Make sure to refer to reviews from the same website for accurate comparisons when comparing monitors on review websites like Rtings and TFTCentral! The testing methods used in reviews might differ. Also, below are a few monitor models recommended by Rtings. Don’t forget to check them out! Best Monitors for Gaming amzn.to/4div6fe amzn.to/3y9xwOx amzn.to/3WDWnn9 amzn.to/3WDs8MU amzn.to/4dgE0dd amzn.to/4cXcdyD amzn.to/4bYjME7 Best Monitors For Video Editing amzn.to/4cXGLAm amzn.to/3YCalHB amzn.to/3YheDDS amzn.to/3WmZVc0 amzn.to/4bYesR8 Best Monitors For Photo Editing amzn.to/3WlJA7j amzn.to/3Wj89li amzn.to/3Wj5gRE amzn.to/3Wn6yuI Best OLED Monitors amzn.to/3YkwASe amzn.to/3SjXKos amzn.to/3YjhoEJ Best 4k Gaming Monitors amzn.to/3yh0s7h amzn.to/3SpDx0f amzn.to/3SoHKRM amzn.to/3A8bnAz Best Monitors For PS5 amzn.to/3WDsN0Q amzn.to/3YjATgl amzn.to/4d8EMcs amzn.to/4fxsyvZ amzn.to/4cXd8PB Best Monitors For Xbox Series X amzn.to/4divhXW amzn.to/3WnDtPQ amzn.to/4dgEDU7 amzn.to/3Wn0ylS amzn.to/4dkmLrF Best Monitors For Programming amzn.to/3WgNuOV amzn.to/3yg8VaJ amzn.to/3SjCkYv amzn.to/3LFDcTx amzn.to/3yekgbm
I had seen 4 monitors in total side by side 2 dell one with va and other with ips and 2 benq one with va and other with IPS in these 4 the VAs had better color accuracy than the IPS and these are brand new monitors color calibrated at my office all same resolution and refresh rate they were used for designing artist for my company so I would always pick VA over IPS for contrast and color accuracy then a horrible IPS panel also his came to a shock to me the IPS has more color degradation when viewer from the side than the VA i double checked the models and confirmed that it was the IPS which turned a bit discolor when viewer from the side and not the VA IPS is just a huge marketing gimmick no one will realize it until they see them side by side like I did and the proof is also in rtings the measure color accuracy of pre and post calibrated TVs and monitors they reviewed are almost the same for IPS and VA screens
@@Krypterium PS5 is weaker than GTX1060 with RT cores of RTX 2060 it basically renders everything at 1080p medium or low settings it’s better to use a large TV with good built in upscaling and view it at least at 6 feet distance the 4k or 8k isn’t just a gimmick in PS5 check gamers nexus video for detailed breakdown if you game in ps5 with a monitor and use the same monitor connecting to a entry level gaming pc then you will regret the PS5 trust me I used to buy all PS5 just to play god of war then comparing it with my pc PS4 and PS5 feels horrible
You're the only example of an ai text to speech program being used that doesn't offend me. You clearly are putting genuine effort into your videos and use the ai in combination with the mask to maintain the mysterious vibe rather pump out random slop a computer thought would be a video.
I would advice to look for “smart” monitors or Oled smart TVs/monitors. If you only buy a “gaming” monitor, then you will need extra things with it (which is expected to be known by the buyer but I didn’t while buying my own). So the best thing to do is to buy something smart that works both as a TV and gaming monitor.
the narrator contiinues to be good at detailing stuff without getting into too much detail. He could explain more for the ones who want to know, but he still tells everything which is important. Very good YT channel.
I just discovered this channel like two days before, when I was trying to look for information to choose a laptop, since I love technology, but mostly I had been interested only in smartphones. But this guy and the easy way that he explains everything, the smoothness of the animation and the video in itself, I think is something that I would consider (and I consider) high quality and easy informative video. I would not even mind if he takes up to 20 or 30 minutes of video to explain about something due to his personality and nice explanations. Just wanted to share my good opinion with this guy! ❤ Thanks for adding the links to the products too!
Absolutely the best review channel in TH-cam. Only viable information in short and well explained manner without unnecessary bullshit. Perfectly understandable!!! Thank you for the great job and keep up the good work.
lol, mine is an AOC gaming g2 series adaptive sync, 27´, 240hz 0.5ms. No idea if that is related to the GTG or MPRT. Infact when i got it, i didnt know half the things i learned after Such as: 1. Why did i buy a 27inch monitor, along with a RTX4060 that is basically a 1080p card, and image looked a bit bad in big screen. 2. Why did i think i need a 240hz monitor, when 99.99% of games dont reach over 200fps. 3. Didnt check if it was G-sync compatible, (or knew the importance of it) since i was getting Nvidea card. Luckly had adpative sync, which wasnt even something i thought off. I managed to make it work, thankfully, by discovering DLDSR , that allowed me to switch and down-scale to a higher resolution, Adaptive sync worked well in terms of compatability. Phew! Always do research before you buy folks!! xD
i love how simple these videos are. it teaches beginners who might not know much, if anything at all, about technology and explains everything in detail while retaining a simple explanation that makes it easy for basically anyone to understand. even i learned some new things from watching this and i know quite a bit about tech. keep up the great work
You're half right about this. For example on a 240hz monitor it is ideal to have said 4.16 ms response time so the time needed to change from one frame to another is exactly 1Hz. But it's still entirely possible for the monitor to get less response time. If you ever look at a table of monitor's response time chart from tests (the 11x11 table used by monitors unboxed for example) you can see that some gray changes are easier for monitors to do, for example, low-high value to 0, and some are harder for the monitors to do, for example, 0 to mid to high value. And it's why the changes from the same start and end value are not recorded since the monitor didn't need to do anything. And we still didn't consider the "Overshoot" it generate that can lead to inverse ghosting on your monitor. And as stated in the video, OLED monitors do generate real 0.1 ms to 0.6 ms average response time, no matter how fast the refresh rate of the screen are. It's because unlike IPS panel, OLED change their gray value from one to another by turning the pixel off exactly at those 0.1 to 0.6 ms time before turning it on again to the desired gray value. Also as stated in the video, RTings website and Monitors Unboxed channel review many monitors and they both use a separate testing tool to check the monitor true color accuracy and response time.
You're mixing up the speed of the individual pixels with the actual monitor's latency, those are different things, a 240hz monitor can have a lower than 1ms response time, but the 4.16ms are always added to the latency. Also you don't need to be an engineer to calculate that.
