The Basics Of Poker EV | Poker Quick Plays

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ค. 2024
  • Practice estimating and calculating EV between sessions with tons of exercises (and a complete answer key) with SplitSuit's Poker Math & Preflop Workbook: www.splitsuit.com/poker-prefl...
    In this video you will learn all about #poker EV. #EV, short for expected value, is the mathematical way of saying "this play is expected to net me $X amount of money in the longrun." Learn why this is a longrun focused concept and how to calculate it with ease.
    We go through the formula step-by-step to ensure you fully understand it and use an example to show its application in poker. If you are looking for more material on the concept, check out this free article: www.splitsuit.com/simple-poke...

ความคิดเห็น • 596

  • @ThePokerBank
    @ThePokerBank  4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Want to see more examples? This video goes through 6 preflop all-in examples and shows you how to calculate the EV in all of them: th-cam.com/video/LkOhbn81Q_o/w-d-xo.html

  • @xverticlz
    @xverticlz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +305

    *all in*
    Me- hold on let me whip out my calculator real quick

  • @michaelbaker5180
    @michaelbaker5180 2 ปีที่แล้ว +287

    This is by far the most clear and concise explanation of EV I've heard. Well done and thank you very much.

  • @dannyderes4907
    @dannyderes4907 4 ปีที่แล้ว +617

    The more I learn about this game the more I get confused.

    • @michaelbrill1305
      @michaelbrill1305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@AG-ur1lj ahh yes the classic, losing player comes to a comment section and pretends he's a winning player. Sad

    • @ce-rf3lg
      @ce-rf3lg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      U gotta play more instead of "learn" more

    • @specijalac
      @specijalac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      And always are there some fool with 0,1% of luck and river always be that one card for him. I can be pro but there is always some fool that calls you all in with 6 9 suitedand hits three of kind orsometh8ng better against your KK or AA

    • @DinsAFK
      @DinsAFK ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thought people would just understand this before even learning poker. It's like just looking at a balance and telling if 1 side outweighs the other

    • @jrviade85
      @jrviade85 ปีที่แล้ว

      😄

  • @SpecialPenguinnn
    @SpecialPenguinnn 9 ปีที่แล้ว +284

    Jeez finally somebody that can explain the fundamentals... thumbs up, faved, subbed....

    • @David-ud9ju
      @David-ud9ju 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, good luck getting out your computer during a live game. This is only for people who play online and, even then, it's kind of stupid.

    • @chrisgolden1162
      @chrisgolden1162 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      David ummmm... no, just fucking no.... holy fuck, please don’t breed...

    • @renoraider9817
      @renoraider9817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@chrisgolden1162 No Chris! We want people like him at the poker table.

    • @kn0wahh
      @kn0wahh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      David whale

    • @michaelbrill1305
      @michaelbrill1305 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@renoraider9817u not fooling anybody, your not a winning player. Get a life

  • @TonyEnglandUK
    @TonyEnglandUK 7 ปีที่แล้ว +668

    It wasn't til I started learning poker that I wished I'd listened to my maths teacher more.

    • @arizonadank2244
      @arizonadank2244 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tony England lol no joke

    • @24magiccarrot
      @24magiccarrot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      The maths in poker isn't that hard because more often than not you are dealing with the same scenarios over and over again and in most cases the math has been done for you elsewhere. Very rarely do you need to do the math at the table, most situations should be covered in your study away from the table, and when you are at the table it's more about feel based on the theory you've learned away from the table.

    • @24magiccarrot
      @24magiccarrot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Tony England I see you replied to this, but your comment has disappeared, but I can read it from my email, do you still want a response?

    • @cleanlee193
      @cleanlee193 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      24magiccarrot I would like to talk with you more I want some poker friends :)

    • @TonyEnglandUK
      @TonyEnglandUK 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@24magiccarrot I realise this is a very late reply but yes, I'd love a response. I have no idea where my comment went!

