and nobody has more training hours than them, also no stealth jet can hide from russian ionic radars who detect electricity . you know s h it welp
According to Commander of Top Gun Academy and all Navy carrier aircraft Scott Snow. He would choose to fly the SU35 in a mission before the F35. He called it the "King of the playground" and said the F35 was unreliable, slow fat and ugly. Have a listen TH-cam - Commander Scott Snow: The Four Front War
In DCS the SU-27 is a beast, only can imagine the real capabilities of SU-35... With the frame and rockets getting better, these boys will be happy to challenge anyone...
@@miteshghadi3146 "the self protection environment" is not in the book of agility but countermeasures. Lets hope for the pilots of the SU-35 the protection suite is better than what was told about the Ka-52. Watching with pleasure what has happened to the Ka-52's when exposed to real life theatre vs. the propaganda information on how invincible its suite should be its just a tragic joke about most Russian equipment, if not all.
@@ChipMIK сам то понял что написал,расскажи про ка 52 прямо интересно,я живу около данного вертолетного завода,а вот тч и насмотрелся своей американской и англосакской пропаганды
@@Sanchezzs73 You wrote what? One one of your other Putlerjugendtroll profiles? I live near a factory making stuff i doesn't know anything about but that doesn't mean i'm an expert on what they make.... What your really saying is: Tell me what you know and i will find something so you can waste a lot of time on finding whether it's tru or not and then you'll give out yet an easy BS answer in a month's time again....Oh boy, you orcs....
At time of this video's release the Flankers hadnt been at the cutting edge of agility or BVR capability for at least 20 years. The F-22, Typhoon, and Gripen e all out classed its capabilities for years. But gods are they beautiful machines.
You should clarify that the "3d thrust vectoring" of the su35 works by having 2 2d nozzles mounted at an angle, the su35 has nozzles that can move 10 degrees from the centerpoint along a single line that due to how they are mounted is canted 32 degrees to the outside
For a long time I thought the Su-35 had canards but now Im learning that Concept 1 has canards, Concept 2 had the current production design with just 3D TVC. They should give it back its canards and improve the radar to an EASA, give it a side joystick and redesignate "Su-37M Terminator II". Su-37 and 47 are my fav aircraft to ever fly, sad that their budgets dried up.
Jets lolling about in the sky at low speed and crazy angles are entertaining at air shows and such. Is there a practical application for such maneuvers? Obviously, some of the same control features can be judiciously used to great effect in real-world situations.
Its good for domestic consumption. Exciting airshow performances create a feeling of competency. But don't underestimate its WVR and BVR capabilities. Its presence will make sure the west will never enjoy air supremacy.
@@jamesharris9816 The Ruskies and their Su-35s can't even achieve air supremacy against a tinpot agrarian shithole right on their own border. God forbid they face NATO, they'll be wiped out.
Could give a pretty significant advantage in dogfights(however its unlikely they'd get into a dogfight in the first place). Depending on the type of pylons used to launch missiles they could get some high offbore sight shots off on target.
@@jamesharris9816 The West will never have air supremacy ... all because of some 100 souped up Flankers? 🤣 Russia does not even have air supremacy over Ukraine AND NOT EVEN OVER RUSSIA. Better habe yourself checked out and do an MRI 👍🏻
Aha, the Indian variants SU 30 MKI is completely made in India with lot of variation is now In Darwin, is part of Pitch Black, I have been to the Air Show. On the open day, man the looks of this engine and attraction it got was wild...
After su 30 mki they made there own same quality fighter know as su35. In 2019 after balakot air strike when Pakistani airforce attacked brigade headquarters at Jammu and Kashmir these su30 mki proved there superiority in air skirmish. Only 2 su 30 mki controlled more than 15-20 Pakistani aircraft..
definitely. J-16 combines a 27's handling with the world's most advanced technology, like if the soviet union was around today with its former economic and technological capabilties.
У китайцев пока слабая школа двигателестроения и не на высоком уровне наука материаловедение, так же и в США слабая наука материаловедение. Так что лучшие истребители будут ещё очень долго в России.
Beautiful bird, among if not the most capable of its time. Unfortunately the need for dogfight features has now been decreased as stealth is taking over. We will only see less and less manouverable jets in the future, mostly compromises for stealth.
THIS "FOURTH GEN" PLUS,PLUS FIGHTER WITH ITS MASSIVE AND POWERFUL RADAR CAN TAKE ON THE F22. THIS IN THE CASE IT HAS A GAN RADAR. IT IS HARD TO BEAT. I AM REFERRING TO THE INDIAN SUPER SUKHIO UPGRADE.
During the early stages of the war the Ukrainian airforce could do little against the the Russian aircraft so they made the wise decision to move there aircraft to western Ukrainian and let the air defenses deal with the Russian aircraft, if they stayed and fought they would have been wiped out, they Russians didn't have air superiority thanks to Ukrainian s300s and manpads but they had air dominace
Comprehensive, circumspect introduction and look into the state of affairs of Russian aviation. Though not an aviation enthusiast I always remember *Carlo Kopp's* 2003 article in *'Australian Aviation'* Magazine about the export of Flankers to Asia and how it stood in performance in contrast to the lockstep of Transatlantic reviews of the platform as nothing but super-maneuverable: 'outright incapable of fighting beyond visual range'...