Yeah. That's true about audio systems too! I used to own a Sony STR-DG500 receiver, which was advertised as delivering 100W x6 Channels in 8-Ohm. Later, I have bought another receiver: Harman Kardon AVR230 which only advertised 50W x7 Channels in 8-Ohm. So, I thought I'm giving up on some power in order to gain better audio quality. But, to my surprise, the Harman Kardon receiver sounded a lot louder! How's that possible? Obviously, Sony weren't advertising the real RMS watts, but some peak wattage, which is so misleading!
mini led is entirely different and has blooming effects which is a major disadvantage because of the local dimming zones. But microled is not widely avaiable because more expensive to manufacture
you didn`t mention OLED monitors cost several times more than LCD ones. So you gotta choose what you need. If you have money, definitely buy OLED, the picture quality is wayyy better. If dont wanna spend 2k on a monitor, LCD is your choice. Yes, the image is worse, but its not bad, especially if you compare the prices.
@@Khloya69You can find 27 inch 1440p 240hz oled monitors for 700 dollars now. They're matte and W-oled but I mean still Oled. I know 700 still isn't anywhere close to cheap but also nowhere near 2k😂
@@Khloya69 You can call them cheap on Television but on monitors they are expensive. That's why I committed a computer user will use a specific monitor for productivity or media and different for gaming.
@@PahEzThat's completely false , plus oled still have burn in issue their max life span is 5 year , while even cheap 100$ LG tv last upto 20 years then spending 2000$ and getting black bar in 6 months , ... Logitivity or colour accuracy everyone has different choices.
This is the first video of yours to be recommended to me and i got to say that this was a very well done vid, I understood everything very easily. You've got a new subscribe out of me,
I love your content so much... but this is a Pandora's box for me. I'm just a college freshmen as of the moment but when I make decisions on phones and technology, I've always thought that I'm limited on what I can afford and that any disatisfaction I have on my technology... is a product of my poverty and circumstances. This led me to develop envy and jealousy as well as determination to make a change, yet I cannot help but pity myself often times. Your content is like Pandora's box because it will forever guide me to make better decisions but also make my decision filled with regrets rather than self pity. Thank you and I hope I don't make another dumb decision as I slave away in my part time job.
Man I like your videos. Would you mind making a video about drones? I am not a lot deep into that field, but I'd definitely love to hear your thoughts and opinions about which drones you think are good, and what else.
Good video! We're also griping with the rise of high refresh rate LCD screens and everybody believing that Hz = FPS, which is really not true at all. Sure you can send as many frames as the LCD claims to accept digitally (their drivers are running at true 360Hz), but you're not going to see (record with high speed camera) 360 individually distinct images in a second of time if you were to send that many distinct images. The LCD would be showing a jumbled mess, because it's physically incapable of changing that fast. But it works with similar images, like frames of a motion picture or a video game. A CRT display running at 85Hz could in comparison display 85 distinct images in a second's time if that many were sent to it, but there could still be a bit of ghosting due to phosphors glowing for some time after the electron beam passes over them.
Tried looking up MicroLED monitors cause it sounded way too good to be real... there are no MicroLED monitors, shit. Oh well. Thanks for a very good quality reminder for myself after watching your previous monitor video a while ago about this stuff!
@@shaka2tuhonestly I still don’t got a clue what monitor to get 🤦♂️ been watching vids all day it’s midnight now , I got ps5 I just want a monitor god dman
@@jordanmarazzi if it for console then go for 144hz monitor and below. Nornally console only use 60fps and maybe 120fps? I dont know if console use 4k res tho. With low fsp maybe using mini-led is better for hdr.
10 Bits depth color... Yes, but nobody explains that the best monitor that you can buy NEVER reproduces all the colors that you see in reality. For me, it is important to go to a park or to the Forest every day to see the real colors (Take a look at the sky when the sun is rising or going down)
Very good explanation of differences! But I'm still struggling to choose. I want to buy both new monitor for PC and for TV. Was thinking to get some Alienware 360 HZ for gaming and QNED LG for TV. Would you or anyone in comments suggest anything better, price or quality wise from what market can offer?
In my experience, VAs have terrible ghosting even with all the black light or mprt settings set to max Meanwhile, while IPS still has some, it becomes minimal when the adjustments have been applied.
I'd probably mention "input lag" in a video like this. The only problem with input lag is that it's sensitive to testing method, so you can only compare oranges to oranges if you're looking at testing done on the same test equipment (which is probably the most valuable thing about Rtings). It's every bit as important as response time, probably more so. Also worth mentioning LG/Samsung "claim" to limit or mitigate burn-in risks... there is yet to be a breakthrough which actually does this very well though. If you work with static elements, you WILL get burn-in on OLED. HDR is broadly overrated, and somewhat deceptively marketed. Generally 8-bit has all the color depth anyone needs. The average eye sees 10m colors, 8bit is 16.7m. BUT... HDR is good for those who need to do professional visual work. Prior to HDR, it cost thousands of dollars to get a monitor which can handle the entire SRGB gamut. That's just standard 8-bit color, but very few monitors (except for exotic professional models) actually delivered the whole 8-bit spectrum. An HDR screen which claims to offer 10bit color... actually doesn't do that at all. BUT, it does _usually_ offer "all" or "most" of the SRGB spectrum. So, depending on brand, you can get HDR if you need a "pro" SRGB color gamut, at a much lower price. For most end-users though, using it in HDR mode is just jacking up the saturation as a gimmick. Oh, on the subject of color, IPS has the most accurate "hue", but not really the most accurate color. It's very washed out compared to VA or OLED. A color is "hue" + "value", IPS rocks hue, but fumbles value horribly. This makes your especially accurate "red" hue on an IPS, into a washed out pink, for example. It's difficult to call that "accurate" really. Also IPS glow - not even once. TN - bad color, bad viewing angles, very fast & cheap. (Asus made a unicorn TN panel with extra color bit depth a while back, which was actually really nice looking though) IPS - washed out, IPS glow, "decent-ish" in bright rooms. VA - tends to be slower, tends to get dark-smear, tends towards mediocre viewing angles. Great contrast though. OLED - perfect picture, but _nobody_ makes one which won't burn-in with desktop use. I opted for a mini-LED active-array VA, with incredibly fast response time & input lag (and no dark smear) for a VA panel (Neo G7 4k VA 32" panel, 120hz/144hz/165hz-with compression). The pixels are a bit small though unless you use scaling. I got a mount-arm to move it somewhat closer (above the kb) so that it _looks_ more like a 35 or 36" screen. It is "too" curved... but that's less noticeable with it moved closer. It ain't perfect, but it seemed like the best set of compromises at any price. (Best within "use case": visual work + gaming + tv, in a setting which is somewhat dim, eyesight 20/25, view distance about 4-5" closer than with a normal stand). My use pattern would absolutely burn-in an OLED, and this was the best of what's left.