  • @davewatson3398
    @davewatson3398 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I understand the math. It’s the “over a period of time” thing that usually gets in the way of this mathematical approach. Many folks gone broke because they ran out of money before they ran out of time.

    • @jayslay6782
      @jayslay6782 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ve always started small, begin with 10$ betting tables and keep that money there slowly growing and occasionally take money off it if you need to buy something (assuming it’s reasonable). If your money collapses then you only have to spend 10$ to try and rebuild it

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      This is why BRM (bankroll management) is key too =)

    • @tiagomota4734
      @tiagomota4734 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Without an understanding of Bankroll management you just wont make it, you can be the best player on the planet , the Lebron of poker , you will mizerably fail!

  • @slobodanreka1088
    @slobodanreka1088 4 ปีที่แล้ว +199

    "In the long run, the math will bring everything back to EV."
    Never played on PokerStars, huh?

    • @jlateralus21
      @jlateralus21 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      In pokerstars +ev also depends on if you have the bigger stack 😂

    • @cenifh
      @cenifh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I installed 4 days ago and after a few tables I could tell something fishy was going on. People getting rivered all the time and beautiful hands (straights, flush, full house). Betting with a set was really scary.

    • @dagreenblazer5958
      @dagreenblazer5958 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When the Jokerstars RNG chip goes into Entertainment mode!

    • @ProfitCircle
      @ProfitCircle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@9charlie84 First of all, I've been playing for years and never saw something about a badge. Second of all I've cashed over 60k and know some other good players that have cashed more than that so you probably just suck at the game

    • @VaylewMusic
      @VaylewMusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      cenifh are you sure that you didn’t play 6+ hold em?

  • @craigwoods4579
    @craigwoods4579 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This simplified EV for me so much, thank you

  • @jackglendenning8509
    @jackglendenning8509 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have to say your videos are amazing and the information is gold. Thank you so much

  • @voiceinside
    @voiceinside 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation. Thank you so much!

  • @scottytolson6175
    @scottytolson6175 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    James once again great video, find all your videos very informative and useful in my day to day grind keep up the good work .

  • @Jaipaii
    @Jaipaii 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Amazing video! Super clear, the graphics are simple and function! Easy to understand.

  • @virgildeyro1200
    @virgildeyro1200 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Made me not want to quit poker with yoir videos especially this one. Very clear and in depth and informative. Thank you.

  • @imitationreality
    @imitationreality 2 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    The tricky part here is that EV over millions of hands is tough for any human being to consistently stick with. When you factor in tilting and misreading ranges this equation becomes quite skewed especially for the average player. I agree with everything he said but keeping with these principles is extremely difficult when you take into all of the variables that the average player endures. When I say average player, I mean recreational players not trying to make a living, but trying to enjoy themselves while making some money at the same time. Just be aware of what kind of player you are before you apply these principles whole heartedly. Just my 2 cents...

    • @Drew_Guitarist
      @Drew_Guitarist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      True. That is reality. But with the knowledge of odds, we can instinctively understand correct plays and this gives us an edge over this that do not even consider these mathematical principles.

    • @lolipedofin
      @lolipedofin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. But this video makes a great explanation of what EV is in a single instance against random villain's range.

    • @ManTheDan
      @ManTheDan ปีที่แล้ว

      Which is exactly why if you can study and master this, you're gonna make some money

    • @nigelvarney4042
      @nigelvarney4042 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Drew_Guitarist Gday Drew, thanks very much for pointing that out. I'm rec player with ambitions of going pro in two years from now. At one stage I was thinking just get better at reading people's ranges, then I won't need to rely on EV calculations as I can simply choose correct plays. Yes, this will give us an edge! Cheers

    • @Woodynik
      @Woodynik 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you practice this equation at home hundreds of times, I promise, you’ll be able to do it in seconds. Hardest part is memorizing equity for the hands you place them on during a live game. No calculators allowed at the table. I’m no Rainman, but I believe it’s possible to memorize equity if you’re tenacious enough.

