Russia's Tu-95 Bomber Is No Joke (Even If She Is Old)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ค. 2024
  • In today’s session we will discuss some reasons Why the Tu-95 Bear Has Been in Service for So Long. Best known by its NATO codename as the Bear, the Soviet Tu-95 was the most distinctive aircraft of the Cold War. It first flew in 1952, like Britain's Avro Vulcan and America's Boeing B-52, which are still in service to this day. The aircraft will be upgraded to keep it in operation until at least the 2040s, giving it a near 100-year service history in the Russian Air Force. Here are some reasons why this aircraft has been operated for so long.
    All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
    / militarytv.channel
    defense-tv.com/
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 163

  • @bryanong6570
    @bryanong6570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +151

    Probably the main reason its still in service is due to its high reliability, like the 52, and probably lower cost to operate per hour compared to others.

    • @abdiganiaden
      @abdiganiaden 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Also if they can be be outfitted with stand off weapons with long range cruise missiles so it doesn’t have to go into danger zone, just close enough is good enough like 52.
      It’s the long range missiles that keep these old bombers still in service, if no long range missiles then they would be useless.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@abdiganiaden
      Exactly.
      The BVR missiles are making these old machine useful.
      H6 bomber is an example too.

    • @protorhinocerator142
      @protorhinocerator142 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's like a slightly smaller B-52. There are a lot of similarities.

    • @user-jj2dk5ew9j
      @user-jj2dk5ew9j 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      us a bomber is very good , but us a passinger west said is bad!!

  • @RasPutintheGreat
    @RasPutintheGreat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    Reliable, proven, performance, engineered very well, hell this plane outlived it's designers, creators and even pilots...

    • @simkahop8519
      @simkahop8519 ปีที่แล้ว

      et have been made with - Stalin, first flight 12 novembre 1952, while Stalin hawe been dead in ars 1953, so ty 95 , It is Airplane yet - Stalinian. 🤔😎😎 - In Service and modernised of course, but - untill today.🤔😎

    • @mia1shooter
      @mia1shooter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just like the B-52

    • @garynew9637
      @garynew9637 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mia1shooter b52 old and slow, 160 fast and modern with better stand off weapons.

    • @Jarek13
      @Jarek13 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Outlived" their usefulness.

  • @micklaws5520
    @micklaws5520 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    This aircraft is on my top ten aircraft of all time. She is just beautiful

  • @icetea8946
    @icetea8946 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    A common misconception with people is that they think once an aircraft or military hardware in general have reached a specific age its obsolete or doesnt have a place on the modern battlefield. U have to remember, when these aircrafts were being designed, they werent just designed for back then , they were designed to be upgradable for decades to come. The range of the missiles and nukes in this thing can hit targets from far away without putting in the plane in danger of SAMs and even modern fighter jets with their limited operational fuel range

    • @xxz1434
      @xxz1434 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah military stuff isn't mass produced cars for consumers

  • @suman3316
    @suman3316 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    My Brother Was the pilot For the Tu95 for Indian Navy...Now He is Operating Boeing Poseidon P8

    • @sunilsankuru9247
      @sunilsankuru9247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      India does not have a TU95 lier!

    • @Jabba.Da.Hutt_
      @Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@sunilsankuru9247 India does have the Tu-95 it’s just called the Tu-142 for there Navy, so Suman isn’t lying.

    • @antifragile3881
      @antifragile3881 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Jabba.Da.Hutt_ Aircraft retired in 2017

    • @Jabba.Da.Hutt_
      @Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@antifragile3881 oh really. That’s sad

    • @user-jj2dk5ew9j
      @user-jj2dk5ew9j 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      !!!????

  • @forfreedomandpeaceinukrain2943
    @forfreedomandpeaceinukrain2943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    It has been a regular customer for Japan since the Cold War.

    • @imitv630
      @imitv630 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Unfortunately, they have to fly there )))

  • @TheSonicfrog
    @TheSonicfrog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Old Russian saying: easy to tempt a Bear out of its cage ... much harder to tempt it to go back inside

    • @user-hp4qy9dy4v
      @user-hp4qy9dy4v 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This is the first time I've heard this saying. Hello from Russia.

