Russia's New Stealth Bomber - the Invisible PAK-DA
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ม.ค. 2022
- Visit brilliant.org/foundandexplained/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
Discord: / discord
New Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
When it comes to stealth technology though, USA generally takes the cake. Everything form the original stealth f-117 Nighthawk, to the upcoming b-21 raider - all have put the country on the map - or rather off it, when it comes to clandestine missions across the world.
That however, might be about to change as Russia gears up to start flight testing its new top secret bomber project. Now fair warning before we get into it, it can be a little bit hard to discern between fact and ambitious propoganda - so until this plane is cruising in the skies, its specifications might be rather 'up in the clouds' so to speak.
PAK DA itself stands for Perspective Aviation Complex for Long-Range Aviation.
And long range it will be! With a 12,000 km operational range, it will have the ability to fly from moscow to any city in North America, Rio in Brazil and even Darwin in Australia - G'day mate!
It doesn't have to worry about refueling, as it can fly its four crew members subsonically for up to 30 hours to circle targets or to be hidden deep in the clouds until needed.
These engines are so powerful, that they can work in minus 60°C to plus 50°C and survive even effects of nuclear explosion!
With its 30 ton weapon capacity, it will be able to carry everything from conventional bombs, nuclear missiles and in the future - hypersonic weapons.
To understand where we are now, we have to go back to where it all began.
The Tupolev Tu-160.
The supersonic strategic bomber had been a stable of the russian airforce for decades, ever since it first rolled out in 1981. However, for those viewers who might not have been born in 1981 - this is a long time ago.
Warfare has changed since and new strategic bombers are more often doing the role of cruise missile carrier rather than regular bombing missions with guided or unguided bombs. Russians know this and saw how US used their bombers in the recent conflicts, and started learning from their experiences.
Main idea was to create a new bomber that will be able to match or surpass all the current characteristics of the Tu-160
with the exception of the supersonic speed which is sacrificed for stealth and maximum load capacity.
A number of Tu-160s were lost during the dissolution of the USSR, with them being stationed in Ukraine at the time,
and the Russian bomber fleet has been lacking in that segment, which led to both the need for the PAK-DA and for a modernization and renewal of the Tu-160 production line. But more on that in a bit.
In 2013, the develop was confirmed to have a subsonic flying wrong design, with emphasis on stealth technology over speed.
Kuznetsov design bureau was awarded with the contract to develop the new engines named NK-65, based on the NK-32 engines currently used by Tu-160.
By 2019, a prototype has been in the development and the Kazan aviation plant, and it’s expected to have ground testing some time in 2022 with possible first flight in 2023 or 24.
But let’s dig a bit deeper in what actually is the combat purpose and future of this aircraft, and is Russian so called Messenger, actually sending a very important message?
For the first time in their operational history, Russian bombers have had an opportunity to perform in combat. During 2015 and 2016, Tu-95, Tu-22M and Tu-160 have flown multiple missions to Syria in various roles.
Tu-160s performed attacks with new Kh-101 cruise missiles, while Tu-22Ms and Tu-95s performed sorties with both cruise missiles and bombs, testing out the new SVP-24 Hephaestus targeting system, which basically turns dumb bombs into at least semi - guided munition, similar to US JDAM, but still lacking in precision.
So what does all of this mean for PAK-DA?
First of all, focus will be on missiles as main weaponry. Hypersonic missiles like King-zhal and new Kh-92 will be featured for sure, along with the stealthy Kh-101 and 102 cruise missiles.
This all leads to the idea of Russia actually creating a capable preemptive strike aircraft which can hit anywhere in the world. With US and Russian relations getting worse in recent years, especially over Ukraine, this might be a clear sign that Russia wants to be in the same position as the US with first strike capabilities and use this to either further escalate or deescalate current situation.
Visit brilliant.org/foundandexplained/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
If that Actor of Ukraine Zelensky would have surrendered to Russia all of this would have been over a long time ago.
🇷🇺🌟🇷🇺 RUSSIA IS GREAT**GLORY TO RUSSIA**GOD GIVE RUSSIA VICTORY.
🇷🇺🌟🇷🇺
Allways, Amen 🙏
Same quality as the T-14 Armata tank that only exists as a cardboard mockup and between the ears of some Russian leaders 🤣🤣
@8:12 Displayed the correct map of India. thank you
2:20 - "It can be a little bit hard to _dis-kern_ between fact and..."
Nah, I wouldn't have bothered to check the bot narration, before uploading it to trawl for 'likes', either.
😑
I am stunned by the visual quality. It's honestly incredible how far you've come. Keep it up!
You believe everything you see?
@@akborealisdevstringerdesig3845 You did not understand the comment
cretin
Reminds me of Mustard.
@@akborealisdevstringerdesig3845 i believe
At 3:40, i saw the turbine blade through the cockpit. The fact that you even modeled an internal component like that is one of the reasons why subscribe... keep it up!!!
I don’t think you would be able to see straight through the plane irl... so I’d say it’s an error
@@thatgreenneko could you imagine
It is an internal turbo propeller engine to cool it down
Does he himself create the render or does he outsource it to someone named Andrey something
@@haberdasherrykr8886 he said in a q and a that he learnt blender to model planes since the videos he wanted to make about experimental planes would have enough footage
At this point, it is so invisible even russians cant find where it is parked.
