You Killed Your Son! - Law & Order
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- An unfaithful husband must face the consequences for his infidelity...or will he?
Stream Law & Order on Peacock: pck.tv/46lNAcm
From Season 14, Episode 3 "Patient Zero" - When a vial of SARS is stolen during a carjacking, Briscoe and Green search for the first person to be infected - patient zero - in order to stop an epidemic.
Your favorite shows, movies and more are here. Stream now on Peacock: www.peacocktv.com
Subscribe: / @lawandordernbc
This is the official TH-cam channel for Law & Order. Watch all of the official clips from the series, some of the best moments from within the criminal justice system, where the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: The police, who investigate crime, and the district attorneys, who prosecute the offenders.
Watch Law & Order on Google Play: bit.ly/2IbIu71
Watch Law & Order on iTunes apple.co/2Ia46QZ
#Law&Order
The wife played the jury. She lied on purpose to messed with their heads. That’s why the creepy husband and wife got off.
Read Agatha Christie's " Witness for the Prosecution". A lesson on how to manipulate the truth and the jury. As soon as she started her crying testimony I thought of that story.
@@cynn3367 Agatha Christie was a GENIUS!! Thank you for writing that! Seeing your comment has made me determined to set up a beach chair in my livung room, don a silk caftan, sunglasses, big hat, and sip a champagne cocktail whilst watching, "Evil Under The Sun"!!! 🥂😎🥂
Did they ever manage to prove that she (or someone else) was guilty of murdering that little boy?
@@marycanary no this scene was at the end of the episode, the husband was found not guilty
I hope they bring them back in the revival, kill them off and their killer(s) get off.
Wow that is one twisted narcissist. Her husband is no better.
You had me at the first half, I thought you were talking about the lawyer that was sticking up for the husband.
Yeah, I thought unequally attracts each other but in this fall it‘s the other way around.
There just evil.....and fantastic actors
They belong together. A power-hungry woman and a cheating lowlife narcissist
They deserve each other
I don't know if it's full-on narcissism. That word gets thrown around a lot. She married for money and status, NOT for love and she probably knew he was a chronic cheater from the onset. As long as it created the perfect illusion and allusion of stability, mobility and wealth, she would tolerate everything else. If anything, it was next-level survival. The horrible tragedy is that two people had to pay the price for his proclivities. He should have been sent to jail.
Raise your hand if you’re confused.
She pretended to be mixed up in order to create reasonable doubt with the jury.
@@edwardokeavy5241 Me too, she cleverly victimized herself as a woman whose husband had affairs, while simultaneously trying to mar him, to confuse the jury; but she was doing it because she's fiercely loyal to her husband in a very sick and twisted way lol
Husband and wife were in it TOGETHER
Basically she confused the dumbJurors.
Since it's rarely to assume people can infect other people intentionally or unintentionally he is not held responsible.
But I think this case was messed up all in all...
@@samlsd9711 I admire your nom de plume.
"The Truth. Whatever that is." Still accurate, and everyone still wondering what went wrong with society.
Society is made of people. Problems in society are the symptoms of what’s wrong with the people
_"WMDs and "mobile launchers in Iraq."_ And Urban Moving Systems had nothing to do with that day in September of 2001?!
Doesn't help when people started to change THE truth into "MY" truth.
@@brokenman58 😂🤣😂 SOOO TRUE👏👏👏
The truth is what actually physically happened in this case anyway
The wife was brilliant--playing on society's bias about marital relationships to win the whole ball game. Unfortunately, through youth or inexperience, ADA Southerland missed the writing on the wall when the wife explained how the same women willing to divorce for infidelity would willingly stand by their spouse accused of embezzlement or murder.
She literally told Sutherland what she was going to do, stand by her spouse accused of murder.
Rfftwbc in hñj j m movies and then the first
Those are completely different things than having your spouse cheat on you. I've never been married so odds are I'm going to get something wrong, but it always seemed to me that when your spouse cheats on you the trust is broken because they are giving away something that is supposed to be shared only with the one you married. If your spouse is accused of embezzlement or murder then that's a situation where the wife or husband is of the mindset that their spouse is innocent of the crime until it is proven otherwise.
@@lucindamobley5492 depends on how you view fidelity. open marriages exist. it's only cheating if he doesn't have her consent, which he clearly does. i see her point about women willing to divorce over infidelity but not murder, but i don't see how that telegraphs her intent to stay married through infidelity AND murder.
@@dietotaku For me the idea of an open marriage feels like an invitation for more problems to enter the relationship than people think can be solved. God always intended for us to remain pure until we marry (men and women alike) because we would get hurt otherwise. And even then God can use what we do wrong for good.
