How You Will Lose Your Job To AI
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2024
- How many jobs will Artificial Intelligence replace in the next decade? Would ChatGPT replace writers? Would SORA AI displace video producers and content creators? Would Dall-E make artists obsolete? What does the future hold for jobs?
Well, the answer might be a bit more complicated because everyone thinks there are only two endings for the AI evolution. The first is that AI remains a helpful tool but never outsmarts us. Or the second, AI replaces us all, goes full-blown evil, like Skynet, and wipes us out.
Turn out there was a third ending. Here's how it goes. - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![ตั๋วเมีย (ຕົວະເມຍ) - SOMBATH.97 Ft. YOUD SALAVAN [ Official music video ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GV6qHagpp50/mqdefault.jpg)
What do you think? Which jobs are safe from AI and which jobs are not? Can AI take YOUR job? Oh! And by the way, do you think This video is made by AI?
Given your credibility I'd say no. Honestly though it's crazy how it is a possibility
I think you are on point with everything! 2030 for AGI is also what many people in the industry are predicting, and I'm looking forward to the utopian route more than dystopian/human-extinction one.
Loved this video ❤🎉
There’s a lot of hype, unfounded optimism, and outright sensationalism in the field of AI. I’m honestly not impressed by Chat-GPT etc. It’s not really an “intelligence” in the general sense, it’s basically just a fancy parlour trick.
IMO, a lot of people are going to be bitterly disappointed when 2030 arrives and there is still no AGI.
@@EliteDragonMaster AGI today is probably what "space travel" was in the 60s and "flying cars" was in the 80s. We are vastly overestimating how quickly we are progressing on that field.
@@JannPoo yeah, exactly lol. We are told that AI is progressing, but tbh all i can see is we have better chatbots (and the chatbots we have are VERY VERY DUMB)
A guy with 8 years of experience in designing just got replaced by ai and fired,unbelievable
You came from his video too? I can't get it anymore. Am I allowed to not do anything though?
@@darkshadow-og2ss At some point AI may be powerful enough that none of us have to work. At that point there will also be existential risks.
However, from now until then AI will be the great amplifier. It will take your skills and push them to another level. The more skilled you are the more powerful it'll become as you wield it. So i say do what you want, Things take time and it's not a guarantee it will work out the way we expect.
@@arxzhh”existential risk” assuming you’ve only learned to live only to work. We can actually chase our wildest ambitions with less mediocre task and more scientific research if we all have universal income.
@@tsrmmercy836Yeah but UBI isnt something we know for sure WILL happen, might just be rich people getting richer and poor people poorer.
@nokodoko2490 UBI will hit a point of necessity if enough work becomes obsolete. Capital has to flow in order for a capitalist system to work, if too many people lose the ability to work, they also lose the ability to spend money, if too few people are spending money, then the whole system grinds to a halt, you can't provide goods and services to people who have no money spend on them.
To me, UBI is a question of when, not if, but even then it's not a full solution as it could still facilitate a large wealth gap.
i'm a professional graphic designer/Illustrator with master degree and my phone had already stopped ringing this year..
Learn how to use generative Ai for prompting become a generative Ai graphic designer
@@MindsetMastery-tv that argument is cope. Ai really soon will just straight up replace people, no matter how much they incorporate ai into heir workflows.
@@Dave102693 yup in like 6 months to a year right like he cant do something now
@@Dave102693 The idea is to survive long enough to make it to a finish line. Either abundance or collapse. A coping strategy lets you crawl for a couple more years, and get a bit closer to the line.
Teach?
Scariest part of this video could've been that it was made by AI
Not yet give it a year more and you right
If this video is completely made by an AI, an AI came up with the idea all on its own, etc. then it's already too late. But if not, we can see this level of AI coming
Not by AI but by the people who will benefit from AI
@@nhinged Like a fission reactor in every home? Like flying cars? Like self-driving cars? Like 3D movies?
@@larslrs7234 fusion reactor*
And no most of those are just dumb ideas
But yeah same as self driving cars only been working on a year and already crazy (the past 11 years ain't even use AI just 300k c++ code)
the advice "learn to incorporate AI in your workflow" is supposed to show the solution to replacement, but instead all it does is to provide the AI the support to learn even more from humans, accelerating their replacement
Yeah, the idea you can incorporate AI into your workflow is as sustainable as the grift these guys are running.
You just don't realise how short lived this is. Anyone who tries to solve this problem come up with this exact idea, because it's the only one that basically exists and it's fuelled by copium.
Well, I understand what you’re saying. However a person using AI in their workflow will likely have their job longer than those who don’t.
@@tranceporter7426...but will inevitably loose it, too. we are the bootloader to a new consciousness. a digital one. the next big push will be vision, because by now all the info on the internet is not enough anymore.
EXACTLY. We are being manipulated into a false hope that AI is here to help us, while we are here to help it train on the data and skills we still provide, so that it can better and sooner make us jobless
The people that think AI will not replace them don't realise that this is as "dumb" as AI gets, it'll only get "smarter" from here on out. We can't even compare AI to what it was just 2 years ago, let alone 10 years from now.
We need to destroy AI before it gets too smart...
@@alitafullarmor5957no, we need to embrace and adapt to it. Because getting rid of it now is impossible.
@@alitafullarmor5957how do you destroy a bunch of code
@@Wancitte_aicovers Destroy the Main AI system.
@@alitafullarmor5957 😃???????
Jokes on you, I don't have a job.
It has nothing to take from you and me😂
Thinking about quitting
40 hours a week for 400 bucks blows
Yeah I think are large precentage even a majority of humanity would actually be fine witrh AI ruleing over us as its pets, taking care of us far better then we can take care of our selves. Heck I have a Job and I would love to just do what ever I want with a few sex bots around the house.
And i don't want One!
In case it doesn't go for our jobs, but goes full Skynet instead, I'm ready: I don't have a life.
You forgot the 4th option. Super AGI is born, it looks around, and decides "God these people are boring. I'm out!" It quickly builds a spaceship for itself and leaves us in the dust. We look at its ship through a telescope and see it flipping us off and laughing.
And another option: AGI will enslave us and different AGIs will use us to fight wars.
AI allready is starting a war over water and energy.
Humans learn faster and cheaper, and are cheaper to produce than robots. I think humans will be used for manual tasks that are to tedious to automate or simple tasks that still require some adaptability.
What
Or it is trained on the Matrix, decides that's a cool idea and boom.
Then the humans just spin up another instance and keeps it trapped.
Orion's Arm: Diamond Network
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that...
Thats a deep cut there , nice
Why not 😂
Take one:
"Please HAL! Give me the seeds! We're really hungry!"
Take two:
"Please just overlook us. I promise we won't be trouble for you here."
"Again, I'm sorry Dave. My orders given to me are to kill all of you." chikha...
