Hollywood is over? Give me a break.... Make a movie like Hitchcocks "A lady vanishes" and make it wittier, more captivating, more suspenseful and more charming in a good old British way. Have fun and come back to me when you're finished. As for Hitchcock original that was shot in six weeks and you have the same amount of time.
@@astralyd Nah the shot of woman driving the car looks way too stable to be AI, also AI vids are too smooth and have 0 camera noise which is a giveaway
Been in the CGI industry for over 20 years. Took many many years for CGI in movies to start looking really really good. Ai is doing it in an absolute fraction of the time. My industry has already been effected by it. Concept artists are one of the first to get hit. Employers will hire someone to do a few images then they will let that person go and run those images through Ai to get many more variations. I've worked at companies that specifically signed contracts saying they won't use Ai but they still did, mainly for internal concept art.
Anyone else notice how all the AI human movements look like they're animated? Especially head movements. Quick, sudden movements between static poses that they stay in for *just* too long.
Perhaps they animated a bunch of motions with cgi models and used that in the training data, or have them used to generate control nets when they're generating the video.
people are blind to it-captivated by the shiny, new toy. but what lasting value will this truly hold? when anyone can create a video with a few words, where’s the passion? the craftsmanship? without hard work behind it, it all becomes hollow, just mindless content polluting the internet. there will be nothing left to marvel at, no art from skill or effort, only empty spectacle. imagine a 5-year-old can whip up hollywood-level vfx in minutes-it's the death of creativity, a world where video content becomes as uninspired and disposable as cars rolling off an assembly line.
I wouldn't stress it too much. No matter what,.. it was all a matter of time 👌🏿. It was inevitable. But... The Human brain canvgenerate a trillion thoughts per second, and are prone to making mistakes at first, but then creating laws as we evolve. 👌🏿👌🏿👌🏿 AI cannot create a Stephen King book, or act like Denzel Washington. It has no soul behind what it creates. It's almost the equivalent as man trying to create something as beautiful as God's creations...Lol, it's just not going to happen 👌🏿
That's why I don't think we should concern about AI. It's a toy, it also can be a good tool to help to show the basic idea fast, but it won't change the main thing: people will always value the handcraft, the time and effort of a real human spend and put into his piece of art (or work). I even think that AI can increase the value of a real human work because it becomes something rarer and more valuable than ever.
I have nearly 100% right. There are always small problems in the AI videos. For example does the hand in the mirror of the Piano sometimes reach out of the mirror. Faces often have glitches that don't feel right. Often reflections are to perfect, like in the spaceship. The only thing that really impressed me was the fireworks.
The funny thing is AI always portray something too nice and too clean like it's staged. It's like they can't even program it to understand how messy and dirty real world should be.
@@wdp183 Nah, this is just the infancy, it'll take some time before AI could definitely replicate reality without having to rely on already existing material.
As someone who studied AI for a long time, this quiz was too easy Don't look for what's real, look for what's fake Here's the basics of what was wrong with every AI video: 1 - Hair is too stiff, flow is unnatural 2 - People in the water merges then disappears 4 - Buildings floating in water 5 - See the "remains" of an explosion, except that explosion never happened 6 - Her left eye becomes almost entirely black 8 - The holes in the panel hanging on the left side completely disappear 11 - The phone screen doesn't entirely match what's happening 12 - She has a necklace but no chain around her neck 13 - The wave on the right dies out but then comes but twice the length 14 - Her face is generating as it zooms out 16 - Reflection of hand is emerging from the back panel, black keys disappear for no reason 17 - People sitting right behind other people on the right side, way too close Oh and also every AI video is around 240p for some reason
As someone who never studied AI, I've got almost everything right. Interestingly, the woman in the field of sunflowers looked real to me, but I realised that these are SUN flowers not "looking" towards the sun
these AI still need training data and those data comes from humans. once the internet starts to be flooded by ai videos, they will essentially be feeding in their own data and scenes get stagnant pretty quickly
If there was no noise then yeah, it would get stale very quick. But there is noise and weight decay, meaning things can always change. This gives some robustness to the model. In due time I'm certain that TH-cam or a similar video platform will start experimenting with AI models generating videos that are trained off of views, likes, and comments, aka others' attention. Training data will still very much be abundant even if the data is predominantly generated by AI.
@@yerpderp6800 "Just add noise" -the lukewarm IQ I think you don't understand what OP said there. AI feeds off videos to learn from. If you don't have any videos, and it's all AI generated, and those AI generated images are set to a learnt thing, they will produce the same result over and over. Nothing will change or improve, because AI doesn't have imagination or the ability to "walk around and film a scene".
@@mercedesf1fan176 hype is because it went from the first thing to this in what, a year? how's it gonna look like in 5 years??? the progression curve is crazy
'You don't need to hire actors, build sets, visual effects specialists. You don't need to hire musicians to write songs.' This is taking the humanity out of creative expression.
Disagree. Only if the given tech restricted the artist from expression would this be true. But as long as the artist can say no to his work and change it as said artist pleases than no humanity is taken. On the contrary, now even a low income person should be able to create block buster films or whatever form of high quality art media they please.
I used to fear that but now I think AI will be integrated into existing processes/workflows and popular demand will prefer the human touch (e.g. a real human singing) but also the vastly new sounds that AI could offer. I now think when it comes to this type of AI, things won't be as bad as people think. As for artificial general intelligence, though, that does concern me as making AI conscious is scary.
@@pizzahot133Exactly, AI is still in its infancy, I can see in a decade AI having the ability to follow an Artist's vision precisely, we just aren't there yet.
Thank you for commenting this I was so upset to see literally nobody else upset with the way he's bashing all the people whose jobs it is to create the things he's making with ai 😭😭 like have fun with it yourself man but it seems like you're actively trying to get these people fired
I remember when the Will Smith spaghetti video had people speechless The generational leaps have been wild Makes you wonder what they aren't showing us.
I hear ya re the if this is what’s public concern … I watched a modded flipper unlock 20 cars , change the wifi ssid , change tv channel, unlock hotel doors, clone a bank card with pin. In the hands of my 17 yr old nephew. What do “they” have .. if this is on Amazon.
@@eliadmusicthe elites, basically people with billions of dollars mostly from generational wealth that i wouldn't say "control the world" but are on par with the government because they give the funding.
Hollywood is rapidly changing, or at least certain parts of it are rapidly changing. Video creation apps will be a major help to film makers, especially the ones who cannot afford to pay millions for special FX.
We are not quite at that stage yet, but I can see over the next decade that many will be wondering, why watch Hollywood movies or tv shows when I or anyone else can create their own for free. Better yet, using an existing show like Star Trek TNG and having A.I. create new episodes by it's going through all the episodes and understanding the arc of the actors, story and theme of the show and then creates new episodes with new stories that fit the narrative of the show, the possibilities are endless. I know some will say, never going to happen, but if you looked at how much A.I. has developed in just 2 years, you can only imagine what it will be like over the next decade or few decades from now, and this could be very destructive to the creative industry, especially the ones that are not listening to fans as we see with Star Trek and how many are not happy with the current state of Star Trek, basically, we could get far more fan made shows on basically everything, that is a clear threat to the creative industry because of having so much cheap contents for viewers to use, it reduces the value of human made content a lot. With all this said, for much of what I said above to happen, it will have to be a locally run A.I. model as online models will be too restrictive in what you can and can't do, and what I said above with the Star Trek thing, it's highly unlikely that any online model will allow that, but locally run A.I. well the sky is the limit.
@@paul1979uk2000 lol "decade", more like 1 year to 2 before the end of all creative fields, as viable businesses anyway. The money will be in cloud, how much compute power you have and how much you can sell it for. I agree cloud services will be more restrictive, but the majority will go to the cloud, and i think because of that there will definitely be a competition for what company has the least restrictions.
Tv drama and cinema has about 2 years left. We are probably within 5 years of being able to say to our ai phone, "Make me an 87 minute long film about a group of cowboys stepping through a time portal into prehistoric times. Make it about their struggle to re-find the portal and survive the dinosaurs etc. Create it in realistic cinema quality with the dialogue in American English. Genre is action adventure." Instantly, you have a Hollywood quality film that only you will ever see. Ai has long promised a joblessness tsunami... who'd have thought it would start with Hollywood? Drivers next.
OpenAI all thought sora would never release because of how good it is but all they did was get their competition to start working on ai videos, they are gonna release it with no limitations at this point because everyone else already has
Did they say this or is it just speculation? i don't get why they would assume that , I think they just thought they were ahead , not that no one would ever do it...
@@AfifFarhatithey basically said this but op is exaggerating a bit, they were worried about its release for a lot of reasons and legal reasons I don’t really want to all name. and they even delayed it so they can add safety measures, but once they released it you know what happens from there lol
the telltale sign of ai in people is the skin on their face. No normal person has close to perfect skin ever, like the two clips of the real women had imperfections like pores and moles but the ai generated guy and girls all had glowing skin.
Consummers dont car about this. Mainly because it's been years since movies were made with passion, like tell me, are the new star wars, marvel, avatar, disney movies really made with passion ?
@gorfousenpai4860 They're at the very least made by artists, they have something behind them, AI doesn't, it is antithesis of art, and the death of it.
