GOOGLE ALSO CENSORS lesser known reportes if it can get away with is. There is an excellent channel called China Uncensored which has been addressing foul play and human rights abuses by the Chinese Communist Party for several years. Recently, if you search the name of the channel it no longer is suggested. Go ahead and try it right now. Most videos by the channel aren't monetized either since the channel doesn't please the Chinese Communist Party , and Google wants in on the Chinese Market. Did i mention that Google is building a cencored search browser to appease the chinese officials?
you mean search engine. also dont forget about that guy who got fired by google because he wrote something based on right-wing politics. I think it was something to do gender but I'm not sure...
@@wclifton968gameplaystutorials If you are talking about James Damore, he was actually suggesting ways to make google more female friendly. He made the mistake of using biology to come to those conclusions. So strange to hear people refer to science based arguments as right wing. A bit refreshing actually.
People need to understand that behind ALL OF THIS, is a deep seeded FEMINIST ideology that pervades through the minds of HR and ADMINISTRATIVE positions in all of these companies. It is purely a FEMALE push. They equate these men as "detractors" from the female grip. Uncontrollable males that are out of bounds are a threat to the feminist agenda.
All speech that doesn't condone specific acts of violence or the violent overthrow of the government is free speech. Period. Hate speech, by definition, is free speech. If we don't defend this principle now, the only free speech we'll have is speech that agrees with me.
That's just your interpretation. Why is speech that suggests violence and overthrowing the government not free speech when such speech was the founding speech of the USA?
Well that's just stupid, give me one good reason why hate speech is a morally good thing? What benefit does it give society? People like you and all these dumbass comments are exactly why we so damn behind. It's not even about agreeing with people it's about working together in unity. If you ain't got nothing nice to say then don't say it it's really that simple
@@jattat1109 what you mean? Like calling him an idiot? I heard his point and it justifies hate? He took a side so unfortunately guess we can't work together. It's just ridiculous to defend the "right" to free speech fuck that there's just some shit you shouldn't say it has nothing to do with rights
So great to see you Mr. Stossel!! You are one of the last real journalists and I think the American people want truth, not to be talked down to, manipulated, or lied to. You do none of those and give us the truth! Thank you sir!
'Memba when John Stossel was defending Howard Stern's right to free speech even though he absolutely was disgusted by the Howard Stern Show? Oh, oh! I 'memba!
I disagree... Expressing an opinion isn't a crime. I want my crazies to be exposed in plain sight so I know who to avoid. I think that anyone should be allowed to state their views no matter how extreme. Nobody should be censored. If they're committing crimes, they should be reported to the authorities. Other than that, let 'em say what they want...
Joe Boyko I oppose censorship as well but I said privately owned companies can censor if they aren’t discriminating against one side or the other and being hypocrites. A five star restaurant has the right to set a dress code for what customers can wear and that’s censoring their expression but it’s their free choice to go to their restaurant. Private companies can set their own rules. Just like how private schools have uniforms or private neighborhoods have rules for what kind of houses you can have or the fact that business tell you that you can’t scream racist things or walk in the nude even though both of those things are protected under freedom of expression that applies to public areas and private areas can set their own rules.
Joe Boyko also companies who choose to censor can be held accountable for what is published on their platform because they censor. If they choose not to censor than the individuals can be held accountable for their own actions. Right now big tech wants it both ways and that’s the problem. They want to censor and they don’t want to be held accountable for what’s published on their platform. That’s what I think is wrong. You are either an open platform or a private business and should be treated and held accountable biased on what you choose.
Jones and Milo do not say hateful things. They say outrageous things, that are often exaggerations, and offend some people. Simply because they offend some people, does not make them hateful. Hate is when you actually hate a group of people, Neither Milo, nor Alex Jones say things that are in any way "hateful" of any group or class of people. Stossel is very wrong to say that.
the language itself is under attack. 'Hate' is too subjective, and cannot be proven, unlike actual legal precedent against violence or calls for violence.
i'm no genius but how do videos that have no to low views get flagged for hate speech? it's almost as if they know they want to flag those videos before people see them or something
Well...John wasted his time on nuts like McInnes and Jones. He should have spent more time covering FB and YT censorship of more reasonable voices like Prager, Dr Michael Brown, The Activist Mommy, and many others.