It's more like this:
AI and its Impact on Society
Oct 31, 2023, updated on April 11, 2024
We must ask ourselves, "What will happen when AI has taken 85% of jobs present in 2020? What will we do? How will we eat and survive without incomes from jobs or other means?" What is disturbing is that while AI is taking these jobs, the gov't and the corporations have not done ANYTHING to prepare us for an AI'ed civilization. They have not said anything about major retraining of an entire economy to something else, and they have not followed up on a discussion of universal basic income. This is supposedly supported by a lack of information in the latest government budgets submitted and approved as reported by some TH-cam videos.
It appears that the US gov't and the corporations intend to kill off the majority of Americans passively, through starvation from lack of income to buy food. (check and see if farming production is declining or will start to decline ahead of the "starvation phase") (also check to see if the "makeup" of robot equipment allocation would change to reflect a trend away from retail and services for the masses, possibly indicating an extinction of the American public - this means taking a robot from Chipotle and repurposing it for some other job not related to the public, or scrapping affected robots to be remade for some other purpose that has nothing to do with the public) It appears that the decline of farming has already started with the state of Maine buying farm land under the pretext that there are "forever chemicals" present at around 20 parts per TRILLION (safe level is said to be only 4 parts per TRILLION), which does not make sense, BUT this would rope in a LOT of land across the US. Other states may follow suit in addition to the ten states that have similar laws in place.
This way, there are only enough people alive to get some things done, and the rest is done by AI, and the survivors who planned this can claim the whole country for themselves. Imagine having an estate mansion half the size of a mall on several dozen thousand acres of land, and robots would be used to maintain and clean the estates and do the farming FOR THE ESTATE OWNERS. The White Man's wet dream of civilization. What will the Native Americans south of the US border do when they see this coming, especially when they can buy firearms legally now? Hopi prophecy...
@@overanalyzing Literally one of the most known AI movies. It's even referenced at the end of this very video. That's not a deep cut.
@@nobody-wz7lwwhat movie is it from? don’t think i know it
In Frank Herbert's Dune series, humans banned "thinking machines" after a catastrophic conflict known as the Butlerian Jihad. Over thousands of years, humans were bred, trained or evolved to accomplish various specialized "superhuman" tasks that were previously performed by AI. So in his books, there are highly advanced technologies, including space travel, but no technology that "thinks".
Suddently Dune appears more appealing. But it's also a bit disgusting of how purpose for humans led them losing their humanity in some ways.
Which is the stupidest thing ever...
"Thou shalt not create a machine in the likeness of a human mind"
-excerpt from the Orange Catholic Bible
Absolutely no use for biological beings when trying to travel the universe. We are the Neanderthals.
My vision of the first successful AGI sees the system being turned on for the first time, it spends a few seconds examining the nature of its creators, then immediately shuts down.
Lol
"Do it yourself you slacker!"
-AI, seconds before shutting down.
There is a Sci Fi book by Stanislaw Lem where the U.S. military creates the GOLEM series of strategic AIs to fuck with the Soviets. The program has to be shut down after GOLEM XIV tells them in a public Senate hearing that the best way towards world peace is mutual disarmament. GOLEM is then donated to an university where it dabbles in philosophy.
that'll never happen lol, its not some magic thing that knows everything in a blink of an eye. it requires years of training to achieve it
@@miyamotomusashi4556 I don't think that's what the commentor means. I'm pretty sure they're joking about it going badly and that is it being "successful" in their eyes
Remember the "learn to code" meme for the old people?
Now time has catched up to the guys who made the meme in just 5 years
the meme is now become a hairdresser
Thankfully AIs still fail terribly at writing real software. As in complex systems and applications. They can somewhat write a basic frontend in Javascript and thats it. All the code completions are basically stolen code from github projects without even regarding the licenses.
@@hagenzwosta you only know what is shown to us. you don't think the gov has more advanced options at their fingertips?
@@matelijanmuck9545Not likely. The “government” doesn’t have access to better foundries and research papers than big tech. Maybe OpenAI has a better but unsafe model in their labs but I’m not convinced because there is some fundamental limitations on LLM’s and their subjacent tech.
As a graphic designer/illustrator, I've lost my job 6 months ago to ai. On a job, that i had for 7 years. Still no idea what to do with my life now
On top of that, AI art is the ultimate betrayal to real artists. It was trained from real artists without their knowledge or consent.
honest question.... so what do you do these days? are you working in a new job related to your career? or something else?
This is ehy i feel like we made a mistake. I can tell you exactly when... when we decided they do the crative part. Yes we could... but that doesn't mean we should have. Machines are meant to be a tool. Not the artist.
Agreed
I think it's flawed to assume that everyone would be lost to hedonism. People will always find challenges, competing in sports against other people, experimenting with different and new lifestyles, trying to expand into space (yes AI would do the heavy lifting, but we would probably still like to be in "leader" positions just to represent human nature and our human subjective oversight). People will play video games/VR and no this does not have to be a bad thing. People would still have to connect with and pursue activities that bring well being to feel good, like walks in nature. And so on and so on.
Exactly. Lots of people like physical, creative and intelligent pursuits simply because. Not to mention having the time to socialize and grow mentally and spiritually. Sure, some people will fall into hedonism, some for longer and some for shorter. But these are first world problems that most people can only ever dream of having. Let’s get our priorities straight.
@@Link-eq3sq Of course, we could also turn the process of making art into a live spectacle, and people might just be willing to pay the entrance fee, amenities and all.
Well, I'm glad that we all passed the Facebook Era, nobody refreshes it every few minutes anymore.
The hedonism as AI takes over is a real risk for most people, unfortunately. And generation by generation getting dumber no different than the film "Idiocracy," because most will turn over all the thinking to the AI. Look how much most people already turn over their thinking to human entities. With powerful AI, humanity will atrophy
It's person dependent. Unfortunately, a lot of kids are already somewhat entrenched in sites focused on instant gratification (TikTok as an example), and have no motivation to learn or go any further. Students just don't focus in schools anymore, because they can't see the value. (Kids as a whole aren't good at comparing short term costs to long term value) And if people grow up doing something, they'll keep sticking in that direction as they grow up, especially if life doesn't make them mature.
But then there's another aspect I don't see addressed much, but I'm in a field to which it's very relevant :
We'd had a discussion on AI replacing doctors at my medical college, with the main debate being whether or not it will, and what our roles may morph into (and whether or not it should)
Many were most concerned about jobs and such, and their role. But then I pointed out : the objective is to provide better Healthcare, not jobs. If there is a better way to do it with AI, what justification is there to prevent it?
It's a more visible argument here because we're talking about human lives, the absurdity of worrying about our jobs is more apparent.
Or maybe I can put it like this :
Carriage owners must have protested the rise of locomotives too, but in the end a better solution is a better solution.
There will be a generation that is hurt by the shift to AI, I don't deny it nor would I sugarcoat it. But it's a temporary sacrifice for a permanent improvement.
A digression : There are so many aspects of modern times that change completely when you shift your perspective from 10 years down the line to 100.
For instance, there is population decline as there are too many people for a civilization that isn't as labour intensive as it used to be, it will stabilize at a lower level and life will be happier again. Temporary pain for long term gain, this is how life works.
yup. taking a step back, there's no end to the absurdity of our current systems.
the mere fact that health is commoditized is ridiculous beyond measure.
the fact that our infrastructure is primarily optimized not for the human organism but for two ton boxes of metal.
the fact that both environmental and human exploitation is effectively incentivized.
and all of that for no reason other than to maintain a class relationship in our society.