I'm an electronic music producer and we spectated the same situation in 2000s when $1 billion cost mixing consoles in a special buildings were replaced by $200 cost software at your bedrooms. In a 2010 you had complete symphonic orchestra under your fingertips. And now you have even singing software which sounds extremely natural for just $150 and free LLM which can generate unlimited lyrics in seconds. Yes, lots of jobs will disappear. Some people (who explore new technologies and opportunities) will become very famous which wouldn't be possible for them without these technologies. It's just how nature and the evolution works: people invent new tools and competition becomes more hard. The difference is just in a speed of changes. It took a centuries at the ancient times, but it takes just a year at present. It's just a life ...
@@AfifFarhati ►people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt◄ Unfortunately, that's not the case. We have a huge limitation on learning and the evolution of AI is so fasta we have no chance "adapting" and "learning new stuff" as any new thing you might learn AI can do better, faster and cheaper.
How cute that people a few years ago were saying actors will soon be obsolete. We're talking about the entire industry being obsolete soon. It just hit me that this may create even more of an echo-chamber effect with ideas and communication. We thought social media was bad. Wait until everyone will be able to create their own Hollywood movie based on their own personalized sense of values, ideals and ethics. I fear nobody is going to adapt and change with the times. Why would you when everyone can create their own reality? Scary scary thought! This is going to fuel isolationalism that probably may lead to even more conflict amongst those that have learned to be uncompromising through this technology.
You are right in one point: It will get stale. When everything is AI generated, and AI learns from what we feed it, then it will generate the same things over and over - with only mild differences. If you think this will take out an entire industry you are sorely mistaken. The advent of CG art didn't take out actors, but what it did for sure was take out any sort of real movie - where people act around props, rather than an empty blue room later filled in with CG. What you can always hope for is more slop to consume. AI does a great job with this, or rather: The prompters are doing a good job fulfilling their own empty desires.
BEST take on this so far💯. Humanity wasnt ready gor social media and look at what that did...we're finallly experiencing the fallout. Now 10 years later they're making AI
Am I the only one who is not interested in closed source AI tools? Kinda tired of paying to create legal training data for such companies. Especially when they do not share research papers. And I must add that to create something actually usable with AI - you need to have actual skills and experience in that field. Good for exploring concepts - bad as final output, and terrible if you need to change even a small detail.
Eh, the last statement depends on the progress of other tools. You can make some decent effects with reference pictures and ai video now, maybe not something that is 100% accurate to the source, but for certain work (like effects) it doesn't need to be. Same goes for models if we are talking about 3d mesh generation through 2d images or 3d video. Eventually, you obviously still need expertise in the given field. But it being bad for final output and terrible for transformation is not necessarily a rule.
I’ve worked in the Georgia film industry for the past 8 years. It became apparent during last year’s strikes that the major studios were holding onto the freedom to use AI with a death grip. It makes sense when you think of the costs they can eliminate just by generating what they need rather than hiring and logistically supporting a much larger crew to do it for much higher costs and in a much longer timeframe. In just a short span, I’ve also noticed this incredible leap in AI technology and realism. You can’t tell me those entertainment juggernauts and their shareholders aren’t absolutely pouring money into this tech’s development. I love what I do, but I see this train barreling down the tracks towards us. I’m currently changing careers to a trade that will still need humans for a good while longer.
"Unrealistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a fork. ✅ "Realistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a spoon. ❌ Edit: thanks for 100 likes
I don't believe it will replace traditional film making. These tools will complement existing methods. But they will vanish many jobs in the field of advertising.
@@richardsrandomadventures If you want mediocre slop then sure. The whole idea of a film being made from a single prompt is incredibly ignorant of how great films are made.
In 2024, many AI generated trailers look like they're all in slow motion and morphing, so that is a major hurdle to overcome. But if it won't take long to improve, then AI Filmmaking is just another form of competition with varying results. Creating art the traditional way with learned art skills will not go obsolete, speaking as an artist.
Precisely. And people who make traditional art shouldn't be afraid. If you make real, quality stuff, you should be pissed off at the current industry. Which is filled with talentless hacks who create absolute slop, and put it in museums as "art". Those people are worthless to the industry. Meanwhile dome dude on youtube creates a stunning masterpiece with like chalk or something. That guy is irreplaceable.
As a fellow "artist" that see myself now fairly likely to lose my job in the future due to A.I., I gotta say that there's a lot of positive people who say "A.I. makes everyone an artist" but fail to realize that if the A.I. can generate imagery and sound better than humans, then it will be trivial to create better stories and ideas as well. The scariest scenario is that more and more people of the future will simply stop creating art, because the A.I. has far better ideas. Creativity itself... being given to the computer. A future of consuming unlimited soulless media while nobody is being creative themselves because it's so time consuming when the AI can do it better at a fraction of the time, is what we might see in our time. What kind of metaphor could I use? Like giving a child the option to eat unlimited candy, rather than real food. How it goes with the child's body, is my metaphor for how it goes with the minds of future generations that consume AI media around the clock.
@@Exsulator2 Those are good points and I can understand the frustration if working for a company or as a freelancer. Working for oneself with your own art creations/films is a different situation for me. There will also be those studios and companies who still prefer hiring a real person over having to learn and understand AI Software. Or just by preference for real people instead of investing in AI Robots. But yeah, I'm looking at some of the things merged together from the internet through AI art, and some of it looks visually good. Like how it can create multiple angles of a 2D drawing that would have taken an artist like me, a longer time unless using computer 3D animation. Even so, I rather create art myself from my mind, a pen/brush and hand. Old-fashioned computer art software as a tool as well. I've been able to create 9 feature length animated films as of late 2024 (since 2006) using my own original art, animation, creativity and music skills over the years. In the end, there are still a lot of unique artists creating original art/movies/shorts for their own ambitions, versus the cut/paste AI we're seeing at the moment. Yet the question may arise more often, "Is that real art or AI generated?" Remembering that there are many fans who still like the older cel animation (and anime) over computer CGI animation, and wish it didn't get replaced in movie theaters so much by CGI animated films.
I agree, I'm a software developer and I'm confident that my job will be handed over to AI by 2030. Same goes for any other profession, even science. A humanoid robot is in the pipeline, so there will be no manual labor left as well. There will be no work and there will be NO unconditional basic income. People will be completely useless and the few rich will not share their wealth. People tell me I'm a fatalist - I really wish I am :(
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth. If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult. You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
The “hollywood is so over” comment finds me quite skeptical and I’ll tell you why: if you knew how many times we have to tweak all the components that go into VFX shots, from modeling to layout, animation, shading, lighting and compositing, not just because they’re not ok, but because they have to match a director’s idea 100% (aka pixel-fuc*ing), you’d realize there is no way this stuff can replace us. There is no way a director, let alone a producer, will be able to make a movie on their own or even with a limited crew, just using AI. There will always be the need for people to enter prompts. So, if anything, this could become an extremely boring job, not nearly as exciting as making vfx shots. And eventually you know what? They’ll ask some compositor to fix the ai errors. And there you go again… making movies (especially blockbusters) is an extremely complicated and laborious art.
It's not too far away.. I assure you within the decade.. they'll have it nutted out. And you'll never hear about the movie studios firing 100s of employees because of "restructuring"..
@@laurking6577 no it won't. Most people are just not very creative, so it'll still come down to creatives to create. All AI will do is cut out alot of jobs by streamlining the filmmaking process, and possibly make films more samey, concentrating profits for shareholders. You can't make a whole film using AI, it'll always be kinda shit.
Hollywood isn't over because though the progress might seem fast, the progress in actually controlling generative AI, video in particular is very slow, nearly nonexistent.I think this might be because in a way, AI itself is only responsible for the speed of development of the video quality. People are responsible for its customizability. As far as visual fx technology, if it's not customizable, it doesn't really hold a candle to existing visual effects software. Right now generative video is helpful but it's basically loosely customizable stock footage.
That's the point nobody seems to get, none of the shit shown in the video is more than a stock generalistic video, you can generate stuff but with very limited control. I mean the lemonade spot can be replicated in 3 minutes if you can use any source without paying copyright shit like ai does
I'm glad you still can see what is AI in the details - for example the weirdly behaving back flowing water at the beach in 1:44 or the strange movement of the piano keys and the non existent but mirrored ring in 2:12. But of course it is going to be a hard time for stock footage makers because most clients are going to be completely ok with "almost real" ...
The first two were pretty easy to tell the sci-fi room was also easy to tell because AI typically likes to move the camera around like that. The girl in the fireplace was easy to tell because AI typically uses the same smile format when creating these kind of images, The concert was actually realistic until the last part were cloud made it look fake. The fakest one of them all was a sunflower girl and the old wrinkly lady. I caught the real ones because I feel like there was some reverse psychology going on and you pick something that would look easier for AI to generate
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth. If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult. You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
I play piano so I could tell as the keys weren’t in the right sequence of two black, three black between the white keys. There was two then two then four then they disappeared when pressed
@@mrchip13 you’d be surprised how many people will think it’s real, like those AI photos of open plan log retreats with a pool in the living room and stairs above the fireplace that finish at a dead end and people say “where is this? Looks amazing, I’d love to stay there”
Honestly, I guessed about 80% of the videos correctly. You can tell quite easily from the unnatural movement of organic things and small details, and how sometimes things that happen are disembodied and don't make sense upon close inspection. And If I saw a movie that used this quality of AI video, I would be appalled, because it would be too blatant. But in skilled hands, in combination with VFX, great potential! The main issue right now is how this stuff tricks plebs on the internet, especially in the third world. Right now, there are many people who believed that the US caused the earthquakes in Turkey via some underground technology. I spoke to such people. Never underestimate how stupid people can be.