Australia should have bought these Aircraft instead of the US Products. We also should have simply changed our French Diesel Subs to French Nuclear Subs and saved A$15 BILLION. So much for LABORs Economic ability.
@@exotica550 "Australia should have bought these Aircraft instead of the US Products." To be fair, Russian - or Chinese - military equipment would have locked Australia into Sino-Russian doctrine, culture and politics. With Hugh White, I'd say the only chance of Australia to remain neutral would have been to receive nuclear submarines and nuclear arms - and in consequence to cut all political ties to the US and the Commonwealth - in other words, a coup. From there, a domestic defense industry would have to be set up - which is not exactly trivial (e.g. Australia has no nuclear industry, no aviation industry, no armor industry - solely some experience in submarine production). At this point, all is too late as it would take two generations to get that kind of readiness... Even if Australia would have openly joined China as a guarantor of it's territory, the US would have laid waste to Australian ports like the British did with neutral Denmark during the Napoleonic Wars...
China is the first export user of the Su-35, but the purchase was made not because of the practical needs of the Chinese air force, but because of political concerns. By then China has already put its own 5th Gen fighter J-20 into service, and Chinese derivatives of the Flanker (e.g. the J-16) have avionics that is miles ahead of that of the Su-35.
Yes, I get the feeling the stealth might be a little bit ordinary, but otherwise it's a very competent, airframe. Very agile for such a big bird. Good payload, good range, excellent low-speed high alpha ability. You wouldn't want to get in close & tight against it. I notice it still uses a mechanically steered radar array. That suggests the electronics and avionics are still about 20 years behind what the Americans have got. On the plus side, I wouldn't be all that surprised if the infra-red suite is actually better than what the yanks and NATO have.
@@rajaydon1893 ~ well, I'm not sure that's something I'd be bragging about. The F-16 was designed in 1972 and stealth was never a consideration in the first 20+ years of it's life. '70s planes from America, had twin tails at 90 deg to the airframe. They started to go away from that with the F/A 18. Russian air frames, they're still making them that way. Twin vertical tails is like a deliberately made radar reflector. There are very good reasons for them, in aerodynamics and handling and high alpha and agility, but from a stealth stand-point, that's a nightmare. Now consider the Su-35 again ~ it has a smaller radar cross section than an F16. Ok, good. But that's still like an old metal bookshelf from the local library. Let's make another comparison. Turkey is starting to make a stealth fighter, I can't quite remember the name, but it looks like an F-22 except it has round exhausts, not the rectangular thrust vectoring ones. If you told me it had pretty good stealth as long as it was faced mostly toward you, I'd accept that. Now how does your Su-35 compare to the latest from Turkey? Don't compare it to something that was designed before the fall of Saigon, compare it to something that's in the prototype stage now.
@@Kneedragon1962 это смешно сравнивать реально существующий , состоящий на вооружении в войсках , Воюющий самолет с проектом , вернее с характеристиками проекта реально ничем не подтверждеными . Вы бы еще предложили сравнение с аппаратами из фантастических фильмов =))
@@matt-o-glassmatt7023 ~ Matt, I don't think I'm understanding you correctly. What part of that is sci-fi and fantasy, never tested? Stealth? In a visual range fight, I would back the Su-35 as being the equal of almost anything, but at 20 ~ 40 miles out, that's a different story. You can't fight what you can't see, and you can't beat somebody who can lock you up and launch beyond your detection range. A pilot of an F-22 or an F-35 is never going to get inside 40 miles, because why give up your advantage? It's not meant to be an 'even fight' ~ that's what they're designed for.
With the recent attempted Israeli airstrke on Iran. The superiority of the Russians tech was demonstrated. The Israelis could not penetrate Iranian air space but the Iranians can send hypersonic missiles to Israel and the Americans and the Israelis can not defend against them.
The kingdom of the United States will fall at any moment. The entire Church of Christ will be taken up to The Lord and disappear, it will happen very soon, the Christians are going to disappear. Jesus Christ will come quickly and take away all who believe in Him before the Wrath of the Lord begins. Repent, put your faith in Jesus Christ only, this is the truth, remember this message. Jhon 3:-16-18 16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. Mathew 24:29-31 29 “Immediately after the distress of those days “‘the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’ 30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. 31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other. This is certain and will happen at any time. But those who have not received Jesus Christ nor repented of their sins will remain on earth and will receive each and every one of the plagues that our Eternal Father has prepared for this moment. There will be 7 years of Wrath on the earth, resist until the end, put your faith in Jesus Christ and you will save your soul. Revelation 13:16-17 16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads, 17 that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name. Revelation14:9-10 9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead or in his hand, 10 the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out unmixed into the cup of His indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. Do NOT take the mark of the beast , there is no coming back from it. 2Tessalonians 2:7-12 7 For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. 9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, 10 and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness. DO NOT BELIEVE ON THOSE THINGS YOU SEE ON TV AND THOSE (UFO 🛸 objects), THOSE THINGS ARE PART OF THE GREAT DELUSION, DO NOT BELIEVE ON WHAT THEY COME UP WITH SAYING ABOUT IT. PUT YOUR FAITH AND TRUST IN JESUS CHRIST ONLY, THE CHURCH IS ABOUT TO GO HOME AND WHOEVER TELLS THE LIE WILL MOST LIKELY BLAME THOSE THINGS FOR OUR DISAPPEARANCE. I have warned you ahead of time. BE READY! May our Heavenly Father GOD keep you and your family safe, in Jesus' name. Amen.