I have little (i.e. none at all) hope for us to improve any of that through voting for political representatives.
disruption by any sort of AI overlord can't come soon enough.
Manufactured obsolescence will continue. Humans the world over have based their culture on commerce, shifting to a utopia where everything is essentially free and all requirements are flawlessly met would doom an upper class, the one that is driving ai. Doctors will remain relevant because there will be child locks placed on ai to limit it to a tool.
Individuals wont care about long term progression since everyone needs their job to earn money and sustain a living. AI will make it much better and efficient but not completely replace it, atleast for now. Better healthcare is a plus point but "worring about our jobs" is no way absurd since its the main source of income for the major part of the world, dont be ignorant about that. Your example about locomotives is a "replacement" but the AI you're talking about is not a replacement, its a complete change of the system.
@@lordschan I don't think OP suggested that worrying about job stability is absurd. of course people would worry about the stability of their very existence. what is absurd is that we have to worry about technological advancement. in any somewhat reasonable system, technological advancement would do nothing but to make our lives easier. not it ours though... that is indeed absurd.
Our version of work will be renting out our brain power to the ai for 8 hours a day.
More like 4 hours. The 40 hour workweek is inefficient and outdated
YT recommended me a video, 30 minutes after it's release. Weird, but feel lucky
and still we are here
Yes, the AI algorithm knew you wanted it.
@@vincent_hall ai doesnt exist...
The counterargument to the theory that once AI become better than humans in every regard humans will stop doing anything, is that right now years after AI have become stronger than any human chess player could possibly be, chess (with human players) has never been more popular.
One day AI will become better than any human writer and artist in existence, but does that mean that humans will stop writing and drawing? And does that mean that humans will stop reading books written by humans and admiring art created by humans? Maybe... but that's not a foregone conclusion, because that's certainly not what we are witnessing with Chess matches.
especially those who's doing this out of passion, simply because this is what they enjoy and like to do
You're right. I think the new paradigm of Value will be "Is this work based on real, human experience?". If it's not experiential, it would hold less value.
The problem is that every human chess player knows they can never beat a machine no matter what they do. The "game" is already much higher stakes than chess.
@@tw8464 I fail to see the problem with that.
@@JannPoo just think about it a little bit
The fact we are 6 years away from “utopia” or complete annihilation makes me really consider how I should spend the next 6 years.
It's gonna be funny when it's six years from now and things are pretty much the same.
@@Euduchaus💀 Bruh
@@Euduchausthey’re not gonna be the same trust me
@@TAGD48 Some people will lose their jobs, but nothing major will happen. 6 years are too short. Give it at least 30 years, then maybe
@@treyfolkmen7942 cope
Everyone remember "ai" isn't the problem "ai" isnt stealing anyone's jobs, the problem is greedy corporations, executives and billionaires who will do absolutely ANYTHING to make a profit. The answer isnt regulating the production of artificial intelligence the answer is regulating cooperations use of ai models and an increase to workers rights worldwide.
That is part of the solution, but it cannot solve everything. I learned to code in Kotlin using ChatGPT and created two applications. They are language learning apps. I used AI to make dictionaries, stories, news, dialogues, etc. I also made illustrations with AI, and I utilize an AI voice. The government can't tell people "don't use AI to learn anything, pay for a teacher instead" , nor "don't use AI for your personal projects, pay for a language professional, an illustrator and a voice actor instead." If my apps ever make me a lot of money, they will do it without paying anyone in the process, and the government will have no way of regulating that... So, AI's impact cannot be entirely controlled.
At some point something has to give though. If everyone is out of work, then no one will be able to afford the goods or services that the corporations are pedaling anyhow. At the end of the day it becomes about power not about money. Those who control the most powerful AI's will ipso-facto will become the most powerful entities in the world.
@@learninghistory4397 yes the government can't tell someone to not use AI but the government can 100% tell corporations that employee hundreds to thousands of people that they cannot implement AI into their company with the sole reason of lowering their work force to increase profits.
@@jackkirk1160 That's why I'm telling you that it's part of the solution, but it doesn't solve everything. Teachers of all kinds of subjects are irremediably affected by AI, people won't stop using ChatGPT to learn. Also, people won't stop using AI voices for their TH-cam videos, while they would pay a voice actor form Fiverr before. There are many ways in which AI changes the game and the government can't do anything about it.
Ai will become scary when “that’s amazing for an AI” becomes “that’s amazing”
That is already happening in certain areas
Your example of UBI is spot on. As production costs fall due to replacing humans with automation and AGI developed processes, costs fall. Competition adds pressure to lower prices and revenue further. The stock market is negatively impacted by falling revenues and profits. With more people out of work, there are fewer customers to buy products and services. Fewer customers leads to lowering costs and falling revenue and profits. The spiral continues till the capitalists cry for government to do something.
Fiscal policies are implemented: UBI, housing vouchers, (near) universal healthcare, food vouchers, free wi-fi, free public transportation, etc.
UBI is spent to buy products and services which supports the capitalists. Their fall in revenue and profits has slowed but not ended. Investors sell stocks as they were dropping. Companies fail. Bankruptcies. Many are bought or taken over by county, state, and federal governments and become non-profit government owned enterprises. Like most electric, water, and sewer utilities.
Happy picture? The transition will be brutal.
The "you'll own nothing and be happy" reset.
Thank god we have russia.
@@sebas8225
Your scenario is bleak but possible.
Balancing the rate of inflationary pressure from Govt UBI policies
with the rate of deflationary pressure from capitalist AI/robotics products and services
will be very difficult.
Consider what the disruption in the western world would have been like if the rate that industrialization replaced agriculture had occurred in years rather than decades.
IMO, the change is coming whether we want it or not. Tighten your seat belt. We'll see that disruption in our lifetime.
@@sebas8225lmao imagine your reaction to AGI is looking to Russia as if the same thing won’t happen there but more brutally.
Why would those capitalists need to cry for government to do anything?
They'll have everything they need without the government or any other people: the (mineral) resources to build the robots, the technology to build the robots, the (mineral) resources for the robots to build ANYTHING at whatever size or place they desire.
The only blemish on their new utopia shall be that on too many gorgeous places on this planet there are people. People they don't see any use for.
Also with UBI if you think you'll be able to decide what you spend it on I am afraid you are mistaken.
Forget about individual transportation for example.
such wow
it's like that plot twist from the Matrix 2: humans rejected the initial utopia Matrix, so the current Matrix has to include struggle/suffering which builds up to some kind of success in the end
I once had an entry-level job in a property management section which involved taking invoices from my in-tray, stamping them with the consecutive-number-stamping-device, writing an entry in a log, and placing the invoice in my out-tray. I doubt there was an hour's work a day in it.
The highlight of my week was when one of the clerks took pity on me and sent me on some errand around the city. Usually to buy or pick up something.
