I had tears in my eyes, I whished she was abducted by a female that she took care of here and then a happy ending with a family reunion. Why the heck did he kill her? For which motive ? How can a human do such a thing for another human? I which I was there to protect her!
Another thing you all need to learn when you're going to show these videos take that music and tone it down turn it down you can't hear the narrator what he's saying I have said this time and time again you would get further when people could understand what the narrator was saying show people of witnesses and that can get involved and help our authorities find criminals thank you
Frank Atwood should not have been out of prison. He was put to death June 8th 2022 for Vikki's murder. Over 37 years after his guilty verdict in the case. His wife attended and so did the victim's family and others. He was the first to be executed in AZ after a 7 year moratorium. Just awful. Thank God for dogs and dog walkers. They find so many bodies and remains. From just hours after death to years. And these aren't trained professionals. This is why trained dogs should be brought in ASAP if possible. Also this isn't the first case where it was the child's first time alowed out alone for a very short trip. Six year old Derrick Robie was on his way to the park to play baseball only a very short way away, while his mother cared for his fussy younger brother in a very small town in NY. Parents should not blame themselves. These cases are VERY rare....however terrible they are we have to educate our kids as best we can and allow them freedom. Maybe follow them the first few times? Vikki Lynn was on a two block trip to a post office box.......should have been safe and the vast majority of children usually are.
44:05 Selecting 12-18 people, depending on how many alternates are required, for a jury in ANY case involving _some_ kind of wrong, hurtful or abusive act towards a child is EXTREMELY difficult because most people automatically give children - their innocence & plight - the benefit of doubt and credibility as opposed to how they'll see the person who's being blamed for the action them. Just the implicit bias is a hard enough hurdle to get over, let alone weeding out those who've never dealt with child abuse - themselves or tangentially - and those who are willing to cast aside all preconceived notions and to believe & trust that the remaining group will follow & rely JUST on the evidence given or shown throughout trial. The last case I sat for took 4 days to pick our group and upon our entrance into the jury room, it was pretty ridiculous how SURE most of them already were that the guy was guilty - BEFORE the trial had even begun! They heard the victim's age & what he allegedly did to her (no SA), looked at him and made up their minds which was EXACTLY what we were warned AHEAD of time & SPECIFICALLY instructed upon selection, NOT to do! The trial lasted 2 days and EVERY time we went back to that room, even when we weren't supposed to talk about it amongst ourselves yet, most just couldn't resist trying to twist words & stuff to get the others to change their opinion and boy, did they NOT refrain from low-ball & scummy ways to intimidate & bully people. I could read between the lines and the undocumented history of the parties in the case, so I had a different opinion than the rest and, in the end, it came down to me; I was the last man standing, and in the way of a unanimous verdict. It was the 4th day of trial and we had until 5PM to render a verdict - if we didn't by then, we'd have had to go back the next day and resume the "deliberation", which nobody wanted. By 2:30 PM, my children were threatened and then another juror, a woman, threatened to have them taken away. WHY they allowed a CPS supervisor, who eventually ADMITTED that she looked into the parties case AFTER the trial started, stay on the jury absolutely FLOORED & IRRITATED me - especially because, again, she did EXACTLY what she SWORE she WOULDN'T do! It was beyond aggravating and when I tried to convey the situation to the judge, the officer refused to accept my note and instructed me to continue talking with everyone else, then she suggested that I might "see the light" because, as she said: "If I was the only holdout in a case and verdicts are determined by whether or not there's _'reasonable doubt',_ then how _'reasonable'_ would/could my doubt/position be if nobody agrees?" After one final & emotional explanation of my view & opinion on everything, a few others started to understand and even agreed with me, so the conversation resumed. We finally agreed there was NO intent for harm and there WAS much premeditated provocation that led to the whole event. So instead of the 2 felonies he was facing, and I'm confident he would've been convicted of had I not been there, he got 1 misdemeanor instead. Us jurors were released from our service at 4:45PM. I only got an apology from 1 of them as we were in the parking lot and sure enough, a social worker was at my door the next day - the SAME time we were supposed to report for jury duty. The allegation was the EXACT act that the guy at trial was accused of doing, except she replaced him with my kid's father - which she got wrong - and the DIDN'T even have the name nor age of the kid he supposedly hurt! It was blatantly obvious that the CPS supervisor from the jury had followed through on her threat, but it backfired when she was suspended & fired.
Why do these videos show police cars with emergency strobe lights flashing and, often sirens sounding, when portraying officers conducting a search or responding to events like an apparently abandoned vehicle?
NEW YAWK AFFICE!!!
I had tears in my eyes, I whished she was abducted by a female that she took care of here and then a happy ending with a family reunion. Why the heck did he kill her? For which motive ? How can a human do such a thing for another human? I which I was there to protect her!
Pls put cases after 2000.
