Why Atheists Are Mean Hypocrites
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มี.ค. 2024
- Why are atheists so mean? Why are they such hypocrites? This lady seems to have all the answers and gets annoyed that atheists don't believe in her 'nameless' god... You don;t have to be an 'angry atheist' to get through this one... but you will need to be numb to random sound effects
Original video here - • Why MOST Atheists are ...
What Motivates Angry Atheists - • What Motivates Atheist...
Atheists are stupid playlist - • Atheists are dumb?
** T-Shirts Are Here - my-store-cf9db1.creator-sprin... **
Patreon - / theskeptick
Facebook - / theskeptick
Instagram - / theskeptick
Twitter - / the_skeptick
TikTok - tiktok.com/theskeptick
Everything in this video is just an opinion, and should be treated as such - though it is important to ask questions. Any humour or sarcasm is aimed towards the words and actions of the individuals, and not intended to be a personal attack on any individual themselves, under the act of free speech
Title - Why Atheists Are Mean Hypocrites
Tags - atheists are hypocrites,atheism,atheist,atheists,christianity,tiktik theist,tiktok christian,angry atheists,why are atheists angry,atheist response,atheist responds,why are atheists mean,agnostic,mean atheist comments,why don't atheists believe in god,questions for atheists,theists,christian vs atheist,can you prove god to atheists,how to get an atheist to believe in god
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 69 | คู่เอก "กุหลาบดำ vs นาบิล"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PNM6U8e_HMo/mqdefault.jpg)
"Some atheists were mean to me = all atheists are mean" is such a failure of an argument.
Fallacy of composition at its finest
She says not all atheists are hypocrites…
And then makes a generalized claim that atheists are hypocrites and jerks because people some people of multiple differing faiths from her were insulting her.
That’s only one of the fallacious arguments she makes. Another is when she commits an ad hominem by using one person’s bad spelling to discredit their entire argument, and then says that they must not be educated, therefore we shouldn’t take them seriously.
The other is equivocation I think, when she acts as though “Krishna? Buddha?” means “Krishna or Buddha” when the commenter was very obviously listing two of the many other gods people believe in.
Lmk if there are any more fallacies I missed.
Forgot to carry the remainder
All people who 'hate' me must also be atheists by the transitive powers of NuhUh
"I go around threatening to do terrible things to people in the name of the pronouncements of sinister long-dead theocrats like a good christian should according to my brainless definition of what a good christian is and the people I threaten are mean to me! Clearly they are the problem!"
It's not even a fallacy or argument. It's just the supercharged victim complex cults love to hide behind.
She keeps saying "my child-like questions," and when she gets "child-like answers," she gets upset. Play stupid games win stupid prizes, I guess?
“Because evolution was made up by men, too.”
That “too” is extremely telling.
Youre apllying to much brains to this.
@@va941i have a feeling youre applying too little brains.
@@va941Proofread your comments before posting.
@@reefhogthat's why they have the edit button lol
The reason I don't believe the Bible to be true is not because it was written by man; I reject the claim that the Bible is written or inspired by God as an acceptable argument for not being critical of what is written within it. There is a difference.
It's not that it was written by man that is the problem, it's that it's not supposed to be held to the same standards as anything else written by man.
her question “Why don’t you believe in god?”-
My answer “lack of evidence”
Her question 2 “ why do you believe in evolution?”
Me “I’ll give you two answers one not every atheist believes in evolution.
Two there is a lot of evidence on that you should look it up. I’m not doing your homework.”
Her: "Why don't you believe in God?"
Me: "I find the evidence presented for his existence uncompelling."
Her: "Why do you believe in Evolution?"
Me: "I find the evidence presented for it compelling."
It's not complicated.
And as a side note: There are many theists who believe in evolution.😁
"why do you believe in evolution?”
I don't. I only use the term "believe in" to describe that something is important to me. I believe in friendship, f.e.
I accept evolution because it is a well proven, well tested scientific theory giving us usable and productive predictions. It is falsifiable and still not falsified.
@@hansw5067 Not only that, they are probably the majority. Never forget USA is the exception, not the norm.
@@juanausensi499in my experience they are not the majority, not even close.
