MONTEC vs M3: Which is Better? G5 BROADHEAD BATTLE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
  • This is a Broadhead Battle between 2 very popular heads by G5 Outdoors: the MONTEC & the M3.
    I'm using a Bowtech SR6 at 72# & 27" draw length and Bishop FOC King Arrows, 460 grs.
    I have also picked up a new sponsor with my top recommendation for Broadhead Sharpening. staysharpguide... or @Innovative Outdoorsman The support I get for that has helped me improve my channel. They make excellent sharpeners, including their new "Stay Sharp Guide 344" designed for 3 blade single piece heads like these.
    Check it out here: • 344 sharpener by Stay ...
    In case you're not familiar with my new test protocol, here is what I'm doing now:
    1. Flight Test--1 field point & 2 broadheads out my by Bowtech SR6 at 40 yds, to see how well they group together.
    2. Sharpness Test: I have a new test for edge sharpness and edge retention, using the Edge on Up Sharpness Tester. I test it out of the box and then again after Penetration Test 1, to see the edge retention.
    What are some common scores for other edges? Here are some examples:
    A butter knife takes 2000 grams of pressure to break the co polymer wire.
    A new high end cutlery edge takes approx 375 grams of pressure to break the wire.
    A utility razor blade takes approx 200 grams to break the wire.
    Based on the many broadheads I have tested, here is my scoring scale:
    Out of the Box Sharpness:
    0-200 gr: 10
    201-300 gr 9
    301-400 gr: 8
    401-500 gr: 7
    501-600 gr: 6
    601-700 gr: 5
    701-800 gr: 4
    801-900 gr: 3
    901-1000 gr: 2
    1001-1100 gr: 1
    1101+ gr: 0
    3. Edge Retention: Sharpness difference after Penetration Test 1:
    10 minus 1 point for every 50 grams of sharpness difference. For example, if the initial sharpness was 400 gr of pressure and the sharpness after Penetration Test 1 was 450, the head would receive a 9 for Edge Retention Score.
    4. Penetration Test 1: one shot into a combined medium of 2/3" of rubber mat, 1/2" MDF and Clear Ballistics FBI Grade Gel. This is to roughly simulate the tissue of an animal--hide, bone and muscle/fat.
    5. Penetration Test 2: one shot into layers of cardboard.
    6. Durability Test: For fixed blade heads, I take up to 5 shots into .22 ga steel plate and then evaluate the damage to the head. This is a good test to see the overall durability of the blades, as well as their connection to the ferrule. For mechanical heads, I take up to 5 shots into 1/2" MDF and then evaluate the damage to the head.
    7. Concrete Test. This is a zero penetration test, which is a good test of the overall structural integrity of a head.
    NOTE: Of course I understand we don't hunt steel plates and concrete, but all of these tests simply provide DATA POINTS for you to use in determining which broadhead is best for your hunting purposes. A well placed shot with pretty much any broadhead will get the job done most of the time. But why not prepare for the worst and buy the best you can?
    If one head can hold up to multiple shots in steel & concrete-and another cannot--all other things equal, wouldn't you want to use the head that can withstand the steel and concrete? And after taking hundreds of animals with my bow, I've seen some bone shots cause more damage to a broadhead than even a cinder block.
    The goal for all of us is to stack the odds in our favor as much as possible, and select a broadhead that is as lethal as possible for our bow/arrow set up and for the animal we are hunting.
    At the end of each of my broadhead tests, you will find a score sheet listing all the results of the testing, so you can compare heads based on what factors matter to you the most. I also have an overall LUSK GRADE that is an evaluation of how the head performed in all the tests combined.
    #G5
    #Broadhead
    #StaySharpGuide
    Here are my Personal Discount Codes for other Broadheads that I'd like to share with you:
    SEVR: LUSKFIVE
    Tooth of the Arrow: LUSK19
    Afflictor: LUSK10
    Any financial support I get from my sponsor or from the discount codes is invested into my channel.