Hollywood has been in decline for many years, and I think that this could mean it's final end. For far too long, Hollywood has dominated the viewpoints that are presented in society merely because it has access to the massive infrastructure that making films traditionally required. But now that films can be made by anybody with access to a computer, I think we're going to see a much wider variety of films made for many different viewpoints and tastes.
This technology is really impressive and I'm curious to learn more about how these models work, including how they were trained (we cannot forget about the actual artists whose work made these kinds of models possible in the first place!) However, I disagree about how this will change Hollywood and traditional filmmaking in general. What many fail to realize is that the process of making art is just as, if not more important than, the result. They want to go from A to C as fast as possible, that they forget about B. Traditional film-making is deeply rooted in artistic intention and vision. For instance, take music videos, which you pretty frequently in this video. The dance choreography is created by experts with actual intention in mind to match the song's rhythm, lyrics, and the artist's message. In narrative filmmaking, every single character expression, environment, piece of dialogue, keyframe, etc is made with purpose and direction. Directors and cinematographers carefully compose each shot, set designers build environments that help reflect the tone of the scene, and actors will refer to sensitive, personal experiences to better bring out dialogue. Even in animation, every keyframe is deliberately placed to convey even the most nuanced of emotions. Filmmakers and artists in general pour their personal experiences, emotions, and unique perspectives into every aspect of their work. You could argue that using detailed prompts to "direct" the AI is the same as directing a team of actual filmmakers. However, unlike humans, AI lacks personal experiences, emotional attachments, or genuine understanding of the world. It's literally a machine, incapable of drawing from lived experiences or emotional depth to inform its creations. When a director asks an actor to convey a complex emotion, the actor draws from their own life experiences. Generative AI, no matter how sophisticated the prompt, cannot replicate this level of depth of human experience and emotion. And I think portraying the need to hire actors, cinematographers, etc as a bad thing is pretty close-minded. We often forget how beneficial a collaborative environment can be. Working with people who all specialize in various fields allows everyone to pitch in their own ideas, their own experiences, and own spin to the film in a cohesive way. And if you just want to make a film all by yourself, you still can! You don't necessarily need to hire a whole team of people to make good films; there's numerous solo films on TH-cam that rival fully-fledged Hollywood blockbusters. It's more important about whether or not you're willing to learn and put in the work. If you don't want to put in any effort, don't expect a good result. I find the idea of relying entirely on a machine honestly quite sad, especially when you are more than fully capable of learning it yourself. With that being said, AI just seems like a mock-up tool at best. There can definitely be valid use-cases for AI as an ASSISTIVE tool, but outright replacing all artists is simply unrealistic. Even then, a great filmmaker may only need a rough, 15-second storyboard drawing to envision it on the big screen (such as Rian Johnson's infamous Knives Out storyboard drawing!). Also, the last thing I want is to have TH-cam be flooded with automated AI music videos or films made by people who just want to make a quick buck.
@@laurking6577 Yeah, tell AI to tell you about the intentions of artists who are no longer alive. And what was the vision Da Vinci? He first drew humans, then exhumed, and was also working on military machinery - along with flying machines. Clearly he wanted to turn humans into wooden boxes for war!!!!!! You are demented.
@@laurking6577 Can you explain how this would happen? Are you assuming that intention and vision are definable concepts? Is this a transhumanist religious assumption, that AI will fully replicate the human being?
This genuinely just feels like people that are completely isolated and lack real emotional connections celebrating their further isolation and lack of teamwork. Anyone who has worked with other people, made meaningful connections, felt the satisfaction that comes with seeing the result out of their hardwork along with other people, would not celebrate having that possibly being stripped away. Thos is just humans creating their own depression and unfullfillment but not realizing it.
2:10 it is very funny seeing the hand in the reflection stick out of the reflection trying to reach the keys 😂, although it is an impressive shot overall
2:10 As a pianist, I could easily tell this was AI generated (the keys would switch between black and white when they were pressed and they would morph in to each other) But I'm shocked at how clean the video looks overall, even displaying somewhat proper technique with the hands. And the others totally fooled me at times XD
Imagine, soon we will have people prompting advanced video generating AI to make something defected on purpose, like those old videos of will smith eating spaghetti, for a nostalgic effect, AI simulating AI simulating reality
Being amazed at first with all this AI video hype, now I am a bit more sceptical. Mostly because those are still single footages. Maybe it can work in some ads where you don't really need to follow any detailed script, just put some random shots in between the frames. And only when there are no people in the scenes, because they still look very "off". But in Holywood? C'mon, let's be real. Producing a movie, a music video, an animation - it is really much more than promting some random videos. You need to have so much more control over the footage. I animated couple of cartoons and can't really see ANY advanteges in using AI. It is really very detailed work, where you hove tons of layers stacked on each other, with many effects, masks, everything is heavily keyframed. So at the moment it is really nothing more than a extended version of stock videos market. Will see how it will develop in next years. For now - just a toy.
Yeah I think there's a lot of ignorance coming from people who have no idea about all the fine details that go into every department in making an actual film, tv series or commercial etc. This is just another example of a bubble that will burst because it doesn't seem remotely sustainable in the long run. Look at how people were using chatgpt a year ago because it was basically free only for them to flick a switch and limit the tools non paying users could use.
@@thehipsterhamster1929what rate? 2 years and still can't make hands or movements good as poorly animated ones, i mean you can't even properly obtain what you promted
I absolutely loved this video. Thank you so much for all of the information. Definitely liking and subscribing to your channel. I really appreciate you for doing this.
The problem people miss is that you’re always going to need great quality videos in your training data. And humans need to do that. And not any humans. It requires skill. Often years or decades of skill in cinematography
@@astralyd well, there is nothing good about lazy people driving, when they should have walked. Thats undeserved convenience they should not have, it makes them weaker... All this "instant gratification" talk reminds me of the manosphere nonsence floating around lately.
@@user-uf2df6zf5w You know i kinda feel bad for you and others. If you were an artist, you'd understand that what's great about art is the creative process. It's a joy that only making it yourself can bring. And it saddens me that some people have to claim a mixmash of other people's work as their own to feel anything. And yes, I feel a little better when I cycle to work because I've been exercising and not polluting. Well then just imagine that but 10x
@@user-uf2df6zf5w >Driving a car for 200 km is "instant" gratification >Using a computer to write a book is "instant" gratification Yep. Those are very sane samples of "instant gratification" from a very sane human. No doubt AI will benefit your complete sanity.
Thanks for the video. We will have Competitions for AI movies, sitcoms, etc. won by viewer numbers attributed to their creators. This is so awesome the power shift to any creative mind to show off talents without the huge budget constraints.
it's still not anywhere near that point. And to be honest, it never will. All this will do is create a tool that actual professionals can use to add to their process. Point being, random people with no experience in any given field of art where AI is "taking over" will not succeed. Even with AI, the only people that will succeed are the people that are passionate about those given art fields. Anybody who is actually passionate or interested in film for example wouldn't want to just use AI anyway, and anybody who isn't that kind of passionate to the point where they only use AI just won't be able to make a good movie, because obviously there is more to a film than just "producing a shot". Basically, maybe AI can become a tool that artists can use to integrate into their workflow, and those people might beat out other aritsts who refuse to use AI at all, but without any actual experience in whatever art the AI is apart of, without the hand of an actual artist, the know how and skill to properly integrate the AI into their process in a way that is a means to an end and not the end itself, AI will not effect anything, and will never replace anything either.
10/10 those uncanny frames can't fool anybody, I still don´t get why people is afraid of this technology, it got better yeah, but it still has a long way to look real.
Thinking of how thousands of porn videos, hardcore videos, extremely embarassing videos, crimes videos with everyone personal image could be made so easily with ai totally scares the hell out of me
I would love to see a full motion movie made in Runway, the atmospheres and lighting that is generated by Runway is incredible, just from seeing some of these clips, it completely revolutionizes how we can present realistic cinema in a previously unseen and unimaginable lighting effects and settings.
You know what is really frightening for the creative industry? We are only talking around 2 short years and look at the progress we have seen with A.I. If this pace continues or potentially speeds up as we find more useful use cases for this tech, you really have to wonder where A.I. will be in 10 years. The best thing that could have happened to A.I. is the hype train around it that brought it to mass market, that on its own is bringing in a lot of investment, ideas and pushing the tech far more than what we were seeing when it was just an experimental toy in some corporate lab, you have to imagine that as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, the ideas and investment could go through the roof. Honestly, I pity the fools that think A.I. is just a fad or a bubble ready to burst, and yes, the bubble might deflate somewhat as things calm down, but it's clear as day that A.I. is here to stay and only going to keep rapidly get better, and far more interest and money is going to be thrown at it as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, in other words, we are only just starting, and that is exciting and scary at the same time. What's really impressed me the most is how much better small open source locally run A.I. models have got, I remember just two years ago, the quality wasn't that great, and even thought there's still work to do, the quality on many of the A.I. models we can run locally on our computers are way better than just two years ago, and I really do wonder, how far can they push the quality for a given size model.