😭😭😭
Savage😂
Ur troll wont make russia weak.Russia alone control full nato.
-Trump
say that to our Kinjal -class missiles😂
It also has MASSIVE exhausts directly from the rear, no masking, shielding or anything.
An infra red stealth stop sign.
Right?! Lol
You definitely know more than the engineers
Get rid of Putin real simple trouble with a Capitol T
Самая большая неэкранированная труба у тебя в штананах берегись черной головки с самоноведением)))
@@pjm760 You don't need to be a pilot to know that helicopters don't belong in trees.
Compare those engine outlets to a B21 or B2. Russia constantly lies about the capabilities of some future wonderweapon. I trust US engineers who have actually built stealth aircraft
Saw you In the Podcast in Creators and Founders. We (2 of Us )Started A 3d Animation Channel (Blender) inspired by your Work and Dedication.Really in Awe At your Work . All the The Best to the 1 Million Subscriber mark.
Send me an email and we can set up a call to talk about your video/youtube journey :) love to help new creators!
@@FoundAndExplained Will Definitely Do Thank You For the Reply. Means a lot : )
Xeha lijia why are you spamming this channel with your content??? Should not be on this channel.
@@FoundAndExplained I would too like to talk about the models or animation used in your videos
@@Aitelly Looked at your channel, it's very impressive.
Russia announces new weapons systems all the time. But the ratio of announced weapons to the number actually funded/developed/deployed is actually quite low.
What I can noticed all of them going into production. How many goes into production nobody knows, publicly released numbers are not true. Always expect many more.
When you can't do shit... talk shit... Russia 101
@@goranmarkovic6002 haha hood little Ruskin!
Why would Russia need to bankrupt themselves during peacetime, like their competitor?..
Russia can simply wait until they are invaded, then mobilize the whole country to war production, catching the invader by surprise.
Just like 1942, when the Germans were confronted with thousands of T34s they had no idea existed.
@@goranmarkovic6002 That is no excuse. Russians just dont have the budget to build them its as simple as that. $50 billion dollar budget is not a lot to work with. How many prototype "stealth fighters" have they announced and showed off on media in the past 20 years? They spend more money on propaganda videos of test fires (which are heavily editied) than the actual mass production. Also, yes every nation promotes its equipment the US does it as well...difference is US actually goes to war and has been in countless wars in the past 80 years after WW2. Russia has only seen combat in Syria which isnt really saying much because 30 other nations are bombing syria as well.
The period footage combined with gorgeous, gleaming CG and animation - if I'm going to learn about anything, I'll check to see if you've given it some spotlight first 👍🍻
2:21 did you just say “dis-Kern” when you were trying to say discern? 😂
Amazing graphic work, mate! Congrats and thanks for sharing!
If they can afford it, then Russian Airforce would have a really Dangerous weapon...as their hypersonic missiles would make it extremely dangerous.......maybe more than or equal to the B 21, but they need to find a stable way to afford it......
ℂ𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE
Megan: "Hotter"
Hopi: "Sweeter"
Joonie: "Cooler"
Yoongi: "Butter
Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy .
Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım''
Erinder: ''Sezimdüü''
Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak''
Dene: ''Muzdak''
Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis.
Aç köz arstan
Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon.
Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan.
Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾
Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente
💗❤️💌💘💟
Hey, here's an idea... Let's install a declining geriatric who will decimate his own country's energy independence and beg Russia for oil that they can then sell at inflated prices. 🙄
Nah, bad idea.
@@commerce-usa That geriatric got voted out of office in November 2020. He's now happily doing lines and scamming money from his sheep in Florida. Happy to clear things up for you.
@@commerce-usa, self sustained energy dependence for the first time in years. Meh, what for, let's give that to Russia and just buy oil from them. Fukn stupidest thing ever. What's even scarier is that some idiots still think our country is doing great.
@@commerce-usa the Russians did that in 2016
Now it looks like Putin is having early onset Alzheimer's
Way to go Nick. Only you can pull off a cheeky g’day! 🤣
Excellent video well done
Great info.👍.
God bless everyone.🙏.
Wow..Russia also entered in stealth bomber race.. it will be very interesting to see how Russia will manage it.. because this race is very costly..
Ya,i mean they have even buit a stealth bomber drone ...So,the significance of stealth bombers will increase in future wars...
They will probably keep a small fleet in key locations. It is an expensive toy.
stealth bombers are extremely expensive, it cost $50 BILLION just to create the B2 and it costs millions of dollars to maintain them even when they aren't flying. Russia will most definitely not keep a large fleet of bombers
edited for more accurate values
@@dalelumina3 Indeed, Russia has Su-34 as a bomber (though it is a universal machine) and other planes. This new stealth bomber will not be made in crazy quantities, it has a limited mostly strategic role.
@@dalelumina3 That’s partly because the US ordered so few of them, so the cost per unit exploded. The B 21 raider is *significantly* less expensive than that to both purchase and maintain. But the raider is cheaper in large part because of lessons learned from earlier stealth platforms that have brought down cost with time, whereas this is Russia’s first foray into the space so… Who knows.
It's weird how Russia has gone from "Stealth is useless" to "Here's our new stealth fighter."
