Hollywood is so over: The INSANE progress of AI videos
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
- AI video generation reaches new limits.
#runwaygen3 #aivideo #ainews #ai #agi #singularity
Thanks to our sponsor Video to Blog. Convert TH-cam videos into high-quality, SEO-optimized blog articles in seconds
www.videotoblog.ai/?via=ref
Newsletter: aisearch.substack.com/
Find AI tools & jobs: ai-search.io/
Support: ko-fi.com/aisearch
Here's my equipment, in case you're wondering:
Dell Precision 5690 dell.to/4cAYjSZ
GPU: Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada nvda.ws/3zfqGqS
Mouse/Keyboard: ALOGIC Echelon bit.ly/alogic-echelon
Mic: Shure SM7B amzn.to/3DErjt1
Audio interface: Scarlett Solo amzn.to/3qELMeu - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Thanks to our sponsor Video to Blog. Convert TH-cam videos into high-quality, SEO-optimized blog articles in seconds
www.videotoblog.ai/?via=ref
Number 2 is AI generated 0:28
You know dude, you can made your videos without insulting the hard work people put onto their craft, thinking they will be replaced by you writing a prompt, please dont do this in your videos is really offensive and indignant.
You really went on a tangent on the later part of the video that was really unnecessary, this is why people still hate ai bros.
feel free to use anything from my account as an example bro im a sub.
hopefully we'll be having something like kling by the end of summer
It's so funny that we benchmark AI's improvement via prompting Will Smith eating spaghetti 😂
It should be will smith slapping spaghetti instead ;)
@@josephastrahan6403 or chris rock eating will smith, lol
it's the 'hello world' of programming but to test the AI videos hahaha
@@krisstopher8259 haha yes :P
Spaghetti eating Will Smith is for video generation what Lena was for image compression 🙂 (e.g. when JPEG algorithm was tested)
This is what happens when you tease something like Sora and forget we're in the middle of an "AI arms race"
have to censor it so you cant have trump twerking!!
well said
Very true
I don't think they forgot, personally. I think they did it to see what the competition would do, and move forward accordingly.
I think it was too expensive to generate and it was costing OpenAI $100's a minute. So they would have gone broke if they publicly released it.
shows grandma with skin crawling around her face :is this real ?
LoOkS pReTTy ReAL tO mE
Yes it's real, grandma is very sick 😢
@@andregramazio3781early stage cancer sick
I just assumed all shots were fake lol
@@astralyd Nah the shot of woman driving the car looks way too stable to be AI, also AI vids are too smooth and have 0 camera noise which is a giveaway
i don't think hollywood is over; hollywood as we know is over
Hollywood is rapidly changing, or at least certain parts of it are rapidly changing. Video creation apps will be a major help to film makers, especially the ones who cannot afford to pay millions for special FX.
It will give power in the hands of indie producers.
Just imagine what kind of memes awaits for us!
We are not quite at that stage yet, but I can see over the next decade that many will be wondering, why watch Hollywood movies or tv shows when I or anyone else can create their own for free.
Better yet, using an existing show like Star Trek TNG and having A.I. create new episodes by it's going through all the episodes and understanding the arc of the actors, story and theme of the show and then creates new episodes with new stories that fit the narrative of the show, the possibilities are endless.
I know some will say, never going to happen, but if you looked at how much A.I. has developed in just 2 years, you can only imagine what it will be like over the next decade or few decades from now, and this could be very destructive to the creative industry, especially the ones that are not listening to fans as we see with Star Trek and how many are not happy with the current state of Star Trek, basically, we could get far more fan made shows on basically everything, that is a clear threat to the creative industry because of having so much cheap contents for viewers to use, it reduces the value of human made content a lot.
With all this said, for much of what I said above to happen, it will have to be a locally run A.I. model as online models will be too restrictive in what you can and can't do, and what I said above with the Star Trek thing, it's highly unlikely that any online model will allow that, but locally run A.I. well the sky is the limit.