My gosh!!! F 35 have many drawbacks,just for like n subscriber ...every channel about aviation has been set up...yeah!! I like f 35 but remember its vtol,stol technology have bought it by Lockheed martin after the collapse of soviet union...yak 144 ...lets look about f 35 vs su 75 check mate ,its the russian strategy to defeat f 35 n : 22
Why did you not mention that the Russian are updating them with AI there was a report around 2018 that they have been updating them with a AI modula aka R2D2
Ukraine has lost about 400 airplanes and on fighter bomber channel they claim that about half was shot down by su 35 versions and a few by mig 31 with long range radar missles. Ukraine airforce was terrible bad but also they had very bad short range missles againt russian long range stuff. To bad the F16 also will have bad short rtange versions of amrams. Having short range missles in 2024 is like flying an slow airplane in ww2.
I have heard on Russian TV that F35 was constructed according to the drawings of Soviet Yak-141, sold to Americans by aome traitor in 1990s. But Yak-141 was not finished project and therefore F35 had some serious problems in its design.
1) there was no traitor lmao. “Yakovlev announced that they had reached an agreement with Lockheed for funds of $385 to $400 million for three new prototypes and an additional static test aircraft to test improvements in design and avionics.” Gunston, William 'Bill'; Gordon, Yefim (1997). Yakovlev Aircraft since 1924. London, UK: Putnam Aeronautical Books. ISBN 978-1-55750-978-9. 2) Lockheed and the Brits looked at the 3 engine layout with 2 additional canted turbojets, laughed, and said we could do better. Fat Amy has a single Pratt and Whitney engine with thrust vectoring nozzle and a massive rolls Royce lift fan behind the cockpit (thought it isn’t used in flight). So no, not anywhere near the same design, but it’s cool that there was an information exchange. Kind of a shame relations fell apart.
@@accountantthe3394 you’re kidding right ? Haven’t you seen the numerous issues china has had with these engines vs proven Russian AL-41F-1S engines? New radar & avionics …. I think they’re gonna be fine
@@imepriimek398 2 fighters were shot down. This information was from the news of NATO countries as well. Ukraine confirmed the loss of two aircraft. But we cannot know for sure what exactly shot them down; perhaps it was the S400 or S350 air defense. Su-35 fighter missiles are used against AWACS; it is unlikely that they can shoot down a fighter because it is too maneuverable a target. For fighters, medium-range missiles are used.
@@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я "This information was from the news of NATO countries as well. " Can you please tell me what do you mean with "news of NATO countries"?? You obviously dont know how democracy works.. EVERYBODY can post news here.
definitely the prettiest fighter jet ever made
watch F22. And F22 would kill su35 in the sky ;:) it's old tech.
@@bekeneel lol f22 can't even kill a balloon
этот самолет..минимум 50 лет обогнал время.....
@@bekeneel F-22 was discontinuied.
F-22 has never been in aerial combat and never will be.
I was present at the 1992 airshow and recall how even the US pilots were impressed by its manoeuvrability. Also present was the Yak-38 v/stol aircraft. It took off vertically once, burnt a huge hole in the runway and then was banned from doing it again 😂
That was badass. Where can I learn more about that Yak-38 incident.
awesome in maneuvers but weak in term of avionic and radar
@@jagodiving no actualy the best , the russians invent that stuff ,and it was the russian after all who first build a radar in a jet to find enemys^^ bet u know nothing about russian avionic history
@@QuicksilverVM ok am blind about russian avonic but actually since USSR end in 1991, rusia's military technology develop lower in invention, for exp russia's radar technology stuck in PESA radar while its counterpart like China and US have made matured AESA radar
@@jagodiving weak in avionics? you are delusional.
Beautiful aircraft. Absolutely stunning.
The flankers are the most beautiful combat ever to fly, the silhouette is just beautiful in any variant.
One of the most beautiful aircraft ever created.
Flankers are flying masterpieces. The su47 berkut is my favorite jet of all time.
Same. 47 looks absolutly amazing.
SU35 is the best looking jet ever built but the SU47 is ugly AF
What about flying backwards?
This jet make ballet in sky !
Very very beautiful plane. Especially from the front. It looks soooooo mean.
The radar on the Su 35 must be massive, that nose radome at 6:31 is huge. A very beautiful aircraft and a fierce 4+ jet no doubt.