I agree with you that AI is here to stay and will grow fast, but it's not going to be what people expect. At first, people will attempt to replace VFX artists, actors, stock footage etc. which is the natural impulse in a new medium. Later, though, it will become it's own thing. When film was first tested, the first Silent Films were mostly imitating the art of Theatre. But they quickly parted ways in the next few decades with Charlie Chaplin, Griffith etc. It is crude at first and only a novelty, later becoming something else. The human perspective will still be a requirement, and making something in 5 minutes is not the same as spending 2 years on the same thing, the quality of thought is different.
I think I got about 60% right, a little over half. These are getting really good. The rock star one was a clear fake out. Some of the nature ones fooled me though, and they are the easiest to spot, but the drone over the cliff got me, as did the fireworks. The lady driving a car, I thought that was AI, but it was real.
Just like the early years of digital photography we can nitpick all we want. With more datasets for the ML and improved LLMs it’s only going to get more indistinguishable. Give it till the end of the decade and the industry is truly disrupted, leaving only the “enthusiasts” behind.
i was hoping to get a job in animation as ive always dreamt of doing it professionally since childhood, seems like im gonna need to settle for some office job 😔
@@a_alex_l2041 he's got a point this videos were horribly low resolution. regardless i was able to discern most of them. on the ones i missed however it would been nice if they weren't so low quality videos.
0:23 - Two guys on the beach merging into one person. A hand with a thumb where the pinky finger should be. "I don't know about you, but this looks pretty real to me"
You know it's especially fake when you have to question "why the hell would someone take the time to professionally film something like that?". There's no direction anywhere in the AI generations. No begginning Middle and end.
If you hadn’t kept asking if I thought this was real I would’ve thought all of them were real, except for the close-up of the old woman and the piano with two sets of hands.
16/17 no way i got the last one wrong :( When you know there is a possibility of an AI generated content its super easy to spot it, but if you just showed me those videos without context i would not be able to tell at all
@@Dennis-nc3vw There plenty of giveaways in the small details/backgrounds of AI generated videos. So it's not hard to pick out if you look for the subtle thing (and sometimes not so subtle things) outside of the main focus. Lets say you have a prompt "Man eating an apple on a beach while sitting in chair"......If you focus on the man eating an apple, it will probably look real as that is where AI is going to throw in the most accurate detailing. But if you look at the background, you may see some wonky looking chairs, non realistic waves, maybe a building floating on the water....That sort of thing. If you look closer at facial muscle movements and hair movements, you will probably see some giveaways as well. Point being, if you look at all the details in an AI video and not just at the main focus of the video, you will see stuff that doesn't make sense. Watch the video again with that in mind and you will see them as there are plenty of errors outside the main focus. AI is certainly getting more convincing, but if it isn't easy for you to spot things then that's simply because you aren't being observant enough.
😮😮😮...this is gonna get real crazy in a couple years for entertainment industry. No reason to deal with actors and musicians....and also content creators. The only thing that will be left is podcasts... Even journalism is becoming a generated product .😒
Thanks to our sponsor Video to Blog. Convert TH-cam videos into high-quality, SEO-optimized blog articles in seconds
www.videotoblog.ai/?via=ref
Number 2 is AI generated 0:28
did the company that's charging for commercial use train it's AI on copyrighted material?
Hollywood is over? Give me a break....
Make a movie like Hitchcocks "A lady vanishes" and make it wittier, more captivating, more suspenseful and more charming in a good old British way.
Have fun and come back to me when you're finished. As for Hitchcock original that was shot in six weeks and you have the same amount of time.
Got any other chinese friend bro 🥲
Can I use your Chinese friend question mark
It's so funny that we benchmark AI's improvement via prompting Will Smith eating spaghetti 😂
It should be will smith slapping spaghetti instead ;)
@@josephastrahan6403 or chris rock eating will smith, lol
it's the 'hello world' of programming but to test the AI videos hahaha
@@krisstopher8259 haha yes :P
Spaghetti eating Will Smith is for video generation what Lena was for image compression 🙂 (e.g. when JPEG algorithm was tested)
shows grandma with skin crawling around her face :is this real ?
LoOkS pReTTy ReAL tO mE
Yes it's real, grandma is very sick 😢
@@andregramazio3781early stage cancer sick
I just assumed all shots were fake lol
@@astralyd Nah the shot of woman driving the car looks way too stable to be AI, also AI vids are too smooth and have 0 camera noise which is a giveaway
Been in the CGI industry for over 20 years. Took many many years for CGI in movies to start looking really really good. Ai is doing it in an absolute fraction of the time. My industry has already been effected by it. Concept artists are one of the first to get hit. Employers will hire someone to do a few images then they will let that person go and run those images through Ai to get many more variations. I've worked at companies that specifically signed contracts saying they won't use Ai but they still did, mainly for internal concept art.
Thanks for sharing!
Same. Been using 3dsmax for over 22 years and to see this industry die off after all the 'millions' of hours of hard work I put in is depressing AF.
@@theAIsearch Impressive, even the channel owner is a bot.
💀
The good quality vfx and cgi is gonne be mortally wounded.
Anyone else notice how all the AI human movements look like they're animated? Especially head movements. Quick, sudden movements between static poses that they stay in for *just* too long.
Yes it's pretty much characteristic. Lots and lots of effort being put into anatomy that follows physics and natural movement.
It’s look reversed
Perhaps they animated a bunch of motions with cgi models and used that in the training data, or have them used to generate control nets when they're generating the video.
people are blind to it-captivated by the shiny, new toy. but what lasting value will this truly hold? when anyone can create a video with a few words, where’s the passion? the craftsmanship? without hard work behind it, it all becomes hollow, just mindless content polluting the internet. there will be nothing left to marvel at, no art from skill or effort, only empty spectacle. imagine a 5-year-old can whip up hollywood-level vfx in minutes-it's the death of creativity, a world where video content becomes as uninspired and disposable as cars rolling off an assembly line.
I wouldn't stress it too much. No matter what,.. it was all a matter of time 👌🏿.
It was inevitable.
But... The Human brain canvgenerate a trillion thoughts per second, and are prone to making mistakes at first, but then creating laws as we evolve.
👌🏿👌🏿👌🏿
AI cannot create a Stephen King book, or act like Denzel Washington.
It has no soul behind what it creates.
It's almost the equivalent as man trying to create something as beautiful as God's creations...Lol, it's just not going to happen 👌🏿
That's why I don't think we should concern about AI. It's a toy, it also can be a good tool to help to show the basic idea fast, but it won't change the main thing: people will always value the handcraft, the time and effort of a real human spend and put into his piece of art (or work). I even think that AI can increase the value of a real human work because it becomes something rarer and more valuable than ever.
@@music_weaving hard coping imo
And guess what? You'll still watch all of those "AI made films" if they are good.
So far only the privileged have access to learn how to make movies. It evens the playing field.
I have nearly 100% right. There are always small problems in the AI videos. For example does the hand in the mirror of the Piano sometimes reach out of the mirror. Faces often have glitches that don't feel right. Often reflections are to perfect, like in the spaceship. The only thing that really impressed me was the fireworks.
Thanks for sharing!
Just wait a year
@@DG123z Just wait a few months
@@Cznh Facts 💯 I was just trying to be conservative
The worst it's gonna be. Only getting better 🤯
This is what happens when you tease something like Sora and forget we're in the middle of an "AI arms race"
have to censor it so you cant have trump twerking!!
well said
Very true
I don't think they forgot, personally. I think they did it to see what the competition would do, and move forward accordingly.
I think it was too expensive to generate and it was costing OpenAI $100's a minute. So they would have gone broke if they publicly released it.
Things are going so crazy... In the near future, most people will believe that nothing is real.
early AI: no one thinks it's real. mid AI: most people think it's all real. late AI: no one thinks anything is real because AI is everywhere
😅xd, la gente aún sigue creyendo que Josh peck, murió y fue remplazado por un doble
What a great prospect, so you're all excited about it? what's wrong with people? sigh
Looking forward to using AI, so it can tell you what is real?
That is the whole point...
The funny thing is AI always portray something too nice and too clean like it's staged. It's like they can't even program it to understand how messy and dirty real world should be.
this
Let's see what happens in 10 years.
@@jimf.1318 or a few months
@@wdp183 Nah, this is just the infancy, it'll take some time before AI could definitely replicate reality without having to rely on already existing material.
As someone who studied AI for a long time, this quiz was too easy
Don't look for what's real, look for what's fake
Here's the basics of what was wrong with every AI video:
1 - Hair is too stiff, flow is unnatural
2 - People in the water merges then disappears
4 - Buildings floating in water
5 - See the "remains" of an explosion, except that explosion never happened
6 - Her left eye becomes almost entirely black
8 - The holes in the panel hanging on the left side completely disappear
11 - The phone screen doesn't entirely match what's happening
12 - She has a necklace but no chain around her neck
13 - The wave on the right dies out but then comes but twice the length
14 - Her face is generating as it zooms out
16 - Reflection of hand is emerging from the back panel, black keys disappear for no reason
17 - People sitting right behind other people on the right side, way too close
Oh and also every AI video is around 240p for some reason
As someone who never studied AI, I've got almost everything right.