I didn't really understood what is more important now MPRT or GTG? I have a 'gaming ' monitor and I checked it has 1ms MPRT and 12ms GTG, how do I rate that? I'm fully happy with my monitor it's 4 years old by now but still I was curios.
Some monitors can't be found on those websites to check the actual response time, I have 27GM610BF but I can find anything anywhere. Can someone help me out?
HDR is one giant gimmick. Every game has a different preset which may or may not conflict with the monitor's hdr, or the hdr settings in windows. And since everyone does it differently, that means you have to redo the hdr settings on every game almost every time. Give me HDR that just works natively with everything or else it will be nothing but a giant buzzword. Especially since some developers fuck it up to such a degree to the point that standard is better.
What about a good monitor for work - work from home, using laptop but considering buying a 24inch monitor to use as a main screen but no clue what. I currently use a portable screen via HDMI cable as a second screen. Mainly use Office for work, outlook, word etc so not bothered about all that other stuff lol. Also can you do a video on Tablets please - thinking of getting a Pixel Tablet. Thank you
Hello Sir, please can you tell which Monitor should I get (no Oled please) please tell me the one with highest reponse time no ghosting. Games I play: Cod,Valorant. best regards.
I wouldnt say they are lying. I would say its deceptive marketing. 1ms grey to grey is a real metric. Its just really easy to hit. Because its the change time of pixels but using the 10/90 metric. Meaning the first 10% and last 10% of a pixel transition is ignored, which is usually where the slowest part of the transition occurs. So a monitor will claim 1ms GTG but the full start to stop pixel response is 6ms or slower. Sadly MPRT is actually worse. As monitors that are 1mprt can have 13ms pixel responses and still meet the 1ms mprt standard. The example being the samsung chg70, a 1440p VA panel which has pixel response times in the 13ms range for black transitions. And you end up with black smearing. Technically GTG is the better standard. As displays that are 1ms GTG actually are 1ms MPRT. But displays stated to be 1ms MPRT may not be capable of the 1ms GTG standard. MPRT stands for motion picture response time. And typically it means you enable a black frame insertion mode which turns the backlight off/on in relation to the refresh rate cycle. Which can make motion seem clearer, but that doesnt meant the pixels are changing fast enough. That CHG70 has 13ms average pixel response (and in 20ms for some transitions). You can check out the ratings review if you dont believe me. 13ms average pixel response equates to a visual fidelity of 76.xx hz. Yet its a 144hz monitor. Yikes right? Meaning even if you enable the MPRT flicker backlight mode, you still have blurry picture and wrong colors because pixels dont change fast enough. I had the same issue with the blur busters approved viewsonic xg2431 display which is 240hz capable but pixel response is in the 5ms average range. Which results in a visual fidelity of about 200hz. Using BFI at 240hz SHOULD make the display feel like 480hz but because the pixels dont change fast enough, 240hz+BFI just feels like 200hz.... And 120hz is perfect but you might as well run native 240hz without BFI and get the same image quality.... The 60hz mode BFI is aids. Probably great for console but I played elden ring on the 60hz mode and it made my eyes tired extremely fast. So much so that i was fighting my brain to keep my eyes open. My brain trying to force my eyes shut and look away from the monitor. Like a spasm.... Anyway, MPRT and GTG are both meaningless to actual monitor performance. Which is why RTINGs exists. Sadly RTINGs newest reviews have a new rating system for pixel response which is extremely misleading. They used to have 3 graphs. GTG aka 10/90 which most people think is the one to look at, full pixel response which shows the full start to stop measurement (like chg70 having 13-20ms full times) and then a deviation chart showing any kind of rise/fall issues in pixel response like how chg70 has black smearing due to slow black transitions, that shows up in the deviation chart.... Now they homogenized the chart system and give you bad info in the new charts.... If a monitor reviewer wants to give accurate information, then full, 100%, start to stop times are all that matters for pixel response. How long does it take to complete a single transition. And then if pixel response is slower than refresh rate, then its a bad monitor. Period. Example being 240hz displays change 1hz/frame every 4.16ms. so full start-to-stop pixel response has to match or be faster than 4.16ms ( 3ms, 2ms, etc). Currently the fastest display tech is OLED. You can get 360hz oled with true sub 1ms pixel response times. Legit fastest pixel response of 0.1ms and slowest of 0.8ms.... meaning OLED currently is king. MicroLED doesnt exist yet in a small enough form factor. Those MicroLED TVs are literally 70+ inches and cannot fit into a 24-32 inch monitor size. And probably wont for the next 5 years. Making OLED the champion. And by the time MicroLED could be made small enough, we will have GaN displays (gallium nitride) which will replace OLED and have no burn in issues.
Man, oled monitors are so tempting, response time and colors are just so good Although the limited lifetime of those screens is such a no-factor for me. I want to use my display for ~3-5 years and then resell it for a cheaper upgrade and I'm not sure that is feasible with oled
Hey im looking at my first pc, planning on going with a AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6 Core 12 Thread Up To 4.6Ghz AM4 and a gigabyte GeForce RTX 4060 windforce 8gb with a gigabyte B550M DS3H AC AM4 MTX motherboard, will these work well together and is there anything specific i should upgrade? Cheers
Nice info👍❤️ Can you reaction audio IEM & HEADPHONES There's 3 difference categories -Commercial -Studio -Planar Tqvm.... hopefully to see you soon.. ❤❤❤
Tries to find response time for mpow wocka wocka mz5 plai monitor with 120hz hdr almost oled quality and flip out stand with built in battery and adjustable base on Amazon. 🤔
I'd say if there was a necessity of producing a MicroLED panesl and no other tech was possible we'd be having those in 1 or 2 years en masse. But since MicroLEDs have no disadvantages (as a display), in the current environment they'd wipe out LCDs, OLED, Qdots and all the rest if I forgot anything. Each and every manufacturer wouldn't want its carefully planned production plan to be interrupted by something that makes the stack obsolete. Maybe MicroLEDs production is planned in some capacity, but it looks like it is not happening in the next 5 years or so. For now it is more fruitful to milk OLEDs, because those are disposable, barely bright enough, can be mass-produced and very expensive.