Are they _really_ private companies? Because I thought that all of the major tech companies (Google in particular) have received numerous, taxpayer backed subsidies to the tune of *billions* of dollars. Giving them an unfair market advantage against any potential competitor...
or make a social media site thats works like the dark web style cant be shut down or controled by gov or private companys to spy and censorship users but with limmited control to stop real horrid groups like child molesters and real terrorists exc abusing it to recruit but they already have there own dark web websites!
Consider requesting a zip file of all your posts, photos, conversations, shared posts and literally everything else you have ever looked at, clicked on, typed or searched on fbook, then downloading and deleting your account.
Personally I don't believe in censorship in any form. If you don't like it don't watch it, don't read it and raise cosmopolitan children like Auntie Mame would. Explain things to your children and I don't know actually be parents to your children and prepare them for the real world not shelter them. XD
Same here. As a parent, I try to balance being comforting, but also giving them life lessons to toughen up against society. Was so proudf of my eldest taking one of my talks with her to heart, to instead of demanding people be stopped from laughing at her if she did something silly, turn it around and laugh with them, owning it and winning friends instead.
John Stossel. You inferred that Alex Jones was "Far Right", but he calls himself a classical liberal, John don't be like reason tv by labeling others as something their not and pretending to be libertarian when they're on the left. I hardly ever watch Gavin McGinnis but his comments were appropriate despite you disavowing them.
Alex Jones is not far right, and I don't condone the total banning he has seen from all major sites, but he is pretty nutty at least, not just a "classical liberal".
Come on... I know you are arguing against censorship but you specifically chose clips from Gavin that makes him appear as a hate monger rather than a comedian. Regardless of your intentions, the negative stereotype that you helped perpetuate on a political-talk satire host will do far more damage to our anti-censorship argument than your message will do good. The left will continue to fight tooth and nail for censorship and the conclusion will continuously be compromise such as, "well yeah I agree a person like THAT shouldn't be allowed to say those things."
Censorship is about thought control. But there is a backlash when it is unjustified by public opinion, causing an opposite reaction wanted by the censors.
These companies CANNOT LEGALLY CENSOR. They signed up with Congress as public platforms but are actually in fact publishers. They need to be brought to their knees.
If they (the social media platforms) wish to remove things they don’t like, then make them legally liable for the things the do allow. Since by that definition they are a publisher and no longer just a platform.
I remember when silicon Valley was celebrating the "information super highway" & how information was to flow freely & wouldn't be restrained by corporations & trapped in books only accessible to the wealthy. Lol" that sure has changed!
These 'private companies' recieve thousands of subsidies and tax breaks for the government. While this continues, they should be subject to the 1st amendment. Of course, the best solution would be to eliminate these subsidies and stop protecting these companies from competition.
The minute a web site censors based on content, they lose their status as a platform and become a publisher. They become liable and responsible for all content on their website.
The leaked video of the Google execs crying over Hillary losing, in a company meeting speaks volumes.
GOOGLE ALSO CENSORS lesser known reportes if it can get away with is. There is an excellent channel called China Uncensored which has been addressing foul play and human rights abuses by the Chinese Communist Party for several years. Recently, if you search the name of the channel it no longer is suggested. Go ahead and try it right now. Most videos by the channel aren't monetized either since the channel doesn't please the Chinese Communist Party , and Google wants in on the Chinese Market. Did i mention that Google is building a cencored search browser to appease the chinese officials?
you mean search engine. also dont forget about that guy who got fired by google because he wrote something based on right-wing politics. I think it was something to do gender but I'm not sure...
The google staffers were competing on who was the most sad, straight out of North Korea...
@@wclifton968gameplaystutorials If you are talking about James Damore, he was actually suggesting ways to make google more female friendly. He made the mistake of using biology to come to those conclusions. So strange to hear people refer to science based arguments as right wing. A bit refreshing actually.
@@GenderDork thats who I was exactly talking about. I remember the whole situation now, thanks...
This video is about to be removed by TH-cam censorship.
Yes, censorship is a thing...
youtube unsubbed me from stossel yet again...
