I absolutely love the 1971-1973 Mustang Sportroof. It's one of my all time dream cars. I fell in love with it at age 15 in 1974 when a neighbor bought one. That high rear deck and almost horizontal rear window blew me away. And nearly 50 years later, it still does.
I once owned a 1970 Mach-1 with the 428CJ, but today I prefer the 1971 through '73 sportsroof bodies. They look like they're doing 150MPH standing still. I never understood why they were maligned as they were.
Bullshit , if you have ever sat in one you know that the interior is extremely small in comparison to the exterior , but I must admit that the style is timeless and it looks as modern as tomorrow.
Well, I guess size really does matter! 😁 At 6' 3" and 275 lbs I've never had any problems getting in or out of '71 - '73 Mustangs. The seats are comfortable and I have all the legroom I need. Now, if you're talking about the back seat I totally agree. Anyone over the age of 4 just won't fit. Even sideways doesn't really work. I've always thought of the Big Body Mustangs as fitting 2 1/2 people! 😁👍
The 71-73s weren't all that big. They were more wide and low compared to earlier models. The fastback version gives the illusion of it being a big car, but if you look at the notchback Grande, you can see that they weren't as big as people think
Always loved Mustangs.I used to ride to 7th grade basketball practice in my coach's brand new 1964&1/2 mustang. I've owned 2 of them. The newest one was a 1986 GT. I never found anything to dislike about them, including the 1971 which was beautiful with great performance options. Excellent Posting. Thank You
It was still a lot smaller than a full size American car of the same era. Which by the way was what every kid who took driver's ed learned on. It was a different time dude. The same mods that helped the original Mustang and every other American car handle i.e. fat tires & front and rear anti-sway bars, and properly valved shocks. It would still understeer at the limit but would also be able to go into a very controlled 4 wheel drift quite easily. It was also the last year for compression and I was buying 104 octane Sunoco 260 through the mid-70's.
I never drove a 71-73 Mustang, but used to own a 71 Cougar (same platform). With heavy duty shocks, thicket front and rear sway bars, and wider 60 series tires mounted on junkyard score 14x7 inch steel rims, it didn’t handle bad. I enjoyed trashing it.
Drove a 1971 Fastback back in the day - had a factory 429 SCJ with a C6 auto. It would drop down 15' of second gear rubber stock - was a fast car. It got 6 mpg - but gas was 35 cents a GALLON :)
I had the 71 63D fastback 351C 2bbl for 18 years bought it for a song, used it, improved it, sold it to buy a place in the mountains. No regrets, still got the old antiques that last! And are actually worth something 😊😊😊
Had a '71 Mach 1 351C 4 speed yellow in color. Come 1980, I wanted a motorcycle. Sold the Mustang in mint condition for $2800. Went down to the local Honda dealership and bought a new CB750F. Dumb move.
Another factor in horsepower is that when you get up in 375 plus like the tourque from the 428 cj 429 cj and scj they have enough power to rip the unibody apart, seen it, need some reinforcement for all that awesome energy, great memories for us who owned them 😊😊😊😊
Okay I've been waiting for someone to talk about the beast of 1971 Mustangs that I owned, yea the Boss 351 was hot, but not as hot as the Mach1 429 SCJ not to me mistaken for 429 CJ which pops up 99.9% of the time. The difference between the 429 SUPER COBRA JET W/ DRAG PAK and COBRA JET was the SCJ was a solid lifter cam like the Boss 351, The SCJ was rated at 375hp for insurance, it got air & gas from a Holley 780cfm double pumper carb, pumped out more like 450hp came with C6 auto 3:91 Posi traction 9inch, trans cooler, no air, staggered shocks, I hate that I sold mine after having it 12yrs, I was young, dumb didn't realize how special it was they made 500 SCJs to this day the place I've seen one like I had a real "SCJ" is rolling cross the block on Barrett Jackson sold for 176,000 and no the boss 351 was not faster than the 429 super cobra Jet solid lifter, mine was the same grabber green as the one in your video.
