Ghair muqallid in what sense.i hope you aren't trying to make haram and halal by yourself like a scholar as that's haram.if you mean ghair muqallid in the sense of you don't follow a madhab but rather trusted scholars then there is nothing wrong with it.
@@Xenor999WE SALAFI SUNNI ATHARI AHLUL HADITH MUSLIMS STRICTLY NEVERRR DO TAQLEED OR BLIND FOLLOWING of anybody except MUHAMMAD SALLALLAHUALAIHIWASALLAM
@@Xenor999*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_* *DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!* *ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!* *FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS* *_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_* *_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_* *_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
@@Xenor999*_It is FARD/obligatory upon The True Muslim to affirm the Asma/Names & Sifat/Attributes of Allah, without committing:1️⃣Tahreef:To attach figurative & metaphorical meanings to the attributes of Allah, while denying the apparent meaning of the attribute2️⃣Ta'teel:Leaving & vacating🔥Negation/Denial of His Attributes & denial of His Self & Being. Denial of the real meaning proved by the Quran & Sunnah🔥Tahreef includes Tateel but Ta'teel does not include Tahreef🔥There are 2 types of Tateel:❌️1)Absolute Tateel: Which the Jahamiyyah committed:Denying all attributes of Allah❌️2)Partial Tateel:Which the Ash’ariyya & maturidiyya commit:Denying all attributes of Allah by Tahreef & affirming only 7 (Ashariyah) & 8 (Maturidiyah) attributes of Allah3️⃣Takyeef:To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are such & such or to put questions as to the state of His Attributes. The term "beghair Takyeef' means that the AhlusSunnah deny having knowledge of Allah's condition as Allah alone knows the state of His Self & His Attributes4️⃣Tamtheel: To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are like the Attributes of His creatures5️⃣Tafweed: To have faith that it’s not the apparent meaning which is meant but only Allah alone knows the meanings of the attributes6️⃣Tajseem:To have faith that Allah has a body. (We as AhlusSunnah neither affirm nor negate the attribute of body, since nothing has come in Quran & Sunnah concerning it & Aqeeda is a matter purely based on Revelation/Wahi as mentioned by Shaykh IbnUthaymeen RAHIMAHULLAH & Shaykhul Islam IbnTaymiyyah RAHIMAHULLAH✅So we do NOT affirm that He has a body while affirming his attributes). The Salaf understood the meanings of the passages of the Quran & the Sunnah & proved these meanings in the favour of Allah. However they would submit the knowledge of the reality (how of the attribute) To Allah. Imam Malik RAHIMAHULLAH was asked about the state of Istawa (Rising Above) of Allah on the Throne, he said Istawa is known but ‘how’ He ascended is unknown. The code of conduct of the AhlusSunnah wal Jamah is as the clear Quran’s verse:“There is nothing like Him.”-Quran (112:4)✔️The correct Aqeeda therefore, is NOT that the Attributes are completely denied as is the way of the Mutazila🔥(A Deviant sect), NOR is it to try to prove them completely as is the way of the Mumathila🔥(Another deviant sect✏Rather the true Aqeeda is to make an affirmation of the Attributes without similitudes/likeness✅SALAFIYYAH✅️_* *Breaking down DEVIANT AQEEDAH OF SUFI/deobandis/asharis/matureedis🛐❌1️⃣They claim to follow imam AbuHanifa infact they follow him only in fiqhi issues, so they can fight with us that fold hands below navel or dont do Raful-Yadayen2️⃣The aqeedah of sufi/ashari/maturidi/deobandi is of sufi🔥WAllahu Alam from where they got this Shirk belief🔥Their aqeedah is of Mohammad bin Mohammad matrudi🔥If you know that matrudi is the fiqh who are wrong in the tawheed asma-wa-siffat of Allah.. They don't believe in every names of Allah, holding on only 7-8🔥They were wrong before & they're still wrong❌3️⃣Whilst in performing deeds they follow Sufi's 4 sub categories qadiri→chishti→naqshabandi→suharwardi👎🏻They're undercover Sufi🛐❌4️⃣SUFI/ASHARI/MATUREEDI/Deobandi claim that they follow 4 imams, but they follow imam matrudi in aqeedah & in fiqh they follow imam AbuHanifa, they leave 3 Imams as if they never existed!