Nothing weird here. US stealth tech was indeed quite useless against Russian Army radars and their crews (not some export versions operated by God knows who). So Russia implemented different approach making planes with stealthiness being not a key future, but a way to reduce radar signature as much as possible without harming too much other parameters, which cant be said about F-117, F-35 and B-2. The exception here is S-70, but its a drone, so different story.
About PAK-DA there is so few information, than its not even worth to speculate for now. It can continue in such a state for next 20 years. while Russia producing TU-160M2, or its work could be rushed in recent years following completely different design than shown in video.
@@user-qu9wk7ru7e still remember when a nighthawk actually got detected by a 1950s soviet radar in Yugoslavia? Yeah USA at the time is hilarious
Stealth is expensive Russian military budget small so no good stealth means no stealth.
@@Radialguy Russian military budget is adequate to its tasks. Its US military budget is overblown by lobbysts so much that everything cost insane summ of money and more of it you have to pay even more for its maintanance.
@@user-qu9wk7ru7e Sounds like pure propaganda.
The Checkmate. The Messenger. The White Swan. ...
This guys know how name their flying machines for sure, better than everyone else.
Shame they can’t build them eh?
@@jb76489 Suxoy and Mig are better than any American jet. F-35 Strike Fighter Continues to Be a Massive Waste of Taxpayer Money. A piece of crap. We know who is a real shame. LOL
Wow! This is truly the successor of the Horten 18
That's more of the "blended wing-body" type of aircraft than a flying wing.
Damn the animations keep getting better and better. Keep it up Nik
ℂ𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE
Megan: "Hotter"
Hopi: "Sweeter"
Joonie: "Cooler"
Yoongi: "Butter
Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy .
Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım''
Erinder: ''Sezimdüü''
Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak''
Dene: ''Muzdak''
Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis.
Aç köz arstan
Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon.
Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan.
Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾
Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente
💗❤️💌💘💟
So, their military can't even supply their troops with the proper equipment and even proper MREs and you're telling me that they have the funds to develop this type of aircraft?
And they can't even mass-produced their T-90, T-14 Armata & Su-57. 🤣
i was accually reading a book called "dale brown Artic storm rising" and it has this exact plane in it lol
Nice touch with the hull name. Russia tends to name large airframes (civilian ones after cultural icons, military ones after heroes). This one is named after Nikolai Gulayev, one of the aces in the Battle of Kursk: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Gulayev .
this comment aged well
@@jimwhite967 do elaborate.
🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩❤️🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
China can reach further then you said with their missiles but still sucks compared to our bomber. Plus Russia couldn’t even make/finish their new tank… they definitely not making a stealth bomber lol china took a crashed stealth bomber for study and had spies steal blueprints for the bombers and it still isn’t close to our bomber.
@@dalentalashe didnt 😂
Interestingly, the PAK DA has already entered the world of fiction - I was reading "Arctic Storm Rising" by Dale Brown, which involves a prototype being stolen by a rouge Russian guy and flying it to remote Alaska for ransom, where the American guys hunt it down.
That book deliberately left the small features of the bomber ambiguous in a way that when the actual bomber comes out, it will fit right in. It's a really good read.
Sounds like the plot behind "Firefox" to me.
@@MarvelousSeven I was thinking the same.
Inverse of Day of the Cheetah by the sounds of it
I guess so. It's been a few decades. Well, more like a brand new "Flight of the Old Dog" that started something new in the upcoming releases.
Dale Brown's 'Night of the Hawk' also features a stealth bomber, a Belarussian one, built in Lithuania with the help of a brainwashed 'Old Dog' crew member, Dave Luger. One of his best.
The books Dale Brown published before 2000 were all pretty solid in plausible near-future tech, the plots and the writing were (still) quite good. His dialogues were never masterpieces, but sufficient in techno-thrillers.
After 'Battle Born', imo, the quality crashed from just a 'still enjoyable' into 'annoyingly cringeworthy recycled waste of time'.
To his defense, Brown recycled mainly his own original plot ideas. And it is hard to connect a futuristic strategic strike force to a post 9/11 real-world, dominated by headlines about the war on terror and on low-tech insurgents, in which air strikes usually aren't solving the big problems. Which is the Dale Brown trope: problems caused by bad guys to US, difficult high tech air strike solves the problems (despite US leadership having forbidden the strike).
Also, a noticeable read is his 'Storming Heaven' from 1994, in which a terrorist mastermind has passenger planes crashing into airports, threatening to do the same to industrial, military and political objects. It also contains, quite prophetically, the inception of something like Homeland Security. In Brown's fiction that solved the terrorist problem. In the real-world however, it was just part of a new chapter in the conflict.
The Russian bomber is so stealthy it was never seen or detected in Ukraine.
Because it's just as new as the B-21, and that B-21 hasn't been seen in Syria yet. Same exact logic
@@Arkasha-Zdifference being that there are already 6 B-21 Raiders in active development and it’s first flight to take place later this year. Russia has yet to show anything.
@@legendary4570 And who's to say that the PAK-DA isn't also in active development? You can? Well then, thank you for your service I guess, you must be some super ultra CIA intelligence operator to be able to penetrate the security of the military industrial complex of another country and then share your findings in a TH-cam comment.
@@Arkasha-Z you really don’t think Russia would be flexing its stealth capabilities if it could do so? China showed off its J-20 and capabilities, it showed its working on 6th gen stealth fighters hell even North Korea showed off new ICBM tech lol! Yet you’re telling me Russia can’t show anything?