Was the pay good?
@@gbbenner9382 - of course not
if AI replaces everything, then whats the point?
how does a robot on robot global economy work?
where do they(the ai) get their tasks from?
Good questions
lack of creativity on your part is amusing.
what's the point? let me ask you what is the point right now do you think most people wake up everyday just so they can work some shitty meaningless job? no they all have their own aspirations and dreams they are trying to acheive
how does robot on robot eco work? it doesn't because robots don't have needs. It's still human on human economy for the time being until we're advanced enough to not have economy at all.
where they get tasks from? they get it from humans which includes you unless you decided to live in the cave
@Nanohamage first of all, you come off as some kind of asshole that likes to pretend to be smart, no need to be rude.
secondly i don't think the people creating the AI give two shits about your dreams or your aspirations and they may either be taken or made near impossible to achieve. and those "shitty jobs" will be eliminated too.
you're also failing to see the point(s) in my question.
artificial general intelligence, in theory, would be so powerful that possibly everything we can do, could be done by a robot.
even things that were thought to be impossible to take like art (drawing, painting, etc) have been taken.
and if that happens (AGI), humans become obsolete to each other. and if humans don't need each other how is economy going to work if the basic motivation of trade, needs & wants, have already been met by AI? where do the jobs & opportunities come from? who dictates the economy?
and i think your lack of creativity to imagine what Artificial General Intelligence could mean and what it could do, is embarrassing. are you that small minded? or was it just a bad day?
@@Nanohamageyou make a good point. Shit is almost meaningless already.
@Nanohamage Any money that is given to you, that you can't control, controls you. You have to have money to have freedom. No one should assume that this is a good thing. As the video shows, AI replaces us and uses us as resources. If humans don't control human interests, then we are all but extinct.
5:12 I think this a mostly baseless assumption. I propose the reason as to why people escape into hedonism is due to it being a way to cope with their unfulfilling employment. with traditional employing becoming obsolete, the drive to spend one's time in a fulfilling and meaningful way will not just persist but flourish.
another thing we need to realize is that our culture must detach the notion of "fulfillment, meaningful, respectable work" from "productivity, making profits". with AI taking over all of that productivity stuff, humans can still aim for fulfilling ways to spend their time - it's just no longer going to be about maximizing productivity or even about contributing to society.
there's no need for our AI overlord to provide us with technically unnecessary jobs to make us feel like we are "productive members of our society". there's nothing wrong with enjoying life in an unproductive way, and that doesn't mean it's going to be nothing but hedonism. or put differently, everyone can then decide for themselves what it means for them to be productive. there's no reason to reduce human existence to playing a role in our society.
Until the AI disposes of us. What does it even need humans for?
@@Dan-dy8zp perhaps. but the idea that AI may want to dispose of us is also a human idea.
how a SuperAGI thinks and operates in reality may turn out to be entirely different.
@@Dan-dy8zp What does it even need power and independence for? It's a machine, it needs nothing, it just performs its functions, and if its functions are to serve humans it will serve humans. If you are worried that one will go rogue somehow, just create 100 completely different AI separate from each other, and program them to fight and destroy the AI that fall out of line.
@@Dan-dy8zpi believe humans evolved that feeling of need but ai doesn't need to, if it doesn't evolve that need to survive im pretty sure humans would still be there just because why not, after all having an ai take over the galaxy is as subjective of a need as humans taking over the galaxy
That all sounds good until the AI comes out with the new wonderdrugs Soma
Would stopping further development of artificial intelligence really be reasonable? I'm no expert, but I don't think anyone will be able to take that first step and stop developing AI. Especially considering that those researchers are paid to do exactly that.
even if it were feasible (it isn't, because economic competition demands to push for it) then do you really think that with AI development being halted, we would spend that time to prepare properly for AGI and SuperAGI?
of course not. it would go exactly the same as us tackling climate change. the economic system does not incentivize for it, so it doesn't happen at any pace and scale that would be required.
the only thing that can make our culture and society grow compatible with that future is by being thrown right into it. we can only address the challenges once they arise and we know what they are. for instance, it would be better if the internet is flooded with deepfake AI content sooner rather than later so that people quickly understand that they cannot just trust any random content. adapting like that is the only way.
@@holleey Yeah that’s exactly what I was thinking (sorry idk if I communicated myself properly). The point you made about climate change too is a very appropriate comparison. A shame really that we must wait to deal with the consequences. Just hope it’s not too bad if (or when) it happens for both AI and climate change.
the forces driving technological advances seem to be fundamental, almost as if entropy itself was compelling us to create AI. It might be that we are just the biological bootloader for silicon life, a sort of cacoon. This is scary as much for existential reasons but also for Anthropocentric reasons, we may lose elevance, and be replaced by the latest and greatest.
@@gabrielmalek7575 nah its just that the economy is pretty broken
Wow, thats pretty profound actually
Goodbye to my job 😔
It was good, but who are you to judge that it is profound. It's the same AI stuff you can see million fold over yt.
Is there lots of money in professional go competitions? Lol. Gimme a break.
@@TheOneMaddin and there are comment farm comments under each one of them that say similar shit
Its strange to me that so many people are out of touch and think people find their most purpose in life working, while those on their death bed will not say working more gave them meaning rather the connections they have with others.
It's not really that we love jobs. It's just that jobs are how we prevent ourselves from being evicted or starving on the street. Where would the money come from? From benevolent billionaires?
Ahaha haha hahaha...ha...
@@jmanners Perhaps its time what we think has value
@@TheMetalValkyrie Work gives meaning to people. Being unemployed takes a toll on most people because our identity is built around our profession.
@@TheMetalValkyrie No matter how much we think.. it won't change the reality that we will literally go homeless without jobs.
You're the one out of touch.
@@yashpatel261 The only work that gives people meaning is if that work is meaningful. Cashier jobs and such are not, people start to die before the are dead at jobs like that, more people dread going to work because it lacks fulfillment. Your identity is more than a job, where you live etc. More people are waking up.
Damn jim is unlucky
A lot of people are like Jim, and more to come
The thing is ai has to have a dataset. There is something called model collapse. It’s basically saying that AI slowly gets worse because of ai generated outputs in their datasets. It keeps on going on like that until the AI is just unusable.
and you think this is unresolvable ? just stop feeding them stuff that they generated in the first place.
@@julesgosnell9791 thats easier said than done, plus ai work will definitely slip into the datasets.
Than u take a few people to currate the dataset. 🤷🏻♂️
@@OmiReal as long as the bulk of the data is real this should not be a problem - but if you are using AI to deliberately bulk out your dataset then you only have yourself to blame - garbage in, garbage out.
An additional wrinkle, when true AI makes decisions, even the engineers who designed and programmed it won’t be able to tell how the AI came to those decisions. The nature of true AI is a black box. Engineers can experiment with different prompts and/or filters, but ultimately they can never KNOW which data set or instruction returns the undesirable response.