*_ *_WHERE IS ALLAH⁉️ImamAbuHanifah☝🏻AbuMutiAlBalkhi reported:I asked Imam AbuHanifah about a person who says:I do NOT know whether my Rab (Allah) is above the heavens or on earth⁉️AbuHanifah said:A person who makes such a statement becomes an apostate because Allah, the Exalted says:The Merciful has ascended above THE ARSH & THE ARSH OF ALLAH IS ABOVE HIS HEAVENS🔥I ALSO ASKED ABUHANIFAH🔥What if such a person admits, Allah is above His Arsh BUT EXCLAIMS:I do not know whether His Arsh is above the heavens or on earth‼️AbuHanifah responded🗣If he denies that the Arsh is above the heavens, he is an apostate‼️If the person apostatizes by saying that he did not know where is the ARSH of Allah, then by right a person who denies the Loftiness of Allah altogether is definitely worse than an apostate🔥ImamMalik🔥Abdullah binNafi reported:MalikBinAnas said:ALLAH IS ABOVE THE HEAVENS BUT HIS KNOWLEDGE encompasses everything. NOTHING ESCAPES HIS KNOWLEDGE🔥ImamShafi said:THE CREED which I hold is the same creed the MUSLIMS BEFORE me were holding, namely, the Testimony of Faith:There is no god worthy of being worshipped except Allah, that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah & that Allah is ABOVE HIS ARSH, above the heavens. He descends to the lowest heaven whenever He wishes📚ImamBinKhuzaimah a SHAFI himself said:Whoever DOES NOT BELIEVE that Allah is above His ARSH☝🏻Above His 7 HEAVENS & THAT HE IS SEPARATE from His creatures, is a KAFIR🔥Such person must be ordered to repent & disavow his belief or else he must be beheaded and thrown on a garbage dump so that neither Ahlul-Qiblah nor Ahludth-dthimmah be annoyed by the foul odour of his carcass🔥AbuBakr MuhammadatTamimi, a Shafi'ite imam of Naisabur said:"I do not pray behind a person who denies the attributes of Allah & does not recognise that Allah is above His Arsh🔥ImamAhmad🔥He was asked: Is Allah above His Arsh, above the 7th heaven, separate from His creatures, & is His knowledge & power encompassing everything everywhere⁉️He replied:'Certainly, He is above His Arsh & NOTHING escapes His knowledge. All of the above show that the entire Muslim ummah, in the past & present, is in unison regarding the belief in the Loftiness & SUPREMACY OF ALLAH THE EXALTED_*
I am not Hanafi. But I have questions about what Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen may Allah have mercy on him has said. There is no evidence that Rasool Allah Salaam on him stopped at the end of Fatiha long enough to allow the followers to finish Fatiha. Nor did Sihaba say that we used to stop after Fatiha to let the followers finish their Fatiha. So, there seems to be no evidence (Nus) for Imam stopping after every verse of Al-Fatiha or pausing long enough at the end of Fatiha so that followers may recite their own Fatiha. If a person joins Jama'a after Fatiha was finished, he would be reciting by cutting the Imam's recitation. If a person joins just before the Jama'a goes to Rako'o, he would not be able to recite Fatiha. I know that these are exceptional cases and do not contradict the order for reciting Fatiha. But the open door for more questions. Imam Malik and Sheikh Al-Albani May Allah have Mercy of both of them, along with many others, were of the opinion that in the Salaah when Fatiha is recited aloud (Jahr) the recitation of Imam is sufficient, because the followers are listening. But in silent (sirri) Salaah reciting is an obligation.