Naw. They can just demonetize it and hide it from the rank algorithms.
LMAO. I dont know whether to laugh or cry at all of this malarky. Protect free speech!!!
People need to understand that behind ALL OF THIS, is a deep seeded FEMINIST ideology that pervades through the minds of HR and ADMINISTRATIVE positions in all of these companies. It is purely a FEMALE push. They equate these men as "detractors" from the female grip. Uncontrollable males that are out of bounds are a threat to the feminist agenda.
Stossel is a national treasure! Thank you for your no holds barred truth seeking!
"the best answer to speech we don't like, is more speech"
Amen my friend, couldn't agree more
Yet Louis Farrakhan still has a twitter page
ZackAttack Missouri And so do other left-wing extremists
I don't agree with every thing everyone says, but they have the right to say it.
We've been censored since social media started. And if you post what they want you're fine. But speak your own mind and permanent ban
Wheatons speed shop
Only NPC are allowed.
@@laurawoodward9466 sounds right 😔
@@laurawoodward9466 I am human. Orange man bad. Fuck Trump. REEEEE! Error audio playback broken. Have a nice day.
So these lefties like all the MGTOW channels that get hundreds of thousands of not millions of views?
Since watching John on 20/20 as a kid, this guy has never compromised his integrity. That's admirable.
"The best answer to speech we don't like, is more speech."
Brilliant!
"The best answer to speech we don't like is more speech "
All speech that doesn't condone specific acts of violence or the violent overthrow of the government is free speech. Period. Hate speech, by definition, is free speech. If we don't defend this principle now, the only free speech we'll have is speech that agrees with me.
That's just your interpretation. Why is speech that suggests violence and overthrowing the government not free speech when such speech was the founding speech of the USA?
Well that's just stupid, give me one good reason why hate speech is a morally good thing? What benefit does it give society? People like you and all these dumbass comments are exactly why we so damn behind. It's not even about agreeing with people it's about working together in unity. If you ain't got nothing nice to say then don't say it it's really that simple
By your very definition many, many people would be censored for expressing themselves passionately. If it's illegal, it's to be taken down.
@@MidnightH3ro If you want to work together, why do you need to shut some people down?
@@jattat1109 what you mean? Like calling him an idiot? I heard his point and it justifies hate? He took a side so unfortunately guess we can't work together. It's just ridiculous to defend the "right" to free speech fuck that there's just some shit you shouldn't say it has nothing to do with rights
“The best answer for speech we don’t like is more speech”. Absolutely!
So great to see you Mr. Stossel!! You are one of the last real journalists and I think the American people want truth, not to be talked down to, manipulated, or lied to. You do none of those and give us the truth! Thank you sir!
Give me a break. He is late to the party. The weasel waited till the real journalists did the heavy lifting; now he weighs in????
Stossel and Tucker: The best, most American Journalists for the last 10+ YEARS!
'Memba when John Stossel was defending Howard Stern's right to free speech even though he absolutely was disgusted by the Howard Stern Show?
Oh, oh! I 'memba!
Pepperidge Farm remembers...
I don't like Howard either but he does have the right to speak. I just turn him off. We all have a choice.
Fuck Howard stern... but id shoot a liberal baby to defend his right to say whatever he wants
Yeah, I also 'memba when black people had to sit at the back of the bus...Oh, the good old days...
Cal Anon dick
I would tolerate if privately own business like social media censored both sides for extremists but left extremists are never censored.
I disagree... Expressing an opinion isn't a crime. I want my crazies to be exposed in plain sight so I know who to avoid. I think that anyone should be allowed to state their views no matter how extreme. Nobody should be censored. If they're committing crimes, they should be reported to the authorities. Other than that, let 'em say what they want...
Joe Boyko I oppose censorship as well but I said privately owned companies can censor if they aren’t discriminating against one side or the other and being hypocrites. A five star restaurant has the right to set a dress code for what customers can wear and that’s censoring their expression but it’s their free choice to go to their restaurant. Private companies can set their own rules. Just like how private schools have uniforms or private neighborhoods have rules for what kind of houses you can have or the fact that business tell you that you can’t scream racist things or walk in the nude even though both of those things are protected under freedom of expression that applies to public areas and private areas can set their own rules.