Interestingly, the woman in the field of sunflowers looked real to me, but I realised that these are SUN flowers not "looking" towards the sun
Bro give me your linkedin i need some guidance related ai/ml
Give it a few more months. Resistance is futile.
Even ai Will improve more and that will be any inconsistencies
@@klausr3581 Nah, cope harder
Most of the AI video generators are slow-mo, so the 2 minutes in reality is 1 minute if you speed it up to normal speed
I think thats because their basis footage is stock footage which is normally slowed down
these AI still need training data and those data comes from humans. once the internet starts to be flooded by ai videos, they will essentially be feeding in their own data and scenes get stagnant pretty quickly
I don't think it will be 100% but most of it for sure
If there was no noise then yeah, it would get stale very quick. But there is noise and weight decay, meaning things can always change. This gives some robustness to the model. In due time I'm certain that TH-cam or a similar video platform will start experimenting with AI models generating videos that are trained off of views, likes, and comments, aka others' attention. Training data will still very much be abundant even if the data is predominantly generated by AI.
Ml can use synthetic data
I think they will have AI detect software to avoid using those videos
@@yerpderp6800
"Just add noise"
-the lukewarm IQ
I think you don't understand what OP said there. AI feeds off videos to learn from. If you don't have any videos, and it's all AI generated, and those AI generated images are set to a learnt thing, they will produce the same result over and over. Nothing will change or improve, because AI doesn't have imagination or the ability to "walk around and film a scene".
15:17 military boy throwing up his middle finger 😂
"serious look ✌ to a happy look 🖕"
It’s garbage idk why the hype
🤪
@@mercedesf1fan176 hype is because it went from the first thing to this in what, a year? how's it gonna look like in 5 years??? the progression curve is crazy
I think ai is tryna send a message
'You don't need to hire actors, build sets, visual effects specialists. You don't need to hire musicians to write songs.' This is taking the humanity out of creative expression.
if the humanity was all that it's cracked up to be the AI wouldn't be eating our lunch.
Disagree. Only if the given tech restricted the artist from expression would this be true. But as long as the artist can say no to his work and change it as said artist pleases than no humanity is taken. On the contrary, now even a low income person should be able to create block buster films or whatever form of high quality art media they please.
I used to fear that but now I think AI will be integrated into existing processes/workflows and popular demand will prefer the human touch (e.g. a real human singing) but also the vastly new sounds that AI could offer. I now think when it comes to this type of AI, things won't be as bad as people think. As for artificial general intelligence, though, that does concern me as making AI conscious is scary.
It makes me wanna cry
@@pizzahot133Exactly, AI is still in its infancy, I can see in a decade AI having the ability to follow an Artist's vision precisely, we just aren't there yet.
Damn, AI is almost as soulless as the humans that like it. Really impressive.
Thank you for commenting this I was so upset to see literally nobody else upset with the way he's bashing all the people whose jobs it is to create the things he's making with ai 😭😭 like have fun with it yourself man but it seems like you're actively trying to get these people fired
ai going to change the world, its great
this is such a boomer comment
@@Erazoth help me you're so right 💀 still agree with it tho
kinda rude ngl but in my opinion ai is just gonna be a great tool for humanity
I remember when the Will Smith spaghetti video had people speechless
The generational leaps have been wild
Makes you wonder what they aren't showing us.
I hear ya re the if this is what’s public concern … I watched a modded flipper unlock 20 cars , change the wifi ssid , change tv channel, unlock hotel doors, clone a bank card with pin. In the hands of my 17 yr old nephew. What do “they” have .. if this is on Amazon.
who are "they"
@@eliadmusicthe elites, basically people with billions of dollars mostly from generational wealth that i wouldn't say "control the world" but are on par with the government because they give the funding.
tf you mean "they" are you some kind of concspiracy theorist?
@@djslip_irieimpossible 😳
i don't think hollywood is over; hollywood as we know is over
Hollywood is rapidly changing, or at least certain parts of it are rapidly changing. Video creation apps will be a major help to film makers, especially the ones who cannot afford to pay millions for special FX.
It will give power in the hands of indie producers.
Just imagine what kind of memes awaits for us!
We are not quite at that stage yet, but I can see over the next decade that many will be wondering, why watch Hollywood movies or tv shows when I or anyone else can create their own for free.
Better yet, using an existing show like Star Trek TNG and having A.I. create new episodes by it's going through all the episodes and understanding the arc of the actors, story and theme of the show and then creates new episodes with new stories that fit the narrative of the show, the possibilities are endless.
I know some will say, never going to happen, but if you looked at how much A.I. has developed in just 2 years, you can only imagine what it will be like over the next decade or few decades from now, and this could be very destructive to the creative industry, especially the ones that are not listening to fans as we see with Star Trek and how many are not happy with the current state of Star Trek, basically, we could get far more fan made shows on basically everything, that is a clear threat to the creative industry because of having so much cheap contents for viewers to use, it reduces the value of human made content a lot.
With all this said, for much of what I said above to happen, it will have to be a locally run A.I. model as online models will be too restrictive in what you can and can't do, and what I said above with the Star Trek thing, it's highly unlikely that any online model will allow that, but locally run A.I. well the sky is the limit.
@@paul1979uk2000 lol "decade", more like 1 year to 2 before the end of all creative fields, as viable businesses anyway. The money will be in cloud, how much compute power you have and how much you can sell it for. I agree cloud services will be more restrictive, but the majority will go to the cloud, and i think because of that there will definitely be a competition for what company has the least restrictions.
Tv drama and cinema has about 2 years left. We are probably within 5 years of being able to say to our ai phone, "Make me an 87 minute long film about a group of cowboys stepping through a time portal into prehistoric times.
Make it about their struggle to re-find the portal and survive the dinosaurs etc.
Create it in realistic cinema quality with the dialogue in American English.
Genre is action adventure."
Instantly, you have a Hollywood quality film that only you will ever see.
Ai has long promised a joblessness tsunami... who'd have thought it would start with Hollywood?
Drivers next.
OpenAI all thought sora would never release because of how good it is but all they did was get their competition to start working on ai videos, they are gonna release it with no limitations at this point because everyone else already has
Did they say this or is it just speculation? i don't get why they would assume that , I think they just thought they were ahead , not that no one would ever do it...
We don´t know how many times they tried until they made those beautiful perfect videos. Anyway, Sora is a bit better than all the products now.
@@AfifFarhatithey basically said this but op is exaggerating a bit, they were worried about its release for a lot of reasons and legal reasons I don’t really want to all name. and they even delayed it so they can add safety measures, but once they released it you know what happens from there lol
the telltale sign of ai in people is the skin on their face. No normal person has close to perfect skin ever, like the two clips of the real women had imperfections like pores and moles but the ai generated guy and girls all had glowing skin.
AI will never capture the same feel as a movie made by people with a passion for film making.
Not the same. Much better.
it's impressive to see ai generate things but it's not nice if it's replacing what we have
Consummers dont car about this. Mainly because it's been years since movies were made with passion, like tell me, are the new star wars, marvel, avatar, disney movies really made with passion ?
@gorfousenpai4860 They're at the very least made by artists, they have something behind them, AI doesn't, it is antithesis of art, and the death of it.
pfft right. youll cringe at this in 20 years when ai makes everything better.
I'm an electronic music producer and we spectated the same situation in 2000s when $1 billion cost mixing consoles in a special buildings were replaced by $200 cost software at your bedrooms.
In a 2010 you had complete symphonic orchestra under your fingertips.
And now you have even singing software which sounds extremely natural for just $150 and free LLM which can generate unlimited lyrics in seconds.
Yes, lots of jobs will disappear.
Some people (who explore new technologies and opportunities) will become very famous which wouldn't be possible for them without these technologies.
It's just how nature and the evolution works: people invent new tools and competition becomes more hard.
The difference is just in a speed of changes. It took a centuries at the ancient times, but it takes just a year at present.
It's just a life ...
indeed , people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt , i know it's not simple but we don't have a choice really....
I'm here for augmentations and robo-prosthetics, the rest will fade just as quick as it appeared. The era of media consumption is going down faaaast.
@@AfifFarhati ►people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt◄
Unfortunately, that's not the case.
We have a huge limitation on learning and the evolution of AI is so fasta we have no chance "adapting" and "learning new stuff" as any new thing you might learn AI can do better, faster and cheaper.
I agree with ya
There's so much junk produced now that no one even needs to learn to play a keyboard.
How cute that people a few years ago were saying actors will soon be obsolete. We're talking about the entire industry being obsolete soon. It just hit me that this may create even more of an echo-chamber effect with ideas and communication. We thought social media was bad. Wait until everyone will be able to create their own Hollywood movie based on their own personalized sense of values, ideals and ethics. I fear nobody is going to adapt and change with the times. Why would you when everyone can create their own reality? Scary scary thought! This is going to fuel isolationalism that probably may lead to even more conflict amongst those that have learned to be uncompromising through this technology.
Yup
Actors are real individuals and will always be more interesting. Leave your echo chamber
@@astralyd So are family doctors. But they will also be replaced .
You are right in one point: It will get stale.
When everything is AI generated, and AI learns from what we feed it, then it will generate the same things over and over - with only mild differences.