@@paul1979uk2000 lol "decade", more like 1 year to 2 before the end of all creative fields, as viable businesses anyway. The money will be in cloud, how much compute power you have and how much you can sell it for. I agree cloud services will be more restrictive, but the majority will go to the cloud, and i think because of that there will definitely be a competition for what company has the least restrictions.
Tv drama and cinema has about 2 years left. We are probably within 5 years of being able to say to our ai phone, "Make me an 87 minute long film about a group of cowboys stepping through a time portal into prehistoric times.
Make it about their struggle to re-find the portal and survive the dinosaurs etc.
Create it in realistic cinema quality with the dialogue in American English.
Genre is action adventure."
Instantly, you have a Hollywood quality film that only you will ever see.
Ai has long promised a joblessness tsunami... who'd have thought it would start with Hollywood?
Drivers next.
I'm an electronic music producer and we spectated the same situation in 2000s when $1 billion cost mixing consoles in a special buildings were replaced by $200 cost software at your bedrooms.
In a 2010 you had complete symphonic orchestra under your fingertips.
And now you have even singing software which sounds extremely natural for just $150 and free LLM which can generate unlimited lyrics in seconds.
Yes, lots of jobs will disappear.
Some people (who explore new technologies and opportunities) will become very famous which wouldn't be possible for them without these technologies.
It's just how nature and the evolution works: people invent new tools and competition becomes more hard.
The difference is just in speed of changes. It took a centuries at the ancient times, but it takes just a year at present.
It's just a life ...
indeed , people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt , i know it's not simple but we don't have a choice really....
I'm here for augmentations and robo-prosthetics, the rest will fade just as quick as it appeared. The era of media consumption is going down faaaast.
@@user-fr2jc8xb9g ►people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt◄
Unfortunately, that's not the case.
We have a huge limitation on learning and the evolution of AI is so fasta we have no chance "adapting" and "learning new stuff" as any new thing you might learn AI can do better, faster and cheaper.
I agree with ya
There's so much junk produced now that no one even needs to learn to play a keyboard.
I remember when the Will Smith spaghetti video had people speechless
The generational leaps have been wild
Makes you wonder what they aren't showing us.
I hear ya re the if this is what’s public concern … I watched a modded flipper unlock 20 cars , change the wifi ssid , change tv channel, unlock hotel doors, clone a bank card with pin. In the hands of my 17 yr old nephew. What do “they” have .. if this is on Amazon.
who are "they"
based-on this; when Morpheus ask Neo
"what is real?" has aged flawlessly, and is up
Googleplex‼️🥶
Most of the AI video generators are slow-mo, so the 2 minutes in reality is 1 minute if you speed it up to normal speed
I haven't seen the full video yet, but the pianist doesn't wear a ring on his/her left hand while the mirroring image of the hand does.
good catch!
And the reflections of his hand occasionally move trough the wood onto the real keynotes.
The way the keys are pressed down tend to merge together, like the keys on top look pressed, but the ends of them look like one solid piece.
Also, fingers literally coming out of Mirror and pushes the keys
15:17 lmao this caught me off gaurd
The “hollywood is so over” comment finds me quite skeptical and I’ll tell you why: if you knew how many times we have to tweak all the components that go into VFX shots, from modeling to layout, animation, shading, lighting and compositing, not just because they’re not ok, but because they have to match a director’s idea 100% (aka pixel-fuc*ing), you’d realize there is no way this stuff can replace us. There is no way a director, let alone a producer, will be able to make a movie on their own or even with a limited crew, just using AI.
There will always be the need for people to enter prompts. So, if anything, this could become an extremely boring job, not nearly as exciting as making vfx shots. And eventually you know what? They’ll ask some compositor to fix the ai errors.
And there you go again… making movies (especially blockbusters) is an extremely complicated and laborious art.
Yes it will just you wait
It's not too far away.. I assure you within the decade.. they'll have it nutted out. And you'll never hear about the movie studios firing 100s of employees because of "restructuring"..
