Why the GLSDB Is So Cost Effective for Ukraine | WSJ Equipped

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ค. 2024
  • The U.S. is shipping Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bombs to Ukraine, according to a U.S. defense official. The GLSDB is a precision-guided bomb that attaches to a M26 rocket and is considerably cheaper than other long-range missile systems like ATACMS.
    While the GLSDBs won’t be Kyiv’s most powerful or longest-range weapon, WSJ explains how they could add significant flexibility and capacity for military operations.
    Chapters:
    0:00 U.S. shipping GLSDB to Ukraine
    0:43 How the weapon works
    4:15 Pricing and comparisons
    5:12 What’s next?
    WSJ Equipped
    Equipped examines military innovation and tactics emerging around the world, breaking down the tech behind the weaponry and its potential impact.
    #Ukraine #Russia #WSJ

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @piyh3962
    @piyh3962 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +974

    Dude is selling me the GLSDB like a guy showing me the latest features on a Ford Bronco

    • @lawrencefrost9063
      @lawrencefrost9063 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      xD

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      Except the engine in the missile doesn't blow up until it hits the target.. unlike the bronco

    • @ollybears7797
      @ollybears7797 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@rogerwilco5918 That was good I cant lie

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@ollybears7797 😆 Ford circles the problem and highlights it in blue

    • @dennischiu272
      @dennischiu272 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I've seen multiple missile ads that watch like car commercials and it's hilarious.
      Predictably, all the comments are some variation of "Thanks! This will help a lot with home defense."

  • @Teenagegoogoomuk
    @Teenagegoogoomuk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +545

    Chuckin 250 pounds 94 miles is pretty impressive itself.

    • @Doug_Dimmadome
      @Doug_Dimmadome 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      The impressive part is definitely accuracy. ​@@introboy1

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      good luck with that accuracy when Russia is jamming all the GPS, satcomms, cell towers, etc etc@@Doug_Dimmadome

    • @Paul0000
      @Paul0000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's reported; so far NATO seems to understate the actual range of their weapons.

    • @sirzebra
      @sirzebra 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidanalyst671 We all saw how easily ATACAMS breached multiple layers of air defense and EW to get to ships in harbor in the middle of crimea, which is "heavily defended" if you beleive the russians, i wouldn't hold my breath on their capacity to "jam" this GLSDB that even has a lot of optical sensor and guidance that wont care if it's principal GPS guidance is obfuscated.
      To each it's copium, this will, just like before, prove people like you wrong, alas it wont stop this stupid war either.

    • @Atom224
      @Atom224 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can't jam the multiple gyros and accelerometers though.@@davidanalyst671

  • @JZsBFF
    @JZsBFF 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Another game changer?
    The game changed a lot over the last two years.

    • @SerenityMae11
      @SerenityMae11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Tell me about it! Russia is no longer a superpower. Whodathunkit?

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SerenityMae11 Orc Land obviously was never a superpower but the MIC needed that kind of enemy to justify the trillions spent on the military since ww2.
      Btw The real Orc game is subversion: slow but cheap and much more efficient!

    • @JBoy340a
      @JBoy340a 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yep. Ukraine has no navy and is promoting Russian ships to be reefs and other undersea fish habitats.

    • @pacivalmuller9333
      @pacivalmuller9333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@JBoy340a Correction: Ukraine HAD a navy, even an aircraft carrier. What happened to the mighty fleet?

    • @Germanicus2415
      @Germanicus2415 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SerenityMae11 A no superpower that has more nukes than you?

  • @dwaynezilla
    @dwaynezilla 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Looks like someone went "we got lots of these and lots of these, make something good with them."

    • @johnnylind973
      @johnnylind973 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea SAAB in Sweden , and they made an adapter so they could use what already was in stock .

  • @joelrunyan1608
    @joelrunyan1608 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    One thing yall left out. The rocket motor its uses are surplus... they are being disassembled from rockets that have cluster bombs on them currently

    • @clumsiii
      @clumsiii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Exactly. And the cost to decommission them is higher than sending them into the effort to secure Ukraine's independence.
      I wish more people understood these details

    • @barryscott6222
      @barryscott6222 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@clumsiii
      Ukrainian Independance... Riiight.
      Or at least the continued existence of the Banderite puppet regime.
      One or the other.

  • @SayakMajumder
    @SayakMajumder 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +249

    4:58 HIMARS can carry either 6 GMLRS or 1 ATACMS, not both at the same time

    • @bugtesties
      @bugtesties 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      The mlrs could though she probably got them mixed up
      Edit: yeah they got the animation wrong

    • @AnamolHouse
      @AnamolHouse 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      I think they meant sending multiple HIMAS as they usually work in small groups that have different load out.

    • @andyvonbourske6405
      @andyvonbourske6405 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      true but Ukraine also have the m-270 and that could have both i think he got the two mixed up.

    • @kreb7
      @kreb7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think is m270.they refer Ukraine got some from Germany I think

    • @SayakMajumder
      @SayakMajumder 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@kreb7
      Yea Ukraine got M270s from UK, Germany and France.
      If we're talking multiple ATACMS loadout, then the M270 can carry either :
      2 ATACMS + 0 GMLRS or
      1 ATACMS + 6 GMLRS or
      12 GMLRS + 0 ATACMS

  • @citynomad13
    @citynomad13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

    Saab from Sweden is involved. So, not only a US product!

