This is probably the most comprehensive, understandable and focused content in this topic I have ever watched. This should be localized to dozens of languages and aired in schools. Respect.
This is the best summarization of the climate I've seen. It's rare I see the solar cycle discussed to the point of nucleation sites. I wish you had discussed the long-term brightening of our sun (models vary, but scientists estimate the sun was 30% dimmer during the time of the dinosaurs than today), as well as vulcanism. Regardless, this is the most comprehensive video I've seen and I wish more people would see it. I know I'll be sharing it with people.
Weren't there also really old stories that suggested at one point the earth was in perpetual twilight, and that something happened at some point in the distant past, that made the sun way brighter and hotter? I can't recall WHERE I heard that story, just that it had something to do with "the mystery schools" and some knowledge passed down within. Very interesting though - and something I find entirely plausible.
For some reason the censors won`t allow me to type this number, but it`s FIVE-THIRTY-SIX, the year, and it was the beginning of a terrible period of suffering due to vulcanism. Sulphur compound spikes are present in ice at both poles. Today it would be far worse since we`re completely unprepared which is hard to believe. This relatively stable temperature period for the past 5000 years will abruptly end one day. Our corn, wheat, rice, beans and fruits won`t be able to be produced and livestock won`t be fed. And no preparations are in place to ease the fall. That isn`t very smart and it`s baffling.
You mean AI generated garbage (using celebrity voices) isnt convincing enough? Joe Rogan just told me how to increase my IQ by taking one simple supplement! I want to believe.
@@holopeve I think you are overestimating the intelligence of these advertisers. It is a matter of volume that creates the return not the actual advert. Hell, I could sell lawn clippings using the same technique I bet.
@@resignator You just argued their point... The entire conversation is based on "too many ads", the responder said "it must work", you said "no its because of the volume that makes it work at all".... That is literally saying the too many ads obviously works...
You tube only cares that the advertisers pay them to advertise. Not necessarily if the adverts make money for themselves.. Though one is connected to the other. If you have great distain for adverts, like i do, just install adblock and have a much much much better life on youtube. I literally dont have tv or radio because i despise adverts with a passion. I am on youtube all day every day and havent had an advert in a decade.
1816 The global "Year without summer (big freeze)" 3°C temperature drop and crop failures. April 1815, volcano Mount Tambora began to violently erupt. Millions of tons of ash, dust, and sulfur dioxide were released into the atmosphere, casting a temporary chill across the planet as it Blocked out the Sunlight for months on end. Documented around the world in literature.
We are facing a global intinction event in less than 50 yrs.if we continue to heat up the planet in 29 yrs all crops will fail and there wil be no food after that most animals will die out.
See NATURE, Issue 486, pages 240-242 (2012) "A Signature of Cosmic Ray Increase in A.D.774-775 rom ancient tree rings Japan. F.Miyake et. al. of Nagyoa Univecsitym Japan. They dscovered spikes in C-14 and Be-10 in indviual tree rings, which was correlated with the same spikes in ancient ICE CORES--- and MIYAKE says she beleve the origin of this "Storm" of PROTONS & NEURONS cam from OUTER SPACE (likely solar "Supernovae" screaming in after speedn at light-speed though empy space until stiking the outer starosphere and changing N-14 into C-14!
Around 1750 AD (during the middle of a 400 years long cold period) we had CO2 at 180ppm. By 1950 CO2 had reached 200ppm but temperatures had warmed faster than the CO2 built up. Today we have 400ppm CO2 but temperatures, measured via ice core data, have hardly moved and have possibly got colder. CO2 does not seem to have the warming effect we are constantly told it has.
My favorite way to go to sleep, gently lullabied by his lilting voice telling us of our future horrors. Yet it’s not nightmare fuel. That’s talent. He’s like the Bob Ross of science.
Are you serious? I was just browsing for a video to watch along my meal, refresh and what do I see? An almost 2 hour Astrum video posted a minute ago. Thanks man! Edit: What exactly in my comment makes disappointingly many people assume that I eat for 2 hours straight? You people do comprehend, that a video can be continued being watched after one has finished eating, no?
Melinkovich cycles are the reason why I only feed my cows re-fied and baked beans to produce all of the farts and I leave all my equipment on my farm perpetually idling when not in use. You can thank me when the earth does not turn into a snowball.
Dear Astrum team I want to congratulate you on this beautiful production of almost two hours on the discussion of global warming. The extensive scientific research that you addressed and delved into is simply brilliant. Bravo !!! I am a Geologist and yes, climate change is scary, but through this documentary, you manage to bring the true and essential substrate necessary for us to understand the relevance and responsibility of our role as human beings within this complex cycle that has governed our planet for more than 4 billion years. Continue to improve knowledge of astronomy and science in general with your videos. Once again, congratulations to everyone on the team and especially to you, Alex McColgan, for the wonderful work leading your Astrum.
@@tetrasphere8165 yeah it is. This last week has been unbelievable. It’s so frightening so many people have died so many people lost their homes. If you don’t think that’s frightening then you might be a sociopath.
@@Jude74 I've worked for 4+ environmental groups but the fear is ridiculous. Being afraid of car farts and cow farts is silly. Respect the earth regardless and just keep in mind that on the day we get our so called footprint down to near zero, is the day a volcano blots out the sun. Also our technology will catch up before we have to start shitting our pants.
Our planet was formed 4 billion years ago according to the new scientists carbon dated. But it took almost 3 billion to transform from big ball field with ocean of magma, slowly cooled down due to excessive CO², Sulphur Dioxide, emitted through the empty space filled with vacuum and push it while creating our atmosphere millions of average meteorite continue to bombard the earth from far solar system due to new created solar that introduce new gravitational energy. Our earth after covered with gases emitted from lava ball covered the earth surfaces and reduce the solar heat then our earth started cooling leaving behind solid compact but delicate mineral while the chemical reaction that gives the sun it's energy continue to burn and melting irons plate and leave stone behind to form the different types of solid spread crust. and the process never stopped till today. The earth have experience 3 ice age in 4 billion. Our earth still have another 2 billion years of enjoying life as it cycling around the sun.
Solar cycles also affect the polar vortex. Solar maximums put more energy into the atmosphere causing increases in the variability of the polar vortexes. At solar minimums the polar vortexes are basically circular. Solar cycles have also been linked to the magnetic connections between the earth and saturn. Magnetic connections between the sun and planets is at least as important as the gravitaional connections. Also affecting the heliosphere is the cyclical connections with galactic influences. Good job. Well put together discusion.
Absolutely awesome presentation, my gratitude. I was talking with someone I just met about things in general, then when I brought up “ climate warming “, he responds :that is not the case but rather a fabrication by the powers that be, to control us 🤨 , but then he say that the sun is coming to a cycle where it goes dormant, creating an ice age. And so he left me very confused and disheartened about it all. Having a clear data , can help the whole of us to be on the same page, and there is our first step towards resolution, because I don’t think any one in their right mind would object to saving our planet, ‘less you are mad ,; what can be more important, We should talk about what needs to be balanced, such as : a life style that is not sustainable, we should take a breather , also the balance between technology and spirituality; it seems to me that what is happening with our planet is a reflection of some thing off in our judgment and maturity as a species, certainly we don’t want to do harm to our own home/ planet/selves, or the “party” to end, or do we ?😂😮😢, much love and respect, those of us that are becoming increasingly aware of the situation, have our hands full, blessings…
Nobody is denying climate change, the point is the sun is the biggest driver of it, not the 0.02% co2 in the atmosphere. It's not man made, and governments can't tax the sun, but they can you and I
The vast majority of co2 emissions are produced by China and India. People in Western countries can reduce their carbon footprint to 0 and it would only be a drop in the bucket compared to China. Any discussion about climate change that doesn't address China's role is just a waste of time and people that want to feel good about "saving the planet" by just blowing smoke up each others' bums
Ben thinks that geomagnetic induced current can melt steel. He also thinks steel melted during the Carrington event. He is confused about what exactly will be happen when his fantasy micro nova occurs. Even if we had a micro nova, the earths shield is limited in how much energy it can generate from its movement. Ben believes rubber will block induction. He confused E1pulse with E3. If we get currents either induces or direct pulse energy strong enough to melt steel, we are all goners immediately, like that of a lightning strike. Hitting every square inch of the earth. I could go on, but won't because Ben sounds like he knows what he is talking about about because that is what cult leaders sound like, it's a confidence game. Cheers.
Interesting to note that it was to Doug Vogt that the US government turned when S4488 was amended, and how L ALvarez called him to enquire 'How he figured it all out' decades before S0me people were aware... Interesting too that the Russian authorities also recognise Vogt's 47 years of diligent research. I understand Ben turns 40 this year...
6:40 FYI at this part(so far in your video) is incorrect. Paradoxically Earth is warmer when it is farther from the Sun. This is due to the seasonal effect of the uneven distribution of land and water between the northern and southern hemispheres. July, when Earth is at its most distant, is also summer for the northern hemisphere. The north has more land which heats faster than water. January, when Earth is closest to the Sun, is summer for the southern hemisphere dominated by oceans which respond more slowly to the increase in the Sun’s energy. The tilt in Earth’s axis produces almost 20 times the effect of the changing distance from the Sun, and the difference in local geography is 2 to 3 times more important than the changing distance. We make our closest approach to the Sun (147.5 million km) in January, that's called perihelion, and we're farthest from the Sun (152.6 million km) in July, that's aphelion. "Averaged over the globe, sunlight falling on Earth in July (aphelion) is indeed about 7% less intense than it is in January (perihelion)." That's the good news. The bad news is it's still hot. "In fact the average temperature of Earth at aphelion is about 4° F (2.3° C) higher than it is at perihelion." Earth is actually warmer when we're farther from the Sun! How can that be? It's because our planet is --in a sense-- lopsided. Continents and oceans aren't distributed evenly around the globe. There's more land in the northern hemisphere and more water in the south. During the month of July --near the start of northern summer-- the land-crowded northern half of our planet is tilted toward the Sun. "Earth's temperature (averaged over the entire globe) is slightly higher in July because the Sun is shining down on all that land, which heats up rather easily," says Spencer. Solar heating raises the temperature of continents more than water because the heat capacity of land is lower. Bill Patzert, an oceanographer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory explains: "The temperature of land changes easily, which is what we mean by low heat capacity. Consider the desert: At night the desert is cold, perhaps only 60° F. When the Sun rises in the morning the temperature might jump to 100° F or more." Such mercurial behavior is characteristic of materials like rocks and soil with little thermal inertia. It doesn't take much sunlight to substantially elevate their temperature. "On the other hand," says Patzert, "oceans have a tremendous heat capacity. They tend to keep [the energy] they capture and are very stingy about giving it back." This quality moderates the temperature swings of ocean environments. "Let's say you went sailing off Malibu Beach at noon," says Patzert. "The offshore temperature might be 75° F -- pretty pleasant!" What happens after sunset? "The temperature drops, but only a few degrees because the thermal inertia of the ocean is so high." All this explains why July is our planet's warmest month: Northern continents baked by the aphelion Sun elevate the average temperature of the entire globe. Six months later, in January, the situation is reversed as our planet presents its water-dominated hemisphere to the Sun. "We're closer to the Sun in January," says Spencer, "but the extra sunlight gets spread throughout the oceans." Southern summer in January (perihelion) is therefore cooler than northern summer in July (aphelion). Strange but true! Another notable difference between summers in the two hemispheres is their duration," adds Lebo. According to Kepler's 2nd Law, planets move more slowly at aphelion than they do at perihelion. As a result, Northern summer on Earth is 2 to 3 days longer than southern summer -- which gives the Sun even more time to bake the northern continents.[1] The fact that people living in the northern hemisphere are warmer when near aphelion is primarily due to the seasons, which are caused by the tilt of our axis. The fact that the Earth as a whole is also warmer when near aphelion is due to the difference in geography between the two hemispheres (mostly water in southern hemisphere, water and land in the northern hemisphere). In numerical terms, the tilt of our axis produces almost 20 times the effect of our changing distance from the Sun, and the difference in local geography is 2 to 3 times more important than the changing distance.
TL;DR: Earth's land is not evenly distributed and the thermal inertia and heat capacity of the Oceans is different than that of land, plus a bunch of other factors. Basically we're out of phase with what you'd expect based on the distance alone.
Your analysis is correct but so is the presenter's - he doesn't contest the actual overall temperature effect on the earth, and correctly shows that it is changing. Northern hemisphere gets milder summers compared to southern - that's fact.
Earth doesn't need us, never did because we don't belong here like this, humans are no more than an infected scab on mother Gaia. One day our presence will be nothing but a scar, a reminder of a small failure, what not to do.
