Jewish Book Week 2012 - Religion and Science

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3 Yrs since: The Great partnership; Science and Religion coexist as they make a glorious symphony of Life and Living. Humanity Now, Blessed memory Rabbi Jonathan Sacks.

  • @robelicit
    @robelicit 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm very impressed by the way all three were constantly doing an excellent job of pushing the overall understanding of the topics & questions forward rather than the defensive style of "try to win smart points" that is so common in conversations and debates when other people take on these topics; this discussion was enlightening on all subjects/perspectives/etc---all too many discussions by others that I have seen have had too much focus on "experts as experts" whereas in this video they ar focused on being teachers & learners that inspire & promote knowledge & searching & understanding.

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful Panel: The inclusion of a wide topic on the progressive of humanity has been quite engaging. Thank you very much.

  • @144Donn
    @144Donn 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you truly would like to learn, I'd suggest listening to a few more of Rabbi Sacks' videos on youtube. He often speaks of God's love for humanity and the humanistic nature of Judaism.

  • @2Granule
    @2Granule 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rambam (the famous Jewish philosopher in the 11th century of Egypt) was an Aristotelian. It is recognized that he was a 'Hellenized' Jew who wrote in Hebrew but seemed to have 'thought' in Greek.
    Sacks has a great revelation to give us!
    Good conversation. It ended too soon.

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you have any training in physics?

  • @MikeyL613
    @MikeyL613 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it possible to make a text transcription of this?

  • @earthwaterairspiritfireleb5482
    @earthwaterairspiritfireleb5482 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i talked to HaShem, he said he was feeling a bit non traditional, he said give up the guilt, just be a good person, everywhere will be blessed everything will work
    out, just let go, when i offered my burnt offerings, the grass began to grow thick, the river was beautiful, it was non traditional, it was happening freestyle,
    freestyle judaism, an endless stream of open source divine poetry addable to by anyone because everyone is God.

  • @דורוןפרנקו-ע4ש
    @דורוןפרנקו-ע4ש 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My view: GOD put law and order in the universe and nature, we humans put law and order in the society through our belief in GOD who gave us all of the laws and knowledge to understand his Creation of the universe and the laws of nature

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here's an honest answer. If something is too fuzzy or if I don't feel qualified to give an interesting accurate explanation, then, here's the surprise.... I SUSPEND MY JUDGMENT.
    If you know something I don't, please do share.

  • @mawalir937
    @mawalir937 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a lot of admiration for the late Rabbi Sacks; an accomplished man and a generally good man. Having said that my very lay persons, non-theistic view is that science and religion are entirely two different call it concepts. Religion asks that you put logic and reasoning aside and accept that certain things can't be proven. Science says dont put anything aside even if at the "present" time there is no explanation. It is a good effort for religion to adopt science as a practical matter after all religion uses science on a daily basis to move forward. For the great late Rabbi Sacks it was is important for religion to keep moving forward. For religion an effort to partnering with science is to buy time and provide this concept of religion the much needed oxygen as it were to keep moving forward as long as it can be sustained. Religion is terminal and sooner than later it will be dead and gone. The challenge for theologians like Rabbi Sacks is find whatever means necessary to buy more time.

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am filled with the evil spirit, as if a symbiote tries to take over and share my lowly existence.

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    what are you talking about?

  • @firasjawjad436
    @firasjawjad436 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:20. 13:48. 14:14

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you mean by "the law of nature", "god" and "logic". You simply asserted without justification. I could just as easily state: Satan is mathematics. God is the small-details. God is everything, hence god is water. God is a human. God is not unique. God is gravity. The common thread is: nonsense of the devil.

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    came into existence. What did god did on the 7-th day? In god's orders, innumerable people got speared with swords, burned alive, stoned to death made eat fire, and strangled until the bright light slapped them in the face. All this constitutes a record of a psycho with underwhelming resume that satan can only stand in awe. Shit and piss, may we all live in peace. The false god, yahweh will be, one day, removed like a bad habit from the minds of the gullible. The end, praise you Jebus (no typo).

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you mean by "changing the location of their body parts?" It's an intellectually unfair thing to get "science" from anti-Darwinist, since at there's the obvious danger of straw-man. Besides, if you think evolution is wrong, you should learn evolution from the scientists themselves.

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is string theory crap? It's simply unsupported idea, but was suggested from mathematical considerations. It may be a waste of time, but at least interesting on its own.
    There's no THE definition of logic; one should start from a set of axioms and then from that point build a consistent theory.

  • @noingabo
    @noingabo 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kundalini

  • @melese1988
    @melese1988 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    you're more about theoretical nonsense