Geological Evidences for a Young Earth - Pt 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 มิ.ย. 2024
- Some people claim that our planet is billions of years old. The geologic features we see are supposedly ancient, carved out over long spans of time by natural processes. Is this true?
Host Lauren and Dr. Tim Clarey discuss this important topic on episode 55 of The Creation Podcast!
This is part 2 of a 2 part podcast! Watch Part 1 here: • Geological Evidences f...
-
Do you have questions about science or Scripture? Post them in the comments and we might answer them in future episodes.
Tune in every other Tuesday here on TH-cam for new episodes. You can also find the audio version on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, and Google Podcasts.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel to get notified about all of our upcoming episodes!
Hope to see you next time on The Creation Podcast!
-
Learn more about the Institute for Creation Research: www.icr.org/
Shop our store: www.icr.org/store
Support our ministry: www.icr.org/donate
Plan your visit to our Dallas creation museum and planetarium: discoverycenter.icr.org/ - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
ICR has been diligently holding forth the truth for many years. I recommend them often.
@mirandahotspring4019 Miranda- how do animals drown and get preserved in mass numbers? That's what you have across the globe. Yet no transitional ones? Open your eyes. Tectonic flood is how. And associated simultaneous volcano's, brought on the ice age. That's exactly what happened.
Wake up chick. Jake
@@UserRandJ Stop pushing nonsense.
@vladtheemailer3223 Can't you handle it ? Facts are facts. No interest in your emotional reactions. J
@@vladtheemailer3223 Search tectonic flood and refute me on it then.
@@UserRandJ Some people have a problem with the Bible having correctly identified nations that have risen and fallen - covered by many feet of sand and rubble: Sumeria, Mesopotamia, Babylon, etc. That's their problem.
It's this kind of research this makes me want to keep giving my donations to ICR. THANK YOU
THAT IS THE ONLY THING THEY WONT "YOUR DONATIONS".
I have a lot of respect for ICR and the effort they put into their research. They are much more likely to provide the data and assumptions in their research than most. They are also much more likely to point out the flaws in many of the models people just take for granite. I believe the issue of how the plate tectonics worked in the past and what are its mechanism even today still need a lot of work. One thing is for sure that is very obvious from empirical experimentation, the standard model for sedimentation is flawed beyond all credibility, any person can see that given any modeling of actual sedimentation experiments.
Have you considered hydroplate theory? I believe it's a credible alternative to catastrophic plate tectonics, especially given the implausibility of plate subduction given the extremely high friction the mantle would present.
PROVE IT
I generally take the models for quartz or for feldspar. I never take anything for granite, or for granted either.
Great vid. Great channel.
I wish to thank you for sharing this part two podcast video with me .
Baumgardener's flood model has always come to me with a check in my spirit.
For me, there's no comparison.
Walt Brown's hydroplate theory fits the Bible, presents the mechanisms, and covers all of Earth's geologic features to this day.
They both agree on many things, but Walt, i believe, is more in tune with God and his Word, where Jerry was more in tune with his computer print outs.
Just looked up Brown's hydroplate theory. He mentions the stretching of the earth's crust, but then just continues to connect the plate tectonic theory to his theory. I think the earth expansion theory makes here much more sense.
@@magistradox39Makes more sense according to what? If you have no regard for God's Word, then sure, anything goes. And a computer simulation is only as good as it's software engineer. The Bible gives the flood its starting point, then gravity, the laws of physics, and material mechanics take over from there until every major geologic feature is fully explained, and, miraculously aligning with the framework of God's holy word.
Yeah but the flood never happened
I take the Bible 100% serious. So you still can come to different conclusions in regards of "scientific" theories.
@@magistradox39 then you're just a huge idiot because you have no evidence to back your claims
God's word will always prove true, sooner or later. 🙂🙏✝️ God bless ICR
Do you see Nature as evidence of who/what God is? IOW, if God is the direct "author" of Nature, then Nature is also God's Word -- actually if you go by Scripture, Nature is the direct result of God's Word.
