@nowgrownup Maggie and Edwina gave Sir Jimmy a job at Broadmoor. The BBC covered up for him. The police didn't investigate all the claims. The hospitals covered up for him. The charities preferred the money over the victim's welfare. King Charles liked his friend and Mountbatten introduced him to Royalty. Look upwards for the folks who never got investigated.
He's an actor. He's portrayed Sir Savile as a creepy individual. Vitriol should be aimed at the people involved in the cover up. BBC bosses, police, Royalty, parliament etc.
@@andrewoliver8930 ========= Getting a commedian to play a sexual predator on Saville's scale just shows the BBC think its all a joke. ========= Now re-read it. Who have I targetted in the post? The BBC and Savile.
The issue is that there were a lot of people who were to blame for Savile who knew of his activities and did nothing to stop it it's the victims who should be remembered not Savile
Completely disagree with the views expressed here. Examining the terrible crimes of people and how they operate & how they get away with it is an important thing to do. Watched the first episode tonight & it was very well done & obviously has support of a number of his victims at the very least.
I agree with you I thought the drama was very good, but I personally don't see it as a very comprehensive account of him. I also wish it would of went into his business in the 1940s when he was a cyclist.
Come on "Verify", the fact checker of BBC, get Marianna Spring on the job, and OUT the scoundrels who knew and covered up this outrageous scandal. Go on, I dare you.
I think it was helpful to see how he was able to get away with it and serves as a warning that this can still happen. It's important to know that and be aware of that.
I actually though it was good. Coogan was excellent in this. Bringing in the real victims in this mini series was a good call. Had their voices heard too at the beginning.
I know why people won’t like this . I think it’s an important drama. There is always something to learn about the behaviour of everyone. I mean the institutions involved ! Thought Steve Coogan was amazing in it
It's too soon maybe. I just watched "The Long Shadow" about the Sutcliff victims and the police botched hunt for him. It was sympathetically made and showed the situation from the victims side. Perhaps if the Savile drama was made with this point of view it would be more acceptable. Maybe the BBC wanted to make it before anyone else to try and protect themselves.
@freepress3788 The BBC have made this program to frame a counter argument against the charge that they allowed Savile to get away with it. That's all this is, it's not about ratings or entertainment if you watch closely I bet it will carefully convey how the BBC were unaware or caught off guard. It's just a cover piece to make the BBC look innocent. And Steve Coogan, well, I have been struggling for years to ever find any of his stuff funny. Is he funny? It's either really funny and it's gone over my head or the emperor has no clothes.
If actors have to get into the mindset of the character they are portraying then I think there must be something very wrong with Coogan for even considering the portrayal of Savile....I wont be watching that's for sure....
That's the trouble with method acting. Living the part is damaging. Just act. "Know your lines, hit your marks and don't bump into the furniture." Bette Davis.
Nobody is forcing anyone to watch. I for one would want to know how this dreadful man got away with it for so long. Not sure the bbc made this entirely themselves and a good job too. Personally I think the bbc should be shut down, there has been so much sleaze been associated with this institution it's licence to broadcast ought to be revoked.
And the BBC still has the nerve to ask for a TV license fee, Huge amounts of that money which allegedly 86% goes to the BBC for programming has been used to pay for the many lawsuits by victims and to pay defense lawyers and counselors, for the many low life employees that have gone through their doors, since Aunty took to the Air.
This was a horrible thing to watch and really and truly the BBC should be held accountable for Jimmy Savile's activities, as well as the hospitals involved and anyone who covered up for him.
Michael Williams Thomas wasn’t the man who exposed Jimmy Savile. It was Merion Jones who actually exposed Savile. Merion Jones had been investigating Savile since the early 80s. And it was his documentary on Newsnight that was first expose Savile that got shelved by the BBC. Mark Williams Thomas does deserve credit for bringing the documentary to expose Savile to ITV. But all the ground work was done for him by Merion Jones, who deserves more recognition and praise.
Maybe we need to see this, it shows us what the Police knew and never did anything about it, and are still turning a blind eye to people/child trafficing. We should all be up in arms to pressurise the Police to do the job their paid for..... Caro in UK
They didn’t touch on the cover up aspect anywhere near enough or his links to the royal family. Maybe the show needed to be longer or not made by the bbc who were trying to cover up their part in this
@@jackninetynine5036 to be honest, I doubt it mattered who made the programme, can you see any of them attacking the King? From what I’ve seen & read, Charles was the only one who appeared to be his ‘friend’ for want of a better word!