    • @eyescreamcake
      @eyescreamcake 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Thank you Sweden!

    • @jerseyshoredroneservices225
      @jerseyshoredroneservices225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      True. Saab/Boeing

    • @melvinmelvin8577
      @melvinmelvin8577 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Who competing tho! As long as Ukraine gets it! That’s the only thing that matter! Is who’s giving them to Ukraine? That’s y they are talking about United States! Everything isn’t a competition! That divide us! Stay focuse

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@melvinmelvin8577Being brash and taking credit for other people's work divides us. That is universal in all cultures.

    • @jerseyshoredroneservices225
      @jerseyshoredroneservices225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@melvinmelvin8577
      We can be competitive with out friends w/o loosing focus on the on the bigger picture. Competing with our friends makes us all better. The US and Sweden, Saab and Boeing, we are all proud of each other and of our combined efforts to support Ukraine 🙂

  • @ros8737
    @ros8737 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    Two more features mentioned on the SAAB web page:
    • Advanced Anti-Jam GPS System-aided Inertial Navigation System
    • Laser SDB variant for moving target capability

    • @keepyourbilsteins
      @keepyourbilsteins 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      It's a very cool design. Typically launched in hybrid mode, it compares GPS to INS and until it sees GPS drifting, it reverts back to the last known matched fix with ins only. Basically uses the GPS until evidence of EW interference to ensure the best INS solution.

    • @milan51259
      @milan51259 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Wow. Is this the new Samsung Galaxy S25?
      You guys are the biggest sheep of them all. Total propaganda zombies.

    • @JULIAN11.
      @JULIAN11. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@milan51259 Inertial guidance is nothing new, it has been used pretty much since missiles were used
      And laser targeting is nothing particularly advanced? The US has an entire family of air dropped bombs that work that way and the Russians also have an artillery round that works using laser targeting (the Paveway bombs and the Krasnopol shell respectively)

    • @milan51259
      @milan51259 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JULIAN11. Good for you guys. I don't freakin care.

    • @ros8737
      @ros8737 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@JULIAN11. So they fuse together Boeing’s old (GBU-39) small diameter bomb, with Lockhead Martin’s really old M26 rocket to make the GLSDB.
      Now explain to me why these two huge US companies (Boeing and Lockhead) needs little SAAB (Swedish Aeroplane Corporation) to fuse the old parts together if theres nothing innovative about it.

  • @GeoffreyMstr
    @GeoffreyMstr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +163

    I'm very happy to hear this ! Thank you America !

    • @acediadekay3793
      @acediadekay3793 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      And Sweden (The bomb is US, the rocket is Swedish)

    • @CrimsonAlchemist
      @CrimsonAlchemist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ukraine is shooting itself in the foot prolonging the war

    • @extragoogleaccount6061
      @extragoogleaccount6061 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Sweden, woot! Welcome to the club!
      (Not that we didn’t work together already)

    • @Together707
      @Together707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      For what ? They cant mass produce it. You will get 100 of these every month... you are just testing them

    • @zisiskonstantinou1574
      @zisiskonstantinou1574 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Together707 better than nothing

  • @jemerlia
    @jemerlia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The next "gamechanger". More war porn. Profit from pointless killing.

    • @eldragon4076
      @eldragon4076 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are worse than Fascists. Their ideology is profit.

  • @lawrencefrost9063
    @lawrencefrost9063 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +163

    Awesome. Never heard about this. Following the Ukraine conflict is like a very lengthy deep dive to modern weapons systems currently in use.

    • @whiteegretsecurity873
      @whiteegretsecurity873 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      its new, its preferred because the unit cost is about 50K compared to the millions dollar ones that are in short supply and harder to manufacture. The US basically took rockets and "dumb" bombs we had plenty of and attached a GPS glid kit to it.

    • @markryall6243
      @markryall6243 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@whiteegretsecurity873 It's not gps gps can be jammed or spoofed.

    • @igorjuricek5683
      @igorjuricek5683 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      It´s not "Ukraine conflict". It´s russia´s war against Ukraine.

    • @Alastair_Adana
      @Alastair_Adana 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @markryall6243 Специальная военная операция

    • @alexcarrara8140
      @alexcarrara8140 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, no. It's the "Ukraine conflict". A nice test field to try our newest weapons at the meager cost of a bunch of 3d world slavs and some mildly relevant infrastructures.@@igorjuricek5683

  • @Lassemalten
    @Lassemalten 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Completely missed the part where LSDB have an advanced jamming device inside of it unlike ATACMS. The swedes that produce the GLSDB(Saab) claims it's impossible to shot down because of this. We will see about the impossible to shot down part.

    • @wooddogg8
      @wooddogg8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Interesting, didn't know that. Excited to see these things in operation, though we may not find out. Rumor has it they were used in Crimea already.

    • @vegas1a
      @vegas1a 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Curious, about the tiny initial ATACMS delivery to UKR, 13 or 15 units. I would assume that first group were used up long ago, but have more been sent since then?? I watch all these videos and have not heard the term ATACMS used in months.

    • @wooddogg8
      @wooddogg8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vegas1a Not sure but I believe they have and been wisely not reporting everything. I suppose Russian Intelligence finds out but I'm surprised these GLSDB have made such a media splash. Would've been better if they just suddenly appeared. 💥 As they may already have...IDK

    • @ggaggagga4
      @ggaggagga4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "Impossible" is rarely an accurate claim but this weapon seems to make it a resource intensive job to counter.

