ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ค. 2024
- We know diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) boosts creativity and profits, but progress has been slow: today, nearly 90 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs are white males. It's time for leaders to become "rock stars" of inclusion -- and that starts with pushing through discomfort to forge new connections, says veteran broadcaster and diversity leader June Sarpong. She presents examples of successful, creative DEI efforts and calls for leaders at the top to make the first move. "When it comes to diversity and inclusion, we need bold disruptors who are uncomfortable with the status quo, even if the status quo benefits them," Sarpong says.
If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: ted.com/membership
Follow TED!
Twitter: / tedtalks
Instagram: / ted
Facebook: / ted
LinkedIn: / ted-conferences
TikTok: / tedtoks
The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world's leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design - plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
Watch more: go.ted.com/junesarpong
• We Need Leaders Who Bo...
TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (or the CC BY - NC - ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: www.ted.com/about/our-organiz.... For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests.ted.com
#TED #TEDTalks #inclusion
![ภาพนี้ก็ฮาเหมือนกันนะเนี้ย #2 SS8 [ พากย์นรก MEME.EXE ] | easy boy](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RMhUgxxD49Q/mqdefault.jpg)
No, we need leaders who will boldly tell people to screw off for caring about things other than competence and moral virtue.
"The gut feeling is such a power. Full for each, other doubtful lies, below the compass´s upper rotation in mind, us more potently, see not dizzy, missy or gent. The time is a sure an event." (KenLit)
Competence > Everything
Competence should determine where people end up. We should try to fight exclusion thats unfairly biased. There.
well put. Inclusion should not be a priority, but at the same, intentional exclusion should be battled
But exclusion is built into the fabric of society, it is historic and ever growing. All stats point to the widening of wealth gap , the decline in education for the poorest, decline in health care adjusted from advancement in health care for the poor. The widening gap of housing. It's hard to address these exclusion barriers without an overhaul of society. Inclusion is not perfect but contrary to people's fear nepotism introduces more incompetence than inclusion has ever done and ever do. This hypothetical ills of inclusion is soo overblown.
@@SpadeFungi 😂
@@lilaudiolympianYt funny? :(
How about a meritocracy?
Where your identity doesn't matter at all, just your, you know, merit.
A colleague worked at a place that championed inclusion and they said it was terrible. It was a very political environment where certain groups of people were afraid to voice opinions and other groups of people took advantage of that and became bullies. Productivity was nonexistent as people toiled in the politics. "It's a paradox" they'd say "it seemed that inclusion leads more to exclusion".
Yes, the paradox of tolerance requires being intolerant to the intolerant. It might be a better place to work at now that your colleague is gone.
@@biologicalengineoflove6851 ~ it is doubtful that the place has improved. The place was bad when they joined and remained bad throughout their time there.
@@dsmyify Why was it bad? Which groups of people were afraid to voice opinions, and what were those opinions? Your post is very vague.
I hope NBA management watching this. Stop obsessing over winning and be more inclusive. Older, women etc deserve place in NBA
ROFLMAO...good one!
every company that try the "inclusion" ends bad
the inclusion create privileged groups, and the privileged rarely work hard
I went to look at comments to read idiotic nodding yes people ... but I was so wrong.
It was such a long time when people were told what to do, what to think and how to react and feel.
Maybe the new era has began...we don't need influencers, we need champions
We need people who voice our opinion not trying to shape it
And when some visionary comes to us with new ideas, they should be in a form of proposal and an open discussion rather than pushed onto us discarding our opinions completely.
How about "We Need Leaders Who Boldly Champion Competence".
Always choose the best people for the job. No quotas. That is the only way to have a truly meritocratic society, not one of privilege based on who you are born as.
World economic forum's Klaus Schwab would be proud of you.
😂
We need leaders that boldly champion excellence regardless of color, not because of diversity and inclusion.