  • @Greatness411
    @Greatness411 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video; thanks. I like the way you explain it while using the visuals.

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Cheryl Means thanks Cheryl!

  • @Gledii
    @Gledii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great explanation. im wondering what will be quick shortcuts that one can think on the spot situation. any tips?

  • @noahschumacher5906
    @noahschumacher5906 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video that cleared up all my confusion. Thank you!

  • @johnmar6376
    @johnmar6376 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you James. You are the greatest!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @theeverliving
    @theeverliving 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I appreciated Eeore explaning this

  • @gergelypatko3939
    @gergelypatko3939 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome explanation! Thank You! :)

  • @Leslie.Draper
    @Leslie.Draper 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow you are soooo good at explaining things. Thanks so much.

  • @McGavel1
    @McGavel1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Awesome explanation! Thanks a ton!

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      McGavel1 You're very welcome!

  • @philpowell3416
    @philpowell3416 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful. All your videos are great.

  • @neuvocastezero1838
    @neuvocastezero1838 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, very well presented.

  • @000001willy
    @000001willy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video demonstrates how sophisticated poker players play poker and why they win more often than amateurs. They are playing at a totally different level of complexity. It also explains why most of the pros take a long time to make a decision whether to call or fold. I never this type of calculus was going on in the background of most hands.

  • @ramukaka6035
    @ramukaka6035 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally a good poker channel to subscribe

  • @jeannieh3661
    @jeannieh3661 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, this is gold!

  • @KiaNooriComedy
    @KiaNooriComedy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. This was explained so well. Thank you bro!

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome Kia!

  • @thomasgould8857
    @thomasgould8857 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great job!
    Thank you for simplifying EV

    • @splitsuit
      @splitsuit 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're very welcome Thomas!

  • @dakid2323
    @dakid2323 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such an Insightful Video

  • @susanbender4725
    @susanbender4725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you...ths was clear and helpful

  • @gavinbrinck
    @gavinbrinck ปีที่แล้ว

    How is equity calculated?
    Would you suggest using ‘universal’ ranges(GTO) to start.. adjusting based off of play/information found ..?

  • @jay34532
    @jay34532 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When do we need to calculate the actual EV? Would it be suitable to just use the equity to pot odds to calculate if its a positive EV call and act accordingly?

  • @cbs03able
    @cbs03able 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brilliant video James. Thank you very much for imparting your wisdom. Just one question: Are there any particular ways you'd recommend practicing EV calculations?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For sure! Just play with this free spreadsheet for awhile: redchippoker.com/free-poker-ev-spreadsheet/

  • @ericorabello
    @ericorabello 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simple and straight to the point! Thank you so much!! Great material!
    Two questions though:
    When you say that we have to practice EV calculations, do you mean in a session review or during the hand? It seems easier to select some hands and analyse them by EV perspective to see if we acted correctly, is that right?
    Also, if I'm in a hand and make decisions based on good pot odds, would it mean +EV decisions automatically?

    • @jbaru1211
      @jbaru1211 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      you look ugly. but to answer your question if you study this stuff outside the session then youll find spots where that studying is applicable. nobody calculates their actual EV. you guesstimate based on opponents range, your hand, and the board

    • @alexyaacoub4242
      @alexyaacoub4242 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jbaru1211 why'd u do him like that

  • @dimitrakisladasi5496
    @dimitrakisladasi5496 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    when you say milllion hand s you say that for instance in this example if you have this hand ace queend with this all in raise...that hands might become different days and on diferrent tables right??

  • @gavinbrinck
    @gavinbrinck ปีที่แล้ว

    great stuff ! what's the best ways to estimate an opponents range ? generally, will you play tighter against 'erratic' players, that could get lucky ie- don't have a well founded range..?
    how to play fish/players; suss them out over the long term ?
    thanks ! :))PO

  • @Masoch1st
    @Masoch1st 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is great thank you

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're very welcome!