    • @leonardoorellano6652
      @leonardoorellano6652 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what is it jamming exactly ? can a jam a bullet from a pantsir system for example ?

  • @northwatch8532
    @northwatch8532 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    You can tell the art/graphics person that makes the drawings really has a good time making these.

    • @tankeriv
      @tankeriv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No by the graphics you can see that someone earns a lot of money by keeping this war going and invests a lot to keep the propaganda going.

  • @deecee1522
    @deecee1522 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    SLAVA UKRAINI❤‍🔥

  • @extraterrestrialfascisti7625
    @extraterrestrialfascisti7625 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    This didn't age well LOL
    "GLSDB munitions proven largely ineffective in Ukraine - Pentagon"

  • @gdu370
    @gdu370 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    6:06 facial expression says it all

  • @paulstrathern4309
    @paulstrathern4309 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    WOW! I was just watching the other WSJ story entitled 'Why Does the U.S. Support and Fund Israel So Much? | WSJ' and noticed that the COMMENT SECTION was disabled for SOME reason. Then I clicked on THIS story and find the comment section working as usual. I WONDER why?

    • @kentershackle1329
      @kentershackle1329 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You can't be CRITICAL to ya MASTER...

  • @chrisx2234
    @chrisx2234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Go Ukraine Go, May God be with them (all Ukrainians) in their fight for FREEDOM

    • @rusdmv
      @rusdmv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which freedom? If they would have any, the war would stop today.

    • @killa2959
      @killa2959 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ironic

  • @marcus_ohreallyus
    @marcus_ohreallyus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I think the attack angle variability is a good trade off for the smaller warhead.

  • @Legalizeasbestos
    @Legalizeasbestos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Remember folks, ACCURACY trumps all. I dont need a 2000lb rocket if my 250lb bomb can hit the target every time, or even most of the time. GLSDB takes the guesswork and luck out of long range artillery, you're trading a couple big things for thousands of accurate ones.

  • @OleDiaBole
    @OleDiaBole 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    OH, OH, this one will be game changer.
    Forget Leopard, Himars, Patriot, Stormshadow, Bradley, Zuzana, Baryaktar, Swichblade, 777, Abrams, Caesars, Stridvagn, Irist... I feel this one is it.

    • @michael001437
      @michael001437 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There's no single weapon system that could be considered as a game changer alone, except nuclear weapon. But all those systems together surely are shaking the table.

    • @igormalievsky4462
      @igormalievsky4462 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      if Ukraine received these toys back in 2022, the war probably was over and putin was hanged.

    • @OleDiaBole
      @OleDiaBole 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@igormalievsky4462 Ukraine had gigantic stockpile of soviet legacy weapons and quite heafty supply of western ones in 22. Remember how Angela Merkel admited that Mikns accords were there just to by time and arm neo-nazis.
      But, Russians evaporated it all.
      Keep living in weat dreams and delusions, it suits us.

    • @OleDiaBole
      @OleDiaBole 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@igormalievsky4462 Isnt Russia weakened now? Demolished? Shouldnt those toys be even more efective now? Genius.

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@OleDiaBole If you are trying to claim that western aid has not weakened Russia massively you are delusional. Russia has had to buy weaponry from freaking North Korea 😂

  • @AnglersUAE
    @AnglersUAE 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Another game changer 🎉🎉😂😂

    • @the_real_glabnurb
      @the_real_glabnurb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Maybe, the HIMARs definitely were a game changer. Second game changer were the PATRIOT systems first protecting the major cities and then using them at the front to shoot down Russian jets and choppers.

    • @nervechews6781
      @nervechews6781 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey you know what really would be? All those LGM-30s we're about to replace. Sounds like a party.

    • @snorter9783
      @snorter9783 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@the_real_glabnurb Sure. I remember when WSJ was saying Russia was out of ammunition in March of 2023. When it was saying Russia was a few months away from economic collapse in June of 2023.
      The only "game changer" is the slow grind towards total defeat for Ukraine and America.

  • @vickclash7955
    @vickclash7955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another game changer that change no game!

  • @user-dm6rw6jc7r
    @user-dm6rw6jc7r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    End this war

  • @javier452
    @javier452 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Ummm, sounds like some good features but I think ill wait for the GLSDB 2 to buy...

    • @nenoman3855
      @nenoman3855 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No cup holders = no buy.

    • @solodagci
      @solodagci 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL you must be poor. Don't play the game if you can't flex bro. I'm chugging along with my GLSDBs for 2 years now.

  • @scipioafricanus4875
    @scipioafricanus4875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Great report informative thanks

  • @trifio5242
    @trifio5242 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    This is amazing! Thank you, USA!

  • @romansajapin339
    @romansajapin339 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    New game changer #14, let's gooo. This time for real.

    • @MrBizteck
      @MrBizteck 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tbh theres already several .. game changing systems
      Considering
      Game 1 was Kiev to fall in 3 days.
      Game 2 was Ukraine to never advance.
      Games 3 was Ukraine to sweep to the Coast.
      Game 4 was Russia to grind an slow unstoppable advance
      Game 5 WW1 trench warfare.
      Game changing isnt instint 'I win ' its not a video game. its shaping the situation on the ground.