The imam doesn't have to stop for you to read surah fatiha. And the exceptons you gave also apply to when the imam is silent. if you join in just before rukoo, its the same if the imam recites out loud or is silent. And the evidence uthaymeen used for you still having to recite surah fatiha even if the imam is reciting out laud is this hadith: صلَّى رسولُ اللَّهِ صلَّى اللَّهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ الصُّبحَ فَثقُلَتْ علَيهِ القراءةُ فلمَّا انصرَفَ قالَ: إنِّي أراكُم تقرَءونَ وراءَ إمامِكُم؟ قالَ: قُلنا: يا رسولَ اللَّهِ إي واللَّهِ. قالَ: فلا تَفعلوا إلَّا بأمِّ القرآنِ فإنَّهُ لا صَلاةَ لمن لم يَقرأْ بِها “THE MESSENGER OF ALLÂH, صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ, WAS PERFORMING SALÂT, WHEN THE RECITATION BECAME DIFFICULT FOR HIM IN HIS RECITATION IN FAJR, AND WHEN HE FINISHED HE SAID: ‘PERHAPS YOU RECITE BEHIND YOUR IMÂM?’ THEY SAID: ‘YES.’ HE SAID: ‘DO NOT DO THAT, EXCEPT FOR THE MOTHER OF THE QUR’ÂN (I.E. AL-FÂTIHAH), FOR THERE IS NO PRAYER FOR THE ONE WHO DOES NOT RECITE IT.’” Narrated by Al-Bukhâri in “Juz’ Fil-Qirâ’ah Khalf al-Imâm”, At-Tirmithî, Ibn Hibbân and others. This Hadîth is weak, and was declared as such by Imâm Ahmad and others. Al-Albânî has a lengthy discussion clarifying its weakness in “Dha’îf Sunan Abî Dâwûd”, Vol. 1/317-324. And it was weakened by Shaykh Sulaymân Ibn Nâsir al-‘Alwân, and I asked our Shaykh, Dr. Mâhir Ibn Yâsîn al-Fahl about it being weak, and he approved of that judgement. Likewise, I asked Shaykhs, Dr. Ibrâhîm Ibn ‘Abdillâh al-Lâhim and Târiq Ibn ‘Awdhillâh and they both rejected that these are from the words of the Prophet, صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ.
8 หลายเดือนก่อน
@@TheTrueSalafiyyahso it is better to not recite al fatihah behind the Imam ?
Brother the matter is simple: 1) Al-Fatihah behind Imam is obligatory due to the Hadith which states there is no prayer for the one who does not recite the Opening of the Book (ie Al-Fatihah) 2) The Verse {And when the Qur’aan is being recited then listen to it and remain silent in order that you may receive mercy} is general because we find another Hadith where the Sahaabah were reciting the Qur’an with a loud voice so the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم advised them of how to recite properly while another is reciting. 3) The next Verse after the Verse above states {And remember your Lord in yourselves, humbly and fearfully and without loudness of words in the mornings and evenings and do not be from the heedless} This Verse is the specific evidence which shows that Al-Fatihah, therefore, is to be recited quietly behind the Imam. 4) When reciting Al-Fatihah behind the Imam, one should be wary of preceding him in recitation as the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said the Imam has been appointed to be followed 5) If the Imam goes into Rukoo’ before you finish Al-Fatihah you need to finish Al-Fatihah then join the Rukoo’ as the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said that whatever you find you should pray it and whatever you miss then make it up; in such a case, one would have found the time to commence Al-Fatihah and thus needs to complete it and if he is delayed in Rukoo’ with Imam no problem because he صلى الله عليه وسلم said and whatever you miss, make it up, so you just catch up after Al-Fatihah.
@@TheTrueSalafiyyahso do you have to recite surah al Fatiha during loud prayers behind imam or not? And if you join the congregation after the imam recited al Fatiha, do you recite it? What if you joined the congregation just when the imam goes into ruku position?