@@BK10011 but it’s important context to how powerful he was, I don’t believe it was only Charles. BBC definitely avoided this on purpose but then u can’t make the show & only show what u want
@@jackninetynine5036 well in my opinion, they showed exactly that! What they wanted to show! as in it was basically all him and no blame on people who stood by and let him get away it… I’ve heard testimony from many who said there were so many who knew…they are as guilty by association….
whoever at the BBC decided this would be a good idea and people wanted to watch about this vile human being is beyond words let alone how the victims feel, i for one will never watch this or anything at all to do with this disgusting piece of dirt, the BBC looking for ratings on something they allowed to happen and shame on the actors involved in this distasteful drama.😡
I heard it wasn't all done by the BBC as ITV made it so I heard a few of the victims actually want it to be shown in the hope that other people can learn from it, be aware of behaviour signs of anyone they've met or know and for parents to tell their kids, teenagers, anyother people they know that if they've been in or are in a situation where they've felt uncomfortable or someone has made ( is making) them feel uncomfortable that it's ok to come to them and tell them and not to be ashamed and it's not their fault. We already watch dramas/ films on rapists, murderers, people who torture and have allowed torture and every single situation there are victims or families of victims that are suffering. And unfortunately we can't hide from it as we need to be aware of it and to learn from it, to not let it happen.
Average pdf abuses 115 children before they are stopped. 1 in 3 kids stay quiet, but the other 2 DO say something. This means we fail roughly an average of 90 kids per perp. 🤦🏻♀️ we NEED to make a doc about how we FAIL and why.
Anyone who doesn't think the British police covered up for him and the BBC are stupid. As for king Charlie how wouldn't he have known he's got the police and mi5 or whatever they call themselves investigating everyone who has contact with the Royals. Remember he could just walk into Buckingham Palace and mix with the Royals. Maybe a program should be made about why Charlie let him get away with it. The police might dismiss young working class girls statements ( reminds me of the Muslim rape gangs police scared to do anything. ) But they wouldn't have dismissed Charlie if he spoken up. But it wasn't Charlie's children or was it maybe that's why king Charlie seems so scared to call out his son's lies.
How any actor who has even half a shred of basic decency,can think of being even the slightest bit involved with this disgusting charade,beats me. Never liked Coogan-now I think he's more than utterly contemptible. Have absolutely no intention of watching anything to do with the creep Saville. He's in the ground,the best place for him and should be forgotten about.
Perhaps he SHOULD be forgotten about but the reality is that he never will be. To dismiss what happened or sweep it under the carpet would be far more insulting for those who suffered because of it than bringing it out into the open is for those who did not.
Someone is cashing in on Jimmy Saville’s vile life. This is what I don’t like. It’s been glamorised. I suppose it happens with most high profile stories but I still find it sad.
Where is all the outrage for movies and TV series about serial killers and true life crimes? This drama is exactly the same thing! I’ve watched it and it does not glorify Saville, it’s about the victims and how he was to hide in plain sight. Its no different to making a movie about The Krays.
I think this is a good docudrama for several reasons. It’s pretty brave of the BBC to do this in the first place as they themselves are in the firing line. It also serves as a warning about how this can happen, and perhaps avoided. It’s also very sympathetic to the victims. Remember, the fact of the matter is, he managed to fool the vast majority of the population. That’s a good enough reason to make it alone.
Like much of the evil and conflict today people are getting harmed and killed, under the notion of the great good. The same applys to Saville, hundreds of victims suffered because the people around him allowed it to happen... why? Well, he raised over 40 million for charity and when he died left 4.3 million to charity. The question and debate is how many lives did he help and transform?