I am glad you publicize the biggest lie about monitor response time. I have found out that by accident when I was looking for exact panel used in monitor I am interested in. That is probably cheapest 4K 144Hz IPS from AOC except Chinese only version (U27G3X). The list of panels used in wide range of monitors of different manufacturers shows that at least 90 percent of even so called high refresh monitors use typically 4 or 5ms g2g or MPRT (sry I am still confused). The rest of response time is so called overclock resulting in image and movement display issues. Those issues are probably just mitigated by some monitor software fixes either better or worse but never ideally. I am not definitely going for OLED as its lifetime looks really another dimension of the price☝️☝️☝️☝️. My old LG 22 inch TN panel is 2ms but mainly no single sub pixel dead after 11 years of intensive use and no degradation. Same " bad" TN as purchased. The best value of it was long term performance/image quality. Anyway I am quite ok with my AOC Q32P2 which is categorized as office monitor but features 75Hz ( another OC 😅) 4ms(some ghosting or whatever on movement is visible but overcome), mainly good price it waa below 300USD+VAT and has Adaptive sync forx gaming.
Bro i need an advice from you. Actually i am new at monitors buying, i thought i would buy a good monitor for my PS5 and i would play games like Gta 5 , GTA 6,RdR 2, COD and games like last of us. After watching your "Monitor vedio" i am really confused that which monitor should i buy now. I was thinking to buy a monutor like ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM 27" HDR Gaming Monitor, 280hz. Or Samsung Odyssey G5 QHD, 27", 165 hz, like this. Please suggest me a good monitor for my PS5,my budget is around 400$ and remember i wanna play games like Gta v or 6 and Cod and games like Last of us, RDR 2, Assassin Creed etc. Thanks ❤
am not happy with my (supposedly 10 bit HDR) asus vg259qm 240hz monitor. the color gamut doesnt even cover sRGB, let alone P3 color gamut. So you can have higher bit depth and hdr capability, and still not a good color gamut coverage. i used to think sRGB being quoted in specs meant good, only to find out it's a pretty bad/restricted color gamut designed for reduced colors on the web. Secondly, monitors can have high refresh rates, like mine, which can do 240hz or enable overclock to 280hz. Ghosting can be bad, as mentioned here, even at such high refresh rate, and because the monitor uses quite old hdmi/displayport version, you cant do the high refresh at the same time as hdr, as earlier revision of hdmi/displayport dont have the bandwidth. and at lower refresh rates the monitor response times and also input lag increase.
I bought a 60Hz monitor, and it broke after two years. Then I invested three times the price in a 144Hz monitor, and it broke after four years. I don’t know what to do anymore. Now I can play Diablo 4 without a PC or any HDMI cable! I just plug the AC into the monitor, and all I see is how I'm clearing the Pit in Diablo 4.
Even though i know about thes things from a time,cause of budget limits i went with an Lg Ips lcd monitor.I have a amoled phone but when it comes to chose the size of Monitor with micro led or Oled,the cost becomes a big problem.Even for a 24-27 inch monitor,prices compete to those of Most expensive hardware of a Pc build(GPU).So,in later future,when i could make some bucks enough out of my pc i will upgrade to oled or microled.
Yup found this out the hard way, AVOID MSI G32CQ5P 1440P Monitor, it has just enough ghosting to create hella eye strain and has no business being a 1440p gaming monitor.
Make sure to refer to reviews from the same website for accurate comparisons when comparing monitors on review websites like Rtings and TFTCentral! The testing methods used in reviews might differ. Also, below are a few monitor models recommended by Rtings. Don’t forget to check them out!
Best Monitors for Gaming
amzn.to/4div6fe
amzn.to/3y9xwOx
amzn.to/3WDWnn9
amzn.to/3WDs8MU
amzn.to/4dgE0dd
amzn.to/4cXcdyD
amzn.to/4bYjME7
Best Monitors For Video Editing
amzn.to/4cXGLAm
amzn.to/3YCalHB
amzn.to/3YheDDS
amzn.to/3WmZVc0
amzn.to/4bYesR8
Best Monitors For Photo Editing
amzn.to/3WlJA7j
amzn.to/3Wj89li
amzn.to/3Wj5gRE
amzn.to/3Wn6yuI
Best OLED Monitors
amzn.to/3YkwASe
amzn.to/3SjXKos
amzn.to/3YjhoEJ
Best 4k Gaming Monitors
amzn.to/3yh0s7h
amzn.to/3SpDx0f
amzn.to/3SoHKRM
amzn.to/3A8bnAz
Best Monitors For PS5
amzn.to/3WDsN0Q
amzn.to/3YjATgl
amzn.to/4d8EMcs
amzn.to/4fxsyvZ
amzn.to/4cXd8PB
Best Monitors For Xbox Series X
amzn.to/4divhXW
amzn.to/3WnDtPQ
amzn.to/4dgEDU7
amzn.to/3Wn0ylS
amzn.to/4dkmLrF
Best Monitors For Programming
amzn.to/3WgNuOV
amzn.to/3yg8VaJ
amzn.to/3SjCkYv
amzn.to/3LFDcTx
amzn.to/3yekgbm
Where can I buy that mask that you use ?
I had seen 4 monitors in total side by side 2 dell one with va and other with ips and 2 benq one with va and other with IPS in these 4 the VAs had better color accuracy than the IPS and these are brand new monitors color calibrated at my office all same resolution and refresh rate they were used for designing artist for my company so I would always pick VA over IPS for contrast and color accuracy then a horrible IPS panel also his came to a shock to me the IPS has more color degradation when viewer from the side than the VA i double checked the models and confirmed that it was the IPS which turned a bit discolor when viewer from the side and not the VA IPS is just a huge marketing gimmick no one will realize it until they see them side by side like I did and the proof is also in rtings the measure color accuracy of pre and post calibrated TVs and monitors they reviewed are almost the same for IPS and VA screens
there are way better monitors than the ones u mentioned for PS5…
@@Krypterium PS5 is weaker than GTX1060 with RT cores of RTX 2060 it basically renders everything at 1080p medium or low settings it’s better to use a large TV with good built in upscaling and view it at least at 6 feet distance the 4k or 8k isn’t just a gimmick in PS5 check gamers nexus video for detailed breakdown if you game in ps5 with a monitor and use the same monitor connecting to a entry level gaming pc then you will regret the PS5 trust me I used to buy all PS5 just to play god of war then comparing it with my pc PS4 and PS5 feels horrible
I remember watching one of your videos about processor suffix and you were at less than 100k , now you are over 200k 🎉
You're the only example of an ai text to speech program being used that doesn't offend me. You clearly are putting genuine effort into your videos and use the ai in combination with the mask to maintain the mysterious vibe rather pump out random slop a computer thought would be a video.