    • @andrewflower9533
      @andrewflower9533 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Есть такое высказывание, только, если я не ошибаюсь, сказала это Бисмарк…

    • @joshuacorden4295
      @joshuacorden4295 ปีที่แล้ว

      HAL9000 that you

    • @TheSonicfrog
      @TheSonicfrog ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshuacorden4295 Sorry, Dave, I can't open the pod bay door for you.

    • @petegarnett7731
      @petegarnett7731 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@user-hp4qy9dy4v It's one of those old Russian sayings they invented in America.

  • @916Pashok
    @916Pashok 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Also the in 1961,Tu-95 was used to drop hydrogen bomb "Tsar Bomba" on the Novaya Zemlya Island.

  • @mikewazowski6161
    @mikewazowski6161 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    one of the most beautiful aircraft ever built...greetings from germany....

  • @supersonicdiesel4836
    @supersonicdiesel4836 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    B52 Stratofortress and TU95- amazing 1950s aircraft that still operate effectively today.

  • @Firebrand55
    @Firebrand55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    ....because it has the best turbo-prop engine ever made....The Kuznetsov N-12...no other engine of this type comes near it for reliability longevity.

    • @user-jj2dk5ew9j
      @user-jj2dk5ew9j 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      now it feed with more reliability up date turbo-prop engine

    • @hamiltoncarvalho2383
      @hamiltoncarvalho2383 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alao because of this plane s contrarotatory propõe

    • @benyomovod6904
      @benyomovod6904 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The engine was made in Ukraine

    • @qwwe1324
      @qwwe1324 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@benyomovod6904двигатель изобрели в ссср, сейчас продолжается его производство в самаре. На украине, все, как водиться, растащили😂

    • @alexandrstepanenko5854
      @alexandrstepanenko5854 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@benyomovod6904 никогда двигатель не производили на Украине. Их делали в г. Куйбышев, теперь это Самара. Учи матчасть, глупо выглядишь.

  • @fareazy3239
    @fareazy3239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Transport planes and bombers can also be time capsules in the military world☺

  • @sue08401
    @sue08401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just funny to consider the B52, the TU 95 and CH47 all came out in the 1950's (I think the first ch47's came out in 1959) And they are still in service.

    • @Delgen1951
      @Delgen1951 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      produces of the Ture Golden age of flight. True Classics.

  • @Desire123ification
    @Desire123ification 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    100 years = Great Engineering

  • @Picasso_305
    @Picasso_305 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    With that push and pull turbine engine system and swept back wings could teach 575 miles per hour for a prop driven aircraft of the 1950s was great

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very simple, just like the B-52, if it ain't broke, don't fix it!

  • @juniorballs6025
    @juniorballs6025 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Minor correction: The Avro Vulcan was taken out of service in 1984, but some examples remained airworthy and were used in shows and government things for the Royal Family etc. Sorry!

  • @borissljukic1470
    @borissljukic1470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Comparing Tu 95 and B 52 I came to the following conclusions:
    - The B 52 consumes 4.33x more fuel
    - Has 4x more expensive engine response
    That says the B 52 is 17.33x more expensive to maintain.
    - B 52 is 1.14x faster
    - B 52 has 2.12x more the payload
    - The B 52 has 1.52x longer range
    That says the B 52 has 3.66x better features than Tu 95.
    Altogether Tu 95 is 4.74x more economical in performing its tasks than B 52.

    • @OrtonHeadXIV
      @OrtonHeadXIV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Both are highly reliable, just shows how great they're and how both countries refuse to let go of these old but capable beasts.

    • @skip123davis
      @skip123davis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      boris, that is cool!

    • @borissljukic1470
      @borissljukic1470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Analyzing both planes, I came to the startling fact that for the same money, the Tu 95 can carry 2.23x more weight.

    • @borissljukic1470
      @borissljukic1470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I started the analysis with the preconception that the B 52 was a better aircraft, but the facts convinced me otherwise.

    • @TripleAce1
      @TripleAce1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Price wise B-52 likely cost 2 to 4 time more.

  • @LalisaManoban-ss2cs
    @LalisaManoban-ss2cs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Counter rotation blades ❤

  • @SilverforceX
    @SilverforceX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its still potent because of the missiles it carry which are modern cruise missiles, including the new hypersonic variants. It doesn't need to be agile or fast, because its range strike are the missiles not the platform itself. Plus, its reliable, efficient.