I do think we have to make something of self conscious. Of all earths species we humans have arguably the most time to acknowledge our time on earth beyond that of mere survival. There has to be meaning , but first as a collective species, we have to respect our mortality. Soo many trivial distractions plague us. I believe we’re getting there though.
The more I've learned about our power grid & our climate, the more i realize that modern nuclear energy is our best option. LFTRs, Thorium Reactors, molten salt reactors, etc. Utilizing our advanced technology, Improved engineering & material science. Utilizing our greater understanding of safety & well made designs. We have so much more advanced computer technology & robotics that can be used. It feels like even tho tons of advancement has occurred with engineering designs, safety measures, etc. It still doesn't matter to most people. It's like most people are ingrained with a natural negative response when talking about nuclear energy. It's a bummer because i truly believe that our best option for our future is to start utilizing Modern advanced nuclear energy options in our electrical grid. It's just proving to be challenging to get politicians to get on board. It will really allow places to be much more energy independent. Less reliant on fossil fuels. They'll have efficient, stable electrical grids and the rest of the grid could experiment with alternative power sources, power desalination plants, etc. We need to heal from the trauma of our past. See & learn that those things only happened solely from Us not understanding what we were doing when it came to nuclear energy at the time. We didn't have advanced enough technology, material science, engineering, safety measures, understanding of how to go about everything, etc. This source of energy will greatly help the world improve towards the future and lowering emissions. More than anything else could, while also providing a very stable electrical grid system. Currently we have alternative energy options but the majority of our grid is powered off of fossil fuels and emission producing sources of energy. We will be so much better going forward commiting to modern advanced nuclear energy options. It's been very irritating that our society has taken this "Change is up to you" approach. It just takes advantage of people's emotions. This climate issue is so much bigger than any one individual. This needs to be an across the board kind of thing. That's the only way we might make the Slightest difference. We've already waited too long. Everyday is a day wasted. A day where we haven't committed to modern nuclear energy options. Where we haven't even started building it. It should be utilized in collaboration with other alternative energy sources all over the place. This power source is the best option to improve our environment & will really help lower our emissions. The only thing holding us back is legislation, fear mongering & past trauma that's affected us from our past failures (which is understandable but I know we can do better now. We've learned so much sense then. We gotta give it a shot. It's such a beneficial energy source when done right) Did they outlaw electricity, oil, natural gas or coal when things went wrong in the early days of those fields? No! They kept going and understood things usually are bumpy and difficult in the beginning and kept going even tho those sources negatively impacted our environment. A huge issue is our government is BLOCKING any sort of progression from happening. Will be lucky to see the slightest projects approved or finished with-in the next 100 years.. It's very annoying to see how much we have gotten in our own way when it comes to improving or advancing certain things. Instead we let fear, money, man made "required legal processes" Stop us from doing anything other than wind, solar, oil, natural gas, damming our rivers, mining for minerals... It's very frustrating because we should be able to use all these options in collaboration. If we actually wanted to improve anything. That's what we need to do and stop letting so much potential get blocked from ever occurring in the first place.. It's really irritating. I wish certain people didn't make this so "complicated and difficult" Why would any reasonable person want to block progression?
Over time science and business have come up with ever-increasing ways of being stupid and greedy. We have had: lead pigmented paint, leaded gasoline, dioxin from imperfect manufacturing, phthalate in plastic, asbestos, etc etc Microplastics may be killing us all. Without regulations we'd all be dead by now and most birds would be extinct
@@TheBcoolGuy are you implying his initial point that we should utilize nuclear is moot because the rest of his post is full of idealism and the realization of how fucked the world is? Strip the discussion of emotions, and look at it pragmatically, and nuclear is the much better option. ANd im not talking about those reactors built in the 50's. Im talking current designs like OP mentioned. Breeder reactors are undeniably one of the best ways to generate energy, with minimal human input, and tiny carbon footprint. Its about as automated as you can get with energy generation, hence why nuclear is so damn cheap. Not to mention, the literal only waste is STEAM. Coal is also more radioactive than even current nuclear reactors, which is WILD to me, considering the biggest argument against nuclear is the radiation.
00:08 Earth's climate is governed by complex cycles. 03:13 Earth's orbit and tilt influence temperature changes 09:18 Earth's tilt and rotation influencing ice ages 12:18 Earth's cycles, including Milankovitch cycles and El Niño Southern Oscillation, impact global temperatures and climate. 18:27 Shifts in Pacific Jet Stream lead to global weather impacts 21:35 La Niña shifts Earth's cycles with varied regional impacts 27:36 Earth's atmospheric winds have complex polar vortexes 30:39 Coriolis force redirects winds to create jet streams. 36:27 Sudden Stratospheric Warming can lead to significant jet stream reversals. 39:29 Imbalances in global temperatures lead to Jetstream shifts. 45:26 Earth's core acts as a giant dynamo 48:25 The Earth's magnetic field is precarious and constantly fluctuating. 54:33 Earth's magnetic field weakening and the potential impact on society 57:23 The Sun's cycles may significantly impact life on Earth 1:03:26 The Sun's cycle mystery and its impact on Earth 1:06:20 Geomagnetic storms affect technology and ecosystems 1:12:08 The Earth is facing a shift in the Moon's cycles. 1:15:11 Lunar nodes influence tidal extremes 1:21:04 Lunar nodal cycle affects mangrove canopy cover 1:23:58 Polders, dams, and sand dunes protect against water 1:25:51 Global warming is causing unexpected changes on Earth. 1:28:46 Understanding past global temperatures through ice core and Foraminifera analysis. 1:34:47 Rapid rise in global temperatures is concerning due to its quick pace. 1:37:53 Human activity is significantly impacting global temperatures through greenhouse gas emissions. 1:44:26 Impact of global temperature change on species survival 1:47:30 Climate change is happening rapidly, and we need fundamental changes to stop it. Crafted by AI ?
this video feels very natural and quite well written, plus this channel has been producing videos on a similar quality for years, so despite the growth of AI in the past year, i really doubt it
Let me help you to look at it differently. One volcano eruption is equal to all human influences for one year. So if the solar magnetic energy is being absorbed in the earths core that causes more volcanic activity and we get 4-5 more per year one can understand the co2 rise. Imho climate change is real but humanity isn’t as big as a factor as the globalist claim. The globalist have used cc to give them authority. They have plans to control every aspect of your life. 15 minute cities, control food supply, digital money that can be controlled. Eventually they will require you join the system or die. They will require you to worship them. A global money, a global government, a global religion. And eventually a chip underneath your skin that can control your money, your health, and eventually your thoughts. Transhumanism. They have told us the future and most on here will call me a conspiracy theorist. Most ignore the facts that de population has already begun. Put your trust in the creator. Read more. Find the truth. Cc is real but the globalist are using it to bring in globalism. I suggest following a TH-cam channel called suspicious observers. He reports on cc and many studies that don’t get public attention. Peace to all and love each other.
@@Superior.scenicmoodswhy do people believe someone very powerful can alter and manipulate the nature? The only power so powerful that can alter the natural process of our earth is the same force that commanded all the energy to act together colliding on each other to cause friction to ignite highly explosive energy that left debris burning Ashes and gases into the space and everything works precisely to form what we see today. Only that power can command the same forces not to work again. The biggest thing we human can build to life on earth is nuclear and hydrogen bombs. 😂😂😂
I live in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, we are experiencing an extreme Flood even bigger than the one in Peru like you showed, and it was partially because of the El Niño as well, the power of the elements in our earth are insurmoutable, we can't really predict or overcome them right now, and yet we influence it so much
É terrível o que estamos vivendo aqui. Sem precedentes na história e, mesmo assim, nem mesmo outros brasileiros parecem entender a dimensão do desastre.
The cosmic rays coming through the souther anomaly could be creating more rain, I have read that cosmic rays couse cloud nucleation; not sure how stronge the evidence is though.
Grass is taking over the earth. These days it seems like I have to mow every single week, if not twice sometimes. I'm consumed by my ideology of the rise of grass.
Do we influence is so much though? Man covers almost none of the Earth. Our Energy usage and output is not even near even that of a mid size storm yet our Egos leave us to believe its all our fault. Its literally Tea leaves for modern man. Looking for meaning in any place we can for that we cant control or understand.
What's extra frightening is that such a huge proportion of the world's population, and still growing, is living right in the path of that temperature increase.
@@justinjones5281 "Just turn on the air conditioning!" The idiot response I used to get from architects back in the '70s in response to clearly badly designed major buildings.
@@peterbreis5407 "... huge proportion of the world's population, and still growing, is living right in the path of that temperature increase." That should tell you that humans like the warmth and not the cold.
Sometime I hear accents so pronounced they sound like a foreign language. No such problem here, I can understand nearly every accent originating from the British isles.
@@jimwilson946 He has a very annoyingly affected accent. I've never quite worked out what kind of accent he is trying to suppress. I thought he was Irish but does sound it.
Australian here The delay or otherwise of our monsoon has zero to do with our bushfires. These can happen on any and all years but are u s u a l l y worse on el nino years as the south of the continent experiences temperatures in the high 40's to low 50's in these weather patterns receives little or no rain in summer except the wettest la nina year (when the monsoons come 2,000km further south). We even get bushfires in dry southern winters but they are far mor easily contained. Discounting the la nina years (about 1 in 20) where the monsoons come far south our summer rainfaill is consistently very low except the east coast. In el nino years our winters become unusually dry and this coupled with extreme summer heat from constant high pressure cells causes our most massive bushfires. Edit. 2020 was the tailend of a three year elnino. I know the the northern hemisphere claims the el nino occurs in their summer, but it occurs around christmas - the Australian summer. By our winter the el nino had passed as had the bushfires...
Great video, thank you! I knew about the existence of many of these cycles, but it is nice to see them all compiled in one work and also described in such depth.
This is by far one of the most insightful and well-researched videos I've seen! The part at 32:05 was especially eye-opening. I truly wish more people could watch and appreciate this-it’s definitely worth sharing, and I’ll be doing just that!
@@ermpson5799 oh no! The regular recurring natural wildfires that were worse because of bad mismanagement by the government of Canada were worse than normal. The sky is falling. The sky is falling. The sky is falling
We used to call this an Arctic Cold Front. 1984 is in full force right now. Most people, for whatever reasons, lack the intelligence to detect this climate grift or understand why they`re doing it.
When you start speaking about CO2 at around 12:30, why are you showing nuclear cooling towers which emit no CO2? We need more nuclear power, not less, so please do not associate that with carbon emissions.
@@KelticTimclimate change is always happening, but climate change in daily parlance is referring to the Anthropogenic Global Warming hypothesis. That is 100% debatable, especially the "solutions" we see put forth to a problem that can't be proven. All I see is poverty forced on people for a problem that only exists in computer models.
You're like me. BUT, read ths : When I described on a social platform what do I do to relex, (I'd say learn the world around me) the answer I got was kind of "Gesus Christ, what would you be watching if you were worried"
The approximate 50 actively erupting volcanoes spewing CO2 and SO2 into the air certainly helps with greenhouse gases. Tonga's volcano sent steam amounting to 63000 olympic size pools int the Stratosphere. I wonder how our footprint measures up.
Well, the "scientists" are now saying volcanoes have no effect at all...regardless of size or number. Amazing, eh? History is being erased at a record pace.
It's not even measurable... There's actually been a downward trend over the last several hundred years of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere... It's currently at 0.04%... plant life dies entirely at 0.02%... once it drops below 0.03%, certain types of photosynthesis cease to exist. Climate change exists, but the entire idea that humanity caused it, is nothing more than a fraud to wring money out of people... And have them willingly support it!
Our footprint doesn't even begin to touch volcanoes...... One single volcano eruption like Tonga can release 100 years worth of CO2 if it was created by humans. And as you've noted there are always MANY volcanoes spewing CO2 into the atmosphere every single day of the year. That's why the entire thing is a scam. It is nothing but a ploy for power, money, and control. We can all literally end our lives as we know them and start living a truly CO2 NetZero life for every single human on the planet and it wouldn't make a difference if one single supervolcano goes off in the next 10,000 years....... And that's not even including all of the regular volcano activity.....
