Who Were the Magi

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2020
  • The Gospel of Matthew tells us that "magi" from the East brought gifts to the infant Jesus following a mysterious star. Western Christianity commemorates this event with the feast of Epiphany, on January 6. What do we know about these wise men? Where did they come? Were they kings or Zoroastrian priests? Is there any evidence of a new star? We'll look at all these and other questions to reveal the meaning of this story from a mythological and theological view point.
    #lecture #cofchrist #zoroastrianism

ความคิดเห็น • 527

  • @mogbaba
    @mogbaba 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    As an Iranian with some reasonable knowledge about the Iranian religion, I am really impressed with the depth of correct knowledge this gentleman has about the case. I really enjoyed this great scholarly lecture, thanks.

  • @donnaprisbrey1452
    @donnaprisbrey1452 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Every Christmastime I have wondered this for more than 20 years. Thank you for finally answering my question.

  • @carlyabush
    @carlyabush 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Thank you so much for these incredibly thorough and well-researched lectures. I’ve gotten more out of these than any traditional sermon. I feel so grateful for finding these-and right near me in Toronto, too. You are providing an antidote to fundamentalism that is so needed in today’s society. I cannot thank you enough for sharing your historical knowledge with us for free on TH-cam.

    • @kenramirez5782
      @kenramirez5782 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus the Christ was born on3AD September 11 you can check it out on TH-cam Dr. Michael Heiser What do the magi and the dead sea scrolls have in common another interesting thing to look at would be the evidence of the shroud of Turin

    • @nataliewantscookies
      @nataliewantscookies 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ditto ❤

    • @carlyabush
      @carlyabush 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nataliewantscookies I forgot I left this comment but this reply brought me back to this channel. I'm going to listen to some more lectures this weekend. Thank you, Natalie!

    • @albusai
      @albusai 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You talk as if being fundamental is a bad thing 😅😅 struggling to be like Jesus is never a bad thing 😅😅

    • @carlyabush
      @carlyabush 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@albusai Of course it isn’t. But anyone who claims to be a follower of Jesus should understand the historical and sociological context that informed the New Testament.

  • @darrellmarshall-uj2lc
    @darrellmarshall-uj2lc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is a thoroughly intelligent, informative, humorous, candid and most entertaining lecture. Thank you.

  • @jorgeledesma6994
    @jorgeledesma6994 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I’m really impressed with this Pastor. He is actually honest about the birth of Jesus. He’s not trying to dance around the historical evidence.

    • @thetruthexperiment
      @thetruthexperiment ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don’t think preachers lie very much. They just aren’t very smart. I’m sure they lie to their wives sometimes.

    • @Kid_Ikaris
      @Kid_Ikaris ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@thetruthexperiment Would you agree though that it's more gullibility than stupidity?

    • @albusai
      @albusai 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@thetruthexperiment😅😅 you know them all

    • @ahmedmahmud4238
      @ahmedmahmud4238 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These are theories. The factual reports say other wise. The theories are second guessing what history has reported. Believing a theory does not make one honest, unless you know as a fact that the theory is true. Which you dont. In other words your mistaking theories with historical facts.

    • @stephrichards4611
      @stephrichards4611 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't know if he's a pastor?

  • @alanbellamy5103
    @alanbellamy5103 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I want to move to Toronto from California just to be able to attend these lectures.

  • @isentropic8279
    @isentropic8279 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    This is enlightening and done with a kind heart and open mind. What a great communication in today’s cynical world.

    • @chancehonotapu4380
      @chancehonotapu4380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      this guy is wrong on all areas concerning the 4 Gospels, which are writing by 4 different people, with 4 different point of views? its not like, Jesus commanded his disciples to take out pen and paper and write as he speaks, but lessons through his Words... And Witnessing Miracles through his Works. (The Ministry of Jesus) Redemption for the Gentiles comes from the Blood, And we were given Grace by Faith in the redeemer with is Christ Jesus its more clear through Pauls Ministry which is still Ministring Today know as the Church Age...

    • @leesnyder9144
      @leesnyder9144 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chancehonotapu4380 interesting

  • @Andromeda2976
    @Andromeda2976 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Absolutely enjoyed it, thankyou!

  • @johnbarr2011
    @johnbarr2011 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It is of particularly interesting that they called Magi. The Magi are what the Zorastians, the ancient religion of Persia, called their priests.

    • @artdanks4846
      @artdanks4846 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly right!

    • @Csio12
      @Csio12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ZOROASTRIAN

  • @dredank
    @dredank 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This was excellent. Great teacher!

    • @kenramirez5782
      @kenramirez5782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Check out Dr. Michael Heizer on TH-cam what do the magi and the squirrels have in common and another interesting TH-cam The shroud of Turin

  • @atlasheyzal9178
    @atlasheyzal9178 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are my go to nightly watch. I love all your lectures and have learned so much!! I love it!

    • @centre-place
      @centre-place  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you like them!

  • @improvingourworld
    @improvingourworld 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Amazing!

  • @tamaraacosta2605
    @tamaraacosta2605 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I really like your words and your teaching thanks and I think is so true

  • @markwolfard3467
    @markwolfard3467 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done. I've been listening for quite some time to John lectures. It's mostly he who speaks and never has to refer to open texts in order to recite. Well educated. Knows his history combined with theology. Have to admit, I enjoy the lack of ads. I can fall asleep listening without needing to skip ads. A nice bonus

  • @rickmcentee9204
    @rickmcentee9204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Super presentation. Enlightening.

  • @lewisham
    @lewisham 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    These videos really bring out the crazies in the comments.

    • @bassinc3039
      @bassinc3039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And here we are.

