Taiwan has a secret doomsday plan for China

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ค. 2023
  • Invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks: www.masterworks.art/caspian
    Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more. How Masterworks works:
    -Create your account with crypto wallet or traditional bank account
    -Pick major works of art to invest in or our new blue-chip art fund
    -Identify investment amount, there is no minimum investment
    -Hold shares in works by Picasso or trade them in our secondary marketplace
    See important Masterworks disclosures: mw-art.co/37WwvbD.
    A #Taiwanese attack on the #ThreeGorgesDam could wipe out the lower #Yangtze Basin, destroying military and industrial installations and flooding major cities.
    Support CaspianReport
    ✔ TH-cam membership ► / @caspianreport
    ✔ Patreon ► / caspianreport
    ✔ PayPal ► www.paypal.me/caspianreport
    ✔ Merchandise ►teespring.com/stores/caspianr...
    Crypto endorsement
    ✔ Bitcoin ► 1MwRNXWWqzbmsHova7FMW11zPftVZVUfbU
    ✔ Ether ► 0xfE4c310ccb6f52f9D220F25Ce76Dec0493dF9aA0
    ✔ Bitcoin Cash ► 1BKLti4Wq4EK9fsBnYWC91caK7NZfUhNw9
    Join us on Facebook or Twitter
    ✔ Twitter ► / caspianreport
    ✔ Facebook ► / caspianreport
    ✔ My equipment and editing software ► www.amazon.com/shop/caspianre...
    Watch CaspianReport in other languages
    ✔ Spanish ► / historiageopol%c3%adtica
    ✔ Russian ► / thecuriouscat
    #ad #sponsored

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @CaspianReport
    @CaspianReport  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

    Invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks: www.masterworks.art/caspian
    Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more. How Masterworks works:
    -Create your account with crypto wallet or traditional bank account
    -Pick major works of art to invest in or our new blue-chip art fund
    -Identify investment amount, there is no minimum investment
    -Hold shares in works by Picasso or trade them in our secondary marketplace
    See important Masterworks disclosures: mw-art.co/37WwvbD.

    • @camillesemaan7325
      @camillesemaan7325 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amigo, this is not legit. It’s a Ponzi scheme that will only keep making money until new people stop signing up.

    • @maximianocoelho4496
      @maximianocoelho4496 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      @Kris P. Bacon Just let him do it...Nothing better than to take money from a scammer. Skip the ad and he receives his pay check all the same.

    • @lastpsycopath
      @lastpsycopath 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maximianocoelho4496 who you advertise for in turn helps or hinders your own credibility.

    • @Valdaur
      @Valdaur 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maximianocoelho4496 Well, the scammers technically must be making enough money in return from these sponsorship deals to keep doing them.. so nah it's better to just not promote them at all. It doesn't make the creator look good, and it leads gullible viewers to make a poor decision. Nobody wins, other than the scammer.

    • @JTL1776
      @JTL1776 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      American Air defense has proved itself time and time again.
      The sheer capacity of naval air defense and the systems across East Asia let alone the Increase of air defense systems accross allies near Chinese borders.
      Taiwan might not get obliterated.

  • @weimorefun
    @weimorefun 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5877

    Taiwanese here! When I was a conscript in the Taiwanese Army 10 years ago my officer used to tell us about this plan, But we will never do this unless it's absolutely necessary !!! I wish peace upon Taiwan, China and the rest of the world~

    • @markc6140
      @markc6140 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Should Taiwan take this heinous step, Taiwan leaders will be annihilated totally without hesitation.

    • @ronzac55
      @ronzac55 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +355

      i really hope China and Taiwan won't destroy each other, because it would be a lose lose. especially for the people of both countries.

    • @andreilazar2800
      @andreilazar2800 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

      China is well aware of this treat and would let the Dam drain out before the Invasion

    • @andreilazar2800
      @andreilazar2800 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +170

      ​@@ronzac55If China will let the Dam drain out before the Invasion it would only destroy a the electric Energy suply wich the destruction of the Dam would Not cause signifikant Problems in electric Energy suply

    • @mickelodiansurname9578
      @mickelodiansurname9578 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Taiwan might not do so unless absolutely necessary, But if they get involved, and they would have no choice but to do so, then the US would do it BEFORE they do anything else! Why? Well it also stops China using their nuclear deterrence.

  • @NonInflatable
    @NonInflatable 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1111

    Masterworks is very dangerous. Owning a fragment of an artwork which is wholly owned by an unregulated, unlisted company is the ultimate madness.

    • @strivism
      @strivism 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

      Oh yeah, it stinks of taking advantage of the average person. I have no doubt it'll be an expose in a year or two.

    • @dellisbeaver8666
      @dellisbeaver8666 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +184

      I was a little disappointed to see this channel promoting them. It reeks of scam.

    • @dongpan8931
      @dongpan8931 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      日本政府昨天召开会议宣布,2023年8月24号开始向海洋排放福岛核污染水,持续30年。日本首相岸田文雄在没有得到当地渔民和中国等周边国家的支持下,表示要快速的启动核污染水排海。截止目前居然没在国外媒体上看见有一个主流媒体报道的!真是狗脸啊!盐从哪来,海鲜,海带从哪来? 0:38

    • @potatoskunk5981
      @potatoskunk5981 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      The Plain Bagel has a good video on it.

    • @Omegawerewolfx
      @Omegawerewolfx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's always been a scheme to draw in people who do not do their research.

  • @sw1vel-kid536
    @sw1vel-kid536 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    I’m glad I could find this 14 min video with over million views talking about Taiwan’a biggest SECRET

    • @nyanyamero
      @nyanyamero 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It's not really a "secret" that you think, it's more of a threat or a warning to china. Porcupine strategy is what Taiwan has been doing for decades now.

    • @BV-fr8bf
      @BV-fr8bf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The USAF likely has a similar strategy!

    • @hkfoo3333
      @hkfoo3333 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      it is all bs.

  • @canolathra6865
    @canolathra6865 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    I feel like a lot of people are forgetting just how strong large amounts of water are. All you need to do is create a crack that allows a dozen gallons per second through, and within a day the entire dam would be destroyed by the force of the flowing water.

    • @alexdrockhound9497
      @alexdrockhound9497 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      yep. the scouring effects of high pressure water are pretty incredible. If they made a few meter size hole below the water line, the water pressure could eat away the dam down to the river bed.
      But if china was about to attack taiwan, they would likely empty a lot of water out of the dam.

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How much you know, upon the building of the dam, this issue was not noted and prepare for. Like the Great Wall, it is meant to last a thousand years. Please note the many public project in China history lasted more then a thousand years. After a Nuke, who care for it will be the end of all mankind for CCP have thousand Nuke for U.S.A. alone.

    • @brianpeck4035
      @brianpeck4035 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah and comparing a leak to releasing water through sluices is unreasonable because of the erosive effects of a large leak.

    • @lixzx007
      @lixzx007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But compared with China's nuclear retaliation. It will be nothing

    • @Alias1983
      @Alias1983 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It would give important people more time to flee. Best case scenario is to blow it wide open in one shot.

  • @Hobbit_1023
    @Hobbit_1023 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1576

    “And while people are not into politics, people are into survival…and when it comes to survival, nothing is contemptible.”
    …well said!

    • @wuhaninstituteofvirology
      @wuhaninstituteofvirology 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      & when it comes to survival, mutually ensured destruction is the opposite of that

    • @khaldrago911
      @khaldrago911 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      How secret is that plan if it’s on TH-cam now?

    • @Peichen01
      @Peichen01 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stop treading his exotic wisdom quote as some old adage. That quote is illogical as it equates not having national sovereignty to death and that’s clearly not the case.
      Beijing isn’t out to kill Taiwanese so if the choice is fight to the last Taiwanese for NATO or surrender and go home to family, the choice is obvious

    • @Ar1AnX1x
      @Ar1AnX1x 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Shirvan Tzu

    • @justindion4394
      @justindion4394 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      He has some of the best quips.

  • @ryanchris1048
    @ryanchris1048 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +826

    War is not determined by who is right, but who is left. Very profound indeed.

    • @steampunk888
      @steampunk888 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      You’re misquoting it. Listen again.

    • @stardustandflames126
      @stardustandflames126 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Is it though? It's a pretty goofy pun

    • @CthonicSoulChicken
      @CthonicSoulChicken 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Shirvan was full of bangers in this one.

    • @STFUGOOGLE420
      @STFUGOOGLE420 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      This is an old ass quote and not to mention cringy and try hard. Its nothing new and definitely nothing profound

    • @red-vg2ds
      @red-vg2ds 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@STFUGOOGLE420 🤓

  • @allenaxp6259
    @allenaxp6259 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    According to a 2017 study by the RAND Corporation, a US think tank, a nuclear strike on the Three Gorges Dam would likely cause it to collapse, resulting in a catastrophic flood that would inundate much of central China. However, the study also found that a conventional strike could also cause significant damage to the dam, depending on the type of ordnance used and the location of the strike.
    For example, a bunker buster bomb could potentially penetrate the dam's thick concrete walls and damage its internal structure. However, the study found that multiple strikes would likely be required to cause the dam to collapse.