@@laurking6577 no it won't. Most people are just not very creative, so it'll still come down to creatives to create. All AI will do is cut out alot of jobs by streamlining the filmmaking process, and possibly make films more samey, concentrating profits for shareholders. You can't make a whole film using AI, it'll always be kinda shit.
i won't watch some generated garbage what's the point, I want to see something that took some effort
@@astralyd yes but very soon you wont be able to guess whats real and whats not
I have nearly 100% right. There are always small problems in the AI videos. For example does the hand in the mirror of the Piano sometimes reach out of the mirror. Faces often have glitches that don't feel right. Often reflections are to perfect, like in the spaceship. The only thing that really impressed me was the fireworks.
Thanks for sharing!
Just wait a year
@@DG123z Just wait a few months
@@Cznh Facts 💯 I was just trying to be conservative
The worst it's gonna be. Only getting better 🤯
Love how only a few months ago people are saying "ain't no way ai this bad stealing my job" and now here we are....
where?
it's still not anywhere near that point. And to be honest, it never will. All this will do is create a tool that actual professionals can use to add to their process.
Point being, random people with no experience in any given field of art where AI is "taking over" will not succeed. Even with AI, the only people that will succeed are the people that are passionate about those given art fields. Anybody who is actually passionate or interested in film for example wouldn't want to just use AI anyway, and anybody who isn't that kind of passionate to the point where they only use AI just won't be able to make a good movie, because obviously there is more to a film than just "producing a shot".
Basically, maybe AI can become a tool that artists can use to integrate into their workflow, and those people might beat out other aritsts who refuse to use AI at all, but without any actual experience in whatever art the AI is apart of, without the hand of an actual artist, the know how and skill to properly integrate the AI into their process in a way that is a means to an end and not the end itself, AI will not effect anything, and will never replace anything either.
i have yet to see ai do much beyond stock footage. When you can prompt human interaction at an emotional level things will become interesting.
Oh, so in a few months then?.
You already can
Don't know why people want to replace themselves with technology.
Book script to movie?
@@krunkle5136 its the next step in evolution! you see, humans are just too fragile and stupid and temporary to keep going
15:17 military boy throwing up his middle finger 😂
How cute that people a few years ago were saying actors will soon be obsolete. We're talking about the entire industry being obsolete soon. It just hit me that this may create even more of an echo-chamber effect with ideas and communication. We thought social media was bad. Wait until everyone will be able to create their own Hollywood movie based on their own personalized sense of values, ideals and ethics. I fear nobody is going to adapt and change with the times. Why would you when everyone can create their own reality? Scary scary thought! This is going to fuel isolationalism that probably may lead to even more conflict amongst those that have learned to be uncompromising through this technology.
Yup
Actors are real individuals and will always be more interesting. Leave your echo chamber
@@astralyd So are family doctors. But they will also be replaced .
Am I the only one who is not interested in closed source AI tools?
Kinda tired of paying to create legal training data for such companies. Especially when they do not share research papers.
And I must add that to create something actually usable with AI - you need to have actual skills and experience in that field.
Good for exploring concepts - bad as final output, and terrible if you need to change even a small detail.
OpenAI all thought sora would never release because of how good it is but all they did was get their competition to start working on ai videos, they are gonna release it with no limitations at this point because everyone else already has
Did they say this or is it just speculation? i don't get why they would assume that , I think they just thought they were ahead , not that no one would ever do it...
I knew it was real because of the mole on her chin driving
yes! AI characters won't have these flaws
The mole on her chin was driving?
@@UlyssesDrax She was driving with her chin, dummy.
Eye movements were my clue
@@UlyssesDrax if you feed it enough, yes
2025 is about to be wild
indeed
Rest of humanities future after the singularity. A new era.
Somebody gotta work hard to make 2025 wild
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
And the future of our society will be so fckin stupid💀
No way, I got everything right! Who else?
Same
I only got 3 wrong, but u can clearly tell it’s ai based in the movement.
Hollywood is like that guy whose wife left him for some guy named AI, and he thinks that once she has her fun, she will run back to him, but she never will.
AI Bundy
AI is not replacing hollywood at all
@@AlejandroFloresvargas-vf2qeWait 2 more years
@@AlejandroFloresvargas-vf2qe Copium is a strong drug; don't do drugs.