My favorite part was how many times she said the comments called themselves geniuses and yet none of them did
Imma geniass!
It seems she thinks if people call her stupid it must mean they think they are geniuses since she can't be stupid.
No you don't understand she's SO smart that anyone who claims she's dumb is claiming they're smarter than her, and if she's a genius then they must be saying THEY are geniuses don't you get it?
@@Aryasvitkona The slime growing in the gutter next to my house in the shadow of the fencing is offended that you excluded it from the 'smarter than her' group just because it's slime and therefore cannot speak and thus accurately claim she's dumb.
I think her "thought process" seems to be, that if someone thinks her dumb, that must require them to be some kind of genius.
In short, using her own intellect as a standard for her metric used to define a genius.
By her definition, I suspect she encounters a lot of geniuses.
Does she understand that Atheists dont have group meetings where we discuss every issue and vote on what we all will believe? 😅
No, no I don't think she does. She has the same issue that all annoying religious people have. They don't understand that that not everyone's thoughts and ethics are made by an identifying group concensus that dictates to people that they must believe since that is how it works for her.
Atheism is the answer to one question, etc. Why is this so hard for people to understand?
So you admit you missed the last meeting?
@@condorboss3339 I didn't see _you_ at that meeting either.
Wait, you mean to tell me that I have been following the Eternal Law of the Great Atheismo, as presented by the Prophet Darwin (blessed be his beard) for no reason???
I don't hate believers, but they are sus so you gotta keep an eye on them.
I feel this a lot. from my perspective as someone whos actually studied the bible and christian religious history, i truly think that 90% of modern christians dont even know their own religion really. If they did, i highly doubt most christians would remain christian
It's even funnier because she's accusing atheists of hating her because she's christian when they're clearly calling her stupid because her own actions have proven her to be stupid, her religion had nothing to do with it. I also hate believers, but I do hate her.
I don't hate _all_ believers, but I do have *_contempt_* for all believers. Especially hate-worthy contemptible ones like her.
And, much like her, when I make that first 'not all' caveat, I mean there are very few exceptions. Unlike her, however, _I actually have some exceptions,_ whereas she's just covering her ass.
She makes a ignorant condescending video and crys because people aren't being nice to her. Imagine my surprise.
None of those were death threats.
@@pollypockets508 I think the "Old Yeller" reference (6:19) could be construed as an implied death threat. Even if it was (most likely) not made with serious intent.
No but she says "yo" and "bruh" so clearly she must be a brain-genius.
It's the Dunning Kruger effect at its best, she has only very superficial knowledge about the subject so she thinks it's easy and people who act differently are just too stupid to understand how easy it is. It's the same reason why people who never left their home country and don't have the slightest clue how politics work in practice think they'd do a good job of ruling the world.
@@pollypockets508 None of them declared themselves geniuses, either. Many weren't even atheist, but she labelled them all as such.
I am not a genius, but I have enough brain power to know that it's highly unlikely that a Jewish carpenter created the universe.
Yes it's hard to believe that a Jewish carpenter created the universe. It's also hard to believe in talking serpents. A burning bush talking. A donkey talking. A virgin having a baby. And a dead person coming back to life. All in the bible. All nonsense.
Yes, he was a carpenter in a place with virtually no wood.
Wasn’t he also a Palestinian …. 😮
You should see the flange joint he put in the Himalayas. Beautiful.
Scientists have a difficult time deciding how to confirm if someone is dead using brain activity, because hooking up an EEG up to a bowl of jell-o makes it look like the jell-o isn't brain-dead.
This woman is the standard they've been looking for.
Gotta love the condescending tone of this pearl-clutching Karen in the making.
Thumbs up for kerbal
You have to give her credit for one very innovative thing: Midst video I felt asleep (How can I not?). I know exactly what for and why these sound-effects are like that.
She is actually annoying down to the level of dreams. That's not an easy achievement, hehehehe:)
(Edit: Oh and a request for the future, @FrikInCasualMode: Please leave the underlying misogyny in the dark hole where it came from. There's no need to dehumanize this person as "Karen" or add your ad hominems here. This woman's actions are just stooopid, or she is playing a very stooopid personality, which by the way is not at all unusual in the entertainment business (online, movie and TV ...). Was it really necessary to put that misogynistic part of the comment in?