  • @aloh5613
    @aloh5613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    It has a secondary role...
    Annoying the British, by flying close to the UK every other month 😂😂

    • @KillerPigeon-ct6ss
      @KillerPigeon-ct6ss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Literally every other month lol!

    • @kingofcrimson4177
      @kingofcrimson4177 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      True. Bet you it’ll be here in January, especially with the current tension on the Ukrainian border to ‘keep an eye on us’

    • @haimcukerman1012
      @haimcukerman1012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And nobody knows what is onboard.
      Maby some stupid 50 megatons.

    • @joshuacorden4295
      @joshuacorden4295 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kingofcrimson4177 I hate Ukraine. From Birmingham.

  • @ferminbf2224
    @ferminbf2224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ..... because it´s true badass aircraft

  • @ronwilsontringue6574
    @ronwilsontringue6574 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where can I buy one??

  • @wallstreet497
    @wallstreet497 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If it doesn't break don't fix it.

  • @anoopharidas9261
    @anoopharidas9261 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's the name of the soundtrack in the video?

  • @mibfox
    @mibfox ปีที่แล้ว

    Oldie but goldie. Such a fine plane.

  • @adilachahbar3154
    @adilachahbar3154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tu 95 Bear voice is terrifying and beautiful

  • @IqbalKhan-eg9fc
    @IqbalKhan-eg9fc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    World most advanced and reliable biggest bomber aircraft
    Tu 95

  • @class.C
    @class.C 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    cus they dont have money to replace it

    • @pitsonamane5356
      @pitsonamane5356 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The US fear it. They will even send the F-22 Raptor to intercept it. Why send such capable fighter jet not other propeller driving fighter?? Bear is the monster of the sky....

    • @randomuser5443
      @randomuser5443 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pitsonamane5356 crazy idea, the f22s were in the area and we needed intelligence on them

    • @artemvektor1
      @artemvektor1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually all Russian operational Tu95's are much younger then American b52's

  • @petegarnett7731
    @petegarnett7731 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unique. The only bomber you can hear coming before it appears on your radar screen

    • @user-jj2dk5ew9j
      @user-jj2dk5ew9j 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      but now is carry rocket faster than you thing

    • @user-jz1ft5jp5k
      @user-jz1ft5jp5k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Нет не услышите его рев , он скинет ракеты в безопасной зоне и повернет.

  • @imrekalman9044
    @imrekalman9044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There have been attempts to make another aircraft with such an awesome soundtrack, including with contra-rotating propellers, but all failed to deliver. That's why the BEAR remains in service.

    • @simkahop8519
      @simkahop8519 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Most powerful and fast turboprops EVER! This is the title, and with those engines - just look wha URSS have done - AN - 22 Antei - cargo aircraft, with same engines, such a Beauty!😎😇🥰😍😁 - Up to 80 tonnes!😎 - in turboprops, it is WOW, anyway. 😮😎🙂

  • @alphasixfive1658
    @alphasixfive1658 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One flew over us in SE Asia in 1986 and took photos.

  • @mr.aleximer
    @mr.aleximer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it true that its propeller blade tips move faster than sound? 😳

  • @per-cq5nk
    @per-cq5nk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Tu-95MS and MSM have at least 18 years less than the B-52H. The first mass production Tu-95MS has 19 years less than the last B-52H.

  • @Jarek13
    @Jarek13 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I say the AA cannons in the back are a "Joke"

  • @Subgunman
    @Subgunman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wrong, the Avro Vulcan has been retired some years back.

  • @JungleYT
    @JungleYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    *Spinny, spinny, spinny... Tee, Tee I once read a story by an F-15 interceptor pilot who described his teeth as rattling, so powerful is the sound wave from those engines as he closed in on the thing!*

  • @MrDino1953
    @MrDino1953 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does it have a negative dihedral angle on the main wings?

    • @percival5771
      @percival5771 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      to induce instability. because its so heavy and the wings root towards teh upper half of teh fuselage cross-section that "hanging weight" makes it awfully hard to control with ailerons. therefore negative dihedral gives it that instability and thus sensitivity to roll input. mind you there is likely other reasons for this too but i imagine what i said applies to it just as much as the titanic antonov AN-225

  • @benyomovod6904
    @benyomovod6904 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No cash for new development, less sensitive to EMP, more fuel efficency

  • @billmorris2613
    @billmorris2613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good morning to all from SE Louisiana 22 Jan 22.