    • @nosuchthing8
      @nosuchthing8 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not so bad

    • @jojojacques810
      @jojojacques810 ปีที่แล้ว

      Crazy or awakened 😝

    • @kenlarson944
      @kenlarson944 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't have to be crazy to watch youtube, but it helps

  • @katariinavainio4828
    @katariinavainio4828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a brilliant lecture!

  • @markdeegan7268
    @markdeegan7268 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir you are a Great historian and a Good man

  • @VSP4591
    @VSP4591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very good presentation. Congratulation.

  • @reporeport
    @reporeport 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you must be a fantastic paster - love all your vids

  • @maedorasmith33
    @maedorasmith33 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I noticed that the text do not tell how many Magi came it just said Magi came but it did not say three

  • @mrlume9475
    @mrlume9475 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent lecture as always.

  • @BlazeComTV
    @BlazeComTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is good

  • @Immanueladg
    @Immanueladg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks a lot for explanations scientifically

    • @ImJustOnePerson1
      @ImJustOnePerson1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @lost why did you even watch this?

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ImJustOnePerson1 Know your enemy.

    • @ImJustOnePerson1
      @ImJustOnePerson1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HOWBAZARY The speaker not trying to hurt you. Okay, take a deep breath. It's going to be alright. You can be religious and he can try to explain it scientifically, you can coexist. It's okay.

    • @alinajafi4644
      @alinajafi4644 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HOWBAZARY Enemy? Why is that ?

  • @juliebyzewski1868
    @juliebyzewski1868 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful explanation of the contradictory nativity stories.

  • @grlpeterson
    @grlpeterson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's so funny to read so many comments that all think they know better than any other contemporary scholar could possibly know the events that happened over 2000 years ago. While we come up with all the various ways we think of the Magi, how can ANY OF US say or ant as if we KNOW what was what after +2000 years. Just enjoy learning someone else's view about the matter, no matter how different tp you'r own view, celebrate (or discount) the Magi as you set fit, and be within and enveloped by the Heart of our God of Light. Let one another have the views that are theirs, honor their ability to establish those for themselves, and enjoy your own views and what they mean to you. Knowing that you cannot know is more powerful than claiming you know all. And will help keep you humble as we're all should be.

  • @cofoothills
    @cofoothills 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    we don't know the one true, pure, perfect, unadulterated truth - only what people wrote down and didn't destroy thru time

    • @dukadarodear2176
      @dukadarodear2176 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @lost
      No, you don't know the truth because there's no truth to know.
      It's ALL myth and legend.
      In fact it's more likely than not that Jesus, the "Christ" never existed as a real person.
      Grow up and do a bit more objective research.

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Heavens declare the glory of God. The Heavens being the Sun, Moon and the Stars. The Mazzaroth is a literal road map.

    • @kpwillson
      @kpwillson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dukadarodear2176historians generally support the idea that Jesus was a historical figure who did exist.

  • @KASPARFLUECK
    @KASPARFLUECK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Greetings from Kaspar!

  • @dannymathis7275
    @dannymathis7275 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So i guess Herod couldn't see the star? Thank You for this! Great work!

    • @jaredb9523
      @jaredb9523 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's talkimg about space ship or plane just as primitives on islands would explain a plane. A star over the city.

    • @jaredb9523
      @jaredb9523 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @lost so if Jesus died and came back to life with eternal life where is he..? And where did he go? And how did he get there ? Jus vanished? If u say he died I can see how his spirit could travel somewhere but never during his life was he ever capable of teleportation why would he be able to after ? If he left it would have to be in some sort of vehicle unless we telling Santa stories..

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @seeker No, it was a literal star. The Magi studied the Mazzaroth/Zodiac. Astronomy not Astrology.

    • @judithsmith9582
      @judithsmith9582 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Herod was not an astronomer.

    • @christianpatriot7439
      @christianpatriot7439 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      He could have seen the star, but not recognize its significance. His astrologers could have seen it, realized what it meant, but were too afraid of Herod to explain it to him.

  • @katherinebridwell3985
    @katherinebridwell3985 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi John. Listened on this morning Wed. Aug. 2nd. Who Was Mary? Very interesting , Amazing how little there is on her. Liked very much. Thank you. Kathy from Ft. Collins, Coo. Congregation

  • @Hermesborugerdian
    @Hermesborugerdian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Malekyoir could be mix of Hebrew and Persian; Melekh (King in Hebrew) and Yar( friend in Persian) .
    Keep in mind Shahyar is an actual Persian name that has been popular in Iran since Sassanid era

  • @alibala4506
    @alibala4506 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The tribe Mug (Mag), the priests of Zoroastrianism, came from Media (modern day Azerbaijan,) were proficient in many fields, such as astrology, medicine, spell, metallurgy . There are many toponyms related to Mugs still exist in Azerbaijan. In the book of Enoch the fallen angel Azazel thought people who lived in this area to all those things (spell, magic, metallurgy, crafts and so on)

    • @alibala4506
      @alibala4506 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      and the dreams interpretation

    • @Hermesborugerdian
      @Hermesborugerdian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, however due the name of this Iranian median tribe, all Zoroastrians priests started being referred as Mogh (Magi in Persian) in all of Persia

    • @mehryaarvid
      @mehryaarvid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The moogooei tribe of Bakhtiari people are their descendants, in their folklores and everyday believes you see the trace of old believes. Mogu were a tribe

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Book of Enoch is ridiculous and not Biblical at all.

    • @alinajafi4644
      @alinajafi4644 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Hermesborugerdian Yes ..... they were belonged to the "Dayre-Mogan" or club of Maggies.

  • @paulschuckman6604
    @paulschuckman6604 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I hope you do a talk on the Bahai Faith and it's views and beliefs. Baha'u'llah talks about Zoroaster quite a bit. Lately I've started thinking Zoroaster was the beginning of the Magi.