there are difference of opinion. The opinion from this video is the one Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen holds. There are other opinions like the opinion of sheikh ul islam ibn taymiyyah: Another argument made for this opinion is what was articulated by Shaykhul-Islâm Ibn Taymiyyah when he said: “And had the recitation been obligatory during the aloud Salawât upon the one being lead, one of two things would need to be done: Either he would have to recite with the Imâm, or it would be obligatory upon the Imâm to remain silent for him so that he may recite. And we don’t know of any dispute amongst the Scholars concerning it not being obligatory upon the Imâm to be silent so the one being lead may recite Al-Fâtihah or anything else. And his recitation with him (i.e. the Imâm) is forbidden in the Book and the Sunnah, so it is confirmed that it is not obligatory upon him (to recite Al-Fâtihah) during the aloud (prayers). Rather we say: had the recitation of the one being lead as well as him listening during the aloud (prayers) been recommended, it would have been recommended for the Imâm to be silent so the one being lead could recite. And it is not recommended for the Imâm to remain silent in order for the one being lead to recite, according to the overwhelming majority of the Scholars; and this is the Math’hab of Abû Hanîfah Mâlik, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and others.” [17] thesunnahstudies.wordpress.com/2021/10/23/ruling-on-reciting-al-fatihah-behind-the-imam/
No the imam after reciting Al Fatiha he should be silent for a couple of seconds (short time) and then he should recite the second surah. The being silent part is for the imam not you (the people led by the imam). So after the imam recites Fatiha you then recite Fatiha silently even if the imam started reciting a second surah.
I thought you didn’t need to recite Al-Fatiha in jamaa’a as the Imans says it? If you recite it after the imam then you won’t be able to hear the ayah. I know you say Bismillah arrahman ar Raheem in between which is when the imam is silent for a moment but not full Al-Fatiha
@@MYownforever1 I used to think that too but what I now believe is that your recite fatiha as well. If you didn’t know before there is no sin on you and your salahs at accepted in sha Allah because you did not know.
Just move your lips and recite Al Fatiha silent behind the imam. This way you are still silent and listening, while reciting. It wil be recorded, and your tongue wil bare witness. Its a win win situation in sha Allah. Allahu 'Alem.
No, there must be sound when you recite fatiha such that if someone would put the ear close to your mouth, they can hear. You dont just move lips with no sound
Imam is the guarantor of the salah. Therefore, if the imam reciting Fatiha out aloud, we don't have to do that. Because, if we recite fatiha along with the imam or imam pause for too long, then it'll harm the beauty of salah in my opinion.
so the Hanafis salah is invalid according to his understanding of this Hadith, why does Allah SWT say in the Quran; فَٱقْرَءُوا۟ مَا تَيَسَّرَ مِنَ ٱلْقُرْءَانِ ۚ Read from whatever you can from the Quran (Muzzammil) We should not take this Hadith litteral, if you have studied the field and principles of Hadith some Hadith. Hadith is divided in many categories (not according to authencity) but in the meaning and the language, and according to Imam Abu Hanifah (rh) madhhab we dont recite anything behind the imam
It's a matter of difference, Allah knows best who is correct, the person who is correct receives 2 rewards whereas the person who has erred receives 1, as the Messenger صَلّى الله عليه وسلّم in a Hadith. These are matters wherein it permissible to have difference of opinion as both parties tried their level best to get to the truth, so it is not permissible to say this view is incorrect and your salah is in valid. However in matters such as Aqidah, difference of opinion is not allowed as this is to foundation of the religion. والله أعلم
All evidence of the hanafi madhhab on this subject is either weak or general, as in the following verse: “When the Quran is recited, listen to it attentively and be silent, so you may be shown mercy.” Araf 204 * A person can also listen to the Quran by reciting the Fatiha behind the imam. This verse only orders to listened to the Qur'an Or Ahadith like: “Whoever prays behind the imam, the imam's reading is also his reading.” Weak hadith.
Alhamdulillah, I'm Ahlul Hadith, Ghair Muqallid.
Ghair muqallid in what sense.i hope you aren't trying to make haram and halal by yourself like a scholar as that's haram.if you mean ghair muqallid in the sense of you don't follow a madhab but rather trusted scholars then there is nothing wrong with it.