💯 agreed!
Yeah, it's good use case for AI which is complementing the talent of the human
I didn't even know he was using Ai lol
Bro sounds genuine
@@ywtv6🤦♂️
The more I learn about monitors/TVs the more confusing choosing a good one gets. Great informative video!!
tv is eazy to choose
Yeah it's like the more you know the more decisive you get
Chill just focus on IPS LED display or Microled display that's all his point , don't buy after seeing Refresh rate.
@@Andreas.r2 IPS is LCD, not LED. OLED is LED
I would advice to look for “smart” monitors or Oled smart TVs/monitors. If you only buy a “gaming” monitor, then you will need extra things with it (which is expected to be known by the buyer but I didn’t while buying my own). So the best thing to do is to buy something smart that works both as a TV and gaming monitor.
the narrator contiinues to be good at detailing stuff without getting into too much detail. He could explain more for the ones who want to know, but he still tells everything which is important. Very good YT channel.
I just discovered this channel like two days before, when I was trying to look for information to choose a laptop, since I love technology, but mostly I had been interested only in smartphones. But this guy and the easy way that he explains everything, the smoothness of the animation and the video in itself, I think is something that I would consider (and I consider) high quality and easy informative video. I would not even mind if he takes up to 20 or 30 minutes of video to explain about something due to his personality and nice explanations. Just wanted to share my good opinion with this guy! ❤
Thanks for adding the links to the products too!
Bro remembered his TH-cam channel password 🔑
Lol
2:32:59
This is the best TH-cam Channel on explaining something so good. Keep it Up i love these videos! ❤
Absolutely the best review channel in TH-cam. Only viable information in short and well explained manner without unnecessary bullshit. Perfectly understandable!!! Thank you for the great job and keep up the good work.
it's gpt-4
lol, mine is an AOC gaming g2 series adaptive sync, 27´, 240hz 0.5ms. No idea if that is related to the GTG or MPRT. Infact when i got it, i didnt know half the things i learned after Such as:
1. Why did i buy a 27inch monitor, along with a RTX4060 that is basically a 1080p card, and image looked a bit bad in big screen.
2. Why did i think i need a 240hz monitor, when 99.99% of games dont reach over 200fps.
3. Didnt check if it was G-sync compatible, (or knew the importance of it) since i was getting Nvidea card. Luckly had adpative sync, which wasnt even something i thought off.
I managed to make it work, thankfully, by discovering DLDSR , that allowed me to switch and down-scale to a higher resolution, Adaptive sync worked well in terms of compatability. Phew! Always do research before you buy folks!! xD
i love how simple these videos are. it teaches beginners who might not know much, if anything at all, about technology and explains everything in detail while retaining a simple explanation that makes it easy for basically anyone to understand. even i learned some new things from watching this and i know quite a bit about tech. keep up the great work
Best description of gtg and mprt. Read an article and made no sense. Was more confused than before 😂
As an engineer its indeed a lie. For example 240 hz means 1/240 s = 1000/240 ms ≈ 4.16 ms so anything lower than that on a 240 hz monitor is a lie
Which also means any 240hz screen with a response time of more than 4.16 ms is not really recommendable😂
Gtg is the delay between 2 commands. So 1ms is 4.16 + 1 basically.
Thanks for teaching me something new😊👍
You're half right about this. For example on a 240hz monitor it is ideal to have said 4.16 ms response time so the time needed to change from one frame to another is exactly 1Hz. But it's still entirely possible for the monitor to get less response time.
If you ever look at a table of monitor's response time chart from tests (the 11x11 table used by monitors unboxed for example) you can see that some gray changes are easier for monitors to do, for example, low-high value to 0, and some are harder for the monitors to do, for example, 0 to mid to high value. And it's why the changes from the same start and end value are not recorded since the monitor didn't need to do anything. And we still didn't consider the "Overshoot" it generate that can lead to inverse ghosting on your monitor.
And as stated in the video, OLED monitors do generate real 0.1 ms to 0.6 ms average response time, no matter how fast the refresh rate of the screen are. It's because unlike IPS panel, OLED change their gray value from one to another by turning the pixel off exactly at those 0.1 to 0.6 ms time before turning it on again to the desired gray value.
Also as stated in the video, RTings website and Monitors Unboxed channel review many monitors and they both use a separate testing tool to check the monitor true color accuracy and response time.
You're mixing up the speed of the individual pixels with the actual monitor's latency, those are different things, a 240hz monitor can have a lower than 1ms response time, but the 4.16ms are always added to the latency. Also you don't need to be an engineer to calculate that.
Yeah.
That's true about audio systems too!
I used to own a Sony STR-DG500 receiver, which was advertised as delivering 100W x6 Channels in 8-Ohm.
Later, I have bought another receiver: Harman Kardon AVR230 which only advertised 50W x7 Channels in 8-Ohm.
So, I thought I'm giving up on some power in order to gain better audio quality.
But, to my surprise, the Harman Kardon receiver sounded a lot louder!
How's that possible?
Obviously, Sony weren't advertising the real RMS watts, but some peak wattage, which is so misleading!
The info you showed in brackets in 6:46 is very helpful. I thought that mini led and micro led are the same until I saw that. Thanks
mini led is entirely different and has blooming effects which is a major disadvantage because of the local dimming zones. But microled is not widely avaiable because more expensive to manufacture
you didn`t mention OLED monitors cost several times more than LCD ones. So you gotta choose what you need. If you have money, definitely buy OLED, the picture quality is wayyy better. If dont wanna spend 2k on a monitor, LCD is your choice. Yes, the image is worse, but its not bad, especially if you compare the prices.
Oleds don’t cost 2k anymore, even the new 4k 240hz OLEDs are cheaper than that.
@@Khloya69You can find 27 inch 1440p 240hz oled monitors for 700 dollars now. They're matte and W-oled but I mean still Oled. I know 700 still isn't anywhere close to cheap but also nowhere near 2k😂
Some LCD garbage costs more than some premium Oled monitors. LCDs gonna be completely irrelevant in less than 10 years
@@Khloya69 You can call them cheap on Television but on monitors they are expensive. That's why I committed a computer user will use a specific monitor for productivity or media and different for gaming.
@@PahEzThat's completely false , plus oled still have burn in issue their max life span is 5 year , while even cheap 100$ LG tv last upto 20 years then spending 2000$ and getting black bar in 6 months , ...