Not sure if you're familiar with the work on an AMOC collapse explained by Paul Beckwith and others. This scenario is often referred to the mother of all tipping points because of the massive effect it would have on human civilisation over an extremely short period - years, not even decades. There are distinct signs that such a event may be about to commence as a cold blob in the ocean has been forming just below Iceland even as the rest of the ocean increases in temperature, something the tipping point model predicted exactly. Coupled with recent changes in ocean salinity distribution, the signs are that such a scenario may take place by as early as 2050, less than 2 decades from now.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but with regard to the alleged sudden relatively large increase in temperature since 1850, attributed to human activity... is it not true that climate heralds have adjusted temperature records downwards for the intervening period in order to give the impression of a significantly and steadily increasing average temperature? In reality, when considering the unadulterated data, the overall increase has not been around 1 degree, but only a fraction of that AND this comes with a margin of error that could even nullify any apparent increase (or conversely double it, but still below a whole degree). In addition to this, we have the phenomenon of encroachment of development upon weather station sites - we all know about urban heat islands (where towns and cities tend to be warmer than the surrounding countryside). This then causes affected weather stations to register an increase of average temperature over time. The distribution of weather stations is increasingly urbanised, so temperature records are going to appear to increase. The role of CO2 as a greenhouse gas is seriously overstated - the contribution of this trace gas is in the order of hundredths of a degree, in contrast to the effect of atmospheric water vapour, which raises Earth's average surface temperature by 15 degrees. Even if all of the atmospheric CO2 increase in the last couple of hundred years were to be attributed to human activity, mankind's contribution to the warming effect would still only be hundredths of a degree. As for rising sea levels, I only have to think of Al Gore's predictions to see the mockery. Very low-lying parts of the world were supposed to have disappeared beneath the waves by now, but the Inconvenient Truth is that they haven't done so. Unquestionably sea levels do rise and fall, typically over fairly long periods of time (during glaciations and interglacial periods) and certainly slowly enough for people to barely notice over the span of a lifetime. I wouldn't worry. Similarly, I wouldn't worry about an approaching glaciation which is likely to occur over the next several thousand years - mankind (and life on earth) will probably adapt to whatever happens.
Some sources will report the temperature anomaly vs. pre-industrial levels, while others will report it versus a more recent baseline (e.g. 1950-1980). That's why some of the temperature increases might seem smaller and some of the historical levels might seem adjusted downwards on some plots. However, if you look at the delta between any two years on any of these plots, you're going to get about the same result. As the video correctly states, we know the average global temperature with a high degree of accuracy and have for most of the industrial age. There is consensus among scientists that the planet is warming quickly, and that this warming is primarily being caused by humans burning fossil fuels. This is not an urban heat island effect. It's not like scientists have only been taking time series with raw thermometer readings from the planet's cities. We can get temperature via satellite nowadays. And besides, it's just not reasonable to attribute global warming, which there is scientific consensus on, to incompetence in data collection and processing. The temperature anomalies that have been recorded aren't even close to falling within the margin of error. Error bars are in the neighborhood of 0.03 to 0.04 degrees C depending on the data set you're referencing. The anomalies are on the order of 1.3 degrees C versus pre-industrial levels. Please do go look up the data yourself, or just skip to 1:48:34 for a montage; they present the data in a few useful ways. I don't know where you're getting your information about CO2, but you're misinformed. Over the past several hundred thousand years, average global temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration have been tightly coupled. Prior to the industrial revolution, atmospheric CO2 had bounced between about 180 and 280 ppm, with 280 representing a mild period and 180 representing an ice age. We're over 420 ppm now, and going up by close to 3 ppm every year. Water vapor is technically a stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, but it doesn't stay in the atmosphere nearly as long. So, while atmosphere water vapor is certainly a positive feedback on global warming (warmer planet -> more atmospheric water vapor -> warmer planet), that isn't the reason for global warming. The cause is primarily carbon emissions, which is why reducing carbon emissions is the primary focus when trying to address the problem. Its impact is demonstrably much higher than hundredths of a degree, as it is responsible for the majority of the ~1.3 degree C increase we've seen vs. pre-industrial levels, and its tight coupling with temperature farther back in Earth's history. Refer as well to the video, which cited the evolution of plants and cyanobacteria, both of which exchange atmospheric CO2 for O2, as potential causes of massive historical drops in global temperatures. Sea level rise is on the order of 20 cm versus pre-industrial levels. However, the net effect is more pronounced in many coastal cities, as they tend to be sinking, in part due to groundwater pumping and the weight of the buildings. The warmer atmosphere also results in stronger storms, which causes enhanced coastal erosion and worsened flooding. The rate of sea level rise is increasing as well, in part because it's a positive feedback loop (warming oceans -> ice melt -> less energy reflected back into space -> more ice melt), and in part because human CO2 emissions have never been higher (all of our efforts thus far have only slowed the rate of increase; emissions are still growing steadily higher). All of these factors have combined to hammer coastal communities, as predicted. I don't know who was claiming Florida would literally be underwater by now, but that was never a realistic expectation. However, if all land-based ice were to melt, global sea levels would rise on the order of 100 meters (see 1:48:58), and global warming is much more intense in polar regions (see again, 1:48:34; look at the anomalies around the poles that have built up in recent years).
The so-called consensus among scientists is nonsense - it is a consensus of mostly people who don't understand properly and are along for the activist ride, plus people like Gore who simply wanted to make a fortune out of fleecing people with scary messages. The activist voice is very prominent and this threatens academic funding for those who speak up in favour of objectivity, so some voices are silenced and people forced to tow the activist line to keep their funding. As for rising sea levels, check out the Maldives and also ask why so many wealthy people choose to live right at the water's edge. Do they know something the activists don't? By the by, when ice caps melt, the land beneath often springs up as the weight comes off and sea ice melting has zero sea level effect. The Antarctic maximum seasonal sea ice extent has been at record levels in recent years, according to NASA satellite monitoring (since 1971).
These phenomenally excellent productions are costly - understood. The constant ads are annoying and many of us are financially struggling and can't afford to pay for TH-cam Premium or Patreon. So, I grin and bare the reality of watching those few seconds of meaningless ads for the pleasure of enjoying and learning from productions uploaded to this fair and free platform we all know and love - TH-cam 😅
this channel "Sleepy Atom" has taken the transcript from at least one of your videos and present it as one of their own. the AI voice even uses your name and the Astrum channel name. listen at 1:03 in the video they uploaded 3 days ago (the most recent video.)
Thanks for such a fascinating look at the climate and how it changes. You’ve done more to convince me global warming is a fact and we humans have made a contribution to it, than any other source. I love your videos, your level of knowledge is amazing and your teaching ability makes me wish you’d been my physics teacher at school!
For all the people whose complaining about the ads, cuz these days youtube gone way outta the way...Why dont we all sue TH-cam for not paying us, because they are generating income thus we watch, so they are supposed to pay us, not asking us to pay money if we want to watch every content without ads. We are the people that made youtube became the most watched platform on the internet. Lets do this thing...
It would be nice if he talk much about the massive deforestation of our designated rainforest for timbers and land clearance to accommodate industrial grazing ranches. And what is the impact of this action and the chain of reaction of tempering with massive ecosystem? Could our life survive the imbalances of ecosystem. Amazon is now cleared to create ranches and boost Brazil economy. I hope the new government is now regulating and recovered the lands grabbed and illegal acquired by the former president elites.
Lolz that is the funny thing about this guy Zero info or data or explanation of why we have such insane rapid warming. He just kind of glosses over that and says that this is some more advanced thing and right in the beginning he basically tells everyone watching that you're a moron and you should delete whatever you know so that his subsequent 1.9 hours of time completely installs into your brain and replaces whatever you thought before.
@@mansoormannix1753 Yes indeed deforestation, however not so sure if our species' impact on Earth's land has been any more devastating than the oceans, or our atmosphere? if you consider the size of things.
YES!!! Finally someone not speaking propaganda that can admit we don't actually know much when it comes to weather. Because taxing fossil fuels has nothing to do with improving the environment, only artificially driving up it's cost.
Externalities is an economic term for passing the cost of one consumers use of something to others. Using fossil fuels without tax is passing cost to others who are impacted without getting the benefits. Economics doesn't work if you don't have to pay the true costs of use of something, like in communism, the incentive to produce and not consume is absent, and everything breaks down.
Agreed. It just drives up the cost of everyday items, and we all know inflation hits the poor the hardest. What do they do with that tax revenue anyway? If they are taxing it to specifically counter the perceived climate change related to fossil fuels, then why do they also have to pass big spending bills using more tax dollars for climate change? The budget should already exist within the tax revenue received on fossil fuels.
@@ShiniJenkins unfortunately, the atmosphere will run out before the fossil fuels. Methyl hydrates on the ocean floor are orders of magnitude more than our current supply.
@@ShiniJenkins There is no such thing as "fossil fuels", organic compounds simply dont last that long. But as long as things keep dyeing and settling to the bottom of oceans, streams, lakes, and pretty much everywhere living things live like plankton, there should be no shortage. Its when the oil companies create artificial shortages to drive up prices that problems arise. Because if we ever reach peak oil production, it will be done intentionally. We are actually in greater risk of running out of fresh, clean; water.
Fun and all but no matter what we do no matter what we discover the weather is controlled by the Angel Mikael by order of The Creator… The Universe is being expanded daily by The Creator himself… Our impact is huge aswell but it is not a mystery like in the video but it nice to watch
Love the sound of the voice narrating & so happy to have stumbled on this video - I will watch it many many times I am sure to remember the concepts / language of the scienc I love it / fantastic cozy reprieve from all the current news I’ve been watching thank you thank you thank you Love it❤🌎🌌🎩
The world seems to constantly get deeper the closer you look. Even in the most simple areas of life. So I beleive if I dont pursue being an expert in it I should just give "my" current stance to the most nuanced and detailed explaination Ive heard. They have shown the most evidence for the deepest knowledge on the topic. Thank you for making this. Im sure, as with everything, even more nuance exists... there always is... even in the most simple seeming areas of life.
What an incredible and comprehensive video to explain how our climate works and how we are affecting it. Thank you for this gift. This is a real gem. BRAVO!
The is figging excellent. Thank you Alex. I have learned so much about each of these cycles and how they interplay. Some stuff I knew, some I thought I knew. But this has been truly educational.
According to spiritual savant Sri Yukeswars book The Holy Science narrates how the Yugas act as our spiritual evolutionary steering mechanism.We are currently on an ascending spiritual evolutionary trajectory for the next 10k years. I prefer to look upon the yugas as an ascension into the higher chakras. The shift into a higher dimensional reality is just a lame idea that some spiritual teacher hope will sell their books.
@saurabhsurve9247 See book by spiritual savant Sri Yukeswar:The Holy Science narrates how the Yugas act as our spiritual evolutionary steering mechanism.We are currently on an ascending spiritual evolutionary trajectory for the next 10k years. To validate this claim see the massive amounts of information being downloaded into the conscious minds of NDE experiencers. See NDE of Jose Hernandez-ATHEIST DIES AND IS SHOCKED BY WHO HE SEES IN HEAVEN 3 million views. Additionally our next generation are gaining access to the past life memories stored in their subconscious minds. See series-The Ghost Inside my Child.Actual testimonials from children in the west remembering their past lives and beyond. GODSPEED
Did you take into account the declining magnetosphere and the rise in radiation and particles hitting the earth? We may be experiencing an event that has never been seen by homo sapiens before. we have a magnetic north pole that is drifting 55 km per year and the south Atlantic anomaly that is growing in size while the magnetic field is decreasing in strength. How many more of the dynamos are slowing down to reverse. We know it happens but don't have all the evidence to how it happens. This is not accounted for in the Milankovitch cycles. Funny the previous occurrence of this event happens to coincide with the bottleneck in the genus homo 900k years ago.
I’m super happy Astrum put out this 1hr almost 2 video thanks for that I am like many others intrigued by your content as I find it to be informative and calming I learn a lot about space from you and other channels kinda similar like Fraser Kane, PBS Space Time and others for more education thanks again bro!!!
There is growing momentum to remove temperature readings from large cities to reduce the impact of the so-called heat island effect. Once those data are removed the overall increase in global temperature is drastically reduced. The increased temperature caused by the heat retained in concrete surfaces and buildings is anthropogenic, but not as a result of the increased CO2 in the atmosphere.
Humans have been aware of "concrete makes things hot" since the Romans invented it. Scientists use more than one data point before coming to a conclusion and if you had an actual scientific source you'd see that they take the heat island effect into account by taking readings from around the world.
The urban heat island effect is always accounted for. We also see the same warming trend in rural areas, over the ocean hundreds of miles from any form of civilization, and IN the ocean 700 meters down. The Arctic is warming three times faster than the rest of the world. There is no urban heat island effect there. Be aware that this internet mythology is peddled by Anthony Watts of Wattsupwiththat and has no scientific support from credible scientific institutions or studies.
Great video! I was a little nervous about this one since one of the things I enjoy most about your videos is the absence of political banter that has been seeping into everything, but I was not disappointed. One thing that needs to be said about man-made co2 emissions is that any discussion that doesn't include China in particular, and India is a waste of time since they produce the vast majority of co2 emissions and practice other environmentally destructive methods such as the ones used for producing batteries for electric cars. There's not much else that can be done in Western nations that would have any meaningful effect on man-made climate change, but that point is sadly left out of politically charged discussions on the topic for some reason.