@@Xenor999WE SALAFI SUNNI ATHARI AHLUL HADITH MUSLIMS STRICTLY NEVERRR DO TAQLEED OR BLIND FOLLOWING of anybody except MUHAMMAD SALLALLAHUALAIHIWASALLAM
@@Xenor999*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
*ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!*
*FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS*
*_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_*
*_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
@@Xenor999*_It is FARD/obligatory upon The True Muslim to affirm the Asma/Names & Sifat/Attributes of Allah, without committing:1️⃣Tahreef:To attach figurative & metaphorical meanings to the attributes of Allah, while denying the apparent meaning of the attribute2️⃣Ta'teel:Leaving & vacating🔥Negation/Denial of His Attributes & denial of His Self & Being. Denial of the real meaning proved by the Quran & Sunnah🔥Tahreef includes Tateel but Ta'teel does not include Tahreef🔥There are 2 types of Tateel:❌️1)Absolute Tateel: Which the Jahamiyyah committed:Denying all attributes of Allah❌️2)Partial Tateel:Which the Ash’ariyya & maturidiyya commit:Denying all attributes of Allah by Tahreef & affirming only 7 (Ashariyah) & 8 (Maturidiyah) attributes of Allah3️⃣Takyeef:To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are such & such or to put questions as to the state of His Attributes. The term "beghair Takyeef' means that the AhlusSunnah deny having knowledge of Allah's condition as Allah alone knows the state of His Self & His Attributes4️⃣Tamtheel: To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are like the Attributes of His creatures5️⃣Tafweed: To have faith that it’s not the apparent meaning which is meant but only Allah alone knows the meanings of the attributes6️⃣Tajseem:To have faith that Allah has a body. (We as AhlusSunnah neither affirm nor negate the attribute of body, since nothing has come in Quran & Sunnah concerning it & Aqeeda is a matter purely based on Revelation/Wahi as mentioned by Shaykh IbnUthaymeen RAHIMAHULLAH & Shaykhul Islam IbnTaymiyyah RAHIMAHULLAH✅So we do NOT affirm that He has a body while affirming his attributes). The Salaf understood the meanings of the passages of the Quran & the Sunnah & proved these meanings in the favour of Allah. However they would submit the knowledge of the reality (how of the attribute) To Allah. Imam Malik RAHIMAHULLAH was asked about the state of Istawa (Rising Above) of Allah on the Throne, he said Istawa is known but ‘how’ He ascended is unknown. The code of conduct of the AhlusSunnah wal Jamah is as the clear Quran’s verse:“There is nothing like Him.”-Quran (112:4)✔️The correct Aqeeda therefore, is NOT that the Attributes are completely denied as is the way of the Mutazila🔥(A Deviant sect), NOR is it to try to prove them completely as is the way of the Mumathila🔥(Another deviant sect✏Rather the true Aqeeda is to make an affirmation of the Attributes without similitudes/likeness✅SALAFIYYAH✅️_*
*Breaking down DEVIANT AQEEDAH OF SUFI/deobandis/asharis/matureedis🛐❌1️⃣They claim to follow imam AbuHanifa infact they follow him only in fiqhi issues, so they can fight with us that fold hands below navel or dont do Raful-Yadayen2️⃣The aqeedah of sufi/ashari/maturidi/deobandi is of sufi🔥WAllahu Alam from where they got this Shirk belief🔥Their aqeedah is of Mohammad bin Mohammad matrudi🔥If you know that matrudi is the fiqh who are wrong in the tawheed asma-wa-siffat of Allah.. They don't believe in every names of Allah, holding on only 7-8🔥They were wrong before & they're still wrong❌3️⃣Whilst in performing deeds they follow Sufi's 4 sub categories qadiri→chishti→naqshabandi→suharwardi👎🏻They're undercover Sufi🛐❌4️⃣SUFI/ASHARI/MATUREEDI/Deobandi claim that they follow 4 imams, but they follow imam matrudi in aqeedah & in fiqh they follow imam AbuHanifa, they leave 3 Imams as if they never existed!*_