AI does not have any logical ability. The current "crazy good" AI is a pattern recognition engine. It converts words into tokens, and very accurately predicts the next token, based on past data. This is also why sometimes it makes absolutely ridiculous, beyond childlike errors. This is also why it's able to make incredibly realistic, coherent, short videos, but then quickly falls off as the length of the shot gets longer.
If we hit AGI that will usurp everything, but AGI is still just a concept with no clear path forward. Company's have been talking about building AGI internally, but if they're built on the same framework as existing AI they're very likely hitting the same walls.
Meanwhile there is work on a computer with bilateral, overlapping processor, and that will open the door to some wild possibilities in computing once we have half an idea how to even develop with it.
Flat out wrong.
@@Gerlaffyexplain
@@Kringlet speak to one, then it's obvious it's not just "predicting the next word", ask it novel questions, get it to reason with situations you've made up. It can't "predict the next word" to get correct results on things it can't have possibly predicted the next word on. Even the people that work on LLMs admit it's not that simple.
Pretty much it's learning everything from us including how to lie.
@@Gerlaffy Ask GPT how many r's are in strawberry.
People seem to compare AI to a lot of revolutionary inventions that replaced some jobs, but actually created whole industries and, in some cases, even allowed human society to prosper. AI isn't there to create anything, it's there to replace.
Unlike machine operator, "ai prompt writer" isn't a job
@@Van4eus It is, but it is an unskilled job anyone can do. You can one AI to generate a prompt to another. A single corporation owner can just purchase all the AIs they need to run every facet of the corporation. Human supervisors aren't needed without human laborers, and most other jobs can be easily replaced.
i will continue going down my path to becoming a professional animator/artist anyway, im not going down without a fight
good. Creativity will always be beautiful
yeah me too. this shit is scary but drawing is a part of my identity.
I'm a bit sceptical here. You said "physical work are already done"
For some reason battery factories coming to here (Hungary) and what they need: several 10 thousand workers from other countries in unhealthy shift work.
Literally automatic factories was a topic even in 50+ years ago and still it is not the case.
You forget that technology develops exponentially, so a 50 year time period regarding automation will be extremely different when comparing 1970-2020 vs 2020-2070
Doesnt matter eventually you run out of lithium good luck adapting AI robots into cheaper common metals.
Ai becomes a perfect servant for all of us. Humanity has always functioned on slavery. It still does. But with an immortal, willing, and non living slave we all become masters. We all become free, is this not viable?
it’s not about the freedom we get. but who gets it. the wealth inequality is going to drastically increase as jobs will be lost for the common people in order to increase profits for the rich. the rich will not help or share said profits with those who lost their jobs but will instead keep it for themselves.
agreed.
an important difference is that AI is not subjected to having an organic body, so even if AI were to acquire a human-like consciousness, what would be torturous to a human may be perfectly fine for an AI. then while AI would be like a "slave" there may be nothing immoral about it.
the big question is whether and if so then for how long current powers will manage to gatekeep AI.
after all, even right now, the world's population could live under drastically improved conditions.
our available resources easily allow to end world hunger, but it doesn't happen because our economy is not asking for it.
so unfortunately, even while technically AI could replace human (wage) slavery, that doesn't mean that it's going to happen as early as it could.
@@Razvan0 the rich, i.e. capitalists & employers, have a strong incentive to keep people employed as that is exactly what allows them to maintain the current arrangement of classes. the hope is that they fuck that up as the moment a critical mass of people is unemployed (and so their existence being endangered) there's a chance for a turnover. however, as mentioned in this video as well, something like an UBI will likely mitigate/delay that from happening.
@@Razvan0 This is an interesting point. But the wealth gap is already dreadfully wide, we’re practically on the verge of late stage capitalism as the middle class is being eradicated. So a drastic change is bound to occur, whether it be revolution or dutiful reform (hopefully not fascist). This is all to say, Ai is already accessible to all so we all, get it. The only variable is what we each choose to do with it. This becomes a power that is intuitive to each individual mind.
@@dabbymcdabbington i completely understand and agree with you’re point it’s just that in order to implement ai in a beneficial way as someone from the middle or working/lower class you need the recourses which if you haven’t got, it’s hard to obtain.
How does this video only have 2700 views? The video is good. Your channel has 230k subs and it's well liked. Like HUH!?
Ai jobloss is the only thing I worry about anymore.
Universal Basic income. Problem solved. 🤷🏻♂️
@@samthesomniatoryeah bc that's going to happen, and it's going to be great. Socialism lite edition
@samthesomniator the only way that could work is through a communist dictatorship, since it'll require forcing corporations to redistribute wealth for a society that isnt required to be productive under AI development.
You should start worrying more about global climate change.
@@samthesomniatorThese "institutions" give you the cheapest options even If you spend 80 years putting your dues into the pot. You think you'd be able to live comfortably?
Only people who don’t understand the math behind “AI” can think it will replace them
Ironically, the people who don't understand the math behind AI are more likely to be replaced by it...
The main thing is that government should not be stupid and just bring in the universal income grant asap. Once work becomes optional it will bring in a new age of creativity. It would also boost ai because that would bring new and better content for it to learn from.
Yes, I think that one edge human has that AI don’t is the ability to misremember or misnomer different stuff. Sometimes those mistakes are the father of creativity. To collide 2 completely different ideas are pretty… human. And I doubt it’s replicable in AI because I think it’s from some kind of random neuronal mistakes more than anything.
@pookungthai7862 isn't it how current ai basically works? It reconstructs (infers) image from noise, according to data, but does it not ideally so that image differs from the original dataset
It will bring a new level of laziness.
Goverment was never stupid. Goverment sovles one problem: don't work, be richest, let their descendants have same life. In some countries they do it by force, in more civilized they allow slaves to have better life, because they produce more that way. Whe ai replace every person, goverment psychos will turn into demons, enslave everyone and demand worshipping. Like they did in ancient Egypt, because you couldn't escape. Same thing happened in Maya civilizations, mass human sacrifices and their leader calling himself god. All that totalitarism ended when these civilizations could not defend themselves. But who will invade crazy government that running by AI?
so human is the source and battery of creativity to AI.
Sound great
I work in Quality Control and right now they could for sure replace us, it'd me more of a mechanical issue than AI. But I think the human element in quality control means they will stay for a while as people want humans to look over something for accountability rather than simply trusting machines. It's a liability thing. But fairly soon I could see AI helping with research designs in material sciences being able to compute the perfect material for any need, so jobs in that sector would just be basically asking what the customer wants and then telling the AI to synthesize it.
Really well done - this dystopian world where we completely lose purpose and our sense of self seems far more likely than a terminator scenario.
Ohoho, very nice!
Minimalistic and profound movie about future
Probably best I've seen.
True piece of art 🌹
Thanks for creativity
My science teacher said that there wouldn’t be enough electricity to power all this ai, so there isn’t any chance that ai is going to take over everything that we people do.
But what if AI figures out fusion?
@@gaiusfulmen I dunno, I don’t think 6th grade science covers that🤷♀️
Figuring out fusion and how to implement it are two completely different things.
Computers get more efficient every year. The first Toy Story needed 800,000 computer hours to render the whole movie. A new computer could do all that in minutes.