    • @romansajapin339
      @romansajapin339 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrBizteck More like shaping the narrative. The mental acrobatics you indulge in instead of accepting the true situation.
      In summer, it was "Crimea beach party by the end of August." How did that go? Meanwhile, thousands of Ukrainians keep dying for nothing while keyboard warriors and analysts go on with their "any day now".

  • @SpaceMike3
    @SpaceMike3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Thank you everyone involved in making these things possible.

    • @calokraine5901
      @calokraine5901 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😂 another "game changer" 😢 4 okraine

  • @john_in_phoenix
    @john_in_phoenix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I look forward to hearing about the results, this is great technology.

    • @all-seeingeye6364
      @all-seeingeye6364 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      your results will soon be heard in Phoenix if you are so eager to see them!

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@all-seeingeye6364 Haha what? Is this a threat to the US by a weak non functioning Russia? 😅

    • @mahmutylmaz4175
      @mahmutylmaz4175 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no result.

  • @drgonzo305
    @drgonzo305 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    I love how 250lb bomb is a “small diameter” bomb in the U.S.

    • @cepelinai123
      @cepelinai123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Diameter isn't in lbs

    • @Brendissimo1
      @Brendissimo1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      A 250lb aerial bomb would be considered small in any military. The most common US bombs (Mk. 80 series) come in 250lb, 500lb, 1000lb, and 2000lb varieties. The Russians have a similar range of options, and regularly use bombs as large as 3300lbs.
      And ballistic and cruise missiles used by militaries around the world are often even heavier.

    • @sidharthcs2110
      @sidharthcs2110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Those are two different dimensions.
      How did you manage to miss that?

    • @jerseyshoredroneservices225
      @jerseyshoredroneservices225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      250 pounds is a small bomb in every modern military

    • @michaelberger6699
      @michaelberger6699 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It uses a very energenic explosive.

  • @henriyoung3895
    @henriyoung3895 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This man knows his stuff. So refreshing from so many EXPERTS.

  • @zh2184
    @zh2184 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    The GLSDB needs a catchy nickname. By its look - my vote is for 'Vulture' or 'Buzzard.'

    • @henrikbergman4055
      @henrikbergman4055 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      My contribution is 'Kite'.

    • @christiananderson9015
      @christiananderson9015 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I was thinking they call it "curveball"

    • @RobertFletcherOBE
      @RobertFletcherOBE 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      GlideyMcBombFace

    • @biglasse8164
      @biglasse8164 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@RobertFletcherOBE i like this one

    • @mawuenahafeh7753
      @mawuenahafeh7753 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Launchy Glidy Boom Boom😅

  • @Chaldon-hl6yk
    @Chaldon-hl6yk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Game changer #25

    • @chillydawgg4354
      @chillydawgg4354 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This must be the new rooski propaganda talking point, I've seen this comment like 25 times when no one used that phrase in the video

  • @vaughnedwards1724
    @vaughnedwards1724 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    And it's silent quiet terror ..

  • @ieism1
    @ieism1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    ”keep Ukraine away from defeat" is an interesting concept. Why does the US not want them to win? What is the benefit of stalling this so long?

    • @DimitarBerberu
      @DimitarBerberu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Propaganda is the strongest Western weapon of human destruction :(

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      To not drive russia into a corner where they might use nukes

    • @iainford7592
      @iainford7592 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The crooked Trump and MAGA controlled GoP are holding back more aid for Ukraine.

    • @pacivalmuller9333
      @pacivalmuller9333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sH-ed5yf Russia will not use nukes, West always propagades that RUssia will use nukes sice 70 years from now. But America is the only country to ever use nuclear weapons (on mostly civilians!) and it will be the second one again.

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pacivalmuller9333 actually not. We give wapons to ukraine cause we know they wont use them.
      But a dictatorship with a increasingly dement and hysterical dictstor with nukes is dangoures

  • @chavez4ever111
    @chavez4ever111 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Another Game Changer

    • @pyrophobia133
      @pyrophobia133 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      which one is this?

    • @SerenityMae11
      @SerenityMae11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Threeeeeeee Days to Kieeeeeeeeeeeev! Amiright?

    • @Anti-NPC
      @Anti-NPC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@SerenityMae11i dont think any russian officials said that only US medias

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Anti-NPCOh stop that delusion. It was literally the plan. Remember Lukashenko showing the freaking invasion map on TV?! 😂

    • @alexbukovsky4621
      @alexbukovsky4621 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SerenityMae11 That doesn't change the fact that this is the tenth gamechanger. So save your pathetic attempts to deflect the topic away from something you're uncomfortable with.

  •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Well, about 94 miles is accurately specified as 150 km, which is the maximum range. Developments started almost ten years ago. Many tests along the development took place, notably in northern Sweden. Also, SAAB has brought in a few Norwegian companies to support the development and production. The maximum range is the maximum. Around 100 km is more realistic given the target, which may need to go around, a complex flight path, or a moving target to follow. But of course, under good conditions, the GLSBD will reach 150 km within 1 meter, which is truly excellent. More specific information can be found on the SAAB web page and Wikipedia, which refer to SAAB in many places. As a note, SAAB and Boeing have many ongoing successful cooperations, notably also the new Jet trainer T-7A.

    • @paulbedichek5177
      @paulbedichek5177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The important unknown variable is what is the number of units purchased in this initial order? As this will be it until the new bill passes congress,hopefully 10,000.

  • @Gidowan
    @Gidowan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Однажды все это прилетит вам в страну с неожиданного угла.