Commentators and others who like to comment on whether this should have been made/ shown I think should consider the fact that as you can see, some of the victims appeared wanting to discuss their story..I’ve seen one of them on GMB! Therefore there are many directly affected who definitely want the story to be told… I believe they should stop speaking for others..if the victims in some way need this to be told, then it’s not for anyone to judge…. I do however question why the BBC wanted to make this in the first place…there is little or no focus on the BBC apart from the odd ‘chat’ in a room with little transpiring from it… We’ve seen in recent months that the tv celebrity cover ups are still present today, so it would appear little or nothing has been learnt. I also find it rather ironic that this guy being interviewed by Mike is spouting off about his programme/podcasts on the very same subject and he’s even claiming he knows more about Saville than anyone else!! He goes on to say “nobody from the BBC spoke to me” it almost sounds like he’s annoyed…he even said ‘I found it shocking they didn’t approach me” I find this interview hypocritical based on what this ‘x’ police officer appears angry about…..
Its really entertaining thats why its made and saville was a legend and the bbc didnt care what he was up to as far as the bbc concerned he was a fun guy and the public are also to blame for watching him and voting him three times as the favourite D.J in the 1970s
Hang on…. I think we need to see this program!!! WHO else is like this evil creature… Philip Schofield, that Hue Fella?? WHO ELSE needs to be exposed for doing the WRONG THINGS!!!🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
are the BBC attempting to immortalise jimmy saville? it is tasteless that theyre doing this for halloween. i have to wonder what saville wrote in his last will and testament to be fulfilled by others for him and his legacy.
Have you watched Shindlers List? I bet you have! Any movie or TV adaptations of monsters? It shows what we all need to know. Yet again hypothetical journalism
Jimmy Savile: A "sex offender" that everyone vilifies, despite the fact that there was never a trial. Russell Brand: A "sex offender" that everyone defends, because there has never been a trial. You can't have it both ways, folks.
The problem with Brand is that it doesn't add up. If you look at the Zeitgeist, the establishment is going after the alternatives to them. They are very scared, and rightly so. Cover ups like Savile were their doing.
@@Nickle314 So, because Brand has an alternative point of view means he can't be a pervert? For what it's worth, I think they're BOTH guilty, but fact remains they've also BOTH been cancelled without trial, JS to a ridiculous level (ie. I can't buy a 1965 Gerry and The Pacemakers movie on DVD because Savile has a cameo in it).
@@peterchecksfield9958 I think its unlikely. The numbers I've seen are that he's slept with 4000 women. The reports were saying the women were throwing themselves at him. Next, lets look at a real predator. Ted Bundy. How did he get his women? He was nice to them. They went with him, then he hit them with a hammer. In his case, the victims didn't complain, they were dead. So after 20 years, with no complaints as confirmed by the Met, why now? Next look at your exes. How what percentage are completely stable? Apply that percentage to 4,000. Where are the complaints? Where are the accusations? Strikes me that the complainants are most likely annoyed he didn't ring after a one nighter. So one a probability basis, it doesn't add up. So timing and the behaviour of the MSM. Who was coordinating since it was a coordinated attack? Why now? It's because its the current method of the elite to silence opponents. Why did they advertise for more accusers? Why didn't they do the same for Edwards and Schofield? Occams Razor tells you what's going on.
That's subjective and irrelevant, my point was he is getting rave reviews for his portrayal so it will be a career boost if anything. Watched the first episode and the abuse scenes are unsettling, difficult to watch so I appreciate some won't watch but many will. @@andystreet4022
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
I’d like to see a documentary about the cover up.
Ditto.
I d rather watch the live court case as they prosecuted those involved.
@@gameofjones4644 Exactly.
@@gameofjones4644 Even better.
💯
Regardless of what people think, Steve Coogan’s performance was amazing.
Coogan has made a bad career move ...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Having just checked the ratings, I would say not.
erm literally the opposite @@nowgrownup
@@nowgrownupseeing the plaudits he’s getting for his performance, quite the opposite. Which I’m sure will disappoint you
The BBC should be held to account for this.
It is an outrage to glorify a vile despicable individual.
No-one is glorifying Savile.
How is it glorifying him? He's portrayed as a seedy individual.
If this is glorification, I really wouldn't want to be the subject of a scathingly negative ITV/BBC depiction.
If this doesn't convince people to defund the bbc what will?
What a bizarre thing to say.
@@bencornish6910 Idiotic more like
Erm… “Ready Steady Cook”?