In that framework, I would trust Nature more than Scripture -- which has more human input than nature -- more compilation committees, more translations.
So, logically, I would posit that when both are correctly understood, Nature and Scripture will agree -- when they don't, then you don't correctly understand one or both.
@@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt I can see where you are coming from but the reason the bible is more important is because it explains God's plan of salvation. Nature reveals that there is a God. The bible reveals how to approach that God. 🙏🙏🙏
@@newcreationinchrist1423
I respectfully disagree -- God's Spirit teaches us how to approach God.
You can have a doctorate in Biblical Exegesis and not know God. You can, however, know God without ever having heard of the Bible.
@@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt knowing of is not the same as having a relationship with.
Yes people study for the sake of admiration however having a relationship proves that the word is truth.
You'd be surprised what you think the Bible states vs what is actually written.
If you have a relationship with God you should thirst for the word. The spirit of truth confirms sound doctrine.
@@Nobody85746 well put!
Great video!
Great and helpful
Snelling is from Australia where the aboriginal people have no record of a flood in their 70,000 yr history . Actually, there is no record of the human population disappearing at the supposed time of Noah . Every culture just kept on living !
Thanks for these videos!
Reading many of the comments, we have people who question scientific theory, Logic, laws of physics, and hard to imagine events. Since God invented and created all of these he is not bound by them. The laws are only in place so that creation will function without God needing to turn the handle. Once you are able to credit God with creation, anything is possible, or you can remain restrained by your own mental capacity.
They are willingly ignorant. They believe in nothing exploding into every and cannot see their own blind faiths absurdity
Look at the asteroid belt you'll be able to figure out where the debris from the south season areas around Australia where it all disappeared to. The pearl necklace that protects the Earth.
***EARTH IS ALWAYS YOUNG, IT IS RECREATED EVERY MOMENT***
And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.
In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations
Genesis 10:32
These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in th
Divided by language maybe?
First of all, you need a King James Bible. It does not say nations divided. It says the earth was divided. That’s why you need to be very careful with these modern versions. They are twisting God’s word over and over.
Genesis 10:25 KJV
And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother's name was Joktan.
@@digitaldazzle5836 I'm off German and of eastern European origin. I use the German language. And I not only use the Masoretic text, but the Septuagint too which is the base of the Bible for the Orthodox Church. In German the older Luther translations, Schlachter, Menge, Züricher Bible. But best is a Interlinear Bible where you see the hebre and greek words side by side to an English or German word. You will see that the KJV has errors too. For example: it translates: You shall not murder wrongly with you shall not kill.
@@digitaldazzle5836 The first reference to Peleg is found in Genesis 10:25, which reads the same as 1 Chronicles 1:19. Immediately following, in Genesis 11, is the event that describes this division of the earth: the Tower of Babel.
At the Tower of Babel, the Lord was displeased with the actions of people who sought to build a tower to the heavens and “make a name” for themselves (Genesis 11:4). In judgment, God confused their languages so they could no longer understand one another. The account ends with this summary: “That is why it was called Babel-because there the LORD confused the language of the whole world. From there the LORD scattered them over the face of the whole earth” (Genesis 11:9).
Peleg’s family history is noted once again following the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:16-19). The fact that Peleg is mentioned before and immediately after the account of the Tower of Babel helps clarify that this is the key event that divided the earth. It seems the earth was not divided geologically, but its people were divided into various language groups.
Peleg’s family history is noted once again following the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:16-19). The fact that Peleg is mentioned before and immediately after the account of the Tower of Babel helps clarify that this is the key event that divided the earth. It seems the earth was not divided geologically, but its people were divided into various language groups.
Whale bones miles away from any water, sea life on top of Mountains, Noah's ark found in Turkey, along with the graves of Noah, and his wife, and by the way, her height was 12ft. tall, the Village where the Ark was found is called, land of the eight, and anchor stones discovered by Crusaders leading up to the Ark, it does not matter what you discover, they will refuse to believe.