Logitivity or colour accuracy everyone has different choices.
Your wisdom is much appreciated. I'm glad to watch your channel. Now I can shop for a great monitor.
and once again the mysterious tech cooks with a great informative easy to understand video keep up the work
I love your straightforward and accurate approach to technology. I hope you’ll talk about headsets and earbuds in a future video.
This is the first video of yours to be recommended to me and i got to say that this was a very well done vid, I understood everything very easily. You've got a new subscribe out of me,
I saw your very first video & like a peasant fool i didn't save or sub. Been trying to find ya ever since🙏
Stay Outta Yaself n Carry On Mate!🔥🤝
bro ur videos are so good! u give 100% knowledge and 0% bull crap
keep it up
I love your content so much... but this is a Pandora's box for me. I'm just a college freshmen as of the moment but when I make decisions on phones and technology, I've always thought that I'm limited on what I can afford and that any disatisfaction I have on my technology... is a product of my poverty and circumstances. This led me to develop envy and jealousy as well as determination to make a change, yet I cannot help but pity myself often times. Your content is like Pandora's box because it will forever guide me to make better decisions but also make my decision filled with regrets rather than self pity. Thank you and I hope I don't make another dumb decision as I slave away in my part time job.
i think you misunderstood what the term 'pandora's box' meant
Man I like your videos. Would you mind making a video about drones? I am not a lot deep into that field, but I'd definitely love to hear your thoughts and opinions about which drones you think are good, and what else.
???????????
Good stuff, subbed. Well explained and nicely animated!
Good video! We're also griping with the rise of high refresh rate LCD screens and everybody believing that Hz = FPS, which is really not true at all. Sure you can send as many frames as the LCD claims to accept digitally (their drivers are running at true 360Hz), but you're not going to see (record with high speed camera) 360 individually distinct images in a second of time if you were to send that many distinct images. The LCD would be showing a jumbled mess, because it's physically incapable of changing that fast. But it works with similar images, like frames of a motion picture or a video game. A CRT display running at 85Hz could in comparison display 85 distinct images in a second's time if that many were sent to it, but there could still be a bit of ghosting due to phosphors glowing for some time after the electron beam passes over them.
You saved me alot of time with this breakdown. Thank you, kind sir!
The Tech channel with the manliest voice over !
The production quality of your videos is genuenly impressive. the video is a delight to watch (I'm not a bot) they are also very educational.
this is ai generated
Tried looking up MicroLED monitors cause it sounded way too good to be real... there are no MicroLED monitors, shit. Oh well.
Thanks for a very good quality reminder for myself after watching your previous monitor video a while ago about this stuff!
Looking for a new monitor is a freaking nightmare compared to building a damn PC. Jesus...
Yeah, should i go hdr but with little ghosting or ips but no hdr😂
@@shaka2tuhonestly I still don’t got a clue what monitor to get 🤦♂️ been watching vids all day it’s midnight now , I got ps5 I just want a monitor god dman
@@jordanmarazzi if it for console then go for 144hz monitor and below.
Nornally console only use 60fps and maybe 120fps?
I dont know if console use 4k res tho.
With low fsp maybe using mini-led is better for hdr.
Respect for this mysterious guy❤
The lower gtg, it doesn't mean mprt will be lower aswell, but the lower the mprt, the lower gtg can go aswell
Good stuff as always brother..
“Absolutely loved this video, It was truly inspiring. I’d also love to see a video about computer hardware in the future. Keep up the fantastic work!”
10 Bits depth color... Yes, but nobody explains that the best monitor that you can buy NEVER reproduces all the colors that you see in reality. For me, it is important to go to a park or to the Forest every day to see the real colors (Take a look at the sky when the sun is rising or going down)
You can increase its saturation in its settings to increase color accuracy
@@Gamebro321are you actually crazy, increasing saturation does exactly the opposite 😂
Colors by default are desaturated to make it possible for a display that can not reproduce saturated colors to display all colors.
@@Gamebro321 no, they are actually mostly saturated on the majority of displays.
But the trees at my park all dead
Nice and informative as usual! Thank you for producing such high quality videos for us!
Very good explanation of differences! But I'm still struggling to choose.
I want to buy both new monitor for PC and for TV. Was thinking to get some Alienware 360 HZ for gaming and QNED LG for TV. Would you or anyone in comments suggest anything better, price or quality wise from what market can offer?
You are like a teacher to me! Thank you
At last I know what I really want... More of your content.
So inshort if I'm going for an Oled monitor i should go for samsung or lg?
In my experience, VAs have terrible ghosting even with all the black light or mprt settings set to max
Meanwhile, while IPS still has some, it becomes minimal when the adjustments have been applied.
I'd probably mention "input lag" in a video like this. The only problem with input lag is that it's sensitive to testing method, so you can only compare oranges to oranges if you're looking at testing done on the same test equipment (which is probably the most valuable thing about Rtings).
It's every bit as important as response time, probably more so.
Also worth mentioning LG/Samsung "claim" to limit or mitigate burn-in risks... there is yet to be a breakthrough which actually does this very well though. If you work with static elements, you WILL get burn-in on OLED.
HDR is broadly overrated, and somewhat deceptively marketed. Generally 8-bit has all the color depth anyone needs. The average eye sees 10m colors, 8bit is 16.7m. BUT... HDR is good for those who need to do professional visual work. Prior to HDR, it cost thousands of dollars to get a monitor which can handle the entire SRGB gamut. That's just standard 8-bit color, but very few monitors (except for exotic professional models) actually delivered the whole 8-bit spectrum. An HDR screen which claims to offer 10bit color... actually doesn't do that at all. BUT, it does _usually_ offer "all" or "most" of the SRGB spectrum. So, depending on brand, you can get HDR if you need a "pro" SRGB color gamut, at a much lower price. For most end-users though, using it in HDR mode is just jacking up the saturation as a gimmick.
Oh, on the subject of color, IPS has the most accurate "hue", but not really the most accurate color. It's very washed out compared to VA or OLED. A color is "hue" + "value", IPS rocks hue, but fumbles value horribly. This makes your especially accurate "red" hue on an IPS, into a washed out pink, for example. It's difficult to call that "accurate" really. Also IPS glow - not even once.
TN - bad color, bad viewing angles, very fast & cheap. (Asus made a unicorn TN panel with extra color bit depth a while back, which was actually really nice looking though)
IPS - washed out, IPS glow, "decent-ish" in bright rooms.
