G3X Unbox, Setup, & Demo - Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ค. 2024
  • Check it out HERE - realsimgear.com/products/real...
    www.flightsimpro.com/ - Our Educational Online Course
    My Desk/Gear Setup: kit.co/FlightSimPro/my-office
    00:00 Introduction - MSFS Only
    00:28 Optional Accessories
    02:03 Unboxing
    03:33 PC Setup Introduction
    04:19 Step 1: Physical Connections
    04:41 Step 2: Windows Settings
    06:33 Step 3: Map Touchscreen
    07:35 Step 4: Device Interface
    09:55 Command Map File Placement
    11:17 Step 5: Download Pop Out Manager
    15:10 Removing Black & White Bars
    16:40 Step 6: Test / Demo
    18:50 Flight Sim Pro / Conclusion

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @Bugkiller666
    @Bugkiller666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't have "Tablet PC Settings" on my control panel???

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In order for that setting to be there you'll need a touch screen connected via USB to your PC. We have just started shipping these with so I'm not sure what you're connecting just yet, but once the G3X is connected that setting will populate :)

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If 'Tablet PC Settings' is still not populating once you receive the G3X and plug it in, go to this article. It's about the 3rd or 4th step down. help.realsimgear.com/en/articles/6461067-realsimgear-touch-screen-setup

  • @thatguy7085
    @thatguy7085 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I still have the first edition of the G1000 setup. Still works great after many years

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome! Thanks for the support guy :)

  • @Aviator04
    @Aviator04 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    great stuff!

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you!! :) We're stoked to finally get this out there

  • @Dennis47403
    @Dennis47403 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'd love to see the surround/bezel decoupled from the displays. Many different sets have a 16:9 display at the core.. or close to it G1000, G3000, or G5000. It would be awesome to be able to pair the display with different button surrounds based on what you want. Some are really into a single aircraft, I love flexibility.

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not a bad idea, Dennis! I'll take it up with the devs!

  • @g-locmedia
    @g-locmedia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The touch screen looks really responsive. Nice job on the G3X

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah I'm pretty stoked with how it turned out! Thanks, man!

  • @eurosam2
    @eurosam2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can this be used with any G3000 equipped aircraft in MSFS? I have 7 inch touch screens to control them now on my G1000 suite from RSG or is the GDU1500 non touch panel better with my 7 inch touch screens. I use the popout manager currently .

  • @jetraid
    @jetraid หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome product, how about X-plane? Are you developing the plugin? Other company?

  • @benderandownz
    @benderandownz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a software version of this that works with Air Manager? I have some touch screens and I really don't want to spend $1,200 on another device right now. I would love to be able to use this with any plane as a pop out.

  • @AVIANCASAMACES
    @AVIANCASAMACES 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All Cessnas 172 at my school have this panel , it would be great to be able to use it in msfs in a C-172 too .and practice at home like in the real plane I fly

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's certainly the goal, but right now the software just hasn't been written. One day!

    • @AVIANCASAMACES
      @AVIANCASAMACES 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RealSimGear what airplanes can this be used with ?

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Default MSFS G3X Aircraft:
      Cubcrafters XCub: Tailwheel, Skis, Floats
      Cubcrafters NXCub
      King Air 350
      JMB VL-3
      Volcicopter VeloCity
      Third Party G3X Aircraft:
      ​Blacksqaure Velocty XL
      ​OrbX Blackwing BW635RG
      ​SimWorks Studios Vans RV14
      ​SimWorks Studios Vans RV10
      ​Parallel 42 Freedom Fox/Fox2 Series
      ​AirfoilLab Bristell B23
      BT Studio Kitfox STI (available from the MSFS Marketplace)
      ​FSReborn TL-Ultralight Sting S4

  • @denmay2005
    @denmay2005 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can you make tutorial vid how to setup for realsim g1000 to MSFS? thanks

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely. I'm tackling a handful of these at a time and it is on the list!

  • @thebigbilltheory4388
    @thebigbilltheory4388 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this process the same for the 430 in MSFS 2020 as well? That’s a lot going on.