@@legendary4570 Here, let me introduce you to a new word,
Classified
clas·si·fied - /ˈklasəˌfīd/
adjective:
(of information or documents) designated as officially secret and to which only authorized people may have access.
A linguistic correction: at 2:21 in "discern" c is prounounced as s, not as k
Excellent video. Love the design of it.
I'm nervous that the real thing won't look as good.
Russia's strategy does not presuppose a preemptive strike or an attack on Nuclear states. In this regard, we do not need stealth very much. Of course, it is good if the plane is visible from a shorter distance, but in general it is not critical. There is no real stealth aircraft in our world. It all depends on the radar and the range. But what we really need is that the aircraft in full combat load could fly 11 time zones without refueling. At the same time, it should have a good speed (more than that of the tu160) and load capacity, as well as a mode of operation from -50 to +50. In addition, our strategists assume that such an aircraft will be used on duty, which means that in addition to high speed, it should also have a very economical speed that keeps it in the air as long as possible. So, I am sure, the New bomber will not have Stealth but low visibility for radars, but it will have a wide range of speeds and perhaps the high-altitude ceiling will be space (60+ km). I think so
Great comment, Яков Фоминых, most civilians don't realize that different countries have different requirements based on many different factors, including, but not limited to, their geography, their strategy, their environment, and their production ability. They think if aircraft A doesn't have similar performance characteristics to aircraft B, then the country that produced aircraft A got it wrong. This isn't true, they just had a different set of requirements.
Земляк дело говорит
Good explanation
"Russia's strategy does not presuppose a preemptive strike or an attack on Nuclear state" this has dated and looks quite ridiculous. Russia liberally threatens nuclear war even against small states as small as Estonia as part of its oppressive and arrogant 'zone of influence' imperialism policies. All of Russia's attacks have begun Treacherously whether it was using the Naval Base at Sevastopol that Ukraine had leased to Russia or the Febuary 24th 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
-Russia's policies have always involved denial and sneak attacks. Stealth is just a technology Russia hasn't mastered yet.
-Being able to fly 11 time zones at speed is not important. 11 times zones is enough in reality such a large bomber wouldn't fly missions from the border. It would get destroyed by missiles if within 1 time zone of a border.
aircraft like the b2 and b21 are true stealth aircraft and not low observability as they are almost invisible to low frequency search radars and high frequency track radars.
0:28 holy SMOKES look at that IR signature !
Nice Info
You really can see how good the quality has been improved ^^
ℂ𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE
Megan: "Hotter"
Hopi: "Sweeter"
Joonie: "Cooler"
Yoongi: "Butter
Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy .
Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım''
Erinder: ''Sezimdüü''
Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak''
Dene: ''Muzdak''
Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis.
Aç köz arstan
Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon.
Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan.
Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾
Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente
💗❤️💌💘💟
11:23 could qualify for hybrid wing body.
ℂ𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE
Megan: "Hotter"
Hopi: "Sweeter"
Joonie: "Cooler"
Yoongi: "Butter
Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy .
Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım''
Erinder: ''Sezimdüü''
Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak''
Dene: ''Muzdak''
Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis.
Aç köz arstan
Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon.
Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan.
Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾
Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente
💗❤️💌💘💟
If it enters production, I'll be amazed.
Very nice 3D demonstration
I would be more convinced of the design, if the engine intakes were on the dorsal surface of the plane to keep them from being seen by radar on the ground or lower angles.
Nobody cares if your convinced.
PAK-FA has some peculiar design choices as well that reduce its stealth profile, like the forward canards and I think the sensor bubble.
@@iprofox3758
Wow. You really have no life do you?
@@foabmoab
I have no idea what is going on in Russia to literally walk up to the line of "getting it right" to just flub it like that.
@@DocWolph Think I've seen it previously mentioned before that because its one of their first forays into a stealth design, they hadn't perfect it. Although given the decades of research and other successful designs, its still a bit curious.
It has long been my understanding that the PAK-DA was a Sukhoi project, not that the distinction matters as much these days with the design bureaus being consolidated now... An interesting video nonetheless. Cheers!
Very nice AirCraft. WoW
You are gonna beat MUSTARD my friend.
Nope you can make a movie with this insane video quality.
The range maps you're showing are just a bit misleading because the earth is laid out flat... instead of like a sphere, as it normally would be.
If the russians were to ever launch an attack on the US, they would probably fly over the north pole and through Canada, which is a much shorter route distance wise, and is probably the reason why the engines are rated to go in such cold temperatures. This has been the case since roughly the 1950's when ICBM's became a thing, where both countries realized the shortest route was over the north pole, not to fly over europe and across the atlantic ocean.
Would be great if you could take more time to consider that in future videos.
Came here for the same comment. It's less than 10,000 km from Moscow to San Diego via direct polar route. Equally importantly bombers don't take off from Red Square, they could take off anywhere within Russian Borders, so the effective range is 12,000 km from the russian border. 9,000 km from Sochi to Cape town, 10,000 km from Vladisvostok to New Zealand. 12,000 km from Western Russia to Argentina. Basically everywhere in the world except the southern 1/3 of South America and Antarctica. Also,...12,000km one way nuclear strike vs 6,000km return flight ? Mid air refueling ? It appears I've gone full on pedantic over a map I suppose.