    • @hime273
      @hime273 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ahhh yes, Bahai: the Illuminati Religion.

    • @artdanks4846
      @artdanks4846 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I used to be a Baha'i, and yes, we were taught that the Magi were Zoroastrian priests, that were following a Zoroastrian prophecy when they followed the star to find the Christ Child. I've never found any historical evidence to support that theory. But in a way it might make some sense. The Persian Empire had conquered the Babylonian Empire, where the Jews had been held captive for 70 years. The Persians released the Jews from captivity, allowing them to return to Israel. They were also monotheistic, being Zoroastrian. Many of the Jews chose to stay, so it's conceivable that the Persians could have been influenced by their religious beliefs. It may very well be that they understood enough of the Hebrew Prophecies about the coming of Messiah, to then follow the Star to where the Christ was.

  • @jora1308
    @jora1308 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    After 1:15:14 long video I did not understand who the Magi were. So who were the Magi?

    • @hulamei3117
      @hulamei3117 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There were no magi. It's a story.

  • @mountbeckworth1
    @mountbeckworth1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If when my son was born, wise men/hermits/princes turned up bearing rare gifts, I would remember it. But Mary tells her son to stop wasting time in the synagogue, and no-one in Nazareth seems to point to the adolescent Jesus and say " hey, that's the dude that those wise men visited." And did the family flee to Egypt, or stay in Bethlehem; can't be both.

    • @cindyb8504
      @cindyb8504 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that’s because our Lord was not born in California

  • @youtubezcy
    @youtubezcy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Last phrase was truer than anything said in church

  • @glendoracollier2243
    @glendoracollier2243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can they write questions down to ask at the end so we can keep going

  • @ira-mp3qh
    @ira-mp3qh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Merci

  • @stephrichards4611
    @stephrichards4611 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Matthew's quotes about Nazareth and Nazarene is hotly debated, and there are many other sources that defend and make sense of this position. We should not expect the lecturer to know everything about the full mystery of God, or to lay out every single position in such a short space of time.
    Don't take everything he says as 'gospel' but do your own research. This has been great for me as his challenges to my belief made me search for the truth, and my faith is not swayed. Many church fathers were aware of some of the discrepancies but they were not swayed ultimately.

  • @budsurtees4224
    @budsurtees4224 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A small point that sometimes gets lost in discussions - if the Persians had won their wars with the Greeks (Thermopylae, Marathon, etc) they would have overrrun Europe and Zoroastrianism would have spread throughout the continent as the state religion (Zoroastrian cults such as Mithraism were already popular with the Romans). Christianity would have probably never taken hold, certainly not to the extent it did, and Zoroastrianism would have been the major religion today instead of the almost-extinct status it has today. That's how history works - sometimes all it takes is a battle or two for humanity to change and go off in different directions.

    • @artdanks4846
      @artdanks4846 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very true, that this is how history works. And fortunately, God is the author of that history.

    • @budsurtees4224
      @budsurtees4224 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@artdanks4846 "God" has nothing to do with this. Stop spewing mythological rubbish.

  • @francisanosissi1
    @francisanosissi1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i think i know why leaps of faith are so important now.

    • @yakamen
      @yakamen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it was St. Augustine himself who said a leap of faith was required to overcome the intellect. That wasn't meant insultingly. After all, he was a brilliant guy, and just needed a way to connect with God.

    • @hulamei3117
      @hulamei3117 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Very lengthy leaps required

  • @dave0729
    @dave0729 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Matthew's claim that the messiah was prophesied to be from Nazareth is a midrashic extrapolation from Isaiah 11:1, "shoot from Jesse." "Branch" or "shoot" is "nitser". If you put in other vowels and semi-vowel performatives to NZR you can force out the "Nazareth" interpretation.

  • @anniecarroll8010
    @anniecarroll8010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good lecture, but if they were from different countries, why would they not go home?

  • @mrbluesky5830
    @mrbluesky5830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Brilliant video, thanks! Myrrh is the main ingredient in Chrysm, the holy oil used in anointing. It's still used in the UK to anoint new monarchs in the coronation ceremony, this part was considered too holy to be filmed in the 1952 coronation of Queen Elizabeth so it is was screened off. In a literal sense our monarchs are "Christs".

    • @mrbluesky5830
      @mrbluesky5830 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So presumably chrysm or chrism, is etymologially related to Christ. Both related to Greek words for anointing and anointed (of the monarch at the coronation). Which could be an alternative theory why Myrrh was one of the three gifts, rather than that given in the video about anointing the dead.

    • @yakamen
      @yakamen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is the office of king or queen not the head of the Anglican church? Because that makes sense to me.

    • @mrbluesky5830
      @mrbluesky5830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yakamen yes, head of the Anglican church (also "defender of the faith" the title ironically given to Henry VIII by the Pope), and head of state.

    • @TorianTammas
      @TorianTammas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@yakamenKings and high priests in judaism were both annointed with oil. So all jewish kings and high priests were christs.

  • @mandylynnalbert-nerud1235
    @mandylynnalbert-nerud1235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this lecture in Australia? Would love to talk this speaker

    • @mandylynnalbert-nerud1235
      @mandylynnalbert-nerud1235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Magi reminds me or my mind connects to the arpad dynasty. BC AD time seem to have been recorded by arc rulers of the time year lord

  • @lauravillanueva2175
    @lauravillanueva2175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great historical lecture and demeanor Sir!

  • @shawnboden8
    @shawnboden8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    People quite frequently today report seeing ufos, whatever they are, and they would have been seeing them frequently in ancient times.
    And only a ufo would fit the scenario of being able to be followed, not a star. And also the scenario that ufos are explained away as stars or
    something so as not to be called crazy.