  • @unassailable6138
    @unassailable6138 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    I spoke to a Taiwanese General two years ago, and he mentioned the Three Gorges Dam is in plotted solutions of over twenty Taiwanese silos as well as Taiwanese submarines as a target. He said the salve of warheads is unstoppable as many will be fired simultaneously and at least 5 will hit it and its entourage dams.

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, and what would be the likely response?
      Wouldn't China simply flatten the entire island, killing everyone and destroying everything, and then 'invade' the empty island?
      Destroying dams to kill millions of civilians is a clear, direct violation of the Geneva Conventions, and means that the Republic of China would no longer have such protections themselves. With China having vastly more firepower, you don't think they're prepared to respond?

    • @hkfoo3333
      @hkfoo3333 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that general does not know the strength of the DAM.
      The Dam can ONLY be destroyed by a nuke . No ordinary bomb can really damage the dam.
      it is well protected and in time of war the water in the 3 gorges dam will be lowered .
      In WW2 they tried to destroy a dam and could not.

    • @onlyfacts3178
      @onlyfacts3178 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if tawian does that,,, its considered a war crime because they are deliberate targeting INNOCENT PEOPLE...

    • @Nauda999
      @Nauda999 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I didn't know Taiwanese have submarines.
      Now let's wait and see if this actually happens.

    • @Jareers-ef8hp
      @Jareers-ef8hp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yea but don’t you think that China already knows this? China has literally one of the best and most powerful air defense systems in the world and in large quantities. China can just move a bunch of those systems all around the dam and ensure that nothing will be able to penetrate it.

  • @danielmadar9938
    @danielmadar9938 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +509

    Thank you. Note that your illustration of the flood after the dam destruction is wrong, as you "flood" the whole basine. If the dam collapses, only downstream areas, lower than the reservoir might be flooded.

    • @Haxerous
      @Haxerous 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

      ​@@OK-jn4wnwhich is just deliberately deceptive

    • @Embassy_of_Jupiter
      @Embassy_of_Jupiter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      I think the animators just wanted to highlight the basin in a fancy way and because we are talking about a flood, they made it look like water.
      It was just a poor choice by the animators.
      While it certainly makes it seem so, I don't think it's meant to imply the whole basin being flooded.

    • @mrD66M
      @mrD66M 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      I think the illustration is "areas affected" rather than "areas flooded". The flood would be obviously downside of the dam, but upstream there could be water shortages.

    • @iloveprivacy8167
      @iloveprivacy8167 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Downstream, if the channel narrows, the water might rise higher than the level of the dam.
      More generally, though: exactly how much will be affected is unknown, while entire basin can be shown without difficulty. From a precautionary principle: better to say people might be affected who wouldn't be than other way 'round.

    • @youxkio
      @youxkio 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@mrD66M Yep, and ripple effects on the power grid instability.

  • @Max-pk6uc
    @Max-pk6uc 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    the info graphic feels misleading, why would blowing up the dam, flood areas upstream, I understand how downstream areas would suffer and those are the more industrial and valuable parts, but feels a tad bit misleading when you show upstream parts flooding 100's of square kilometers of land. The more realistic thing is that upstream areas would have their water level drop, a great example would be the dam explosion in Ukraine, The reservoir drained, water level upstream from the dam went down, while the areas downstream suffered. As well as the fact that this is such an important target, China would install protection around the dam, but sure, I grant that it is possible and even the mere chance of this happening is a deterant in of it self, still find the video a bit overly sensational.

    • @abdiganiaden
      @abdiganiaden 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      The graphic design work on this channel just poor.

    • @Monsterpala
      @Monsterpala 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But do they have trained dolphins like Russia defending the important Kerch bridge 😂

    • @AlphaCookies
      @AlphaCookies 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      what to say.. indian imagination is sometimes too much..

    • @Abdullahnauman245
      @Abdullahnauman245 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was going to say

    • @CaptainMisery86
      @CaptainMisery86 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I'm thinking it is showing areas effected directly by the loss of the dam. Upstream areas that lose water and downstream areas that get too much

  • @wetbobspongepants
    @wetbobspongepants 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Two rules of war:
    1. There is No such thing as Overkill.
    2. If Brute force isn't working, You're NOT using enough.

  • @LizardSpork
    @LizardSpork 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +690

    It may not be useful in preventing an invasion but it might prove useful in persuading China not to use nukes should the invasion go poorly.

    • @yurichtube1162
      @yurichtube1162 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China doesn't need to invade. It can shut down Taiwan's economy within a week, and cut them off from the rest of the world

    • @eduwino151
      @eduwino151 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Taiwan can use the threat of rockets with dirty bombs hitting Chinese cities to deter an foolishness

    • @user-op8fg3ny3j
      @user-op8fg3ny3j 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Yeah, war crimes are very persuasive

    • @centrist3684
      @centrist3684 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So many reasons why this is a bad take. 1) China has a no first use policy on nukes 2) You don't need nukes to obliterated Taiwan, remember how the USA fire bombed Tokyo? We got better ones these days 3) A complete naval blockade would cripple the economy, where China can just shoot cargo ships and prevent export import 4) Invasion of Taiwan was never about destroying them, from reuniting them like East and West Germany
      Bottom line is, this "secret plan" would never work because it would never escalate to this level of hatred AND there's way better ways to cripple Taiwan. China will most likely just take a chapter from US's book with "economic sanctions" enforced by the military.

    • @thoughttransmitter5555
      @thoughttransmitter5555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

      Stopping war through thought (i.e deterrence) isn’t a war crime. And in any case: If China were to use nuclear weapons against Taiwan they would already be guilty of such evil, that any retaliation would be far more karma, than evil (no matter how evil it would be).

  • @jonah9905
    @jonah9905 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +198

    if it was secret we wouldnt know about it

    • @morphkogan8627
      @morphkogan8627 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

      literally lol. Already read about this being a possible strategy like 2 years ago. Im sure China is well aware

    • @HolyXerxes
      @HolyXerxes 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Yeah, I love this channel so much but I hate when he need to put bait title like that, if its a secret then you wont be talking about it. Only reason you talking about it because is already make public.

    • @bolsa3136
      @bolsa3136 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Thats the point. Its deterrance. Like saying you have nukes.

    • @jonah9905
      @jonah9905 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@bolsa3136 yep, the plan would be worthless if it was secret

    • @rodrigopaim82
      @rodrigopaim82 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Secret can be just non official. Like the "secret" atomic weapons that Israel has

  • @chrislee9166
    @chrislee9166 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    It's never a secret both to China and Taiwan, I lived in China when I was a kid and I heard of that when I was 8 or 9. The dam is far from TW, India or every direction it may be attacked, and it's huge which makes it difficult to collapse. Also it won't be a huge disaster if it collapse, cuz there still are several huge dams on Yangtze river, which ranks themselves NO.4 NO.6 and No.8 worldwide which will reduce the harm. Besides, even if it been destroyed, it won't be a mutual destruction, I mean, several cities like Wuhan and Nanjing will be destroyed but most part in China will be safe, but it will result in nuclear attacks towards Taiwan immediatly. I don‘t think it's a good idea for TW to do that.

    • @jpb2366
      @jpb2366 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      If you are fighting for survival all gloves are off…

    • @dane5692
      @dane5692 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      estimated 40 million deaths at minimum, China loses any chance of getting those factories. Taiwan may not win, but neither does China.

    • @paladinzzy
      @paladinzzy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree. Why are they making such a big fuzz about the collapse of the dam? During normal days, even if the dam collapses due to any reason, it won't make as much damage as a large scale flood like the one happened in 1998. And Yangtze river has frequent floods during the monsoon season.
      The power of the dam has been over-exaggerated by this video.

    • @Hey1234Hey
      @Hey1234Hey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If one dam collapses the other dams won't be able to handle the massive tsunami that will follow after the massive potential energy in the water from the first dam that collapses is released. And with every dam that gets struck by such a colossal tsunami and collapses, the potential energy gets recharged because all the dams do, is hold more potential energy. Like a domino effect. More dams makes it worse, not better. In fact less dams means no more recharge of potential energy and the tsunami will expend faster the more distance it will travel. All the likes in your comment is genuine cope and lack of understanding.

    • @chrislee9166
      @chrislee9166 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Hey1234Hey Maybe you should learn how a gravity dam works at first. Those dams are located on the upstream of this one firstly and second, a gravity dam collapsing has far less effect than you think, unlike an arch dam.

  • @gmwpphs1899
    @gmwpphs1899 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    I'm a Chinese-American, a citizen of the United States of course, but I have families back in China, and it'd hurt me both physically and mentally to see my families being wiped out while not offending the political sides of each country... I'm in a extremely tough spot right now. I really do hope this war would never break out, best wishes for peace.