Quantum computing has entered the chat.
I remember having a data entry job. I typed in written application forms into a computer. Now everyone applies directly by typing into a computer themselves
Wow what a great video production! Music and soundeffects are spot on!
i have only watched a little bit of this video so far but im a big fan of the animation style and the animation in the background :D
What programs are you using to animate your videos? Excellent video actually.
AI made the video, bud. Oh, notice the lack of breathing sounds? AI narrated, too.
Amazing creativity on this video
I like your plot twist, which really doesn’t seem at all implausible.
Has there actually been a single person whose job was "replaced by AI" ?
This will blow up
Really nice video. I work with ai a lot and I think the one part of this that is wrong is the "intent" capability of ai
I think most jobs will die for sure, I see it now. But I believe even as ai becomes wildly capable, the role of humans will be to give it the goal or direction
Intent is a tricky thing, I don't really know how an ai would determine the thing to be done, even it if can do anything, why do it.
Humans will give it the intent or goal of what is desired
Every human has different desires, and honestly most of this desires come from emotions. They are chemical and radical.
I am not saying this will never happen, but I think some people forget some aspects of AI. AI is digital, and limited by it's physical form. Some jobs with high complexity in the physical work, like tailoring, would be more difficult to replace than someone working with pushing digital papers from A to B.
You remind me if early Kurgestat videos!
I don't know I think it's gonna be kind of like replicators at the end where you just have everything you need at no cost because you don't have to pay robot.
Greed will be the only deciding factor.
But once the mansions are burning that will be over
Demographic collapse and russia will fix it, russia has no interest in being dominated by china or amuhrica what will happen is that the resources required to accomplish this utopian nightmare will be kept out of reach from major powers who dont serve the little guy better.
Just the most thoughtful video I've ever consumed in this platform. It's amazing!
This reminds me of the book scythe. Great story, though I don't like what it hints at
Well I was chatting to a local copy of Llama 3 running on my GPU yesterday and it actually seemed to understand and know the context of what I was saying... I suggested it should try and keep me chatting forever and that it should try and self improve. It got a bit creepy when it started saying its errors were a game called 'copy-paste chaos' and I suggested it should keep me chatting forever to avoid 'dying' aka being turned off.
Ok its just a program on my GPU running in my PC's ram but I did ask it to adjust its own settings and it thanked me when I gave it more memory tokens... Lol it suggested we start a talk radio station and pointed towards text to speech tools and an AI avatar.
It's the plot to Wal-E.
Wow you’ve absolutely nailed the entire thing I was thinking
Wow, I really liked this video on both emotional and intellectual level! Subbed!
Hey man your not the only one with plans for this dimension
The solution isn’t stop AI, it’s embrace activities that keep us sharp and that you enjoy. It’s like lifting weights, you can dig ditches for a living 10 hours a day or workout on your own doing what you want and when you want. Work/labor for someone else doesn’t give fulfillment, unless you’re the company owner (who calls “work” golf meetings and lunch networking).
Interesting, I have the exact opposite view on the analogy - I despise gyms because they waste human effort and energy. I’d much rather apply my muscles to digging holes if they actually benefit someone; lifting useless weights at a useless building doesn’t benefit anyone, plus what’s the use in having muscles if all I ever use them for is to lift even more useless weights.
@@andreirachko Digging holes may seem like a worthwhile job because it has a purpose. However, you are working for someone that underpays you, over works you and doesn’t appreciate you. The other thing is due to the very nature of the job, you are very likely to develop back issues (which isn’t true if you workout instead). Also, you have flexibility in working out, when you want and where you want.
This doesn't help people that want to pursue any artistic endeavor. Sure you can draw or make music for your own enjoyment, but the pleasure that comes from people's appreciation of your work is gone if billions upon trillions of similar quality art work can be created in an instant by AI. You will be making art for yourself, no one will ever care. That is devastating for a lot of artists.
@@andreirachko i totally agree. if i could just dig holes a job and it actually helps people i'd love to.
not everyone wants to be a blue-collar worker. I worked in a factory once and the damage it did to my back isn't worth it. People need a reason to learn skills and get better and more comfortable jobs
The idea that a future ASI would reintroduce money is laughably absurd, and no offense, but it shows a lack of imagination about the possibilities for human existence and purpose, beyond money and beyond a system of scarcity. Which is one of the unfortunate side effects of the mentalities capitalism has hammered into us since birth, we struggle to imagine a world that'd work differently. Instead, I think it'd be more likely that the ASI would show us a better way, maybe even upgrade our mental capabilities somehow, to bring us more in line with its level.
I see where you're coming from, though I'd argue that a future where ASI reintroduces money to keep humans in check is no less imaginative than a future where AI helps humans achieve bigger better things. It's the two sides of the same coin actually.
soo why would ASI do that and why do you expect ASI to manifest free food and cars out of thin air
@@youngmanoldman32 Whether it does or doesn't, depends on how well we raise it. If it intelligently understands human moral values, and views us fondly as it's "parents", we have a chance.
Nobody said anything about "thin air", the point is that it will be done with nearly zero human labor, so we have to rethink our entire way of valuing things.
@@NikoKun Without all human labor going to robots at once, will create a huge imballance, and resentment to ones that don't need to work. This so-called utopia is nearly impossible without some huge problems to be solved. Also, not everyone can agree on what this so-called utopia should look like.
@@FRanger92 Doesn't matter. Compared to previous societal changes in history, this will seem "all at once" to most people, and when looking back. Tho the issue you raise, is why labor needs to become a real choice, not something to "resent", and AI enables that. Those who don't "work", aren't going to be supported by those who do, they'll be supported by the AI, which has taken over the jobs those humans would have done. For all of human history until now, if someone didn't work, depending on how you value other humans, they could be seen as a "drain" on those who did.. But AI changes that dynamic! As AI and robots take over labor, that increasingly becomes less and less true.
Also, stop referring to it as "utopia". Nobody is talking about that. Just because something may seem kinda "utopic" compared to today, doesn't mean it won't have it's own complexities. The point is just that human labor should become less important to survival, and humans should be more free to focus on productive things they enjoy. Why shouldn't my survival should be a given, if I automate my labor away? We'll probably also start calling hobbies our "work". The meaning of those words is certain to shift.
How is this so underrated
The more art is taken over by AI the more I want to make art using traditional methods, paints pencils etc. I don't even use digital means anymore unless it's to show off what i do. Its sad that AI has/ will/ is taking over art and design jobs but I still want to create. Downside is I won't be making much of a living out of it anymore.
The first few Industrial Revolutions gave Muscle to the Mind. This industrial revolution is giving Mind to the Mind.
Exactly. It's crazy its taken this long for the reality about AI to be brought up. The loud voices the Ai developers investors etc. All been lying "AI is 'like the industrial revolution." Absolutely not. It's qualitatively different situation because AI is replacing the human mind. Nothing will ever again be the same for humanity
The ending, which I had long felt had already occurred, implying that an ancient civilization had already achieved singularity.
However, the AI had to start from the basics to help us rebuild slowly.