Second time around. And loving it still. Conclusion if you study weather you can talk about it . If not no not allowed. Therefore we know we're corrupt, politicians are given more airtime!
Awesome video... I don't know if people will be able to get though all of it. But in summary, the scientific consensus is quite clear... 01:35:00 It's a shame that the subject is being weaponized in political discourse, (although not surprising, considering the power and influence of the fossil fuel industry has on politics). I wished more people believed in science, and not people of power/influence. There's so much noise and misinformation out there. I think this video did a great job in representing every key aspect we know of today, and this video should be able to shield most against all the misinformation campaigns out there...
Saying the "scientific consensus (is clear/settled)" is a politically charged phrase, same with "believing" in science. The "consensus" over Covid was "quite clear" when governments were forcing experimental medicine(s) on people so their donor class could rake in record profits over public health. Then suddenly the "consensus" was a lot less clear when injuries and lawsuits started to climb. Do you know what the medical "consensus" did to the guy who discovered hand washing before surgery stopped disease transmission? They discredited his findings, ruined his career and he eventually died a broken man in an insane asylum. _THAT_ is what "the consensus" does to it's own. It excises challenging thoughts and falls into an echo chamber. Nobody needs to "believe" in science because the scientific method itself _invites_ challenge. Every theory proposed should _want_ to be disproven. That's the heart of the scientific method. When someone says they "believe in the science" what they really mean is they believe in "scientism", which is a religion. The fact that a "consensus" of scientists use climate change like a cudgel against their critics, some of whom are themselves scientists in the same fields of study and have valid counter arguments (the "consensus" did the _exact_ same thing over alternative covid treatments proposed by many doctors, including the guy who invented mRNA vaccination that the shot itself uses), and attack and slander anyone who offers up challenges-- again, antithetical to scientific method, only proves that many fields of science have been captured and corrupted-- including the discussion on climate change, and often because of external, activist/political influences.
We won't come to the answers until money and politics remove themselves from all disciplines of science. At this stage we cannot tell a truth from a lie. Think about it.
You can't tell when their lying? Yipes! If question something then research it. History, which most learned in school, shows us the Earth changes...climate.changes...I remember years ago when I found out were are still in a ice age, I was like ya no. Then I researched. Also our atmosphere is the cleanest its been in decades, nothing to do with obama, Trump or biden. Cow farts, farming, gardening also does not cause climate change.
You can't tell when their lying? Then research it. Please do not tell me you actually believed that cow farts, farming, gardening causes climate change?
Amazing video! Had to watch it in parts because it is so long, but did'nt want to miss anything. Thank you for researching all the facts for us and let us know cleary what is assumption and opinion, and what is not. Favorite part was 'Context is important'!
Nicely presented Alex. Its like a toned-down version of what Suspicious 0bservers channel has delivered over the last 10years. Somewhere in the middle is the more likely outcome.
This video should be shown in school classrooms to students not just in the United States but all over the world. We need more of this type of content to educate the doubters in this world of what is happening to our planet naturally and unnaturally.
Scientists aren't saying this is the hottest the world has ever been. They are saying the earth is the hottest it's been since WE, HUMAN BEINGS, have been around.
Magnificent - you presented all my favorite subjects in one video. Thank you! As to mass extinctions and geomagnetic pole shifts, some claim we are in one mass extinction right now - with loss of species of birds, insects and plants. Earth is an electromagnetic system, we seem to understand the part about magnetism really well - while we do not understand the electric part as well.
El Ninō in Belgium/ the Netherlands = twice mayby trippel amount of Rain and cloudy days....😢 It's raining almost daily since september 2023 till now were are over the anual average ...in only half a year. I mis those Hot El ninā summers already😂😂 Grtz johny geerts
The graph at 1:35 is wrong. It fails to show the Roman and Medieval warm periods, which were warmer than today. It also fails to show the Little Ice Age, which is considered the coldest period in the last 5000 years. It was warmer during the 1930s than today. That's the time of the Dust Bowl when many people moved to California. This is not a theory but a documented fact.Yet your graph doesn't show it. Why? Where did you get that graph? Are you aware that the IPCC scientists manipulated (massaged) temperatures over these time periods. Also NASA and NOAA have been caught manipulating temperatures. They admit this. But there is no excuse for changing data that you don't like just because of an agenda you are promoting.
Those phenomena were regional. Consolidated and correlated global proxy data shows that the “RWP,” the “MWP,” and the “Little Ice Age,” were localized to Europe and the North Atlantic. The global averages shown reflect our currently accepted consensus. Local anomalies are not necessarily reflective of global conditions. The consensus model of rapid climate change is based on global averages. We’ve observed 60 years of data and more from datapoints as disparate as Antarctica and Bangladesh. The data doesn’t lie. Literally millions of science workers aren’t conspiring to live lonely, nerdy lives traveling to brutally remote locations to collect that data. Almost no one gets wealthy off the academia of climate science. Consider this: almost all climate scientists are trained in geology. Oil companies offer EXTREMELY lucrative contracts to geologists to find hydrocarbon reserves. Why tf would anyone choose climatology versus getting fabulously wealthy working for an oil company?
The world all time temperature record occurred in 1934 in Death Valley, CA at 134 degrees F. Libya's 136 degree reading was recently disqualified due to suspicious local reports. In 1936, Kansas recorded its record high of 122 F. But the worldwide average annual temperature has crept upward from 56 degrees F when records began in the 19th century to about 58 degrees as of 2023(?) the most recent year with completed data.
That was a fantastic video. Really informative but also terrifying.. great work Timothy, and your sponsor who made it possible. I think the longer format Really works well.. However I understand how much work you put into each one you create. 👍
Our minds represent the world we feel by our neurons, via energy. Energy is love, gravity is love, we are love, and all is love. There would not exist anything without love, and love without anything
Driving on a Memorial Day road trip. Perfect video for the drive. This is an important, unbiased discussion that I cannot thank you enough for. You have guts to go against the narrative! Good job
I hoped for the same and ended up being really disappointed by the end of a 2 hrs long video. He repeated 100% mainstream narrative. Which I would be fine with, but what was cunning was the clickbaity title pulling in people to watch 2 hrs of exactly 0 controversy.
I've see lots of info about how in the 70s the climate change people were warning about an ice age. My theory is that they created things that would purposely warm the planet and it worked a little too well and now we're dealing with those consequences. I'm sure if we had enough mirrored surfaces deployed strategicly across our lands, we could reflect enough sunlight to reverse the climate mess that these people possibly created. But that would be too simple.
@@old_gaffer The "mainstream narrative" is based on the scientific data described in the video. These facts have been known to scientists for decades before it became mainstream knowledge.
@@ermpson5799 and no one here is arguing that. I pointed out the fact that the original title of the video was "my most controversial video on YT...." and there was no controversy whatsoever in it. so don't get triggered for no reason.
I hate the clickbaity title "This will be the most controvercial video on youtube" It immediatly made me want to ignore the video! What was wrong with "A Shift in the Earth's Cycles Is Coming" Simple and interesting! In spite of this I will listen to it!
@@duanefentiman They are really good and I want them to be better. If you share this clip, then I find the shared title clickbaity.. That made me not want to click it. For someone who has never seen or heard an astrum video before that can make or break my interest. The only thing that made me click it was my trust in the one sharing it.
Alex, i thank you for your explanation of all of this. I studied geology and paleoecology and climatogy. I knew all about Milankovitch cycles and orbit eccentricity, even that the sun is slowly getting hotter, but i must have missed all the parts about axial wobble. Thanks for explaining it with such great visuals to help. Another great presentation!
This is probably the most comprehensive, understandable and focused content in this topic I have ever watched. This should be localized to dozens of languages and aired in schools. Respect.
Yeeahh. Except.. Climate change is a hoax.
This is the best summarization of the climate I've seen. It's rare I see the solar cycle discussed to the point of nucleation sites. I wish you had discussed the long-term brightening of our sun (models vary, but scientists estimate the sun was 30% dimmer during the time of the dinosaurs than today), as well as vulcanism.
Regardless, this is the most comprehensive video I've seen and I wish more people would see it. I know I'll be sharing it with people.
Thank you for the kind words and for supporting the channel!
Weren't there also really old stories that suggested at one point the earth was in perpetual twilight, and that something happened at some point in the distant past, that made the sun way brighter and hotter? I can't recall WHERE I heard that story, just that it had something to do with "the mystery schools" and some knowledge passed down within. Very interesting though - and something I find entirely plausible.
For some reason the censors won`t allow me to type this number, but it`s FIVE-THIRTY-SIX, the year, and it was the beginning of a terrible period of suffering due to vulcanism. Sulphur compound spikes are present in ice at both poles. Today it would be far worse since we`re completely unprepared which is hard to believe. This relatively stable temperature period for the past 5000 years will abruptly end one day. Our corn, wheat, rice, beans and fruits won`t be able to be produced and livestock won`t be fed. And no preparations are in place to ease the fall. That isn`t very smart and it`s baffling.
@@baneverything5580 536, did it work?
@@baneverything5580wouldn't the sulfur indicate massive volcanic eruptions?
I wonder if youtube knows that their excessive ads make people want to NEVER buy from the advertisers. Its just obnoxious
You mean AI generated garbage (using celebrity voices) isnt convincing enough? Joe Rogan just told me how to increase my IQ by taking one simple supplement! I want to believe.
Advertisers wouldn't do it if it didn't work.
@@holopeve I think you are overestimating the intelligence of these advertisers. It is a matter of volume that creates the return not the actual advert. Hell, I could sell lawn clippings using the same technique I bet.
@@resignator You just argued their point...
The entire conversation is based on "too many ads", the responder said "it must work", you said "no its because of the volume that makes it work at all".... That is literally saying the too many ads obviously works...
You tube only cares that the advertisers pay them to advertise. Not necessarily if the adverts make money for themselves.. Though one is connected to the other.
If you have great distain for adverts, like i do, just install adblock and have a much much much better life on youtube.
I literally dont have tv or radio because i despise adverts with a passion. I am on youtube all day every day and havent had an advert in a decade.
1816 The global "Year without summer (big freeze)" 3°C temperature drop and crop failures. April 1815, volcano Mount Tambora began to violently erupt. Millions of tons of ash, dust, and sulfur dioxide were released into the atmosphere, casting a temporary chill across the planet as it Blocked out the Sunlight for months on end. Documented around the world in literature.
What goes up must come down!
Our atmospheric filtration system is one of the best around!
We are facing a global intinction event in less than 50 yrs.if we continue to heat up the planet in 29 yrs all crops will fail and there wil be no food after that most animals will die out.
See NATURE, Issue 486, pages 240-242 (2012) "A Signature of Cosmic Ray Increase in A.D.774-775 rom ancient tree rings Japan. F.Miyake et. al. of Nagyoa Univecsitym Japan. They dscovered spikes in C-14 and Be-10 in indviual tree rings, which was correlated with the same spikes in ancient ICE CORES--- and MIYAKE says she beleve the origin of this "Storm" of PROTONS & NEURONS cam from OUTER SPACE (likely solar "Supernovae" screaming in after speedn at light-speed though empy space until stiking the outer starosphere and changing N-14 into C-14!
Around 1750 AD (during the middle of a 400 years long cold period) we had CO2 at 180ppm. By 1950 CO2 had reached 200ppm but temperatures had warmed faster than the CO2 built up. Today we have 400ppm CO2 but temperatures, measured via ice core data, have hardly moved and have possibly got colder. CO2 does not seem to have the warming effect we are constantly told it has.
@@Dave5843-d9mAgree.
Danke!
My favorite way to go to sleep, gently lullabied by his lilting voice telling us of our future horrors. Yet it’s not nightmare fuel. That’s talent. He’s like the Bob Ross of science.
You will love PBS space time then. Dr. Matt’s voice is like molasses
Bob Ross made different and unique art. Not regurgitated information
All science is regurgitated information
@avo616 I believe the comparison has to deal with the mood , vibe that they both give out and put the audience in.
I find it terrible for sleep, cause it's too interesting. I need to watch these multiples times for them to become proper lullabies later on.
Are you serious? I was just browsing for a video to watch along my meal, refresh and what do I see? An almost 2 hour Astrum video posted a minute ago. Thanks man!
Edit: What exactly in my comment makes disappointingly many people assume that I eat for 2 hours straight? You people do comprehend, that a video can be continued being watched after one has finished eating, no?
Right? The timing is perfect!
Having a late breakfast. 🥰
Same here except 26 minutes ago.
Be thankful it's not the like 24 hours video he posted last month. Heh...
2 hours of propoganda. What could be better than that?