Another thing you all need to learn when you're going to show these videos take that music and tone it down turn it down you can't hear the narrator what he's saying I have said this time and time again you would get further when people could understand what the narrator was saying show people of witnesses and that can get involved and help our authorities find criminals thank you
Very true
Thats the way the sound levels are ,when the tv show was made over 20 years ago 🙄
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
They cannot change anything since this was how it originally aired.
This show was played ln tv. I don't think they can alter the music
Monsters let lose …..
just to bring grief to the community ….
Frank Atwood should not have been out of prison.
He was put to death June 8th 2022 for Vikki's murder.
Over 37 years after his guilty verdict in the case.
His wife attended and so did the victim's family and others.
He was the first to be executed in AZ after a 7 year moratorium.
Just awful.
Thank God for dogs and dog walkers.
They find so many bodies and remains.
From just hours after death to years.
And these aren't trained professionals.
This is why trained dogs should be brought in ASAP if possible.
Also this isn't the first case where it was the child's first time alowed out alone for a very short trip.
Six year old Derrick Robie was on his way to the park to play baseball only a very short way away,
while his mother cared for his fussy younger brother in a very small town in NY.
Parents should not blame themselves.
These cases are VERY rare....however terrible they are we have to educate our kids as best we can and allow them freedom.
Maybe follow them the first few times?
Vikki Lynn was on a two block trip to a post office box.......should have been safe and the vast majority of children usually are.
First comment with substance tho
44:05 Selecting 12-18 people, depending on how many alternates are required, for a jury in ANY case involving _some_ kind of wrong, hurtful or abusive act towards a child is EXTREMELY difficult because most people automatically give children - their innocence & plight - the benefit of doubt and credibility as opposed to how they'll see the person who's being blamed for the action them. Just the implicit bias is a hard enough hurdle to get over, let alone weeding out those who've never dealt with child abuse - themselves or tangentially - and those who are willing to cast aside all preconceived notions and to believe & trust that the remaining group will follow & rely JUST on the evidence given or shown throughout trial.
The last case I sat for took 4 days to pick our group and upon our entrance into the jury room, it was pretty ridiculous how SURE most of them already were that the guy was guilty - BEFORE the trial had even begun! They heard the victim's age & what he allegedly did to her (no SA), looked at him and made up their minds which was EXACTLY what we were warned AHEAD of time & SPECIFICALLY instructed upon selection, NOT to do! The trial lasted 2 days and EVERY time we went back to that room, even when we weren't supposed to talk about it amongst ourselves yet, most just couldn't resist trying to twist words & stuff to get the others to change their opinion and boy, did they NOT refrain from low-ball & scummy ways to intimidate & bully people. I could read between the lines and the undocumented history of the parties in the case, so I had a different opinion than the rest and, in the end, it came down to me; I was the last man standing, and in the way of a unanimous verdict. It was the 4th day of trial and we had until 5PM to render a verdict - if we didn't by then, we'd have had to go back the next day and resume the "deliberation", which nobody wanted. By 2:30 PM, my children were threatened and then another juror, a woman, threatened to have them taken away. WHY they allowed a CPS supervisor, who eventually ADMITTED that she looked into the parties case AFTER the trial started, stay on the jury absolutely FLOORED & IRRITATED me - especially because, again, she did EXACTLY what she SWORE she WOULDN'T do! It was beyond aggravating and when I tried to convey the situation to the judge, the officer refused to accept my note and instructed me to continue talking with everyone else, then she suggested that I might "see the light" because, as she said: "If I was the only holdout in a case and verdicts are determined by whether or not there's _'reasonable doubt',_ then how _'reasonable'_ would/could my doubt/position be if nobody agrees?"
After one final & emotional explanation of my view & opinion on everything, a few others started to understand and even agreed with me, so the conversation resumed. We finally agreed there was NO intent for harm and there WAS much premeditated provocation that led to the whole event. So instead of the 2 felonies he was facing, and I'm confident he would've been convicted of had I not been there, he got 1 misdemeanor instead. Us jurors were released from our service at 4:45PM. I only got an apology from 1 of them as we were in the parking lot and sure enough, a social worker was at my door the next day - the SAME time we were supposed to report for jury duty. The allegation was the EXACT act that the guy at trial was accused of doing, except she replaced him with my kid's father - which she got wrong - and the DIDN'T even have the name nor age of the kid he supposedly hurt! It was blatantly obvious that the CPS supervisor from the jury had followed through on her threat, but it backfired when she was suspended & fired.
His mother is just as disgusting as him knowing her son touched a child and is still defending him gross
Why do these videos show police cars with emergency strobe lights flashing and, often sirens sounding, when portraying officers conducting a search or responding to events like an apparently abandoned vehicle?
First here
No I m first one
tell me the story again , uncle kallstrom.
lousy sound
Sleeping time.