ความคิดเห็น • 200

  • @cg_justin_5327
    @cg_justin_5327 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I haven't tried the M3, but I have taken deer with the Montec. Here's what I do. I use Montecs early season, when leaves are thick. The penetration is just unmatched. They will pass through like they didn't even slow down. About mid November I switch to Swhakers. If I had to pick one....I'm going Montec. It does what it says on package. And if you buy the sharpening G5 sharpening tool, reusabilty is top notch. G5 does NOT make a bad product.

  • @jaredmcnutt731
    @jaredmcnutt731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This was a great idea for comparison between two pretty common and affordable heads.

  • @african7498
    @african7498 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for the test. Reassuring to see how well the G5 performed

  • @MikeyWoomer
    @MikeyWoomer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That was about as close to a tie that your gonna see . Good job John! Thanks for the video

  • @EastonBraden
    @EastonBraden 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've shot the Montecs, and probably the best flying fixed broadhead I have shot. Looking into getting the M3s. Thanks for the video! Great!

  • @mountainview540
    @mountainview540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I appreciate this series of videos I'm having to choose a new broadhead for this hunting season

  • @Ryanralston07
    @Ryanralston07 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As someone who used the Montec for a few years, I found the Montec made more noise going through the air because of its open design. They were accurate, but I believe the noise they made flying through the air did affect how animals such as deer reacted to the shot at longer distances of 35+ yards.

  • @timberg7377
    @timberg7377 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nicely done, I really love your tests

  • @feralgrandad4429
    @feralgrandad4429 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Montec is still my go to head in areas I hunt that regulate a 3 blade heads. But was I stuck in the woods with either I would cry about it. Top job as usual John.

  • @ronlongwellphoto
    @ronlongwellphoto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, John. Thanks! I too was expecting more from the M3.

  • @nsns3743
    @nsns3743 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    These comparisons are great.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. With the score sheets of each head, you can always compare one head to another. But when the specs are almost identical, I like doing these Battles.

  • @finnethrows8635
    @finnethrows8635 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for the awesome test! Definitely expected the M3 to win but it's awesome to see the original hold it's own.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Finne. Yeah, I did as well. It has its advantages in some areas, but so did the Montec.

  • @Hambone8771
    @Hambone8771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They definitely look like they performed very well. I would use both of those no prob! Cool video👍🏾

  • @jolookstothestars6358
    @jolookstothestars6358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've been watching you for years now and love the videos!! I have a theory about quite broadheads. I used to shoot the blackhornet, great broadhead but noise. I could hear it all the way to the target but sence switching to the Kudu my arrow is dead quite. I'd love to see some take on that challenge. Yes game can react to our bow noise but the longer the shot i think the more they react to the noise of the arrow. Thanks for all the cool content, I'm also a broadhead nut. ; )

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, I've read a lot about that and tested it quite a bit myself. I've just never seen an animal react to arrow noise--and that includes up to a 100 yd shot on an elk and multiple 50+ yd shots on whitetail. A moving noise could be a bird flying by or a bug zipping by. But a static , pinpointed bow shot noise is completely different. Arrow flight could be an issue, but I've just never seen it.

    • @ryanhaberman1727
      @ryanhaberman1727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can you do a video on the best long range broadhead?

  • @garedjennings6509
    @garedjennings6509 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Lusk, one thing I've often wondered is the difference in penetration between a broadhead right out of the package versus a broadhead that has been sharpened with the Stay Sharp Broadhead system. Could be a cool video just saying. Love your videos!

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's a great question. I am going to address that in an upcoming vid called Broadheads & Bloodtrails. In short, sharpness does not affect penetration nearly as much as people think. But it does affect how effectively it cuts tissue, veins, and arteries. So all other things equal, a sharper head will draw more blood than the less sharper head.

    • @garedjennings6509
      @garedjennings6509 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures Yes this makes a lot of sense. You want those veins and arteries to slice cleanly. I've been getting my sevr broadheads to shave hair with the stay sharp broadheads system. Can't wait to see what they do.

  • @ThatJamesGuy88
    @ThatJamesGuy88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simmons Sporting Goods in Bastrop Louisiana is a fantastic store! I want to go there more often, can’t recommend them enough.

    • @finnethrows8635
      @finnethrows8635 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Appreciate it boss!