You’re right dude. They suppress the truth in unrighteousness. They love their sin and they don’t want God telling them what to do and I was the same. I used to “believe”all that rubbish, well more like chose to believe that than the truth. But thankfully, in the end I had to repent and turn back to God. Isaiah 53:5. 🙏😎👍🏻
For Noah's ark to be real, you need to have ignored all biological knowledge
@@steveindorset Thank you for sharing that brother, hopefully, we will sit together at the great feast of the Lord, God bless you my friend.
@@davidlloyd1750 hopefully? Definitely mate. Our names are written in the book of life. 😎👍🏻
@@steveindorset that part is the best of all, that are names are written in the book of life ✌
You only see what you want to see. And then if you can’t find it, you make it up. Believing in Jesus is the most satisfying thing in the world that is trying to cover up the truth every day.
Nice video guys.
Have we found any planets anywhere with tectonic plates?
Yes. Io
@@Bean-boi Middle Earth and Krypton dont count lo
***WHY DO YOU QUESTION? FIND OUT, BECAME A SCIENTIST!***
@@HS-zk5nn but Io does
@@Bean-boi Io is NOT a planet. and no Io doesnt not have plates. please read some basic science
2500,000m / 150days / 24 hours/ 60 minutes/ 60sec = 0.193meters per second
@@mirandahotspring4019 look up papers on early earth....
Pretty flat indeed
@@mirandahotspring4019 look it up ....under sea valleys lifted up..... cover the earth easily with all that water 70% covered today
@@mirandahotspring4019 right after the Bible declared it 5 centuries earlier in David's psalms
@@mirandahotspring4019 look it up you lazy....
@@mirandahotspring4019 Greek philosophers all borrowed extensively from monotheism...which predates Greek thought by centuries...look it up
Has anyone else seen the expanding earth theory? It’s the one that makes the most sense to me, and fits perfectly with a global flood, and is better than Pangea as the continents fit perfectly together when you take away all the oceans. But basically the earth used to be smaller with compressed water on the inside. It cracked open and the ocean floors expanded as the waters from within poured out.
Yes. As a German I find the earth expansion theory very interesting. Specially because it was very popular before the second world war. Before everything got unified, uniformed with another, not so convincing theory: plate tectonic theory.
The Earth popped like a piece of popcorn, when the Flood was unleashed! Have you considered the idea that the Earth before the flood, didn't have any massive oceans, so essentially the earth was one big continent? Not that there weren't bodies of water like lakes, but a majority was underneath just waiting for the day when the Lord would have to flood it.
Any evidence for that? Gou know, the thing you can't provide
@@Bean-boi - Prophet Ḥanoch [Enoch] said that the heavens collapsed & water descended. He also taught that the land went up & down, that mountains folded on top of one another & new valleys or chasms were made for the water of the Deluge to flow into afterwards. I remember reading all of that but Chapter 83 (R.H.C). is one place where I remember that it talks about most of that.
*”And now, my son Methuṣelah, I [Ḥanoch] will show thee all my visions which I have seen, recounting them before thee. Two visions I saw before I took a wife, and the one was quite unlike the other: the first when I was learning to write: the second before I took thy mother, (when) I saw a terrible vision. And regarding them I prayed to the Lord. I had laid me down in the house of my grandfather Mahalalel [מַהֲלַלאֵל], (when) I saw in a vision how the heaven collapsed and was borne off and fell to the earth. And when it fell to the earth I saw how the earth was swallowed up in a great abyss, and mountains were suspended on mountains, and hills sank down on hills, and high trees were rent from their stems, and hurled down and sunk in the abyss. And thereupon a word fell into my mouth, and I lifted up (my voice) to cry aloud, and said: ' The earth is destroyed.' And my grandfather Mahalalel waked me as I lay near him, and said unto me: ' Why dost thou cry so, my son, and why dost thou make such lamentation?' And I recounted to him the whole vision which I had seen, and he said unto me: ' A terrible thing hast thou seen, my son, and of grave moment is thy dream- vision as to the secrets of all the sin of the earth: it must sink into the abyss and be destroyed with a great destruction. And now, my son, arise and make petition to the Lord of glory, since thou art a believer, that a remnant may remain on the earth, and that He may not destroy the whole earth. My son, from heaven all this will come upon the earth, and upon the earth there will be great destruction.” (1 Ḥanoch [Enoch] 83:1-10).*