@@AlejandroFloresvargas-vf2qeIt will
My goodness! This is going break so many industries if this keeps up.
legal firms likely won't let that happen
It's inevitable.
it will only impact production studios that aren't making good stuff anyway.
I don't believe it will replace traditional film making. These tools will complement existing methods. But they will vanish many jobs in the field of advertising.
Give it 5 -10 years, entire movies from single prompts.
Ad agencies are done. All marketing and visuals are already starting to be done internally.
THAT'S THE POINT!!!!!!
@@richardbergin If you want mediocre slop then sure. The whole idea of a film being made from a single prompt is incredibly ignorant of how great films are made.
@@TheCreativeNickwith the right tools and prompt, your words will mean nothing soon. Always remember that this is as bad as AI is ever going to be
these AI still need training data and those data comes from humans. once the internet starts to be flooded by ai videos, they will essentially be feeding in their own data and scenes get stagnant pretty quickly
You know what is really frightening for the creative industry? We are only talking around 2 short years and look at the progress we have seen with A.I.
If this pace continues or potentially speeds up as we find more useful use cases for this tech, you really have to wonder where A.I. will be in 10 years.
The best thing that could have happened to A.I. is the hype train around it that brought it to mass market, that on its own is bringing in a lot of investment, ideas and pushing the tech far more than what we were seeing when it was just an experimental toy in some corporate lab, you have to imagine that as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, the ideas and investment could go through the roof.
Honestly, I pity the fools that think A.I. is just a fad or a bubble ready to burst, and yes, the bubble might deflate somewhat as things calm down, but it's clear as day that A.I. is here to stay and only going to keep rapidly get better, and far more interest and money is going to be thrown at it as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, in other words, we are only just starting, and that is exciting and scary at the same time.
What's really impressed me the most is how much better small open source locally run A.I. models have got, I remember just two years ago, the quality wasn't that great, and even thought there's still work to do, the quality on many of the A.I. models we can run locally on our computers are way better than just two years ago, and I really do wonder, how far can they push the quality for a given size model.
"Unrealistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a fork. ✅
"Realistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a spoon. ❌
Gymnasts are the new Will Smith
Finally, we do not need those expensive actors to make superhero movies
generally superhero movies sucks ngl
Gymnastics when you fly on your job application
Hollywood isn't over because though the progress might seem fast, the progress in actually controlling generative AI, video in particular is very slow, nearly nonexistent.I think this might be because in a way, AI itself is only responsible for the speed of development of the video quality. People are responsible for its customizability.
As far as visual fx technology, if it's not customizable, it doesn't really hold a candle to existing visual effects software. Right now generative video is helpful but it's basically loosely customizable stock footage.
They all look like AI other than some landscapes.
The first two were pretty easy to tell the sci-fi room was also easy to tell because AI typically likes to move the camera around like that. The girl in the fireplace was easy to tell because AI typically uses the same smile format when creating these kind of images, The concert was actually realistic until the last part were cloud made it look fake. The fakest one of them all was a sunflower girl and the old wrinkly lady. I caught the real ones because I feel like there was some reverse psychology going on and you pick something that would look easier for AI to generate
thx for sharing!
10/10 those uncanny frames can't fool anybody, I still don´t get why people is afraid of this technology, it got better yeah, but it still has a long way to look real.
.... "no need to hire a film team to make commercials".... thats literally the worst outcome... ppl deserve jobs, and with the way the economy is going, this is only going to hurt society more
Hollywood will only be over when faces and people are consistent and can be directed. Otherwise this is and immensely powerful tool.
The speed with which advances are happening, I'm guessing it could literally be a few months when this is solved.
@@abdulhai4977delusional 😂
We are literally months away from being able to create entire movies with AI. Meaning you can personalize them.
If only 50% of the videos are fake, that means I still get passing grade if I mark everything as fake
This technology is really impressive and I'm curious to learn more about how these models work, including how they were trained (we cannot forget about the actual artists whose work made these kinds of models possible in the first place!)