Vile BBC. I’m a survivor of CSA and this hurts me. We have to live with it everyday. My heart goes out to them. 😢
The series was made with guidance from his victims
I think the world needs to know about this.
Better left in history, no one wants reminding of the vile man.
Burying it so the establishment don't get looked at for their role in his crimes?
Strange.
@@andrewoliver8930No the BBC made money out of showing it Coogan got a fat paycheck making money out of victims 😂😂😂😂
@nowgrownup Maggie and Edwina gave Sir Jimmy a job at Broadmoor. The BBC covered up for him. The police didn't investigate all the claims. The hospitals covered up for him. The charities preferred the money over the victim's welfare. King Charles liked his friend and Mountbatten introduced him to Royalty. Look upwards for the folks who never got investigated.
@@nowgrownupthe BBC aren’t getting any money for it, are you dense?
Getting a commedian to play a sexual predator on Saville's scale just shows the BBC think its all a joke.
Yes 100%.It's just Alan Partridge in a blonde wig.
What a ridiculous thing to say…Coogan has played several dramatic roles now and is a very credible performer.
It's spot on. It's about the BBC and their thinking on Savile. @@bencornish6910
He's an actor. He's portrayed Sir Savile as a creepy individual.
Vitriol should be aimed at the people involved in the cover up. BBC bosses, police, Royalty, parliament etc.
@@andrewoliver8930
=========
Getting a commedian to play a sexual predator on Saville's scale just shows the BBC think its all a joke.
=========
Now re-read it. Who have I targetted in the post?
The BBC and Savile.
The issue is that there were a lot of people who were to blame for Savile who knew of his activities and did nothing to stop it it's the victims who should be remembered not Savile
Each episode begins with interviews from his victims.
Completely disagree with the views expressed here. Examining the terrible crimes of people and how they operate & how they get away with it is an important thing to do. Watched the first episode tonight & it was very well done & obviously has support of a number of his victims at the very least.
I agree with you I thought the drama was very good, but I personally don't see it as a very comprehensive account of him.
I also wish it would of went into his business in the 1940s when he was a cyclist.
I wonder how many bent lawyers was involved off the cover up and all the folks what knew about him, they should be named and shamed..
Come on "Verify", the fact checker of BBC, get Marianna Spring on the job, and OUT the scoundrels who knew and covered up this outrageous scandal. Go on, I dare you.
When working in T.V. there is not a lot you can do everyone wants to keep their job and not to lose the friendship of their colleagues
I think it was helpful to see how he was able to get away with it and serves as a warning that this can still happen. It's important to know that and be aware of that.
I actually though it was good. Coogan was excellent in this. Bringing in the real victims in this mini series was a good call. Had their voices heard too at the beginning.
Really 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@nowgrownup Yes, really.
I know why people won’t like this . I think it’s an important drama. There is always something to learn about the behaviour of everyone. I mean the institutions involved ! Thought Steve Coogan was amazing in it
This needed to be aired for awareness
It's too soon maybe. I just watched "The Long Shadow" about the Sutcliff victims and the police botched hunt for him. It was sympathetically made and showed the situation from the victims side. Perhaps if the Savile drama was made with this point of view it would be more acceptable. Maybe the BBC wanted to make it before anyone else to try and protect themselves.
There should be no protection whatsoever. The arrogance of these people is simply beyond belief.
The bbc didnt make it, produced by itv
I'll not watch anything Coogan is in in the future (not that I watched anything with him in it much in the past).🤷♀️🤦♀️
He was brilliant as Stan Laurel.
Don't tell him that or he might get hacked off and sue for libel.
@freepress3788 The BBC have made this program to frame a counter argument against the charge that they allowed Savile to get away with it. That's all this is, it's not about ratings or entertainment if you watch closely I bet it will carefully convey how the BBC were unaware or caught off guard. It's just a cover piece to make the BBC look innocent. And Steve Coogan, well, I have been struggling for years to ever find any of his stuff funny. Is he funny? It's either really funny and it's gone over my head or the emperor has no clothes.
People complain about this but will watch real serial killers shows
If actors have to get into the mindset of the character they are portraying then I think there must be something very wrong with Coogan for even considering the portrayal of Savile....I wont be watching that's for sure....
That's the trouble with method acting. Living the part is damaging. Just act. "Know your lines, hit your marks and don't bump into the furniture." Bette Davis.