If you think this will take out an entire industry you are sorely mistaken. The advent of CG art didn't take out actors, but what it did for sure was take out any sort of real movie - where people act around props, rather than an empty blue room later filled in with CG.
What you can always hope for is more slop to consume. AI does a great job with this, or rather: The prompters are doing a good job fulfilling their own empty desires.
BEST take on this so far💯. Humanity wasnt ready gor social media and look at what that did...we're finallly experiencing the fallout. Now 10 years later they're making AI
Am I the only one who is not interested in closed source AI tools?
Kinda tired of paying to create legal training data for such companies. Especially when they do not share research papers.
And I must add that to create something actually usable with AI - you need to have actual skills and experience in that field.
Good for exploring concepts - bad as final output, and terrible if you need to change even a small detail.
Eh, the last statement depends on the progress of other tools. You can make some decent effects with reference pictures and ai video now, maybe not something that is 100% accurate to the source, but for certain work (like effects) it doesn't need to be. Same goes for models if we are talking about 3d mesh generation through 2d images or 3d video.
Eventually, you obviously still need expertise in the given field. But it being bad for final output and terrible for transformation is not necessarily a rule.
I’ve worked in the Georgia film industry for the past 8 years. It became apparent during last year’s strikes that the major studios were holding onto the freedom to use AI with a death grip. It makes sense when you think of the costs they can eliminate just by generating what they need rather than hiring and logistically supporting a much larger crew to do it for much higher costs and in a much longer timeframe.
In just a short span, I’ve also noticed this incredible leap in AI technology and realism.
You can’t tell me those entertainment juggernauts and their shareholders aren’t absolutely pouring money into this tech’s development.
I love what I do, but I see this train barreling down the tracks towards us.
I’m currently changing careers to a trade that will still need humans for a good while longer.
You sir are smart
4:35 "It's so hard to tell what's AI and what's real anymore" as he shows a video with the crowd melting into each other
"Unrealistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a fork. ✅
"Realistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a spoon. ❌
Edit: thanks for 100 likes
It's because of country of origin. They just didn't teach it really to make forks
🤭🤣🤣🤣
I don't believe it will replace traditional film making. These tools will complement existing methods. But they will vanish many jobs in the field of advertising.
Give it 5 -10 years, entire movies from single prompts.
Ad agencies are done. All marketing and visuals are already starting to be done internally.
THAT'S THE POINT!!!!!!
@@richardsrandomadventures If you want mediocre slop then sure. The whole idea of a film being made from a single prompt is incredibly ignorant of how great films are made.
@@TheCreativeNickwith the right tools and prompt, your words will mean nothing soon. Always remember that this is as bad as AI is ever going to be
based-on this; when Morpheus ask Neo
"what is real?" has aged flawlessly, and is up
Googleplex‼️🥶
The tower of Babel aged like fine wine too.
@@revisit8480 #peace I mean...; what we do know now is that "all exist" at the same time #specialrelativity101
In 2024, many AI generated trailers look like they're all in slow motion and morphing, so that is a major hurdle to overcome. But if it won't take long to improve, then AI Filmmaking is just another form of competition with varying results. Creating art the traditional way with learned art skills will not go obsolete, speaking as an artist.
Precisely. And people who make traditional art shouldn't be afraid.
If you make real, quality stuff, you should be pissed off at the current industry. Which is filled with talentless hacks who create absolute slop, and put it in museums as "art". Those people are worthless to the industry.
Meanwhile dome dude on youtube creates a stunning masterpiece with like chalk or something. That guy is irreplaceable.
As a fellow "artist" that see myself now fairly likely to lose my job in the future due to A.I., I gotta say that there's a lot of positive people who say "A.I. makes everyone an artist" but fail to realize that if the A.I. can generate imagery and sound better than humans, then it will be trivial to create better stories and ideas as well. The scariest scenario is that more and more people of the future will simply stop creating art, because the A.I. has far better ideas. Creativity itself... being given to the computer. A future of consuming unlimited soulless media while nobody is being creative themselves because it's so time consuming when the AI can do it better at a fraction of the time, is what we might see in our time. What kind of metaphor could I use? Like giving a child the option to eat unlimited candy, rather than real food. How it goes with the child's body, is my metaphor for how it goes with the minds of future generations that consume AI media around the clock.
@@Exsulator2 Those are good points and I can understand the frustration if working for a company or as a freelancer. Working for oneself with your own art creations/films is a different situation for me.
There will also be those studios and companies who still prefer hiring a real person over having to learn and understand AI Software. Or just by preference for real people instead of investing in AI Robots.
But yeah, I'm looking at some of the things merged together from the internet through AI art, and some of it looks visually good.
Like how it can create multiple angles of a 2D drawing that would have taken an artist like me, a longer time unless using computer 3D animation.
Even so, I rather create art myself from my mind, a pen/brush and hand. Old-fashioned computer art software as a tool as well. I've been able to create 9 feature length animated films as of late 2024 (since 2006) using my own original art, animation, creativity and music skills over the years.
In the end, there are still a lot of unique artists creating original art/movies/shorts for their own ambitions, versus the cut/paste AI we're seeing at the moment. Yet the question may arise more often, "Is that real art or AI generated?"
Remembering that there are many fans who still like the older cel animation (and anime) over computer CGI animation, and wish it didn't get replaced in movie theaters so much by CGI animated films.
AI is not only going to ruin the entertainment industry, it's going to end humanity.
I agree, I'm a software developer and I'm confident that my job will be handed over to AI by 2030. Same goes for any other profession, even science. A humanoid robot is in the pipeline, so there will be no manual labor left as well. There will be no work and there will be NO unconditional basic income. People will be completely useless and the few rich will not share their wealth. People tell me I'm a fatalist - I really wish I am :(
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
I haven't seen the full video yet, but the pianist doesn't wear a ring on his/her left hand while the mirroring image of the hand does.
good catch!
And the reflections of his hand occasionally move trough the wood onto the real keynotes.
The way the keys are pressed down tend to merge together, like the keys on top look pressed, but the ends of them look like one solid piece.
Also, fingers literally coming out of Mirror and pushes the keys
That was how I noticed that one. Plus, most of these type of AI videos are soft and not very detailed - like a PS3 game or something...lol
The “hollywood is so over” comment finds me quite skeptical and I’ll tell you why: if you knew how many times we have to tweak all the components that go into VFX shots, from modeling to layout, animation, shading, lighting and compositing, not just because they’re not ok, but because they have to match a director’s idea 100% (aka pixel-fuc*ing), you’d realize there is no way this stuff can replace us. There is no way a director, let alone a producer, will be able to make a movie on their own or even with a limited crew, just using AI.
There will always be the need for people to enter prompts. So, if anything, this could become an extremely boring job, not nearly as exciting as making vfx shots. And eventually you know what? They’ll ask some compositor to fix the ai errors.
And there you go again… making movies (especially blockbusters) is an extremely complicated and laborious art.
Yes it will just you wait
It's not too far away.. I assure you within the decade.. they'll have it nutted out. And you'll never hear about the movie studios firing 100s of employees because of "restructuring"..
@@laurking6577 no it won't. Most people are just not very creative, so it'll still come down to creatives to create. All AI will do is cut out alot of jobs by streamlining the filmmaking process, and possibly make films more samey, concentrating profits for shareholders. You can't make a whole film using AI, it'll always be kinda shit.
i won't watch some generated garbage what's the point, I want to see something that took some effort
@@astralyd yes but very soon you wont be able to guess whats real and whats not
15:18 I love how Ai has got the grasp of middle finger,But not really
As my Gen X eyes age, I have a harder and harder time distinguishing reality.
15:17 lmao this caught me off gaurd
My goodness! This is going break so many industries if this keeps up.
legal firms likely won't let that happen
It's inevitable.
it will only impact production studios that aren't making good stuff anyway.
Eventually money will go away, and humanity will have to move away from currency and economies.
It's F/x that's going to get the axe first. 1-2 minutes is all you need for an explosion, car chase, closeup of an alien, etc. CGI is dead.
Hollywood isn't over because though the progress might seem fast, the progress in actually controlling generative AI, video in particular is very slow, nearly nonexistent.I think this might be because in a way, AI itself is only responsible for the speed of development of the video quality. People are responsible for its customizability.
As far as visual fx technology, if it's not customizable, it doesn't really hold a candle to existing visual effects software. Right now generative video is helpful but it's basically loosely customizable stock footage.
That's the point nobody seems to get, none of the shit shown in the video is more than a stock generalistic video, you can generate stuff but with very limited control.
I mean the lemonade spot can be replicated in 3 minutes if you can use any source without paying copyright shit like ai does
I'm glad you still can see what is AI in the details - for example the weirdly behaving back flowing water at the beach in 1:44 or the strange movement of the piano keys and the non existent but mirrored ring in 2:12. But of course it is going to be a hard time for stock footage makers because most clients are going to be completely ok with "almost real" ...
The first two were pretty easy to tell the sci-fi room was also easy to tell because AI typically likes to move the camera around like that. The girl in the fireplace was easy to tell because AI typically uses the same smile format when creating these kind of images, The concert was actually realistic until the last part were cloud made it look fake. The fakest one of them all was a sunflower girl and the old wrinkly lady. I caught the real ones because I feel like there was some reverse psychology going on and you pick something that would look easier for AI to generate
thx for sharing!