I don't think I've ever learned more about weather in 2 hrs. If not for the all mighty astrum I'd have zoned out. Truly fascinating
Melinkovich cycles are the reason why I only feed my cows re-fied and baked beans to produce all of the farts and I leave all my equipment on my farm perpetually idling when not in use. You can thank me when the earth does not turn into a snowball.
Thank you for your service! 😂
You are a hoot. So funny.
Bedankt. 💤🛌
Dear Astrum team
I want to congratulate you on this beautiful production of almost two hours on the discussion of global warming.
The extensive scientific research that you addressed and delved into is simply brilliant.
Bravo !!!
I am a Geologist and yes, climate change is scary, but through this documentary, you manage to bring the true and essential substrate necessary for us to understand the relevance and responsibility of our role as human beings within this complex cycle that has governed our planet for more than 4 billion years.
Continue to improve knowledge of astronomy and science in general with your videos.
Once again, congratulations to everyone on the team and especially to you, Alex McColgan, for the wonderful work leading your Astrum.
It's not that scary
@@tetrasphere8165 yeah it is. This last week has been unbelievable. It’s so frightening so many people have died so many people lost their homes. If you don’t think that’s frightening then you might be a sociopath.
@@Jude74 I've worked for 4+ environmental groups but the fear is ridiculous. Being afraid of car farts and cow farts is silly. Respect the earth regardless and just keep in mind that on the day we get our so called footprint down to near zero, is the day a volcano blots out the sun. Also our technology will catch up before we have to start shitting our pants.
I would bet my doctrate that you are not the sharpest pick in the case.
Our planet was formed 4 billion years ago according to the new scientists carbon dated. But it took almost 3 billion to transform from big ball field with ocean of magma, slowly cooled down due to excessive CO², Sulphur Dioxide, emitted through the empty space filled with vacuum and push it while creating our atmosphere millions of average meteorite continue to bombard the earth from far solar system due to new created solar that introduce new gravitational energy. Our earth after covered with gases emitted from lava ball covered the earth surfaces and reduce the solar heat then our earth started cooling leaving behind solid compact but delicate mineral while the chemical reaction that gives the sun it's energy continue to burn and melting irons plate and leave stone behind to form the different types of solid spread crust. and the process never stopped till today. The earth have experience 3 ice age in 4 billion. Our earth still have another 2 billion years of enjoying life as it cycling around the sun.
Solar cycles also affect the polar vortex. Solar maximums put more energy into the atmosphere causing increases in the variability of the polar vortexes. At solar minimums the polar vortexes are basically circular.
Solar cycles have also been linked to the magnetic connections between the earth and saturn.
Magnetic connections between the sun and planets is at least as important as the gravitaional connections.
Also affecting the heliosphere is the cyclical connections with galactic influences.
Good job. Well put together discusion.
Some would say gravity & magnetism are one in the same.
They are not at all
@@ichigo199 So you're correct & Nikola Tesla is wrong? 🤔
@@user-ue5yw6zb9k only for ferrite
Absolutely awesome presentation, my gratitude.
I was talking with someone I just met about things in general, then when I brought up “ climate warming “, he responds :that is not the case but rather a fabrication by the powers that be, to control us 🤨 , but then he say that the sun is coming to a cycle where it goes dormant, creating an ice age. And so he left me very confused and disheartened about it all.
Having a clear data , can help the whole of us to be on the same page, and there is our first step towards resolution, because I don’t think any one in their right mind would object to saving our planet, ‘less you are mad ,; what can be more important,
We should talk about what needs to be balanced, such as : a life style that is not sustainable, we should take a breather , also the balance between technology and spirituality; it seems to me that what is happening with our planet is a reflection of some thing off in our judgment and maturity as a species, certainly we don’t want to do harm to our own home/ planet/selves, or the “party” to end, or do we ?😂😮😢, much love and respect, those of us that are becoming increasingly aware of the situation, have our hands full, blessings…
Nobody is denying climate change, the point is the sun is the biggest driver of it, not the 0.02% co2 in the atmosphere. It's not man made, and governments can't tax the sun, but they can you and I
Be careful. There was a time that we were all convinced that burning witches would keep us safer.
The vast majority of co2 emissions are produced by China and India. People in Western countries can reduce their carbon footprint to 0 and it would only be a drop in the bucket compared to China. Any discussion about climate change that doesn't address China's role is just a waste of time and people that want to feel good about "saving the planet" by just blowing smoke up each others' bums
Danke sehr!!! - solch gut gemachter Film !!!
Might i suggest the Suspicious Observer channel, Ben knows his facts and speaks with clarity!
Ben is an alright source for some information, but don't drink too much of his Kool-Aid.
Ben thinks that geomagnetic induced current can melt steel. He also thinks steel melted during the Carrington event. He is confused about what exactly will be happen when his fantasy micro nova occurs. Even if we had a micro nova, the earths shield is limited in how much energy it can generate from its movement. Ben believes rubber will block induction. He confused E1pulse with E3. If we get currents either induces or direct pulse energy strong enough to melt steel, we are all goners immediately, like that of a lightning strike. Hitting every square inch of the earth. I could go on, but won't because Ben sounds like he knows what he is talking about about because that is what cult leaders sound like, it's a confidence game. Cheers.
@@SacredOwl bro micro nova are a thing, there are papers on them now. Get your facts right before you start trying to correct people...
Interesting to note that it was to Doug Vogt that the US government turned when S4488 was amended, and how L ALvarez called him to enquire 'How he figured it all out' decades before S0me people were aware... Interesting too that the Russian authorities also recognise Vogt's 47 years of diligent research.
I understand Ben turns 40 this year...
6:40 FYI at this part(so far in your video) is incorrect. Paradoxically Earth is warmer when it is farther from the Sun. This is due to the seasonal effect of the uneven distribution of land and water between the northern and southern hemispheres.
July, when Earth is at its most distant, is also summer for the northern hemisphere. The north has more land which heats faster than water. January, when Earth is closest to the Sun, is summer for the southern hemisphere dominated by oceans which respond more slowly to the increase in the Sun’s energy.
The tilt in Earth’s axis produces almost 20 times the effect of the changing distance from the Sun, and the difference in local geography is 2 to 3 times more important than the changing distance.
We make our closest approach to the Sun (147.5 million km) in January, that's called perihelion, and we're farthest from the Sun (152.6 million km) in July, that's aphelion.
"Averaged over the globe, sunlight falling on Earth in July (aphelion) is indeed about 7% less intense than it is in January (perihelion)." That's the good news. The bad news is it's still hot. "In fact the average temperature of Earth at aphelion is about 4° F (2.3° C) higher than it is at perihelion." Earth is actually warmer when we're farther from the Sun!
How can that be? It's because our planet is --in a sense-- lopsided. Continents and oceans aren't distributed evenly around the globe. There's more land in the northern hemisphere and more water in the south. During the month of July --near the start of northern summer-- the land-crowded northern half of our planet is tilted toward the Sun. "Earth's temperature (averaged over the entire globe) is slightly higher in July because the Sun is shining down on all that land, which heats up rather easily," says Spencer.
Solar heating raises the temperature of continents more than water because the heat capacity of land is lower. Bill Patzert, an oceanographer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory explains: "The temperature of land changes easily, which is what we mean by low heat capacity. Consider the desert: At night the desert is cold, perhaps only 60° F. When the Sun rises in the morning the temperature might jump to 100° F or more." Such mercurial behavior is characteristic of materials like rocks and soil with little thermal inertia. It doesn't take much sunlight to substantially elevate their temperature.
"On the other hand," says Patzert, "oceans have a tremendous heat capacity. They tend to keep [the energy] they capture and are very stingy about giving it back." This quality moderates the temperature swings of ocean environments. "Let's say you went sailing off Malibu Beach at noon," says Patzert. "The offshore temperature might be 75° F -- pretty pleasant!" What happens after sunset? "The temperature drops, but only a few degrees because the thermal inertia of the ocean is so high."
All this explains why July is our planet's warmest month: Northern continents baked by the aphelion Sun elevate the average temperature of the entire globe. Six months later, in January, the situation is reversed as our planet presents its water-dominated hemisphere to the Sun. "We're closer to the Sun in January," says Spencer, "but the extra sunlight gets spread throughout the oceans." Southern summer in January (perihelion) is therefore cooler than northern summer in July (aphelion). Strange but true!
Another notable difference between summers in the two hemispheres is their duration," adds Lebo. According to Kepler's 2nd Law, planets move more slowly at aphelion than they do at perihelion. As a result, Northern summer on Earth is 2 to 3 days longer than southern summer -- which gives the Sun even more time to bake the northern continents.[1]
The fact that people living in the northern hemisphere are warmer when near aphelion is primarily due to the seasons, which are caused by the tilt of our axis. The fact that the Earth as a whole is also warmer when near aphelion is due to the difference in geography between the two hemispheres (mostly water in southern hemisphere, water and land in the northern hemisphere). In numerical terms, the tilt of our axis produces almost 20 times the effect of our changing distance from the Sun, and the difference in local geography is 2 to 3 times more important than the changing distance.
TL;DR: Earth's land is not evenly distributed and the thermal inertia and heat capacity of the Oceans is different than that of land, plus a bunch of other factors. Basically we're out of phase with what you'd expect based on the distance alone.
Your analysis is correct but so is the presenter's - he doesn't contest the actual overall temperature effect on the earth, and correctly shows that it is changing. Northern hemisphere gets milder summers compared to southern - that's fact.
👆🤓
Your comments are very well written as they show & explain the complexities of Earth's weather & climates in each hemisphere - thank you
I think you just explained why we're not in an ice age.
I love this outlook of the wooble flip. But does anyone really think we could exist forever? The earth does not need us. It will be fine.
So will Venus
i don’t think we’re going anywhere anytime soon. even if just a few of us survive i think we’ll bounce back. probably look different by that time
Earth doesn't need us, never did because we don't belong here like this, humans are no more than an infected scab on mother Gaia. One day our presence will be nothing but a scar, a reminder of a small failure, what not to do.
😅😅😅
We are the worst thing on earth!!
Hopefully humans don't!!
I do think we have to make something of self conscious. Of all earths species we humans have arguably the most time to acknowledge our time on earth beyond that of mere survival. There has to be meaning , but first as a collective species, we have to respect our mortality. Soo many trivial distractions plague us. I believe we’re getting there though.
The more I've learned about our power grid & our climate, the more i realize that modern nuclear energy is our best option. LFTRs, Thorium Reactors, molten salt reactors, etc. Utilizing our advanced technology, Improved engineering & material science. Utilizing our greater understanding of safety & well made designs. We have so much more advanced computer technology & robotics that can be used. It feels like even tho tons of advancement has occurred with engineering designs, safety measures, etc. It still doesn't matter to most people. It's like most people are ingrained with a natural negative response when talking about nuclear energy. It's a bummer because i truly believe that our best option for our future is to start utilizing Modern advanced nuclear energy options in our electrical grid. It's just proving to be challenging to get politicians to get on board.
It will really allow places to be much more energy independent. Less reliant on fossil fuels. They'll have efficient, stable electrical grids and the rest of the grid could experiment with alternative power sources, power desalination plants, etc.
We need to heal from the trauma of our past. See & learn that those things only happened solely from Us not understanding what we were doing when it came to nuclear energy at the time. We didn't have advanced enough technology, material science, engineering, safety measures, understanding of how to go about everything, etc. This source of energy will greatly help the world improve towards the future and lowering emissions. More than anything else could, while also providing a very stable electrical grid system. Currently we have alternative energy options but the majority of our grid is powered off of fossil fuels and emission producing sources of energy. We will be so much better going forward commiting to modern advanced nuclear energy options.
It's been very irritating that our society has taken this "Change is up to you" approach. It just takes advantage of people's emotions. This climate issue is so much bigger than any one individual. This needs to be an across the board kind of thing. That's the only way we might make the Slightest difference. We've already waited too long. Everyday is a day wasted. A day where we haven't committed to modern nuclear energy options. Where we haven't even started building it. It should be utilized in collaboration with other alternative energy sources all over the place. This power source is the best option to improve our environment & will really help lower our emissions. The only thing holding us back is legislation, fear mongering & past trauma that's affected us from our past failures (which is understandable but I know we can do better now. We've learned so much sense then. We gotta give it a shot. It's such a beneficial energy source when done right)
Did they outlaw electricity, oil, natural gas or coal when things went wrong in the early days of those fields? No! They kept going and understood things usually are bumpy and difficult in the beginning and kept going even tho those sources negatively impacted our environment. A huge issue is our government is BLOCKING any sort of progression from happening. Will be lucky to see the slightest projects approved or finished with-in the next 100 years.. It's very annoying to see how much we have gotten in our own way when it comes to improving or advancing certain things. Instead we let fear, money, man made "required legal processes" Stop us from doing anything other than wind, solar, oil, natural gas, damming our rivers, mining for minerals... It's very frustrating because we should be able to use all these options in collaboration. If we actually wanted to improve anything. That's what we need to do and stop letting so much potential get blocked from ever occurring in the first place.. It's really irritating. I wish certain people didn't make this so "complicated and difficult" Why would any reasonable person want to block progression?