    • @Lobos222
      @Lobos222 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These types of doctrines are put forward and indirectly leaked to prevent, in this case, China seriously considering strategic bombing of Taiwan or even an invasion.

    • @mathish1477
      @mathish1477 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I hope you never have to pick a side. At least being an American, you are free to pick!

    • @r2com641
      @r2com641 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@mathish1477America? Free? Lmao

    • @Mshi-
      @Mshi- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@r2om641 much freer than Maoist China

    • @djwheels6615
      @djwheels6615 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The entire world should hope this war doesn’t break out. There will not be another war. But our hopes are very likely to be in vain. Nuclear war is inevitable. Two superpowers constantly growing/racing to outpace the other both needing the same resources with conflicting interests it’s almost laughable to even consider any other outcomes. It’s a vicious cycle neither country can stop for fear of the other gaining advantage. Humanity as a whole lost when America let another country become a nuclear threat. So because of compassion and sympathy it’s wrong to invade other countries to prevent this and because of compassion and sympathy we have allowed countries to “literally” catch up to the point the entire planet WILL have a nuclear extinction. Compassion and sympathy the demise of humanity.

  • @HumanAction76
    @HumanAction76 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +483

    It would be insane to believe China doesn't have the air space between Taiwan and the dam protected.

    • @user-gc1hg9sp9k
      @user-gc1hg9sp9k 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +188

      And blowing up a dam are consider a huge war crime becauss most of the casualties are civillian

    • @slomo4672
      @slomo4672 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

      It's surely protected. But how good is that protection?

    • @joaomartins8758
      @joaomartins8758 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

      Taiwan could never reach that damn in a million years.

    • @FRIPPE_THE_GREAT
      @FRIPPE_THE_GREAT 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +160

      I'm quite sure the would reach the dam. Just ask Russia about the drones that hit downtown Moscow yesterday. And the drones are not sophisticated; damaging the dam enough is another thing.

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

      @@FRIPPE_THE_GREAT You might want to look up the distance involved.

  • @dennisenright9347
    @dennisenright9347 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +733

    Might the weaponization of a water reservoir apply in the dispute between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Blue Nile? Filling the reservoir behind the dam as quickly as possible might make the GERD impossible to destroy as the catastrophic release of the full reservoir could overwhelm downstream dams like Aswan and cause floods as far away as Cairo and the Nile delta

    • @anitagorse9204
      @anitagorse9204 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      Yes. If Egypt plans a move it will come soon.

    • @soothinglycool9806
      @soothinglycool9806 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Urgency to counter and conquer desalination is immense. Not doing so guarantees war across the globe.

    • @jimdoe9827
      @jimdoe9827 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      Filling the GERD asap is an existential threat for downstream countries, exactly for the reason that it would cause multi-year droughts.

    • @drbuckley1
      @drbuckley1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Water is at the core of a great many international conflicts today.

    • @anitagorse9204
      @anitagorse9204 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      @@drbuckley1 And of many more future conflicts. This time it won't be about gold and oil, but food and water. This is how far we came as a species...

  • @Cannon500
    @Cannon500 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Although this plan seems plausible, it is not very practical. The main problem is that the long range cruise missile Taiwan has lacks the payload to deliver a knockout blow. If we look at the Ukraine war, we can see both sides needs at least multiple cruise missile hits on major infrastructure targets to even cause a small amount of damage. The other problem is getting the missiles to their destination and hit the target. China has Taiwan under 24/7 surveillance through their spy satellites, listening positions, and radars, so any major cruise missile launch will be immediately detected by the Chinese military. The missiles will then need to travel all way to the dam through layers and layers of Chinese missile defenses, interceptors, and jamming. Cruise missiles does not have a 100% hit rate even under perfect conditions, so you need at least a handful of missiles to reach its destinations and bypass all the defenses to even have a chance. The chances of a successful missile strike on the Three Gorges Dam is too low unless you are able to achieve air dominance over mainland China.

    • @SerfinBird
      @SerfinBird 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You don't need air dominance. Drones in Ukraine get through both sides defenses and misses from both get through both's defenses. With enough missiles it would make it through. Chinese military assets have routinely been worse than both western and Russian assets. There is no reason to think that their air defense systems would be any different.

    • @dominusdone5023
      @dominusdone5023 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      russias air defense system is kinda ehh tho@@SerfinBird

    • @ashvandal5697
      @ashvandal5697 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People were saying this about Russia and Russia has had several embarrassing strikes in its actual territory. Russian air defense tech isn’t actually very good. And China mostly copies them, and literally all of their tech is untested and unproven in combat.

  • @EovarEndre
    @EovarEndre 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cixin Liu be like: the deterrence era has begun

  • @Moribus_Artibus
    @Moribus_Artibus 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +106

    I don't always watch CaspianReport, but when I do it's for Shirvan's one liners.

    • @user-gs8jv4oq6w
      @user-gs8jv4oq6w 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think he is overdoing it… a bit cringey

  • @kzsposeidon3121
    @kzsposeidon3121 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +895

    The dam is between 40m (131ft) and 115m (377ft) thick. Would be really interesting to know, how much (and what kind of) ordonance would be required to catastrophically damage it.
    You'd have to damage the lower, eg thicker, parts to collapse it. Even regarding some pre-existing cracks and rooms inside the dam, 70-80m (250ft) of reinforced concrete is a lot, bunker buster or not

    • @Iamthestig42069
      @Iamthestig42069 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +122

      Dozens of bunker busters around the dam, causing a localized earthquake? Since it’s on water I’d bet the ground around it has a ton of water in it. Use the bombs to create liquefaction?

    • @harsectinal
      @harsectinal 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +283

      Reinforced by tofu isn't the same as rebar.

    • @henriconfucius5559
      @henriconfucius5559 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

      It doesnt need to be completely destroyed, it just needs enough structural damage in the centre of pressure to cause catastrophic failure. Thinking in equivalent concrete thickness, that would mean destroying a bit more than the margin of safety they projected the dam with. Even if its just 1/5 of the thickness, still a lot of concrete lmao
      And it would need to be done more than 3 times. Either the best saboteours in the world, a huge swarm of supersonic missiles, or some hypersonic missiles.

    • @nadine2185
      @nadine2185 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

      just need a little bit of damage, and the water pressure will do the rest..

    • @Verrisin
      @Verrisin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

      considering the concerns about the concrete quality ... it might not need much.

  • @Thomas-xd4cx
    @Thomas-xd4cx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    You know it's really not so secret when you tell everyone about it

    • @Love2Cruise
      @Love2Cruise 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It’s a MAD threat. Of course it needs to be known, at least to the pertinent parties.

    • @AlexDrewsumin
      @AlexDrewsumin หลายเดือนก่อน

      They want people to know. For two reasons, as a detorent and so if it does ever happen the people in China will know their government was warned.

  • @AlanTheBest97
    @AlanTheBest97 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I am an engineer and have worked on dams before. I dont think a missile strike could destroy 3 gorges. It would probably not be enough to cause a flood, 3 gorges is so huge, it would need a lot of enormous missiles, I dont know if such a thing even exists outside the relm of nuclear weapons.

    • @Ghostrider7132t
      @Ghostrider7132t 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well you are right about that point and Taiwan alone may not be able to destroy such a dam. However, other countries can. Especially the US who successfully used dam-buster bombs in the past. 😅

    • @belldrop7365
      @belldrop7365 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, the thing is, it's made in china. Chances are, it'll break by itself.

    • @alexshawcn
      @alexshawcn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and why would US do that, to a country that can also destroy part of US? The fact that unclear powerhouses don't fight each other directly is because of the nukes@@Ghostrider7132t

    • @unassailable6138
      @unassailable6138 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol,that's what they used to say about the Twin Towers. Newer missile technology can tear reinforced concrete like paper.

    • @comradesillyotter1537
      @comradesillyotter1537 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@unassailable6138this isn't really true

  • @maaamuuu6232
    @maaamuuu6232 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    China has long said that attacking the Three Gorges Dam is considered a nuclear strike and will take any measures to counter it

    • @Mycatsbirthdayparty
      @Mycatsbirthdayparty 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree with them, it's akin to attacking civilians and should be treated as such

  • @hydra70
    @hydra70 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +241

    There is another problem with this plan that makes it extremely dangerous for Taiwan. Mutually Assured Destruction depends on a capability to hit back at an enemy that initiates a nuclear first strike against you. If the PRC can prevent an attack like this with a nuclear first strike against Taiwan, then Taiwan either needs the ability to launch an attack on the dam with just a few minutes notice, or they need the ability to launch such an attack even after a nuclear strike from the PRC. Otherwise the PRC is heavily incentivized to go nuclear if they think there is even the slightest chance that Taiwan is about to attack the dam.