Have a great day! Hopefully without random strangers calling you names.
There’s a reason people would rather troll her, and people like her, rather than answer her questions. It’s because why bother? She’s not gonna listen to the answers anyway.
You could write an entire thesis explaining the flaws in all of the arguments for the existence of her god, the inconsistencies and factual errors in her bible, the horrifying immorality of the deity described in that bible and she would dismiss it. You could write another thesis explaining how evolution is the only theory that is compatible with modern science and she would reject it.
Been in enough "debates" to know this kind of intellectually dishonest cross clutchers is only good as an excuse for agnostics observers to jump ship.
She's saying absolutely nothing. She's not making any kind of point.
I think her point is the Internet is mean.
Well, she picked out 5 dumb YT comments and used that to demonize hundreds of millions of people.
And called Muslim people atheist by accident.😮
That's exactly what a meanie would say!
@@zinobi guilty as charged
She keeps mistaking us respecting her right to believe in a religion with us respecting her religion.
One of them I do the other I never will.
She has the right to believe in something silly. We have the right to call it silly. It appears to be difficult to understand for a lot of religious people.
This girl's content is about what I expect from the average apologist. Dumb questions, victim mentality and bad editing included
6:20 The hubris of her to assume, that just because she asked a question people must answer her.
most likely people answered her, but as a good hypocrite she just ignores the questions and focus on the comments that deemed unnecessary to answer such simples and stupid question
"She graduated from the mcdonalds menu" LMAO 💀
I always say "hate the idiocy, not the idiot"
Hate Christianity, not the Christian. Even intelligent people fall for lies, conspiracies.
Agreed. Have one make the claim God exists. When asked him to prove it, his reply was " You asking for proof of God validates the existence of God."
unless that idiot is Kent Hovind
You don't need to hate something to be opposed to it's existence. I don't hate religion as a concept, nor the people believing in it.
I just think Religion, by it's very nature, is inherently detrimental to societal, scientific, and personal development as well as peaceful coexistence between humans, and as such should be phased out of common practice as soon as possible by whatever non-violent means at our disposal. It may have had it's use in our primitive past, but it has long since become obsolete.
@@LadyDoomsingeri think at the very least you dislike religion
I can't even express how happy I am she doesn't live nextdoor to me.
I'm very happy that she don't live in my city.
I'm glad she doesn't live in the same country as me.
And that I'm so happy I don't live in her country.
@@johnburn8031 I share a country with time travel flat earth man. I'm pretty certain someone equally silly lives near you.
Oh, my neighbour is convinced that the government sells our organs for a million dollars when we're dead and keeps the money and he advocates publicly that he wants that million up front 🤣
I just told him that that would encourage the government to kill him asap to increase the chance his organs are still sellable. That didn't register of course. Nothing does.
Woah woah how are you gonna love your neighbor saying stuff like that!!!!
I'll take this theist projects more than an IMAX movie theatre for 100 Alex.
I can barely hear this girl over her damn sound effects!
she knows her argument is bad, so she tries to distract the viewer so she can get more views
You're not missing anything worth hearing anyway.
@johnburn8031 oh without a doubt. Just makes for a bad SkepTick video. These people should be more caring to the people debunking them
@@SuperSwordman1 I don't know why so many TikTokkers think cluttering up their videos with sound effects and images equals quality content. It doesn't, it makes their videos unwatchable.
That's why I don't have a TikTok account. That and the fact everyone jumps on bandwagons. Sheesh, you get copy cat videos constantly! 🤦🏻♂🙇🏻♂
They're driving me nuts, I can't watch it
"Be a skeptical" Yeah that line alone says everything.
Askepticals just aren't convinced of the utility of skepticism. 😛
@@rembrandt972ify HAHAHA 😂😂👍
If we are charitable, we could grant her the benefit of doubt and assume she was using the prefix a- and encouraging her intended audience of inbred hicks to be _askeptical._
And we should be charitable, because being charitable to cultists *_ALWAYS_* makes things worse for them. At worst, she's just ignorant. At best, she's _encouraging people to be gullible._ Even her audience should know, for the most part, that gullibility is bad, while they will universally come to her defense if you just point out she wouldn't know how to string words together properly if you smacked her with a bible.