However, I disagree about how this will change Hollywood and traditional filmmaking in general. What many fail to realize is that the process of making art is just as, if not more important than, the result. They want to go from A to C as fast as possible, that they forget about B.
Traditional film-making is deeply rooted in artistic intention and vision. For instance, take music videos, which you pretty frequently in this video. The dance choreography is created by experts with actual intention in mind to match the song's rhythm, lyrics, and the artist's message. In narrative filmmaking, every single character expression, environment, piece of dialogue, keyframe, etc is made with purpose and direction. Directors and cinematographers carefully compose each shot, set designers build environments that help reflect the tone of the scene, and actors will refer to sensitive, personal experiences to better bring out dialogue. Even in animation, every keyframe is deliberately placed to convey even the most nuanced of emotions. Filmmakers and artists in general pour their personal experiences, emotions, and unique perspectives into every aspect of their work.
You could argue that using detailed prompts to "direct" the AI is the same as directing a team of actual filmmakers. However, unlike humans, AI lacks personal experiences, emotional attachments, or genuine understanding of the world. It's literally a machine, incapable of drawing from lived experiences or emotional depth to inform its creations. When a director asks an actor to convey a complex emotion, the actor draws from their own life experiences. Generative AI, no matter how sophisticated the prompt, cannot replicate this level of depth of human experience and emotion.
And I think portraying the need to hire actors, cinematographers, etc as a bad thing is pretty close-minded. We often forget how beneficial a collaborative environment can be. Working with people who all specialize in various fields allows everyone to pitch in their own ideas, their own experiences, and own spin to the film in a cohesive way. And if you just want to make a film all by yourself, you still can! You don't necessarily need to hire a whole team of people to make good films; there's numerous solo films on TH-cam that rival fully-fledged Hollywood blockbusters. It's more important about whether or not you're willing to learn and put in the work. If you don't want to put in any effort, don't expect a good result. I find the idea of relying entirely on a machine honestly quite sad, especially when you are more than fully capable of learning it yourself.
With that being said, AI just seems like a mock-up tool at best. There can definitely be valid use-cases for AI as an ASSISTIVE tool, but outright replacing all artists is simply unrealistic. Even then, a great filmmaker may only need a rough, 15-second storyboard drawing to envision it on the big screen (such as Rian Johnson's infamous Knives Out storyboard drawing!).
Also, the last thing I want is to have TH-cam be flooded with automated AI music videos or films made by people who just want to make a quick buck.
We all know it but it will get to a point when it can replicate artistic intention and vision
Things are going so crazy... In the near future, most people will believe that nothing is real.
early AI: no one thinks it's real. mid AI: most people think it's all real. late AI: no one thinks anything is real because AI is everywhere
😅xd, la gente aún sigue creyendo que Josh peck, murió y fue remplazado por un doble
What a great prospect, so you're all excited about it? what's wrong with people? sigh
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
Hollywood has been in decline for many years, and I think that this could mean it's final end. For far too long, Hollywood has dominated the viewpoints that are presented in society merely because it has access to the massive infrastructure that making films traditionally required. But now that films can be made by anybody with access to a computer, I think we're going to see a much wider variety of films made for many different viewpoints and tastes.
good to get rid of woke hollywood
I always said it and will always say it:Many people seem to think that AI is just another tool that won‘t replace much stuff, but AI WILL improve constantly and it is about to catch up to our abilities.
Well, I just have to acceptthe death of my animation job
GG bro. Now go save someone life and be a doctor or something
Good luck with getting a decent residence
For now just keep doing as a hobby or side activity. Remember, sometimes you create because you love to. And who knows, maybe it’ll be a rare skill that people want, since everyone will be too lazy
Called it a while ago. Hollywood is toast, everybody will create their own movies at home and share them on youtube or elsewhere.
Same with games, books, music, truth
@@dasistdiewahrheit9585 People can already do this with books. Using AI, while it still takes a long time. Is not as dreadful and painful.
@@ThanosDestroyeryearsago A long time? I get at least 20 token per second out of locally running 8B models.