2025 is about to be wild
indeed
Rest of humanities future after the singularity. A new era.
Somebody gotta work hard to make 2025 wild
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
And the future of our society will be so fckin stupid💀
I play piano so I could tell as the keys weren’t in the right sequence of two black, three black between the white keys.
There was two then two then four then they disappeared when pressed
@@mrchip13 you’d be surprised how many people will think it’s real, like those AI photos of open plan log retreats with a pool in the living room and stairs above the fireplace that finish at a dead end and people say “where is this? Looks amazing, I’d love to stay there”
The key was gone when it is pressed✌️
@@TayWoode And for exactly those people is this channel, telling them how incredible this shit looks. 1 brain cell zombies. Humanity is devolving.
The fingers also pop out of the reflective varnish like some kind of reality bending marvel character.
Also the reflected hand had a ring on it's finger.
the fast blowing smoke on #11 gave it away. that's AI
Honestly, I guessed about 80% of the videos correctly. You can tell quite easily from the unnatural movement of organic things and small details, and how sometimes things that happen are disembodied and don't make sense upon close inspection. And If I saw a movie that used this quality of AI video, I would be appalled, because it would be too blatant. But in skilled hands, in combination with VFX, great potential! The main issue right now is how this stuff tricks plebs on the internet, especially in the third world. Right now, there are many people who believed that the US caused the earthquakes in Turkey via some underground technology. I spoke to such people. Never underestimate how stupid people can be.
My main fear is how this will be used as a tool to control
I knew it was real because of the mole on her chin driving
yes! AI characters won't have these flaws
The mole on her chin was driving?
@@UlyssesDrax She was driving with her chin, dummy.
Eye movements were my clue
@@UlyssesDrax if you feed it enough, yes
i have yet to see ai do much beyond stock footage. When you can prompt human interaction at an emotional level things will become interesting.
Oh, so in a few months then?.
You already can
Don't know why people want to replace themselves with technology.
Book script to movie?
@@krunkle5136 its the next step in evolution! you see, humans are just too fragile and stupid and temporary to keep going
Hollywood doesn't need AI to be over. They doing just fine on they/their own.
15:16 From peace to war 😂😂😂
a good way to tell is to focus on a tiny detail, then look back in a few seconds
Hollywood has been in decline for many years, and I think that this could mean it's final end. For far too long, Hollywood has dominated the viewpoints that are presented in society merely because it has access to the massive infrastructure that making films traditionally required. But now that films can be made by anybody with access to a computer, I think we're going to see a much wider variety of films made for many different viewpoints and tastes.
good to get rid of woke hollywood
RIP Wokewood
This technology is really impressive and I'm curious to learn more about how these models work, including how they were trained (we cannot forget about the actual artists whose work made these kinds of models possible in the first place!)
However, I disagree about how this will change Hollywood and traditional filmmaking in general. What many fail to realize is that the process of making art is just as, if not more important than, the result. They want to go from A to C as fast as possible, that they forget about B.
Traditional film-making is deeply rooted in artistic intention and vision. For instance, take music videos, which you pretty frequently in this video. The dance choreography is created by experts with actual intention in mind to match the song's rhythm, lyrics, and the artist's message. In narrative filmmaking, every single character expression, environment, piece of dialogue, keyframe, etc is made with purpose and direction. Directors and cinematographers carefully compose each shot, set designers build environments that help reflect the tone of the scene, and actors will refer to sensitive, personal experiences to better bring out dialogue. Even in animation, every keyframe is deliberately placed to convey even the most nuanced of emotions. Filmmakers and artists in general pour their personal experiences, emotions, and unique perspectives into every aspect of their work.
You could argue that using detailed prompts to "direct" the AI is the same as directing a team of actual filmmakers. However, unlike humans, AI lacks personal experiences, emotional attachments, or genuine understanding of the world. It's literally a machine, incapable of drawing from lived experiences or emotional depth to inform its creations. When a director asks an actor to convey a complex emotion, the actor draws from their own life experiences. Generative AI, no matter how sophisticated the prompt, cannot replicate this level of depth of human experience and emotion.
And I think portraying the need to hire actors, cinematographers, etc as a bad thing is pretty close-minded. We often forget how beneficial a collaborative environment can be. Working with people who all specialize in various fields allows everyone to pitch in their own ideas, their own experiences, and own spin to the film in a cohesive way. And if you just want to make a film all by yourself, you still can! You don't necessarily need to hire a whole team of people to make good films; there's numerous solo films on TH-cam that rival fully-fledged Hollywood blockbusters. It's more important about whether or not you're willing to learn and put in the work. If you don't want to put in any effort, don't expect a good result. I find the idea of relying entirely on a machine honestly quite sad, especially when you are more than fully capable of learning it yourself.
With that being said, AI just seems like a mock-up tool at best. There can definitely be valid use-cases for AI as an ASSISTIVE tool, but outright replacing all artists is simply unrealistic. Even then, a great filmmaker may only need a rough, 15-second storyboard drawing to envision it on the big screen (such as Rian Johnson's infamous Knives Out storyboard drawing!).
Also, the last thing I want is to have TH-cam be flooded with automated AI music videos or films made by people who just want to make a quick buck.
We all know it but it will get to a point when it can replicate artistic intention and vision
@@laurking6577
Yeah, tell AI to tell you about the intentions of artists who are no longer alive.
And what was the vision Da Vinci? He first drew humans, then exhumed, and was also working on military machinery - along with flying machines. Clearly he wanted to turn humans into wooden boxes for war!!!!!!
You are demented.
@@laurking6577 Can you explain how this would happen? Are you assuming that intention and vision are definable concepts? Is this a transhumanist religious assumption, that AI will fully replicate the human being?
This genuinely just feels like people that are completely isolated and lack real emotional connections celebrating their further isolation and lack of teamwork. Anyone who has worked with other people, made meaningful connections, felt the satisfaction that comes with seeing the result out of their hardwork along with other people, would not celebrate having that possibly being stripped away. Thos is just humans creating their own depression and unfullfillment but not realizing it.
2:10 it is very funny seeing the hand in the reflection stick out of the reflection trying to reach the keys 😂, although it is an impressive shot overall
2:10 As a pianist, I could easily tell this was AI generated (the keys would switch between black and white when they were pressed and they would morph in to each other)
But I'm shocked at how clean the video looks overall, even displaying somewhat proper technique with the hands. And the others totally fooled me at times XD
and goofy shadows. the shadow was reaching in to play a note
Plus the reflection had a ring on the finger when the hand didn’t have one
Imagine, soon we will have people prompting advanced video generating AI to make something defected on purpose, like those old videos of will smith eating spaghetti, for a nostalgic effect, AI simulating AI simulating reality
Being amazed at first with all this AI video hype, now I am a bit more sceptical. Mostly because those are still single footages. Maybe it can work in some ads where you don't really need to follow any detailed script, just put some random shots in between the frames. And only when there are no people in the scenes, because they still look very "off". But in Holywood? C'mon, let's be real. Producing a movie, a music video, an animation - it is really much more than promting some random videos. You need to have so much more control over the footage. I animated couple of cartoons and can't really see ANY advanteges in using AI. It is really very detailed work, where you hove tons of layers stacked on each other, with many effects, masks, everything is heavily keyframed. So at the moment it is really nothing more than a extended version of stock videos market. Will see how it will develop in next years. For now - just a toy.
I thought it was horrible and distopic and now I think it's still horrible and distopic.
Bro it's about the rate of improvement of the AI
Yeah I think there's a lot of ignorance coming from people who have no idea about all the fine details that go into every department in making an actual film, tv series or commercial etc. This is just another example of a bubble that will burst because it doesn't seem remotely sustainable in the long run. Look at how people were using chatgpt a year ago because it was basically free only for them to flick a switch and limit the tools non paying users could use.
@@thehipsterhamster1929what rate? 2 years and still can't make hands or movements good as poorly animated ones, i mean you can't even properly obtain what you promted
@@SoulyG yes, however the rate of schizo image transitions, to actual smooth video production is undeniable. it's night and day
They all look like AI other than some landscapes.
Gymnastics when you fly on your job application
The piano playing was pretty easy when the mirrors hands were coming through the reflection of the piano
I absolutely loved this video. Thank you so much for all of the information. Definitely liking and subscribing to your channel. I really appreciate you for doing this.
Hollywood will only be over when faces and people are consistent and can be directed. Otherwise this is and immensely powerful tool.
The speed with which advances are happening, I'm guessing it could literally be a few months when this is solved.
@@abdulhai4977delusional 😂
@@abdulhai4977 It's been a few months already and this issue is far from solved.
The problem people miss is that you’re always going to need great quality videos in your training data. And humans need to do that. And not any humans. It requires skill. Often years or decades of skill in cinematography
Everything about this is evil. There is nothing good about lazy unskilled people gaining instant gratification from generated movies.
Okay, dont use a car then... Actually dont even use an computer... What you said is so stupid it's actually insane.
@@aclutchboy5389 he's right, your comparaison make no sense
@@astralyd well, there is nothing good about lazy people driving, when they should have walked. Thats undeserved convenience they should not have, it makes them weaker...
