The Complete Story of Pharaoh - The King of Egypt: An Ancient Exodus Mystery

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @BibleUnbound
    @BibleUnbound  ปีที่แล้ว +7

    🚀Don't harden your hearts in this comment section like Pharaoh did, or the Israelites in the wilderness (Hebrews 3:15).
    🚀ALSO don't forget: Bible Unbound is supported by Patreon: www.patreon.com/Bibleunbound

  • @Twiceborn_by_grace
    @Twiceborn_by_grace ปีที่แล้ว +20

    When I was in the 7th grade, we were studying Egypt and when the teacher started the movie The Prince of Egypt, I remember sighing and saying, “I guess this is the closest I’ll get to learning about God in public school.”

    • @Sora._Cloud
      @Sora._Cloud ปีที่แล้ว +1

      7th grade watching movies in school sound like a first world country 😂

    • @gianni206
      @gianni206 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We did the same when learning about Israel in religion class. Boy did i take that for granted.

  • @doctwiggenberry5324
    @doctwiggenberry5324 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What beautiful artwork. It adds so much to the story. Thanks for this and all productions.

  • @psalmsByGod.
    @psalmsByGod. ปีที่แล้ว +2

    INSANELY GREAT VIDEO 🤯❤️

  • @historian254
    @historian254 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm Kenyan reformed Christian and I loved it. Can't wait for the Moses video.

    • @dalpaengi
      @dalpaengi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      May God bless you.

  • @jodyel
    @jodyel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amenhotep II is the Exodus Pharaoh. See this video by the Expedition Bible channel called "The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!" His mummy is in the National Museum of Egyptian Civilization. We can see the body of the Pharaoh that dealt with Moses. Truly fascinating.

  • @JC4LYF
    @JC4LYF ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My heart is unbound, not hardened like Pharaoh's, a heart of flesh, not of stone.

  • @dekelpolak4190
    @dekelpolak4190 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whom Can We Trust If No One Is Trustworthy?
    One of my favorite quips from Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Tom Sawyer is when Tom is defined as “a glittering hero…the pet of the old, the envy of the young,” and there were “some that believed that he would be President, yet, if he escaped hanging.” With these few words, Twain captured the essence of leadership in our world. Those who get to the top are the fiercest, most determined, and most ruthless. Today, the latter quality has become so intense that we can no longer believe our leaders, and certainly not trust them to have our best interest in mind.
    I am not accusing any leader in particular, or even leaders as a whole. It is simply that in an egoistic world, where people vie to topple one another on their way to the top, the one at the top is clearly the one who trampled over and knocked down more people than anyone else. Concisely, to get to the top in an egoistic world you have to be the biggest egoist.
    So how do we know whom to trust? We don’t know and we cannot know. All we know is that we are in the dark.
    In a culture of unhinged selfishness, any conspiracy theory seems reasonable, while truth is nowhere to be found. When every person who says or writes something is trying to promote some hidden agenda, you have no way of knowing who is right, what really happened, or if anything happened at all.
    The only way to get some clarity in the news and goodwill from our leaders is to say “Enough!” to our current system and build something entirely independent. The guiding principle of such a system should be “information only,” no commentary. Commentary means that information has already been skewed. Information means saying only what happened, as much as possible, not why, and not who is to blame and who we should praise.
    Concurrently, we must begin a comprehensive process of self-teaching. We have to know not only what is happening, but why we skew and distort everything. In other words, we have to know about human nature and how it inherently presents matters according to its own subjective view, which caters to one’s own interest. To “clear” ourselves from that deformity, we must learn how to rise above our personal interest and develop an equally favorable attitude toward others. This is our only guarantee that our interpretation of things will be even and correct.
    Once we achieve such an attitude, we will discover that the bad things we see in our world reflect our own, internal wickedness. Our ill-will toward others creates a world where ill-will governs, and so the world is filled with wickedness and cruelty. Therefore, all we need in order to create positive leadership-and to generally eliminate ill-will from the world-is to generate goodwill within us. When we nurture goodwill toward others, we will fill the world with goodwill. As a result, the world will fill with kindness and compassion. By changing ourselves, we will create a world that is opposite from the world we have created through our desires to govern, patronize, and often destroy other people.

    • @doctwiggenberry5324
      @doctwiggenberry5324 ปีที่แล้ว

      our leaders are no longer leaders, they appoint groups who take the heat for failed leadership. Mark Twain was so astute in his ability to put truth into words.

  • @gianni206
    @gianni206 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You forgot the most interesting part:
    Ramses died of hardened arteries... and arteries are connected to the heart, so technically... he died of a hard heart.

  • @christaylor6654
    @christaylor6654 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ramses was not the pharaoh of exodus. The store house city was named Ramses as a point of reference just as Saigon was changed to Ho Chi Minh city. It was called Ramses just so the readers would have known it by its current name

  • @SamuelOmondi-ep2im
    @SamuelOmondi-ep2im 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮

  • @SamuelStudio_
    @SamuelStudio_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🔥📖🙏

  • @mattparr3038
    @mattparr3038 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When it spoke of pharaohs heart hardening, it was a prediction. That is how he would react towards God's message. God didn't cause it harden.

  • @mark98115
    @mark98115 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The is the story you read in the bible and then there is the truth.
    Truth was probably inverse of that story.
    They were probably banished from Egypt.

  • @flunder50
    @flunder50 ปีที่แล้ว

    In Genesis the territory of dan is mentioned. We all know he wasn't even born yet. Names of territories are sometimes called by its more popular name based on when it was written. Ramses being mentioned doesn't mean Rameses was Pharoah at the time. All of the cartwheeling and back flips you have to perform with the 1 kings text to make it fit the late date are all speculation. The literal reading has it in 1446 when amenhotep II was Pharoah. You also have to consider all of the other aspects of the exodus story. When could a Hebrew be vizier in Egypt? Who's the Pharaoh's daughter that adopted Moses? Was there a Pharoah, who wasn't the exodus Pharoah, that served 40 years while Moses was in midian? Did that Pharaoh's first born succeed him? Did his army drown in the red sea? Etc. These factors make it impossible to be Rameses. So you have to completely ignore God's Word to fit what makes more sense because the text mentioned a city named Rameses.

    • @JaredAllen651
      @JaredAllen651 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree, I think it was amenhotep the third because the story of the biblical pharaoh lines up completely with him and he is close to the written date in the Bible

    • @501Mobius
      @501Mobius 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All the cartwheels in the world won't make 1 Kings 6:1 get to the correct date of Rameses II.
      Read the Amarna Letter EA151 it mentioned Danuna which was a town far to the north in Canaan.
      If 1446 Exodus Othniel would have been a Judge serving pharaoh as the Amarna Letters show.
      Rameses II first born died before him. Ex.11.5 It says the firstborn *of pharaoh*, it doesn't say pharaoh.
      The recent discovery of the Jerub-baal/Gideon ostraca dated to 1100BC pushes forward the date of Judge Jephthah to 994 BC. Who stated that the year before the Conquest was 300 years prior. Or 1294 BC not 1407 BC.