No one's going to care about AI stuff eventually. Humans get bored really quickly and we want to be part of what everyone else is doing.
@@ThanosDestroyeryearsagoterrible books.
shows videos in 240p resolution: is this real?
So there's this whole discussion about AI programs stealing art, but I'm genuinely curious just how much extra material Kling has taken compared to competitors to make their generations as accurately good as they are.
You can still tell to a degree with elements of unrealistic or repeated motion . Hair & clothing for example.
For a second there I thought you were identifying every black man eating spaghetti as Will Smith. 😄
These AI generators often have policies to not generate real people, so people are generating the closest thing to Will Smith eating spaghetti.
We are a maximum of 12 months from naked eye perfect AI generated video. We are approaching "good enough" video even more rapidly. The biggest threat is to those creatives who make up the most routine parts of the creative craft. Those 60k-75k jobs that are held by the persistantly mediocre are under threat.
I could tell the piano one was AI, because the reflection of the hands in the piano were delayed by half a second.
You know it's especially fake when you have to question "why the hell would someone take the time to professionally film something like that?".
There's no direction anywhere in the AI generations. No begginning Middle and end.
16/17 no way i got the last one wrong :(
When you know there is a possibility of an AI generated content its super easy to spot it, but if you just showed me those videos without context i would not be able to tell at all
thx for sharing! the last one is tricky
Definitely i have lower score, but last one i started to thought about AI by looking on boots. For me it's was kinda weird motion blur.
One thing to consider about Runway Gen3: its pro plan gives you unlimited generation in Gen 3, and the time it takes to run generations in Explorer mode is really about the same as the generation time using credits. If you are using the service commercially, and charging clients for your work, this actually is a great deal. Also, Gen 3 works with Lip Sync allowing you to make MV with actually singing.
The piano one was kinda obvious because the reflection had a ring but the original hand didn't
Being amazed at first with all this AI video hype, now I am a bit more sceptical. Mostly because those are still single footages. Maybe it can work in some ads where you don't really need to follow any detailed script, just put some random shots in between the frames. And only when there are no people in the scenes, because they still look very "off". But in Holywood? C'mon, let's be real. Producing a movie, a music video, an animation - it is really much more than promting some random videos. You need to have so much more control over the footage. I animated couple of cartoons and can't really see ANY advanteges in using AI. It is really very detailed work, where you hove tons of layers stacked on each other, with many effects, masks, everything is heavily keyframed. So at the moment it is really nothing more than a extended version of stock videos market. Will see how it will develop in next years. For now - just a toy.
I thought it was horrible and distopic and now I think it's still horrible and distopic.
Everything about this is evil. There is nothing good about lazy unskilled people gaining instant gratification from generated movies.
Okay, dont use a car then... Actually dont even use an computer... What you said is so stupid it's actually insane.
@@aclutchboy5389 he's right, your comparaison make no sense
@@astralyd well, there is nothing good about lazy people driving, when they should have walked. Thats undeserved convenience they should not have, it makes them weaker...
All this "instant gratification" talk reminds me of the manosphere nonsence floating around lately.
2D Animator here...
waiting for the "animate" button.
put the charcater rotation and write the action.
1:06 "And then we have this scene which seems like it is from a sci-fi horror movie. [...] Do you think this is real?"
Well I don't live in a sci-fi horror movie... not yet at least. So I guess not?
me trying to find a chinese friend but not finding one.
😭
move to china
Go to China Town :v
There was a glitch in the old wømen when she moved that gave that one away, some others too had something that gave them away but overall these were extremely believable. I’m doubting ppl that say they got them all right, at least if you just watched the videos once.
The second video (the young guy near a beach) has a glitch with the water. AI doesn't animate water well.
And the fireworks video was not seamless.
0:23 - Two guys on the beach merging into one person. A hand with a thumb where the pinky finger should be. "I don't know about you, but this looks pretty real to me"
I got most of them right because I was looking out for the mistakes, but as time goes on I might not notice something is AI because I'm not looking out for it.