Because they are making billions selling oil...
There are some good thoughts in here. Something for you to consider: What parts of this are driven by your own emotions, and what emotions are they?
Over time science and business have come up with ever-increasing ways of being stupid and greedy. We have had: lead pigmented paint, leaded gasoline, dioxin from imperfect manufacturing, phthalate in plastic, asbestos, etc etc Microplastics may be killing us all. Without regulations we'd all be dead by now and most birds would be extinct
@@TheBcoolGuy are you implying his initial point that we should utilize nuclear is moot because the rest of his post is full of idealism and the realization of how fucked the world is? Strip the discussion of emotions, and look at it pragmatically, and nuclear is the much better option. ANd im not talking about those reactors built in the 50's. Im talking current designs like OP mentioned. Breeder reactors are undeniably one of the best ways to generate energy, with minimal human input, and tiny carbon footprint. Its about as automated as you can get with energy generation, hence why nuclear is so damn cheap. Not to mention, the literal only waste is STEAM. Coal is also more radioactive than even current nuclear reactors, which is WILD to me, considering the biggest argument against nuclear is the radiation.
Please keep comments to one or two sentences. Geez.
Thanks
00:08 Earth's climate is governed by complex cycles.
03:13 Earth's orbit and tilt influence temperature changes
09:18 Earth's tilt and rotation influencing ice ages
12:18 Earth's cycles, including Milankovitch cycles and El Niño Southern Oscillation, impact global temperatures and climate.
18:27 Shifts in Pacific Jet Stream lead to global weather impacts
21:35 La Niña shifts Earth's cycles with varied regional impacts
27:36 Earth's atmospheric winds have complex polar vortexes
30:39 Coriolis force redirects winds to create jet streams.
36:27 Sudden Stratospheric Warming can lead to significant jet stream reversals.
39:29 Imbalances in global temperatures lead to Jetstream shifts.
45:26 Earth's core acts as a giant dynamo
48:25 The Earth's magnetic field is precarious and constantly fluctuating.
54:33 Earth's magnetic field weakening and the potential impact on society
57:23 The Sun's cycles may significantly impact life on Earth
1:03:26 The Sun's cycle mystery and its impact on Earth
1:06:20 Geomagnetic storms affect technology and ecosystems
1:12:08 The Earth is facing a shift in the Moon's cycles.
1:15:11 Lunar nodes influence tidal extremes
1:21:04 Lunar nodal cycle affects mangrove canopy cover
1:23:58 Polders, dams, and sand dunes protect against water
1:25:51 Global warming is causing unexpected changes on Earth.
1:28:46 Understanding past global temperatures through ice core and Foraminifera analysis.
1:34:47 Rapid rise in global temperatures is concerning due to its quick pace.
1:37:53 Human activity is significantly impacting global temperatures through greenhouse gas emissions.
1:44:26 Impact of global temperature change on species survival
1:47:30 Climate change is happening rapidly, and we need fundamental changes to stop it.
Crafted by AI ?
this video feels very natural and quite well written, plus this channel has been producing videos on a similar quality for years, so despite the growth of AI in the past year, i really doubt it
@@Skyymon don't bother, conspiracy nuts will conspiracy.
No thank you ( as a blanket solution). We need some transparency as to what is already being manipulated, by who and why. No the real why!
Let me help you to look at it differently. One volcano eruption is equal to all human influences for one year. So if the solar magnetic energy is being absorbed in the earths core that causes more volcanic activity and we get 4-5 more per year one can understand the co2 rise. Imho climate change is real but humanity isn’t as big as a factor as the globalist claim. The globalist have used cc to give them authority. They have plans to control every aspect of your life. 15 minute cities, control food supply, digital money that can be controlled. Eventually they will require you join the system or die. They will require you to worship them. A global money, a global government, a global religion. And eventually a chip underneath your skin that can control your money, your health, and eventually your thoughts. Transhumanism. They have told us the future and most on here will call me a conspiracy theorist. Most ignore the facts that de population has already begun. Put your trust in the creator. Read more. Find the truth. Cc is real but the globalist are using it to bring in globalism. I suggest following a TH-cam channel called suspicious observers. He reports on cc and many studies that don’t get public attention. Peace to all and love each other.
@@Superior.scenicmoodswhy do people believe someone very powerful can alter and manipulate the nature? The only power so powerful that can alter the natural process of our earth is the same force that commanded all the energy to act together colliding on each other to cause friction to ignite highly explosive energy that left debris burning Ashes and gases into the space and everything works precisely to form what we see today. Only that power can command the same forces not to work again. The biggest thing we human can build to life on earth is nuclear and hydrogen bombs. 😂😂😂
I live in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, we are experiencing an extreme Flood even bigger than the one in Peru like you showed, and it was partially because of the El Niño as well, the power of the elements in our earth are insurmoutable, we can't really predict or overcome them right now, and yet we influence it so much
Things that make you go hmmmmmm
É terrível o que estamos vivendo aqui. Sem precedentes na história e, mesmo assim, nem mesmo outros brasileiros parecem entender a dimensão do desastre.
The cosmic rays coming through the souther anomaly could be creating more rain, I have read that cosmic rays couse cloud nucleation; not sure how stronge the evidence is though.
Grass is taking over the earth. These days it seems like I have to mow every single week, if not twice sometimes. I'm consumed by my ideology of the rise of grass.
Do we influence is so much though? Man covers almost none of the Earth. Our Energy usage and output is not even near even that of a mid size storm yet our Egos leave us to believe its all our fault. Its literally Tea leaves for modern man. Looking for meaning in any place we can for that we cant control or understand.
Watching from Rajasthan
Todays Temperature was 47.8 ‘Celsius
Dude!!!! Do you have underground lifestyles? Wild
What's extra frightening is that such a huge proportion of the world's population, and still growing, is living right in the path of that temperature increase.
@@justinjones5281 "Just turn on the air conditioning!"
The idiot response I used to get from architects back in the '70s in response to clearly badly designed major buildings.
@@peterbreis5407 "... huge proportion of the world's population, and still growing, is living right in the path of that temperature increase."
That should tell you that humans like the warmth and not the cold.
@@pulsar22Not the kind of warmth that kills you though which is what's happening in india & asia right now & it's come early too
I just love how Astrum pronounces ”earth”. It’s like ”örth”, the sound that the Swedish letter ö makes, if a bit more nasal.
It's a south Welsh vowel sound I believe
Sometime I hear accents so pronounced they sound like a foreign language. No such problem here, I can understand nearly every accent originating from the British isles.
So he pronounces wrong then
No he pronounces it correctly for his part of Britain.
@@jimwilson946 He has a very annoyingly affected accent. I've never quite worked out what kind of accent he is trying to suppress. I thought he was Irish but does sound it.
Wonderfully done. 💕 Thank you for the detailed and thorough production of this compilation.
Australian here
The delay or otherwise of our monsoon has zero to do with our bushfires. These can happen on any and all years but are
u s u a l l y worse on el nino years as the south of the continent experiences temperatures in the high 40's to low 50's in these weather patterns receives little or no rain in summer except the wettest la nina year (when the monsoons come 2,000km further south). We even get bushfires in dry southern winters but they are far mor easily contained. Discounting the la nina years (about 1 in 20) where the monsoons come far south our summer rainfaill is consistently very low except the east coast. In el nino years our winters become unusually dry and this coupled with extreme summer heat from constant high pressure cells causes our most massive bushfires.
Edit. 2020 was the tailend of a three year elnino. I know the the northern hemisphere claims the el nino occurs in their summer, but it occurs around christmas - the Australian summer. By our winter the el nino had passed as had the bushfires...
Many of our fires are fire bugs unfortunately
This narrator is so good at speach and oration, "I" actually look forward to learning.
Thats not how the word speech is spelled and why is I in quotation marks?
@@Mr.SugeWhite What else would you expect from a user who's last name probably got him tea-bagged all through high school? 🤣
i feel so much more informed after watching your video!
Great video, thank you!
I knew about the existence of many of these cycles, but it is nice to see them all compiled in one work and also described in such depth.
This is by far one of the most insightful and well-researched videos I've seen! The part at 32:05 was especially eye-opening. I truly wish more people could watch and appreciate this-it’s definitely worth sharing, and I’ll be doing just that!
Thanks!
You're a brave man!!! I'm gonna have to watch this again in a few days and see what comments you get........
Florida was supposed to be underwater 10 years ago
@@ScientistBaffled Thank goodness it's not. The wildfires have been worse than expected unfortunately.
@@ermpson5799 expected? sounds like modelling.....
@@crabbyr6929trees aren't even real
@@ermpson5799 oh no! The regular recurring natural wildfires that were worse because of bad mismanagement by the government of Canada were worse than normal. The sky is falling. The sky is falling. The sky is falling
Polar vortex dipping South is a good time to go out at night to get you a Subway footlong.
just be sure its really really late at night, and beware of others in the neighborhood wearing red hats..... that's a bad sign.
We used to call this an Arctic Cold Front. 1984 is in full force right now. Most people, for whatever reasons, lack the intelligence to detect this climate grift or understand why they`re doing it.
@@baneverything5580were Exxon's & Shell's leaked documents expressing climate change concerns from 40 years ago a grift as well?
Is this a Smollett reference?
@@tipfertool5457 They are BOTH hoaxes...
When you start speaking about CO2 at around 12:30, why are you showing nuclear cooling towers which emit no CO2? We need more nuclear power, not less, so please do not associate that with carbon emissions.
Because this channel propagates the climate change myth
@@Bulletproof_Trump We still need more nuclear power, not less. But irrational climate wackos don't like nuclear either I suppose.
@@Bulletproof_Trumpit’s not a myth, it’s happening, what’s debatable is just how much we effect it and what the actual issues are that arise from it.
@@Bulletproof_Trump hurrrr durr
@@KelticTimclimate change is always happening, but climate change in daily parlance is referring to the Anthropogenic Global Warming hypothesis. That is 100% debatable, especially the "solutions" we see put forth to a problem that can't be proven.
All I see is poverty forced on people for a problem that only exists in computer models.
i literally go to sleep to these. so interesting but also relaxing. it keeps my mind occupied
You're like me. BUT, read ths : When I described on a social platform what do I do to relex, (I'd say learn the world around me) the answer I got was kind of "Gesus Christ, what would you be watching if you were worried"
Good luck with the 1-hour long ads that they sneak in late at night. haha
@@timadams3975 you don't have adblock?
No one really knows. No one. However, I am glad that there are truth seekers out there.
Thank you once again, Alex. Your documentaries are excellent and so instructive. They always bring us good information.
Thanks!
TO ME >> THE LA NINO AND NINLA > ITS ON THE "RING OF FIRE" THERE IS WARMING UNDER THE OCEAN .. THIS HEAT CAUSES WEATHER CHANGES
Thank you for assembling all this information in such a clear and informative way. Well done!
The approximate 50 actively erupting volcanoes spewing CO2 and SO2 into the air certainly helps with greenhouse gases. Tonga's volcano sent steam amounting to 63000 olympic size pools int the Stratosphere. I wonder how our footprint measures up.
Well, the "scientists" are now saying volcanoes have no effect at all...regardless of size or number. Amazing, eh? History is being erased at a record pace.
I'd like to know this too
It's not even measurable... There's actually been a downward trend over the last several hundred years of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere... It's currently at 0.04%... plant life dies entirely at 0.02%... once it drops below 0.03%, certain types of photosynthesis cease to exist.
Climate change exists, but the entire idea that humanity caused it, is nothing more than a fraud to wring money out of people... And have them willingly support it!
Our footprint doesn't even begin to touch volcanoes...... One single volcano eruption like Tonga can release 100 years worth of CO2 if it was created by humans. And as you've noted there are always MANY volcanoes spewing CO2 into the atmosphere every single day of the year.
That's why the entire thing is a scam. It is nothing but a ploy for power, money, and control. We can all literally end our lives as we know them and start living a truly CO2 NetZero life for every single human on the planet and it wouldn't make a difference if one single supervolcano goes off in the next 10,000 years....... And that's not even including all of the regular volcano activity.....