    • @slomo4672
      @slomo4672 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China repeatedly states that it will not be the first to use nuclear weapons.

    • @justinbarker4813
      @justinbarker4813 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think if China were to go preemtively nuclear, it would completely shut them off from the West and many other regions of the world indefinitely such that they would still cause themselves catastrophic damage. China I would believe is thinking of a way to do an attack where countries will slowly return to do business with them over a decade or so. I think going full nuclear will seal them of the same as North Korea

    • @simpleandawesomeanime3220
      @simpleandawesomeanime3220 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

      The PRC doing a nuclear first-strike against taiwan would literally be opening Pandora's Box and heighten tensions in the Pacific to dangerous levels.

    • @12vscience
      @12vscience 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Taiwan or an ally could also prevent oil tankers from reaching China through the straights.

    • @caralho5237
      @caralho5237 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China doesnt want to destroy Taiwan. Taiwan is like a treasure chest to them. They wanna take it over

  • @socket_error1000
    @socket_error1000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +318

    During WW2 the allies had several failed bombing attempts to take out dams that were critical to the German war effort. Until they developed dam-buster bombs that would skip along the surface of the reservoir right up to the wall of the dam after being dropped by low flying planes. The bombs, more like reinforced barrels, would then sink down behind the wall of the dam and explode at depth, putting maximum pressure on the dam at the lowest point. This allowed all the pressure of the water to help work with the force of the explosion. This was very effective and they blew up several dams key to the German war effort. The damage was so severe to civilians downriver, taking out entire villages, that in the aftermath it was decided that this type of warfare should be outlawed and made a war crime. Back then bombing and other types of warfare was so inaccurate that killing civilians anywhere near the target area was just considered part of war. Unlike today when we are outraged when a bomb or missile goes astray in a warzone by even 100' and hits a civilian structure.

    • @bobjacobson858
      @bobjacobson858 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      However, is "outrage" really a deterrent? It may simply cause politicians to wring their hands, with no real consequences beyond that.

    • @socket_error1000
      @socket_error1000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@bobjacobson858 Such an act would be seen as a terrorist act and result in most nations turning their backs on the attacker.
      If Taiwan did this and killed the number of people that even the lowest estimates claim are at risk, it would be one of the worst deliberate acts of mass murder since 1938, the last time they deliberately flooded the Yellow river in an effort to try and stop the Japanese advance, killing some 90k of their own people outright and 300k-500k from famine and disease in the months that followed.
      Even the USA and its allies in the region would have to find a way to secure Taiwan and unseat the current government after such an action or let them fall to the CCP and lose control of shipping trade in the region.

    • @lancetheking7524
      @lancetheking7524 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@socket_error1000 however, I have a feeling this plan will never be inacted until something like literally dropping nuclear bombs upon Taiwan, which knowing China wants an alive Taiwan, I doubt

    • @inigomontoya3750
      @inigomontoya3750 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Old school mentality

    • @lancetheking7524
      @lancetheking7524 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@inigomontoya3750 then become part of the dead statistics my friend

  • @teegloo
    @teegloo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That’s alarming. Human life means less and less with each passing day

  • @DerekCoveart-dk8iz
    @DerekCoveart-dk8iz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Taiwan is internationally recognized as a Chinese province.

  • @EarlofSalop
    @EarlofSalop 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +203

    I spent 6 months teaching in Xiaogan and met a member of the PLA airborne division. He was an NCO and still had never jumped out of a plane. He and his colleagues would pay their major so they never had to turn up. He sold hashish to do this.
    China is wild.

    • @petergilkes7082
      @petergilkes7082 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      A good story. Story!

    • @whocare3704
      @whocare3704 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As wild as your mother, liar

    • @xinggao-to5cp
      @xinggao-to5cp 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      A story which is insane,It goes without saying that not everyone should serve in the military in mainland China,if that NCO is truth why would he/she serve for the military if he is that rich to pay their major. If that NCO is a nepo baby why he only got a NCO? Those nepo baby will go to Military College and became lieutenant at the day graduate and get the bachelor degree😂😂😂How stupid the story is

    • @bodazephyr6629
      @bodazephyr6629 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      yeh, the PLA is a paper tiger. They failed to take Hanoi in 1979 and that was against Vietnamese support troops and militias. The best Vietnamese troops were in Cambodia at the time, and still the Chinese couldn't win.

    • @petergilkes7082
      @petergilkes7082 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bodazephyr6629 They didn't even try.

  • @Dhdh365
    @Dhdh365 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +223

    If the US had let Taiwan complete its nuclear deterrence program decades ago, it might have prevented the threat of invasion and world war we face today.

    • @eduwino151
      @eduwino151 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      am pretty sure Taiwan has missiles loaded with dirty bombs specifically to turn Chinese cities into radiocative wastelands

    • @tadhgcronin175
      @tadhgcronin175 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are quite right. Every country should have them. Screw health care and housing, let's get nukes.

    • @FukUparacohpta73
      @FukUparacohpta73 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never heard of China invading other countries. The EEUU on the other hand.....

    • @user-op8fg3ny3j
      @user-op8fg3ny3j 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      3 shadow reply

    • @yankeegohome5154
      @yankeegohome5154 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      And if the USA didn't exist in the first place we had world p.... never mind.

  • @edsacks
    @edsacks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The water is a problem for the mainland now The Drinking water is so polluted. The mainland is in bad shape!!

  • @benjaminbio5834
    @benjaminbio5834 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Go for it brother, scare the Dragon too.

  • @bencopeland3560
    @bencopeland3560 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

    If it’s a Mutually Assured Destruction strategy, then isn’t it important that it not be a “Secret Plan”?

    • @airking2883
      @airking2883 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ​@@michachochulski6015that's what OP is saying

    • @STFUGOOGLE420
      @STFUGOOGLE420 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@airking2883not in the vid title though, he is clickbaiting by calling ir secret

    • @EdMcF1
      @EdMcF1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      The mode of delivery would be kept secret, the prospect should be self-evident. Red China will have considered its own vulnerabilities and it would have occurred to them anyway. The Dambusters was not just a film, Barnes Wallis's Upkeeps lit the fuze, as it were.

    • @mickelodiansurname9578
      @mickelodiansurname9578 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only secret to you and me... not secret to the CCP and Taiwan and the US! They are very well aware what the weak points are!

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@EdMcF1 there are only so many ways to transport hundreds of tons of explosives to a target. Taiwan has neither the heavy bombers or the missiles capable of lobbing that much mass.

  • @andytaylor5282
    @andytaylor5282 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    Just an o'l Navy man's opinion, but those shipping locks look like a juicy target that would be economically devastating but not a cataclysmic as busting the dam, making it a lot harder for China to justify turning the island into a radio active parking lot. And the shipping locks are a lot softer than the dam it's self!

    • @johnpage7491
      @johnpage7491 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      An excellent tempered response scenario. This leaves the total destruction of the dam as a continued deterrent. "o'l navy man with a plan"!! Good job sailor!

    • @JoeSmith-bf5tp
      @JoeSmith-bf5tp 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Take China out. No one cares about those people

    • @g.williams2047
      @g.williams2047 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Very good idea. Also puts a lot of pressure on the CCP, knowing that "we already got through once, and we can do it again if we want to"

    • @j.c.4192
      @j.c.4192 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No such thing.
      Any response would devastate Taiwan if there is any attack on the mainland infrastructure.
      The simple fact that Taiwan imports 98% of energy needs to two ports is the crux and minimal damage to bring Taiwan to its knees. Taiwan will not be able to function at all. As 68% of its food is imported as well.

  • @edsacks
    @edsacks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Flooding is so great because there isn't proper drainage. Poor build construction!!

  • @andrewfuzh
    @andrewfuzh 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Any attack on three gorges dam would be retaliated with nuclear bomb. Not sure any country would want to test it out.

  • @Arayamk
    @Arayamk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    This would be the most stupid plan, making a nuclear capable country desperate and irrational has not ended well historically.

    • @brianwhedon8442
      @brianwhedon8442 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's why its a Mutually Assured Destruction plan.
      If Taiwan knows they're doomed, they take China with them.
      This is the same plan Israel has. Google "the Sampson Option"

    • @jonjeskie5234
      @jonjeskie5234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      When has it ever truly been done? Nukes have only ever been used once, and that country wasn't erratic.

    • @Arayamk
      @Arayamk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jonjeskie5234Do you think it’s rational to nuke 200 thousand civilians to dust and 1 million more later for attacking a genuine military target?

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jonjeskie5234 JFK is praised for threatening to destroy the USSR if there was a attack from Cuba. Now people are cheering or even collaborating with Taiwanese separatists to target Chinese soil.

    • @bluegregory6239
      @bluegregory6239 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is your basis for that statement? Nuclear weapons have only been used twice in wartime, by the USA, a nation that was already winning and which, compared to Japan, was neither irrational nor desperate.