@@dcollins4679 That was Spencer Tracy's quote about acting.
Steve Coogan Should Win 🏆 an Oscar Award for His Bravery for Playing Jimmy Savile!!!
Should not have been made, disgusting.
Nobody is forcing anyone to watch. I for one would want to know how this dreadful man got away with it for so long. Not sure the bbc made this entirely themselves and a good job too. Personally I think the bbc should be shut down, there has been so much sleaze been associated with this institution it's licence to broadcast ought to be revoked.
And the BBC still has the nerve to ask for a TV license fee, Huge amounts of that money which allegedly 86% goes to the BBC for programming has been used to pay for the many lawsuits by victims and to pay defense lawyers and counselors, for the many low life employees that have gone through their doors, since Aunty took to the Air.
This was a horrible thing to watch and really and truly the BBC should be held accountable for Jimmy Savile's activities, as well as the hospitals involved and anyone who covered up for him.
The BBC…. 🤮🤮🤮
Tell the story. Otherwise its cancel culture and censorship.
I think this story should be told so people can understand what those kids went through, I don't agree with the BBC doing it tho
Saville the creep fooled King Charles, NHS, Catholic church etc ,not just the BBC.
Coogan does an excellent job.
Michael Williams Thomas wasn’t the man who exposed Jimmy Savile. It was Merion Jones who actually exposed Savile.
Merion Jones had been investigating Savile since the early 80s. And it was his documentary on Newsnight that was first expose Savile that got shelved by the BBC.
Mark Williams Thomas does deserve credit for bringing the documentary to expose Savile to ITV. But all the ground work was done for him by Merion Jones, who deserves more recognition and praise.
It was exploitation. How much money did it pull in. Pedophilia is rife and too many brown envelopes and promotions are involved.
Steve c, defiantly for BAFTA, he should get an Oscar for best actor really,.
Maybe we need to see this, it shows us what the Police knew and never did anything about it, and are still turning a blind eye to people/child trafficing. We should all be up in arms to pressurise the Police to do the job their paid for..... Caro in UK
I don’t think it showed anything of the sort tbh! There was little of no reference to the police at all
They didn’t touch on the cover up aspect anywhere near enough or his links to the royal family. Maybe the show needed to be longer or not made by the bbc who were trying to cover up their part in this
@@jackninetynine5036 to be honest, I doubt it mattered who made the programme, can you see any of them attacking the King? From what I’ve seen & read, Charles was the only one who appeared to be his ‘friend’ for want of a better word!
@@BK10011 but it’s important context to how powerful he was, I don’t believe it was only Charles. BBC definitely avoided this on purpose but then u can’t make the show & only show what u want
@@jackninetynine5036 well in my opinion, they showed exactly that! What they wanted to show! as in it was basically all him and no blame on people who stood by and let him get away it… I’ve heard testimony from many who said there were so many who knew…they are as guilty by association….
that mans face should never be shown again its not a drama what he did very sad this even thought of let him rot think of his victims
The reason this is so wrong is because Savile's full extent of criminality is unknown
whoever at the BBC decided this would be a good idea and people wanted to watch about this vile human being is beyond words let alone how the victims feel, i for one will never watch this or anything at all to do with this disgusting piece of dirt, the BBC looking for ratings on something they allowed to happen and shame on the actors involved in this distasteful drama.😡
I heard it wasn't all done by the BBC as ITV made it so I heard a few of the victims actually want it to be shown in the hope that other people can learn from it, be aware of behaviour signs of anyone they've met or know and for parents to tell their kids, teenagers, anyother people they know that if they've been in or are in a situation where they've felt uncomfortable or someone has made ( is making) them feel uncomfortable that it's ok to come to them and tell them and not to be ashamed and it's not their fault. We already watch dramas/ films on rapists, murderers, people who torture and have allowed torture and every single situation there are victims or families of victims that are suffering. And unfortunately we can't hide from it as we need to be aware of it and to learn from it, to not let it happen.
Average pdf abuses 115 children before they are stopped. 1 in 3 kids stay quiet, but the other 2 DO say something. This means we fail roughly an average of 90 kids per perp. 🤦🏻♀️ we NEED to make a doc about how we FAIL and why.