If hostile or dismissive TH-cam comments invalidate a theological position or indict its believers as a class of people, I have bad news for her about Christianity
"Atheist are always evil, are dumb, and can do no good"
In the bible, I paraphrased it.
Golly, wonder why atheist can be hostile to christianity, couldn't be because the bible and christians regularly assume the worst of atheist.
I have bad news for practically every political, social, religious, or philosophical position ever presented in human history, if that's the case...
I don't think you can find a single topic ever discussed on TH-cam, that hasn't been subjected to hostile or dismissive comments.
does not say much for athiests either
Person 1: "2+2=5." Person 2: "Nope."
Person 1: "The Earth is flat." Person 2: "Nope."
Person 1: "Circles are square." Person 2: "Nope."
Person 1: "You are just disagreeing with everything I say." Person 2: "Yep, but not for the reasons I am guessing you think."
Well your first point might get a different answer from a mathematician. ;-)
@@irrelevant_noob sure if the value is really 2 and a bit not 2.
@@mattm8870 no, a mathematician would understand that in Z1, 2=5=1=0=n where n can be any integer. And thus 2+2=0=5.
Also you bring up an interesting point, if i have two values of "2.3" and set my spreadsheet to display them as numeric with 0 decimals, then their sum will be 5. 🧐
@@irrelevant_noob
2+2 cam also = 11.)
@@guytheincognito4186 in Z3? :-)
She is a perfect example of "How to tell me you don't understand English/critical thinking without saying you don’t understand English/critical thinking."
She asked really bad questions in a slanted way, then parades the honest answers as if they were making fun of her. She attempts to make fun of the respondents, but really only shows her own ignorance.
She doesn't understand the difference between "written by men (and not supported by demonstrable evidence)" and "demonstrably true, with documentation of why it is true, what evidence supports it, and instructions on how to verify it yourself".
To be honest, some went a bit to far (the actual death threads) but most of what she showed was just either the truth or (in my eyes) quite funny burns.
@Valfara770 when she said God was the name of a specific god, she revealed that she didn't know the Abrahamic tradition that their god's name was not to be spoken - YHWH is basically "I am who/what I am" (refusing to name oneself).
The specific responses she highlights are basically almost all honest answers that are also funny burns on her.
She spends time putting down people who say they don't believe because the Bible is just a book written by men (meaning there is nothing more than the nook), then claims science papers (which literally describe how to prove the results) are also written by men (but there is plenty more than just the writing. The writing nit only includes the conclusion, but how to get to the conclusion).
She basically claims that a story about riding a dragon is no different than blueprints and instructions on how to build and fly an airplane. But if you follow the blueprints/instructions, you can actually fly. The same is not true of the story.
@@aaronbredon2948It feels like she got that line of reasoning from some online video or other and, like every other apologist wannabe out there, just ignored the rebuttals people had already given that and then got mad when it wasn't the thought stopper she expected.
@@aaronbredon2948 Importantly, none of the comments about the bible being written by men said that was why they don't believe christianity.
As a general rule, if someone says "I got DEATH Threats ONLINE!" I tentatively conclude they mean they got mild criticism for something they said and are trying to play a violin right now.
Well, it's not that uncommon - especially when discussing particularly "charged" subjects. So I'm willing to take her word for it (especially since that "Old Yeller" reference could definitely be construed as a death threat, even if it was probably not intended that way) - But receiving death threats for your position does not validate your position. It just means the Internet is full of crazy people, and they are fairly indiscriminate in their targets.
Don't doubt it is possible but what she's presented was obviously trolling and was not directed at her.
Death threats do happen though I find it's often religious people who make them.
@@tc-tm1my It tends to go more toward "you deserve eternal torture" instead of "you should go die" but both are used around.
Example Post: “Every word of what you just said is wrong.”
Professional Victim: “It’s a threat on my life!”
Didn't know we were talking about JK Rowling
Let me translate: "LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME I'M IMPORTANT LOOK AT ME I'M BEING REPRESTED!!!"
COME SEE THE VIOLENCE INHERENT IN THE SYSTEM! HELP, HELP, I’M BEING REPRESSED!