  • @nathansamuelson
    @nathansamuelson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +435

    The problem with dams, especially large ones, is that they aren't uniformly thick. They typically widen to a foot at the base and contain rooms for workers and turbines. Could you knock out it's ability to produce power? Yes, easily. Turn it into an on demand tsunami? You'd likely need a nuke, a powerful kinetic weapon, or a lot of bunker busters.

    • @benjaminbatema6963
      @benjaminbatema6963 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Or a water hammer.

    • @shadesmarerik4112
      @shadesmarerik4112 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      Given that something like that happened already without nukes on the yellow river: no.. u dont need nukes to break a dam.

    • @degreeskelvin3025
      @degreeskelvin3025 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      Remember that the entire dam doesn't need to break for the water to break through. You just need to break SOME of it

    • @streetrider2487
      @streetrider2487 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      @@degreeskelvin3025 Once a crack appears, the massive volume n mass of water will do the rest. Think of the Titan sub..... hahaha

    • @itnotmeitu3896
      @itnotmeitu3896 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not to mention if war broke out the Chinese would fortify the ever living fuck out of it with countless anti missile systems

  • @MrStevenAttila
    @MrStevenAttila 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is not a secret if it is shown in public! What we see here, Chinese are also seeing that lol! It is not possible for Taiwan to attack the 3 Gorges Dam, because it is deep in the country.

  • @baahcusegamer4530
    @baahcusegamer4530 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    No one ever has a good day making an amphibious assault against a well-prepared enemy. China hopefully has someone at the top reminding the others that “one does not simply walk into Mordor” and Taiwan is very much Mordor in this scenario.

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China isn't invading Taiwan. Not until their economy calms down.

    • @JackHawkinswrites
      @JackHawkinswrites 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      A million man swim

    • @user-op8fg3ny3j
      @user-op8fg3ny3j 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That's what the Germans thought on D-Day

    • @adamdymke8004
      @adamdymke8004 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And yet it is still a military operation that is frequently necessary. Also supremacy in the air and volume of fire can cover over a multitude of sins.

    • @pakde8002
      @pakde8002 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Assuming China actually cares about it's people as individuals would be a mistake.
      The fallen soldiers families will be lucky to get a card from the CCP thanking them for the sacrifice of their family member.

  • @jonson856
    @jonson856 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +134

    One way to increase the pressure on the three gorges dam would be to destroy dams that are upstream of the river, if there are such structures, I am not sure. And then to target the three gorges dam directly.

    • @gold9994
      @gold9994 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is the same as hitting a nuclear power reactor. It's war crime anyway.

    • @cherryartist17
      @cherryartist17 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Or use the Israeli plan. Fire missiles full of paint at the dam. The paint explosions will do no damage but it will deter China by showing that Taiwan is capable of reaching the dam.

    • @Kaihegon
      @Kaihegon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I mean, if getting far enough in to hit the Three Gorges is gonna be difficult, I could only imagine trying hit a farther target. You not only have to get past the Three Gorges defense but whatever defense is at the next dam. He also said their missile range was just far enough to hit the Three Gorges, so idk if this would be possible. Might as well just throw everything at the single target cause China could just end it all in blink for taiwan with a nuke

    • @nelsonumana9547
      @nelsonumana9547 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Taiwan might not have to do this due to the fact that it was built by China😂😂😂

    • @keezy034
      @keezy034 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      CIA is that you?

  • @popolekupasupport2246
    @popolekupasupport2246 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And that ladies and gentleman is what we call a warcrime.

  • @shuaipeng602
    @shuaipeng602 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Three goeges is not a typical dam in the sense we have in the us. It was constructed like a mountain is not the design that holds back rhe water rather the weight that holds back the water. So knowing its importance i doubt any attack would go through and if it did cause a flood, the revenge would wipe the attacker off the map.

  • @isaacperry9593
    @isaacperry9593 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    Though admittedly a whole lot smaller than the 3 gorges, during WW2 the British developed a bomb which bounced across the water and was used on the dams in the Ruhr valley. This addresses the issue of dams' inherent resilience as the bombs would sink when they hit the dam wall and detonate at the base causing maximum damage.

    • @stevemercer5769
      @stevemercer5769 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The Barnes Wallis ‘bouncing bomb’ was revolutionary in its day, but it needed squadrons of bombers to directly approach the dam across the reservoir to deliver their payload. While he sinking bomb delivered exactly the right type of blast to disrupt the dam, there were significant losses among attacking aircraft, delivery now would be near impossible. Air defense improvements mean stand off attacks are now what air defenses arm, prepare and train for.
      If loss of these dams would be so catastrophic, you can bet the CCP will have massive air defences in the region. Even supersonic cruise missiles with a suitable payload would likely struggle to reach their target.

    • @brixenlang3207
      @brixenlang3207 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@stevemercer5769Ah yes, the original Star Wars/Top Gun Maverick mission

    • @killingheros3554
      @killingheros3554 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😒😒

    • @Kempi1
      @Kempi1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@stevemercer5769 Air defense is not that effective. Look at all the attacks on Moscow. There are always ways past air defense.

    • @khiem1939
      @khiem1939 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Today using missiles, there would be NO bomber loss or loss of personnel!@@stevemercer5769

  • @rejvaik00
    @rejvaik00 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    3 things for context:
    1) To understand the scope of the disaster if the 3 gorges dam ever failed;
    The entirety of the population of the United States is about 380 millon and Canada is about 30 million, meaning a death toll of 400+ million to put into perspective is like wiping every single person in the US and nearly all of that in Canada off the face of the Earth
    2) Needless destruction of civilian infrastructure is today considered a war crime;
    Civilian infrastructure such as dams can no longer be targeted by militaries unless very specific circumstances allow for it such as if the dam was being used as a base of operations in command and control for the adversary in question
    And even then a competent military commander would recognize the threat of the potential dam and be very precise in their targeting to limit the structural damage
    3) Whoever ordered the complete destruction on the dam would be the newest mass murderer in history;
    A 400 million loss of life would make the Austrian painter and the Soviet crime boss, and the Chinese communist leader be regulated to water droplets in the newest ocean of blood and the conflict from that would surpass WW2 as the deadliest conflict in the history of mankind

    • @coltrueg
      @coltrueg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Counterpoint no one cares what is and is not considered a war crime during times of war. See the dam Russia blew up Nova Kokhovka.
      Killing hundreds of millions of people who are invading your country with the goal of eradicating it is a non issue.
      Very unfortunate.

    • @theelvensong4328
      @theelvensong4328 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Of course this will be a terrible tragedy but the blame will not just fall on the one who ordered it, but also on the one who provoked it.

    • @user-sn1se8kh7z
      @user-sn1se8kh7z 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Don’t invade Taiwan.

    • @rejvaik00
      @rejvaik00 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theelvensong4328 A small yes but mostly a resounding no, it is unlawful and unpardonable to both willingly and knowingly target civilian infrastructure when conducting wartime operations
      unless the conditions for targeting are astoundingly proven to have turned that civilian target into a military one
      China will definitely be at fault as an instigator for the hypothetical Sino - Taiwanese conflict, but if Taiwan did respond in kind and was successful in utilizing this plan then the condemnation would flip back on to themselves
      Something Taiwan is aware of, and that's why they use it as a means of deterrence
      Luckily for the rest of the world and all supporters of Taiwan, such as myself,
      it serves it's purpose best by acting as a deterrent, and it is a very _VERY_ good deterrent that allows Taiwan to smugly say to a nation 50 times it's size:
      *"Hey you CCP fks! We don't even need nukes and yet we can STILL retaliate and end more of ya than you can do to us!"*
      And it does it's job amazingly well because it infuriates the CCP to no end that a weakness they have is so easily known and bragged about
      And anything that infuriates the CCP is a good thing

    • @rejvaik00
      @rejvaik00 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-sn1se8kh7z I don't think China will ever invade Taiwan I think the China and by extension the CCP are very much cowards and they only would ever fight when they are 100% sure they can win
      So when they can't they just do posturing, those grey zone tactics, and puff up their chests to make them seem bigger than they really are

  • @Vichitragupta823-xm9iq
    @Vichitragupta823-xm9iq หลายเดือนก่อน

    You need to consider these two things.
    1.Taiwan has US and its ally Israel support. It gives a special edge in weapons and also VETO power in UN.
    2. China can empty dams but what about nuclear reactors ?

  • @winstonsmiths2449
    @winstonsmiths2449 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also, what are the odds that the damn has hidden structural flaws, water seepage, geological deformation around the dam?

  • @Medicine91
    @Medicine91 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    That's a dam good plan.

    • @vee-bee-a
      @vee-bee-a 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Finally, some-one said it. 😂

    • @joemaloney1019
      @joemaloney1019 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Damn you beat me to it!

    • @Reachland02
      @Reachland02 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      While it’s a dam good plan for war it’s also a dam worst idea for humanity too 😂

    • @joemaloney1019
      @joemaloney1019 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Reachland02 Go on don't hold anything back!