  • @mellmckn
    @mellmckn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have been playing poker for only 4 days and I really love it, but got to admit this is scary. But your videos are such a great help! Thanks for all the free videos you are offering us.

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Mell Snow you're very welcome Mell. Welcome to the wonderful world of poker!

    • @cyruslever586
      @cyruslever586 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dont start with this. theres a lot of basics you should learn first. just keep this in mind but dont actually worry about it yet

    • @FK93209
      @FK93209 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Care to share these first points of study?
      Thanks

    • @cyruslever586
      @cyruslever586 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FK93209 starting hands,position,betting lines,board reading

  • @mwbrazier
    @mwbrazier 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    There is one part of this that I am struggling with. I understand how this can be proven mathematically if we could be certain about our opponent's range. But how can we be certain that our assumption about his range isn't wrong? For example, what if A-J & K-Q wasn't truly in his range? Wouldn't this completely throw off our calculation? And what about someone who is trying to play like Phil Ivey & puts in a 5th raise preflop holding 5-2... How do we put him on a range? Do we just say that his range is any 2 cards?

    • @neocitran9996
      @neocitran9996 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You can't. It's just a framework for reasoning. If the person is an idiot or overly aggressive it can throw things way off. This is just a baseline. First hand I had today some idiot went all-in with k9o pre flop and he was on my left. I backed way off until he was gone. I knew that any hand I played he could just dump all-in and I'd end up in some 55% to 45% situation and stand a good chance to lose. But until someone exposes themselves by their actions, it's a good place to start. Those elite guys mix it up like crazy, fold well and bluff well. Even some of the people who just play for $10 to $20 are pretty good.

  • @Kochos
    @Kochos 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome graphics and explanation. I have an app in which you input the number of players on the hand, your cards and the table cards and then calculates two percentages; Win% and Equity%. What's the difference between Win% and Equity% ?

  • @carlosortegaart
    @carlosortegaart 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation! thank you

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome Carlos!

  • @tomakoman
    @tomakoman 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks!

  • @Burningarrow7
    @Burningarrow7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ok but how do you figure out what the win and loss percentage will be without a site like pokerstrategy? And how do you know which range of hands of our opponent to consider?

    • @alexhachey1806
      @alexhachey1806 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Elly Rust watching you oppenents play for a while will help you understand their ranges and tendencies. With practise you can become more educated on good (+ev) or bad (-ev) spots.

    • @marialuiza1122
      @marialuiza1122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I read that most of the range vs range stats studying happens off-game, also in more common situations experienced players will simply "know" a play is good EV because he/she has run into it countless times

  • @ixishadesixi5101
    @ixishadesixi5101 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video thanks! Subscribed

  • @freemoneygrinder1154
    @freemoneygrinder1154 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is where you start! Nice video mate

  • @martinhebert3223
    @martinhebert3223 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you calculate Rake, it might not be profitable to make that call.
    Also, in order to reduce variance, its better to let some equity goes. It might not seems optimal on the long run, but it stabilize your bankroll and your psychologic and this is +EV.

  • @TimHVids
    @TimHVids 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for your videos James, these are very helpful! I have a comment about situations like these when it comes to tournament poker. I understand that most of these videos will suit cash games more than tournaments. If this situation happened early in a tournament is this still a call? Is it worth getting into a coin flip situation? For tournaments is it wrong that I think folding here is +EV? I just feel that calling and winning < calling and loosing thus busting out of a tournament that I could have gone deep in. Please share your thoughts on this!

    • @splitsuit
      @splitsuit 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are very welcome Tim.
      A +EV situation is a +EV situation, regardless of whether it's in a cash game or MTT. That being said, in MTTs, SNGs, etc. you do need to consider the one-life-to-live mentality and gauge whether taking a thin + EV spot is best...or if your overall edge in the tournament is great enough where you should pass on a super thin + EV spot, even though it's technically + EV. That's the whole artform of tournament poker...balancing + EV plays with optimal plays given the exact parameters of that stage of a tournament

    • @TimHVids
      @TimHVids 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      James (SplitSuit) Very Well Put!! Thanks for your reply!!