Man TikTok and this no attention span thing without dumb sound effects happening all the time is a cancer
I think that says more about her, or what she thinks of her audience, than it does about the world in general.
It is funny that she accuses the person who asked her which god of having poor reading comprehension, when she completely misses the point of the question.
If she understood the point of an oblique question like that, she wouldn't believe everyone who understands the Bible's authorship only disbelieves it because of that.
Well technically the 2nd choice in that comment wasn't quite valid, Buddha isn't a god, is he? :-s
@@irrelevant_noob you're right. I suspect the commenter added Buddha's name to stress the different religions that exist.
Because theists like her don't know what hypocrite means
Theists don't know what _anything_ means. They speak their own language. I'm not making some sort of joke here, either; cults use language wrong to make it harder for their victims to seek outside help.
It's preventative sabotage. Like teaching that green lights mean stop and red means go, then blaming the resulting accidents on everybody else.
Is her hair dyed? She might want to read her holy book.
Google "Bible says not to dye hair" and read all the Christians arguing that it's allowable or that it's a sin, and both sides citing verses to support their beliefs.
You can literally argue for or against _anything_ while citing verses from the Bible.
@@christasimon9716lol it's not called "The Great book of Multichoice" for nothing
How do we know she shouldn't be in her shame hut 🤔 I'm certain she doesn't do the proper cleansing rituals before speaking to men.
“The code is more what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules.” they will argue about they love cherry picking for some reason
Interesting how she ignores the comments that do answer her question despite leaving parts of them up
Pardon me Miss, you seem to have gotten some Dunning on your Kruger.
HAHAHA 😂😂👍👍
Lol 😆
Lmao you win best comment award
pardon me you seem to have gotten some bully on your online personality
people tell her she's stupid.... because she is....
She opened her mouth and removed all doubt
I guess the noises were in there to emphasize how incoherent her rambling is.
Seriously, the cartoon level sound effects are appropriate for how much of a caricature of an intellectual she is.
"Well you can't really be skeptical of not being convinced of something." Quote of the year there mate. I'd throw ya a few quid but I'm skint, soz.
"She graduated from the Mcdonald's menu"
😂😂😂
but when she goes to a Burger King she is completely lost again.
We're mean because we're fed the fuk up
Exactly! They're she so upset over some words. In upset because they're trying to take my wife and daughter's rights and would murder us if given a chance.
We're mean because we are done watching them be mean and lie saying they're doing the "lord's work" while hurting people. I have never claimed to NOT be mean. Someone has to stand up to cultist bullies. If they think i am being mean to their sky fairy, have him come talk to me about it. You should see how mean i am to MY beliefs. They gotta stand up to scrutiny.
She sure seems to struggle with the fact that not every atheist is the same person. Well and a few other things.
Something tells me she's "surprised" by a lot.
14,000 comments and she's complaining? That channel is doing well.
she dreamed of 14,000 likes but that turned out differently, I guess.
@MrCanis4 When you go look at her channel it turns out to be nearer 14 comments. She can count 1, 2, lots.
god is not his name, we call him god because we will get stoned if we say Jehoo oh shit i almost said it.
Lisa the Rainbow giraffe (Leaf be upon her) is the one true deity!
Nah FSM is more just. Unlike Lisa, I get free pasta on Fridays from FSM.
You’re in this week!
Couldn't continue watching this. If I wanted to watch vertical video, I would be on that stupid format.
I hear that
I’m sure the internet left her alone and stopped criticizing her after she uploaded this…
“A bold strategy, Cotton! Let’s see if it works!”
She made up that atheists said they arent judgemental and then called us hypocrites for judging her. Smh
Omg i started busting out laughing at the "this video has permenantly lowered my standards for human intelligence" whoever left that comment is amazing 😂😂😂
Not all atheists are hypocrites. Look at Viced Rhino. He's more of rhinocrite.
That makes me a giraffeocrite
@@TheSkepTickI used to farm worms, so I'm a vermicrite 😝
Or look at Aron. He's an aronicrite.
Respect for people is valuable. Respect for ideas and beliefs is not.
Only if the people show they're worthy of respect.
