i would use different drivers but your version is not bad at all. and they look amazing. i would use two dayton audio rs125p-8 for the midrange. the paper based membrane would probably have low dirty resonances in the upper frequency range above 2kHz. i would go for an M-T-M configuration with a Vifa/peerless XT300 KT/4 ring radiator. those tweeters are very smooth because of a low tube-like k3 distortion.
Holy doly, mate. This looks more like slapping speakers😂 I think best of your projects so far. Cost fortune but I believe that's not what matters this time. Well done again!
Ok. So I asked about the 7” version. Maybe with the Dayton audio reference (paper) 7” (x2 maybe) with the 7” epique sub and two 7” PR. Not sure about the amp though. I’d figure with it getting a signal from the receiver that either a passive network or two channel amp would work. I’d def like to hear a demo of this as a pair to see if a sub would even be needed. Even in the 5 1/2” version.
Great Erik. Snyggt. Stylish. Powerful. Umpf. Doff doff. Did you use the acrylic to beam light from a led on the amp board? Duratex better than MDF sealer? Great build.
Definitely would’ve used a different method of wiring up the speakers over soldering if something happens to one of the drivers you’d either have to cut the wire or break out the soldering iron, connectors would’ve been a decent option over soldering imo especially for maintenance or driver replacement even modern speakers use spade connectors.
looks nice! Just out of curiosity: for the center to center distance, would it not be better to move the active driver to the top opening, or is the XO that low it does not matter much?
i think the XO frequency is low enough. i guestimate 200Hz which would result in a wavelength of 1.5m. with that, it should be fine. lambda/4 is 37,5 cm. that is apptox. the distance. maybe there is a small dip in that area, that depends on the crossover as well. moving the crossover frequency - only from the sub - a bit up could resolve that.
Love the design! I was wondering if you did a calculation of the enclosures, I have the impression that the loudspeakers do not work in the optimal parameters due to the dimensions of the speakers. I think it should be bigger. Did you use any app for this? Thank you!
ja, aber der tang band breitbänder liefert einen glatten frequenzgang und aufgrund der papiermembran wenig aggressive resonanzen im hochtonbereich. der einsatz eines breitbänders bringt aufgrund seiner zeitrichtigen wiedergabe von mittel bis hochton eine hohe räumliche auflösung. der dayton subwoofer ist für diese größe ein super teil mit ungewöhnlich weiter linearer auslenkung und die passivmembranen lassen sich in der resonanzfrequenz sehr einfach abstimmen und produzieren bei ordentlicher bassleistung kein bassreflexrohrrauschen. alles in allem ein schlüssiges konzept.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
Beautiful. I'd love to see a passive build of these as a stereo pair.
i would use different drivers but your version is not bad at all.
and they look amazing.
i would use two dayton audio rs125p-8 for the midrange. the paper based membrane would probably have low dirty resonances in the upper frequency range above 2kHz.
i would go for an M-T-M configuration with a Vifa/peerless XT300 KT/4 ring radiator. those tweeters are very smooth because of a low tube-like k3 distortion.
You are an artist, I'm a fan of you perfect work!!!
Here we go again! Another banger from my favourite youtuber Erik did it!
Stunning craftsmanship!
Simply great work! These turned out very well!
Very nice design!!!
Holy doly, mate.
This looks more like slapping speakers😂 I think best of your projects so far. Cost fortune but I believe that's not what matters this time. Well done again!
Hey! How much?!
Listening in mono is just 😘 👌
Ok. So I asked about the 7” version. Maybe with the Dayton audio reference (paper) 7” (x2 maybe) with the 7” epique sub and two 7” PR. Not sure about the amp though. I’d figure with it getting a signal from the receiver that either a passive network or two channel amp would work. I’d def like to hear a demo of this as a pair to see if a sub would even be needed. Even in the 5 1/2” version.
nice build ! wish i made videos as compact as you haha. good job !!
Интересное решение и хорошее изготовление! Поздравляю!
Great Erik. Snyggt. Stylish. Powerful. Umpf. Doff doff. Did you use the acrylic to beam light from a led on the amp board? Duratex better than MDF sealer? Great build.
They are beautiful,what finish did you use.Thanks
Very nice , impressed.
Beautiful speaker. Where did you cross your sub and FR?
Beautiful but how is the sound ?
Definitely would’ve used a different method of wiring up the speakers over soldering if something happens to one of the drivers you’d either have to cut the wire or break out the soldering iron, connectors would’ve been a decent option over soldering imo especially for maintenance or driver replacement even modern speakers use spade connectors.
Thank you for your feedback
looks nice! Just out of curiosity: for the center to center distance, would it not be better to move the active driver to the top opening, or is the XO that low it does not matter much?
Thx! Great input, that is something I have to try when measuring the speaker and something I didn't even think about.
i think the XO frequency is low enough. i guestimate 200Hz which would result in a wavelength of 1.5m. with that, it should be fine. lambda/4 is 37,5 cm. that is apptox. the distance. maybe there is a small dip in that area, that depends on the crossover as well. moving the crossover frequency - only from the sub - a bit up could resolve that.
Nice job. Realy.
where is the other?
Subscribed!
Love the design! I was wondering if you did a calculation of the enclosures, I have the impression that the loudspeakers do not work in the optimal parameters due to the dimensions of the speakers. I think it should be bigger. Did you use any app for this? Thank you!
Thx! I always use winISD to calculate my speakers.
@@Erikdidit Good to know, thanks!
The use of passives are what allow for such a small enclosure.
@@jayweb702 it's a kind of alternative for big boxes?
@@HeretikLeathercraft Exactly!
Passive Aggressive. It looks like a transmission line box plus passives. Hmm. Bipolar? Regardless it looks really nice.
Your links do not go where there are meant to.
Baffle edges should all be rounded off.
How much money does it cost to build this tower?
Links are in the description
Your job is great, but the speakers principle is terribly wrong . . . .
👍🏼
Sound demo? It is totally worthless if the sound is not heard...
I have thought about posting a video with a few sound demos of my speakers. However I will post a frequency response on my website
@@Erikdidit OK, but the frequency response diagram alone doesn't tell you what kind of sound it has.
@@niof neither does a sound demo.
@@Erikdidit OK, then you don't have to do it.
Just don't watch it, problem solved.
😂😂 Lautsprecher müssen klingen. Nicht nur toll aussehen. Wird auch immer schlimmer!! Ist kein Möbelstück 😮😮
ja, aber der tang band breitbänder liefert einen glatten frequenzgang und aufgrund der papiermembran wenig aggressive resonanzen im hochtonbereich. der einsatz eines breitbänders bringt aufgrund seiner zeitrichtigen wiedergabe von mittel bis hochton eine hohe räumliche auflösung. der dayton subwoofer ist für diese größe ein super teil mit ungewöhnlich weiter linearer auslenkung und die passivmembranen lassen sich in der resonanzfrequenz sehr einfach abstimmen und produzieren bei ordentlicher bassleistung kein bassreflexrohrrauschen. alles in allem ein schlüssiges konzept.