  • @blakebrown534
    @blakebrown534 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    It was originally developed for Afghanistan because it allowed to hit targets on the backside of mountains even when you were firing it from the other side. The cheaper price of these hopefully allowed us to send a lot of these to Ukraine - they were part of a prior aid package but are just now being delivered by Boeing and Saab - they use old GMLRS engines from a version we no longer use and there were apparently some issues with them that had to be readjusted.

    • @jerseyshoredroneservices225
      @jerseyshoredroneservices225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I guess you're referring to the small diameter bombs themselves. The GLSDB is a combination of those with old rocket motors that we have.
      This combined weapon was developed in the last year specifically for Ukraine.

    • @Nimboid-20
      @Nimboid-20 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@jerseyshoredroneservices225 At the time the idea was announced, I thought it would have been great if they'd been available the day Progozhin was exploring the caves his Wagner men had just captured in Soledar!

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Nimboid-20or when Putin was in Mariupol 😅

    • @youcantno3963
      @youcantno3963 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NotASeriousMooseCool story. 😂 the only thing putler is doing is warming his feet in luxury while he sends his soldiers to die and the Russian peoples to starve and freeze but keep tugging on his rod. 👍🏼

    • @PeterMcGiffin-ts7qw
      @PeterMcGiffin-ts7qw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jerseyshoredroneservices225 They've been designing GLSDB since 2004. First test was in 2015- long before the Russian invasion.

  • @auritrodcaprio6337
    @auritrodcaprio6337 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thanks for making such detailed easy to understand videos on critical military equipment, it helps the public have a better picture about modern warfare.

  • @doublehelix7880
    @doublehelix7880 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    And what happens when the GPS is jammed? Or we do not talk about this?

    • @jimmiekarlsson4458
      @jimmiekarlsson4458 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It has a advanced anti jamming device,

    • @doublehelix7880
      @doublehelix7880 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jimmiekarlsson4458 And how it prevents the jamming of the GPS signal? It is not a secret that the Russians are doing it on regular basis.

    • @jimmiekarlsson4458
      @jimmiekarlsson4458 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@doublehelix7880 its not only gps guided, it has 2 ways of navigating, ask Boeing and Saab how it works

    • @johndonaldson3619
      @johndonaldson3619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      we dont talk about it cuz you cant -

    • @nastystang113
      @nastystang113 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      SAAB has pretty good EW technologies and that was why SAAB worked on this project specifically.

  • @mortalz9940
    @mortalz9940 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    is this game changer number 56th?

  • @SpectralonWhite
    @SpectralonWhite 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If it was an atacms it easily will stand out more on radar than the unguided MLR.

  • @ziggyc3004
    @ziggyc3004 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Say what you will, but you can thank Ukraine for teaching the Americans to innovate with their own systems.

    • @Horseshoecrabwarrior
      @Horseshoecrabwarrior 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The Ukrainians have come up with some good things, but the GLSDB isn't one of them. It has been designed and available for a long time. The first publicized tests I know of were in 2015.

    • @dennischiu272
      @dennischiu272 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      We Americans have a lot to thank Ukraine for, and not just being military guinea pigs.

    • @kentershackle1329
      @kentershackle1329 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LoL......

    • @StupidDanimations
      @StupidDanimations 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Horseshoecrabwarrior I think they meant Ukrainians are using American weapons in innovative ways; such as using the patriot missile system offensively, ambushing Russian airplanes.

    • @Horseshoecrabwarrior
      @Horseshoecrabwarrior 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @StupidDanimations That is an innovative use the Ukrainians came up with, but that's also not really related to the GLSDB. I wouldn't think they'd bring up something like that.

  • @nenoman3855
    @nenoman3855 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Impressive tech and all that, but I just want 6 cupholders and 2 USB-C charging ports.

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Those add ons are available at IKEA, installation is done with the supplied allen key 😂

    • @JimOtoole-zw5se
      @JimOtoole-zw5se 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup

  • @RaniVeluNachar-kx4lu
    @RaniVeluNachar-kx4lu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is it Fire and Forget? Can it have options; target A or B? Can it send back visual information to the sender or a 2nd watching Drone that communicates back with command to relaunch or redirect or pass and then return?

    • @tuliosportsinc7654
      @tuliosportsinc7654 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      For 40k , it does not need all those features but apparently it can fulfill most of those objectives you raised. SAAB and Boeing combination to get us a 40k precision weapon.

    • @LoanwordEggcorn
      @LoanwordEggcorn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tuliosportsinc7654 Honestly, that's a very good deal.

    • @nietkees6906
      @nietkees6906 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No. No. No.

    • @nietkees6906
      @nietkees6906 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tuliosportsinc7654it costs more than 40k. 40k is only for the SDB. And it can't fulfill these missions, it is only GPS guided.

    • @well-blazeredman6187
      @well-blazeredman6187 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No returns! All launches are final.

  • @djp1234
    @djp1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good video

  • @maxidaho
    @maxidaho 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Video after video, people saying the same thing 4 to 5 time. Just me? How many times does this guy need to say the glide bomb is accurate and can attack from many different angles and attack vectors?

  • @jamiebond8481
    @jamiebond8481 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Awesome 🎉

  • @BCAT3089
    @BCAT3089 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yeah, arrived yesterday

  • @writersquill433
    @writersquill433 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the wings- stirs beautiful memories of balsa wood glider planes that my friends and I used to play with using rubber band launchers, the gliders would do all kinds of patterns depending on the wind.