    • @briannash9122
      @briannash9122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We were there for the Simmon's Tent Sale, and Riley was trying to sell me these broadheads, and I mentioned I was waiting for the Lusk Review. If you get a chance to go by Simmon's, Fantastic Store it is worth the drive, and Riley knows his stuff.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad to hear that. I was SO grateful for them donating the heads.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @brian nash Thanks for the comment.

  • @TheWVgoodguy22
    @TheWVgoodguy22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Those are some awesome tests to really push their limits. I figured that you would give the slight “edge” to the M3 since it had better edge retention at 425 vs 550.
    I actually have used the Montec before but never on an animal sadly. I went away but came back last year with the Montec CS 100 grain. I won a 6 pack of 100 grain M3s a few months ago, but haven’t tried them out yet. I would have picked the 125s if they had them available at the time.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, the edge retention was a plus for the M3...but the cut size was a minus.

    • @TheWVgoodguy22
      @TheWVgoodguy22 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures yes very true so it evened out ending in a draw.

    • @rickgoing7027
      @rickgoing7027 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures 1/16 of an inch is virtually imperceptible to the eye and probably would have no impact on catching a vein or artery. I would agree they overall should be a tie but I would take the M3 for say an elk because of the edge retention and really wouldn't worry about penetration as evidenced by the same number of layers in the cardboard.

  • @timbow50
    @timbow50 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I favor the M3. Either will make a great option for sure. I think the M3 is a good bone buster design.

  • @jameshagerman7681
    @jameshagerman7681 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I mainly use Tooth of the Arrow solid XLs but did pick up a pack of M3s to try. Hopefully going to put one through a doe in the next couple weeks.

  • @michaelherrell5381
    @michaelherrell5381 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good show. I like the M3. A slight edge over the Montec

  • @timfleming6545
    @timfleming6545 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve hunted several years now with both the Montec and the m3 from both compound and traditional equipment. The m3 is without a doubt quieter in flight than the montec and has become my go to broadhead, the montec is however still a very good broadhead as well.

  • @forevercontrarian3517
    @forevercontrarian3517 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great post and timely for me. I shoot a crossbow. The G5/125 has been my go-to-point for years. However, at 440 FPS, they do tend to drift right after 30 yards. I went to a rear deploy 100 gr and it restored spot on accuracy. But..
    The point I want to share is in-the-field performance. The GR/125 always a pass thru, bear, WT buck and bull elk. I would worry that if the M3 stayed in the animal, it will clog the bleed hole. I have shot length-wise thru several WT bucks, that I throat shoot, with the G5/125 .
    I went back to G5/125 earlier today as I prep for mule deer, bull elk and bear. Now at 375 FPS, spot on at 40 yards. For me, no need to try the solid twin. The rear deploy may come later in the fall seasons for close blind based shots at WT.
    I have nothing but bad outcomes with brands like 150gr Swacker and 100 gr Rage. Others will differ but hopefully they have watched and listened to your thorough presentation.
    Stay safe,
    👍🏹🎯🇺🇸🍀😷💉💉💉👍🏹

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for the comment. Your best bet, by far, is the Sevr Robusto. That is the most durable mech on the market, 150 grs, all steel, and is excellent for crossbows. And with my discount code, LUSKFIVE, you'll save even more money--and the code can be used in addition to their online discounts.

    • @scorchedearth1894
      @scorchedearth1894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Am I seeing this emoji and getting the correct message? Love archery America McDonald’s shamrock shakes and shooting dope? LoL

    • @forevercontrarian3517
      @forevercontrarian3517 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@scorchedearth1894 Yes! All good energy!
      👍🏹👋🇺🇸🎯🍀😷💉💉💉👍

    • @scorchedearth1894
      @scorchedearth1894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@forevercontrarian3517 lol

  • @MA-bc7nd
    @MA-bc7nd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing comparison. Somehow I ordered M3s from Walmart and cost me only $15 but I will see what I can get. The other sellers posted it about $44. They look like great especially after watching your comparison video. All the best!