    • @splitsuit
      @splitsuit 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tim H Thanks, and you are very welcome

    • @fanicia42
      @fanicia42 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      i know this is old but it's a great question so i wanted to contribute to the debate (even though im no expert).
      i think that in a tournament the villain would have a way smaller range because he's only got that one chance to win aswell. so unless he's a total maniac he'll probably only go all in with premium pairs

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      fanicia42 if that's the case (that the range is smaller), the video gives you the tools/formula to plug in that new range and get a correct EV. These videos are all about teaching a framework, and in this case you can just plug in your range assumptions into the math and get your exact answer :)

  • @81bhoke
    @81bhoke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Playing it kinda fast as loose with the term “not too bad”....

  • @chriscavani1601
    @chriscavani1601 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome, really interesting video. Unfortunately, I don't understand how you decide your opponents range of hands or what "sevens plus" and "king queen plus" means. Could you explain that please?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chris Cavani thanks Chris! 77+ means a player holds 77 and all pairs bigger (so 88, 99...KK,AA). And KQ+ means a player holds KQ and AQ. If you want to learn more about hand reading, SplitSuit is hosting a webinar on this exact topic soon that you'll want to checkout: www.splitsuit.com/hand-reading-webinar/

    • @chriscavani1601
      @chriscavani1601 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great, cheers!

  • @lev269
    @lev269 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video -thank you

  • @bustdees1324
    @bustdees1324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easy call right? When you were explaining opponents range i thought you would go way wider considering they only have $12 and are SB vs BB here.. great explanation though sir!

  • @bobbyfontaine
    @bobbyfontaine 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation. thanks

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome Chris!

  • @Shanya7100
    @Shanya7100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you simulate the hand? is it manual design or you using an app?

  • @MOOOMIX
    @MOOOMIX 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have a video that takes into account the effect of rake on your EV and ranges you play? I play in some 5%-10% uncapped rake games. With the hand you showed with AQ, I would fold in a real game given the range you assigned the villain, due to the rake (47% chance win vs the range you assigned, and 45% pot odds). Although, there are other considerations like image where sometimes you have to give action to get action with your monsters.

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +MOOOMIX we don't discuss rake a ton because it's so variable and usually not too huge of a factor. That being said, in a 5-10% UNCAPPED RAKE game the rake will bury you. If possible, avoid that game like the plague since it's not long term viable.

  • @Linky609
    @Linky609 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The biggest key to all of these strategies is sample size. If youre a rec that plays every once in a while variance can wreck using an ev strategy just because the number of hands can struggle to balance the beat in close ev spots.

    • @michaelmcgovern9881
      @michaelmcgovern9881 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Regardless you wanna make the most optimal play though

  • @maniac7314
    @maniac7314 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video!

  • @ygbiz_inc3698
    @ygbiz_inc3698 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you SO much

  • @liambdevine757
    @liambdevine757 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How would you be able to do this in your head quickly, or do you use some sort of program to do so?

    • @rentacowisgoogle
      @rentacowisgoogle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's impossible to calculate the exactly correct number every time. You'll need to gamble on how accurate your read is, of your opponents range for example.

  • @bisme5906
    @bisme5906 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    where can i go to practice

  • @ferdimillsap5609
    @ferdimillsap5609 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is all fascinating but how do I find this specific "fish" at the table?

  • @diowk
    @diowk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In micro stakes cash games their range here would be AA, KK, AK, and AQ suited. Generally not much else when they open shove

  • @Lastellaofficial
    @Lastellaofficial 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to ask you what do I have to do if I flop a top pair but the flop is draw heavy?When do I have to make a protection bet? What type of flop is good to make that move? I was thinking that a protecion bet on a draw heavy flop,if the opponent has some kind of projects , would be called because if we bet 80 % of the pot is a good call statistically with a project: ex.pot size 100 we bet 80 and the opponent calculates his flush draw EV = 0.35 * 260 - 0.65 * 80 = 91 - 52 = +39 .Can you give me hints about when and how to do a good protection bet? Waiting for your reply, I thanks you for all your videos and comments.