    • @relaxingtrip4224
      @relaxingtrip4224 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@Reachland02war doesn't determine who is right,but who is left...

  • @wayfarer1844
    @wayfarer1844 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    “Ultimately some actions might be worse than a crime, they might be a mistake “ - these little sayings of geopolitical wisdom are always my favorite part of the videos!
    After the analysis of course!

    • @dongpan8931
      @dongpan8931 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      日本政府昨天召开会议宣布,2023年8月24号开始向海洋排放福岛核污染水,持续30年。日本首相岸田文雄在没有得到当地渔民和中国等周边国家的支持下,表示要快速的启动核污染水排海。截止目前居然没在国外媒体上看见有一个主流媒体报道的!真是狗脸啊!盐从哪来,海鲜,海带从哪来?

    • @pjdj
      @pjdj 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I found this comment the exact moment he said that.

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Better one, China’s Century of Humiliation. Will not see another, no more.

    • @wenharn
      @wenharn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My favorite part of the video, on the other hand, is - "When it comes to survival, nothing is contemptable."

    • @onlyfacts3178
      @onlyfacts3178 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if tawian does that,,, its considered a war crime because they are deliberate targeting INNOCENT PEOPLE...

  • @TosoToco
    @TosoToco 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If the dam ever collapses it will be because of Chinese incompetence and lack of maintenance. Taiwan would never do something like this.

  • @ezekielteklaking
    @ezekielteklaking 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "War does not determine who is right only who is left" great quotes from Bertrand Russell.

    • @VunderGuy
      @VunderGuy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bertrand Russel has no great quotes, so your comment is invalid.

    • @ezekielteklaking
      @ezekielteklaking 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have no idea who Bertrand Russel is, and make no claim to value of his quotes. I'm noting who said the quote as its custom in citing someone's else's idea or words when you use them. I think that's a valid point. @@VunderGuy

  • @matusknives
    @matusknives 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    The dam is deep into the mainland, will be well protected with AD and would take large amount of precision strikes to damage (look at the Kakhovka dam that had to be mined to be destroyed), so it sounds like daydreaming. Even if such an attack would succeed it would have little relevance to a military conflict, but would mean huge civilian losses - something that would greatly undermine any western support in such a conflict. But that does not seem to bother the author of this article. But promoting what is basically a Ponzi scheme based on artworks seems to be perfectly good idea. Apparently even 1.3M subscribers is not enough.

    • @chrisx5127
      @chrisx5127 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Considering that Southern China used to belong to Vietnam...

    • @likevin3087
      @likevin3087 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@chrisx5127 Considering that North Vietnam used to belong to China,That's the real history!See evolution of Vietnamese script.

    • @bradgaines5091
      @bradgaines5091 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The idea here is that the attack on the dam would be carried out if Taiwan was about to cease to exist. So losing support wouldn't matter, as they'd no longer be in a position to use it.
      It's like a fighter throwing one last punch in the face before passing out. They're not going to win. They just want to get one last shot before they go down, and make it hurt.

    • @user-vs7jm2bo8b
      @user-vs7jm2bo8b 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bradgaines5091天真的想法,凭什么觉得共产党会蠢到连台湾最后一击都防不住,如果真是如此,解放军也不必将美军当做假想敌,不如早点投降算了

    • @cemdursun
      @cemdursun 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is deemed as a last resort if an attack on Taiwan is imminent, until that it's a deterrence. Civilian losses in Taiwan vs Civilian loses in Taiwan.
      Furthermore, you would be surprised how much more Western support would arise in such a conflict since it'd mark the start of World War III.

  • @thedownwardmachine
    @thedownwardmachine 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    A deterrent only works if you tell people about it, otherwise there's no point in having it.
    The Soviets did something similar in the '80s (see the book The Dead Hand) with the intent of dissuading the USA from attempting a swift decapitation strike. But because the Soviets were so paranoid, they kept it a secret. Yes this was the plot of Dr. Strangelove and yet somehow they made the same mistake two decades after the movie came out.

    • @bobcastro9386
      @bobcastro9386 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Doctor Strangelove; "But the whole point of the Doomsday Machine is lost if you keep it a secret... Why didn't you tell the world, eh?" Soviet Ambassador Alexi de Sadesky; "It was to be announced at the Party Congress on Monday. As you know, our premiere loves surprises."

    • @Lolophobia
      @Lolophobia 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Seriously the best movie ever

    • @impossible7386
      @impossible7386 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except it’s a ruse. It is a fake the same way many of Russia’s supposed capabilities turned out fraudulent. Think about it. If you just say you have it they will believe you.

    • @chamonix4658
      @chamonix4658 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What about the Israel and its nuclear weapons? They still deny having them but it clearly works as a deterrent

    • @WJV9
      @WJV9 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Lolophobia - A 'tour de force' from actor Peter Sellers who played 3 major characters in the movie. I also enjoyed George C. Scott's performance as the head of the air force.

  • @brentlackey5787
    @brentlackey5787 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wouldn't that be like the largest scale war crime ever committed?

  • @successfullguy
    @successfullguy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    A catastrophic dam faliour flooding downstream would make the make covid lockdown supply chain issues look like a walk in the park

  • @ibizilong8907
    @ibizilong8907 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    “And while people are not into politics, people are into survival…and when it comes to survival, nothing is contemptible.”
    I Love how seamlessly Shirvan integrates adds in his videos. BRAVO !!!

    • @mickelodiansurname9578
      @mickelodiansurname9578 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      In this case an ad for a company selling 'shares' (although not covered by the SEC) in things they don't actually own.

    • @baiwuli6781
      @baiwuli6781 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      " ... and survival has nothing to do with China-Taiwan reunification"

  • @ianshaver8954
    @ianshaver8954 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We’ve had bombs designed specifically to take out dams since WW2. Taiwan is more than technologically advanced enough to make one and put it on a high precision cruise missile.

  • @user-bf1md8xv1p
    @user-bf1md8xv1p 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MAD in CCP China against MAD in Tiawan. Brilliant! Who wants to go first?

  • @captmorgan3515
    @captmorgan3515 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Finally a video that mentioned the 1938 yellow river flood! It’s impossible to find a video about on TH-cam. And it’s so relevant to recent events and so deadly!

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      American puppet regimes really like blowing up dams.

    • @DZ477
      @DZ477 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You could literally just search the topic up.
      You will learn nothing if you just wait for things to be recommended to you.

  • @anashajmohamad8709
    @anashajmohamad8709 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This would be a war crime

    • @ilbjork
      @ilbjork 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is rightful defense for Taiwan.

    • @anashajmohamad8709
      @anashajmohamad8709 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ilbjork a crime is a crime, and the world cant be better if we can justify the crimes.

    • @ephraimboateng5239
      @ephraimboateng5239 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Possibly the biggest one in history, far surpassing the holocaust, holodomor and the countless US war crimes

    • @ilbjork
      @ilbjork 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If it could prevent invasion, it would be a great plan. Less people would die from war initiated by a dictator.

    • @davidyu3815
      @davidyu3815 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ilbjork And then Chinese nukes will sterilize the island of Taiwan then if that happens. That's the rightful defense of China. Oh, and America is not off the hook if they tried anything funny. Chinese and Russian nukes are aimed at the Calderas of America's Yellowstone Supervolcano.
      Eruption of the Yellowstone Supervolcano and it's 600x (Six hundred times) more powerful than ALL the nuclear weapons ever detonated since 1945 by ALL nations on earth as calculated by the American University of California. The eruption will make America's ENTIRE nuclear arsenal and the breaching of the three gorges dam.........look like child's play.

  • @lilytea3
    @lilytea3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    0:00: The Three Gorges Dam is the world's largest hydropower project, supplying electricity to 20 million people and aiding flood management.
    0:34: Taiwanese military planners have suggested attacking the dam to induce mutual assured destruction.
    1:42: The consequences of such an attack would be devastating, causing widespread destruction and economic repercussions globally.
    8:33: Taiwan is boosting its military spending and doubling its annual missile production target to 497 units.
    9:00: The Xiang Xiang 2E missile has a range of 1200 kilometers, while the upgraded unfang supersonic cruise missile has an expected range of 2000 kilometers.
    9:24: The amount of firepower needed to deliver a knockout blow is uncertain, with varying opinions on the number of missiles required.
    Recap by Tammy AI

  • @timfatout5339
    @timfatout5339 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Taiwan? - If you don't think the US has nukes aimed at three gorges you are crazy.

  • @grimmWednesday
    @grimmWednesday 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Hitting Three Gorges is the most obvious move given its importance and vulnerability. I can’t imagine it’s secret to anyone who’s thought about the issue for two minutes.