  • @gerald4133
    @gerald4133 ปีที่แล้ว

    They both look like great 👍 broad heads. 🏹

  • @cwalter2013
    @cwalter2013 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad to see the the M3 is coming out in. 125 grain option. Still just 100grain available online it seems

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not sure how he got it, but I was glad to get the 125 from a buddy. He owns Simmons Sporting Goods in Louisiana, so that's probably how he got it.

  • @tomalderman7598
    @tomalderman7598 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I shot montecs years ago and they were a pita to sharpen. Never really got em as sharp as I wanted. Maybe they make em different now. I’m gonna try some m3’s from my recurve. Thanks !! Great review.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for sharing that Tom. A 60 degree bevel like they have, will only get "so sharp." That's where the Stay Sharp Guide 344 sharpener comes in--it changes the bevel to 44 degrees and thus makes them MUCH sharper.

  • @cfong_sports394
    @cfong_sports394 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's a good one! M3 looked like it had better groups. M3 had better edge retention. Montec has a bigger cut and has good groups. Man the both sunk deep into that cinder block! I definitely think between the two it doesn't matter. I would definitely say it's a draw. If you want a bigger cut, go for the montec, if you don't care as much, m3 is your guy. Great battle!

  • @michaelvstheworld3680
    @michaelvstheworld3680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the Montec. First broadhead I ever used. Fortunately, it was also head that made me discover Dr. Ashby after I hit a doe shoulder and just stopped on a quartering towards. Got one lung I am sure but she was tough and got back into the woods. Next morning i found where she initial laid down, but the coyotes pushed her further north and got her. I found her later picked apart. Never did find the broadhead. Hopefully one of those yotes got a surprise in their bite. I have long since updated my arrow system and heads, but still think the Montec is a solid head.

  • @timothyhall963
    @timothyhall963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Both held up very well the m3 won but they are the exact same head 1 simply sacrificed length and width to fill in the open areas. But overall fantastic job.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, if you want a larger cut than 1 1/16, they're not the exact same head :) Personally, the M3 is way too small of a cut for deer hunting, in my opinion. The Exodus for example has a 1 1/4" cut, and penetrates much deeper, is sharper, and more durable.

  • @robertculpepper1508
    @robertculpepper1508 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well I pick the original montec g5 because I bought 10 packs when Walmart had a clearance at 7.00 for 3 broadheads.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gotta love those sales!

    • @robertculpepper1508
      @robertculpepper1508 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures Love your videos and I share them often. Keep up the good work.

  • @HoldunReed
    @HoldunReed 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hope you get your hands on the Slick Trick Assailant Hybrid and put it through your test.

  • @jolookstothestars6358
    @jolookstothestars6358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    M3 wins because its definitely quiter. Would you rather have a quite bow and a quite arrow? I would,as we all know in archery every little advantage helps.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, all other things equal, I'll take a quite flight arrow. But arrow flight is not a big concern to me if all things are not equal. I use Blazers with a 4 degree helical and they're pretty loud as it is.

    • @jolookstothestars6358
      @jolookstothestars6358 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your input, appreciate all you've done for the archery world.

  • @michiganwoodsman2199
    @michiganwoodsman2199 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you want to keep doing this your going to have to break down Pastor and get a Hooter Shooter. That would prove way more in terms of accuracy. That’s next level stuff. And needed in my opinion. Love the videos!

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Man, I've already looked into getting one. The challenge is the price is about $3500 and then they're not easy to move around. I know my "margin of error" is getting bigger as I get older :)

    • @michiganwoodsman2199
      @michiganwoodsman2199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures wow!!! I’m sorry man, I had NO idea they were that expensive…. Still great videos man!

    • @yourmomma2995
      @yourmomma2995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures a crossbow is MUCH cheaper and same basic principle as a hooter shooter when benched on sand bags.

  • @Beware_Of_Dogg
    @Beware_Of_Dogg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Came here after watching that Montec rip right through a riot shield lol

  • @timl8302
    @timl8302 ปีที่แล้ว

    The real challenger for Montecs is the 'NAP HellRazor'. That would be a true apples to apples comparison.