    • @rickmcentee9204
      @rickmcentee9204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh thank God I'm not the only one who thinks this...! 🏆

  • @annepreciado4157
    @annepreciado4157 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Indeed there is definitely a reform during this time...particularly away from animal/human sacrifice

    • @annepreciado4157
      @annepreciado4157 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plus a move away from several gods to monotheism

    • @annepreciado4157
      @annepreciado4157 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanx for the info, btw😊

  • @debirose9950
    @debirose9950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A Blessed Christmas Day to Everyone!!! 🙏
    “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.”
    -John 1:14
    “Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift!”
    -2 Corinthians 9:18
    “He’s the King of the Jews
    He’s the King of Israel
    He’s the King of Righteousness
    He’s the King of the Ages
    He’s the King of Heaven
    He’s the King of Glory
    He’s the King of Kings
    and He is the Lord of Lords
    Do you know Him?
    He’s the wellspring of wisdom
    He’s the doorway of deliverance
    He’s the pathway of peace
    He’s the roadway of righteousness
    He’s the highway of holiness
    He’s the gateway of glory
    He’s the master of the mighty
    He’s the captain of the conquerors
    He’s the head of the heroes
    He’s the leader of the legislators
    He’s the overseer of the overcomers
    He’s the governor of governors
    He’s the prince of princes
    He’s the King of Kings
    And He’s the Lord of Lords
    That’s my King
    Do you know Him?”
    His Name is Yeshua… Jesus!
    If you do not know the LORD, please do not wait another moment...
    “Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.”
    -2 Corinthians 6:2
    None of us knows how long we have on this earth. The only opportunity we are guaranteed to have is right now...
    A: Admit you have Sinned

    “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”
    -Romans 3:23
    “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
    -Romans 6:23
    “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”
    -1 John 1:9
    It is tough to admit that we are wrong. Even before God, we feel we are basically good, and we would like to think we are never as bad as some... we are ALL sinners and can never be good enough to earn our own way to heaven. Jesus spoke to the scribes and Pharisees saying,
    “Serpents, brood of vipers! How can you escape the condemnation of hell?”
    -Matthew 23:33
    They believed that faithfully following rituals and traditions would get them into heaven. We are all like those scribes and Pharisees when we believe we can save ourselves by good works or following religious rituals and traditions. That path takes us to one place only... hell!
    Please listen, there is a way...
    The ONLY WAY...
    B: Believe in Jesus our Savior 

    “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.”
    -John 3:16-17
    “So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household.”
    -Acts 16:31
    “And this is His commandment: that we should believe on the Name of His Son Jesus Christ and love one another, as He gave us commandment.”
    -1 John 3:23
    “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.” -Ephesians 2:8-9
    Salvation is not complicated.
    Jesus said, “Assuredly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will by no means enter it.”
    - Mark 10:15
    A child simply puts their trust (faith) in their parents protective arms. Likewise, we entrust our life to Jesus our Savior, believing on Him and His finished work on the cross. The Apostle Paul defined the message of the Gospel (good news) like this-
    “...that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,”
    - 1 Corinthians 15:3-4
    Jesus, the perfect, sinless lamb, the Son of God, laid down His life and took the death penalty meant for us, dying in our place (read Isaiah 53:6). He paid the debt we could not pay and redeemed us (bought us back) from the power of sin and death. (read John 1:29 / Galatians 3:13 / Romans 3:25)
    C: Confess Jesus is Lord and Savior
    “...that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.”
    -Romans 10:9-10
    “The LORD is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.”
    -2 Peter 3:9
    God fulfilled His promise, sending His one and only Son to die in our place. He has offered us the most precious gift-salvation, the forgiveness of sin, eternal life with Him in heaven. BUT…we must receive that gift. We must confess our sins (read 1 John 1:9 ) and proclaim our faith (belief) in the death, burial and resurrection of God’s only begotten son, our Savior Jesus. Confessing with our mouth requires an outward, public action, not a secret, hidden, timid faith. The Apostle Paul boldly proclaimed his faith so that others could hear and be saved. God’s plan of salvation is freely offered to everyone.
    If you are not familiar with prayer, it is simply talking to God openly and honestly.
    Remember, the Bible says we are saved by grace through faith. God sees our heart. We are not saved by simply saying some special words in a formal prayer. We are saved when we reach out by faith, admit our sin, repenting from believing our actions save us to belief in Jesus and His sacrifice for us, confessing Him as our Lord and Savior. Saving faith produces a forever changed life.
    The Bible is God’s message to us. It’s readily available even online. Please read it.
    Your death penalty has been paid- you have been pardoned...
    The choice is yours to accept it or not. We’re all headed to one of two places - heaven or hell. Will you please accept the LORD’s gift of love today?
    “Likewise, I say to you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.”
    - Luke 15:10

    • @autumn5852
      @autumn5852 ปีที่แล้ว

      Speak fir yourself because we don’t all find it difficult to admit we’re wrong and we don’t all think we’re good and we (not all of us) definitely don’t think we’re better than others 🤔 are you a narcissist? - Because otherwise why do you find it hard to admit when you’re wrong and why would you ever think you’re better than somebody else? 🤔 it sounds like you’ve definitely got some kind of mental health problem.

  • @robertvidal3935
    @robertvidal3935 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting that Isaiah 60 actually talks specifically of people from the islands, then mentions Sheba, Kedar, Tarshish of people going to Jerusalem. Isaiah talks quite a bit of these isles of the East. Not sure if scholars just want to ignore this or really don't think of it.

    • @25centsworth
      @25centsworth 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Strong's H339 - 'iy
      It means an habitable land, distinguishable from the sea or a river.

    • @robertvidal3935
      @robertvidal3935 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@25centsworth The reference to “ships” would distinguish it from a land locked land like Kansas, would you agree?