That specific aircraft was the venerable su34 which I think has an air to ground and air to air radar in it's nose and is also wide because it is a two seater. The su34 is a multirole fighter so it can carry all the missiles of other flanker models, but it is primarily used as a ground attack aircraft. One of my favorites for sure!
It is indeed a beautiful aircraft
@@pyrotection Unusual seeing it in black paint
Он 4++
Holy crap...look at the moves that the plane can make....
Always my go-to for pretty much any flight sim/arcade fighter, the maneuverability and thrust of this was always off the charts compared to others in the game, add in the silly bonus of the best missiles all the time and this fighter is a cheat code in the air theater.
A remarkable aircraft this is
Su 35 is credited with downing about 25 aircraft in ukraine in one month using new 400km R 37 missile designed for su 57 the planes shot down are a mix of su 24/su 27/ su 25/mig 29s donated by Eastern European countries
R37M has a limited range of 150km if used by an SU-35M, since the Irbis-E radar is a quite primitive PESA
radar with just 20kw peak output. Only the MIG-31BM with its massive 400kw peak output Zaslon-M radar can THEORETICALLY use the weapon at 400km. 400km is still propaganda since EW and missile steering to hit a target drastically reduces Radar and missile kinetic performance.
R37M has a limited range of 150km if used by an SU-35M, since the Irbis-E radar is a quite primitive PESA
radar with just 20kw peak output. Only the MIG-31BM with its massive 400kw peak output Zaslon-M radar can THEORETICALLY use the weapon at 400km. 400km is still propaganda since EW and missile steering to hit a target drastically reduces Radar and missile kinetic performance.Such stupid propaganda numbers. Russia already shot down the entire Ukrainian AF 10 times over, if one believes these russian troll’s numbers. 😂
@@xyzaero Ever heard of AWACS, Air Defense radars,data sharing/data link,ect. and where are then MIG29,SU27,SU24 that they had before 2022. or the aircraft they got donated?! They have few left that's why they are asking for more...same as their AD systems,before 2022. they had around 250 S300 systems not to mention smaller ones,same goes for tanks,armored vehicles,ect. the BURNED through everything.
@@aleksandarzoric2452 They had to 'burn through' ammunition, etc. How else do you stop the Mighty Orc Rabble?
I don't doubt you but is there any source for Su-35 being credited for 25 kills? I heard Su-30sm has had plenty of success when it comes to pure air superiority.
THE most sexy jet in operation, out there, with no rival. Armed with R37M, the world's best BVR missile (400+km range) is a deadly opponent, able to hunt & kill F15s easily, at a range at least 2x bigger than F15, both in detection range and weapons range.
Got any sources for the 'double' claim?
@@francodimitsy989 just search it up
@@francodimitsy989 check max engagement ranges of the AIM-120C-7 and the R-37M.
@@deanboy2416 Hmmm... I would say it's true but on 50% The 37M did hit the targed at 325km away twice (2 Ukrainan aircrafts, but it was SU 57). But the max range of 37M - 380km in theory (not 400+). Plus R-37 was desined for slow targets (tankers, AWACS), not shure that the 37M could hit F15 or F16 that far. Dual stage R-77M way more dangerous for F15/16s. I do not want to see that fights in real, but soon we will see it... 100%.
@@alexeyguskov8153 If it can hit a large slow moving target at 380-400km then it can probably hit a maneuvering fighter at around 250-300km no problem.
As for its design I'll say this: it is roughly in the same weight class as the AIM-54 Phoenix, and that missile had no trouble hitting fighter-sized maneuvering targets, so I dont think that the R-37M will have any trouble at all.
SU 35 S / SM = Super killer.. beautiful killer.. ☝️👍👏👏👏
Not against the western counterparts :) that have 1. superior & more training hours 2. stealth 3. better radars.
@@bekeneel not realy, in 1991or1992 usa invited russians for a simulated dogfight , 2 russian pilots with su27 vs f15 , russians won 8-0 , research it and cry about it. merics were such bad loosers , reporter asked the general how it went and he said it was pretty even, pathetic liars. on the way back su27 were fueled with merican low quality fuel , they almost fell from heaven because they flew to high for that fuel, the russians told the merican jets who escorted em they had emergency and they should call for help when they go down ,the merics ignored em and just left. after a few minutes of free fall the russians could manage to get the engines working again and returned safe at home. USA sucks , they are pathetic liars who live for propaganda. nobody builds better jets than the russians, btw su57 is the only one with 360degree radar , western jets cant find enemys without stationed radars on the ground. and nobody has more training hours than them, also no stealth jet can hide from russian ionic radars who detect electricity . you know s h it welp
@@bekeneelЭто вам кто предоставил информацию? 35с видит f22 на большом расстоянии. Был пример в Сирии.
@@Ильнур-ы1е 🤣 So u claim that a non-stealth jet saw another fully stealth jet, first?