  • @tray22
    @tray22 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have tried several heads of mechanical nature but always come back to the montec 100gr. I have shot some really nice deer with the montec and all have went down in sight. I tried the ramcat a few years back and clipped the bottom of the spine. It broke two blades and bent the other one so bad it wasn't effective anymore. Montec heads can be used over and over as long as you don't hit a rock.
    This year I have sevr heads for my crossbow and a backup 1.5" sevr for my compound. Hope to take a doe with a sevr to check its performance.
    I would love to see the carbon express quad pro beads tested. I have a spare pack I can send.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. I'd love to test those. My address is 6159 Nottingham Dr, Johnston, Iowa 50131

  • @DSab0624
    @DSab0624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please do Slick Trick standard vs Slick Trick SS3?

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, I only do Battles of heads with very similar specs. You can always look at the score sheets and compare any heads to each other. That being said, I've not done a formal test of the ST Standard. I used to hunt with them though. I've asked ST for some Standards to test, but they've not responded. If someone donates a pack, I'll gladly test them.

  • @AlbuquerqueIrons
    @AlbuquerqueIrons 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bro using the PulsePoint sound clip for your transitions is evil.

  • @mickyfitzko6024
    @mickyfitzko6024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ive been watching alot of videos on broadheads to get some new ones. i used the g5 montec for the last 2 years and they cost me 2 deer one a big 10 point and i will never use them again. so i have decided and ordered the ANNIHILATOR XL broadheads or this year. i really hope they perform well as im an avid bowhunter of 40 years and take it very seriously. i let alot of younger bucks walk to let em grow and watching a buck grow for over 4 years and finally ready to take him my broadheads let me down. never again!!

    • @mickyfitzko6024
      @mickyfitzko6024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      im using my new hoyt ventum 30 this year and hope to break it in right!!

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your experiences Micky. What is it about the Montec that cost you those deer? The Ann XL is a great head. I've not used it on animals, as I prefer a large cut size than it has...but it did very well in my testing.

    • @mickyfitzko6024
      @mickyfitzko6024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures the blood trails were terrible and the buck was hit dead center at 15 yards a tad forward and the broadhead did not pass through i found the arrow and it had went in around 5 inches. I was using a hoyt helix 74 lbs very fast setup. the doe took a step when i shot it and i got atleast 1 lung. there were bubbles in the blood i found but it only bled about 50 yards and then nothing i looked for hours and could not find anything. i used nap thunderhead razors the previous year and never had a problem with pass through including a shoulder shot that busted both shoulders and the deer made it about 30 yards with the same setup

    • @mickyfitzko6024
      @mickyfitzko6024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures i did kill a big 9 point with the broadheads that ran anout 60 yards and i still followed the blood trail even though i seen the deer fall and their wasnt much blood at all and it was a double lung shot

    • @mickyfitzko6024
      @mickyfitzko6024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures even if i see a deer fall i always follow the blood trail to see what blood a broadhead leaves

  • @Chris-oo7lx
    @Chris-oo7lx ปีที่แล้ว

    I used the montec last year and had a nice 1” entrance & exit on a whitetail This year I’ll be trying mechanicals for the first time. Sevr 1.75. Fingers crossed.

    • @Chris-oo7lx
      @Chris-oo7lx ปีที่แล้ว +1

      & thank you for the best broadhead reviews known to man

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  ปีที่แล้ว

      Good luck!

    • @Chris-oo7lx
      @Chris-oo7lx ปีที่แล้ว

      They worked great! Heavy 8 pointer! Michigan.

  • @j.r.outdoors247
    @j.r.outdoors247 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder about an audible difference. I know that I was using Montec's last season and they have a noticeable sound as they almost whistle through the air. I am guessing that this is why G5 came out with the M3- to avoid the noise created by the openings in the Montec.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I commented on that in the conclusion. One of the big advantages of the M3 is the quietness in flight--if that matters to you.