Joe Boyko also companies who choose to censor can be held accountable for what is published on their platform because they censor. If they choose not to censor than the individuals can be held accountable for their own actions. Right now big tech wants it both ways and that’s the problem. They want to censor and they don’t want to be held accountable for what’s published on their platform. That’s what I think is wrong. You are either an open platform or a private business and should be treated and held accountable biased on what you choose.
They claim to be promoting a "classless society", but the relationship is just not equal
Freedom of speech is not hate speech!!
Well said. Social media influences a lot what people think these days, so it's truly an important issue.
I love Gavin!!
He’s awesome!
What so many fail to realize is that even "hate" speech is FREE SPEECH. Thanks for sharing John Stossel!
I love McInnes... I'm not ashamed of that.
We shouldn't be
Thank you John, your work is great! Keep the conversation alive.
Jones and Milo do not say hateful things. They say outrageous things, that are often exaggerations, and offend some people. Simply because they offend some people, does not make them hateful.
Hate is when you actually hate a group of people, Neither Milo, nor Alex Jones say things that are in any way "hateful" of any group or class of people. Stossel is very wrong to say that.
The left always likes to take what particularly Alex says out of context.
the language itself is under attack. 'Hate' is too subjective, and cannot be proven, unlike actual legal precedent against violence or calls for violence.
The best answer to speech we don't like, is more speech. Thank you, John.
I have yet to hear an evil quote from Alex Jones.
Gavin just says out loud what many of us are thinking. Not allowed to do that!
i'm no genius but how do videos that have no to low views get flagged for hate speech? it's almost as if they know they want to flag those videos before people see them or something
Activist groups no doubt monitor videos and flag them as soon as they go live
I grew up watching you Mr. Stossel. Thank you for influencing my life in a positive way.
Another great video!
Well...John wasted his time on nuts like McInnes and Jones.
He should have spent more time covering FB and YT censorship of more reasonable voices like Prager, Dr Michael Brown, The Activist Mommy, and many others.
Thanks John. Great work!
I like spicy! I like Gavin! And you, too, John. ; )
Well done!
I wish stossel made more videos
Great video John. Love your shows. Keep them coming.
Are they _really_ private companies? Because I thought that all of the major tech companies (Google in particular) have received numerous, taxpayer backed subsidies to the tune of *billions* of dollars. Giving them an unfair market advantage against any potential competitor...
Keep em coming Johnny!
someone should create a rightwing social media site
yeah, that is the solution, more tribalism and division... *eyeroll*
there already are some sites such as gab.ai but their being censored by their hosting company 'supposedly'
or make a social media site thats works like the dark web style cant be shut down or controled by gov or private companys to spy and censorship users but with limmited control to stop real horrid groups like child molesters and real terrorists exc abusing it to recruit but they already have there own dark web websites!
Ted Schoenling Then they better remove leftwing social media sites to then.
4chan is kinda mixed on its views but maybe it has what you are looking for.
I love Gavin laughing at what he said. IDGAF.
On the surface Gavin sounds like a complese @$$ until you look past the surface and see what he's REALLY talking about.
But are they really private companies (if you take a deeper look)?
It's a hard question really. I have heard good reasons on both sides of the argument. I am undecided.
Great to get a clear view on these issues.
I'm Banned from FB, for 30 days for a meme .
Consider requesting a zip file of all your posts, photos, conversations, shared posts and literally everything else you have ever looked at, clicked on, typed or searched on fbook, then downloading and deleting your account.
Wow John, this was incredible. Good job.
Personally I don't believe in censorship in any form. If you don't like it don't watch it, don't read it and raise cosmopolitan children like Auntie Mame would. Explain things to your children and I don't know actually be parents to your children and prepare them for the real world not shelter them. XD
Same here. As a parent, I try to balance being comforting, but also giving them life lessons to toughen up against society. Was so proudf of my eldest taking one of my talks with her to heart, to instead of demanding people be stopped from laughing at her if she did something silly, turn it around and laugh with them, owning it and winning friends instead.
Stossel nailing it again!