@@TerraHv1 I'm willing to respect people until they demonstrate they are not worthy. I don't generally feel that respect needs to be earned, but it can certainly be lost.
In any case, yes, there are situations where I recognize it is less important (or even totally unimportant) to respect certain people as a result of their actions.
@@martinmckee5333 I give basic courtesy to people until they are either rude or pleasant on our first meeting and my respect for them will either grow or stay nill.
@@TerraHv1 That's another way to look at it. I'm not sure how much of the difference in our approaches is actually just semantics. Though, perhaps, I am too willing to express actual respect. Curtosy is probably sufficient... until you know something about them.
@@TerraHv1 I don't think it's a matter of whether they are "worthy" of respect - respect is something you give, because you choose to be decent and accepting of others. It really has nothing to do with the person you're giving it to, it's all a question of what kind of person YOU personally want to be. It's kind of like "love" in a way; if it has to be earned, it is at best a shallow imitation of the real thing.
the sound effects gave me a stomachache
So...she posted something online and is shocked that it got some mean comments?
Lady, _anything_ posted online can draw fire. One could post "I like bunnies!" and someone will rage post about how they feel oppressed by that because their great-great...
...great-great grandfather's best friend's twice-removed cousin was done-in by the Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog.
I know that person what did got done in by said bunny
"Ah. Well, @@TheSkepTick , the werewolf community has already apologized for that. Now, I'll admit I was supposed to have dealt with that rabbit, but werewolves don't get invited 'round to Trader Vic's for piña coladas very often, and...well...the rabbit got pushed off my schedule. Sorry."
“That rabbit is dynamite!” said King Arthur - at a time before dynamite was invented.
@@autonomouscollective2599
"Details, details." Hehehe.
I hate bunnies and I find you triggering! My great great great great great granddaddy chocked to death on a bunny! Creatures of satan they are, and you too if you love them! 😂
There's the question: "What made you *not* believe in God?" The assumption that her way of thinking is the universal default position.
its not because the bible was written by man that I dont believe what it claims, it is because what it claims is quite literally impossible, and I would require a HUGE amount of evidence to make a case for it, which none exists.
The mythical Flood of Noah was debunked by simple logic that the Egyptians, Neolithic Chinese, ,Indus ValleyMayans and other cultures with meticulous records never noticed the apocalypse
While I agree that the death threats and insults are unacceptable, if she's going to be putting stuff like this out on the internet she needs to grow a thicker skin. The anonymity of the internet brings out most people's inner asshole. Also, while the first question had merit, the second was disingenuous and not asked in good faith.
I'd also like to point out that there is a very significant difference between death threats and insults. One is a genuine promise or suggestion of real harm; the other is just words.
Words can definitely hurt, but they can never kill you.
Such an illogical question was likely mocked by people of many faiths and no faith alike.
as she herself decided to include (7:50) :-)
SkepTick for president!
Pahaha. Could you imagine.
@@TheSkepTick yes, I could. It would be horrific. But at least two orders of magnitude less horrific that either 'Let's go Brandon' or 'Donald Trumpet' would be. So, the lesser of 3 evils...
I think we should have "Let's Go Titties"
I'm sorry, I couldn't understand her point because of all of the completely random sound effects. Wtf.
I hope Lisa the Rainbow Giraffe bestows leaves upon you all.
🦒🍃
8:22 I fucking hate that. I had my points dismissed by christians because I had some spelling errors, it's something that I struggle with, but the only way to correct that is if people tell me I did a mistake, but most never do, it's not practical for me to get every comment or post I ever make in a spellchecker
I understand people not trying to correct you, those kind of comments often get a lot of hate, or at the very least, "this isn't a professional document so stfu." Many browsers nowadays have spellchecking built in, I personally use a variant of Firefox and it has one. Of course, that isn't necessarily the case on mobile devices or if your computer is not set to English as the default.
As a blind person, I did not grow up seeing a lot of words spelled out and it takes me a lot longer than most people to go back through a comment to check its spelling and grammar. So I also struggle with my spelling, especially homonyms.
It's super hypocritical of her when she says things like, "affinity, ex-specially," and , "be a skeptical."
Ignore it. It's basically a gaslighting technique that they feel empowers them to dismiss to dismiss the questioner and avoid the question altogether.