So basically we should choose our leaders based on skin color to make sure that its inclusive enough? Isn't it rasist? I would stick to competence, skills and shear work as a only factor of choice :P
Conversations like this show how little attention is paid to what poc talk about. The term not all skin folk is kin folk is one as such. POC don't want black / brown faces in spaces just because. Real inclusion is more nuanced than that and the knee jerk reaction is frankly insulting. Also it is not racist and there is not enough time to explain why it's not
@@SpadeFungi Obviously skin toned it's just simplification, what I meant was promoting people thanks to their inclusive value instead of abilities. Please explain me what you mean and why employing people based on their inclusivity traits (religion, skin tone, ethnicity, nationality) is not racist. Otherwise I will think that you simply don't have any argument.
@@ThePawcios But that is not the case for inclusivity you are not employing someone based on the traits you mentioned. Inclusivity is everything from is there work from home options so people who are qualified and let's say have mobility issues can access work spaces in the figurative sense and have a seat at the table. Are historic barriers considered and how can that be reduced. I can list so many ways inclusivity is not merely plonking person a with trait b into a space they have no competency. By now it's not a secret on the barriers people in marginalised groups have faced historical which impacts the today. The cake I ate last week will affect the size of my hips today (I say in jest). Inclusivity shouldn't feel like a dirty word, as I keep saying people have all these notions about the harm of inclusivity but don't spend this time looking at the harm nepotism causes. Connected people creating opportunities for other connected people and leaving most of society out (regardless of competency)
@@SpadeFungi Well, I can agree on what you wrote, however this video presents clearly different inclusivity... one which I mentioned :P She is complaining about white male leaders... how do you explain that? It's not anymore about removing barriers but equity and equal outcome.
@@ThePawcios Do I think some people who talk about inclusivity don't always do a good job of it? Yes. However let's not pretend we don't know how and why power is concentrated in one particular group of people. And adjusted for wealth white and male are still the most powerful within all social classes.
If you are in a country that is fighting against the successful, ambitious and even human, what am I doing?
For a second i thought this is TEDx. Still believe it belongs there
What you call inclusion is not really inclusion when you exclude One race totally the white race there's only one race the human race and when you try to manipulate the number of races in each field you take away from the ones that are good in that field who are eligible race should never be a factor race is not the most important thing character is you are not defined by your race your fuse are very regressive and transgressive America is already diverse The Outsiders come and make you think that it's not it's all about grabbing a power
NO! We need realistic people that recognize TALENT and SKILL, instead of hair color or “beliefs”!!!
It is called inclusion as too many people poitned out diversity is from the same base as divide. We are supposed to work together not squable over scraps.
Depending on the work environment, diversity and inclusion can be great and beneficial for a company. However, employee competence and ability must trump all else. You must be able to get a diverse work place without forced diversity hiring for inclusion to actually work.
"Corporate leader's" more like corporate master's basically new aristocracy
What about rewarding performance instead of focusing on personal characteristics?
Notice that they use words like inclusive instead of champion for the truth
What is it called when institutions discriminate against people on the basis of race? Whatever that's called, that's what I'm opposed to.
great talk!
The I feel narrative always gets tossed in a public sense tho it’s gotta make sense in money.
Great Gandhian values that the world is learning now
Nice video
We SHOULD boldly elect bold leaders to CHAMPION the inclusion of people not included so long as they are selected according to their ability. We must (as an example) ensure all medical Doctors are Qualified to practice medicine. Thus ensuring common sense predominates and we live in a pragmatic World. We must ban all Witch Doctors before we include them.
Inspiring woman for time 🕰️
She is a natural.
You want inclusion, read the comments. 😅
It's funny how they don't want your feedback unless the prompted it. I quit watching woke TED talks, but come to see the comments. Changed the game on them.
This is wokeness dripping with honey.
Well…maybe you should go back to sleep.
She's very confused, her core values seem to be materialism and social status.
She confuses business men with innovators and she doesn't know anything about soccer.
Her thinking is extremely local and she doesn't even understand that location.