  • @tatianacrehuet1065
    @tatianacrehuet1065 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thanks, USA for your constant support of Ukraine🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @jaydawg-we6yc
    @jaydawg-we6yc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The Russians are not going to like the ability of this weapon system, launched from HIMARS, 90 mile range, can strike from any angle within a few meters, trenches and bunkers are easy targets as well as moving convoys

    • @barotrauma_32
      @barotrauma_32 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no one will spend it on trenches, but rather on attacks on cities for the purpose of “intimidation”

  • @stupidburp
    @stupidburp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Could be supplied in large numbers due to the lower cost. But the US has paused all aid to Ukraine. A great option that Congress is not willing to fund. What a shame.

    • @Alex-oc2vi
      @Alex-oc2vi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is already funded, it was included in the support packages last year, just havn't been delievered until now.

  • @vitaliyvyntu4566
    @vitaliyvyntu4566 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @crypto_que
    @crypto_que 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    What the WSJ won’t tell you is that US companies are also supplying Russia with electronics and chips for their missiles too. Companies in Europe and Asia buy from the US and Taiwan get sanctioned then pop up as new businesses and do it all over again. We’re playing both sides and making a fortune doing it.

    • @rogerthat4545
      @rogerthat4545 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      And what you conveniently left out is that we're not willingly doing that.

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@rogerthat4545Who are we?
      The companies are doing it with purpose, and our politicians are not closing down loopholes or even enforcing the sanctions we have.

    • @rogerthat4545
      @rogerthat4545 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@NotASeriousMoose Who's "doing it on purpose"? Can you give an example?

  • @wisenG771
    @wisenG771 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Reducing The Male Population of Moscow Everyday. Lol

    • @alexpetrov8871
      @alexpetrov8871 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like 0.3% over two years. Just four more years of war and there will be an impressive 1%.

    • @leedex
      @leedex 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, they are destroying their future workforce and the Russians with money. Are moving to countries like Thailand!

    • @Julioalexlipa
      @Julioalexlipa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They have hundreds of thousands of Central Asian volunteers desperately seeking citizenship. Muscovites are calm with their hot girlfriends

    • @a5cent
      @a5cent 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Unfortunately not. The war would already be over if that was the case.
      Moscow drafts their soldiers from the poorest minority populations in the rural regions in the south and east of Russia. Very few in the major cities are touched.

    • @abdiganiaden
      @abdiganiaden 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@a5cent Still that’s labor that should be in factories or having families to make future soldiers
      Waste of men

  • @Rick.Sanchez
    @Rick.Sanchez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    he seeems to be really liking the from behind part

  • @doug3691
    @doug3691 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good to see this. Efficient use of resources is needed.

  • @_c_y_p_3
    @_c_y_p_3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    We need a victory not a push back. Lets not play with lives.

    • @eyescreamcake
      @eyescreamcake 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately, the Republican Party is under Putin's control because of what he found while hacking their servers. We need to vote them all out of office.

    • @Leo-qd7ih
      @Leo-qd7ih 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You need everything, but will get nothing

    • @davidwee130
      @davidwee130 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody is playing with lives

  • @1971VoiceoftheMummy
    @1971VoiceoftheMummy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    🙏🕊🌻🔱 Excellent Update! Ukraine is Stronger with GLSDB! Glory to Ukraine! Glory to the Heroes! The World Stands Committed with Ukraine! 🔱🌻🕊🙏

  • @jerryone013
    @jerryone013 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Apparently this is an early 2000 tech :O

  • @kineticdeath
    @kineticdeath 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    cant have atacms and other rounds in 1 himars launcher as the atacms takes 1 entire "box", you could do 6 small and 1 atacms on an MLRS though as it has 2 of the "boxes". Of course theres nothing to stop a group of himars from doing this just have 2 fitted with atacms and a 3rd with a mix of smaller diameter rockets in the normal 6 round launcher or whatever vehicle config combination they want

  • @zarjesve2
    @zarjesve2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Video wrongly portray that you can mix six ATACMS in one HIMARS…

    • @f-86zoomer37
      @f-86zoomer37 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not really. You can have 2 himars, one with atacms, and the rest wth M26 motors. Or you can have one M270 with one atacms and six. Ukrainian rockets strikes always involve more than one platform, so you're wrong.

    • @zarjesve2
      @zarjesve2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@f-86zoomer37 I am not wrong but animation in video is wrong!

    • @zach11241
      @zach11241 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Zarjesve..... you’re the one in the wrong here. Please do more research on a subject you’d like to tackle next time.

    • @andrewcrowder4958
      @andrewcrowder4958 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Weird syntax, Comrade.

    • @zarjesve2
      @zarjesve2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zach11241 4:57 animation is WRONG: you can not have ATACMS in pod along anything else.
      It is no wonder why we will lose any future war against any half-serious military!
      We are over confident and STUPID! It is not problem that our people are stupid but problem is that our military planers and generals are also stupid.

  • @vladrazym9955
    @vladrazym9955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Thanks a lot to US and other Ukraine supporters for helping us defend our country. We do appreciate your input.
    Please do not hesitate with new weapons, timing is crucial

    • @Ugerm_Z
      @Ugerm_Z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      How can you message the world from the front line?