2 Esdras says water covered only 1/7th of the earth surface before the flood.
In the book of Jubilees, Noah divides the whole earth among his children and the rivers out of Eden are mentionned as natural limits, though after the flood they're no longer to be seen.
Your idea of the absence of oceans before the flood is the right biblical paradigm.
A river system of five rivers and some lake was all the bodies of water of all the earth, but they must've been huge.
Check the research by The God culture, the rivers of Eden series.
@Numbersix… good ones. That’s exactly how I believe it happened as well. It just makes so much sense.
What about the heat created by all of this geological activity?
YEAH- like the ' Ring of fire' simultaneous volcanos- why would we have volcano's occurring rapidly lime that? Tectonic flood Mark. = iceage
This was nice to listen to a geologist talk about his experience, but I didn't see or hear anything to point to a young earth. Genesis and astrophysics don't disagree with one another. We don't need to divide ourselves up between 6 days or 13 billion years, it's the same thing. It only matters your perspective from where you want to take your measurement. Time is relative to speed and gravity. The fact that the author of Genesis knew this proves that the text was divinely inspired, down to the letter and punctuation mark.
@@mirandahotspring4019 The fact that they knew it was 6 days from the beginning until humans arrived on the scene is the exact number you would get if you had a functioning clock in the center of the universe when you account for the gravity of all matter in one spot and then make the changing calculations for the decrease in gravity and the increase in speed of all expanding matter/energy. How else would they know that back then without being divinely inspired?
@mirandahotspring4019 You have a weak bias at best. Some day you will grow up. Genesis is very evident throughout the world. So too is Exodus. But you'd need to actually want to know. They are not exactly promulgating it- in every example it's refuted pathetically. And others have gone in to show the refuting to be worthless. Way too many examples to include in this comment. Try researching it and quit postulating through your views.
@@mirandahotspring4019 It didn’t say they were created on that day, but that they became visible. That’s exactly what geologists and the fossil record say about our planet. It would have had a vapor cloud around it that was so thick that only sunlight could get through. That thick vapor kept the bacteria safe from the sun’s ultraviolet radiation until enough of the bacteria we’re able to produce the oxygen, and nitrogen needed to form an atmosphere that could stop the radiation. That’s not an explanation justifying those verses, planetary geologists had that idea and confirmed it (to the best of their ability) a very long time ago.
@@mirandahotspring4019 The earth being in the center of the universe was never in the Bible, but it was assumed so. That’s why Copernicus was ex-communicated then buried in an unmarked grave under a church. Later on the Catholic Church realized he was right, and it didn’t contradict the Bible. So they dug him up and gave him a proper burial.
@@mirandahotspring4019 The conclusion was from Einstein’s theory of relativity. Also from observed astrophysics. All the stars and galaxies are moving away from a point so it only makes sense that they are coming from that place. So rewind it and you can find the center. Also, you don’t have to know the coordinates of that center but a calculation of the known mass of the universe is fine.
I can’t seem to post formulas here for you to check out, they just show up as unknown characters.
But look up Einstein’s Time Dilation, a short one that starts with Delta T = and then look up relativistic time. It’s longer but it’s (T2-T1) = .
What about the theory that the earth was enveloped by water. Both sides agree that earth had . Could it have been both new sea floor and water envelop being broken
So was Pangea, Eden? And the garden was in the middle?
Thank you atheistic mockers and scoffers for proving the Bible true once again! May God bless you and open your eyes while there is still time...