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lastellaofficial You might want to watch this video first: th-cam.com/video/ZweW1bmiYLU/w-d-xo.html (since it dispels the focus on "protection bets")

  • @joshuadutchman7269
    @joshuadutchman7269 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have no idea (prevideo) of this EV. If I say I have an un-worded feel. But I can teach you about "pase" as you can guess, once someone starts one. They all follow it, leading to an all around bluff control

  • @nict5683
    @nict5683 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How do you decide your opponent's range of hands you should use to calculate equity?

    • @Leukron
      @Leukron 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nic Turuk in short. You’re going to guess. The longer you’re at the table and the longer you play with specific people you can put them on a range of hands, based on their actions, bets and their showdowns. Then you need to know your win % based on the range you put that person on.

    • @mathiashls
      @mathiashls 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, this is not bs, this is how it's done. If you're playing with some crazy guy with crazy hands like that, you are probably playing with amateurs. It is really hard to play against amateur because the range they are playing is often really wide, and is because of that we have cases like the Hellmuth's "He called me with a Q 10, honey" meme. But as Chris said, if you are playing for a long time with this "funny fcker", you will be able to discover that he plays those hands and because of that, the range for this "funny fcker" will be really wide. But the math is the same.
      You don't need to believe me, or believe Chris Leung tho. If you need to hear the same thing we are saying, but from a pro, search for Negreanu's tips videos, he post it often.

    • @KIWI-un8fs
      @KIWI-un8fs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Marek Mega that's why you always raise in preflop, keep away the limpers!

    • @bbbudja
      @bbbudja 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mathiashls link the video

    • @alainkaizer7769
      @alainkaizer7769 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Based on where that player is positioned at the table.

  • @jayslupesky
    @jayslupesky ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @Paltibenlaish
    @Paltibenlaish 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    some other option for equitylab for mac? or online

  • @ViJayC1424
    @ViJayC1424 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    and also can we use that equity when we are facing a decision in a MTT?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most certainly! Equity is a huge element of MTT decisions

  • @igoralecu6673
    @igoralecu6673 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the rake? Wouldnt it give the hand -ev?

  • @SamsonJudge
    @SamsonJudge 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you factor in the odds of a split pot? Or is that just ignored?

  • @himethpeiris7999
    @himethpeiris7999 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How do you think of a person's ranges on the spot

    • @neocitran9996
      @neocitran9996 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Their stack, table position and past behaviour are a good start.

    • @wtfisditvoorbullshit
      @wtfisditvoorbullshit 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What kind of sandwich they had at the table and how loosey goosey they were eating it. The more loosey goosey, the bigger the range.

    • @kimjong-un5562
      @kimjong-un5562 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      U just see what hands they win with . Because a person who always wins win aces will always bluf a few times u just gotta catch em on the bluff lol

  • @brucejsanchez
    @brucejsanchez 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great for calling but is there one for betting?

  • @captainnolan5062
    @captainnolan5062 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, when you are in the tricky range and can not calculate it at the table, wouldn't be folding be the correct play; thus limiting your played hands to those situations where you are pretty sure you have a positive EV?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Folding would be the *safe* play, but it's easy to slide into being far too nitty.

    • @captainnolan5062
      @captainnolan5062 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ThePokerBank But we are calculating these numbers in our head, and we are estimating the percentage change of winning [by estimating the range of hands our opponent will play], What if we are off by 3% in our calculation (which is not too far off for an estimate); now the EV is minus 17 cents (.45 x 13 = $5.88) - (.55 x 11 = $6.05). At the beginning of our poker playing career, can we really be expected to nail down [i.e. estimate our change of wining] the chance of winning with less than a 2% margin of error, so that we know when such a close bet is profitable (+EV)?