One of the dearest Mustang is the 1972 Ford Mustang HO. It was a slightly detuned Boss 351, Ford only made a few hundred of these. They made over 1,300 Boss 351
My dad worked for Holman and Moody from the late 60's to the early 70's. He told me about a German client that wanted a Mustang that would blow the doors off anything on the Autobahn. They built it and got pulled over/roadblocked for test driving it on Wilkinson Boulevard, going over 180 mph. Dunno if it's true, but I would like to believe that it is.
The negative comments in this video about this generation are simply absurd. "Bigger than my apartment"? You know, if you're too short to reach the foot pedals, maybe this car is not for you. The prior pony cars had much to dislike. Try putting a 429 in a '66 to '70. This generation is by far the best looking with many improvements, The engineers got it right and understood what the market wanted. You take issue with hidden wipers? Really? "Surprise"? Face it; you want one.
Those mustangs were AWESOME! Sadly after that we got the Mustang 2 or a pinto with the mustang name. And spare me the "it saved the mustang " I hated them. It was for a generation raised during gas shortages. ALL CARS WERE DOWNSIZED.
They're just about the same size as a 2023 Mustang, give or take an inch. They are lower though, which gives them that long sleek look. Bigger than the previous generations and other generations that came after, but so are the modern Mustangs starting with the S197. I own both, but if you don't, look at the specs.
It was the 1971 model that made me fall inlove with Mustang and their were alot of them in Jamaica but the fuel crisis of 73 spoiled the show. Today their is only one I now about on the roads.
Maybe it wasn't as "pure" as the earlier Mustangs, but it's undeniable that the 71-73 Mustangs are sleek and awesome looking cars. Plus, it had appearances in the original Gone in 60 Seconds and even a James Bond film, Diamonds Are Forever.
I think the reviews are given by what us big guys call small man's syndrome. I have 1 of these cars,ive owned all of them up to73. Up to 69 mustangs were (like the ausies put it) nothing but a falcon in a suit. The cars were a structural wimp. The power of the 70s would have turned it inside out. 69/70 were a little better but still structural weak. Finally ford got up to speed in 71,they built around there new power plants a car that can easily deal with 500ft,pounds of torq out of the factory. And large enough to acomadate a 6ft200 pound guy like me😂. But I get it the little people can't even reach the top kitchen cubbies😂😂😂.
By '71, the Mustang had turned into a 'Poor Man's Thunderbird' and sales suffered as a result. This is the generation of Mustang that made buyers happy to see the Mustang II! 😂
Opinions are like belly buttons. That said, I think this is the best looking of the original generation Mustang's. People complain of the weight, but it weighs 3,400 pounds. Today's Mustang weighs about 4,000 when fully equipped. All things considered it isn't that heavy.
How did Ford compete with * both * the GM Firebird/Camaro * and * the Corvette at the same time with one car? Introduce the '71 Mustang! Problem solved with one car model - Easy Peazy, let's grab a beer on the way for the weekend...!
HI, I HAD A SCJ 71 COBRA JET DRAG PACK MUZZ , QUICKISH , IT BELONGED TO RICHARD BRANSON OF VIRGIN RECORD FAME IN KIDLINGTON OXFORDSHIRE REG MGJ 25L IT WAS A LONG TIME AGO ABOUT 78 ISH AS FAR AS I CAN REMEMBER, RED BLACK HOOD , I SAY QUICKISH AS COMPARED TO MY OLD 1200 HP VORTECH SUPERCHARGED STINGRAY IT WAS A GAY GOLF CART HAHA
That 351 boss Cleveland would shut them all down at the drag strip 330 horse Ford was sandbagging that number that boss was putting 450 to the ground son
Ford would be about right saying it made 330hp @ 5400rpm. Thing is it could make peak hp much higher than that. Clevelands typically make around 400hp by 6000rpm & 450 if you take them to 6500rpm.
@@douglorimer5985 I keep waiting. Thought of getting the Cleveland 4 speed car for my daughter when she turns 16. Owner of the cars said it's too much car for her. The other is a 429 scj.
I was not able to watch this video, you are trying to make a video for kids about something that is over 50 years old, complete fail it is plain stupid
I absolutely love the 1971-1973 Mustang Sportroof. It's one of my all time dream cars. I fell in love with it at age 15 in 1974 when a neighbor bought one. That high rear deck and almost horizontal rear window blew me away. And nearly 50 years later, it still does.