    • @jamms2966
      @jamms2966 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@Ugerm_Z the same you comment from the toilet💩 now be sure to wipe towards the back not front so your kitty doesnt get an infection

    • @highdefinist9697
      @highdefinist9697 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ugerm_Z You will find out, within the next few years. The EU will make sure that the Ukrainians won't lose.

    • @zazaza5295
      @zazaza5295 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Все равно в украине половину разворуют и перепродадут. Украинцы, они и во время войны украинцы 😅

  • @jdogdarkness
    @jdogdarkness 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The US military had 360,000 M26 rocket motors stockpiled as of 2006, so the bottleneck is gonna be 1. The GOP 2. The SDB

  • @supremereader7614
    @supremereader7614 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wall street Journal has become one of the best channels

  • @andoreanesnomeo1706
    @andoreanesnomeo1706 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Good job to innovate so quickly on a standard launch platform with surplus ammo. Genius. Hopefully mass production will be ramped up quickly.

  • @saumyacow4435
    @saumyacow4435 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    These things are unlikely to be game changing, unless they can be used in the thousands. So, when will the be shipping in quantity?

    • @SimplySketchyXbox
      @SimplySketchyXbox 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because they're cheaper Ukraine can have more... So yeah, they'll have greater numbers.

    • @kurtwicklund8901
      @kurtwicklund8901 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They can be used in the thousands. The video glossed over that point. They are built from bombs and older rocket motors which already are stockpiled in the thousands. 25 of these can be converted for the cost of one new HIMARS rocket.

    • @foadskyflier
      @foadskyflier 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kurtwicklund8901 Ukraine only has 39 Himars platforms , each can only launch 6 at a time so there is a limitation to how large simultaneous saturated attack they can perform regardless of how much ammo they receive.vehicles

    • @saumyacow4435
      @saumyacow4435 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kurtwicklund8901 Yes but the question is, does the production/integration process create a bottleneck and will the US send all that it can, or dole them out a few dozen at a time?

    • @gwtpictgwtpict4214
      @gwtpictgwtpict4214 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@foadskyflier 6 x 39 = 234, That to me sounds like the potential for a fairly large simultaneous attack

  • @Archy11102
    @Archy11102 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It means nothing. Ukraine is losing ground to Russia at Avdiivka and Robotyne, and while equipment is important, Ukraine lacks what is most important on the battlefield and that is soldiers.

  • @fasx56
    @fasx56 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very informative and precise in describing the new weapon soon to be sent to Ukraine. This smart bomb can change angles as it approaches a target. I do not know what company developed this most capable weapon but they had some sharp Engineers to create this Jewel.

  • @Russia-bullies
    @Russia-bullies 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Glad that the US is considering costs.Something it should’ve been doing ages ago.The cost of getting rid of the warheads should be considered.

  • @12namleht
    @12namleht 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wouldn't the Russians attack HIMARS locations regardless of munition type?

    • @goobfilmcast4239
      @goobfilmcast4239 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      HIMARS can launch then scoot away before the trajectory can be calculated by Russian air defenses. It can be miles away from the original launch location in a few minutes

    • @alberthenriette8976
      @alberthenriette8976 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@goobfilmcast4239Russia already destroyed several HIMARS. In the beginning they were struggling to cope with HIMARS. But now they have new technology to deal with Himars😢

    • @goobfilmcast4239
      @goobfilmcast4239 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ZERO...NONE...ZIP independent verification of ANY HIMARS launcher vehicles having been damaged let alone destroyed. Stop being so triggered, Ivan Botsky@@alberthenriette8976

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alberthenriette8976 Do show one single example of a HIMARS taken out.
      Russia lies so much about what they destory they have become a joke.

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alberthenriette8976 what? Where on earth have you seen a visually confirmed destroyed HIMARS? Can you provide even one?

  • @twitchew
    @twitchew 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is a pretty similar munition (in terms of range/warhead) to stormshadown iirc, and that weapon has been pretty effective. the bonus is that you dont need to use an aircraft like the stormshadow requires.

    • @weissmorris8822
      @weissmorris8822 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The storm shadow is the small diameter bomb, but with a tri-mode seeker.

    • @davefloyd9443
      @davefloyd9443 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      and a 1000lb warhead......

    • @Alex-oc2vi
      @Alex-oc2vi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really, Stormshadow/SCALP has a much larger warhead and a lot longer reach, but this will certainly be useful.

  • @nickjohnson811
    @nickjohnson811 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wouldn't seem too big to create an air dropped version, which would increase its range substantially.

  • @leonli1642
    @leonli1642 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The sales pitch based on "plentiful" M26 rockets may run into some inherent shortcomings. When production of the M26 series ceased in 2001, a total of 506,718 rockets had been produced. The shelf life is only 25 years for each rocket. So even the latest batch produced in 2001 would require to be destroyed in 2026. That's only 2 years away.The US started destroying its M26 stocks in 2007, when the US Army requested $109 million for the destruction of 98,904 M26 MLRS rockets from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2012. M26 rockets were removed from the US Army's active inventory in June 2009 and the remaining rockets were being destroyed as of 2009, but the US requirement to destroy them was removed in 2017.The UK and the Netherlands destroyed their stock of 60,000 M26 rockets by 2013, Italy destroyed its 3,894 rockets by 31 October 2015, Germany its 26,000 by 25 November 2015, and France its 22,000 by 2017. If Ukraine needs to use GLSDBs, they better utilize those M26s quick.

