Goes to show that for motorway and longer distance driving these plug in hybrids are totally pointless! An X5 30D would have almost half of this consumption, when the 45e is out of battery.
i did 3 1200km in one day trips past year ( 2021)and my average consumption was always between 8L and 9L started out with a full battery and ended up empty at destination. overall electric range in those trips was between 115km and 130Km. i don't think that's bad at all. now for my normal weekly driving thats all on electric and everyweekend i do a 2 times trip of around 140 km and i have an overall consumption of 3.8L on those. so yes i still think this drivetrain makes alot of sense.
@@frederikmeire Of course it makes sense. Those who are criticizing are just jealous. You don't make every day trips of hundreds of km. You just drive around the city or close to it. Overall consumption, which should be the last worries at this price range, is just fine.
What is the point of this motorization anyway?? Cheaper 30d with similar performance can go for far less fuel consumption, better long-term durability over time with solid inline6 diesel and no arguable battery disposal issue in the future....old Audi SQ7 with V8 diesel engine has almost half the consumption at the similar speeds (check the video on the channel)
i did 3 1200km in one day trips past year ( 2021)and my average consumption was always between 8L and 9L started out with a full battery and ended up empty at destination. overall electric range in those trips was between 115km and 130Km. i don't think that's bad at all. now for my normal weekly driving thats all on electric and everyweekend i do a 2 times trip of around 140 km and i have an overall consumption of 3.8L on those. so yes i still think this drivetrain makes alot of sense and has obviously more performance then a 30D
@@Mr11ESSE111 You don't use the electricity at those speeds. See the hybrid consumption for a meaningful comparison. The consumption while charging only matters, if you add the additional electric range. In fact, charging the battery on the highway and driving with electricity in town gets you an overall lower consumption than driving in hybrid only and especially when driving without a hybrid. As an example: If you drive in charging mode at 100 km/h, use 13l/ 100 km and generate an additional 70 km electric range per 100 km, your overall consumption drops to 13l/170 km which equals 7,6 l/100 km total consumption. Now consider a X540i and try to get the same consumption, especially in town. Don't just look at big numbers but understand , what is done, before judging it. Most people forget to consider the long term consumption. Fact is: PHEV consume less gas, than the same cars with the same combustion engine, even if you don't plug them in.
F*ck it with consumption about 15l/100km. I saw your review of a new MB C220d - it is a masterpiece. Less than 5 l at speed about 120 and less than 10l at speed about 200km/hour. Only one question to engineers- are you Germans ok? How they can compare pollutions of 15l of petrol vs 5l of diesel? So many stupid "ecological" things like phew/mhew/WTFhew. But petrol is still "better" (but i dont know better than what?) Anyway nice video. Nice video of what you shouldn't buy ever.
You did see, the car was charging the battery while driving and know, that it is a big SUV? You have to consider the additional range into the consumption, as you would use the generated electricity to drive in and around town. Your MB C-Class isn't even in the same vehicle class and it isn't a SUV, so you maybe should get your comparison straight.
@@fwebe2871 so do you think that petrol better than diesel with phew? It must be more efficient with a 3.0 tdi and phew and average consumption can be less. You wrote below in comments that average consumption of bmw from a video is 7.5 l or something. Dont you think that with diesel and phew it could be 5 or 6 l?
@@Mr11ESSE111 Why shouldn't it consume less at lower speeds? The whole benefit of a PHEV is less consumption at lower speeds, as you are using your engine with higher loads in genereal, which benefits the overall effiency. Take the consumption at 100 km/h for example. It equals to about 7,5l/ 100 km, as you can use the electricity to drive at lower speeds. The real benefit by charging the battery on the highway is, to get the highway consumption in town, where the X540i gets higher consumption than highway consumption in town. And that is not even considering plugging it in, which benefits it even more.
Dream car 😍
Goes to show that for motorway and longer distance driving these plug in hybrids are totally pointless! An X5 30D would have almost half of this consumption, when the 45e is out of battery.
i did 3 1200km in one day trips past year ( 2021)and my average consumption was always between 8L and 9L started out with a full battery and ended up empty at destination.
overall electric range in those trips was between 115km and 130Km. i don't think that's bad at all. now for my normal weekly driving thats all on electric and everyweekend i do a 2 times trip of around 140 km and i have an overall consumption of 3.8L on those. so yes i still think this drivetrain makes alot of sense.
@@frederikmeire Of course it makes sense. Those who are criticizing are just jealous. You don't make every day trips of hundreds of km. You just drive around the city or close to it. Overall consumption, which should be the last worries at this price range, is just fine.