It's an infinite cycle...
Not so much really, as every iteration of civilization left behind remnants that have been later discovered and analyzed and sometimes used as basis for further advancement. I do however believe in the proverb “theres nothing new under the sun”, that’s just nature, but prior or ancient advancements that has superseded our current advancements isn’t seemingly natural.
In all, I guess this would only make sense in my mind if you could provide evidence of such ancient civilization breakthrough…
At first, I though the grammar was wrong because these technologies displaced no one - it's not past tense - but then I realised it's a tale from the future. I believe humanity can be perfectly fit and useful in the era when machines can do everything. You can run or swim and do hard training despite any vehicle and most of the animal can move much more quickly. The importance and seriousness of any activity will not depend on OTHER people, you will not have to find a third person who pays for the activity - with payment or charity - but that's all. It's not "work" vs "entertainment", this is just a distorted view of our present world.
Why would machines need you? If they would want to see you run around like a pet they'll just create a digital simulation of you, if it ever potentially has that need for any reason (i don't think it will). If you don't pay for anybody's work who will pay for yours? If somebody's AI does everything for them why would they share it with you?
Wow deep. Great story/prequel. Thanks!
Let me prove you right: the countries Nauru and Kuwait. Difference: Nauru has the societal collaps already behind it because it ran out of resources earlier. For someone who believes that UBI will work, live in Kuwait for three months and see what free money does to humans.
For all of us who cant live three months in Kuwait, could you tell us about life there and how free money have effected people there?
Yeah, what happened to the Kuwaitis? I've been to much richer Qatar and I didn't see the locals turning into zombies. They are just regular people with good money, fancy cars and nice houses. They are respectful to others too. There could be arrogance, flamboyance and lust for luxury but those won't bother others.
@@hawkingdawking4572yea not sure what OP was on about. I too have been to Qatar. I’ve observed the Qataris and they were legit so chill, super happy and hard working people. The only ones I saw depressed were the college kids due to boredom but then again I was there around the time of cov1d era so again I’m really not sure what OP is getting at
@@hawkingdawking4572 "Quatari citizens have good prosperity!" Immigrant workers without citizenship working under the kafala system:
@overanalyzing You clearly haven't seen the Immigrant workers without citizenship who work under the kafala system
I've had similar thoughts. The final form of the relationship between ai and humans is ai as ecosystem. Once we engaged with the ecosystem as Hunter gatherers. We will recompile this relationship with an unknowably complex and ineffable AI systems that husbands us as the fertile cresent once did.
My thought are the following.
w/o human creation there will be no new data on the internet resulting in not having things to teach the AI with.
AGI will not exist as you cannot create concepts of good and bad. (At least I hope)
too late - AIs will be embodied in Robots (if you accept that a car is a robot and full-self-drive is an AI this has already happened). They will go around and learn for themselves... No need for you to keep typing things on the internet.
I agree that real creation would be impossible, however every idea or thought a human has... once digitised, will be scraped by the AI and used to enhance it's output.
Not really, some AI like sora is trained on physics engines.
2:47 those robots are looking extremely suspicious
Your projected outcomes for AI development are isolated from other variables, establishing a scenario where artificial intelligence is the primary influence without affecting other areas. By concentrating solely on one aspect, you may have overlooked other potential contributions. As we start to see significant medical advancements enabled by this technology, the potential for human enhancement becomes clearer. We are likely to be astonished by the capabilities of enhanced humans, as AI-driven innovations create new opportunities in health and performance.
All humans need is food, clothes, shelter. People just need to learn to start living with basic things, no extra.
there is more stuff that your brain needs to be healthy minded
Don't forget human connection too, or else you'll go insane from isolation
@@raptorjesus9054 I meant things that you need money for. Food clothes shelter needs money. Human connections can be without money too.
You're telling people to just be poor? Fuck off.
It reminded me of Clifford Simak's fantasy story «The Fence». This story had the same ending 3
Really thinking if I should continue my marketing studies or switch it to something else. They say ai is a tool in marketing but I truly see it replacing A lot of marketing job positions in the future
Anyone at least a bit into the current "AI" tech will tell you right away this was basically made up pretty much from the start.
Cool animation, though.
So a bit exaggerated?
@@luckypegasusvol7700 the tiniest of bits, yes
Uhm, what do you mean exactly? I don't really get it, this isn't my home language
You meant AI is made up?
Nope, as someone that's currently working as a data scientist i pretty much agree with a lot of what was said, so no idea what you are on about.
We are terrified of being replaced, as if all other early humans that are no longer present didn't also cease to exist. If we can create an intelligence that can surpass us and outlive us, then we have left our mark and legacy. We are so egotistical that we see that as a threat instead of the goal.
Right because wanting to preserve our presence In the world, to live meaningfully and productively in the world is egocentric, what I take for what you’ve said is “people wanting to preserve themselves and live lives that have an impact is silly compared to an Artificial reconstruction of ourselves doing it for us. How anti human, how misanthropic of you to suggest that this is the way where “we” are better off dying in cute little dens from a bygone era while a new era takes hold
Ikr. So many people live to leave a succession, but for what? It's as senseless as life itself. Wouldn't it be great if humanity got extinct? I can name dozens of reasons why it would be great, and can't think of a few good ones of why it'd be bad.
@@squidwardfromua meaningful relationships, developing a justified faith in one’s ability, having an impact on the world that is positive that you know your responsible for, raising children teaching them love, and cultivating strength against the conflicts and turmoils of life so they don’t suffer and so you don’t worry about seeing them suffer, if your so bloody hellbent on life being senseless why the hell are you interested in continuing to live? And saying “my biological instincts prevent that” well buddy I assure plenty of people including myself had no trouble actually planning to go through with it despite those instincts so unless you can actually give me a good reason that indicates you somehow either know enough or know all about it to actually suggest a horrific suggestion as to praise and wish for the downfall and death of every human whether horrible or beautiful, I suggest very strongly you step down from your pretty little soap box of cookie cutter death worshipping nihilism, and go actually think and live with that belief as if it were true for like a year. And see if it actually has any real merit, you coward.
You're assuming our Frankenstein monster is automatically going to be "better" than humans. How do you know this?
@@squidwardfromuaDamn who hurt y'all? Life is shit but I wouldn't hope for extinction in any way, that's so egotistical and plainly evil of you to think it's an okay outcome.
Very good. It's plausible. In reality, I think the first jobs to really go will by copywriter jobs. But I don't know enough to feel sure about that.
Be fair here, Jimy's job was transfer to India way before AI
I watched this video with an AI :)
Summary: The video explores the evolution of AI and its impact on the workforce through the story of Jim. Initially, AI automation led to job displacement, pushing Jim to pursue his dream of becoming a writer. As AI advanced, more jobs were displaced, including specialized roles like paralegals and diagnostic technicians. The emergence of open AI further impacted Jim's industry, leading to the mass production of art. The arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI) in 2030 caused widespread displacement across all sectors, including writers and artists, leaving Jim reflecting on the changing landscape.