I once owned a 1970 Mach-1 with the 428CJ, but today I prefer the 1971 through '73 sportsroof bodies. They look like they're doing 150MPH standing still. I never understood why they were maligned as they were.
You guys might of forgotten of it.. This car is super cool and its not forgotten at all
Bullshit , if you have ever sat in one you know that the interior is extremely small in comparison to the exterior , but I must admit that the style is timeless and it looks as modern as tomorrow.
Well, I guess size really does matter! 😁 At 6' 3" and 275 lbs I've never had any problems getting in or out of '71 - '73 Mustangs. The seats are comfortable and I have all the legroom I need. Now, if you're talking about the back seat I totally agree. Anyone over the age of 4 just won't fit. Even sideways doesn't really work. I've always thought of the Big Body Mustangs as fitting 2 1/2 people! 😁👍
You must be a big person because the interior is not small
The car looks bigger than it really is. I have one and it’s big for an older mustang but it’s not really that big.
The 71-73s weren't all that big. They were more wide and low compared to earlier models. The fastback version gives the illusion of it being a big car, but if you look at the notchback Grande, you can see that they weren't as big as people think
Son ! You are too young to accurately appreciate this car..
a “4-B-B-L carburetor”??? We used to just call them 4-barrel…. But the narrator does sound like he was born at least 20 years after the car was made
Oh boy! I did a double take when I heard 4 bbl! Sounds like someone just reading a script rather than a car enthusiast reading the script.
In the script, it could have been written as '4v' and I still would have said 'four barrel'. 😂
@@aaroncostello8812 sounds like AI
@@jimlechuga3193 Or like somebody who simply doesn't know what a carburetor is. 😆
😂 thank you! Knew something was off when he read 3-9-1 rear.
One thing most people didn't realize was a fifth of Jim Beam fit perfectly in the center console
And when you wrap yourself round a tree when drunk, or worse kill someone, you will be screaming " Why, God, why did I do it?
@@artyfhartie2269 At least you'll have the alcohol to disinfect all the cuts and gashes you'll have. 🤷♂
@@c.j.cleveland7475 Most likely, you will be in a wheel chair for life paralysed from the neck down being fed, washed and cleaned by handlers
Actually, the T5 name was used in Germany since the very beginning of Mustangs, in 65.
It's of course going up in price now.
Most of what you don't like about the mach 1 is just what I like about it!
Always loved Mustangs.I used to ride to 7th grade basketball practice in my coach's brand new 1964&1/2 mustang. I've owned 2 of them. The newest one was a 1986 GT. I never found anything to dislike about them, including the 1971 which was beautiful with great performance options. Excellent Posting. Thank You
It was still a lot smaller than a full size American car of the same era. Which by the way was what every kid who took driver's ed learned on. It was a different time dude. The same mods that helped the original Mustang and every other American car handle i.e. fat tires & front and rear anti-sway bars, and properly valved shocks. It would still understeer at the limit but would also be able to go into a very controlled 4 wheel drift quite easily. It was also the last year for compression and I was buying 104 octane Sunoco 260 through the mid-70's.
I never drove a 71-73 Mustang, but used to own a 71 Cougar (same platform). With heavy duty shocks, thicket front and rear sway bars, and wider 60 series tires mounted on junkyard score 14x7 inch steel rims, it didn’t handle bad. I enjoyed trashing it.
The best Mustang ever built fantastic looking car and i love ❤it great show thank you very much from Sydney Australia
Drove a 1971 Fastback back in the day - had a factory 429 SCJ with a C6 auto. It would drop down 15' of second gear rubber stock - was a fast car. It got 6 mpg - but gas was 35 cents a GALLON :)
Ah this brings back memories of my '72 Mach 1 with the 351 Cleveland engine.
I had the 71 63D fastback 351C 2bbl for 18 years bought it for a song, used it, improved it, sold it to buy a place in the mountains. No regrets, still got the old antiques that last! And are actually worth something 😊😊😊
Yeah I drive a 429 cobra jet mach 1
You didn't mention the one-of-one 1971 Mustang Boss 302. Just an interesting side note.
Ya that was supposed to be destroyed, but they just pulled out the engine and sold it.