@@ianchisholm5756 It's not gaslighting (deliberately and maliciously trying to make someone think they are going crazy), but valid point otherwise: it is belittling or poisoning the well or an ad hominem attack to make it look invalid without addressing the meat of the comment.
Seneca said it best: "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
13:36 Mommy, father, nana, grandpa, auntie, miss, mister, sir, etc. All are singular nouns, which are not typically proceeded by “a” or “the,” but are not proper names.
I mean, no wonder her commenters couldn't do what she asked, considering being bombarded with all those sound effects.
Look, I had a lovely dinner and all I said was That piece of cuttlefish was good enough for Jehovah
Being called 'mean' and 'hypocrite' by a Bible-thumper is like being called 'smelly' by a skunk.
Lisa be praised..lbuh
Or alisakbhar...ha ha ha
"Question everything" does not mean "Never reach a conclusion."
In my experience, many of the people who talk about questioning everything are actually trying to support an existing bias towards a specific answer.
@@mjjoe76 And if you object to their desired answer, you're accused of being "closed-minded."
I won’t comment on what she’s acting like and how her “arguments” are coming across because that wouldn’t be right. All I’ll say is that she really needs to stop trying to make “fetch” happen.
“Religious apologists complain bitterly that Atheists and Secularists are aggressive and hostile in their criticism of them.
I always say: look, when you guys were in charge, you didn’t argue with us, you just burnt us at the stake. Now what we’re doing is, we’re presenting you with some arguments and some challenging questions, and you complain.” - A.C. Grayling
There's no use in arguing with her, SKepTick. She clearly doesn't know how words work. So, even if you give her an answer she won't be able to process it. In the 80's F.R. David had a smash hit with 🎶words are my reality🎶 - and apparently she's made that song her motto in life by creating her own reality...
Yes, you should keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out.
Too late..
I think the Bible needs another edition for the current year internet user with a "don't feed the trolls" snuck somewhere in there. This is just impossible to watch, the second-hand embarrassment is too much
That would be a Bible I could read!
" _The Third Testamane: The Sequel_ "
New commandments lol. 1 thou shalt give gaze to the trolls comments. 2 thou shalt reply to Nigerian Princes... Lmao
@@stevenswitzer5154 3) Thou shalt not deal with MLMs; with them you shall neither buy nor sell, nor shall you refer a friend.
I'll go with something shallow...
"Elvira called, she wants her bangs back."
Elvira has more scientific credibility than Rachel
"she is the kind of person who fails the captcha" had me sent 😂
TikTok: where curious adults go when they want to hear a debunking (complete with silly, irritating sound effects) of Atheism, Evolution, Science, Logic, Reason, etc., etc., etc...
Yes whenever somebody comes at me with a different version of Romans 1:20 it goes in one ear and out the other.
The way to respond to Romans 1 : 20 is to reverse it: " _People claim to know there is a god, but they don't really believe it, so they make the claim to try and convince themselves and others_ ." The Christians will reply that they know what they think and you can respond "So do I."
I like to congratulate them on just proving the Bible to be wrong.
What’s with all these sound effects ranging from old video games to smartphone notifications in her cope and seethe video? Who’s she trying to appeal to with it?
I really like the "She got a 'See me after class' on her IQ test."
Tar-man once grabbed Rachel during a Trioxin outbreak but tossed her over the horizon once he realized that there wasn’t any gray matter in her head
By all means, be skeptical about evolution...at first. But the way to assuage any doubts is...to LEARN ABOUT EVOLUTION. The WRONG way to be skeptical is....To make and publish videos where you show off your ignorance and disinterest in learning.
So, what was the point of her video besides 'I'm a hate magnet'? Oh right: proving she doesn't know what an atheist is.
I really love the TicTok snowflakes that post to TH-cam and get owned because they can't block everyone that disagrees with them. 😂
Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis and other apologists get butthurt over criticism
She doesn't understand the meaning of words like hypocrite and irony.
I took a closer look on her list of contradictions and it supports my earlier comment at least in regard to the first two. How can totally unrelated topics contradict each other?
