14:17 for the ADHD MFs among you. I was also saying that the APNVG looks slightly auburn, I meant to say olive. The housing gives it a slight pale greenish-blue hue vs the solid blue hue of the DTNVS. That is from the lenses on the housing and not the intensifier tubes themselves. It seems to allow for a more detailed image although that is also likely a culmination of all the high quality specs combined.
Can't believe this video doesn't have a ton of views. As a former PVS-14 to ANVIS-9 to J-31 user, this is really freaking cool to know what it's like to see as an end user.
quads by far. you wont really notice a huge difference between 2200s and 3200s honestly.. in this video you see the difference between 1800 and 2400 and its not crazy but dual to quads is MASSIVE
In order to fly with night vision per FAA guidelines you must have a night vision compatible cockpit and use FAA approved night vision devices. So I would never :)
@@asfannin very cool. Yes, these make a world of a difference at distance like I demonstrated but just as much up close. Allows you to see an entire cockpit instead of half at best or most of a patient.
the APNVG is not compatible with the chimera, the dovetail on the tube housing is different but they are making their own version soon for them. im guessing it was to avoid patent infringements with the GPNVG.
14:17 for the ADHD MFs among you.
I was also saying that the APNVG looks slightly auburn, I meant to say olive. The housing gives it a slight pale greenish-blue hue vs the solid blue hue of the DTNVS. That is from the lenses on the housing and not the intensifier tubes themselves. It seems to allow for a more detailed image although that is also likely a culmination of all the high quality specs combined.
Can't believe this video doesn't have a ton of views. As a former PVS-14 to ANVIS-9 to J-31 user, this is really freaking cool to know what it's like to see as an end user.
Thank you. I found it frustrating myself that there's literally zero images of what they actually look like to use so figured I'd fix that
Nice upload. 🎉gotta admit, you had us in the first half
10:06 technically its the third housing, The GPNVG is a beefed up version of the Anvis-10
Super gain 3200 fom dual tubes. Or 2200 fom quads which is better
quads by far. you wont really notice a huge difference between 2200s and 3200s honestly.. in this video you see the difference between 1800 and 2400 and its not crazy but dual to quads is MASSIVE
Do you fly with nods? What is that experience like?
In order to fly with night vision per FAA guidelines you must have a night vision compatible cockpit and use FAA approved night vision devices. So I would never :)
Flight Nurse here. These would be freaking amazing. I was issued ANVIS-9s, but use my personal Jerry 31s. These would be a freaking game changer.
@@asfannin very cool. Yes, these make a world of a difference at distance like I demonstrated but just as much up close. Allows you to see an entire cockpit instead of half at best or most of a patient.
@@asfannin what additional capability does night vision do for a flight nurse?
I heard the chimera articulating bridge isn’t compatible with the apnvg. Cite custom nightvision arnvg video
the APNVG is not compatible with the chimera, the dovetail on the tube housing is different but they are making their own version soon for them. im guessing it was to avoid patent infringements with the GPNVG.
Hey thanks for another cool video! What state do you live in?
Fed