    • @25centsworth
      @25centsworth 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertvidal3935 If you are referring to Isa 60:9, 'the ships of Tarshish', I think it's safe to assume that the city of Tarshish, wherever it was located, was a port city west of Jerusalem.

    • @robertvidal3935
      @robertvidal3935 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@25centsworth Isaiah 24:25 “East”, “islands of the sea”.

    • @25centsworth
      @25centsworth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robertvidal3935 There is no Isa 24:25. And, 'islands of the sea' is in Isa 11:11. Read it again. There is no 'east' mentioned relative to it.

  • @user-fq4oh6jt9s
    @user-fq4oh6jt9s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The three kings lived in Iran for years preaching to people . There toms are still near to kashan’s city

  • @robertarnold3394
    @robertarnold3394 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gustav Fechner developed an Avestic Christianity. He wrote a book called the Little Book of Life After Death. He is considered to be a pioneer in psychology and also inspired one of the greatest mathematicians in human history Bernard Riemann.

  • @bobsaturday4273
    @bobsaturday4273 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm playing this and he says epiphany was yesterday , thats correct , two years ago and today

  • @rochelbey2025
    @rochelbey2025 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for your presentations very very informative. In the case Balthazar, Balthassar what were the identifying features to distinguish "Arabs from "Africans" if possible?. Why would Western projection of ethnicity have anything to do with it?

  • @racine09
    @racine09 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    who is the speaker ?

  • @icap8830
    @icap8830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought this was about Magi...where exactly from and the purpose!

  • @S.J.L
    @S.J.L ปีที่แล้ว

    The Persians were a branch off of the Corded Ware culture. Apocalypse is also found among the Germanic branch of the Corded Ware, etc.

  • @stevenv6463
    @stevenv6463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1:06:00 minor point but I think the Chinese have historically (and even now to an extent) make you go back to your family's hometown for certain government things. I think it is called hukou

    • @Dhsu4321
      @Dhsu4321 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hukou is a modern invented system and not being implemented in ancient China.

    • @TorianTammas
      @TorianTammas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The romans did not. By the was Jesus is born under the hewish king Herod in one story and under Roman rule in the other story. Neither can be true as there is a ten year minimum gap.

  • @jant4741
    @jant4741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Huge omission, It was the Persian, Zoroastrian Empire that liberated the Jews from Babylonian conquest, slavery. Osmosis of Zoroastrian ideas into The Old Testament was not a result of casual encounters with neighboring religions.

    • @thegardener8972
      @thegardener8972 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There were numerous decentralized copies of the writings of Moses way before the Persians ever liberated the Israelites. They were the only monotheistic religions at the time and that’s why King Cyrus allowed them to return.

    • @jant4741
      @jant4741 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thegardener8972 Zoroastrianism forbid slavery is why liberated. Never read your theory before. Close to a 1000 years before liberated, Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaton was already monotheistic. Believe he was contemporary of Moses, possibly step brothers. Zoroastrianism predates both of them. Mosaic law, how much was penned by Moses is debated by scholars, and Moses certainly did not author the entire Old Testament.

    • @andrewsuryali8540
      @andrewsuryali8540 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Jews in Babylon were not slaves. Ezekiel's story makes that clear. Their lower classes were resettled as farmers along the river. Many of their elites served the royal court of Babylon as elites too. The Babylonians even let the House of David set themselves up as exilarchs, a position they kept well into medieval times. When Zerubabbel, born and raised as a noble in cosmopolitan Babylon, was sent off to rebuild Jerusalem he probably wasn't too happy about it.

  • @jtksworld1747
    @jtksworld1747 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a form of syncronism that this
    Video is increse in numbers of views

  • @thetruthexperiment
    @thetruthexperiment ปีที่แล้ว

    We should read the same books sometimes.

  • @mazdajay55
    @mazdajay55 ปีที่แล้ว

    🤠😘🥰

  • @clifb.3521
    @clifb.3521 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Clearly you are a Loki variant

  • @m.n.karanja9833
    @m.n.karanja9833 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The flaw in historical investigation is that it is never settled. All assumptions are arrived at on the review of scantily available evidence. Should more evidence be uncovered that potentially affects the previous assumption. So on and so forth. It is a far more sober approach to take the experts viewpoints with a grain of salt. It is never in their place to be entirely sure as their line of work doesn't allow that. Rather it promotes enquiry and inquisition more than delivering final answers.
    Experts are prone to bias. Why would Josephus, who lived later, be a more credible source of the historicity of Jesus than his eye witnesses? Is it because he was a historian, and therefore credible, or that he wasn't a Christian? Luke was a Greek doctor who lived in the time of Jesus. Is his account not weightier than Josephus's who has no other corroborating contemporary?

    • @taylorjensen2787
      @taylorjensen2787 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The gossiple of Luke is from a Greek doctor?

  • @platinum_knowledge
    @platinum_knowledge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Myrrh was actually a well known contraceptive at the time. So they brought money, perfume, and contraceptives...lol

  • @nosuchthing8
    @nosuchthing8 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was this done during the pandemic?

    • @yakamen
      @yakamen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it was done before. They moved to virtual meetups during the pandemic, and those just have him speaking to the monitor, no audience due to social distancing. I think they still do services this way. It's actually a liberal church congregation.

    • @nosuchthing8
      @nosuchthing8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yakamen thank you!

  • @user-ho4nw5sf3w
    @user-ho4nw5sf3w 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Most people don't know but there was a fourth wise man He is not talked about much because he brought a fruitcake.