@@davidzhabin only a child doesn’t understand escalation
@@LoadOShite lmao
@@moggrick7084 Hes right any war would escalate to nukes very fast.
@@LoadOShite bait
I always wondered about the Russian military and Air Force
With the reveal and development of the S-70 stealth drone, why not make it an unmanned stealth bomber that could carry laser guided bombs, Air to surface missiles and whatever arsenal that can fit in there as a cheaper and quick alternative?
In addition to the usual functions of the s70 combat drone, it is already seen as strengthening aviation by placing long-range air-to-air missiles on board and escorting or commanding a su57 group. In general, an increase in ammunition! While all the options I think are being developed and I hope we will never see a real application!
I dont think thay can just jet but sanctions are making problems now very big problems
@@nedimharacic1809 what I'm going to say now is only my opinion so don't take it like it's 100% true. If the sanctions don't get lifted from Russia, this might encourage them to try to make their own stuff, and slowly but surely in a few years, they might have a small.... let's say microchip industry, and that would be the best for Russia. But I think this might take a long time.
😂 omg! You're kid ?????
@@georgeantabi6025 maybe......idk
This one is parked right next to the Su-75 checkmate.
cant kill what doesnt exist
Just a tip, for your future forays... what you need is an ellipsoid shape that both allows the choking of mass and the broad expansion of exhaust gasses... circles were nice fifty years ago... what also helps is if you have inductive cooling to reduce the heat of those expanded gases quickly after the point of ejection so as not to create a massive plume... I mean, if we take at face value the kind of fuels that Russia uses to avoid frosting... that's a tall order... because usually, that exhaust is going to be fuel rich...
Beautiful glowing exhaust.
Well I have to give it to them, that’s a very good looking aircraft.
"Flying prototype in 22-23", those would probably arrive right after Iran drones and KNDR commandos )
I always love rewatching couple years old videos about hyped superweapons that turned out to be useless moneysinks.
Nick I wanted to know if you have heard about a new aerospace startup company called Radian Aerospace? They are in the process of developing a single stage to orbit space plane called the Radian one which is very similar to the Rockwell International Star Raker and I’d love to hear your thoughts on what you think of this 21st century Star Raker. Has anyone else heard about this?
hmm interesting, to add to this acherer aviation is making a new aircraft that suposedly going to used like a car mass produced and electric thanks for you time very interesting topic keep watching to skies eh?
SSTO's are unlikely.
@@georgethompson1460 unlikely but would totally be epic to see in person.
Having engine inlets below the wing and un shielded exhausts isn't going to help with stealth. Neither are the wing tip winglets.
Apperently you haven‘t watched the entire Video before writing a comment?
Video clearly states sacrifices were made regarding stealth for speed
@@markmitchell450 they haven't developed a decent fighter jet yet with a decent engine that's supposed to be stealth.
@@jerrybond1757 They made a stealth plane with a jet engine with air intakes and outtakes optimized for stealth capabilities, I guess it doesn't count since it's a drone
But they are definitely capable of doing that on a fighter jet, just give them time
@@jerrybond1757 5th Gen aircraft don't even have a definition. The only thing it needs is: Stealth (Don't care how much, as long as it's smaller than the aircraft itself), can carry multiple types of weapons, has a very good sensor fusion, and a good balance for speed and maneuverability.
Is Garmin GPS equipped standard or sold separately?
Beautiful plane and thank you for depicting your video with clear visual clarity……. 👍🇷🇺🇬🇧🕊
Btw for those who don't know, it's a lifting body design. I know that Found & Explained said it wasn't a flying wing at the end of the video, but they didn't specify what type of airframe it was. so I decided to clear the air of any confusion that might be here. Also I love the look of the 3D mock-up, it looks like something from Naboo.
5:42
With computer graphics any airframe will fly 😃
I think it looks great. With the B2 being so unique this will be looked at like a knockoff version of the B2 but I mean it’s just a good shape for the main purpose of the aircraft
Callate a llorar a otro laso
It nowhere resembles b2 in anyway you stupid morons.
If it is anything like the TU144 Concordeski, all it would need is a sparrow to fly past and it will break up in mid flight
Almost all commercial and military planes can operate between -60°C (at altitude) and +50°C (sitting on the tarmac)
They should make it a UAV, with an even larger body, and give it the capability to launch and deploy swarms of smaller drones.
And call it the arsenal bird ?
It does not matter: short of nuclear war, Russia is finished as a world bully. Their air force will be erased in hours, if they start.
They should just shut up and stop propaganda.
They got horrible army and air force.
Truly invisible since it doesn't exist.
How do you know what exists or not. The USA Air Force/ space force has probably had an SSTO now for the lest 40 years. But as far as we know it doesn’t exist
His alien masters told him as much via mind probe lol. In reality this is Russia, not the USA. They announce everything as soon as they've got a cardboard mockup. See latests Sukhoi Su-75 for example.
@@billjones7223 I
Hope you have come back 10
Months later and realized that Russia never had this bomber. They would have used it in Ukraine .
Probably just another project that was cancelled because of a lack of funding or something. That doesn’t mean I don’t like the video tho
Imagine being a Ukrainian supporter getting jealous
*The Guardian of The Arctic* ❄️Tupolev PAK DA an amazing stealth vehicle!!