  • @lincolnrogers4944
    @lincolnrogers4944 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you calculate expected value of winning?? ie how does equilab calulate it

  • @deependra2008
    @deependra2008 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good vid dude...

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Deependra Vikram thanks!

  • @rabitozoctuikalon943
    @rabitozoctuikalon943 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even if the EV is positive, can the good play be to fold? IF you are big stacked or if you know you are better than other players at the table ?

    • @rivahkillah
      @rivahkillah 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. Am example would be if you're big blind in a SnG, and the very first hand every single player goes all in. Even if you have pocket Aces, almost guaranteeing 2nd place and it's corresponding prize might be better than calling. One reason would be to limit variance, and another could be if the prizes are somewhat flat.

  • @Michel_Duguerrec
    @Michel_Duguerrec 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it legal to use equilab while playing online ?

  • @thefish292
    @thefish292 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this only when a opponent moves all in? Or can we use it also on the flop or on the turn or on the river?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Fish you'd want to get familiar with the advanced EV equation to calculate a spot where there action isn't complete yet: th-cam.com/video/ym1774AC5Ww/w-d-xo.html

    • @thefish292
      @thefish292 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Poker Bank Thank u so much!

  • @ViJayC1424
    @ViJayC1424 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    is there any way that we can calculate Equity without a poker calculator when we are playing live at cash online tables? any suggestions about it?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      With lots of off-table practice you will begin to get a good internal feel for Equity. But you can also use the 4/2 rule to estimate equity when drawing...

  • @mzockt
    @mzockt ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi James, do the 11$ don't matter in the formula? We can win 24 instead of 13$. That would make the EV 5,45$. Or does EV ignore the money we can win back ?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  ปีที่แล้ว

      Only money you've previously put in the pot gets included in the $W. Money you have not previously put in (like the $11 in this example) would only get accounted for as risk and not as reward. I hope that helps!

  • @bin4ry_d3struct0r
    @bin4ry_d3struct0r 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In terms of practical training, is it your goal to memorize all the results of your equity calculation so it becomes instinctual when you're at the felt?

    • @ImperiumLibertas
      @ImperiumLibertas 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      From what I understand, and I'm very new still studdying, is that you generalize your opponantes range and memorize the odds of a handful of generalized ranges and go from there. Please anyone correct me if I'm wrong. I have no clue what I'm doing haha.
      With experience you might note down a few hands and how they were played to later put them in a solver which might be helpful if you face the same situation again.

  • @willinnewhaven3285
    @willinnewhaven3285 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Adding more _pairs_ to the shover's range _does not_ improve your +EV. However, adding unpaired hands does.

  • @mohit189
    @mohit189 ปีที่แล้ว

    But how do we pedict our opponent range accurately ..as a simply a slightest change can lead to negative ev from positive ev.

  • @liosrgi3902
    @liosrgi3902 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we don’t have the strategy poker how I find the present win or lose ???

  • @danielhayden999
    @danielhayden999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "The math is simple", proceeds to use an equity calculator...

  • @BettySwollocks55
    @BettySwollocks55 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi I’m still new to all of this and I’m confused at how to understand quickly what the win% and lose% would be for the hands. I know working one out will solve the other but does anyone have a easy method to being able to plug that percentage while in game?
    Thanks!