John Stossel. You inferred that Alex Jones was "Far Right", but he calls himself a classical liberal, John don't be like reason tv by labeling others as something their not and pretending to be libertarian when they're on the left. I hardly ever watch Gavin McGinnis but his comments were appropriate despite you disavowing them.
Alex Jones is not far right, and I don't condone the total banning he has seen from all major sites, but he is pretty nutty at least, not just a "classical liberal".
@@HansKSG He claimed to be classical liberal in the past.
Long time fan. Thank you for covering "controversial" conservatives. BTW the air queefs were sarcasm.
Come on... I know you are arguing against censorship but you specifically chose clips from Gavin that makes him appear as a hate monger rather than a comedian. Regardless of your intentions, the negative stereotype that you helped perpetuate on a political-talk satire host will do far more damage to our anti-censorship argument than your message will do good. The left will continue to fight tooth and nail for censorship and the conclusion will continuously be compromise such as, "well yeah I agree a person like THAT shouldn't be allowed to say those things."
The last thing Stossel says in this video is just perfect- "The best answer to speech we don't like...is more speech."
Love you John Stossel! THANK YOU!!!!!!!
Stossel is such a brilliant guy his form is impeccable
On the spot John.
Stossel nails it again!
Stossel, brilliant ... as usual.
Great video! Thanks John!
True, honest freedom of speech will ALWAYS offend someone.
Making people think is the crime they see
Another reason why you're my favorite Libertarian commentator.
Glad to see you back John. Watched you as a kid growing up late at night. A true liberal in the Thomas Jefferson vain.
The truth is sometimes painful to hear.
Censorship is about thought control. But there is a backlash when it is unjustified by public opinion, causing an opposite reaction wanted by the censors.
Another great video by John Stossel!!!
Damn good unbiased reporting John! This is how news coverage is meant to be.
I came from the Ben Shapiro interview with Stossel i subscribed good content.👍👍👍
I totally agree!
Good points and a wide range of sources. Thanks for sharing.
Good points. Good stuff 👍🏼
John is the best 👍
Six years ago and still going on.
John I love you videos! I'd love to watch your full interview with Gavin.
I had the same experience with Quora and I actually looked at the content guidelines and I clearly didn’t violate it.
They have absolutly no right to do that
These companies CANNOT LEGALLY CENSOR. They signed up with Congress as public platforms but are actually in fact publishers. They need to be brought to their knees.
I don't ever remember being forced to follow or listen to McGinnes or Jones. No censorship needed.
Socrates invited people to Argue with him!
Proud of your boy!
Keep up the good work stossel. Mcinnes deserves a platform and so does jones. Their censorship is laughable but we still cant tolerate it.
I have to agree...!
Amen Stossel
I love Gavin! Such a funny guy.
If they (the social media platforms) wish to remove things they don’t like, then make them legally liable for the things the do allow. Since by that definition they are a publisher and no longer just a platform.
I live in Georgia and all TH-cam shows is ads for Stacy Abrams but have yet seen an ad for Mike Kemp. Hmmm.
I remember when silicon Valley was celebrating the "information super highway" & how information was to flow freely & wouldn't be restrained by corporations & trapped in books only accessible to the wealthy. Lol" that sure has changed!
He had nothing to say but so
Love Gavin. We need more of him
Indeed
Excellent video!
Zing! You did it again Stossel. +1
McGinnis is my type of American, If the music's too loud you're too old, Shit Kicker's & Tobasco Sauce, Yee-
Haw!
Thank God for Gavin...
These 'private companies' recieve thousands of subsidies and tax breaks for the government. While this continues, they should be subject to the 1st amendment.
Of course, the best solution would be to eliminate these subsidies and stop protecting these companies from competition.
"You don't like, be a hermit"
That interview with Adam Savage was awesome 😎
If it offends you just don't listen.
Every video with Stossel is music in my ears
You need more subscribers. Everybody please get the word out on this channel
It is better that fools be allowed to speak and thus expose their foolishness than for them to remain hidden.
We need more people like Gavin McGinnis!
The minute a web site censors based on content, they lose their status as a platform and become a publisher. They become liable and responsible for all content on their website.
Gavins description of Muslims was entirely correct.