And let's be honest here: the speed in which she reacts to the comments doesn't leave any time to properly think her answers thoroughly through. So, apart from the prepared parts one shouldn't expect a coherent string of thoughts. Not every shot fired from a machine gun will find its target. And it's also a handy trick to bombard your audience with quick and speedy answers to avoid serious follow up questions because you've already changed the topic. Granted though, this form of communication doesn't support a deep conversation in any way whatsoever.
It's there for the same reason I think a lot of these people make videos like this. It has nothing to do with us, they're showing off to people who already believe the same thing they do. This was her shot at Jesus points, which certainly explains why she ignored people who did answer her insipidly antagonistic questions.
So I'm willing to bet that at least one person actually did respectfully answer her question. Did she respond to them in a different video?
I mean some of the comments are like mean or snarky but all I’d have to say to that is, “First time?” Also I like how she’s pretending all Christian’s are angels who’d never insult anyone over their beliefs. Only those mean, dirty atheists probably because they have no grasp on morality, am I right?
They're afraid of words, we are afraid They're going to murder us.
The sound-effects. I returned Simon the Sorcerer for its whacky sound-effects.
When confidently incorrect goes for a marathon!
Respect of someone else’s right to have an opinion is not the same as respect of the opinion itself!
I completely respect her right to be a Christian - that doesn’t mean I will not mock and laugh at Christianity…
3:20 gotta love her going 'now i know the BEYOND OVERWHELMINGLY MASSIVE MAJORITY of you guys fucking flamed me good so you guys are right BBBBBBUUUUUUTTTTTTTTT im still gonna repeat exactly what i just said!'
The "this is what it looks like when your iq starts with a decimal point" comment is freaking hilarious.
"She graduated from the McDonald's menu"
Okay, that was a good one xD
My very hypocritical third.
"why do you believe in evolution?”
I don't. I only use the term "believe in" to describe that something is important to me. I believe in friendship, f.e.
I accept evolution because it is a well proven, well tested scientific theory giving us usable and productive predictions. It is falsifiable and still not falsified.
I feel like even Lisa fell asleep during this rant 🤣
I love how she labels anyone an atheist that doesn’t 100% agree with her. Especially when the commenter explicitly stated they weren’t an atheist.
I may make snarky comments about someone's religious beliefs or lack of understanding of evolution but I know I am never going to change a believer's mind. Further, any proper discussion of either religion vs atheism or evolution would require a 20,000 word megapost that no one would read.
The simple answer to why I don't believe in any god is that there is no convincing evidence of one. There are lots of assertions, but no evidence.
The simple answer to my acceptance of evolution is that denying it would require the rejection of not just evolution, but the entire body of science from astronomy to chemistry to physics to zoology.
Personally, I don't really care whether a god is real or not.
What I want to know is why I should accept the authority of people who claim to speak on behalf of their god without evidence.
@@LadyDoomsinger It is remarkable how the dislikes and prejudices of every god align so well with the dislikes and prejudices of those who claim to speak for the god. 😜
Woopee. Pretend the trolls represent the entirety of the group. Ask any atheist TH-camr about their trolls.
There are PLENTY!
And irl trolls, too, who can- and will- get you fired among other things.
Fallacy of composition at its finest
🙋🏻♂️🙋🏻♂️🙋🏻♂️
This video of hers is like the ADHD Olympics. Distracting messages and goofy sound effects every two seconds
Once again do theists not really understand the skeptic/atheist position. If given sufficient evidence to overturn evolution I along with any other reasonable person would no longer accept that as the best theory we have to explain the biodiversity we see today.
Surely the difference between the bible and (for arguments sake) the origins of the species, being written by man is, only one is claiming to be written, even indirectly, by an all powerful super fairy
Honestly, I can imagine her scrolling through the sound library, making sure she didn't use a single sound effect twice
Her incredulity about it being 2,000 years old and tells you how much to sell your daughters for is hilarious, because it does.
Not a single person says "i don't believe BECAUSE it was written by man, which is her repeated claim.
But if you don't believe im a god, of course it was written by man! Who else could have written it? Dolphins?
Wow, shes really vain. Isn't vanity a sin? 😂
Yes it is, and her clothes seems to be made from more than one type of fabric. You know what that means.....