  • @cameronalexander359
    @cameronalexander359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparo

  • @silentassassin1108
    @silentassassin1108 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The m3 shoots about 5” high from my field points. My micro hades hit right with my field points. I think the solid construction just planes bad with my setup

  • @philbrown9774
    @philbrown9774 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would have liked to see giw well theycwould have reshapened using the diamond G5 makes for them.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can see some great demos of that on the channel Innovative Outdoorsman. That guy is the guru of broadhead sharpening.

  • @mdr.leewilliams7242
    @mdr.leewilliams7242 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was once told that if you could get a BH that would cut the animal in half… that’s what you should shoot. Neither of these had much penetration in your gel test and despite pretty marked post shot sharpness tests they had equal penetration thru the layers of cardboard. Neither would make my cut!

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts. While I understand many people like them, I prefer a wider cut as well.

  • @theultimateweeb5859
    @theultimateweeb5859 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this guy my wife would be so pissed if I did this in my basement

  • @bryanheimann5370
    @bryanheimann5370 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is awesome. Have you considered a comparison between the original Montec and the carbon steel Monte?

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, that would be interesting to do. If someone sends me a pack of both, I'll gladly do it.

    • @bryanheimann5370
      @bryanheimann5370 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures where do I send them

  • @cjr4497
    @cjr4497 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if that was a tougher than normal mdf board. They didn't get nearly as penetration as I would have thought. I am interested in a G5 fixed due to their ballistic match point system. Judging by this test they penetrate as well or less than my Sevr 1.5 and 1.7's

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They’re pretty standard. I even cut them from a much larger piece of MDF. Due to their length they have a bit of drag that impedes penetration in mediums like these, that don’t peel back when cut. Meat does tend to peel back when cut-but bone does not.

  • @kevincowan4887
    @kevincowan4887 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I always use G5 cs over stainless they are harder and sharper best bang for your back

  • @blueridgehomestead566
    @blueridgehomestead566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video sir! What would be your go to non mechanical head?

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you. There are so many great ones. I think some of the best all round fixed blade head in the normal price category are the Exodus and Tooth of the Arrow.

  • @tomfisher3117
    @tomfisher3117 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Did one fly truer than the other?

  • @kduffin33
    @kduffin33 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please review the carbon steel head, much more durable than the original Montec and holds its edge much better….while still offering the same amazing flight characteristics

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I'd like to do that. If someone donates a pack, I'll gladly test it.

  • @lonestaroutdoorsman9652
    @lonestaroutdoorsman9652 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bagged my first deer with a compound bow using the montec head he went 25 yards that's my pick

  • @josephtreadlightly5686
    @josephtreadlightly5686 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wasn't surprised that the 125 Montec curled on the tip. I failed to notice that a buck a few years back had his offside leg back a little. Double lunged him but the movement after the shot curled the tip. Huge pressure from the large bone @ the top of the leg where it meets the shoulder. I was never able to get the Montecs scary sharp like u can with the Bishop Holy Trinity. However I lost 1 of them when a doe turned & quartered away as I released my arrow. The arrow stopped after going through the whole body cavity & jammed in her brisket/leg pit. I did find the hair covered in blood from the exit wound. The coyotes got her. My neighbor with greenhouses was happy I took her out. Would have been nice to recover her. She caused alot of trouble for him. I wonder how the Deepower would compare to that M3?🤔

  • @allthingsfishingandoutdoor2841
    @allthingsfishingandoutdoor2841 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve shot the g5 before and it shot strait but dosnt do well gainer shale and dor sharpen to well

  • @verificacionnecessario9190
    @verificacionnecessario9190 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    M3 the only broadhead I will use. It's truly an excellent arrowhead.

  • @-lovefromnh
    @-lovefromnh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Judging by your scores, the edge retention should probably have been the deciding factor. The M3 (from your testing) definitely edged out the Montec. I'm completely unbiased because I have not shot either. But it seemed pretty clear that that M3 just beat the Montec. It's all good though! Great job as always John!! Good luck this season.
    What head(s) will you be using this season and what weight will they be? -Love from NH

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well, the M3 was better in edge retention, but neither were super sharp and it was slightly better in penetration in one of the mediums. But the Montec has a larger cut, so that evened it out in my mind. If I were hunting deer with either head (which I won't be) I would choose the Montec just based on having a larger cut.