    • @leontrotsky8505
      @leontrotsky8505 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The point isnt for it to be secret , but for it to be well known, especially in china, so that tiwain is capable of deterring an attack or abandonment by it's allies

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Threatening the Three Gorges is like threatening its cities directly anyway. Either way it's a total war with civilians you won't start unless you're suicidal.

    • @linphilip6389
      @linphilip6389 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You are assuming Taiwan is still alive before they can strike China. This video is silly and you are too if you believe it.

    • @elessartelcontar9415
      @elessartelcontar9415 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      In 1977, Article 56 of the Protocol I amendment to the Geneva Conventions outlawed attacks on dams "if such attack may cause the release of dangerous forces from the works or installations and consequent severe losses among the civilian population".

    • @tmog1000
      @tmog1000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @elessartelcontar9415 Yeah wonderful words if you are not being attacked

  • @breezyx976
    @breezyx976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Why would destroying the dam cause damage upstream of it? I think you might be highlighting the entire drainage basin instead of the actual affected area...

    • @iulianavasiloaia2926
      @iulianavasiloaia2926 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's called war propaganda. It doesn't need to make sense.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Simple. Terrain adjusted to immense mass of water sequestered and sudden surge of such mass (which, mind you even affected earths rotation!) would cause not only undercutting shores but also sudden relief of newly established tensions after filling the reservioir. It would affect weather patterns. This is almost 40 cubic KILOMETERS of water; 4x Kachovka reservoir.

    • @iulianavasiloaia2926
      @iulianavasiloaia2926 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@piotrd.4850 "Simple" :D
      Btw, has the Kachovka reservoir incident wiped out most of Ukraine? Half of Ukraine? Even a 20th of Ukraine?

  • @crustymalone
    @crustymalone 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video presents it as China wouldn't know that.

  • @managepay
    @managepay 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You don’t think China can intercept missiles, bombers?

  • @sophosalpha
    @sophosalpha 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If the war breaks out Taiwan has no chance against PRC. They should surrender with conditions and live with peace

    • @relaxingtrip4224
      @relaxingtrip4224 วันที่ผ่านมา

      lol look how China is vulnerable if Taiwan able to damage the three gorges dam China economy will collapse in an instant

  • @jonassvelander1622
    @jonassvelander1622 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    "War does not determine who is Right, only who is Left." Haha I love a subtle and smart sense of humor! Kind regards from Sweden!

  • @richfuller
    @richfuller 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WOw it's so secret it's publicly known by 8 billion people!!

  • @UCKszbcV
    @UCKszbcV หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are international treaties that forbid targetting dams.

  • @TheAstrobiologistOW
    @TheAstrobiologistOW 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The ecological damage from blowing that dam would be utterly cataclysmic

  • @jonniheinisto9825
    @jonniheinisto9825 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Shirvan i have been watching your channel for about 8 to 9 years now, and i just have to give you compliments that this has to be the best geopolitics channel that i know of. You present everything in such a way that it is simultaneously very detailed, informative and clear & easy to understand, while also being highly entertaining and i would say even hypnotically captivating. The sound effects you have work to not distract but deepen the concentration on the topic itself.
    I also have to mention that i much appreciate your cold neutrality in your presentation, it is a very good quality to have. Its what a professional does.

    • @japjungho4645
      @japjungho4645 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      neutrality? as seen from the moon? This channel is as biased as an Indian one. not gonna say the fact that if something is secret, no channel like the Caspian Sea should know.

  • @troyb.4101
    @troyb.4101 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bye now the Taiwan government has figured out how to destroy that dam. Giving enough time most governments could figure this out.

  • @EAchank
    @EAchank 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sending our love to the good ppl of Taiwan love u guys forever for fighting against Communism much love from Canada!!

  • @muddywolf4459
    @muddywolf4459 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As a resident of Taiwan, let's hope war can be avoided

  • @muhuashen196
    @muhuashen196 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    As a Chinese from PRC, I hope we never go to war with Taiwan and us brothers should always be together. ❤

    • @muhuashen196
      @muhuashen196 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@thotslayer9914 Yessir, Ghelper

    • @Veritas-dq2hs
      @Veritas-dq2hs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@thotslayer9914it's very common in China

    • @c4sualcycl0ps48
      @c4sualcycl0ps48 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s a bit of a contradictory statement. The hypothetical war is all about reunification.

    • @Veritas-dq2hs
      @Veritas-dq2hs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@c4sualcycl0ps48 there could be reunification without war you know.

    • @c4sualcycl0ps48
      @c4sualcycl0ps48 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Veritas-dq2hs based on the current policies of both parties involved that has an extremely low probability of happening.

  • @scottwilliams5642
    @scottwilliams5642 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did anyone else notice the destruction of the 3 Gorges dam flooded everything UPSTREAM and downstream ? Tell me how this works.

  • @CraigHart-sq7mz
    @CraigHart-sq7mz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the damn winds up being bound by who knows who ,Taiwan wouldn’t have to be wiped out.

  • @staremmitor7946
    @staremmitor7946 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let this be a lesson, "for" the Philippines 🇨🇳

  • @hyhhy
    @hyhhy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    If you think China has not considered and is not actively considering such threats and how to deal with them, you live in a dream world.

    • @soothinglycool9806
      @soothinglycool9806 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Still China cant do squat against hypersonic missiles or F 35's. One way traffic to the 3 gorges.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the only real threat to the dam is from the use of nuclear weapons. In which case china has credible second strike capability.

    • @abrahamevangelista4215
      @abrahamevangelista4215 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Anti-Missile defense is an area of interest for many countries. As the conflict in Ukraine has demonstrated, the economics are often in favor of the attacker. That said, presuming Taiwan is capable of destroying it, Chinese leadership practically has no choice but to defend against it, if not an extinction level event, the destruction of the 3 Gorges Dam would still surely still exterminate the party’s grip on power.

    • @user-xj7vu5cl4s
      @user-xj7vu5cl4s 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@abrahamevangelista4215😂😂😂 Which side of mainland China and Taiwan has more missiles? The only army in the world that can launch 1,000 medium-range missiles at a time is the People's Liberation Army. Taiwan has almost no missiles that can hit 1,200 kilometers, not to mention the countless air defense facilities along the way in mainland China. Secondly, ordinary medium-range missiles will not cause devastating damage to the Three Gorges Dam. If you want to destroy it, you must use nuclear weapons. So the question is, does Taiwan have nuclear weapons?

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@abrahamevangelista4215 Kinda like George Bush instantly got impeached after 911, right? Sometimes you have to acknowledge it's not that Chinese goverment is brilliant, it's just that its enemies are all 2 sigma to the left of the curve.
      If Taiwan has anything capable of destroying the dam the reservoir would be drained long before shooting start, and since the only thing capable of destroying it is a tactical nuke, Taiwan would have been bombed long before their nuclear program finishes.

  • @borkwoof696
    @borkwoof696 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Taiwan is kind of like China's Cuba

    • @ricksherman34
      @ricksherman34 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Taiwan is just like Cuba except that they are a democracy, well educated , not socialist nor fascist. So sure.. just like Cuba.

    • @slomo4672
      @slomo4672 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@ricksherman34You missed the point 😂

    • @ricksherman34
      @ricksherman34 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@slomo4672 I didn't watch the whole video. Perhaps I missed a reference.Either way, I hope Winnie the Pooh isn't dumb enough to try and take Taiwan.

    • @aa-hb3tg
      @aa-hb3tg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ricksherman34don’t get surprised if Cuba gets nuclear weapons

    • @ricksherman34
      @ricksherman34 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aa-hb3tg Well Russia tried that once and it didn't work out so well for them, but you're right China could try to do something like this.

  • @Sirnkissako
    @Sirnkissako 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't you think the Chinese are aware of this threat? Don't you think the Chinese will certainly prepare for this scenario with sufficient air defences. In spite of this scenario, would Taiwan actually do something as insane as this. Rather Taiwan like Mainland wishes to live in the previous slow peaceful merging. This would be a US agitated act and would have catastrophic consequences.

  • @freddytang2128
    @freddytang2128 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love how Taiwan's plan is so secret that some guy on youtube could get ahold of it

  • @Quondom
    @Quondom 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    Taiwan is not likely to resort to such extreme measures unless it is on the brink of disaster, which would probably mean that the PLA already has a large force fighting on Taiwanese soil. Under those conditions, Beijing might well hesitate to use nuclear weapons in Taiwan.

