Kerbal Space Program Munar Speedrun -
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2017
- Back in the day of KSP 0.9 I built an epic rocket able to to to the Mun and back in under an hour, but 1.0 nerfed the rocket thrusts and ISP, and added in deadly reentry effects. After building a 7000 part rocket massing 127,000 tons I spent 2 hours boosting it up to 8km/sec before completing the run on a livestream.
(apologies for the bad audio, at 1 minute mark, not sure how that happened, it does fix itself).
I should have checked my Staging www.bonfire.com/check-yo-stagin/
Unedited Version: • Kerbal Space Program -... - เกม
![[ไฮไลต์] แบดมินตันชาย SHI Yu Qi (จีน) vs วิว กุลวุฒิ (ไทย) รอบ 8 คน | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f7z7taforOM/mqdefault.jpg)
![บุษบา - เมนทอล [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IGnWPokSEis/mqdefault.jpg)
The shortest distance between two points is a straight line... with a suicide burn at the end and some unintended explosions in the middle.
Jett Quasar the earth changes the curvature of space-time and thus we are not working in Euclidean space so the shortest distance is not a straight line
It depends on your frame of reference. Also note that moving at relativistic speeds will decrease the distance between two points even further.
And with a wormhole the shortest distance is always 0 ;)
Since both bodies are moving, the path will not quite be a straight line...
But of course, the optimal in terms of time is accelerate half the distance, decelerate the other half...
... Except in a rocket, because so much of your mass is fuel, the optimum is actually a massive impulse burn that burns as much fuel as possible in as little time as possible....
Ehhh. Too complicated. XD
Damian: Euclidean geometry only applies to planes, so while a straight line is impossible on a planet (technically, works just fine from our perspective) in space you can treat yourself as on a plane by ignoring the third dimension. Some adjustment of your orbit might be required though to get into the right plane. I'm tired of people saying Euclidean like it means something. It's a set of 5 postulate for lines on a plane.
Furthermore, that's not how gravity works. The way that it curves space is that you fall toward the object. For all intents and purposes it is just a force. If you have enough thrust you can just go in a straight line in space, more or less. At least if you lead the target properly. Maybe some slight adjustments here and there.
Kuralthys: What you said regarding acceleration is accurate if you aim for empty space, but if you want to land you also need to save enough to fight the gravity.
Every time Scott briefly touches a planet (Or moon) before launching off back to space made me imagine a UFO landing on Earth with crowds gathering around just to boop the ground and take off again.
Riffe520 hah!
yeah he could at least walk up and down making 'beep beep' noises,
Aliens land
See two seconds of reality tv
Burn spacerubber
Alpha Centauri to Earth and back Any% Speedrun
Pretty sure if this were real life it would lower the fps, too.
Actually the area nearby the launch pad would be full of smoke
Golden joke
edit: if you meant time dilation
No pun intended
So we are living in a simulation after all. Fucking Aliens can't even programm rigth.
In real life we also have a pixel, the Plank lenght.
scott is a kerbal space program speedrunner, in a biblical sense.
+SuperAWaC no pun intended
@@scottmanley Hey, I was gonna comment that!
@@AirNeat you was late, one year
@@MeridionWanderer I can't even figure out what the pun was anymore lol
1970: I wonder what the future will become of
2019: Speedrunning from earth to the moon
Like could you imagine literal races to the moon.
@@grimp7346 Watching this video I imagined that this was in the Soviet Union and the Moon landing was only an hour away from touching down. But in order for it to be brodcast the cosmanout needs to have return safley.
I just texted my wife, who is 1,000 miles away, 'I love you, in the biblical sense, no pun intended'. Awaiting response.
Has there been a reply yet?!
Come on man, the suspense is killing me here.
How's the divorce going
REST IN PEACE Ryan Siegman.
It has now been a year...
I wasn't watching closely and freaked out when Scott said 1000 *kilometers* a second.
I'd call that 54.6 seconds to orbit. Damn that's quick!
Matt Parsons 52 seconds
In the biblical sense of course
@@thedcrwuft at the end of the video you literal crab
Congrats on getting into Guinness World records gamer edition 2019!
The concentration intensifies part was pretty funny
In a biblical sense
Intesifies*
gmansplit Oh damn I missed that lmao
Mic audio boosts a ton @15:55
Really sorry about that....
A wild Scott Manley in his natural habitat.
Blues Brothers
I hate Illinois Nazis.
*Drives for a half hour with a rod thrown through the block*
"Finally! Ive been waiting my whole life to walk on Mun, and now it's... oh right ._."