That doesn’t exists and never will
@@CrayonEater255 But the word never will never will.
When all two of them are ready to go the world will tremble
A saída dos motores fica a mostra somente acima na fuselagem. Um Bombardeiro voa no teto de 28 mil ou mais, logo, as parte laterais e inferior da saída dos motores estão visivelmente inseridas internamente na fuselagem e os radares de solo não o captarão. Apenas outros aviões operando no teto poderão o captar por IR
Flying a combat mission and being allowed to fly around is two completely different things.
RUSSIANS DOESN'T NEED TO WAIT FOR ORDERS , COMRADE
@@F.O.U.N.D.E.Rwe have Primary resources for the aircraft industry and a strong industrial and knowledge base
@@checkmate7745 and your F-35 was lost with all that, cope
The question with russian modern aviation is always: can they produce it? with basicly all off its modern fighterproduction stalling
У нас есть Ту-160М, пока не превзойденный по скорости, к тому же обладающий малозаметность и способный наносить ядерные удары не заходя в зону ПВО противника. ПАК-ДА это далёкая перспектива, облик его никому не известен, кроме тех, кто участвует в разработке.
🤣🤣🤣 ти серйозно? Це гівно зробили щоб бабло з бюджету смоктать і такі як ти лохи ,, ощущали величие,, , його прототип , В1В і менше , і економічніше і технологічніше , а бойове навантаження більше, він здатен виконувати у рази більший спектр завдань
У вас есть лапти и кокошник, все остальное далёкая перспектива телевизора)
@@Qua_offСмотрите, чтобы эта перспектива что-нибудь не скинула в ваш свинарник
seems that putin might have to delay the introduction within another 6 years forward lol
Good graphics and virtual simulation.
We should add this to the Future Ace Combat Game..
3:00 "any city in America" next graphic shows the range getting just past Texas🤣😂🤣
imagine making a circle of 12k km but missing Alaska completely, when its just a short hop from the extreme east of the Russian landmass....
A note on stealth. Stealth is not a binary on or off thing. You can have certain unhealthy features in an aircraft for various of reasons, but overall the plane can be designed for stealth in mind. So while I agree that the exposed engine nozzle like that makes a plane generally less stealthy, it is not a like this sort of compromise is unheard of. The F-35 and The SU-57 both have more exposed nozzle. Yet both are clearly made for stealth. But both have made more compromises to their stealth than the F-22 in comparison.
There are more elements one could argue would make the plane less stealthy to as show in the video. You likely get better stealth by having the engine inlets on top. Having a smoother profile wing would likely help to. Not having winglets would help a tiny bit. But they're pretty angled and this mitigates it. But it is still the case that no winglets would make it more stealthy. But it is all down to compromises. No winglets mean slightly less stable flight and less efficient. Meaning you likely get less range. And stability is greatly effected, then the ailerons have to work more, and then you need to take even more care to make sure they do not show up on radar and so on.
Note, this is only base on what these general features tend to do. And if you really want to know how a plane will preform, you need to model it. Preferably a full flying prototype. But at least make a proper computer model (And in the past they did this all on paper by hand.) Clever design can sometime turn what looks to be a con in to a pro even reversing effects. I note these things more to make it clear to people that it is not one element of a plane that makes it stealthy or non-stealthy. It is the whole package and it a matter of degrees of stealth. And some elements that are very important you can not even see based on the shape of the plane. Like what paint it used or what material internal components are made off. And these aspects can sometimes matter more than the external look of the plane.
EDIT: Just trying to correct some spelling and sentence structure. Got Dyslexia.
Agree, there's more to stealth than where stuff may be protruding and how things are shaped. Anyway, as usual with this kind of videos just 95% speculation...
Agree, this is often not understood. Essentially "stealthiness" is part of a triangular trade off between stealth, speed/manuverability and payload - though in this case, I suspect the exposed engine component is more to do with development time. The engines are a not a clean sheet design that could optimised for stealth from the ground up. Russian design beureaus have been suffering from a brain drain for years, as older engineers retire and there has been a lack of new intake getting a chance to benefit from knowledge and skills transfer. This has made development of clean sheet designs incredibly protracted and dogged by problems. Building a clean sheet aircraft *and* a clean sheet engine is begging for development hell, so they fell back on the same technique as the SU-57... build a new aircraft with stealth characteristics around an existing engine, with the expectation that it can be re-engined later should a better unit become available. Indeed, the PAK-DA and SU-57 are probably waiting on the same engine family.
@@lmlmd2714 There also benefits for having them on the bottom. Makes servicing the engines easier. It is all about trade-offs.
Of course, we do not know if the plane will have them at the bottom. That is just speculation. And you can with clever design have they have less impact too. After all, there are more than a few stealth crafts that do have their intakes at the bottom or sides rather than on top where they're more shielded from ground radar.
Of course, I just mention it to illustrate the nature of trade-offs. But It seems we all are in agreement when it comes to that. Which makes me very happy since I have seen a lot of armchair designers say this or that is not stealthy because some single feature that is not ideal when it really is about the whole package. Often with a heavy doze of nationalist pride, trying to claim their country possess the only true stealth craft.
Ah edit trolling confirmed. While a real man stands for his words? You prove yourself not to be any man.
An aircraft that cannot be seen by radar? Does not exist because it cannot exist. The laws of pyhsics are clear on that.