    • @lisaholloway5069
      @lisaholloway5069 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

    • @janeeden919
      @janeeden919 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would have taken a Madeira cake - cheap, but a crowd pleaser

  • @preapple
    @preapple ปีที่แล้ว

    Historians associate Caspar with King Gondophares (AD 21 - c. AD 47) mentioned in the Acts of Thomas. Thus One of the magi may have been a delegate of the same Indo Parthian king

  • @juanamora9513
    @juanamora9513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The prophets would be called mediums or chandeliers at this time. Was the Bible written through automatic writing or just from the prophets experiences?

  • @benavraham4397
    @benavraham4397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🔥 Zoroastrians priests honoring Jesus at his birth makes perfect sense.
    🕎Judaism teaches that there is NO Devil and what appears to be evil, is actually G-d concealing Himself.
    Jesus put himself in opposition to Judaism with his Devil theology.
    But the 🔥Zoroastrians advocated him.

  • @jedidiahsojourner1917
    @jedidiahsojourner1917 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    According to ihe Bible how many of the magi were there?

  • @francisgriffith9398
    @francisgriffith9398 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The professor sounds like he's still in his twenties

  • @janethicks1733
    @janethicks1733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the bible, a star is always an angel.

    • @Eklegomai
      @Eklegomai 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂

    • @esterrios5626
      @esterrios5626 ปีที่แล้ว

      Both Jesus and Lucifer are called star of the morning in scripture! Stuff I ve read but haven't researched!

    • @marietteestabrook4098
      @marietteestabrook4098 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where does it say that?

  • @WoundedEgo
    @WoundedEgo ปีที่แล้ว

    For the first century Jews, was the 2nd Temple more a symbol of fear or of hope?

  • @mogbaba
    @mogbaba 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    28:05 The Parthian Empire which ruled Persia at that time had no state reøigion. Zoroastrianism appeared to become a state religion by Sassanids.

  • @jjbentley9
    @jjbentley9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    They was the size men the occultist from ancient time's magician means wise man a man who understands nature laws and occult law's. It's that simple.

    • @Peter-ci1zw
      @Peter-ci1zw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Unfortunately so was your sentence

    • @Jacob-sb3su
      @Jacob-sb3su 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Learn how to type

    • @jjbentley9
      @jjbentley9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Jacob-sb3su it's called automatic correction and sending it too soon. But thanks grammar police.

    • @lewisham
      @lewisham 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or you know, Zoroastrian priests.

    • @jjbentley9
      @jjbentley9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lewisham that's the same thing as a wise man. Yes lol it gos through out all cultures through out Time.

  • @mikecook7334
    @mikecook7334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The most interesting description, In my opinion, of the three wise men is in the novel BEN HUR by Lew Wallace. They are described as hermits, one from Egypt, another from Greece and the third from India, who each had an epiphany which led them to Bethlehem guided by a star...

    • @bobbybrooks4826
      @bobbybrooks4826 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Book publishing is no different than newspapers magazines radio and TV... Total squat controlled garbage

    • @bobbybrooks4826
      @bobbybrooks4826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Interesting as in insane?

    • @budsurtees4224
      @budsurtees4224 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rubbish. Please stop gaining your knowledge from historical novels and movies.

    • @TorianTammas
      @TorianTammas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We are living on a rotating planet. So the idea to follow a star to a village shows that people have no idea of orientation. In reality magoi are persian priests who read the stars as messages from the gods. So if a great king is born under a certain star conjunction they exoect it to hapoen again under the same conjunction dozens of years later. Tgey were a kinf of astrologers with a firm base in the belief that the will of persuan gods is shown in the stars.

  • @fantasia55
    @fantasia55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bethlehem was a mere village back then. There's no reason to expect Josephus or any other writer to mention the murder of a few dozen, at most, children, especially if Herod did not publicize why he ordered it.

    • @ivermectin7928
      @ivermectin7928 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Derp derp derp. Fictional stories by fiction writers.

    • @kaloarepo288
      @kaloarepo288 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The story of Herod murdering children actually refers to the fact that Herod actually murdered his own sons (by princess Mariamne)because he feared that they and their Jewish mother were plotting to overthrow him.Herod himself was not Jewish but his wife was -of the Jewish royal dynasty of the Hasmonaeans so Herod's sons,having a Jewish mother,would have been more entitled to the throne than Herod himself.

    • @fantasia55
      @fantasia55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kaloarepo288 Herod murdering his own sons shows that he would not have hesitated to kill a few dozen peasant children.

    • @marietteestabrook4098
      @marietteestabrook4098 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Killing his own kids would have been newsworthy by Josephus. Nobody liked Herod.

  • @skepticalbaby7300
    @skepticalbaby7300 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think this a misunderstanding of Persian policy. Even after 200 years of rule in Bablyon, chaldean religion was still thriving there. Same with Canaanite religion and egyptian religion.
    U really don't get an empire with a policy of religious exclusivity until the time of the roman Constantine 500 years later.

  • @benavraham4397
    @benavraham4397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Idumeans fully converted to Judaism🕎 in the generation before Herod, and were eventually absorbed into the Jewish people leaving no trace.
    They converted because the Jewish king Hyrcanus conquered them and ordered them to either leave the Land of Israel, or convert to Judaism. So they converted to Judaism🕎, but remained among themselves.
    Read Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews," book XIII, chapter IX.

  • @fearlessjoebanzai
    @fearlessjoebanzai 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "I'm herry happy that you all rerembered" - OK, thanks.

  • @kilowhiskeyalpha6078
    @kilowhiskeyalpha6078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    King is a spiritual title, the highest state of consciousness, as Yeshua was also called a king. It derives from the crown or aura that emanates from the head of the enlightened, art depicts this aura as a halo.

    • @JohnBrown722so
      @JohnBrown722so 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh also the Maya knew about it it's almost like how the Statue of Liberty is depicted with you could actually see almost like I guess horns or rays beaming off one's head connected to a spiritually enlightened beings.