I love these ridiculously titanic rockets. You should have a second absurdly colossal rocket waiting on the mun so the command module can dock with it and then instantly blast off back to Kerbin. Think we can get the Kerman on board pinned to his seat for almost the entire round trip journey?
Was glorious to watch you do this on stream. GG Scott.
5:55 what a beautiful Kerbalev Cross!
How about a challenge for the fastest orbit around kerbin? I wonder how much faster than a normal orbit you can get.
no pun intended
Um, that's what he did at the end of the video -- you *did* watch the entire video, right? (Answer: 1 minute)
M Reed No, i did not mean the time to orbit. What i mean is the time from flying in orbit to getting back to the exact same position in orbit after surrounding the planet. For example, start above the north pole, fly over the south pole and back to the north pole (launch and landing not included, time starts in flight).
so you weren't joking. the orbit speed is fixed for an altitude. if you thrust prograde, your orbit goes higher.
unless you thrust at an angle inclined towards the planet center...
The problem with that is that an orbit with a higher velocity means you need to be closer to the object you're orbiting; adding more speed just makes your orbit elliptical. On Kerbin and other planets, you can only go so low before you hit the atmosphere. On the Mun and other bodies without an atmosphere, you can only go so low without hitting mountains.
I really miss a "hello it's Scott Manley" at the beginning of a KSP video.
I am new to KSP. The idea of your groundbreaking liquid fuel rocket booster was amazing power. Wow!! I immediately imitated it and incorporated it into the first stage rocket.
15:54 Holy shit you spooked me with the sudden spike in volume!
Really enjoying these videos
Direct ascent at a whole new level
"Its full of boosters" 0:39
Clever.
Excellent Quality MOAR BOOSTERS
No pun intended
"My God, it's full of stars" is a famous line from the Kubrick classic "2001: A Space Odyssey". I believe the line wasn't actually said on screen until the sequel ("2010..") but that's not important. Scott's line was a play on that.
@Pseudocoder78 its terryfying how younglings don't know the reference :(
There is 3. 2010, 2060, and 3001
iirc it's not explosions, it's rapid oxidation.
J U S T A D D M O R E B O O S T E R S
Almost one million subs congrats
that fairing made definitely sense, aerodynamically
" I built an epic rocket able to to to the Mun"
I built an epic rocket able to toot two Muns
FTFY
Augh, the ADR blew my ears out. I trusted you Scott!
Make a biggest ship, but with the most clipping parts ►A big small ship◄
0:46 for me sounds more interesting than usual M&B challenge
Our House rules for Mun and back racing(lan party), must land on landing gear, must be stable (5 second landing wait) landing back at launch center, must be actually survivable. (Glimits must be on) can't die from G's parts and kerbals or heat. Much more of a challenge. :D
What a great build, no pun intended.
"I'm dropping boosters on a Muuunkerbal... Muunkerbal, Munkerbal" - Cat Kerman
Ive beaten this. 5 Minutes to mun 3 minutes back. ALL stock
Real time or game time?
But now in Realism Overhaul!!!
Lol:P
It's funny that the shortest way takes the most Patience
NASA: “It takes about 3 months to reach the moon”
Scott Manley: “Hold my beer”
More like 3 days.
Can't wait to see this in KSP 2
My God, it's full of boosters- Scott Manley, I like it
There's not many things more satisfying than a high speed re-entry in the biblical sense.
phooey on your fancy liquid rockets. It's solids or nothing!
Steadyyyy....*boop*...FULL SPEED AHEAD!!!!
Great performance as a singer =)
twitter.com/DJSnM/status/936139531153129472
D: sound levels! Definitely woke up tho.
SCOTT DID A SWEAR :O
Today, I found out why the moon has so many craters...
It's the Damn Kerbal smashing into the ground at 4305772 c
The taste of love is sweet when hearts like ours beat I fell in love like a child ohhhhh but the fire was wild I fell in to a burning ring of fire I went down down down and the flames went higher and it burns burns the ring of fire the ring of fire
That was pretty cool. No pun intended.
Who needs parachutes when you can add more rockets?
Rumor is that Scott's CPU melteddown so hard it is still melting through the ground on it's way to china. Lol
love the rawhide lyrics.
Fun fact. Had they done that that for Apollo, they would have saved the mass of a toilet. No pun intended
Lol
New upload :D
Man if you would put a black mustache on, you'd literally look like the white Steve Harvey!