*_WHERE IS ALLAH⁉️ImamAbuHanifah☝🏻AbuMutiAlBalkhi reported:I asked Imam AbuHanifah about a person who says:I do NOT know whether my Rab (Allah) is above the heavens or on earth⁉️AbuHanifah said:A person who makes such a statement becomes an apostate because Allah, the Exalted says:The Merciful has ascended above THE ARSH & THE ARSH OF ALLAH IS ABOVE HIS HEAVENS🔥I ALSO ASKED ABUHANIFAH🔥What if such a person admits, Allah is above His Arsh BUT EXCLAIMS:I do not know whether His Arsh is above the heavens or on earth‼️AbuHanifah responded🗣If he denies that the Arsh is above the heavens, he is an apostate‼️If the person apostatizes by saying that he did not know where is the ARSH of Allah, then by right a person who denies the Loftiness of Allah altogether is definitely worse than an apostate🔥ImamMalik🔥Abdullah binNafi reported:MalikBinAnas said:ALLAH IS ABOVE THE HEAVENS BUT HIS KNOWLEDGE encompasses everything. NOTHING ESCAPES HIS KNOWLEDGE🔥ImamShafi said:THE CREED which I hold is the same creed the MUSLIMS BEFORE me were holding, namely, the Testimony of Faith:There is no god worthy of being worshipped except Allah, that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah & that Allah is ABOVE HIS ARSH, above the heavens. He descends to the lowest heaven whenever He wishes📚ImamBinKhuzaimah a SHAFI himself said:Whoever DOES NOT BELIEVE that Allah is above His ARSH☝🏻Above His 7 HEAVENS & THAT HE IS SEPARATE from His creatures, is a KAFIR🔥Such person must be ordered to repent & disavow his belief or else he must be beheaded and thrown on a garbage dump so that neither Ahlul-Qiblah nor Ahludth-dthimmah be annoyed by the foul odour of his carcass🔥AbuBakr MuhammadatTamimi, a Shafi'ite imam of Naisabur said:"I do not pray behind a person who denies the attributes of Allah & does not recognise that Allah is above His Arsh🔥ImamAhmad🔥He was asked: Is Allah above His Arsh, above the 7th heaven, separate from His creatures, & is His knowledge & power encompassing everything everywhere⁉️He replied:'Certainly, He is above His Arsh & NOTHING escapes His knowledge. All of the above show that the entire Muslim ummah, in the past & present, is in unison regarding the belief in the Loftiness & SUPREMACY OF ALLAH THE EXALTED_*
Typing error on the thumbnail which should be addressed, otherwise the content is crystal clear 👍
Thank you for the information, JazakAllah khair
Would the channel owner consider putting sunglasses on the Ulama instead of just a black bar? 💯
Maybe but maybe it is disrepectfull. Idk. Black bars have kinda become the standar. It would look kinda cool tho 😂
@@TheTrueSalafiyyah
lool it's not disrespectful until someone reprimands you for it - that's my philosophy
جزاك الله خيرًا
Akhi will u upload videos regularly?
Insha Allah, if Allah allows me to
Allahuma barik
Interesting, I thought this was only a Shafi’i thing. Is this also a Hanbali opinion or did the Shaykh agree with the Shafi’is on this matter?
It's the Shafi'i view, not Hanbali. He just considered their view to be the rajih.
akhi there is a mistake ib the thumbnaul
please inform me.
@@TheTrueSalafiyyah it says being unstead of behind
I am not Hanafi. But I have questions about what Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen may Allah have mercy on him has said.
There is no evidence that Rasool Allah Salaam on him stopped at the end of Fatiha long enough to allow the followers to finish Fatiha. Nor did Sihaba say that we used to stop after Fatiha to let the followers finish their Fatiha.
So, there seems to be no evidence (Nus) for Imam stopping after every verse of Al-Fatiha or pausing long enough at the end of Fatiha so that followers may recite their own Fatiha.
If a person joins Jama'a after Fatiha was finished, he would be reciting by cutting the Imam's recitation. If a person joins just before the Jama'a goes to Rako'o, he would not be able to recite Fatiha.
I know that these are exceptional cases and do not contradict the order for reciting Fatiha. But the open door for more questions.
Imam Malik and Sheikh Al-Albani May Allah have Mercy of both of them, along with many others, were of the opinion that in the Salaah when Fatiha is recited aloud (Jahr) the recitation of Imam is sufficient, because the followers are listening. But in silent (sirri) Salaah reciting is an obligation.
The imam doesn't have to stop for you to read surah fatiha. And the exceptons you gave also apply to when the imam is silent. if you join in just before rukoo, its the same if the imam recites out loud or is silent.