VA - tends to be slower, tends to get dark-smear, tends towards mediocre viewing angles. Great contrast though.
OLED - perfect picture, but _nobody_ makes one which won't burn-in with desktop use.
I opted for a mini-LED active-array VA, with incredibly fast response time & input lag (and no dark smear) for a VA panel (Neo G7 4k VA 32" panel, 120hz/144hz/165hz-with compression). The pixels are a bit small though unless you use scaling. I got a mount-arm to move it somewhat closer (above the kb) so that it _looks_ more like a 35 or 36" screen. It is "too" curved... but that's less noticeable with it moved closer. It ain't perfect, but it seemed like the best set of compromises at any price. (Best within "use case": visual work + gaming + tv, in a setting which is somewhat dim, eyesight 20/25, view distance about 4-5" closer than with a normal stand). My use pattern would absolutely burn-in an OLED, and this was the best of what's left.
Finally another video
man thanks . you are surely very underrated
Can you explain why monitors suddenly turn black for 2-3 seconds before returning to normal please?
What monitor would you recommend for the ps5?
Great explanation and correct infromation!
Can u find anything on vg279ql3a Asus tuf. Cant find the actual respons time that ur mentioning in this video?. Not the gtg and mprt.
ram cl and everything you can tell . please in the future . and thank's this was a great help
I didn't really understood what is more important now MPRT or GTG? I have a 'gaming ' monitor and I checked it has 1ms MPRT and 12ms GTG, how do I rate that? I'm fully happy with my monitor it's 4 years old by now but still I was curios.
Some monitors can't be found on those websites to check the actual response time, I have 27GM610BF but I can find anything anywhere.
Can someone help me out?
I would like you make a video about what kind if TV one should buy or not buy and give us their advantage and disadvantage
Great video !!! New sub!!!💪🏾
How do you create the voice.. ? Advise the tool please..
This is awesome and useful content thank you for great content.
More videos about CPU in PCs
HDR is one giant gimmick. Every game has a different preset which may or may not conflict with the monitor's hdr, or the hdr settings in windows.
And since everyone does it differently, that means you have to redo the hdr settings on every game almost every time.
Give me HDR that just works natively with everything or else it will be nothing but a giant buzzword. Especially since some developers fuck it up to such a degree to the point that standard is better.
The smart thing would be to use RTINGS to find the monitor you want with validated test results.
kral sen çok zekisin tr kanalından daha kısa sürede ve daha çok aboneye gelmişsin helal olsun
Over 200,000 people enjoy your content, don’t forget this channel :)
What about a good monitor for work - work from home, using laptop but considering buying a 24inch monitor to use as a main screen but no clue what. I currently use a portable screen via HDMI cable as a second screen. Mainly use Office for work, outlook, word etc so not bothered about all that other stuff lol.
Also can you do a video on Tablets please - thinking of getting a Pixel Tablet.
Thank you
You have earned a new subscriber.
"If you dont wanna join Overpayers Club" at this moment all apple products buyers left.
awesome video, you made so professional
Amazing video thanks!!!😮😊
In terms of reliability is it safe to say LEDs are more reliable than OLED for the long term?
I love your channel!
Also the 1ms is with overdrive settings crankrd to the max. Wich s unplayable
If we have more people like this guy most of big companies will be broke 👍👍
Hello Sir, please can you tell which Monitor should I get (no Oled please) please tell me the one with highest reponse time no ghosting. Games I play: Cod,Valorant. best regards.
i trust this man more than anyone else on the internet
So if I buy a monitor with OLED or MicroLED panel ... afrer 2 or 3 years will be over with it?
isn't the Oled more superior in terms of picture quality compared to micro LED?
I wouldnt say they are lying. I would say its deceptive marketing. 1ms grey to grey is a real metric. Its just really easy to hit. Because its the change time of pixels but using the 10/90 metric. Meaning the first 10% and last 10% of a pixel transition is ignored, which is usually where the slowest part of the transition occurs. So a monitor will claim 1ms GTG but the full start to stop pixel response is 6ms or slower.
Sadly MPRT is actually worse. As monitors that are 1mprt can have 13ms pixel responses and still meet the 1ms mprt standard. The example being the samsung chg70, a 1440p VA panel which has pixel response times in the 13ms range for black transitions. And you end up with black smearing.
Technically GTG is the better standard. As displays that are 1ms GTG actually are 1ms MPRT. But displays stated to be 1ms MPRT may not be capable of the 1ms GTG standard.
MPRT stands for motion picture response time. And typically it means you enable a black frame insertion mode which turns the backlight off/on in relation to the refresh rate cycle. Which can make motion seem clearer, but that doesnt meant the pixels are changing fast enough.
That CHG70 has 13ms average pixel response (and in 20ms for some transitions). You can check out the ratings review if you dont believe me. 13ms average pixel response equates to a visual fidelity of 76.xx hz. Yet its a 144hz monitor. Yikes right? Meaning even if you enable the MPRT flicker backlight mode, you still have blurry picture and wrong colors because pixels dont change fast enough. I had the same issue with the blur busters approved viewsonic xg2431 display which is 240hz capable but pixel response is in the 5ms average range. Which results in a visual fidelity of about 200hz. Using BFI at 240hz SHOULD make the display feel like 480hz but because the pixels dont change fast enough, 240hz+BFI just feels like 200hz.... And 120hz is perfect but you might as well run native 240hz without BFI and get the same image quality.... The 60hz mode BFI is aids. Probably great for console but I played elden ring on the 60hz mode and it made my eyes tired extremely fast. So much so that i was fighting my brain to keep my eyes open. My brain trying to force my eyes shut and look away from the monitor. Like a spasm....
Anyway, MPRT and GTG are both meaningless to actual monitor performance. Which is why RTINGs exists.
Sadly RTINGs newest reviews have a new rating system for pixel response which is extremely misleading. They used to have 3 graphs. GTG aka 10/90 which most people think is the one to look at, full pixel response which shows the full start to stop measurement (like chg70 having 13-20ms full times) and then a deviation chart showing any kind of rise/fall issues in pixel response like how chg70 has black smearing due to slow black transitions, that shows up in the deviation chart.... Now they homogenized the chart system and give you bad info in the new charts....
If a monitor reviewer wants to give accurate information, then full, 100%, start to stop times are all that matters for pixel response. How long does it take to complete a single transition. And then if pixel response is slower than refresh rate, then its a bad monitor. Period. Example being 240hz displays change 1hz/frame every 4.16ms. so full start-to-stop pixel response has to match or be faster than 4.16ms ( 3ms, 2ms, etc).