So why scream about some delusional fantasy from videogames and movies?
@@MrFlatage Are you responding to me? If so, I did point out that the edits I made were simply fixing grammatical errors and spelling.
And what are you going on about? We have not talked about an aircraft being invisible to radar. Quite the opposite, we talk about it not being an on or off thing and that it is all about trade-offs.
Or maybe you were agreeing with us. I am not sure.
The only problem was when they decided each one should have a general on board...
3:35 "in the future : hypersonic weapons" We are in the future and khinzal hypersonic is being used now lol
it is truely only exist in TH-cam 🤣
just like US hypersonic CGI missiles 😂
I'll believe it when i actually see one
Given what we have recently seen, they likely would have built one or two of them. And it may just never get finished now with all the sanctions.
This is where TH-cam needs a laugh reaction.
This video is more real than the plane itself.
"in the future?" Russia already have operating hypersonic missiles...
Your content is just crazy quality though Im a fan!
No they don't lol it's nothing more then propaganda lies 🤣
Us 'Mericans say "eff one seventeen" for the F-117. When saying the numeric designation, we never say the number as a number. It's either "one seventeen" or sometimes "one one seven". I don't know why this is, but it's consistent across all fighters, bombers, and other aircraft.
EDIT: Also, when saying the designations of Soviet (and now Russian) aircraft, MiG is "mig", SU is "ess you", TU is "tee you", Yak is "yack", etc. I think that we tend to say the acronym as a word if it's more than two letters long. And yes, I'm probably getting pedantic, but I'm over 40 so I need to practice more for when I'm older.
Yeah- same when we're talking about missiles and stuff. I notice the Brits will say "A-I-M One hundred twenty" rather than "aim one twenty". Also, I think a big reason we say "tee you" is because otherwise it sounds like "Two"
Well, you just spell it, I mean you spell most of the things.. And I prefer the American "Ef one seventeen" than having to go through "ef one hundred seventeen" I mean, if that's the Brittish way, it's kinda stupid, idk, don't like it. I'm from Serbia, btw and we say "SU like "su" , and everything like that, actually, when I was a kid, one morning, knowing that how much I love planes, dad took me for an one hour drive to see the downed eF one seventeen and I took tore a piece of it.. it's coating is kinda like 0.5 cm of some hard rubber (I mean, that's what it feels like..) Btw, don't think that we all hate 'Mericans.. got a lot of friends from the US who stumbled upon this city and somehow, they stayed, fell in love, got jobs and stuff.. can't leave now cos' they love it .. friends etc... Some of the guys from places like LA say that it's cos it's the most chill place in the world and after hearing what's happening on the streets there, all the crime and shit.. damn .. Had a Russian and American friend talking one time and this russan friend, Pavel was like : "....and I dot stabbed once while in Moscow...." and my friend Juan was like "shit, son... you only got stabbed once?" that cracked me up.. I know that probably most people don't go through that kind of stuff but LA, selling weed and stuff on the streets, doing time for that...
Sorry "Dogg" but Russians say Soo for SU and Too TU and so on. We Americans/Mexicans a wrong and lazy frankly. You've got it backwards. For years I have listened to Russians pronounce the names of their own aircraft. The first part of the names comes from the companies that made the aircraft. The commentator is correct. Except for when ge said "discern". That was strange.
@@bujoun76 Really?! I just realized I've never listened to a Russia talking about their own aircraft. Thanks for the info!
@@bujoun76 first part of family name, yet you completely correct, same thing for Mi(Mikoyan) and KA(Kamov) we never pronounce those as two capital characters, instead - in a single word
I'm gonna guess they build one or two, fly it around during May Day parades, and keep them in hangars because they're too expensive to utilize.
Nice design from Tupolev 👍😎
Having looked at this and the recent sanctions and revelations that Russia had to import Modern chips and motherboards, I’m gonna say this aircraft is going to be delayed bumpy quite a lot.
Those hot engines [if these pictures are accurate] provide easy targets for SHASM Technology!.
They can’t even manufacture their usual tanks without western chips. Their largest tank manufacturer, Uralvagonzavod, has halted production.
@@ville-veikkomakela6506 they'll get them from China no doubt. China love sponsoring depraved war crime riddled armies and madmen, such as Putin and Kim Jung Un.
@@ville-veikkomakela6506 western chips? The most advanced US fighter gets its chip from Taiwan!
@@ville-veikkomakela6506 херню не неси что что но военная техника из отечественных компонентов создается а вот если Китай заберет Тайвань то тогда сша с маленькой буквы обосрутся по полной
Any one remember the T-14 Armada?
First serial models on state tests now. Before to launch full scale serial production.
Do you think it is long process? Okey. Let’s remember.
First prototype of T-80 arrived in 1969, serial production launched in 1976 - 7 years later. But T-80 even not created from scratch and it was not so complicated.
Another example, Germany and France several years agp promised to create own similar to T-14 tank and it will arrive in… 2035. They create it together because it is too complicated for each country alone.
New tank, from scratch, first in own generation - it is not so fast as you can think. Russia built first prototype in 2015. In 2021 tank passed all state tests and accepted to army. In 2022 factory produced first tanks with serial technology. Now they again pass tests to confirm capabilities of factory and then serial production. So?