*I see why you have so many subs, you came in with the sauce. You mentioned all of the websites and how to use em, very detailed for novices. Thanks*
i think it would be cheaper to build a agi agent let it use the other gen ai tools and media tools to create final product, instead of hoping single gen ai model to create full length movie at once.
Bro kept asking if "it's real" every 5 seconds. 😭😭
Interesting one is number 16 because you can instantly tell it's Ai generated. The reflection is wearing a ring, while the person playing the piano is not. Also position of the hands doesn't quite match up. Reflections are REALLY hard for AI to do effectively.
This was exactly why all those Hollywood peeps went on strike a few months back and insisted on AI be locked out out of content creation.
Nice to see that they will be completely discarded as both obsolete and expensive.
At this point, you're being one of my most important sources to AI news!
Your commentaries and thoughts about the field are always on point
Thanks!
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
This comment took the words out of my mouth, I think so too, or rather, it took my fingers off the keyboard, right?
@@veenasuresh7054 They said the same thing when cars were replacing horses. Or when agricultural machines were replacing farmers. It turned out that the human productivity exponentially multiplied itself.
i legitimately can't tell with half of them
That Luma gymnastics nightmare does look compelling in a way. Imagine if someone took that as reference to create an animation. Would be totally wild.
am I the only one that guessed it all correctly? like there's so many clues in there.
I got one wrong, the woman driving , only because looking out the window objects appear but agreed, soooo many clues
remember, you are fully focused on getting it right with hindsight of a test, others will not pick up on it that aren't as primed
3:22 how's real? How? Her nose tip moves out! Literally, you can check it by yourself!
4:24 Reflection touching the real keys, that must be real
Maybe she moved a muscle that did that, also the reflection of the ring isnt showing with the piano guy
4:24 no ring on the hand while there is a ring in reflection.
@@Ultimine1 If was only for the ring, it literally goes toward the "real" keys to play ahhaha
14:19 cling looks awesome and pretty much better than anything pixar has done in their entire existence
Always remember! It's not what it can do now, it's what it can do in 6 months from now!
imagine a year from now or 5 years. a decade from now there will be 100% realistic AI CGI models in VR and even whole games
2:16 Ring in reflection, but not on her actual finger.😋
Good catch!
good spot
The problem people miss is that you’re always going to need great quality videos in your training data. And humans need to do that. And not any humans. It requires skill. Often years or decades of skill in cinematography
A lot of those real videos may have been enhanced by programs even if not A.I. generated. Reality has been slipping from us for some time now.
I got about half of them right, half wrong. I will point this out though: this doesn't replace hollywood, you can't replicate these scenes from different angles properly to make a cohesive scene. Also there's little contextual details that can give it away still. but yeah it has got really good.
Idk I’m scared
Be scared if they just use it for BS like this such as art/entertainment, Be optimistic if they pull their finger out and actually use A.I. properly for research to find cures for diseases.
YEA! YOU SHOULD BE.
@@livlaughlove4646 you’re clearly a killer AI robot trying to warn me
Don't worry I'll hold you we'll get through this together
The democratizes film-making finally. We will all be able to tell stories.
yes!
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
@@veenasuresh7054 Not sure I fully understand what you are saying here. I would use this to create a story/film and then have people come in and give feedback and go through an iterative process making revisions until people felt it was successful. And then show it more broadly.
@@gregblank247 Yes, man uses his ability and energy to do any work. The effort and time given by each one decides his future life. So, if you are taking a little time to make a video through ai, that's fine. But remember that anyone can do the same things. How are these videos going to impress others? Who will value the time you spend,Remember that all humans are given only a certain amount of time to live.
For example, you can understand and enjoy a character who acted beautifully through artificial intelligence in the movie. It may be possible at first, but the doubt is whether it will continue. Will the acting Oscar go to the person who created the ai character?
One more example, an advertisement made with ai shows a model enjoying a drink, can you consciously accept that ad? Who will you believe and how will you live in a world where anyone can spread such advertisements so casually?