Currently the fastest display tech is OLED. You can get 360hz oled with true sub 1ms pixel response times. Legit fastest pixel response of 0.1ms and slowest of 0.8ms.... meaning OLED currently is king. MicroLED doesnt exist yet in a small enough form factor. Those MicroLED TVs are literally 70+ inches and cannot fit into a 24-32 inch monitor size. And probably wont for the next 5 years. Making OLED the champion. And by the time MicroLED could be made small enough, we will have GaN displays (gallium nitride) which will replace OLED and have no burn in issues.
So understanding 👍
Man, oled monitors are so tempting, response time and colors are just so good
Although the limited lifetime of those screens is such a no-factor for me. I want to use my display for ~3-5 years and then resell it for a cheaper upgrade and I'm not sure that is feasible with oled
Hey im looking at my first pc, planning on going with a AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6 Core 12 Thread Up To 4.6Ghz AM4 and a gigabyte GeForce RTX 4060 windforce 8gb with a gigabyte B550M DS3H AC AM4 MTX motherboard, will these work well together and is there anything specific i should upgrade? Cheers
look to upgrading to a ryzen 5800x3d for gaming
go for 58003xd, no point in buying anything less, believe me
Being early to this guys videos is like finding diamonds
What if MPRT is lower than GTG?
Bro ı need a computer and the prossers ended HS this is good or bad
For example ryzen-7735hs
İ know prossers ended by h this good but this prossesor ended HS this is good or bad pls answer me
Can you make a video about drivers and windows update that would make some PC or laptop into BSOD please?
Nice info👍❤️
Can you reaction audio IEM & HEADPHONES
There's 3 difference categories
-Commercial
-Studio
-Planar
Tqvm.... hopefully to see you soon..
❤❤❤
Tries to find response time for mpow wocka wocka mz5 plai monitor with 120hz hdr almost oled quality and flip out stand with built in battery and adjustable base on Amazon. 🤔
I'd say if there was a necessity of producing a MicroLED panesl and no other tech was possible we'd be having those in 1 or 2 years en masse.
But since MicroLEDs have no disadvantages (as a display), in the current environment they'd wipe out LCDs, OLED, Qdots and all the rest if I forgot anything.
Each and every manufacturer wouldn't want its carefully planned production plan to be interrupted by something that makes the stack obsolete. Maybe MicroLEDs production is planned in some capacity, but it looks like it is not happening in the next 5 years or so. For now it is more fruitful to milk OLEDs, because those are disposable, barely bright enough, can be mass-produced and very expensive.
He back bois 🎉
Crt monitors were faster. In terms of response time.
I am glad you publicize the biggest lie about monitor response time.
I have found out that by accident when I was looking for exact panel used in monitor I am interested in.
That is probably cheapest 4K 144Hz IPS from AOC except Chinese only version (U27G3X).
The list of panels used in wide range of monitors of different manufacturers shows that at least 90 percent of even so called high refresh monitors use typically 4 or 5ms g2g or MPRT (sry I am still confused).
The rest of response time is so called overclock resulting in image and movement display issues. Those issues are probably just mitigated by some monitor software fixes either better or worse but never ideally.
I am not definitely going for OLED as its lifetime looks really another dimension of the price☝️☝️☝️☝️.
My old LG 22 inch TN panel is 2ms but mainly no single sub pixel dead after 11 years of intensive use and no degradation. Same " bad" TN as purchased. The best value of it was long term performance/image quality.
Anyway I am quite ok with my AOC Q32P2 which is categorized as office monitor but features 75Hz ( another OC 😅) 4ms(some ghosting or whatever on movement is visible but overcome), mainly good price it waa below 300USD+VAT and has Adaptive sync forx gaming.
Bro i need an advice from you. Actually i am new at monitors buying, i thought i would buy a good monitor for my PS5 and i would play games like Gta 5 , GTA 6,RdR 2, COD and games like last of us. After watching your "Monitor vedio" i am really confused that which monitor should i buy now. I was thinking to buy a monutor like
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM 27" HDR Gaming Monitor, 280hz.
Or
Samsung Odyssey G5 QHD, 27", 165 hz, like this.
Please suggest me a good monitor for my PS5,my budget is around 400$ and remember i wanna play games like Gta v or 6 and Cod and games like Last of us, RDR 2, Assassin Creed etc.
Thanks ❤
whats QLed?
It is normally led, but with the quantum dot colour filter gives vibrant colours.
am not happy with my (supposedly 10 bit HDR) asus vg259qm 240hz monitor.
the color gamut doesnt even cover sRGB, let alone P3 color gamut. So you can have higher bit depth and hdr capability, and still not a good color gamut coverage. i used to think sRGB being quoted in specs meant good, only to find out it's a pretty bad/restricted color gamut designed for reduced colors on the web.
Secondly, monitors can have high refresh rates, like mine, which can do 240hz or enable overclock to 280hz. Ghosting can be bad, as mentioned here, even at such high refresh rate, and because the monitor uses quite old hdmi/displayport version, you cant do the high refresh at the same time as hdr, as earlier revision of hdmi/displayport dont have the bandwidth. and at lower refresh rates the monitor response times and also input lag increase.
Bro almost forgot about this channel password 💀
What?
I bought a 60Hz monitor, and it broke after two years. Then I invested three times the price in a 144Hz monitor, and it broke after four years. I don’t know what to do anymore.
Now I can play Diablo 4 without a PC or any HDMI cable! I just plug the AC into the monitor, and all I see is how I'm clearing the Pit in Diablo 4.
Good work 💯
Please make video on external and internal SSD
Hey can you please make a watch this before buying a Tablet video I'm thinking of getting one your advice will help a lot
Even though i know about thes things from a time,cause of budget limits i went with an Lg Ips lcd monitor.I have a amoled phone but when it comes to chose the size of Monitor with micro led or Oled,the cost becomes a big problem.Even for a 24-27 inch monitor,prices compete to those of Most expensive hardware of a Pc build(GPU).So,in later future,when i could make some bucks enough out of my pc i will upgrade to oled or microled.
my asus tuf 4k monitor says that it's 5ms. what it really is is 10-12ms. complete lie
Does someone know good monitor for ps5?
Every panel got problems
Ai generated voice?
Yup found this out the hard way, AVOID MSI G32CQ5P 1440P Monitor, it has just enough ghosting to create hella eye strain and has no business being a 1440p gaming monitor.
Its a VA display, what did you expect?
@@JubbLaRacingyeah, va display is for video/media consumption mostly used in tvs.