Christians make up the majority of the western world, as well as having most positions of power. You aren't being oppressed at all. We just don't like lies
Maybe be careful of people deliberately who use archaic language. In modern English, there's no such word as "evidences"! 😠
I would question their other beliefs based on this piece of evidence.
Digging dirt we exposed whale bones at 900 ft above sea level
@@dennisholst4322 mountains were once underwater. Do you even know how mountains are formed?
@@Bean-boi70% of land, by the current model, was a part of pangea prior to complex ocean life (multicellular organisms), yet we see sea fossils of complex organisms on every continent, all over them.
😏
13028 years old by scripture
I personally think pangea was circular in shape.
@@appleseedmusicshop3096 I put Africa into the Weddell Sea and South America into the Ross Sea by Antarctica.
What did god make the earth from ?
His Word. He spoke the universe into existence.
He formed it from atoms (consisting of protons, neutrons and electrons) that were grouped into molecules, just like everything else. Genesis 2:7 “And God formed man from the dust of the ground.” Science and the Bible agree.
The dust of the ground (or the matter that earth is made from) consists of the same molecules that form all humans. Everything, including us, is made entirely from atoms, the subatomic particles of which are found scattered freely in space. The only two things that are not composed of atoms are neutron stars, which is all that is left after an aging star collapses in on itself, and black holes which are vacuums or anti-matter that consist of nothing.
Everything comes from something, and there is nothing hidden in the Bible if you know where to look.
@@chris20874 No he didn’t speak the universe into being. The Word He “spoke” is merely the statement of His desire, just like you saying you would like French fries for dinner. French fries don’t appear because you thought them into being, but because you thought or said you wanted them and then you did whatever it was that was required to make it happen. Please read my response to the original commenter’s question.
Read the Bible to know the truth about the universe. It's the only book ever written that stated thousands of years ago that the universe had a beginning, is expanding, has fixed laws of physics, that everything that is detectable is made from that which is undetectable (Scientists call it nothing 😂) there are mountains, valleys, springs and pathways under the sea and many more truths. Only God could have known these FACTS. The God of the Bible is outside of energy, matter, space and time because He created everything. Therefore all other gods are man-made and anyone who has the audacity to question the Bible creation events which are 100% correct must be outside the universe. The conditions and sequence of creation events in the Bible have been scientifically confirmed in very recent years. All Bible prophecies come to pass exactly as prophesied. This is undeniable proof as only God knows the end from the beginning. Hope this answers your question. Maranatha
He made the earth from the physical elements (carbon, silicon, iron, hydrogen, oxygen, etc)...but those elements he made from congealed energy. Jesus continues to hold all these things together.
God said He gathered all the land to one place. So all the land was IN one place at creation. And if you want to call that pangea So be it. We know all the land masses were connected because the layers with same Material are all over the continents.its possible a pole shift may have triggered the flood
0.193 meters per second is immensely fast for an object that size....pushed up mount Everest like dried pudding...kkkkk
***HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT?***
@@adelinomorte7421 I just calculated that on the other comment
That is velocity, not acceleration. Please study high school level physics
Never mentioned acceleration.....
@@theologyscienceandpropheti6808for your argument to work, there needs to be acceleration. You can move perfectly fine in a plane because the acceleration isn't a lot
The evidence is all over the world, but those with scales on their eyes due to their sin of unbelieve will always argue with truth. Always! Our eyes are opened to see the truth and the evidence. The war of over what's true will only end when Jesus comes. You can't make anyone believe. When they choose to believe, God will draw them to Jesus and THEN God will open their eyes. Daniel wrote, "none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand" (12:10).
Have you ever considered the possibility of being wrong?
@@Bean-boi
I have. And then I listened to the Atheist worldview of Evolution(even though some theists believe it too).....
And I realized that Evolution is a philosophy and not based on science.
Both Creationist and Evolutionists have faith in their assumptions.