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No it's more simple than that, but still a few steps:
      - Right Alt key > Single Left Click (to pop out the display)
      - Drag to desired monitor
      - Resize to remove the black bars on the side
      - Right Alt and Enter (to make full screen)
      Let me find the article that goes over this for you. Apologies I plan on making the MSFS videos for all of our components later this year

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hit CTRL+F to search for "Pop Out Screens" in the article. That's the section you'll need to refer to (It's the second section from the bottom)
      help.realsimgear.com/en/articles/4460892-microsoft-flight-simulator-2020-complete-set-up-guide#pop-out-screens

    • @thebigbilltheory4388
      @thebigbilltheory4388 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RealSimGear thank you for getting back to me. I’m buying a plane with a 430w in it and wanted to be familiar before I pick up the plane next month. Thank you for helping.

  • @martygenska8117
    @martygenska8117 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good stuff; still don't understand why, with the cost of these things, you don't include an HDMI cable.

    • @bobbyd6680
      @bobbyd6680 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Different length requirement needs?

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep Bobby that's correct. Some folks need 3ft, more, less, or they're going into a Display port

  • @AVIANCASAMACES
    @AVIANCASAMACES 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can it be used with the Cessna 172 ?

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      MSFS would need to have a Cessna 172 with a G3X unit. Which as of right now it does not. But if it ever does it will

  • @nabeelkhalid1505
    @nabeelkhalid1505 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So we have to to this every time we start a game or it is one time process and if we change the plane then what?

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a one time set up, per aircraft. Unless you start moving things around in the Windows Display Settings, then you may need to readjust the position coordinates.

    • @nabeelkhalid1505
      @nabeelkhalid1505 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RealSimGear so if we change the craft we have to do it all over again?

    • @AtlanticFlyer
      @AtlanticFlyer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nabeelkhalid1505 Yes, but you can copy a profile from one aircraft to another and adjust the capture point (green mapping circle) for the new aircraft while you retain all your original settings.

  • @ColinRichardson
    @ColinRichardson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks nice.. Will you be coming out with a USB-C version?
    I don't have any USB-A ports, and feels horrible having to buy a specialised USB-C to USB-B cable when everything else I own is all USB-C for everything.

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately a USB C version isn't something we have in the works :/

  • @Aviation_4223
    @Aviation_4223 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can i use it on xbox s

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately this does not work with X box

  • @ClinchRiverHomestead
    @ClinchRiverHomestead 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why do you need 3rd party software to use your hardware? What if the dev of pop.out panel manager stops the application ? 🤔 why don't you have your own software for your hardware? I don't understand .

    • @RealSimGear
      @RealSimGear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The reason we need to use Pop Out Manager is simple: It's the only solution that exists at the moment to use touch screens in MSFS that doesn't require extensive additional resources from us to develop.
      Pop Out Panel Manager has been around for two years, and has a regular update cycle with each version of MSFS. It has been vetted by our support team who use it on a daily basis to overcome some of the challenges with the current version of Microsoft Flight Simulator. Pop Out Panel Manager is open source and we have discussed this in the past at possibly creating our own version when the time and resources become available.

    • @ClinchRiverHomestead
      @ClinchRiverHomestead 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Again proves my point if the developer of pop out panel stops developing or turns off the product somehow your hardware doesn't work . When you charge people the money you do for your hardware you should have your own software to use it. Are you paying the developer of pop out panel for the use of his or her software ? If not you should be . They created a free software for us to use not for hug companies to piggy back off it to make money for themselves. The developer of pop out panel should also get a piece of the money to keep the project open and available for you to use because you charge people for your product and their software is crucial for your hardware to function .

    • @AtlanticFlyer
      @AtlanticFlyer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ClinchRiverHomestead If your theory were correct, which it's not by the way, then Apple, Samsung, SpaceDesk, and any other touch capable device would need to pay the developer of Pop Out Manager for their product to work. Perhaps you would like to look a the root cause for this limitation, which is Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, and ask yourself: Why hasn't Asobo fixed this themselves or approached the developer of POPM like they did with Working Title and pay them to improve the base product?
      If your theory were correct, then any hardware company that creates a product for use with specific aircraft or simulator platforms should be paying the software developers for their product to work. So Honeycomb, VirtualFly, Turtle Beach, CPFlight, RealSimGear, SimIonic, ect.. should be paying out Asobo, Laminar, PMDG, or any other developer, for their products to function and have a useful purpose for their existence?