А такой разве существует? 🤣
Хватит уже Голливуд смотреть
According to Commander of Top Gun Academy and all Navy carrier aircraft Scott Snow. He would choose to fly the SU35 in a mission before the F35. He called it the "King of the playground" and said the F35 was unreliable, slow fat and ugly. Have a listen TH-cam - Commander Scott Snow: The Four Front War
When the form and function meet.
outstanding. and truly objective. thank you for not letting the desire for one nation or another to win influence your reporting of the facts.
Got to agree:it looks so good.
That's one sexy aircraft.
It's a beauty for sure
The narrator's voice makes flanker ever more sexier!
Beautiful...well beyond anything else.
God that plane is beautiful
Thanks for the just the facts analysis
What a great plane. 👍👍
Absolutly great footage.🤙🏻👍🏻
In DCS the SU-27 is a beast, only can imagine the real capabilities of SU-35... With the frame and rockets getting better, these boys will be happy to challenge anyone...
Beside the RCS is an utter joke and clearly the self protection environment of Russian planes are super overhyped when challenged IRL.
@@ChipMIK su 35 is great 4.5 gen fighterjet . no aircraft has this much agility can dodge missile
@@miteshghadi3146 "the self protection environment" is not in the book of agility but countermeasures. Lets hope for the pilots of the SU-35 the protection suite is better than what was told about the Ka-52. Watching with pleasure what has happened to the Ka-52's when exposed to real life theatre vs. the propaganda information on how invincible its suite should be its just a tragic joke about most Russian equipment, if not all.
@@ChipMIK сам то понял что написал,расскажи про ка 52 прямо интересно,я живу около данного вертолетного завода,а вот тч и насмотрелся своей американской и англосакской пропаганды
@@Sanchezzs73 You wrote what? One one of your other Putlerjugendtroll profiles? I live near a factory making stuff i doesn't know anything about but that doesn't mean i'm an expert on what they make....
What your really saying is: Tell me what you know and i will find something so you can waste a lot of time on finding whether it's tru or not and then you'll give out yet an easy BS answer in a month's time again....Oh boy, you orcs....
This seems like a good unbiased channel.
At time of this video's release the Flankers hadnt been at the cutting edge of agility or BVR capability for at least 20 years. The F-22, Typhoon, and Gripen e all out classed its capabilities for years. But gods are they beautiful machines.
f22 is the coolest looking jet i have ever seen, flanker is the prettiest, most elegant one
You should clarify that the "3d thrust vectoring" of the su35 works by having 2 2d nozzles mounted at an angle, the su35 has nozzles that can move 10 degrees from the centerpoint along a single line that due to how they are mounted is canted 32 degrees to the outside
For a long time I thought the Su-35 had canards but now Im learning that Concept 1 has canards, Concept 2 had the current production design with just 3D TVC. They should give it back its canards and improve the radar to an EASA, give it a side joystick and redesignate "Su-37M Terminator II". Su-37 and 47 are my fav aircraft to ever fly, sad that their budgets dried up.
SU-30SM2 is it, with the front tail, new radar and SU-35 engine.
the best 4++ fighter in the world
@@dindrmindr626 It's an opinion that they're entitled to! God...
@@alfredmakaveli6622 erm..no. That would be the Rafale. Trust me
@@randompalmtopgaming7541 everyone has their favourite. i dont think a rafale can outrun a patriot missile. su34 did. 3 of them.
@@alfredmakaveli6622 Where? In Bryansk?
@@vp6087 your mum house
What a beautiful bird
Awesomely compiled good work
Such a gorgeous thing
Yeah, this amazing aircraft will be around for many years to come.
I love the f22 but i have to say Su 35 is beautiful
Jets lolling about in the sky at low speed and crazy angles are entertaining at air shows and such. Is there a practical application for such maneuvers? Obviously, some of the same control features can be judiciously used to great effect in real-world situations.
Its good for domestic consumption. Exciting airshow performances create a feeling of competency. But don't underestimate its WVR and BVR capabilities. Its presence will make sure the west will never enjoy air supremacy.
@@jamesharris9816 The Ruskies and their Su-35s can't even achieve air supremacy against a tinpot agrarian shithole right on their own border. God forbid they face NATO, they'll be wiped out.
Could give a pretty significant advantage in dogfights(however its unlikely they'd get into a dogfight in the first place). Depending on the type of pylons used to launch missiles they could get some high offbore sight shots off on target.
@@jamesharris9816 The West will never have air supremacy ... all because of some 100 souped up Flankers? 🤣
Russia does not even have air supremacy over Ukraine AND NOT EVEN OVER RUSSIA. Better habe yourself checked out and do an MRI 👍🏻
@@jamesharris9816It's outdated.
Aha, the Indian variants SU 30 MKI is completely made in India with lot of variation is now In Darwin, is part of Pitch Black, I have been to the Air Show. On the open day, man the looks of this engine and attraction it got was wild...
Pułap condora, majestat orła, wola walki i prędkość sokoła!
Your videos are so well made, you should really have your own show
Beautiful aircraft
Interesting technology
The voice warning system going off in the background lol
You should go into the derivatives of the flanker airframes. Like the ones used in China like the J11's and 16's for their airforce.