Yeah. People should indeed watch the Blues Brothers. If for no other reason than for the youth of today to see who Cab Calloway is, and likewise, what class looks like.
Belushi's scene where's he's groveling before Fisher is a classic
That entire movie is a string of classic scenes... and then SNL persisted to make movies :\
If you take a large tank, you can put a single vector in the middle and then with 6 part symmetry place 6 more around it creating a 7 booster cluster instead for the stock 4. Needless to say, it’s more powerful and easier to control, if it’s not “lagging”.
Blues brothers... best film ever I love it
Oh dude so close!
5:25 Fry and Laurie used to do "No pun intended" thing.
8202 meter per second when the game crashed... thats 18k miles per hour. thats about mach 24... thats how fast the meteorite was going that killed the dinosaurs.
Still only half the speed of voyager 1...
Damn this easy mode. I struggle to land my craft under 3000 m/s in extremely steady orbit without everything blowing up and you just suicide at 8000 m/s in a vertical landing. I guess later versions got more realistic and complicated in regards to that since I can remember it being that easy before.
concentration intesifies indeed.
[Outsider looking in... DO not shoot the Messenger]
Although its starting to look like it, you have a long way to go before you've got The Sunprobe Rocket... [yup.. showing my age there ]
Jebediah Kerman aproves this design.
What about Piper Kerman, or Magte Kerman?
This is how Hollywood movies understand space travel actually.
I’m not drunk you’re the drunk one, you can’t just decide that I’m drunk, I’ll decide when I’m drunk. That’s for me and GOD to decide.
This is hilarious
I Love you scott manley
Kerbal Space Program cannot do Lagrange Points (in the Biblical sense), unless a certain mod is installed. No pun intended.
Replace Rawhide with Raw Fuel, in the song
For more drunk Scott!!
Here is a idea. What if you have a ring of boosters on the Mun. You then aim for it and land in the center of the boosters. Then dock with the booster ring and take off. That could give you extra trust coming back.
If there’s anything you ever, always need more of, it’s boosters. Full stop. Don’t stop. Don’t stop adding boosters.
Add so many boosters you break the laws of thermodynamics and make the universe collapse on itself
So far I only have one successful munar landing, I forgot the legs and had to do a thruster landing :-/
I have yet to have enough fuel for a return trip.
MOAR BOOSTERS
Shut up CPU, we are using more boosters!
That first ship looks like something out of space cowboys
I can’t even launch a rocket without it crashing
you might have too high cholesterol levels
Isn't that the whole point of rockets?
Thats why there are pilots
I can't even think about getting KSP without a rocket crashing
You are insane xD
Stock torchship ftw! In a biblical sense.
MOAR B...oh...
15:09 Dove from above. Not many will get that one :)
Also, 114 Gs. How did he survive??
Inimbrium twas. Robot
I like how you had to explain to your viewers that the far side of Mun is in fact, further away.... because of planets being curved.... no fucking shit
A winged craft using atmosphere for lift while staying high enough that the drag isn't dominant all while thrusting towards the horizon may be a fast method of orbiting.
willis936 Congratulations! You invented space planes.
lol
Whoops I meant for this to be a response to a comment talking about fastest time to do one full orbit.
i thought you said "Ring of Fart" at first. lmao
Standard NASA hiring procedure
17 895.49 MPH!
"THUNK"
Sorry dropped something.
I've just got one word to say about your dove from above reference - Eranu
Uvavu
M O R E B O O S T E R S
I did to the moon not back 1:30:00, I just did asparagus staging with vectors, then Evaed 20000 meters above mun then ya
It's like the MOOSE system, in reverse... Man into space, quickly. MISQ.
Stupid delta-v challenge : launch vertically at sunset, burn enough delta-v to end up in a retrograde sun orbit, half a year later rendez-vous with kerbin and survive reentry and landing.
+Benou oooh this rocket could do that
easiest way to make a nuclear bomb irl: have an install of ksp and load that craft.
Surely Mun Kerbals should be called Klangers. Pun intended
More appropriate name: Its Boosters all the way down.
Hah, i reached 6 xenameters away from kerbin in 10 seconds
(It was a submarine attempt)
Does speedrun on livestream. Doesn't time it. Great stuff. :)
+sixstringedthing game has a clock built in!
Scott Manley of course it does, but typing "Does speedrun but forgets to pay attention to MET at crucial moments of play" felt a little unwieldy. ;)
Thanks for flattening the KSP learning curve for us relative beginners.
I would like to see a von Neumann probe challenge