You dont know what you are talking about, our 45e has less consumption then the diesel even on long distance travel
Nice BMW!! Good video 😄😄
nice car. but uffff bro, that consumption
High comsuption of fuel😭
It is a big SUV with 3 l petrol engine. What do you expect? And at low speeds it was charging, without that it would have been probably at 8-10 l
What is the point of this motorization anyway?? Cheaper 30d with similar performance can go for far less fuel consumption, better long-term durability over time with solid inline6 diesel and no arguable battery disposal issue in the future....old Audi SQ7 with V8 diesel engine has almost half the consumption at the similar speeds (check the video on the channel)
The point is to lower the consumption, as this powertrain uses less fuel, than the X540i even without plugging it in.
i did 3 1200km in one day trips past year ( 2021)and my average consumption was always between 8L and 9L started out with a full battery and ended up empty at destination.
overall electric range in those trips was between 115km and 130Km. i don't think that's bad at all. now for my normal weekly driving thats all on electric and everyweekend i do a 2 times trip of around 140 km and i have an overall consumption of 3.8L on those. so yes i still think this drivetrain makes alot of sense and has obviously more performance then a 30D
Räder etwas matt 21 Zoll müsste es schon sein
9:46 😢😢
Great performance, beautiful interior except that rombic shape part from climate control. They should change it. Looks like it doesn't fit there.
i think it is biggest consumption ever recorded from any car &vehicle!! why they bother with stupid Phev when consumption are abnormal anyway
I think you missed one car that has more consumption than this bmw x5
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK it doesnt have at 80-100-120kmh !! Mercedes GLK something
At bmw was 0 liter at 80 100 and 120 if battery was full, we want try without battery but didn't work, so only charging mode
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK how long it will be full ,20 minutes at that speeds and then abnormal consumption again
@@Mr11ESSE111 You don't use the electricity at those speeds. See the hybrid consumption for a meaningful comparison. The consumption while charging only matters, if you add the additional electric range.
In fact, charging the battery on the highway and driving with electricity in town gets you an overall lower consumption than driving in hybrid only and especially when driving without a hybrid.
As an example:
If you drive in charging mode at 100 km/h, use 13l/ 100 km and generate an additional 70 km electric range per 100 km, your overall consumption drops to 13l/170 km which equals 7,6 l/100 km total consumption. Now consider a X540i and try to get the same consumption, especially in town.
Don't just look at big numbers but understand , what is done, before judging it.
Most people forget to consider the long term consumption.
Fact is: PHEV consume less gas, than the same cars with the same combustion engine, even if you don't plug them in.
10:06 😂
Комментарий в поддержку канала,спасибо за видео, попробуйте формат езда по городу,думаю будет интересно.
Siti? Ты, блин, серьезно? Юра, йокарный бабай, как так можно? Глаз не режет несостыковка по буквам?
@@alexbuster2946 исправил
F*ck it with consumption about 15l/100km.
I saw your review of a new MB C220d - it is a masterpiece. Less than 5 l at speed about 120 and less than 10l at speed about 200km/hour.
Only one question to engineers- are you Germans ok? How they can compare pollutions of 15l of petrol vs 5l of diesel? So many stupid "ecological" things like phew/mhew/WTFhew. But petrol is still "better" (but i dont know better than what?)
Anyway nice video. Nice video of what you shouldn't buy ever.
You did see, the car was charging the battery while driving and know, that it is a big SUV?
You have to consider the additional range into the consumption, as you would use the generated electricity to drive in and around town.
Your MB C-Class isn't even in the same vehicle class and it isn't a SUV, so you maybe should get your comparison straight.
@@fwebe2871 so do you think that petrol better than diesel with phew? It must be more efficient with a 3.0 tdi and phew and average consumption can be less.
You wrote below in comments that average consumption of bmw from a video is 7.5 l or something. Dont you think that with diesel and phew it could be 5 or 6 l?
@@alexbuster2946 It isn't that much more efficient, if you use a diesel engine as phev, which is one reason, why there are mostly petrol phev.
BMW newer cars start to be more thirsty then ever especially with this phev combinations
Where do you get this from? It consume less than the X540i and makes more power.
@@fwebe2871 not at lower speeds but i talk vs others especially touareg or audi q7
@@Mr11ESSE111 Why shouldn't it consume less at lower speeds? The whole benefit of a PHEV is less consumption at lower speeds, as you are using your engine with higher loads in genereal, which benefits the overall effiency.
Take the consumption at 100 km/h for example. It equals to about 7,5l/ 100 km, as you can use the electricity to drive at lower speeds.
The real benefit by charging the battery on the highway is, to get the highway consumption in town, where the X540i gets higher consumption than highway consumption in town.
And that is not even considering plugging it in, which benefits it even more.
@@fwebe2871 it ests like old kazakhstan tank T-55 !! That batteries gone very quickly and it is BMW,very unreliable car
I need just 50 € to start
This engine make no sense
But why? It consume less than a X540i, makes more power and even has the ability to be plugged and charged.