    • @kilowhiskeyalpha6078
      @kilowhiskeyalpha6078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JohnBrown722so Yes it is the crown and also the origin of unicorn, the spikes are known as horns and the Greek word for horn is Cornus. People who are thought to be divine are also depicted with horns like Moses or Alexander the Great.

    • @kilowhiskeyalpha6078
      @kilowhiskeyalpha6078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JohnBrown722so Yes it is depicting the crown of an enlightened being. The spikes or rays are called horns and the origin of the word unicorn the Greek word for horn is Cornus. Revered persons who are believed divine are also depicted with horns for the same reason people such as Moses or Alexander the Great.

    • @herzkine
      @herzkine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kilowhiskeyalpha6078 correct me if i am wrong but thats a latin word, but incorrectness like this fits the General pseudo enlightened babble here.

    • @herzkine
      @herzkine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      King is also a word from the german language tree, and if there was some special concept beware how much gets lost in translation. Bit easy you put it here, it like the " word " in the which was Logos in greek , which already was translated and still had more the meaning of thought or concept. Same here with the word King, to apply it to a concept of the hebrew word is neglecting simple at Best.

  • @juanamora9513
    @juanamora9513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Astrologically it would be about by the positions of the stars at the time could have come to a conclusion that at a certain time or date someone like jesus that they were expecting would be born, by some sort of natal chart interpretation of the stars at that time.

  • @delightfulBeverage
    @delightfulBeverage 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    since there was no star, I guess "wise" meant something way different back then... like screwed up on hashish

  • @howfarisawaydf4497
    @howfarisawaydf4497 ปีที่แล้ว

    Doesn't it say The Child greeted the Maji at the door? Not as an infant?

  • @bobbybrooks4826
    @bobbybrooks4826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Magi... Persian wise Men Al la Mani.....

  • @sethcartner2996
    @sethcartner2996 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He says that Satan didn't exist in the early Jewish religion, but I'm wondering, what about the Satan, or adversary in the book of Job?

  • @juanamora9513
    @juanamora9513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There were a few herods in the bible. Herod the great, herod archelau, herod of antipas

  • @thechatteringmagpie
    @thechatteringmagpie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is that traditionally there are three gifts; the gold, frankincense and myrrh, potentially a theological allusion to the Trinity?

    • @letsomethingshine
      @letsomethingshine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All three represent the focuses of religion. They can represent what religion is worth in metaphor.
      Gold is old and valuable, like religious truth. Frankinsense is beutifying and sense-appealing, like religious ritual. Myrrh is hard/bitter and effective, like religious work.
      Gold is an old king (should be yellow, lol). Libanos is a young white king. Myrrh is a mid-aged brown king.
      Yellow, White, and Brown. Truth. Beauty. Work.
      A story can highlight the point, but obviously a story can also confuse it.
      1. Gold is a precious metal which is hardly a weapon (the worst weapon really), so it is used by priests/rich as decoration because it lasts does not tarnish and so the military men do not break down the religious icons etc during times of war (when weapon metals are needed). As such, gold "appeals toward supernatural/eternal reality (aka the world is violence but religion is lasting peace)" Gold is thus tested by fire (purity) and water (density), to reveal it's eternal truth.
      2. Frankincense means "true/pure/best incense." But the Greek word used was "Libanos" which means "white" or "Lebanon" and indeed was the name of resin from Boswellia trees spice/incense pain-reliever from the Lebanon area. Such "Lebanese incense" would have been used in religion a lot, especially where people didn't shower and the homeless where allowed entrance. Take that for what you will. As such, white incense "appeals toward making things appealing" Frankincense/Libanos is thus used through burning it as sacrifice to attain something worth in the short-term. The incense was used in burnt sacrifices and obviously in cremations.
      3. Myrrh is "bitter" brown colored resin from thorny trees. It could be made into oil used by religion to preserve things like in embalming the dead or oil-pickling (as opposed to vinegar pickling) of food. It could also be used as an incense. It is also a pain reliever. And was a main ingredient in Anointing oil (you anoint the sacrifices so they burn better, and you anoint the High Priest and the King so they "symbolize" that they are "sacrificing" by "serving the people as leaders" ). As such, brown oil "appeals towards making things that are perishable either perish better or last longer depending on the need."

    • @bass9351
      @bass9351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well said. Typical no 1 picks up on these specific things. GOD b with u

    • @luizverdecanna8023
      @luizverdecanna8023 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It´s extremely complex, the anonymous author of Matthew wrote decades after Jesus death. Did he guess on behalf of Matthew that this narrative was the correct one. Nobody knew about Jesus when he was born then when he died they realized he was the Son of God, the author knowing that Matthew was a jew who followed the Hebrew Scripture tried to add the tradition into Jesus life. This also happened on Matthew 5:17 (“Do not think that I have come to abolish Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”) Jesus had nothing to do with the Laws he was a transgressor and total liberal, did not wash his hands before eating, did not accept tithe, embrace women, the leper, did not respect the Sabbath,, ate pork. INRI on the cross meaning "Jesus the King of Jews" romans put there because jews asked them to mock Jesus. Matthew pushed Jesus into the Old Testament, no wonder we call today the Religion "Judeo - Christian"

    • @dessiewatkins1006
      @dessiewatkins1006 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is more likely that the gold, frankincense, and mir were the required traditional gifts which dispossessed nobles offered to a foreign king as a way to gain peaceful assylum in that ruler's land. That is what stirred confusion over whether Herod's reign was truly appointed by God, since the Jews knew that Herod was appointed as King by authority of Rome, yet these noblemen did not offer him these gifts.