Anyone who doesn't think the British police covered up for him and the BBC are stupid. As for king Charlie how wouldn't he have known he's got the police and mi5 or whatever they call themselves investigating everyone who has contact with the Royals. Remember he could just walk into Buckingham Palace and mix with the Royals. Maybe a program should be made about why Charlie let him get away with it. The police might dismiss young working class girls statements ( reminds me of the Muslim rape gangs police scared to do anything. ) But they wouldn't have dismissed Charlie if he spoken up. But it wasn't Charlie's children or was it maybe that's why king Charlie seems so scared to call out his son's lies.
That follow up to Exposure needs to be made!
Don’t like Coogan. Certainly wouldn’t watch this anyway
I like Mark Williams Thomas, he's so intelligent
Some things should be left untold indeed. What's the use of it? Embarrassment and pain. Not ok.
Seen 3 episodes now. It's the BBC trying to excuse themselves.
I don’t understand how someone would actually want to pretend to be such a vile person.
Actors play real life serial killers all the time. Numerous actors have played Hitler. I see no difference.
@@terrymurphy2032 Richard attenborough playing John Christie -one of his best performances
@@terrymurphy2032 My error, it was intended for lead comment
If anyone requires further additional reasons to stop paying the bbc poll tax, this is it.
As is everybody and anybody's right
BBC needs Defunded from public money 😮😮😮😮😮
How any actor who has even half a shred of basic decency,can think of being even the slightest bit involved with this disgusting charade,beats me. Never liked Coogan-now I think he's more than utterly contemptible. Have absolutely no intention of watching anything to do with the creep Saville. He's in the ground,the best place for him and should be forgotten about.
Oh sure lets sweep him under the carpet, pretend it didnt happen
Perhaps he SHOULD be forgotten about but the reality is that he never will be. To dismiss what happened or sweep it under the carpet would be far more insulting for those who suffered because of it than bringing it out into the open is for those who did not.
@@msimms-ft9yv I never said to forget his crimes.
@@adienowed6366 Well ok, but you did say-should be forgotten about
@@msimms-ft9yv Him yes-but victims never.
Someone is cashing in on Jimmy Saville’s vile life. This is what I don’t like. It’s been glamorised. I suppose it happens with most high profile stories but I still find it sad.
Surppressing a story told directly by his victims? Talk TV gone woke.
I don't Trust Anything the BBC Says!!! 😂
Cowards, insisting on having the last word.
Where is all the outrage for movies and TV series about serial killers and true life crimes? This drama is exactly the same thing! I’ve watched it and it does not glorify Saville, it’s about the victims and how he was to hide in plain sight. Its no different to making a movie about The Krays.
talk TV getting the hump with 'the Reckoning' but seems to give all sorts of dramas about serial killers and dictators a pass, is weird
I think this is a good docudrama for several reasons. It’s pretty brave of the BBC to do this in the first place as they themselves are in the firing line. It also serves as a warning about how this can happen, and perhaps avoided. It’s also very sympathetic to the victims. Remember, the fact of the matter is, he managed to fool the vast majority of the population. That’s a good enough reason to make it alone.
The BBC know exactly what they're doing.....this is their way of "holding themselves to account."
It's not made by the Bbc. It's made by ITV. Commissioned by the BBC.
Like much of the evil and conflict today people are getting harmed and killed, under the notion of the great good. The same applys to Saville, hundreds of victims suffered because the people around him allowed it to happen... why? Well, he raised over 40 million for charity and when he died left 4.3 million to charity. The question and debate is how many lives did he help and transform?
Why do Talk TV wheel out this man all the time? He exgerates his role in this all the time .Why?
Commentators and others who like to comment on whether this should have been made/ shown I think should consider the fact that as you can see, some of the victims appeared wanting to discuss their story..I’ve seen one of them on GMB! Therefore there are many directly affected who definitely want the story to be told… I believe they should stop speaking for others..if the victims in some way need this to be told, then it’s not for anyone to judge….