  • @enhancedutility266
    @enhancedutility266 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Long range, cheap, can hold missiles and bomb's why not.

  • @krisnawangsa5030
    @krisnawangsa5030 ปีที่แล้ว

    with a contra rotated propeller can Russia apply it to jet engines for next Bear ???

  • @chippy2986
    @chippy2986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is the Vulcan still in service today?

    • @frimodig
      @frimodig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      All the british V-bombers have been retired since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    • @eraserstp
      @eraserstp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@frimodig this is sad actually

    • @paulschab8152
      @paulschab8152 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, the Vulcan left RAF service in 1984. XH558 last flew in 2015.

    • @chippy2986
      @chippy2986 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This was more directed at the creator and his misinformation on the Vulcan and B52 still being in service today, I know full well the Vulcan is not in service today at all.

    • @paulschab8152
      @paulschab8152 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chippy2986 Yea, I heard him say the Vulcan was still in service and SMH.

  • @justarandomrussiasupersoni4402
    @justarandomrussiasupersoni4402 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's My Friend

  • @cujbaion1
    @cujbaion1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Because it's working - like a knife, would you buy a new fancy knife like iPhones?

  • @shepherdlusale1459
    @shepherdlusale1459 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3000 km thats awesome

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 ปีที่แล้ว

      Х-101, 102 (the same missile Х-101, only with a thermonuclear warhead, power up to 1 megaton) The maximum range is 5500 kilometers.

  • @samuelweir5985
    @samuelweir5985 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Russia's Tu-95 Bomber is No Joke"
    You wouldn't even hear the joke if you were on a Tu-95 - or even for many days after the flight ended.

  • @321bytor
    @321bytor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Vulcan is not in service now.

  • @michaeladams9641
    @michaeladams9641 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes modernized reverse engineered B29 excellent American engineering.

  • @TheGrenadier97
    @TheGrenadier97 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If it works, why worry?

  • @user-jn2gc8fk6q
    @user-jn2gc8fk6q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Regularly gets intercepted round the UK so if its war it's toast

  • @The_BIG_salad
    @The_BIG_salad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My favorite Russian plane

  • @Mahmud-ey4ee
    @Mahmud-ey4ee หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well engineered designers russian

  • @adilachahbar3154
    @adilachahbar3154 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because she can get the job done

  • @msb3235
    @msb3235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Meh, the Russian simply has no moolah to do replace it...

    • @user-fn8jo2mo2d
      @user-fn8jo2mo2d 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is not Oddworld. Go back to your post in Rupture farms or you'll be turned into a Mudokon Pop!

  • @borischilykyn4923
    @borischilykyn4923 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Tu-95MS is a cruise missile bomber born in the 70s. Its first flight is in 1979, in the city of Taganrog, into mass production from the 80s. It is basically a Navy Tu-142MK, modified for the Soviet (now Russian) Long Range Aviation. Nothing to do with a "Tu-95 Bear". The Tu-95 Bear is not in the Russian service sice early 90s..... Nothing to do also with the B-52 (the last B-52H is from 1962...), different aircraft, different purposes: the Tu-95MS is a cruise missile carrier, no bombs.

  • @rastamoose
    @rastamoose ปีที่แล้ว

    The vulcan was shut down years ago

  • @vincentwinfield4376
    @vincentwinfield4376 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Vulcan isn’t still in service 😂😂

  • @robgraham5697
    @robgraham5697 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have spotted the enemy task force. Dosvidanya Rodina!

  • @gourmetmasters910
    @gourmetmasters910 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If it aint broke dont try to fix it

  • @MrKhan-sn3ud
    @MrKhan-sn3ud ปีที่แล้ว

    Missiles fired from TU-95 has range of 3000 km????

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Х-101, 102 (the same missile Х-101, only with a thermonuclear warhead, power up to 1 megaton) The maximum range is 5500 kilometers.

  • @engchoontan8483
    @engchoontan8483 ปีที่แล้ว

    250lb bombs are not that expensive...use smaller and more should do the trick. 250lb are about the smallest.