Her values are the problem, the root cause for all the problems in the US.
This is peak white, booshwa "feminism"
Just hone your skills/expertise to the highest level possible and then eventually you'll see INCLUSION in the upper tax brackets.hahah Getting a position based solely on non-merit criteria does nothing for the team and does nothing for the individual. Wokely inflammatory BS.
11:11
No, we don't need DEI. We just don't.
I think y’all didn’t watch/misinterpreted the Ted talk. The truth is there’s tons of competent people from minorities who don’t get a chance to be part of something because someone else who’s a difference race or gender with the equal or even less qualifications is often favoured. This is just looking to make the playing field equal, it’s not saying we should hire random people to jobs they aren’t suited for. People will really take any message and try to make it something it’s not lol
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽…..
She speaks so eloquently. I like her composure.
inclusion is nefaste to progress.
I wonder who this person voted for president
First, we need leaders...
Cogent speech, great voice modulation. Yes we need Leaders who can guide not administrators who dictates as per their whims and fancy.
Yawn 🥱
🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭
*reads title*
No.
*watches video*
You not only cemented my beliefs, you've now made me explicitly exclusionary wherever legal to do so.
"I know what You are thinkin´!" :D
Judging by the comments some people have missed the f_ing point! June most likely didn't mention 'competence' because she knew that's exactly where small-minded people would jump to first.
If you have never confidence-shattering exclusion due to a host of reasons but specifically the colour of your skin and MOST IMPORTANTLY if you lack basic compassion, you will have missed the point of this talk. Bravo to you!
Maybe step aside and let people who have empathy do the work that needs doing.
Well she did a fantastic job with this. I was expecting to watch 30 seconds before I got bored, but she had a very compelling, coherent, and charismatic presentation of an important message. Well done..
I see this as racism. To "tell, sway, push, nudge, or subtlety suggest" to wealthy, or influential people, of any one specific race, to purposely "give" to another race based on the race of the two....I view as racism.
Likewise for gender.
To nudge to sway a human based on merit, however...we all know that this is just proper. We all also know that this, sadly, isn't nearly common enough. Currently the facts seem to be, that people promote whom they like the most, of the people nearest to themselves. Typically their own family members 1st, then friends, then bussiness. Not always because of merit, but because no matter a man's race, if his son, wife, or best friend is stronger, he too is.
To be angry at people for doing this, was something I did in my youth. I think we all do. To accept this, and understand that the only person that claims me to be valuable is my God, and the few people that I gain skills that benefit them...has brought me some peace. To think that I should tell my Chinese, Japanese, Indian, African, English, American, German boss that they should hire/promote me because I'm "this race", and it worked out for this guy that did it....not only calls the "guy who did it" a racist (because probably he didn't. It's much more likely that he worked hard at pursuing talent, hired said talented individuals, and won for it.)
But it would immediately paint me myself to be a racist.
Why....because my focus is on race.
Mine.
Theirs.
Colors.
Race.
Racism.
Hence, I feel as if this video were racewar-bait.
Not only for this, but also because "the western world" is referenced. And so sadly, there is an epidemic of material recently, very similar to this, in the news, and politics in the US. And it is the US government putting it out to the people, in an attempt to divide the American people.
It is not ok to hate, based solely on race, or nationality.
It is natural to promote that which promotes one's self....tho it isn't always the most gracious choice every single time.
I hope this makes sense.
Godspeed to all nations, creeds, colors, and kind 🙏
How tf you come from another country trying to tell America about America
Well said! 👍🏾💐 Thank you 🙏🏽 💓
We absolutely do NOT need any more leaders practicing inclusion....WE NEED TO BE SEPARATIST AND PROTECT OUR OWN. I SPEAK FOR BLACK PEOPLE. WE DO NOT WANT YOU USURPING OUR RESOURCES AND OWNERSHIP AND ENERGY AGAIN....BLACK PEOPLE HAVE NO ALLIES