And what about three new Russian class of nuclear strategic submarines, new ICBMs and SLBMs from scratch, S-400, S-500, Su-35 and Su-57, and so on, a lot of other weapons?)
With those engines it would have an enormous ir signature.
The Messenger, quite a name actually
The best bomber by the best mathematicians and Engineers - from Russia.
I agree - second only to Israel, with the US a distant 3rd, soon to be caught up by China.
I hope this plane is as good as the rest of the Russian military!
I see what you did there...lol
We don't kill civilians we can't use out new high technology weapons fighting a no country like Ukraine just get that in your head
lol
3:23 i hope so a normal planes engines should be able to do that to because it can reach -60 up there
I don’t think she will have revenge thrust…but push back aren’t unheard of.
Are we sure it's Russian and not Klingon? Could be a false flag; just sayin !
If this is indeed what the PAK-DA design will look like, it should still be trackable by most naval radars... vertical surfaces, thick wings, exposed nacelles with large heat signatures. this thing will maybe match the SR-71 for RCS while not being able to fly nearly as high or fast. They clearly don't trust their tech enough to make any real attempt at a stealth bomber
i don't think anyone knows how the actual PAK-DA looks like, everything is just concept arts and animations, it should look like the B2 anyway the Russians can't run from physics as that is the optimal shape for low radar bomber design.
@@OrtonHeadXIV Fun fact: The B-21 design is pretty much what the Northrop design team had in mind for the B-2 originally. They got it so right in the 70s and 80s they had to nerf it to make it fair! :P
@@mikeburner7406 Well they've certainly found other ways to do that recently...
If you are not yet aware of Russian missile technology, I advise you to familiarize yourself with the specifications of hypersonic and cruise missiles, this aircraft will not even have to leave Russian airspace to strike. And stealth for the most part will be beneficial so that the aircraft is not detected, for example, AWACS with the specifics of the signal has long been familiar to Russian intelligence. It's just that some hypersonic missiles of the KINKHAL type need an air launch.
@@DownWizzer "So you've built this aircraft, yeah?"
"Yeah."
"And it doesn't need to leave Russian airspace to fire these fancy missiles yeah?"
"Yeah!"
"So what's the point?"
"Our missiles need Viagra to shoot properly."
I think Vlad decided he needed another castle instead
Those things look like the MQ-99s and the MQ-101s
This was beautifully animated. Let know if they ever get it into production. I won't hold my breath.
It's only invisible because it does not exist.
WTF, you don’t trust Russians?
They'll never be able to build this thing. Just replacing what they've lost in Ukraine will bankrupt Russia.
After recent events I find myself significantly less worried about Russian military innovation, tactics, and air power.
Our own internal corruption, Chinese multipronged strategic warfare, and transhumanist globalism are our greatest enemies, in that order, IMO. Russia ranks somewhere after that. But they still have a very dangerous nuclear arsenal and a hunger for conquest and oppression.
you are not less worried, you are a lot more worried--the Russians have the best electronic and defensive systems in the world--where does America measure in that capacity?
You see this is the biggest mistake a military man can do I mean to underestimate your opponent. Russia has not even used 20 percent of its military might in Ukraine and you wanna judge it by these statistics 😂😂😂😂 keep underestimating your enemy and you would die and not even know you are dead
@@randyeduo laughing my fucking arse off.
@@randyeduo Yes, imagine 2 farmer's tractors pulling it because a 'Russian best electronic' 😂😂😂
"Red stars on it's wings" is soooo 40 years ago.
Stars arrived at late years of Russian Empire.
7:20 Is that for real? The MOST GORGEOUS looking plane ever created.
Yes it is Very real
Russian tu 160 bomber
It is basically a copy of American b 1b Lancer
There are many such bombers
@@TimZi-wh2ty When was American b 1b Lancer inducted or actually flew for the first time - 2021 or 2024?
@@TimZi-wh2ty😂 копия насмешил из чего зделаны самолёты б1 алюминий ту 160 титан сколько скорость на форсаже б1 1000 км ту 160 2500 такими ваши выводами можно сказать что все самолёты скопированы у братьев Райт, в основу ту 160 легли рароботки по т 100 ОКБ Сухого т ту 22 и проробатывались разные концепции в том числе летающие крыло! Наверно америкосы в2 спирит скопировали у Туполева?!
Russia using stealth tech? This is gonna be interesting...
Aint interesting anymore if you die from it...
@@Walter_Stroud ill take that as a compliment
This hits different after Russia declared war.
That's a pretty big weapon tree🌲
Amazing 👍👍👍
Any Russian aircraft can be invisible, just give their pilot enough Vodka. 🛬
If the PAK DA is designed as shown, then it would only be stealthy from a frontal aspect, but not from the rear, the engines would be easily detectable. It is the same with their fighters.
The F-35 is very detectable from rear
@@harrisn3693 No its not its rear signature in comparison to Russian Fighters is night and day they do not modify there Rear Engins The F-35 is designed to still keep a smaller Radar signature
@@harrisn3693 Compared to Russian aircraft, no
Your range charts are way off. You forgot we don't live on a flat disc. Next time use something like Gcmap to create range charts ... unless you are a flat earther, of course.
If it comes out like this it's going to the most gorgeous plane ever
Trust me Russia doesn’t have the funds for this 😂
@@Busterbucker204trust you? Sure kid 😂