A Creationists assumptions have had more science to back it over the past thousands of years of recorded history than the past 150 years of Evolution (more specifically Macroevolution and billions of years for universe that is based on the physical only and no need for God.)
Evolutionists are always claiming a breakthrough (confirmation bias) which falls by the wayside and for some reason doesn't get retracted. They also cherry pick evidence and sciencesplain suspect evidence.....
@Bean-boi if we are wrong then God's testimony isn't true if his testimony is not true then there is no hope for man so eat and drink for tomorrow we die
@@phillipgray7371 if you're wrong, then you've just been bamboozled. Humanity won't end just because one of the 1000 religions comes out as false
@@Bean-boiIt sounds like you and naturalists have a problem with being wrong. I was an atheist for 27-yrs...and I was wrong on many things...but one thing I refused to be wrong on, was naturalism. I refused to consider any non-naturalistic processes or events. I was dogmatic and the supernatural was strictly forbidden, don't even mention it around me. We see this today, the secularists even went so far as to have a gag order placed on Intelligent Design...in the US, this was the famous Kitzmiller v Dover case in 2005.
Good stuff. But ... (there's always a but) I think all of you guys like Dr. Tim here, and Andrew Snelling et. al. are all wet (pun intended) in one area: the timing of the continental separation. None of you guys have EVER (apparently) spent any time at sea. I have, on destroyer class ships (which are about as long as the Ark was and a similar beam) and bird farms (aka aircraft carriers.) It is incredibly violent aboard a ship when there are heavy seas just caused by wind. You have no idea. Yet you people think, la la la la, that Noah would have survived floating on the Ark while entire CONTINENTS were moving underneath. PREPOSTEROUS! Have any of you EVER tried to simulate what would have happened at the surface of the oceans if continents were sliding around underneath you? No, you haven't. And that's critical if you want to make a believable case for separation during the Flood.
IMO, the Bible pretty explicitly tells us when the continents separated: the 239 years of the life of Peleg. "In his days the Earth was divided." Not the nations, not the peoples, but the earth itself. And since this occurred around the same time as Babel it makes sense that God would have used confusion of languages plus continental separation to disperse people.
So not only do you have no scriptural justification for your timing but you fail to consider the effect on the surface of the ocean for poor old Noah, his family, and all those animals floating up there in his barge. On at least 2 occasions my frigate took 50+ degree rolls and that was just from wind driven seas aboard a powered vessel which could maneuver to minimize the effects of the sea. Noah would probably have had to endure monstrous ... gigantic waves beyond comprehension for months on end. I say "probably" because I really have no idea how bad it would have been. And I have no idea because nobody (like you guys) has ever tried to do realistic modeling of what it would have been like.
And there's one more thing. For this to have happened in one year, you have to have forces strong enough to accelerate entire continents and then decelerate them, all in one year's time. I don't buy it. When you guys make an effort to include an unpowered vessel on the surface of the sea in your models, then I'll take you seriously. Otherwise ... I think you're all wet on your timing.
I appreciate the concerns you shared here. My initial thought is we make an error when we assume natural processes we experience today (wave motion, wind effects) were the same for Noah. That is your key assumption here...and it may be faulty. The possible resolution here is that God had the ark in a protective, supernatural "bubble". It's not mentioned in Genesis, but certainly not everything is mentioned in scripture. The only hint I'm going off of here is God promised to "save" everyone inside of the ark.
@@sciencerules8525 And it's misleading to think that you have a handle on ultimate reality just because you can isolate parts of nature and analyze them in a test tube.
You are dismissing the right interprétation of the division of the earth in the days of Peleg and formulating your own erroneous opinion.
The original author knew exactly what he was talking about, no geological mayhem, but the division of earth among Noah's sons and grandsons.
A second Witness to that is the book of Jubilees.
