Looks nice. Thanks for the video. I appreciate the FWD as it should be better in winter and other slippery conditions. Also, as you say - no turbo, yay!
I'd put shelves and a tiny wall and composting toilet and deliver packages and mail if I can get one of these in right handed drive or a conversion kit for right handed drive.
I have a promaster 2500/2024. I don't like the brakes, when you are driving and braking for the first time the pedal goes to the bottom, you have to pump, something that an emergency of hundredths of a second is mediocre, since you have to pump to achieve optimal braking, I was a few days after releasing this van and they only limited themselves to telling me that the brakes are like that. If I die or have an accident caused by the brakes, I swear I will sue rigorously. Don't buy or let yourself be pressured, try the vehicle and say what you don't think.
Do they feel underpowered at all? I'm looking at those and I feel like the engine is weak for an 85k van. What things do you like about it? Genuinely asking as it's a potential candidate for me.
It’s a diesel so you have to let boost build a lot longer and depending on load you can use momentum isn’t fast by any means but hauls nicely my 2.0 diesel get 21-22 mpg highway no problems as of now
Far more comfortable than the Ford. Only issue I had was the driver side mirror blocked by the window pillar. Seems to have been somehwat fixed for 2024
Haha that's the tale across all the makes, chevy, ford, etc., cargo vans are always thousands more than their fullsize counterparts, with half the towing and a fraction of the interior tech (they're just starting to get screens, the chevy express's still don't, they have head units from the 1990s lmao, half the time they don't come with bluetooth). They start at mid 40k barebones and the second you add anything they shoot up to 50k minimum. Too much tech is bad of course, but you're paying luxury prices for something that hasn't changed in 20 years because car companies know people buy cargo vans because we have to. You buy em EXCLUSIVELY because you have a solid business that its for, that you can't get a pick up for, and that you know you'll get your money back with.
Complete garbage. Worst van in production. Our company has 12 of them, 3 blew the transmissions before 40k, two others at 60k. Cruise control never holds speed, they are bloody awful on the wind, the drivers seat position is the dumbest least comfortable of all the vans. It’s a horrible van
52k is not cheap
You might like the 4.3 or 6.6 with the 8 speed if you try it from the express
Wished it was four wheel drive
wish it was rear wheel drive instead of front wheel drive
Looks nice. Thanks for the video. I appreciate the FWD as it should be better in winter and other slippery conditions. Also, as you say - no turbo, yay!
I'd put shelves and a tiny wall and composting toilet and deliver packages and mail if I can get one of these in right handed drive or a conversion kit for right handed drive.
Yeah, but I think this looks better than the mercedes benz sprinter limo
Im 5’5”.. when i sit in the driver seat i can hardly see under the visor.. terrible seats and terrible steering wheel adjustments
Transits are just as bad as a 6.2 driver.
I have a promaster 2500/2024. I don't like the brakes, when you are driving and braking for the first time the pedal goes to the bottom, you have to pump, something that an emergency of hundredths of a second is mediocre, since you have to pump to achieve optimal braking, I was a few days after releasing this van and they only limited themselves to telling me that the brakes are like that. If I die or have an accident caused by the brakes, I swear I will sue rigorously. Don't buy or let yourself be pressured, try the vehicle and say what you don't think.
Brakes aren't working properly . Still under warranty? I would not drive it.
I own 5 Mercedes sprinter diesels
I have no complaints at all. They are really expensive but worth every penny.
Do they feel underpowered at all? I'm looking at those and I feel like the engine is weak for an 85k van. What things do you like about it? Genuinely asking as it's a potential candidate for me.
It’s a diesel so you have to let boost build a lot longer and depending on load you can use momentum isn’t fast by any means but hauls nicely my 2.0 diesel get 21-22 mpg highway no problems as of now
@@kamilkubaj42862.0 is pathetically tiny
A 9 speed transmission that never goes over the 7 speed, never... 2023 owner.
They're locked out because that's simply too high of a gear ratio for the size of this van.
@@christopherhaak9824 Really?
A cargo van review without the cargo measurements…!!! I’m sorry, but not useful
Its good until you have to do tune up and access those plugs and coil in the bank behind
Amazon uses these!
Overpriced for what it is. What are the specs?
Far more comfortable than the Ford.
Only issue I had was the driver side mirror blocked by the window pillar. Seems to have been somehwat fixed for 2024
Hello what is the different 2500 and 3500
I am pretty sure it's frame and suspension for heavier cargo/ towing capacity. i do not know if thats all.
@@Qcnordique 3500 is the extended length cargo area, 13foot cargo length instead of 12 foot.
@@kruse1105 i was quite happy when i got mine and realized this. i got an extra foot i didn't expect to have.
3500 has dual rear wheels.
My work truck is the Ford Transit and it’s 2 wheel drive! Pretty ridiculous being I live in Syracuse 🤬
Good working van love it
I didn’t know they offered a 9 speed. What other Stellantis vehicles have that?
2024 Ram ProMaster 1500 High Roof 136 Wheelbase Cargo Van!
🤷♂️
52 k I’ll get a comfy midsize with a closed trailer not this :(
Haha that's the tale across all the makes, chevy, ford, etc., cargo vans are always thousands more than their fullsize counterparts, with half the towing and a fraction of the interior tech (they're just starting to get screens, the chevy express's still don't, they have head units from the 1990s lmao, half the time they don't come with bluetooth). They start at mid 40k barebones and the second you add anything they shoot up to 50k minimum. Too much tech is bad of course, but you're paying luxury prices for something that hasn't changed in 20 years because car companies know people buy cargo vans because we have to.
You buy em EXCLUSIVELY because you have a solid business that its for, that you can't get a pick up for, and that you know you'll get your money back with.
6651 Kenna Ridge
14426 O'Hara Ridges
297 Gerry Falls
Mossie Common
THIS IS FIAT DUCATO
It is a Peugeot Boxer with make up to seem american.
Complete garbage. Worst van in production. Our company has 12 of them, 3 blew the transmissions before 40k, two others at 60k. Cruise control never holds speed, they are bloody awful on the wind, the drivers seat position is the dumbest least comfortable of all the vans. It’s a horrible van
Bro, Slow Down!!!!!!
52k?? Man stellantis is ruining ram, please sell ram, dodge and jeep!! (Chrysler is already dead)
You’ll replace your transmission at least five times before it hits 100,000 miles 😂
👎👎👎👎
Do not get close to this van.
Worse transmissions in the game
Why would you need nearly 300hp in a little work van??!!
Williams Ruth Martin Frank Williams Carol