Thrust vectoring is AWSOME . We in the Us Still have a major advantage with the RADAR SYSTEM IN THE F 22 RAPTOR
Look at it's tale 😂
My favorite ace combat 7 jet!
Hermoso ❤
Interesting. And nice music at the end!
😉its echoes of eternity tell sonic
Who says the enemy can fairly describe a rival plane. NO ONE.
What music track at the beggining of video is used?
Looks good.
Fly good.
Kills good.
The FLANKER..what else ?
After su 30 mki they made there own same quality fighter know as su35. In 2019 after balakot air strike when Pakistani airforce attacked brigade headquarters at Jammu and Kashmir these su30 mki proved there superiority in air skirmish. Only 2 su 30 mki controlled more than 15-20 Pakistani aircraft..
Man who said, if it looks like it can fly,means that it can!
what song is at the end?
Echoes of Eternity
@@harishadrovic6465 thank you
Echoes of Eternity
Tellsonic
Gorgeous...
i would say the ultimate flanker would be China's J16
definitely. J-16 combines a 27's handling with the world's most advanced technology, like if the soviet union was around today with its former economic and technological capabilties.
У китайцев пока слабая школа двигателестроения и не на высоком уровне наука материаловедение, так же и в США слабая наука материаловедение. Так что лучшие истребители будут ещё очень долго в России.
你是认真的？😂中国的ws10c发动机已经基本可以媲美al41了，发动机寿命也很强悍，更不用说我们有更先进的ws15，推重比达到f119的水平，已经至少列装了五十架歼二十战斗机，剩下的发动机也会逐步替换，至于材料学，你真的觉得你们苏57的难产和我们歼二十的量产是你们材料学优于我们的证明吗😂
Freaking oh MY!!!!!!😮. Sounds better then the super hornet
Beautiful bird, among if not the most capable of its time. Unfortunately the need for dogfight features has now been decreased as stealth is taking over. We will only see less and less manouverable jets in the future, mostly compromises for stealth.
THIS "FOURTH GEN" PLUS,PLUS FIGHTER WITH ITS MASSIVE AND POWERFUL RADAR CAN TAKE ON THE F22. THIS IN THE CASE IT HAS A GAN RADAR. IT IS HARD TO BEAT. I AM REFERRING TO THE INDIAN SUPER SUKHIO UPGRADE.
indians and french competing to see who can be the most delusional with their fighters.
The grandson of SU-27.....Long live Russia
"Air Supremacy early in the war" (10:06)... When did that happen? Did I miss sonmething?
Refer to RUSI's report by Justin Bronk during the early days of the war.
During the early stages of the war the Ukrainian airforce could do little against the the Russian aircraft so they made the wise decision to move there aircraft to western Ukrainian and let the air defenses deal with the Russian aircraft, if they stayed and fought they would have been wiped out, they Russians didn't have air superiority thanks to Ukrainian s300s and manpads but they had air dominace
You did indeed but I am sure didnt miss out the ghost of kiev bullshit which didnt exist and was created to boost morale.
Right before Zelensky agreed to hold peace talks in Istanbul
yes you must listen to CNN
best ever
Comprehensive, circumspect introduction and look into the state of affairs of Russian aviation.
Though not an aviation enthusiast I always remember *Carlo Kopp's* 2003 article in *'Australian Aviation'* Magazine about the export of Flankers to Asia and how it stood in performance in contrast to the lockstep of Transatlantic reviews of the platform as nothing but super-maneuverable: 'outright incapable of fighting beyond visual range'...
Australia should have bought these Aircraft instead of the US Products. We also should have simply changed our French Diesel Subs to French Nuclear Subs and saved A$15 BILLION. So much for LABORs Economic ability.
@@exotica550
"Australia should have bought these Aircraft instead of the US Products."
To be fair, Russian - or Chinese - military equipment would have locked Australia into Sino-Russian doctrine, culture and politics.
With Hugh White, I'd say the only chance of Australia to remain neutral would have been to receive nuclear submarines and nuclear arms - and in consequence to cut all political ties to the US and the Commonwealth - in other words, a coup.
From there, a domestic defense industry would have to be set up - which is not exactly trivial (e.g. Australia has no nuclear industry, no aviation industry, no armor industry - solely some experience in submarine production).
At this point, all is too late as it would take two generations to get that kind of readiness...
Even if Australia would have openly joined China as a guarantor of it's territory, the US would have laid waste to Australian ports like the British did with neutral Denmark during the Napoleonic Wars...
China is the first export user of the Su-35, but the purchase was made not because of the practical needs of the Chinese air force, but because of political concerns. By then China has already put its own 5th Gen fighter J-20 into service, and Chinese derivatives of the Flanker (e.g. the J-16) have avionics that is miles ahead of that of the Su-35.
@@WChocoleta ha ha, vety fun about avionics 🤣🙃
Nothing but the best of course made in Russia .
🕊️🕊️🕊️🇷🇺🕊️🕊️🕊️
Is this DCS footage ? If so, please give credit !