And the evidence uthaymeen used for you still having to recite surah fatiha even if the imam is reciting out laud is this hadith:
صلَّى رسولُ اللَّهِ صلَّى اللَّهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ الصُّبحَ فَثقُلَتْ علَيهِ القراءةُ فلمَّا انصرَفَ قالَ: إنِّي أراكُم تقرَءونَ وراءَ إمامِكُم؟ قالَ: قُلنا: يا رسولَ اللَّهِ إي واللَّهِ. قالَ: فلا تَفعلوا إلَّا بأمِّ القرآنِ فإنَّهُ لا صَلاةَ لمن لم يَقرأْ بِها
“THE MESSENGER OF ALLÂH, صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ, WAS PERFORMING SALÂT, WHEN THE RECITATION BECAME DIFFICULT FOR HIM IN HIS RECITATION IN FAJR, AND WHEN HE FINISHED HE SAID: ‘PERHAPS YOU RECITE BEHIND YOUR IMÂM?’ THEY SAID: ‘YES.’ HE SAID: ‘DO NOT DO THAT, EXCEPT FOR THE MOTHER OF THE QUR’ÂN (I.E. AL-FÂTIHAH), FOR THERE IS NO PRAYER FOR THE ONE WHO DOES NOT RECITE IT.’”
Narrated by Al-Bukhâri in “Juz’ Fil-Qirâ’ah Khalf al-Imâm”, At-Tirmithî, Ibn Hibbân and others. This Hadîth is weak, and was declared as such by Imâm Ahmad and others. Al-Albânî has a lengthy discussion clarifying its weakness in “Dha’îf Sunan Abî Dâwûd”, Vol. 1/317-324. And it was weakened by Shaykh Sulaymân Ibn Nâsir al-‘Alwân, and I asked our Shaykh, Dr. Mâhir Ibn Yâsîn al-Fahl about it being weak, and he approved of that judgement. Likewise, I asked Shaykhs, Dr. Ibrâhîm Ibn ‘Abdillâh al-Lâhim and Târiq Ibn ‘Awdhillâh and they both rejected that these are from the words of the Prophet, صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ.
@@TheTrueSalafiyyahso it is better to not recite al fatihah behind the Imam ?
@@TheTrueSalafiyyah
Akhi, recheck the references you gave, it mentions the names of some deviants.
Brother the matter is simple:
1) Al-Fatihah behind Imam is obligatory due to the Hadith which states there is no prayer for the one who does not recite the Opening of the Book (ie Al-Fatihah)
2) The Verse {And when the Qur’aan is being recited then listen to it and remain silent in order that you may receive mercy} is general because we find another Hadith where the Sahaabah were reciting the Qur’an with a loud voice so the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم advised them of how to recite properly while another is reciting.
3) The next Verse after the Verse above states {And remember your Lord in yourselves, humbly and fearfully and without loudness of words in the mornings and evenings and do not be from the heedless}
This Verse is the specific evidence which shows that Al-Fatihah, therefore, is to be recited quietly behind the Imam.
4) When reciting Al-Fatihah behind the Imam, one should be wary of preceding him in recitation as the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said the Imam has been appointed to be followed
5) If the Imam goes into Rukoo’ before you finish Al-Fatihah you need to finish Al-Fatihah then join the Rukoo’ as the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said that whatever you find you should pray it and whatever you miss then make it up; in such a case, one would have found the time to commence Al-Fatihah and thus needs to complete it and if he is delayed in Rukoo’ with Imam no problem because he صلى الله عليه وسلم said and whatever you miss, make it up, so you just catch up after Al-Fatihah.
@@TheTrueSalafiyyahso do you have to recite surah al Fatiha during loud prayers behind imam or not?
And if you join the congregation after the imam recited al Fatiha, do you recite it?
What if you joined the congregation just when the imam goes into ruku position?
I thought you didn’t need to recite Al-Fatiha I’m jamaa’a unless it’s dhuhr or asr?
there are difference of opinion. The opinion from this video is the one Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen holds.