All this "instant gratification" talk reminds me of the manosphere nonsence floating around lately.
@@user-uf2df6zf5w You know i kinda feel bad for you and others. If you were an artist, you'd understand that what's great about art is the creative process. It's a joy that only making it yourself can bring. And it saddens me that some people have to claim a mixmash of other people's work as their own to feel anything. And yes, I feel a little better when I cycle to work because I've been exercising and not polluting. Well then just imagine that but 10x
@@user-uf2df6zf5w
>Driving a car for 200 km is "instant" gratification
>Using a computer to write a book is "instant" gratification
Yep. Those are very sane samples of "instant gratification" from a very sane human. No doubt AI will benefit your complete sanity.
Thanks for the video. We will have Competitions for AI movies, sitcoms, etc. won by viewer numbers attributed to their creators. This is so awesome the power shift to any creative mind to show off talents without the huge budget constraints.
0:23, that girl in the back got destroyed by that wave
Melted
Gymnasts are the new Will Smith
Love how only a few months ago people are saying "ain't no way ai this bad stealing my job" and now here we are....
where?
it's still not anywhere near that point. And to be honest, it never will. All this will do is create a tool that actual professionals can use to add to their process.
Point being, random people with no experience in any given field of art where AI is "taking over" will not succeed. Even with AI, the only people that will succeed are the people that are passionate about those given art fields. Anybody who is actually passionate or interested in film for example wouldn't want to just use AI anyway, and anybody who isn't that kind of passionate to the point where they only use AI just won't be able to make a good movie, because obviously there is more to a film than just "producing a shot".
Basically, maybe AI can become a tool that artists can use to integrate into their workflow, and those people might beat out other aritsts who refuse to use AI at all, but without any actual experience in whatever art the AI is apart of, without the hand of an actual artist, the know how and skill to properly integrate the AI into their process in a way that is a means to an end and not the end itself, AI will not effect anything, and will never replace anything either.
@@HewLibTaco
Cope
@@HewLibTaco While you certainly have a point, it has an effect & is replacing certain jobs & crafts as we speak.
It's still pretty bad
The fashionshow was easy to spot as AI because almost no one was looking at the model
This is quite honestly horrifying
Hollywood is over? You mean goodbye special effects staff, visual designers, propsmen and location organizers.
10/10 those uncanny frames can't fool anybody, I still don´t get why people is afraid of this technology, it got better yeah, but it still has a long way to look real.
For a second there I thought you were identifying every black man eating spaghetti as Will Smith. 😄
These AI generators often have policies to not generate real people, so people are generating the closest thing to Will Smith eating spaghetti.
0:40 No, that's not Real de Janeiro, it's Fake de Janeiro
lol
Thinking of how thousands of porn videos, hardcore videos, extremely embarassing videos, crimes videos with everyone personal image could be made so easily with ai totally scares the hell out of me
I would love to see a full motion movie made in Runway, the atmospheres and lighting that is generated by Runway is incredible, just from seeing some of these clips, it completely revolutionizes how we can present realistic cinema in a previously unseen and unimaginable lighting effects and settings.
So you are telling me that now we can have a better version of "The Rock eating rocks" or "Vin Dysel drinking dysel"?!?
*I see why you have so many subs, you came in with the sauce. You mentioned all of the websites and how to use em, very detailed for novices. Thanks*
You know what is really frightening for the creative industry? We are only talking around 2 short years and look at the progress we have seen with A.I.
If this pace continues or potentially speeds up as we find more useful use cases for this tech, you really have to wonder where A.I. will be in 10 years.
The best thing that could have happened to A.I. is the hype train around it that brought it to mass market, that on its own is bringing in a lot of investment, ideas and pushing the tech far more than what we were seeing when it was just an experimental toy in some corporate lab, you have to imagine that as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, the ideas and investment could go through the roof.
Honestly, I pity the fools that think A.I. is just a fad or a bubble ready to burst, and yes, the bubble might deflate somewhat as things calm down, but it's clear as day that A.I. is here to stay and only going to keep rapidly get better, and far more interest and money is going to be thrown at it as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, in other words, we are only just starting, and that is exciting and scary at the same time.
What's really impressed me the most is how much better small open source locally run A.I. models have got, I remember just two years ago, the quality wasn't that great, and even thought there's still work to do, the quality on many of the A.I. models we can run locally on our computers are way better than just two years ago, and I really do wonder, how far can they push the quality for a given size model.
I agree with you that AI is here to stay and will grow fast, but it's not going to be what people expect. At first, people will attempt to replace VFX artists, actors, stock footage etc. which is the natural impulse in a new medium. Later, though, it will become it's own thing. When film was first tested, the first Silent Films were mostly imitating the art of Theatre. But they quickly parted ways in the next few decades with Charlie Chaplin, Griffith etc. It is crude at first and only a novelty, later becoming something else.
The human perspective will still be a requirement, and making something in 5 minutes is not the same as spending 2 years on the same thing, the quality of thought is different.
I think I got about 60% right, a little over half. These are getting really good. The rock star one was a clear fake out. Some of the nature ones fooled me though, and they are the easiest to spot, but the drone over the cliff got me, as did the fireworks. The lady driving a car, I thought that was AI, but it was real.
Just like the early years of digital photography we can nitpick all we want. With more datasets for the ML and improved LLMs it’s only going to get more indistinguishable. Give it till the end of the decade and the industry is truly disrupted, leaving only the “enthusiasts” behind.
also, the copyright issues with AI will be a Massacre!
as an artist, ai scares me, and It seems that actors are soon to experience my fear
i was hoping to get a job in animation as ive always dreamt of doing it professionally since childhood, seems like im gonna need to settle for some office job 😔
shows videos in 240p resolution: is this real?
Man the fact that you already struggle when it is so young and so bad and so low quality tells us everything.
@@a_alex_l2041 he's got a point this videos were horribly low resolution. regardless i was able to discern most of them. on the ones i missed however it would been nice if they weren't so low quality videos.
@@pwnomega4562Go to setting ⚙️, go to quality, and change the quality to your liking
You can change resolution in settings ⚙️
If only 50% of the videos are fake, that means I still get passing grade if I mark everything as fake
12/17 are fake, that's more than 50%
Last I remember 50% is not a passing grade.
@@LinkoftheDepths depends on the school
I think you're right - in the sense that all of them would be possible by ai
I had no idea things had gotten this good, and this was 5 months ago! This is legitimately scary. Kling is incredible
the first two and a half minutes really feel like an episode of interdimensional cable
0:23 - Two guys on the beach merging into one person. A hand with a thumb where the pinky finger should be. "I don't know about you, but this looks pretty real to me"
Not the AI bros glazing this video 😭
You know it's especially fake when you have to question "why the hell would someone take the time to professionally film something like that?".
There's no direction anywhere in the AI generations. No begginning Middle and end.
Please tell me why someone would film 7 but not 6, or 3 but 4.
I love how in the gymnastics one they just go through the floor like how mario goes into the paintings in super mario 64
Wow, I was so absolutely shocked that the sci-fi futuristic hallway wasn't real.
If you hadn’t kept asking if I thought this was real I would’ve thought all of them were real, except for the close-up of the old woman and the piano with two sets of hands.
You can still tell to a degree with elements of unrealistic or repeated motion . Hair & clothing for example.
16/17 no way i got the last one wrong :(
When you know there is a possibility of an AI generated content its super easy to spot it, but if you just showed me those videos without context i would not be able to tell at all
thx for sharing! the last one is tricky
Definitely i have lower score, but last one i started to thought about AI by looking on boots. For me it's was kinda weird motion blur.
no. it is NOT hard to tell when they are fake, unless you are blind. At least with these examples.
Great video! Only thing that bothered me was you asking if it’s real or AI generated after every video hahaha
14:19 cling looks awesome and pretty much better than anything pixar has done in their entire existence
well pixar is more about storytelling than anything else
You like CG slop "art". Good for you.
@@revisit8480thats you, ai art is better
No way, I got everything right! Who else?
Same
I only got 3 wrong, but u can clearly tell it’s ai based in the movement.
Its pretty easy to spot the AI and the real ones. got it 100% right without problems.
No it isn’t. Stop with the smug ego stroking.
@@Dennis-nc3vw no, it really is.
@@Dennis-nc3vw There plenty of giveaways in the small details/backgrounds of AI generated videos. So it's not hard to pick out if you look for the subtle thing (and sometimes not so subtle things) outside of the main focus. Lets say you have a prompt "Man eating an apple on a beach while sitting in chair"......If you focus on the man eating an apple, it will probably look real as that is where AI is going to throw in the most accurate detailing. But if you look at the background, you may see some wonky looking chairs, non realistic waves, maybe a building floating on the water....That sort of thing. If you look closer at facial muscle movements and hair movements, you will probably see some giveaways as well.
Point being, if you look at all the details in an AI video and not just at the main focus of the video, you will see stuff that doesn't make sense. Watch the video again with that in mind and you will see them as there are plenty of errors outside the main focus. AI is certainly getting more convincing, but if it isn't easy for you to spot things then that's simply because you aren't being observant enough.
😮😮😮...this is gonna get real crazy in a couple years for entertainment industry.
No reason to deal with actors and musicians....and also content creators.
The only thing that will be left is podcasts... Even journalism is becoming a generated product .😒