    • @wesleykim1758
      @wesleykim1758 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would just study away from the table than plug it in at the table. There are plenty of charts and sites to use if you want to know what the optimal strategies are for each spot, and look at enough of those and you'll get a decent idea of what your equity in the pot is and what your general strategy should be.
      I dont have every spot memorized but I have a rough idea of where I'm at and my guesstimates on my EV normally fluctuates between 5% and 10% from my actual EV in hands that get to showdown.
      Big thing to remember is this is a Basic EV formula. A standard EV formula should include fold equity, which means how much money you make when your opponent folds. Equity in the hand does matter, but remember that equity assumes that when called no more betting occurs, so while at the time you only own 43% of the pot it may increase or decrease based on what cards come out, so if you can get your opponent to fold their equity and you know you can get them to fold at a frequency that is profitable it is sometimes plus EV to bet even if your Equity is awful like 24%
      My suggestion for a decent site to get started on is PokerCoaching.com since it has the basics and the advanced should you want to go that far

    • @BettySwollocks55
      @BettySwollocks55 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wesleykim1758 thank you brother massive help

  • @hexpinteas
    @hexpinteas 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I understand the first round completely but how do you calculate the %W and %L for the second round and etc. ?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you mean flop by "second round"? Or something else?

    • @hexpinteas
      @hexpinteas 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ThePokerBank Like how you’ve described that throughout the first round it’s a .47 vs a .53 so during the second hand what’s the outcome of the %W and the %L and how did you came to that conclusion?

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hexpinteasYou can calculate equity with a tool like Equilab: www.splitsuit.com/equilab-poker-software-video

    • @hexpinteas
      @hexpinteas 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ThePokerBank Thanks!

  • @DJcyberslash
    @DJcyberslash 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you figure out opponents range

  • @kusnigram9991
    @kusnigram9991 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Equity 47% means will win or tie 47% of the time ,win rate will be around ~42% with pokerstove or ~44% with equilab. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    • @Noxopoker
      @Noxopoker ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe yes maybe no, because nome of the flops doesnt have tie

  • @UnkleRiceYo
    @UnkleRiceYo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does this work when you’re not the final better in the round? Like you can’t tell how much you’ll win if there are more people left to bet after you?

  • @QuinnSlattery
    @QuinnSlattery 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How accurate can I reasonably expect a hand range to be?
    And wouldn't wild players completely ruin EV since they don't have an easily predictable range?

    • @RackwitzG
      @RackwitzG 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not in the long run. Money is won from weak players that play their weak hands too far. Be ready for some wild swings with wild players though.

  • @HASE61
    @HASE61 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thats so fucking interesting. I just started to try to learn about the Maths and Strategy behind poker. I would have never thought how complex this game actually is.

  • @chrisanderson4044
    @chrisanderson4044 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just seems so pointless (and I know it’s not) to me because you’re just taking a guess as to what your opponents range is. If I go to vegas and sit down in a poker room im not going to have any idea what anyone’s range is for awhile.

  • @nfc14g
    @nfc14g 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cash table only? Tournament seems all about the sequence of events that lead to to this hand and announced coin toss

  • @edwardhalmarack7122
    @edwardhalmarack7122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fold is -1 in the aq example.

  • @ryangomez1754
    @ryangomez1754 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dont know if you'll reply to this but heres hoping....how do u factor in implied odds when using the formula??

    • @ThePokerBank
      @ThePokerBank  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Ryan. You can use the Advanced EV formula and modify it to account for future value: th-cam.com/video/ym1774AC5Ww/w-d-xo.html

  • @user-di6le4uf8t
    @user-di6le4uf8t 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does it mean that I can use EV only playing Heads Up?

    • @24magiccarrot
      @24magiccarrot 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No because you'd still need to figure out your opponents range of hands not everyone plays the same way heads up.

  • @davisbarill9432
    @davisbarill9432 ปีที่แล้ว

    So how do I quickly calculate this in a game?

  • @svmohata
    @svmohata 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How much does a pot size matter here? Eg what if he shoved $30.. would that change our decision to call?

    • @daanmeulendijks3511
      @daanmeulendijks3511 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ofcouse it would, but thats more of a matter of knowing your opponant, is he/she a very loose player who plays every hand? or would your opponant only do this with pocket aces? plus, how much is $30 to that player? it is a whole lot of difference when his stack is $600, when you more easily put $30 in the pot than whenever your stack is only$50. this is why there is no best strategy to poker, there is a matimathical side to poker but there is a psychological side as wel