    • @STho205
      @STho205 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@luizverdecanna8023 Matthew is a symbolic code name. The gospels accepted into testament by later councils were not traditionally named.
      Read Isaiah and it associates the savior/deliverer... The reed that bends but does not break... With the three ritual elements.
      It is likely the medieval traditions of three wise men, instead of the unnumbered group in Matthew, were to symbolically cement the Trinity concept by symbolism. There were three gifts.
      Three sons of Adam
      Three sons of Noah to populate the cleansed by water Earth
      God, the Son of Man and The Comforter
      European scholarly leaders were also very tied to Socrates and Plato with the Earthly symbolism of the perfect unseen thing. Also the Plato assertion that all men were born evil through their original essence.
      Now go read the second book of The Republic about the fate of a essence pious man that appeared in the City.... And what happens to him. A little story/parable from 390bc.

  • @nenitaschmidt7197
    @nenitaschmidt7197 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ophir, Tarshis, Sheba and Seba

  • @juanamora9513
    @juanamora9513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Magus or magi is a magician or someone who practices magic, or anything seen as a mystery by the people which would include astrology or even astronomy at the time.

  • @MrDouggee
    @MrDouggee 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Zoroaster was a Brahman and came from the Indus valley. Brahman was what the descends of Abraham were called this is confirmed in the last book written by Issac Newton. In the first chapter of Malichi it says everyone except the Jews are offering good sacrifices to the lord. Which means Zoroaster taught everyone about Mithra was more correct than the Jews not teaching about a coming Messiah.

  • @reynaldogonzalesgodofthemu8492
    @reynaldogonzalesgodofthemu8492 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    After Reynaldo Gonzales observation of a Star humage to pay

  • @SteveAdamsChannel
    @SteveAdamsChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First, thank you for the interesting and accurate information provided here. I can respect the time it takes to research information from the annuls of time and try to present it in bite sized chunks for consumption for the masses. One item I'd like to consider (I watched the video but can't recall if it was brought out here so I'll state it). The whole idea and traditional tale of "3 wise men", (which traditionally derives from the 3 gifts and fictitious nativity scenes) vs "wise men", should be addressed in my opinion if facts are significant in the presentation. If facts are not important then I would question the benefit of the work. It also makes other information provided "questionable" at best. Representing your denomination should be secondary to truth in my opinion.

  • @igaluitchannel6644
    @igaluitchannel6644 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Strange that they are praised when they likely used astrology and divination to determine when and where they should go.

  • @bass9351
    @bass9351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Magi r Chaldean from Babylon. Magi in Aramaic means astrologer. The east is always referencing Babylon not Persia.

    • @dannymack9636
      @dannymack9636 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They actually might have been instructed through the ages until Jesus was born by Daniel, it may have been one of the things Daniel had to seal up until the end days. Any how I agree they came from Babylon or Persia and Daniel's teachings or instructions has a lot to do with it. God bless you mate.

    • @Hermesborugerdian
      @Hermesborugerdian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The word went from Persian into Aramaic later, on however it strictly refers to Zoroastrian priests. Mogh was one of the many Iranian tribes who chose the priests which is why they gave their name to this entire class of people

    • @bass9351
      @bass9351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hermesborugerdian other way round Chaldeans were the teachers in that whole region after the empire fell persian ruled and they used persian instead of Aramaic

    • @Hermesborugerdian
      @Hermesborugerdian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bass9351 actually that’s not true, The Empire kept using Aramaic even under Persian rule, it’s just that the concept of Magi is a very Aryan concept that came from Persians, however I agree with you that astronomy was a Babylonian thing so the Association of astrology with the Persian Magis may had to do with Persians ruling over Babylon. However you must keep in mind that by the time Jesus is born the capital of Persia is Babylon and that’s the period that Chaldeans are declining and Babylon is known as a highly Jewish and Persian place.

    • @Hermesborugerdian
      @Hermesborugerdian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Spolierman I’m pretty much agree with you, however keep on mind Persian province of Assurestan is basically Syria, while Mesopotamia was Ctesiphon with a high Persian and Jewish population by Sassanid era

  • @knowone3031
    @knowone3031 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wall St is Wailing Wall extension project

  • @juanamora9513
    @juanamora9513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why would the 3 be found in Persia? Didn't they each go back to their own countries and die there?

  • @dystopic6245
    @dystopic6245 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m curious why no one makes any connection between the ancient Phoenician “bee kings” priests to Ishtar/ Astarte/ Venus, known as the Essenes, the Gnostics, the Sophists (Sophia is “wisdom” in Greek) rhetoricians of Greece that caused the death of Socrates, could also be of the same group as the “wise men” or “ three kings”, and also the scribes, the lawyers, the sopherim, that Jesus accuses along with the Pharisees as false interpreters of the law,
    There were 3 sects of Jewish leadership in Jerusalem at the time of Jesus according to Josephus:
    The Sadducees
    The Pharisees
    And the Essenes
    I believe the Essenes were the perpetuators of the written law, but manipulated the understanding of it through ecumenical councils, that outwardly appeared righteous, but were inwardly greedy for wealth, power, and prestige.

  • @Rannsack
    @Rannsack 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The oldest surviving manuscript (K1) of an Avestan language text is dated 1323 CE. There was certainly an ancient Persian religion that used some symbols and god names found in Zoroastrianism that goes back to darius or before. But I think we need to be carefully about the EXACT traditions and beliefs we apply to that ancient religion. Just because the 14th century avesta uses the same god names does NOT mean the none of the religious beliefs changed one iota between 1000BC to 1300AD. 2000 years is a long time. Or does the oft talked about "game of telephone" only apply to Christian texts?. It is possible Zoroastrianism borrowed material from Christianity and Judaism. Evidence for that would be the some of similarities found in the Avesta to the Christ story. Written copies of the Christ story PREDATE the copies of the avesta we have, so it is illogical (and a violation of the methods of modern historical scholarship to try to apply the influence in the opposite direction.