Had a '71 Mach 1 351C 4 speed yellow in color. Come 1980, I wanted a motorcycle. Sold the Mustang in mint condition for $2800. Went down to the local Honda dealership and bought a new CB750F. Dumb move.
You didn't tell me anything I forgot about the Mustang.
Another factor in horsepower is that when you get up in 375 plus like the tourque from the 428 cj 429 cj and scj they have enough power to rip the unibody apart, seen it, need some reinforcement for all that awesome energy, great memories for us who owned them 😊😊😊😊
Always reminds me of that movie gone in sixty seconds, the original movie 👌😁👍🏴
The only draw back to having one was you can't see well out the back, have to park smart
Make no mistake! The 429 SCJ and the Boss 351 would run. Both of these engines begged for a bigger cam.
Okay I've been waiting for someone to talk about the beast of 1971 Mustangs that I owned, yea the Boss 351 was hot, but not as hot as the Mach1 429 SCJ not to me mistaken for 429 CJ which pops up 99.9% of the time. The difference between the 429 SUPER COBRA JET W/ DRAG PAK and COBRA JET was the SCJ was a solid lifter cam like the Boss 351, The SCJ was rated at 375hp for insurance, it got air & gas from a Holley 780cfm double pumper carb, pumped out more like 450hp came with C6 auto 3:91 Posi traction 9inch, trans cooler, no air, staggered shocks, I hate that I sold mine after having it 12yrs, I was young, dumb didn't realize how special it was they made 500 SCJs to this day the place I've seen one like I had a real "SCJ" is rolling cross the block on Barrett Jackson sold for 176,000 and no the boss 351 was not faster than the 429 super cobra Jet solid lifter, mine was the same grabber green as the one in your video.
I’ve own a 71 grande 351 c 4 v fast ass car also I’m restoring a 71 sportsroof 351 c 4 v these cars don’t get the respect of the classic car world
One of the dearest Mustang is the 1972 Ford Mustang HO. It was a slightly detuned Boss 351, Ford only made a few hundred of these. They made over 1,300 Boss 351
My dad worked for Holman and Moody from the late 60's to the early 70's.
He told me about a German client that wanted a Mustang that would blow the doors off anything on the Autobahn.
They built it and got pulled over/roadblocked for test driving it on Wilkinson
Boulevard, going over
180 mph.
Dunno if it's true, but I would like to believe that it is.
The negative comments in this video about this generation are simply absurd. "Bigger than my apartment"? You know, if you're too short to reach the foot pedals, maybe this car is not for you. The prior pony cars had much to dislike. Try putting a 429 in a '66 to '70. This generation is by far the best looking with many improvements, The engineers got it right and understood what the market wanted. You take issue with hidden wipers? Really? "Surprise"? Face it; you want one.
Why so serious...
Those mustangs were AWESOME! Sadly after that we got the Mustang 2 or a pinto with the mustang name. And spare me the "it saved the mustang " I hated them. It was for a generation raised during gas shortages. ALL CARS WERE DOWNSIZED.
They're just about the same size as a 2023 Mustang, give or take an inch. They are lower though, which gives them that long sleek look. Bigger than the previous generations and other generations that came after, but so are the modern Mustangs starting with the S197. I own both, but if you don't, look at the specs.
It was the 1971 model that made me fall inlove with Mustang and their were alot of them in Jamaica but the fuel crisis of 73 spoiled the show. Today their is only one I now about on the roads.
Maybe it wasn't as "pure" as the earlier Mustangs, but it's undeniable that the 71-73 Mustangs are sleek and awesome looking cars. Plus, it had appearances in the original Gone in 60 Seconds and even a James Bond film, Diamonds Are Forever.
I think the reviews are given by what us big guys call small man's syndrome. I have 1 of these cars,ive owned all of them up to73. Up to 69 mustangs were (like the ausies put it) nothing but a falcon in a suit. The cars were a structural wimp. The power of the 70s would have turned it inside out. 69/70 were a little better but still structural weak. Finally ford got up to speed in 71,they built around there new power plants a car that can easily deal with 500ft,pounds of torq out of the factory. And large enough to acomadate a 6ft200 pound guy like me😂. But I get it the little people can't even reach the top kitchen cubbies😂😂😂.