    • @keepyourbilsteins
      @keepyourbilsteins 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hence the delay in fielding. The testing and x-raying of M26 motors includes many past their "use by" date. The motors do not instantly expire at 25 years. In fact, they required testing intervals between every 3-7 years while they were in inventory. Depending upon climate, # of deployments, etc.

    • @JBoy340a
      @JBoy340a 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then it is good time to get these weapons into the field and used by 2026. Also, every military device has a lifespan, and these are often extended by additional inspect and/or maintenance.

  • @chuckkottke
    @chuckkottke 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Good knowledge, thank you Wall Street Journal. Stopgap measures are essential at this moment, the GLSDBs couldn't have come at a more pressing time. 🗽🇺🇦🇺🇸✳️

  • @nipunchandrawansa9014
    @nipunchandrawansa9014 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you can't send aircraft this is the second best option.

    • @bottlethrower1544
      @bottlethrower1544 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Until it isnt. Search for "GLSDB missiles laplante"

  • @satheesselvam2611
    @satheesselvam2611 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome

  • @DavidCoxDallas
    @DavidCoxDallas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    also desperately need to boost production of old-school 155mm artillery rounds!

  • @carlobarrios2061
    @carlobarrios2061 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Bon appetite Vladimir

  • @vandasaragosa
    @vandasaragosa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Sounds like a Good weapon adds

  • @JigilJigil
    @JigilJigil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    beautiful.

  • @user-ij2ks4xw9n
    @user-ij2ks4xw9n 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So let's stop the delays and get them shipped...

  • @nikkivieler3761
    @nikkivieler3761 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Come in from a non predictable angle... That's a great idea...

  • @Hollymountainhwy16
    @Hollymountainhwy16 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This is a good time for testing on the real battlefield. it could still be a lot of bucks that need to be workouts. It's great news to Ukraine 🇺🇦

    • @rosskious7084
      @rosskious7084 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They already allocated funding for these.

  • @AndreaDoesYoga
    @AndreaDoesYoga 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Impressive technology, hope it brings peace soon🕊️

    • @ikman4006
      @ikman4006 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sending Ukraine weapons only prolongs the conflict, We’re having a proxy war with Russia to play them against their own people and feed our military industrial complex.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Peace Through Earth." - Farty-five, 2024

    • @balazsszekely2132
      @balazsszekely2132 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Peace? It will just make it worse

    • @davidwee130
      @davidwee130 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Brings everything soon

  • @lallen3327
    @lallen3327 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now I want to buy one. What's the financing like on one of those? Can it fit in a 2 car garage?

  • @rrostoyarik8579
    @rrostoyarik8579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Americans talking about flexibility, maneuverability, blah blah
    Guys, its dirt cheap rocket at a price of a used pick up truck, not a million dollar one. And theres bunch of em - thats all we need over there, now ship some numbers for gods sake.

  • @---sf4hi
    @---sf4hi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Can you guys please only use the metric system like KM not Miles because they are confusing

    • @crhu319
      @crhu319 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is lying propaganda only for Americans to believe.

    • @frankd8957
      @frankd8957 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Multiply miles by 1.6 for KM.

  • @Le_Dislike_Button
    @Le_Dislike_Button 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    game changing wunderwaffe number what? I lost count

    • @markryall6243
      @markryall6243 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The US has retired weapons sitting in scrapyards that could have been given to Ukraine to beat Russia and quickly. US has hundreds of retired F16s sitting in scrapyards and it has 1500 himars which are retiring this year. NATO doesn't want Ukraine to beat Russia outright it would mean regime change o rmaybe nuclear war. Personally I think we should of flattened Russia years ago. They are a third rate military

    • @Le_Dislike_Button
      @Le_Dislike_Button 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markryall6243 cute, but Pentagon experts don't paint such a rosy picture with regards to current state of US stockpiles. that is according to an October 2023 CNN article titled "US eyes weapons stockpiles as concern grows about supporting both Ukraine and Israel’s wars". Mind toning down your schizophrenia a little bit?

  • @6896franksanc
    @6896franksanc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting lots of technical info and costs info and I guess it is good to have in our arsenal but no mention who dies when it goes boom.

  • @AwesomesMan
    @AwesomesMan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well spoken guy

  • @waseq117
    @waseq117 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Hope to see some great news using the GLSDB soon...

  • @Khujandiho
    @Khujandiho 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    this is nothing but advertising for GLSDB

    • @kalleranta2260
      @kalleranta2260 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's a win-win.

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What good is this advertising supposed to do? You can't just buy such a GLSDB in a store. And the people in the US government or other governments don't buy weapons based on TH-cam clips.

    • @kealeradecal6091
      @kealeradecal6091 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And Russia is the best advertiser of US weapons

  • @rockerxxx69
    @rockerxxx69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is a game changer, for sure, this time it´s a game changer

  • @alisetan26
    @alisetan26 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gotta test them all...

  • @rojavabashur6455
    @rojavabashur6455 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Its not a US weapon, its a swedish weapon

    • @jerseyshoredroneservices225
      @jerseyshoredroneservices225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Saab/Boeing
      I believe the rocket motors and SDB's are coming from the US.

  • @geraldstokes5661
    @geraldstokes5661 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It's nice to see happiness in the darkness of war

    • @The_Divergent
      @The_Divergent 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TF???
      New imported weapon get handed out to a child(ukraine) VS Rusia, and you call that happiness??
      Ukraine being used by US as wartoy