There are other opinions like the opinion of sheikh ul islam ibn taymiyyah:
Another argument made for this opinion is what was articulated by Shaykhul-Islâm Ibn Taymiyyah when he said: “And had the recitation been obligatory during the aloud Salawât upon the one being lead, one of two things would need to be done: Either he would have to recite with the Imâm, or it would be obligatory upon the Imâm to remain silent for him so that he may recite. And we don’t know of any dispute amongst the Scholars concerning it not being obligatory upon the Imâm to be silent so the one being lead may recite Al-Fâtihah or anything else. And his recitation with him (i.e. the Imâm) is forbidden in the Book and the Sunnah, so it is confirmed that it is not obligatory upon him (to recite Al-Fâtihah) during the aloud (prayers). Rather we say: had the recitation of the one being lead as well as him listening during the aloud (prayers) been recommended, it would have been recommended for the Imâm to be silent so the one being lead could recite. And it is not recommended for the Imâm to remain silent in order for the one being lead to recite, according to the overwhelming majority of the Scholars; and this is the Math’hab of Abû Hanîfah Mâlik, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and others.” [17]
thesunnahstudies.wordpress.com/2021/10/23/ruling-on-reciting-al-fatihah-behind-the-imam/
So you should be silent for a while, then recite Surah Fatiha?
No the imam after reciting Al Fatiha he should be silent for a couple of seconds (short time) and then he should recite the second surah. The being silent part is for the imam not you (the people led by the imam). So after the imam recites Fatiha you then recite Fatiha silently even if the imam started reciting a second surah.
I thought you didn’t need to recite Al-Fatiha in jamaa’a as the Imans says it? If you recite it after the imam then you won’t be able to hear the ayah. I know you say Bismillah arrahman ar Raheem in between which is when the imam is silent for a moment but not full Al-Fatiha
@@MYownforever1 I used to think that too but what I now believe is that your recite fatiha as well. If you didn’t know before there is no sin on you and your salahs at accepted in sha Allah because you did not know.
Just move your lips and recite Al Fatiha silent behind the imam. This way you are still silent and listening, while reciting.
It wil be recorded, and your tongue wil bare witness. Its a win win situation in sha Allah. Allahu 'Alem.
No, there must be sound when you recite fatiha such that if someone would put the ear close to your mouth, they can hear. You dont just move lips with no sound
"Allah does not place two hearts in any person’s chest." Quran 33:4
Imam is the guarantor of the salah. Therefore, if the imam reciting Fatiha out aloud, we don't have to do that. Because, if we recite fatiha along with the imam or imam pause for too long, then it'll harm the beauty of salah in my opinion.
There is a clear hadith that the sheikh mentioned that there is no salah for the one who doesnt recite al fatiha.
Astag9
so the Hanafis salah is invalid according to his understanding of this Hadith, why does Allah SWT say in the Quran;
فَٱقْرَءُوا۟ مَا تَيَسَّرَ مِنَ ٱلْقُرْءَانِ ۚ
Read from whatever you can from the Quran (Muzzammil)
We should not take this Hadith litteral, if you have studied the field and principles of Hadith some Hadith. Hadith is divided in many categories (not according to authencity) but in the meaning and the language, and according to Imam Abu Hanifah (rh) madhhab we dont recite anything behind the imam
th-cam.com/video/ZvacOgfv3ms/w-d-xo.html
It's a matter of difference, Allah knows best who is correct, the person who is correct receives 2 rewards whereas the person who has erred receives 1, as the Messenger صَلّى الله عليه وسلّم in a Hadith. These are matters wherein it permissible to have difference of opinion as both parties tried their level best to get to the truth, so it is not permissible to say this view is incorrect and your salah is in valid. However in matters such as Aqidah, difference of opinion is not allowed as this is to foundation of the religion. والله أعلم
All evidence of the hanafi madhhab on this subject is either weak or general, as in the following verse:
“When the Quran is recited, listen to it attentively and be silent, so you may be shown mercy.” Araf 204
* A person can also listen to the Quran by reciting the Fatiha behind the imam. This verse only orders to listened to the Qur'an
Or Ahadith like:
“Whoever prays behind the imam, the imam's reading is also his reading.” Weak hadith.
Sheikh Fawzan said fatiha behind Imam is not mandatory.
Difference of opinion is allowed in Fiqh
Are you aware of what ikhtilaaf is?