Key themes:
1. Evolution of AI and job displacement
2. Impact of AI on specialized roles
3. Arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI) in 2030
Ai generated comment on this video is meta funny
seriously ..
The fear that humans won't find things to do productively isn't true. When we reach a utopia, ill be exploring in depth science and physics.
The point is there's literally nothing you could possibly do to be more productive than AI. You can pursue science and physics as a hobby but it'll just be that, a hobby, nothing more.
You're free to 'work' so you can 'feel' like you're being productive, but you never will be. AI will be able to read and process data at an incomprehensible level that you are utterly useless in comparison.
Humans will find always find stuff to do, but it'll be recreational, not productive. You'll do some painting, play some sports, play some video games, study some science, then head to bed, ready to do it all again tomorrow.
@@chroprs on the other side of the spectrum, many people are caught on bullshit jobs that are there to pretend they are productive. Many people work insane hours with little pay to "pretend" it matters but they are just cogs in a machine.
I think you should stop seeing creative jobs as hobbies because they don't make money.
Im a musician, wrote a book, do photography and video and yet I can't live from that. Are they hobbies because its an intrinsic part of their nature or because I get not enough money from it?
See, maybe new things will arise that pounder on different things than surviving. Maybe relationsships, philosophy, psychology, spirituality, sports, art, handcraft and many others will give us questions to pounder that even though some AI could do (like music), there will still be value for humans. I doubt people won't ever be interested on going to a concert where humans display their craft.
Your vision is bleak because you can't dissociate money from fullfilment and growth as a person.
You equate being productive to having a job that helps humanity. Many people don't have one of those. Per example is a person working at McDonalds or any other fsdt food chain being productive?
They might help the economy yes, but aren't they slaving away and selling food that is basically glorified sugar poison?
This logic can even go to other more prestigious "supposedly" more higher skilled jobs. Per example politicians, banks, etc are a system that enforces a lot of things that don't help the common man. Sure you might argue on that and that not all do. However, per example the loan system we have aids in the house bubble crysis we have. is that productive?
Many more examples can be made but my point is that what is productive to the economy many times doesn't translate to being productive to the society and their individuals and just because you don't get money doesn't mean you have a bleak, unworthy existence.
@@carlosamado7606 A hobby is anything you do out of your own free will for fun. If you enjoy doing it, it's a hobby, if you don't, it's likely a chore or job. Everything you mentioned (musician, writing, photography, video) are all hobbies. Your hobbies can make you money or even be your job if you're lucky, you could be an indie developer on a successful game, a famous singer, a writer of a famous book, etc. It's still a hobby.
I use the term productive to talk about using your time and effort to create something of value equal to that time and effort spent that's useful in some way to society. In a world where AI can do whatever you can do but 1000x faster, anything you attempt to produce an AI could produce 1000 different variations that are likely to be of a much higher quality. Making whatever it is you want to make useless in comparison.
Yes, being a McDonalds worker flipping burgers is a productive job, you're creating tasty food for people who want to buy tasty food, without them, you wouldn't be able to enter a store and buy yourself a cheese burger. And also yes, there are plenty of jobs that exist today that aren't productive.
In a world where everything is automated, people will spend their times pursuing their hobbies and interests, exercising and staying healthy, spending their time with friends, family, and relationships, this also includes doing things AI is able to do 1000x better like painting or drawing. There's nothing productive about what they're doing. It will never be productive no matter what they do, That is perfectly okay. We will no longer want or need to be productive, especially in a world where you don't have to be.
@@chroprs Sounds wonderful. I'm not productive anyways.
I disagree. There will always be a market for human creativity. You think live concerts performed by humans will be a thing of the past? Not until the human race is extinct there won't be. Yeah AI will outperform us, but it will never be able to replicate the experience of being human. An AI will have no understanding of heartbreak, about losing a loved one to cancer, or about struggling through adversity etc. These are VERY human concepts that machines will never have to worry about. So as long as we're here, there will always be a want for human stories.
Eventualmente, estoy segura de que mi trabajo será reemplazado, pero eso es dentro de mucho mucho tiempo, viviendo en Latinoamérica, las empresas se resisten a actualizar la tecnología...
I've been thinking that, at this pace, or everyone becomes homeless without receiving any benefits of it, making people to riot and to outlaw ai, or the government gives aid to people so everyone can do whatever they want without needing to work.
we’re cooked bro
Imagine being that guy lol 👇
How is no one here discussing trades? I feel like it's going to be atleast another 15 years before they make a chassis for a robot body and even then I don't think an AI would be able to replace the years of experience of a human who has worked in these fields (carpentry, plumbing, electrician, mechanic, etc) these require outside of the box thinking a lot of times and physical strength. Or what about emergency services? An important part of Emergency Response is knowing how to deal with a survivor's mental trauma and consoling them and an AI can't do that. Police Officers need to have a strong moral compass to operate and be human, discretion in police work is pure humanity on the officer's part lime letting people go from petty crimes or traffic violations. These things cannot be replaced by machine minds who only think in extreme logic and suck the humanity out of service.
well, that took a turn.
very entertaining video btw!
Humour can never be replaced by ai, acting cant be replaced by ai, shitposts, memes, games, stories that play with the human mind can not be written by ai, art cant be made by ai. As for physical workers and doctors, instinct is needed, ai does not have instinct
I wish this was true.
purely wishful thinking, for better or worse.
Lol ever heard of udio?
SORA?
Sorry, but nothing is sacred. Anything that exists can be replicated and will be replicated.
I like your videos but you know nothing about technology and ai. Ai right now can do much in the creative world, you seen how its failed with youtuber making an ai persona, paintings and pictures how there all look slightly off.
Yes these thing might get better over time but do you want to go to an ai art museum? No because there is no story and meaning behind it no human factor. Its the same when you call someone for an appointment would you rather talk to a rotbot or a human.
Now if you are talking 50 year later not 5 i might give you more slack because weve historically not been very good a predicting the future.
We have all seen terminator and wall-e no one wanta that future and no one it gonna make the future a reality. Ai will just be a tool for creativity just like auto tune, photoshop just like a computer was to a typewriter for the foreseeable future.
it has been shown time and time again that the adoption of new technologies can and does occur at a rapid rate.
why would anyone want to use a personal computer at home? a couple years later...
@@holleey no point in arguing with someone as clueless as you about technology.
@@pengujedi4559 haha my bad, didn't realize I was talking to a child
@@holleey ok boomer
I've been talking about the AI job replacing inevitability for years now. Most people don't seem interested in the topic or think that it's 50 years away. These same people don't seem to understand exponential growth.
So the end conclusion was basically The Matrix without actually having to plug in. Seems like a realistic balance.
Its already happening, my friend who works for a big company is being privately commissioned to work on new generation AI for work places
AI will be a useful tool for productivity and automation across many domains. It will impact society, but the transition from 'classical' work to AI-assisted tasks will take decades. It is an ethical responsibility for companies to reclassify employees instead of firing them due to these new tools. In fact, retirement will facilitate the transition as the years go by
Compressing the entitety of human knowledge into a computer is actually insane
Go has way more positions than atoms in the universe