Jubilees ch.9 : 14. And thus the sons of Noah divided unto their sons in the presence of Noah their father, and he bound them all by an oath, imprecating a curse on every one that sought to seize the portion which had not fallen (to him) by his lot. 15. And they all said, "So be it; so be it," for themselves and their sons for ever throughout their generations till the day of judgment, on which the Lord God shall judge them with a sword and with fire, for all the unclean wickedness of their errors, wherewith they have filled the earth with transgression and uncleanness and fornication and sin.
Jubilees ch.8: 8. And in the sixth
1567 A.M.year thereof, she bare him a son, and he called his name Peleg; for in the days when he was born the children of Noah began to divide the earth amongst themselves:
*for this reason he called his name Peleg*
Btw the first victim of the mutual curse is Canaan, meaning Noah was making a prophecy about his grandson. This topic of the curse of Noah has also wild individual opinions, if only you could read Jubilees and let it affirm scriptures.
@@sciencerules8525 Your response tells me you basically have no defense to your belief system...you merely throw accusations around. I expected you to do so. What I did was identify your bigotry...you have embraced a bias that you so deeply hold, it's no longer recognized by you as a bias...it's just "true" to you. You've lost objectivity about it...and you're offended when someone dares to think differently, or present different explanations that falsify your deeply held "truth".
Ok I see a number of responses here. I won't bother with the one about the book of Jubilees. It's not scripture. For Ben Letto, (sbgtrading) look, water is water. It's the same today as it was then. And everything ICR works on depends on the idea that physical processes, i.e. the laws of physics, are the same today as they were then. The fact that God COULD have kept the Ark in a protective bubble is akin to the hand waving of the evolutionists and big bangers. The Bible says nothing about any protective bubble. The sense you get from the text is that the water gradually rose and lifted the Ark up. That speaks to me of a relatively gradual inundation.
If the continents WERE separated, and I certainly believe they were, God could certainly have used catastrophic plate tectonics to do it. But when? I maintain that the Bible says it was later. And if you want to force it into the Flood year, then you have to invent the "bubble" and invoke it to protect Noah. All of you creationist geologists (I'm speaking past Ben Letto now) are stuck like a broken record on putting it in the Flood year.
A person can make up any story that they want and try to justify it. I'm just going by what the Bible says and the sense in which it is said. Admitted, assigning a "sense in which it is said" CAN be subjective and oftentimes that's all you're left with, i.e. a subjective understanding. But it's best to rely on a plain reading of scripture unless you have good reasons not to. The plain reading here is the issue.
SO ... I come back to Peleg. Despite what the apocryphal book of Jubilees says, the BIBLE says the EARTH was divided. According to Strong's and the blue letter bible the KJV translators translated that word, eres, 2500 times as land, earth, country, ground, or world but as "nations" only 1 time. So it's 2500 to 1 that the meaning was the Earth, not the nations. And as I pointed out, a physical separation would fit exactly with the language separation of Babel which occurred in that same time frame.
And I'll reiterate, you have to have a force to accelerate the continents. And then you have to have another force to decelerate them. I stick all that into a 239 year period. You all stick it into 365 days. I feel like quoting Al Borland here: "I don't think so." And then, as a former mariner, I think about old Noah bouncing around on the ocean and again, I say to myself, "I don't think so."
Now I understand. Evolutionists and their friends admit that there are things that they cannot explain and have to keep on searching for an answer. Creationists, on the other hand, just make it up.
You are neglecting the fact that evolutionist are atheists who by their own admission are not intelligently designed. Enough said.
Well, you're right in saying Evolutionists don't have it all figured out. But they do think they have the true philosophy that describes the nature of what the ultimate explanation will look like. They are committed to it being natural law, or natural processes. It's dogmatic naturalism. Well, I appreciate your zeal, but your zeal doesn't make something accurate. It's entirely possible that God did create the world by supernatural forces in 6 days. Heck, it's entirely possible that we are in a simulation that's just minutes old. So you need to lay off the naturalistic dogma and expand your consciousness a little bit.
Can you explain whales having feet?
Evolutionists are scammers. They just want funding.