Yes, I get the feeling the stealth might be a little bit ordinary, but otherwise it's a very competent, airframe. Very agile for such a big bird. Good payload, good range, excellent low-speed high alpha ability. You wouldn't want to get in close & tight against it.
I notice it still uses a mechanically steered radar array. That suggests the electronics and avionics are still about 20 years behind what the Americans have got. On the plus side, I wouldn't be all that surprised if the infra-red suite is actually better than what the yanks and NATO have.
The latest variation of the su35 has an rcs less than the f16
@@rajaydon1893 ~ well, I'm not sure that's something I'd be bragging about. The F-16 was designed in 1972 and stealth was never a consideration in the first 20+ years of it's life.
'70s planes from America, had twin tails at 90 deg to the airframe. They started to go away from that with the F/A 18. Russian air frames, they're still making them that way. Twin vertical tails is like a deliberately made radar reflector. There are very good reasons for them, in aerodynamics and handling and high alpha and agility, but from a stealth stand-point, that's a nightmare.
Now consider the Su-35 again ~ it has a smaller radar cross section than an F16. Ok, good. But that's still like an old metal bookshelf from the local library.
Let's make another comparison. Turkey is starting to make a stealth fighter, I can't quite remember the name, but it looks like an F-22 except it has round exhausts, not the rectangular thrust vectoring ones. If you told me it had pretty good stealth as long as it was faced mostly toward you, I'd accept that. Now how does your Su-35 compare to the latest from Turkey? Don't compare it to something that was designed before the fall of Saigon, compare it to something that's in the prototype stage now.
They have new aesa radars which haven't been shown to public ofcourse, pulling numbers straight out your ass
@@Kneedragon1962 это смешно сравнивать реально существующий , состоящий на вооружении в войсках , Воюющий самолет с проектом , вернее с характеристиками проекта реально ничем не подтверждеными . Вы бы еще предложили сравнение с аппаратами из фантастических фильмов =))
@@matt-o-glassmatt7023 ~ Matt, I don't think I'm understanding you correctly. What part of that is sci-fi and fantasy, never tested? Stealth?
In a visual range fight, I would back the Su-35 as being the equal of almost anything, but at 20 ~ 40 miles out, that's a different story. You can't fight what you can't see, and you can't beat somebody who can lock you up and launch beyond your detection range.
A pilot of an F-22 or an F-35 is never going to get inside 40 miles, because why give up your advantage? It's not meant to be an 'even fight' ~ that's what they're designed for.
It's truly astonishing what this beauty does in the sky.
BRAVO RUSSIA AND CHINA SAVIOUR OF THE WORLD CAN LEAD AND BRING STABILITY AND BALLANCE OF POWER OF THE WORLD TO STOP HYPOCRACY AND WARMONGERING MINDSET
Imagine if it would get Su-57's new engines...
It is the best non stealth fighter ever built .
I thought the ultimate Flanker is J16 / J11 series? Basically Flankers with composite airframe and modern electronics.
@@henryorcustus3412 35 is a killer beast
If pretty was a plane, it would be this.
Az OROSZOK nagyon tudnak repűlni. Bár csak látnék egy amarikai géppel egy csatát. Mondjuk egy F 35 öst leszedne.
Why have I never seen any Western fighter plane do those types of aerobatics?
They can and do lmao, go to any airshow with an F-22. Hell even Fat Amy can do the falling leaf maneuver.
With the recent attempted Israeli airstrke on Iran. The superiority of the Russians tech was demonstrated. The Israelis could not penetrate Iranian air space but the Iranians can send hypersonic missiles to Israel and the Americans and the Israelis can not defend against them.
i LOVE THESE AIRSHOWKING.........but in a real battle i prefer Gripen, Eurofighter or F 22
The kingdom of the United States will fall at any moment. The entire Church of Christ will be taken up to The Lord and disappear, it will happen very soon, the Christians are going to disappear. Jesus Christ will come quickly and take away all who believe in Him before the Wrath of the Lord begins. Repent, put your faith in Jesus Christ only, this is the truth, remember this message.
Jhon 3:-16-18
16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.
18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.
Mathew 24:29-31
29 “Immediately after the distress of those days
“‘the sun will be darkened,
and the moon will not give its light;
the stars will fall from the sky,
and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’
30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.
31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.
This is certain and will happen at any time. But those who have not received Jesus Christ nor repented of their sins will remain on earth and will receive each and every one of the plagues that our Eternal Father has prepared for this moment. There will be 7 years of Wrath on the earth, resist until the end, put your faith in Jesus Christ and you will save your soul.
Revelation 13:16-17
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads,
17 that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Revelation14:9-10
9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead or in his hand,
10 the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out unmixed into the cup of His indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.
Do NOT take the mark of the beast , there is no coming back from it.
2Tessalonians 2:7-12
7 For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way.
8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming.
9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie,
10 and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.
11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie
12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.
DO NOT BELIEVE ON THOSE THINGS YOU SEE ON TV AND THOSE (UFO 🛸 objects), THOSE THINGS ARE PART OF THE GREAT DELUSION, DO NOT BELIEVE ON WHAT THEY COME UP WITH SAYING ABOUT IT.