    • @mxn1948
      @mxn1948 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      its a non-starter.
      if the pla is on taiwan, nearly all taiwanese air assets and launchers are already dead.
      and as the videos says, the 3 gorges is a gravity dam,
      but the average person really doesnt know what that means.
      it is held in place not by any specific structural design, but by the shear mass of the dam against the bedrock.
      this means the dam literally has no weak points, there is no pillar to bring down the whole thing, there is no section that if pierced that causes it to topple over. you can even poke a hole in it, that hole will leak, but the dam will stand.
      the thing is literally over 100 meters of hardened concrete at the base, 44 meter of concrete at the top, large enough to hold back enough water that has lengthen the day on earth. basically only a nuclear bunker buster is going do anything noteworthy.
      properly designed gravity dam have never failed, all failures to date are because people either built it on ground that is not the bed rock, thus allowing slippage, or they miscalculated the mass needed.
      all this this is not even taking into consideration china's options here.
      for the record i do not think their plan is to just sit back and defend the air space.
      think of it this way, those cheap Iranians suicide drones causing so much trouble for Ukraine? china literally could, right now, manufacture those in the millions per month if war came, those smaller drones? in the tens of millions a month. never mind the current missile, air force and navy mismatch between the two sides.
      virtually no taiwanese air force or cruise missile launcher is going to survive the 1st hr of conflict, never mind be able to launch any kind of mass cruise missile strike, which would need to number 1000+ to even have a tiny chance to poke a hole. at best taiwan hits a few buildings on the mainland in what amounts to basically a terror attack on civilians but one of which does nothing for the military situation..

    • @Quondom
      @Quondom 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@mxn1948 The PLA lacks the amphibious capacity to land much more than 10,000 troops on the beaches, which is about all they could hold anyway. The interior of Taiwan is mountainous and easily defensible, so it would take quite a long struggle to capture the entire island. The Taiwanese have had over 70 years to fortify with bunkers and tunnels, so this would be no easy task, even if no foreign forces came to the rescue. Concerning the dams, you should look up Operation Chastise.

    • @mxn1948
      @mxn1948 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@Quondom doesnt matter? I wasnt talking about the difficulty in landing and occupying, merely that if PLA is on the island, they would have already bombed the heck out of any potential opposition, especially one that can meet them at the beach. taking the mountains, the numbers at landing, has nothing to do with what i was saying.

    • @bobbynotbuilder4389
      @bobbynotbuilder4389 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Quondom yeah but they would have to get there first

    • @evacoustic6506
      @evacoustic6506 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ⁠@@mxn1948you don’t really need to bomb the dam actually. Just bomb a few dams up river and let gravity do the work.

  • @istoppedcaring6209
    @istoppedcaring6209 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    it would disproportionally harm civilians, offcourse it is no different than having a nuclear program

    • @tadhgcronin175
      @tadhgcronin175 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Of course.

    • @user-gc1hg9sp9k
      @user-gc1hg9sp9k 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That the reason blowing the dam are considering a war crime

  • @jinametarasu5117
    @jinametarasu5117 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    aint it a war crime if the dam is destroyed causing civilian casualties? Are we gonna ignore that ethical question since taiwan is with the "good guys"?

  • @bowlampar
    @bowlampar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ability to strike back hard and deep into your enemy homeland is an essence of a bilateral🤔'Peace'.

  • @drlcartman
    @drlcartman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    this is a war crime. I doubt they would do this, even in the most extreme circumstances.

    • @nobodyherepal3292
      @nobodyherepal3292 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So is bombing hospitals, churches, apartments, malls, markets, monuments, grain silos, and water treatment plants…..
      But that hasn’t stopped the Russians so far…..

    • @haruhisuzumiya6650
      @haruhisuzumiya6650 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely a war crime but you can't discount the fact that it would cripple China

    • @shadesmarerik4112
      @shadesmarerik4112 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      oh sweet summer child

    • @patricko9479
      @patricko9479 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So is attacking an independent nation. As soon as China is attacking Taiwan, the first war crime has been commited already.

    • @sang8720
      @sang8720 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Under extreme circumstances, they would do it. This is war you’re talking about here.

  • @pensando_um_pouco
    @pensando_um_pouco 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    "World democracy could have defeated one totalitarian regime after another, the German, then the Soviet. Instead, it strengthened Soviet totalitarianism, helped bring into existence a third totalitarianism, that of China, and all this finally precipitated the present world situation."
    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    • @lakeblackBLM
      @lakeblackBLM 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      World democracy could’ve stopped Germany but they’d rather give them parts of Czechia and make it impossible for black people to participate in the supposed democracy

    • @trevorrogers95
      @trevorrogers95 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lakeblackBLMIt is not impossible for black citizens to vote. You should do the impossible and study history and learn how Stalin and Mao installed their totalitarian regimes, it would really open your eyes.

    • @pensando_um_pouco
      @pensando_um_pouco 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lakeblackBLM Look what we have here. A bloodthirsty communist waving the flag of the most genocidal and totalitarian revolutionary movement the world has ever seen. Aren't you guys tired of killing people? How many millions will have to be sacrificed on the Altar of Revolution for your earthly paradise to become real?

    • @kasugaryuichi9767
      @kasugaryuichi9767 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kemist578 OK tankie

    • @pensando_um_pouco
      @pensando_um_pouco 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lakeblackBLM Bloodthirsty communist got angry. So, are you guys tired of sacrificing people to the revolution? Millions of dead weren't enough?

  • @unclemikeb
    @unclemikeb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Since China knows of this plan they certainly have defensive missiles in place. But of course they cannot be certain their defense is foolproof.
    Hopefully this will serve as a deterrent from China actually attacking Taiwan.

  • @markberglund2056
    @markberglund2056 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The dam will probably break on it's own... due to the "quality " of it's construction. 😉

  • @RN1441
    @RN1441 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I believe that France had a stated policy during the cold war that they had designed their nuclear deterrence such that it could destroy more Soviets than the number of French citizens so any exchange would be a guaranteed relative loss for the USSR. I must imagine that China is keenly aware of the risks of the dam and has invested heavily in air defense for it. I hope we never find out.

    • @the55squad
      @the55squad 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Not that China or the soviet union would care about such losses. They inflicted more than that on themselves for breakfast

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Though that was when they had bodies to spare. Now the military-age males are only-sons and shrinking in number rapidly.

  • @jacobhuff3748
    @jacobhuff3748 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    ”Some actions might be worse than a crime, they might be a mistake." That seems to be applicable to current state far too often. That needs to be a proverb.

    • @zoolghiest7454
      @zoolghiest7454 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree.

    • @Badboi66
      @Badboi66 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@zoolghiest7454it is. Talleyrand!

  • @truesimplicity
    @truesimplicity 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chip Act plus bring all, materials sourcing, manufacturing and distribution back home 🇺🇲

  • @dikamsiyoung807
    @dikamsiyoung807 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "War does not determine who is right, but who is left..." Mind casually blowing here

  • @appa609
    @appa609 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This would also be, by far, the worst war crime ever.

    • @Eliel20117
      @Eliel20117 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The best crime ever

    • @hardcore_bomb5759
      @hardcore_bomb5759 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Eliel20117 most bloody plan ever

  • @randalljones4370
    @randalljones4370 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Does anyone remember the name Möhne ?
    The Möhne Dam was, I believe, 80+ feet thick at it's base, and it was breached by just two 10,000 lb bombs which exploded just 9 m underwater. For the 2 bombs that did the breaching, the cement was perforated in the thinner upper section, but severe cracks were created below the level of the explosion, As the waters rushed through the breach, these some of these cracks merged and the breach increased in the vertical dimension.
    A couple key issues to remember
    - the Dambusters bombs of WWII were not shaped charges by physical design. They did use the water to some extent, but a more modern shaped explosive can deliver a much higher effective blow than the drum-shape of the Vickers Upkeep.
    - who is to say the explosives must be delivered by air?
    Is it difficult to believe that a 20-40k explosive charge could not be hidden in the keel of a large barge, somewhere on the 1000 mile impoundment above the Three Gorges Dam? or under a log-raft?
    - The three Gorges Dam is anything but solid.
    Concrete, in great dimensions, takes an exceedingly long time to set.
    The Hoover Dam is forecast to take at least 125 YEARS to gain it's ultimate strength ... Three Gorges was completed in 2003.
    It is far from being a solid mass of concrete. Not yet.
    The task of breaching this dam is significantly different from the 'fable' that is put forth by many in this comment section.
    It is a big, tough nut ... but not nearly as tough as many here seem to indicate.

    • @chrishooge3442
      @chrishooge3442 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yet, those were bombs delivered by heavy bombers. Aircraft will never get that far into China. It needs to be a missile of some kind. It needs to be delivered in sufficient numbers to accumulate enough damage despite some being intercepted. I don't think Taiwan has hypersonic missiles.

    • @morishimaharuka8754
      @morishimaharuka8754 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrishooge3442 "i dont think taiwan has hypersonic missles" they do have it from your friendly japan and united states of freedom

    • @therealmorf
      @therealmorf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right I'd hit it below the waterline multiple units at different sections just in case the missiles don't hit

  • @Cityb0y85
    @Cityb0y85 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China is like “u cant attack me, only I can attack u” 😅

  • @kaseycassidy2101
    @kaseycassidy2101 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    why not just put torpedos that keep going through the water, send like 10000 of them making it impossible to stop, and just blow the dam up and kill everything going in and out because they’ll get flooded either way