    • @-lovefromnh
      @-lovefromnh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures definitely. My uncle and his son both use the Montec. They like the way it flies compared to their practice tips. To each their own. What you do makes a difference. Everyone is able to make a more informed decision. I really appreciate it. Thank you.

  • @samsanfratello7549
    @samsanfratello7549 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    for the sharpness test, at what point would the broadhead be unacceptable to shoot effectively. For example what is the most grams or score would you not shoot at an animal.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a good question, and one that's really difficult to answer. It largely depends on the steel being used and the blade geometry, not just the initial sharpness. Many heads that have thinner blades, gradual bevels, and cheaper steel are super sharp out of the box, but lose that sharpness after passing thru hide--so for most of the animal, they are really "dull." But all that being said, sharpness has little to do with penetration anyway. It does affect the effectiveness of the cutting, but not so much the penetration. And if you push anything with a decent size cut thru an animal, it's going to die.

  • @matthewschneider5724
    @matthewschneider5724 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bought the Montec g5 based on this video and man these broadheads are soooo dull out of the package. They will not even cut paper. I bought the sharpener and it help a tad but still so dull. Is it still reasonable to use such a dull head on white tail? I am a newer hunter and don’t have a ton of experience.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sometimes a one piece three blade Broadhead can feel pretty dull, because of the 60° bevel on them. A great way to get them sharp is to get the stay sharp guide 344. That changes the bevel from 60° to 44° and makes them quite a bit sharper.

    • @matthewschneider5724
      @matthewschneider5724 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! Your content is great and helped me buy a bow, arrows, and heads. Do you think a 27 inch draw length, and fixed Montec g5 is a good setup for whitetail inside 40 yards.

  • @frankbrowning328
    @frankbrowning328 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool battle but so similar that I can't really pick a winner either. I've got a set of 125 gr Montecs that shoot beautifully but because I've heard/read so many mixed reviews I've never hunted with them. After getting the QAD Exodus heads I just never pulled out the Montecs again. Should there ne a G5 Montec vs QAD Exodus video both in 125 gr??

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well, the Montec is 1 1/8" and the Exodus is 1 1/4", so I don't do a Battle any more if the specs are different. But you can compare the scores of each and see the "battle" cause the tests are identical. And in that comparison, there is ZERO comparison. The Exodus is sharper, holds its edge better, more durable, flies better, penetrates deeper and has a larger cut. I can't understand anyone choosing a Montec or M3 over an Exodus.

    • @frankbrowning328
      @frankbrowning328 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures I see. That all makes sense to me. Thanks

    • @archeryhunter86-
      @archeryhunter86- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures One reason someone might choose a Montec over a Exodus is local laws. In Idaho the QAD Exodus is illegal because it is considered to be barbed. I was wanting to switch to those after all your positive comments about them but after looking into it I found out both versions of them are illegal here.
      That said if there are no restrictions QAD Exodus seems like the one to use (although I haven't used either myself).

  • @lspostma
    @lspostma 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I tested the M3 on an elk last September. Frontal shot at 19 yards, exited through his last rib. #topofutaharchery

  • @frosty0419
    @frosty0419 ปีที่แล้ว

    How was the edge retention between the two? The G5 s I had were terrible and deformed on animals. No pass through on an 8 0point with a rib cage double lung shot. It hit the opposite side but didn’t pass. Same bow same set up with a swhackers and complete pass on all other kills. So not the setup.
    Thanks in advance.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't remember; this test was over a year ago. Penetration can depend on so many factors.

    • @kevincowan4887
      @kevincowan4887 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol cap all cap g5 cs all I use best bang for your buck

  • @davetoms63
    @davetoms63 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is your favorite 3 blade? I'm looking for a wider three blade

  • @hatchetjackphillips
    @hatchetjackphillips ปีที่แล้ว

    Montec’s are great broadheads.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep. Tried & true. Wish the had a shorter profile & wider cut though.