I do however question why the BBC wanted to make this in the first place…there is little or no focus on the BBC apart from the odd ‘chat’ in a room with little transpiring from it…
We’ve seen in recent months that the tv celebrity cover ups are still present today, so it would appear little or nothing has been learnt. I also find it rather ironic that this guy being interviewed by Mike is spouting off about his programme/podcasts on the very same subject and he’s even claiming he knows more about Saville than anyone else!! He goes on to say “nobody from the BBC spoke to me” it almost sounds like he’s annoyed…he even said ‘I found it shocking they didn’t approach me” I find this interview hypocritical based on what this ‘x’ police officer appears angry about…..
The bbc made Jimmy savile now there making us pay fees to watch a documentary on the beast ! Ffs
So did King Charles, Maggie, hospitals, charities, police.
Not one has been investigated.
Its really entertaining thats why its made and saville was a legend and the bbc didnt care what he was up to as far as the bbc concerned he was a fun guy and the public are also to blame for watching him and voting him three times as the favourite D.J in the 1970s
I don't know Coogan was a comedian any thing I've seen him in has been excruciating too watch
It’s pretty excruciating trying to make sense of your post. Do you not proof read before clicking send?
I love Mike Graham's show BUT could you turn his mic off when he's not speaking because the heavy breathing over the guests is sooo off putting!
Hang on…. I think we need to see this program!!! WHO else is like this evil creature… Philip Schofield, that Hue Fella?? WHO ELSE needs to be exposed for doing the WRONG THINGS!!!🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Used to date his sister - MWT not Saville.
are the BBC attempting to immortalise jimmy saville? it is tasteless that theyre doing this for halloween. i have to wonder what saville wrote in his last will and testament to be fulfilled by others for him and his legacy.
Better left untold? Seriously? You just dont wana talk about it at all?
Too many sanctimonious comments from the bbc haters
Have you watched Shindlers List? I bet you have! Any movie or TV adaptations of monsters? It shows what we all need to know. Yet again hypothetical journalism
Jimmy Savile: A "sex offender" that everyone vilifies, despite the fact that there was never a trial.
Russell Brand: A "sex offender" that everyone defends, because there has never been a trial.
You can't have it both ways, folks.
The problem with Brand is that it doesn't add up.
If you look at the Zeitgeist, the establishment is going after the alternatives to them.
They are very scared, and rightly so.
Cover ups like Savile were their doing.
@@Nickle314 So, because Brand has an alternative point of view means he can't be a pervert? For what it's worth, I think they're BOTH guilty, but fact remains they've also BOTH been cancelled without trial, JS to a ridiculous level (ie. I can't buy a 1965 Gerry and The Pacemakers movie on DVD because Savile has a cameo in it).
@@peterchecksfield9958 I think its unlikely.
The numbers I've seen are that he's slept with 4000 women. The reports were saying the women were throwing themselves at him.
Next, lets look at a real predator. Ted Bundy. How did he get his women? He was nice to them. They went with him, then he hit them with a hammer. In his case, the victims didn't complain, they were dead.
So after 20 years, with no complaints as confirmed by the Met, why now?
Next look at your exes. How what percentage are completely stable? Apply that percentage to 4,000. Where are the complaints? Where are the accusations? Strikes me that the complainants are most likely annoyed he didn't ring after a one nighter.
So one a probability basis, it doesn't add up.
So timing and the behaviour of the MSM. Who was coordinating since it was a coordinated attack?
Why now? It's because its the current method of the elite to silence opponents.
Why did they advertise for more accusers?
Why didn't they do the same for Edwards and Schofield?
Occams Razor tells you what's going on.
@@peterchecksfield9958 I think they're BOTH guilty
=======
Savile I agree.
Now present your evidence on Brand.
@@Nickle314 I haven't seen any evidence on Jimmy Savile, just unsubstantiated allegations on both.
Jim'll Fist It 🤩🏅 eurgh, eurgh, eurgh!
Eh? BBC 😉,
Amazing work by coogan, the people want this.
Steve Coogan....."Career Suicide" more like.
More the opposite, he's getting roundly praised and tipped for awards
@@maxfrasier .....no accounting for taste.
@@andystreet4022Yep. Least of all yours.
That's subjective and irrelevant, my point was he is getting rave reviews for his portrayal so it will be a career boost if anything. Watched the first episode and the abuse scenes are unsettling, difficult to watch so I appreciate some won't watch but many will. @@andystreet4022
Watch it, then decide?
Coogan, what are you thinking