Iaccoca hated it that is reason enough to love ❤️ every single thing about it
By '71, the Mustang had turned into a 'Poor Man's Thunderbird' and sales suffered as a result. This is the generation of Mustang that made buyers happy to see the Mustang II! 😂
This is my favorite mustang. It's like they saw a decade into the future and liked the delorean for styling.
64 1/2 to 70 were and will always be the desirable models for collectors
Yeah I like a good scoop, a good scoop of ice cream.
I LEARNED HOW TO DRIVE IN A MUSTANG.
So, I'm a owner of a 1971 grande coupe with 302cui engine.. Amazing car with a beautiful window a the rear..
They needed back up cameras then, the rear window was a bitch to see out of!
Opinions are like belly buttons. That said, I think this is the best looking of the original generation Mustang's. People complain of the weight, but it weighs 3,400 pounds. Today's Mustang weighs about 4,000 when fully equipped. All things considered it isn't that heavy.
number 2 and number 4 are the same.
Reminds me if the pinto!
Had a red 71 fastback 302 not a Mach 1 swapped it out with a 351. Cleavend out of a 71 Mercury Cyclone
The 71 to 73 Mustang used the same wheelbase as the Ford Grand Torino..
What a beautiful design.
The ultimate option was the holly 950 cfm NASCAR three barrel carb .
How did Ford compete with * both * the GM Firebird/Camaro * and * the Corvette at the same time with one car? Introduce the '71 Mustang! Problem solved with one car model - Easy Peazy, let's grab a beer on the way for the weekend...!
Ford didn't learn anything from the T-bird. That was supposed to be a Corvette rival, and look what it turned into.
69 70 fastbacks perfect looks and still power before gas crunch took v8 engine and made them 200ho boat anchors
$200,000!!!! Man I'm playing the powerball from now on! Who knows I just might win and I'll be able to own my dream car!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I have a 73 Mustang convertible. I'de like to learn more about it like value etc. Thank You
HI, I HAD A SCJ 71 COBRA JET DRAG PACK MUZZ , QUICKISH , IT BELONGED TO RICHARD BRANSON OF VIRGIN RECORD FAME IN KIDLINGTON OXFORDSHIRE REG MGJ 25L IT WAS A LONG TIME AGO ABOUT 78 ISH AS FAR AS I CAN REMEMBER, RED BLACK HOOD , I SAY QUICKISH AS COMPARED TO MY OLD 1200 HP VORTECH SUPERCHARGED STINGRAY IT WAS A GAY GOLF CART HAHA
Mr. Iacocca himself referred to this Mustang as a "fat pig". But, he absolutely loved the Mustang II, so make of that what you will.
The backseat was tiny and cramped 😂
The back seat was cramped and small. My mom had one.
Bogus pics and vids! Mustang with a blower motor ? Another pic shows a late Gen mach 1 interior...I quit watching at that point! BS !
Wonder what the red model from DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER is worth if it survived and was for sale.
Yes, check out muscle car review sometime in 86 , it survived.
I wish I could forget those cheese box Mustangs existed.
That 351 boss Cleveland would shut them all down at the drag strip 330 horse Ford was sandbagging that number that boss was putting 450 to the ground son
Ford would be about right saying it made 330hp @ 5400rpm. Thing is it could make peak hp much higher than that. Clevelands typically make around 400hp by 6000rpm & 450 if you take them to 6500rpm.
The best shape mustangs 1971 -1973 big for the time but if you put next to a new mustang about the same size
I know where two 71's are. But just can't bring myself to invest in them. Can't get your money and time out of them.
Things are changing.
@@douglorimer5985 I keep waiting.
Thought of getting the Cleveland 4 speed car for my daughter when she turns 16.
Owner of the cars said it's too much car for her.
The other is a 429 scj.
@@jesse75 I wouldn't put much power in it. And I'd make sure she got used to how they handled. Terrible snow cars. .
The lead sled 🛷
I was not able to watch this video, you are trying to make a video for kids about something that is over 50 years old, complete fail it is plain stupid
weighs less than current models check out the stats surprising
Why was it named T5?
Do you know anything about cars
Absolute POS don't fall for the BS.