PUT YOUR FAITH AND TRUST IN JESUS CHRIST ONLY, THE CHURCH IS ABOUT TO GO HOME AND WHOEVER TELLS THE LIE WILL MOST LIKELY BLAME THOSE THINGS FOR OUR DISAPPEARANCE.
I have warned you ahead of time.
BE READY! May our Heavenly Father GOD keep you and your family safe, in Jesus' name. Amen.
I prefer f-35
Why?
@@flxgreen6346 ich möchte überleben
My gosh!!! F 35 have many drawbacks,just for like n subscriber ...every channel about aviation has been set up...yeah!! I like f 35 but remember its vtol,stol technology have bought it by Lockheed martin after the collapse of soviet union...yak 144 ...lets look about f 35 vs su 75 check mate ,its the russian strategy to defeat f 35 n : 22
Russian military is so far ahead in technology
Art in flight.
Erbis i is not a pesa is an aesa radar
The DCS clips used in this lol
Why did you not mention that the Russian are updating them with AI there was a report around 2018 that they have been updating them with a AI modula aka R2D2
No More Flat Spin stallouts
Ukraine has lost about 400 airplanes and on fighter bomber channel they claim that about half was shot down by su 35 versions and a few by mig 31 with long range radar missles. Ukraine airforce was terrible bad but also they had very bad short range missles againt russian long range stuff. To bad the F16 also will have bad short rtange versions of amrams. Having short range missles in 2024 is like flying an slow airplane in ww2.
what?!?!?!?! Ukraine never had that many aircraft to beggin with .... what are you taling about!!!
I have heard on Russian TV that F35 was constructed according to the drawings of Soviet Yak-141, sold to Americans by aome traitor in 1990s.
But Yak-141 was not finished project and therefore F35 had some serious problems in its design.
Lockheed bought the VTOL from Yak141!
1) there was no traitor lmao. “Yakovlev announced that they had reached an agreement with Lockheed for funds of $385 to $400 million for three new prototypes and an additional static test aircraft to test improvements in design and avionics.”
Gunston, William 'Bill'; Gordon, Yefim (1997). Yakovlev Aircraft since 1924. London, UK: Putnam Aeronautical Books. ISBN 978-1-55750-978-9.
2) Lockheed and the Brits looked at the 3 engine layout with 2 additional canted turbojets, laughed, and said we could do better. Fat Amy has a single Pratt and Whitney engine with thrust vectoring nozzle and a massive rolls Royce lift fan behind the cockpit (thought it isn’t used in flight). So no, not anywhere near the same design, but it’s cool that there was an information exchange. Kind of a shame relations fell apart.
its my all time favorite jet but the only thing it really lacks is an AESA radar
People don't get how big this bird is! Something that huge shouldn't be able to fly like that!
The Russian plane looks in flight as if I was playing with a toy plane as a child🫣
Not so sure about "ultimate Flanker", I'd bet the Su-30MKI or J-16 would be more advanced.
The Su-30mki uses a weaker radar and engines that aren't as good as the Su-35. The J-16 though, does have better avionics but worse engines.
@@voidtempering8700 won’t matter as the mki ‘s are going through a upgrade project with new radar & engines etc
@@mod3353If you're counting upgrades, then J16 with WS-10 engines would still be far better than Indian MK-Is
@@accountantthe3394 you’re kidding right ? Haven’t you seen the numerous issues china has had with these engines vs proven Russian AL-41F-1S engines? New radar & avionics …. I think they’re gonna be fine
@@mod3353 No really I'm not lol What issues/crashes have there been in recent years? You realise PLAAF just tested their WS-15 engine?
@8:06 How do you know that these missiles hit ukranian plane over 100km away?? Where is the proof??
This summer. Launch range 213 km. A MiG-29 was shot down
@@alext5285 and the proof for that is where? Russia says?! ROFL
@@imepriimek398 2 fighters were shot down. This information was from the news of NATO countries as well. Ukraine confirmed the loss of two aircraft. But we cannot know for sure what exactly shot them down; perhaps it was the S400 or S350 air defense. Su-35 fighter missiles are used against AWACS; it is unlikely that they can shoot down a fighter because it is too maneuverable a target. For fighters, medium-range missiles are used.
@@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я "This information was from the news of NATO countries as well. " Can you please tell me what do you mean with "news of NATO countries"?? You obviously dont know how democracy works.. EVERYBODY can post news here.
@@imepriimek398 go publish information about the fact that the war in Ukraine is sponsored by .... I want to look at this.
Sexiest jet fighter ever made.
Awesome machine
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
So the worse Typhoon, 20 years later?
🧌 don't belong in aviation content
Russia hyperfans from indonesia's top idol 😂😂😂
Are you being stupid on purpose or does it take effort?
И опять намеренно заниженные характеристики. Каждый раз. Для чего? СУ 35 единовременно может отслеживать до 30 целей и атаковать 8 из них.