  • @cbrito573
    @cbrito573 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brasil Soberano

  • @deebee3174
    @deebee3174 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful but old. Speaks for most of the Russian military.

  • @jesuscarrion1381
    @jesuscarrion1381 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vulcan is retired.

  • @kingofcrimson4177
    @kingofcrimson4177 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Basically the TU-95 and its variants are the Russians opposite to your (US) B-52, but without the much better payload capacity?
    The RAF retired the Vulcan years ago. Last combat usage was against Argentine Airfields in the 1982 Falkland War.

  • @buddyb4343
    @buddyb4343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of the reasons it's still in service? Perhaps because it has never gone to war. Think about it . . . In the late 60's and 70's the BUFF was flying over hostile territory with combatants doing their best to bring it down. And pretty much in every decade since, the B52 has delivered; one might argue whether for good or bad, but it was doing what it was designed to do. Now, the Bear is an interesting plane, but how many times was it really put to the test?

    • @SportZFan4L1fe
      @SportZFan4L1fe 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's been active in Syria since 2015.

  • @ikill-98
    @ikill-98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If it's not broken don't fix It

  • @j.m.5995
    @j.m.5995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ronald Reagan used to make fun of the Soviets but I guess the Soviets are getting the last laugh

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just as at first the United States laughed at the drunken Yeltsin, and now the whole world is laughing at "sleeping Joe".

  • @zvast
    @zvast 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When YT video begs to like and subscribe, I click thumb down. 👎
    It's annoying and stupid when they beg before I even see the feature.

  • @colombiaturismoyviajes
    @colombiaturismoyviajes 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congrat to russian designers, it is very danger yet

  • @THEROC972
    @THEROC972 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    B-52 3 years more older,😂😂

  • @anandhuradhakrishnan4454
    @anandhuradhakrishnan4454 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia.. 🔥🔥🔥

  • @jimallroggen314
    @jimallroggen314 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vulcan is NOT in service.

  • @kaantransporttransport3198
    @kaantransporttransport3198 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    in-dis-pensable charisma...

  • @timmcpherson9632
    @timmcpherson9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A bomber with propellers ? 🤔
    What could possibly go wrong, right !? 😀😁😂🤣

    • @VovaSidorOff
      @VovaSidorOff 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Propellers ... Why not ? It is fuel economy. Tu-95 carry supersonic long range jet missiles.

    • @imrekalman9044
      @imrekalman9044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      People have been dissing the Tu-95 and its propellers since 1952. And here it is, still working. Your argument (what little there is) is nothing new, and just as wrong.

    • @M16_Akula-III
      @M16_Akula-III 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And yet it was converted into an airliner and was and still is the fastest turboprop aircraft. Not just that, the fact that it WAS the fastest aircraft at it's time tells you a lot more.

    • @user-hp4qy9dy4v
      @user-hp4qy9dy4v 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Tu-95 is equipped with a turboprop engine and is a missile carrier. Dropping free-falling bombs from it is useless.
      A turboprop engine is quite economical compared to a turbojet engine. And it still does not enter the air defense zone thanks to the X-101

    • @user-fn8jo2mo2d
      @user-fn8jo2mo2d 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bomber with turbine engines? 🤔
      What could possibly go wrong, right?!?!??????????!??!!!!

  • @hardyanpajero69
    @hardyanpajero69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍😎🍺🍩✈️

  • @ghostrecon3214
    @ghostrecon3214 ปีที่แล้ว

    Constructive criticism? I think you put too much inflection in your narration which sounds too much like TV programs which is not a good thing in my opinion. Apparently 559k people don't mind or tolerate it so maybe it is just me but it really does deter me from watching your videos which is a shame i love aircraft.

  • @Wrathfist
    @Wrathfist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to inform you that the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, thus the "Bear" can't do anything now for the Soviet reputation.

  • @eanerickson8915
    @eanerickson8915 ปีที่แล้ว

    Using bombs is a joke.

  • @Michael_Michaels
    @Michael_Michaels 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too bad Russia doesn't have a decent human being leading the country. They have such pretty awesome machines! Quirky but awesome!

  • @utentesconosciuto7894
    @utentesconosciuto7894 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    💪🏻😎🇷🇺