  • @SataNick92
    @SataNick92 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro that concert shot hurt to watch

  • @RyzER617
    @RyzER617 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Either is my vote based on your tests.....
    I think user error is the difference

  • @joelaskey2121
    @joelaskey2121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I could put 100 likes to this!!!! Less than 2 min in andm curious…Edited after watching full vid? Original montec a tried and true Bh for many years!!!Awesome comparison Mr Lusk

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not sure what you're referencing at the 2 min mark; there was no editing there.

    • @joelaskey2121
      @joelaskey2121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures I meant I edited my comment

  • @Pwilson0046
    @Pwilson0046 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simmons in Bastrop?

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not sure what that means.

    • @Pwilson0046
      @Pwilson0046 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures Simmons sporting goods

  • @MarkValascun
    @MarkValascun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Metal injection molded? You mean cast?😂

  • @Yelladog78
    @Yelladog78 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing I'm sure of is you're a better shot than me with a bow lol

  • @kingjackson25
    @kingjackson25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a spare pack of NAP DK4 broadheads if you want to try them out.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I've been wanting to test them. Thank you. 6159 Nottingham Dr, Johnston, Iowa 50131 :)

    • @kingjackson25
      @kingjackson25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures sweet I'll get them out to you. I have the 125 grain version. They are on sale at Midway USA for 18 bucks so I bought a bunch of them.

  • @garyk76
    @garyk76 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    420 is what buck knives use in most of their knives

  • @gerald4133
    @gerald4133 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHY NOT USE BOTH!;!??? 🏹

  • @michaelcolthart4006
    @michaelcolthart4006 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you ever had an animal “jump the string” on you?

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh yeah. Check out a vid I have, shooting an impala in Africa. It dropped about 18 inches or so. It's in my Africa Bowhunting Playlist.

  • @aheld79
    @aheld79 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I killed a bull elk pass through with the m3 100grain

  • @roperboy87
    @roperboy87 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Montec hands down

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

    • @roperboy87
      @roperboy87 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LuskArcheryAdventures I was able to laid down to wild hogs with the same broadhead without sharpening

  • @gerald4133
    @gerald4133 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who hunts Concrete or Steel! Animals have Soft tissue! Lings & ❤️

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure. I understand that. The purpose of my testing is to provide comparative data points to see the outer limits of what a head can endure. An angled shot on heavy bone is much more damaging than steel plate or concrete, head on

  • @acanuck3267
    @acanuck3267 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    M3 is for bigger game like elk or moose. Purely from that extra penetration.

    • @ThatJamesGuy88
      @ThatJamesGuy88 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honestly I’m disappointed in both heads penetration. Unless John got some new MDF that inhibits penetration or something, I thought they both should have went to at least 8 inches.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, in theory, but the penetration was WAY less than that of the Exodus or Slick Trick SS3 or Tooth of the Arrow

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      James, you're correct--and same MDF. They don't penetrate as well as many other heads--at least in these mediums. Less surface area usually creates deeper penetration, again, at least in these mediums.

  • @greekmaster1001
    @greekmaster1001 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think anyone is looking for a smaller cut...lol
    That head is out.

    • @jacobwilliams5271
      @jacobwilliams5271 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Some people want more penetration ( that's what she said)

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha. Yeah, neither penetrated very well, compared to the Exodus or SS3 for example.

  • @ericspleet8511
    @ericspleet8511 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lost more deer with that head . Flew great but the penatration was terrible.

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, they didn't penetrate very well in my testing either. Compare them to an Exodus--no comparison.

  • @ryandrewtiger
    @ryandrewtiger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are pointless displays dude

    • @LuskArcheryAdventures
      @LuskArcheryAdventures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, thanks for watching. But pointless? Not at all. The goal of these tests is to provide data points for how each head performs in a consistent test. The tests reveal the limits of what a head can do; it's strengths & weaknesses. Pretty much any broadhead can kill an animal with a well placed shot. But there are some that perform much better than others and thus stack the odds of success more in your favor. By comparing the data points, you can find the head that works best for you and your hunting set up and the animals you're pursuing. For example, if one head loses a blade on one shot thru the steel plate and another looks brand new after 5 shots--all other things equal--wouldn't you rather hunt with the head that could handle that kind of impact?