@@Bean-boi I'd like to see him explain the Cambrian explosion.
Funny how all oil exploration and mining are based on an old earth, just sayin'.
funny how all oil exploration and mining do not need an old earth at all, just sayin'.
@@HS-zk5nn very true.
Funny how all oil exploration and mining are based on a young earth, just sayin'.
@@dougmoore4653can you back your claim with evidence?
@@Bean-boi - sure mt st helens is a great example where wood beds are laid down into rivers and turned into coal beds rather quickly.
Roundballs can't explain the Power of GOD
This gentleman seems very intelligent. He might not realize it, but he has a bad habit of cutting off the host when they speak. Just let her interject a little. Lol.
The bible is iron age bable.
Your comment is new age babble.
@@UserRandJ Nothing new age about it. Simply a fact that you know is right.
@gregjones2217 Can you please reply in emojis, they will better reflect your views. History is far more relevant than you're aware. Bible is shown in archaology - Real places, real people, real events. What can you say to refute that fact? It's just you who does not know of all the relevant sites- but it's easy to point you to them. Though you'd have to stop playing mariokart.
@@UserRandJ Of course there are sites. The writers used them just as any author who writes historic fiction would.
That doesn't mean the story is true. Much of the Jesus story is actually that of Titus Flavius, who was real
The Bible is the devinely inspired, infallible, inerrant WORD OF GOD. I suspect that you don't believe in Him either.
It will be from that book that you will be judged. What an ignorant, arrogant, irreverent creature you are to mock your creator this way.
I honestly can't wait for a random atheist to make a 20 minute long video and easily obliterate every point used in this. The funniest part is that the atheist will do it with no budget
Then why don't you do it yourself?
@@frankoffermans100well, first, oil exist and its existence is proof of an old Earth. Continents and tectonic plates are proof of the Earth changing over a huge period of time. We can also go to the biological side of things (something you very much hate cause you can't disprove it). Evolution is a fact as we can see in bone structures and vestigial organs from basically every animal. The fact that inbreeding is a fact disproves the entire story of Noah's ark. Also, the fact that certain species of animals are found in only specific places, something we wouldn't see after the biblical flood. Are you satisfied or do you need more?
Atheist just means they don't believe in a God. Many atheists never finished high school. Atheism is not a belief system nor do they as a group have singular thinking patterns or any particular expertise in science
atheism is boring
Chances are he will only use a philosophy of science fiction like what Macroevolution, Big Bang Theory, and Abiogenesis is based on. With hardly any evidence at all and definitely no scientific observation behind it, they promote dubious theories. Microevolution is really only adaptation.
Keep trying, and stay true to your faith in the science fiction you believe in. Faith is all you got.
If you adhere to the Atheist Dogma that only the physical can explain the physical, I hope one day you will not be so close minded and stop avoiding critical thinking. Your indoctrination is keeping you myopic in your worldview. Atheists are so gullible in believing made up human constructs like philosophy which is often not based on reality, but self-aggrandizement. "Hey, look how smart I think I am!!!" There's a better way than the delusional Atheist way.
"evidences" is archaic. Why are you guys still using it? Why not use "doth," "thee," and "goest"? 😠
What? And yet you use emojis? Careful when you look in the mirror, you might actually be a pokemon.
@@UserRandJ
Are you abusing narcotics? What the hell is wrong with emojis? What kind of ridiculous defence of employing archaic, outmoded language is that?
"Oh, I use outmoded language because others use emojis???"
I've lost all respect for you for not being clever enough to reply with an intelligent riposte, and not being morally upright enough to reply with an honest response. 🙄
What causes an Atheist to be Emotionally Insecure?
Atheists are emotionally insecure and being insecure atheists want to feel better about themselves and thus atheists insult those people who do not accept their belief that God does not exist because deep inside they know God really does exist. Their knowing God exists and yet their self-denying God’s existence causes a guilty feeling inside the atheist, thus causing the atheist to be emotionally insecure.