@@veenasuresh7054 We face those issues right now. Ads are all fake - not to be believed. And the abundance of choice means we all need to curate everything. If I use AI to tell an amazing story - word will mount. People will share. If it has value people will gravitate
I was shocked when he said the second fireworks video was real at first. I was like no way, the smoke and firework patterns are the same on both sides. 🤣😂
The firework one impressed me the most 😂
As someone who used runway gen2 to make a lot of videos I think you are seriously underselling it.
I got like 2 of them right. I'm kinda scared that humans have litterally brute forced their way into creating something designed to deceive them. Like isn't that absolutely terrifying that AI could litterally be deceiving us every day without us even knowing
I like the spot the difference game. Number 16. Hand in reflection has a wedding ring, but the real hand doesn't. AI is imagining a scenario of a spinster serenading herself dreaming she was married 🤔
It is like a party all the time! Because they come up with different themes like: deep tech week, gen AI week, open source week. I have been to Cloudflare, Notion, Gusto, Coinbase, Microsoft reactor, MindsDB, Cleanlabs. And all of them have speakers from Transformers paper like Ilia Polosukshin. Out of them all I want to meet Mira Muratti, marry her and have kids with her! 😂❤
Realistically, I think actual legit music videos could be highly subsidized with AI video by next year. And before the decade is over, individual in-home directors could rival hollywood on the full length movie/TV show front.
Regardless of how real individual shots look, for a prolonged movie with multiple shots, scenes and dialogue, you need consistent characters and objects to behave the way you want them to (anything from staging positions in a house to a car chase through a city), having consistent clothes on, in a consistent environment with consistent lighting and consistent camera angles, with at least believable mouth movement for the dialogue. I think it's going to be a while still, but not like decades away, just maybe 3 years or so.
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
Can't wait for the Terminators who can access anyone's post history and find out if they were an AI hater, then respond accordingly.
"Are you @SarahConnor1982, your opinion is wrong!"
Well they will see my comments praising them and just reward me 🗿
shockingly i only got the two concert videos incorrect
Two and a half minutes in, and pretty much all of them look AI asf. So much twitchiness
I think movie industry is going to evolve, and not erase jobs but rather let the cream rise to the top. I’d be terrified if I was in a position that wasn’t earned by true talent or skill
shows hands playing piano and the person playing is ready to cheat on the partner as the ring is in a Schoringdinger paradigma!
9:29 I used to think I was A.I generated until I step on one of my kids toys. The Pain was Very Real.😢
Honestly the only videos I couldn't identify as AI were the ones that we already expect to be super digitalized and edited, like both concerts, the out of focus landscape view with the sun ray into the camera, the fireworks and the Sci-fi one. Of course we are going to confuse those ones, since their "real" equivalent are not natural to begin with. If it was a video of people on the concerts, a regular HD landscape view, fireworks with a background or people for reference and a non futuristic, non scifi bit, I believe I would get all right. Every AI to this day has that super saturated, bright hue like it is post edited and there is always inconsistent in details, a person that disappears inside a wave, reflection that makes no sense, lifeless smiles and eyes, over the top architecture, jittering movement on surfaces or skin that should be still.
It took me a minute to realize MV meant music video. Is that where we're at now? We can't be bothered to say music video anymore?
A bunch of New Entertainment companies about to pop up like crazy
Think the biggest thing you're missing is where are the hooks and controls? Why would anyone use this in any industry without being able to control every aspect of the scene?
you can control camera movements via the prompt. you can also control character expressions & talking using this new tool th-cam.com/video/uyjSTAOY7yI/w-d-xo.html
@@theAIsearch You can do this in 3D programs without AI and have full control of the scene. You can't define everything in a text. At best it will be a tool that can get you boiler plate scenes that don't require much complexity or design. From this I don't see how people would lose their jobs, when literally you can just have someone eat spaghetti on a green screen, then fill in a background you have full control of. I guess if the objective was to emulate known people or take peoples existing art styles and apply it as a test scene, or a previs, then I can see the purpose.
For the most part from what I see from AI at best is good composition, and post effects on something not that hard to render. But I think people are getting a little lost in because you can emulate people that somehow its more than what it is.
Not gonna lie, this had the “all of the above” vibe 😂