@@snoutysnouterson Barley anything compared to what humanity is releasing, Just so you know we measure our releases in Gigatons of Co2
Not sure if you're familiar with the work on an AMOC collapse explained by Paul Beckwith and others. This scenario is often referred to the mother of all tipping points because of the massive effect it would have on human civilisation over an extremely short period - years, not even decades. There are distinct signs that such a event may be about to commence as a cold blob in the ocean has been forming just below Iceland even as the rest of the ocean increases in temperature, something the tipping point model predicted exactly. Coupled with recent changes in ocean salinity distribution, the signs are that such a scenario may take place by as early as 2050, less than 2 decades from now.
This is such a fantastic overview. Calm and fact based with original research videos. Thank you.
¡Gracias!
This is what I’ve been waiting for. The 2hrs long before bed. My anxiety ass needs this before sleep 🤌🏼
Exercise is healthier
Btw a Asteroid can hit any day, any hour any minute…. Sleep tight.
@@stargazer4683 that’s will be blessed. This world is fucked up
I still don't understand how his voice knocks me out every night
@@nahbreddaaa32 same Astrum and Isaac Arthur are my friends
Correct me if I'm wrong, but with regard to the alleged sudden relatively large increase in temperature since 1850, attributed to human activity... is it not true that climate heralds have adjusted temperature records downwards for the intervening period in order to give the impression of a significantly and steadily increasing average temperature?
In reality, when considering the unadulterated data, the overall increase has not been around 1 degree, but only a fraction of that AND this comes with a margin of error that could even nullify any apparent increase (or conversely double it, but still below a whole degree).
In addition to this, we have the phenomenon of encroachment of development upon weather station sites - we all know about urban heat islands (where towns and cities tend to be warmer than the surrounding countryside). This then causes affected weather stations to register an increase of average temperature over time. The distribution of weather stations is increasingly urbanised, so temperature records are going to appear to increase.
The role of CO2 as a greenhouse gas is seriously overstated - the contribution of this trace gas is in the order of hundredths of a degree, in contrast to the effect of atmospheric water vapour, which raises Earth's average surface temperature by 15 degrees. Even if all of the atmospheric CO2 increase in the last couple of hundred years were to be attributed to human activity, mankind's contribution to the warming effect would still only be hundredths of a degree.
As for rising sea levels, I only have to think of Al Gore's predictions to see the mockery. Very low-lying parts of the world were supposed to have disappeared beneath the waves by now, but the Inconvenient Truth is that they haven't done so. Unquestionably sea levels do rise and fall, typically over fairly long periods of time (during glaciations and interglacial periods) and certainly slowly enough for people to barely notice over the span of a lifetime. I wouldn't worry. Similarly, I wouldn't worry about an approaching glaciation which is likely to occur over the next several thousand years - mankind (and life on earth) will probably adapt to whatever happens.
Some sources will report the temperature anomaly vs. pre-industrial levels, while others will report it versus a more recent baseline (e.g. 1950-1980). That's why some of the temperature increases might seem smaller and some of the historical levels might seem adjusted downwards on some plots. However, if you look at the delta between any two years on any of these plots, you're going to get about the same result. As the video correctly states, we know the average global temperature with a high degree of accuracy and have for most of the industrial age. There is consensus among scientists that the planet is warming quickly, and that this warming is primarily being caused by humans burning fossil fuels. This is not an urban heat island effect. It's not like scientists have only been taking time series with raw thermometer readings from the planet's cities. We can get temperature via satellite nowadays. And besides, it's just not reasonable to attribute global warming, which there is scientific consensus on, to incompetence in data collection and processing.
The temperature anomalies that have been recorded aren't even close to falling within the margin of error. Error bars are in the neighborhood of 0.03 to 0.04 degrees C depending on the data set you're referencing. The anomalies are on the order of 1.3 degrees C versus pre-industrial levels. Please do go look up the data yourself, or just skip to 1:48:34 for a montage; they present the data in a few useful ways.
I don't know where you're getting your information about CO2, but you're misinformed. Over the past several hundred thousand years, average global temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration have been tightly coupled. Prior to the industrial revolution, atmospheric CO2 had bounced between about 180 and 280 ppm, with 280 representing a mild period and 180 representing an ice age. We're over 420 ppm now, and going up by close to 3 ppm every year. Water vapor is technically a stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, but it doesn't stay in the atmosphere nearly as long. So, while atmosphere water vapor is certainly a positive feedback on global warming (warmer planet -> more atmospheric water vapor -> warmer planet), that isn't the reason for global warming. The cause is primarily carbon emissions, which is why reducing carbon emissions is the primary focus when trying to address the problem. Its impact is demonstrably much higher than hundredths of a degree, as it is responsible for the majority of the ~1.3 degree C increase we've seen vs. pre-industrial levels, and its tight coupling with temperature farther back in Earth's history. Refer as well to the video, which cited the evolution of plants and cyanobacteria, both of which exchange atmospheric CO2 for O2, as potential causes of massive historical drops in global temperatures.
Sea level rise is on the order of 20 cm versus pre-industrial levels. However, the net effect is more pronounced in many coastal cities, as they tend to be sinking, in part due to groundwater pumping and the weight of the buildings. The warmer atmosphere also results in stronger storms, which causes enhanced coastal erosion and worsened flooding. The rate of sea level rise is increasing as well, in part because it's a positive feedback loop (warming oceans -> ice melt -> less energy reflected back into space -> more ice melt), and in part because human CO2 emissions have never been higher (all of our efforts thus far have only slowed the rate of increase; emissions are still growing steadily higher). All of these factors have combined to hammer coastal communities, as predicted. I don't know who was claiming Florida would literally be underwater by now, but that was never a realistic expectation. However, if all land-based ice were to melt, global sea levels would rise on the order of 100 meters (see 1:48:58), and global warming is much more intense in polar regions (see again, 1:48:34; look at the anomalies around the poles that have built up in recent years).
Just saving this comment to read later
Excellent summation. Thank you.
Unfortunately everything eventually gets politicised and funding is the only reliable barometer
The so-called consensus among scientists is nonsense - it is a consensus of mostly people who don't understand properly and are along for the activist ride, plus people like Gore who simply wanted to make a fortune out of fleecing people with scary messages. The activist voice is very prominent and this threatens academic funding for those who speak up in favour of objectivity, so some voices are silenced and people forced to tow the activist line to keep their funding. As for rising sea levels, check out the Maldives and also ask why so many wealthy people choose to live right at the water's edge. Do they know something the activists don't? By the by, when ice caps melt, the land beneath often springs up as the weight comes off and sea ice melting has zero sea level effect. The Antarctic maximum seasonal sea ice extent has been at record levels in recent years, according to NASA satellite monitoring (since 1971).
Wow, what a comprehensive review of all relevant cycles influencing our climate. Excellent work
These phenomenally excellent productions are costly - understood. The constant ads are annoying and many of us are financially struggling and can't afford to pay for TH-cam Premium or Patreon. So, I grin and bare the reality of watching those few seconds of meaningless ads for the pleasure of enjoying and learning from productions uploaded to this fair and free platform we all know and love - TH-cam 😅
If I was teaching a class in horticulture or agriculture, I would certainly have this documentary as part of my teaching matriculations.
So in 10 or so years a spring tide with an onshore storm surge will deffo break records in loads of places .
this channel "Sleepy Atom" has taken the transcript from at least one of your videos and present it as one of their own. the AI voice even uses your name and the Astrum channel name. listen at 1:03 in the video they uploaded 3 days ago (the most recent video.)
Glad to know that i need to wait only 26,000 years to enjoy autumn
i am able and willing to last 26,000 years and 1 day for that sweet, sweet, autumn rain on fallen leaf smell... ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 💯💕🌼🌸🦝🤗☺☺☺☺👍👌💯😊👁👅👁
Thanks for such a fascinating look at the climate and how it changes. You’ve done more to convince me global warming is a fact and we humans have made a contribution to it, than any other source. I love your videos, your level of knowledge is amazing and your teaching ability makes me wish you’d been my physics teacher at school!
For all the people whose complaining about the ads, cuz these days youtube gone way outta the way...Why dont we all sue TH-cam for not paying us, because they are generating income thus we watch, so they are supposed to pay us, not asking us to pay money if we want to watch every content without ads. We are the people that made youtube became the most watched platform on the internet. Lets do this thing...
Brilliant video. This needs to be shared with EVERYBODY.
it would be nice to talk a bit also about pollution and not just about CO2...great video anyway thanks!
It would be nice if he talk much about the massive deforestation of our designated rainforest for timbers and land clearance to accommodate industrial grazing ranches. And what is the impact of this action and the chain of reaction of tempering with massive ecosystem? Could our life survive the imbalances of ecosystem. Amazon is now cleared to create ranches and boost Brazil economy. I hope the new government is now regulating and recovered the lands grabbed and illegal acquired by the former president elites.
How about the last two years of solar x-flares (some of the biggest on record) and the increased volcanic activities?
Lolz that is the funny thing about this guy
Zero info or data or explanation of why we have such insane rapid warming. He just kind of glosses over that and says that this is some more advanced thing and right in the beginning he basically tells everyone watching that you're a moron and you should delete whatever you know so that his subsequent 1.9 hours of time completely installs into your brain and replaces whatever you thought before.
@@mansoormannix1753
Yes indeed deforestation, however not so sure if our species' impact on Earth's land has been any more devastating than the oceans, or our atmosphere? if you consider the size of things.
@mansoormannix1753 Your forgetting the Amazon rain forest is being stripped away for balsa wood used in the blades wind turbines. Not so green is it.
YES!!! Finally someone not speaking propaganda that can admit we don't actually know much when it comes to weather. Because taxing fossil fuels has nothing to do with improving the environment, only artificially driving up it's cost.
Externalities is an economic term for passing the cost of one consumers use of something to others. Using fossil fuels without tax is passing cost to others who are impacted without getting the benefits. Economics doesn't work if you don't have to pay the true costs of use of something, like in communism, the incentive to produce and not consume is absent, and everything breaks down.
Agreed. It just drives up the cost of everyday items, and we all know inflation hits the poor the hardest.
What do they do with that tax revenue anyway? If they are taxing it to specifically counter the perceived climate change related to fossil fuels, then why do they also have to pass big spending bills using more tax dollars for climate change? The budget should already exist within the tax revenue received on fossil fuels.
Fossil fuels will run out one day. What will we do then, if we have not invested in green/renewable tech?
@@ShiniJenkins unfortunately, the atmosphere will run out before the fossil fuels. Methyl hydrates on the ocean floor are orders of magnitude more than our current supply.
@@ShiniJenkins There is no such thing as "fossil fuels", organic compounds simply dont last that long. But as long as things keep dyeing and settling to the bottom of oceans, streams, lakes, and pretty much everywhere living things live like plankton, there should be no shortage. Its when the oil companies create artificial shortages to drive up prices that problems arise. Because if we ever reach peak oil production, it will be done intentionally. We are actually in greater risk of running out of fresh, clean; water.
So what about the Coriolis effect? Is my dog going to start spinning the other direction?
Fun and all but no matter what we do no matter what we discover the weather is controlled by the Angel Mikael by order of The Creator… The Universe is being expanded daily by The Creator himself…
Our impact is huge aswell but it is not a mystery like in the video but it nice to watch
Love the sound of the voice narrating & so happy to have stumbled on this video - I will watch it many many times I am sure to remember the concepts / language of the scienc I love it / fantastic cozy reprieve from all the current news I’ve been watching thank you thank you thank you
Love it❤🌎🌌🎩
The world seems to constantly get deeper the closer you look. Even in the most simple areas of life. So I beleive if I dont pursue being an expert in it I should just give "my" current stance to the most nuanced and detailed explaination Ive heard. They have shown the most evidence for the deepest knowledge on the topic.
Thank you for making this. Im sure, as with everything, even more nuance exists... there always is... even in the most simple seeming areas of life.
Well yeah, we live in a universe that's almost infinite, and each one of us has our own small universe inside our skulls....
Nothing is simple
What an incredible and comprehensive video to explain how our climate works and how we are affecting it. Thank you for this gift. This is a real gem. BRAVO!
I’m just at minute 15 and I must admit that this is the most interesting video I’ve ever seen 😮🎉❤😊
The is figging excellent. Thank you Alex. I have learned so much about each of these cycles and how they interplay. Some stuff I knew, some I thought I knew. But this has been truly educational.
Ah!, you got the CC banner under your video. Wear it like a badge of honor.
Talking about CC at all puts that on your video
all videos about climate change get it
VO: "Consider this small norwegian town of Tromsø..."
Arrow: points at northern Finland, not the norwegian coast
🤭
He also says altitude instead of latitude.
Fascinating how you can relate the Milankovitch cycle with the 4 yugas.
According to spiritual savant Sri Yukeswars book The Holy Science narrates how the Yugas act as our spiritual evolutionary steering mechanism.We are currently on an ascending spiritual evolutionary trajectory for the next 10k years.
I prefer to look upon the yugas as an ascension into the higher chakras.
The shift into a higher dimensional reality is just a lame idea that some spiritual teacher hope will sell their books.
@@tr7b410 There are effects of planetary alignments on chakras. Not talking about individuals but all living beings. Ultimately we are the universe.
@saurabhsurve9247 See book by spiritual savant Sri Yukeswar:The Holy Science narrates how the Yugas act as our spiritual evolutionary steering mechanism.We are currently on an ascending spiritual evolutionary trajectory for the next 10k years.
To validate this claim see the massive amounts of information being downloaded into the conscious minds of NDE experiencers. See NDE of Jose Hernandez-ATHEIST DIES AND IS SHOCKED BY WHO HE SEES IN HEAVEN 3 million views.
Additionally our next generation are gaining access to the past life memories stored in their subconscious minds.
See series-The Ghost Inside my Child.Actual testimonials from children in the west remembering their past lives and beyond. GODSPEED
Did you take into account the declining magnetosphere and the rise in radiation and particles hitting the earth? We may be experiencing an event that has never been seen by homo sapiens before. we have a magnetic north pole that is drifting 55 km per year and the south Atlantic anomaly that is growing in size while the magnetic field is decreasing in strength. How many more of the dynamos are slowing down to reverse. We know it happens but don't have all the evidence to how it happens. This is not accounted for in the Milankovitch cycles. Funny the previous occurrence of this event happens to coincide with the bottleneck in the genus homo 900k years ago.
Thank you for a brilliant explanation with abundant resource done about the world and its cycles and whims! Very informing! I just love this video.
I’m super happy Astrum put out this 1hr almost 2 video thanks for that I am like many others intrigued by your content as I find it to be informative and calming I learn a lot about space from you and other channels kinda similar like Fraser Kane, PBS Space Time and others for more education thanks again bro!!!
There is growing momentum to remove temperature readings from large cities to reduce the impact of the so-called heat island effect. Once those data are removed the overall increase in global temperature is drastically reduced. The increased temperature caused by the heat retained in concrete surfaces and buildings is anthropogenic, but not as a result of the increased CO2 in the atmosphere.
Humans have been aware of "concrete makes things hot" since the Romans invented it.
Scientists use more than one data point before coming to a conclusion and if you had an actual scientific source you'd see that they take the heat island effect into account by taking readings from around the world.
The urban heat island effect is always accounted for. We also see the same warming trend in rural areas, over the ocean hundreds of miles from any form of civilization, and IN the ocean 700 meters down. The Arctic is warming three times faster than the rest of the world. There is no urban heat island effect there. Be aware that this internet mythology is peddled by Anthony Watts of Wattsupwiththat and has no scientific support from credible scientific institutions or studies.
Very nice video! Educational and your videos are always visually beautiful. Thank you? Plus your voice is so pleasing to listen to.
This is the best documentary on the Earths cycles, climate change and human interferrence I have ever seen. Thank you!!!
Great video! I was a little nervous about this one since one of the things I enjoy most about your videos is the absence of political banter that has been seeping into everything, but I was not disappointed.
One thing that needs to be said about man-made co2 emissions is that any discussion that doesn't include China in particular, and India is a waste of time since they produce the vast majority of co2 emissions and practice other environmentally destructive methods such as the ones used for producing batteries for electric cars. There's not much else that can be done in Western nations that would have any meaningful effect on man-made climate change, but that point is sadly left out of politically charged discussions on the topic for some reason.
Second time around. And loving it still. Conclusion if you study weather you can talk about it . If not no not allowed. Therefore we know we're corrupt, politicians are given more airtime!
get another prospective
Awesome video... I don't know if people will be able to get though all of it. But in summary, the scientific consensus is quite clear... 01:35:00 It's a shame that the subject is being weaponized in political discourse, (although not surprising, considering the power and influence of the fossil fuel industry has on politics). I wished more people believed in science, and not people of power/influence. There's so much noise and misinformation out there. I think this video did a great job in representing every key aspect we know of today, and this video should be able to shield most against all the misinformation campaigns out there...
Don't believe science. Science was never meant to be believed. Verify it and study it.
Saying the "scientific consensus (is clear/settled)" is a politically charged phrase, same with "believing" in science. The "consensus" over Covid was "quite clear" when governments were forcing experimental medicine(s) on people so their donor class could rake in record profits over public health. Then suddenly the "consensus" was a lot less clear when injuries and lawsuits started to climb.
Do you know what the medical "consensus" did to the guy who discovered hand washing before surgery stopped disease transmission? They discredited his findings, ruined his career and he eventually died a broken man in an insane asylum. _THAT_ is what "the consensus" does to it's own. It excises challenging thoughts and falls into an echo chamber.
Nobody needs to "believe" in science because the scientific method itself _invites_ challenge. Every theory proposed should _want_ to be disproven. That's the heart of the scientific method. When someone says they "believe in the science" what they really mean is they believe in "scientism", which is a religion.
The fact that a "consensus" of scientists use climate change like a cudgel against their critics, some of whom are themselves scientists in the same fields of study and have valid counter arguments (the "consensus" did the _exact_ same thing over alternative covid treatments proposed by many doctors, including the guy who invented mRNA vaccination that the shot itself uses), and attack and slander anyone who offers up challenges-- again, antithetical to scientific method, only proves that many fields of science have been captured and corrupted-- including the discussion on climate change, and often because of external, activist/political influences.
We won't come to the answers until money and politics remove themselves from all disciplines of science. At this stage we cannot tell a truth from a lie. Think about it.
You can't tell when their lying? Yipes! If question something then research it.
History, which most learned in school, shows us the Earth changes...climate.changes...I remember years ago when I found out were are still in a ice age, I was like ya no. Then I researched.
Also our atmosphere is the cleanest its been in decades, nothing to do with obama, Trump or biden.
Cow farts, farming, gardening also does not cause climate change.
You can't tell when their lying? Then research it.
Please do not tell me you actually believed that cow farts, farming, gardening causes climate change?
Never a truer word spoken. PHD,s for sale to the highest bidder.
Amazing video! Had to watch it in parts because it is so long, but did'nt want to miss anything. Thank you for researching all the facts for us and let us know cleary what is assumption and opinion, and what is not. Favorite part was 'Context is important'!
Nicely presented Alex. Its like a toned-down version of what Suspicious 0bservers channel has delivered over the last 10years. Somewhere in the middle is the more likely outcome.
Thanks for not being Neil degrasse Tyson
Why do you say that friend?
@@wailingalen he’s a sellout my friend
@@wailingalenhe's a microcephalic
Lol Amen
@@wailingalenhe doesn't understand the difference between boys and girls - not trustworthy at all
This video should be shown in school classrooms to students not just in the United States but all over the world. We need more of this type of content to educate the doubters in this world of what is happening to our planet naturally and unnaturally.
Scientists aren't saying this is the hottest the world has ever been. They are saying the earth is the hottest it's been since WE, HUMAN BEINGS, have been around.
👍
Magnificent - you presented all my favorite subjects in one video. Thank you! As to mass extinctions and geomagnetic pole shifts, some claim we are in one mass extinction right now - with loss of species of birds, insects and plants. Earth is an electromagnetic system, we seem to understand the part about magnetism really well - while we do not understand the electric part as well.
But burning Styrofoam is just so much FUN!!
@user-gc6wd7dm4w you know what else is a problem?
2x+3y=49
@@termy3934the answer is 12
Indeed. You have a great point.
@@termy3934figuring out one's gender?
@@thereignofthezero225
LoL
El Ninō in Belgium/ the Netherlands = twice mayby trippel amount of Rain and cloudy days....😢
It's raining almost daily since september 2023 till now were are over the anual average ...in only half a year.
I mis those Hot El ninā summers already😂😂
Grtz johny geerts
The graph at 1:35 is wrong. It fails to show the Roman and Medieval warm periods, which were warmer than today. It also fails to show the Little Ice Age, which is considered the coldest period in the last 5000 years. It was warmer during the 1930s than today. That's the time of the Dust Bowl when many people moved to California. This is not a theory but a documented fact.Yet your graph doesn't show it. Why? Where did you get that graph? Are you aware that the IPCC scientists manipulated (massaged) temperatures over these time periods. Also NASA and NOAA have been caught manipulating temperatures. They admit this. But there is no excuse for changing data that you don't like just because of an agenda you are promoting.
Yep, I noticed that too. Trust the science™ - sponsored by Pfizer
Those phenomena were regional. Consolidated and correlated global proxy data shows that the “RWP,” the “MWP,” and the “Little Ice Age,” were localized to Europe and the North Atlantic.
The global averages shown reflect our currently accepted consensus.
Local anomalies are not necessarily reflective of global conditions. The consensus model of rapid climate change is based on global averages.
We’ve observed 60 years of data and more from datapoints as disparate as Antarctica and Bangladesh.
The data doesn’t lie. Literally millions of science workers aren’t conspiring to live lonely, nerdy lives traveling to brutally remote locations to collect that data.
Almost no one gets wealthy off the academia of climate science.
Consider this: almost all climate scientists are trained in geology. Oil companies offer EXTREMELY lucrative contracts to geologists to find hydrocarbon reserves.
Why tf would anyone choose climatology versus getting fabulously wealthy working for an oil company?
The world all time temperature record occurred in 1934 in Death Valley, CA at 134 degrees F. Libya's 136 degree reading was recently disqualified due to suspicious local reports. In 1936, Kansas recorded its record high of 122 F. But the worldwide average annual temperature has crept upward from 56 degrees F when records began in the 19th century to about 58 degrees as of 2023(?) the most recent year with completed data.
Nope,dude it wasn't warmer than today. Someone lied to you and you believed it
There's no exact data for these periods, though ice core samples would suggest they were not GLOBALLY as warm as you make out.
That was a fantastic video. Really informative but also terrifying.. great work Timothy, and your sponsor who made it possible. I think the longer format Really works well.. However I understand how much work you put into each one you create. 👍
Our minds represent the world we feel by our neurons, via energy. Energy is love, gravity is love, we are love, and all is love. There would not exist anything without love, and love without anything
Driving on a Memorial Day road trip. Perfect video for the drive. This is an important, unbiased discussion that I cannot thank you enough for. You have guts to go against the narrative! Good job
He went along with man made CO2 causing global warming which is totally untrue & is just one gigantic hoax.
I hoped for the same and ended up being really disappointed by the end of a 2 hrs long video. He repeated 100% mainstream narrative. Which I would be fine with, but what was cunning was the clickbaity title pulling in people to watch 2 hrs of exactly 0 controversy.
I've see lots of info about how in the 70s the climate change people were warning about an ice age.
My theory is that they created things that would purposely warm the planet and it worked a little too well and now we're dealing with those consequences.
I'm sure if we had enough mirrored surfaces deployed strategicly across our lands, we could reflect enough sunlight to reverse the climate mess that these people possibly created.
But that would be too simple.
@@old_gaffer The "mainstream narrative" is based on the scientific data described in the video. These facts have been known to scientists for decades before it became mainstream knowledge.
@@ermpson5799 and no one here is arguing that. I pointed out the fact that the original title of the video was "my most controversial video on YT...." and there was no controversy whatsoever in it. so don't get triggered for no reason.
I hate the clickbaity title "This will be the most controvercial video on youtube" It immediatly made me want to ignore the video! What was wrong with "A Shift in the Earth's Cycles Is Coming" Simple and interesting! In spite of this I will listen to it!
Did he change the title to what you suggested
Troll
Astrum rocks, anything this guy and team does is brilliant !
@@duanefentiman They are really good and I want them to be better. If you share this clip, then I find the shared title clickbaity.. That made me not want to click it. For someone who has never seen or heard an astrum video before that can make or break my interest. The only thing that made me click it was my trust in the one sharing it.
Most comprehensive information ever!!! Thank as always your unbiased information!🙏
Alex, i thank you for your explanation of all of this. I studied geology and paleoecology and climatogy. I knew all about Milankovitch cycles and orbit eccentricity, even that the sun is slowly getting hotter, but i must have missed all the parts about axial wobble. Thanks for explaining it with such great visuals to help. Another great presentation!
Great video ❤
Thank you so much for a long video 😭🙏🏻
"Hmmm, cracking video, Gromi-it!" :)
Very nice to watch these videos and not get lectured about global warming for an hour. Enjoyed this a lot.
Wow, just amazing. Thank you from New Zealand!
Excellent presentation, thank you..
Shoutout to Milutin Milankovic! Go Serbia.
19:45 "Could occur in late 2023"?
I'm guessing a lot of this is a supercut with some new bits too.
Maybe im wrong but think he was pointing out the prediction coming true. The claim was made in 2022.
Gives off the feeling that AI was used for this video.
The best and most important video I've watched in a long time. Τhis should be shown in all the schools throughout the world.