IRL, they would have
1) Had it called a mistrial in the first place.
2) Counted her admission in the end as exactly that: An admission. In front of officers of the court. With the testimony of her admission by _even her own defence attorney_ , she would have been processed by the judge in a speedy trial. No jury needed, because confession.
Could she have gotten away with it if she didn't spill the beans? (for the audience's sake, after all)
👋🏿 I do
This woman is the bond villain of bad legal ideas. She masterminds this evil plot to "get out of a perjury charge" and then proceeds to tell it to 3 officers of the court in the middle of a DA conference room. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@emmyfall2143 how was your response posted before the comment your responding too, wtf
No, she played it perfectly. She told the truth. Then she lied. But then she admitted that she was lying.
Where is the perjury? Which 1 is the lie? You sure you know? Prove it.
@@alcoholandfun243 one of them must be. She at least catches an a misdemeanor
@@biruss Yep, one of then is. But which 1? The one she admitted to lying about? The one she corrected herself on? Or the one to told after? 🤷♂️
@@alcoholandfun243 if 2 of them were under oath, it proves perjury happened
So for those who are confused, here’s the rundown:
The story starts with a carjacking/murder. The carjacker is caught quickly and the car found, but it turns out the victim was a lab tech transporting Caronavirus-SARS, the kind that had an outbreak in China, Canada and Singapore in the early 2000’s. It seems the doctor the lab tech works for was researching the disease.
It turns out a small outbreak of COVID is occurring directly related to the doctor’s research. He’s a known serial-adulterer who’d fathered a child with a reporter. Said reporter wanted to change the relationship, so he injected her with Coronavirus to kill her off. Instead it weakened her and killed their son.
The wife testified to appear vengeful and taint her testimony against him, knowing she was needed to make the case. With her corrupted testimony, her husband walked.
So that’s how the pandemic started! 😂 glad to know we finally have answers.
Calling it covid isnt totally wrong here bc it is a coronavirus but covid stands for coronavirus discovered. So here youd want to say covid-03.
The reason it's called covid not covid-19 or sars-cov-2 nowadays is bc its still an ongoing pandemic
@@annakepes8050 COVID doesn't stand for coronavirus discovered... It's coronavirus disease lmao
Yes. COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is a disease caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2
Why would the wife purposely throw the case so he could walk after humiliated her?
I guess it was an open relationship?
I’m sorry but that was genius! McCoy met his match and it wasn’t even another lawyer. lol
Props to the actress and writers of this episode,
It was dumb to admit it to the though
unfortunately for her she has no attorney-client privilege or privilege to privacy in this case and the prosecutors could very well re-try her for perjury and her husband on a mistrial.
@@ericthomas917 Admit what? That she lied the 1st time? The 2nd time? Or the 3rd time? She said she lied then corrected herself.
Which is the lie?
@@MrSpikethefirst not if they can't prove which was a lie
@@r.rodriguez4991 good point. perjury beats mirder though.
The Ending:
Because of her "performance", the jury finds the doctor "not guilty", with the more sinister element on top of that being that the wife slips her hand into her husband's, and they hold hands while walking out of the courtroom.
Actually one of my favorites because I'm a Law and Order (and pre-Stabler leaving on SVU) fan who likes it when the prosecution loses in a clever manner, or the right villain succeeds and gets away.
Oh, they still could've gotten her on perjury (even recanting doesn't get you out of that) and the husband on bringing a dangerous virus into the US and transporting it irresponsibly.
@@sonrouge but they didn’t…. So there’s that lol
That's evil. And they deserve each other. I feel bad for the son that died and his Mom, Eve though she shouldn't have been sleeping with a married man. She didn't deserve to lose her child. Sad. And that he got away with it, with the help of his wife?? Sickening. Wow....
her acting is amazing
How can someone kill their own child? The very person that gives you life is the one that takes it away. I can’t imagine. Same goes for the other way around
The no. 1 cause of death for pregnant women in America is murder at the hands of the father.
@@ellejagerman6105 Wrong. In fact, really really wrong. I did some digging around but even just a simple google search is enough to prove you wrong. You know the claim is sketchy when it goes against scientific consensus without a paper or study.
He was trying to kill the mistress . I’m not sure the son was the target
bruh there are cases of parents abusing and killing their own children everywhere....plus, @Elle Jagerman, you are most certainly, and utterly wrong.
Even when i watched the movie called the good son I still don't know if I would kill my own son even when he was the devil himself....
They could've gotten the wife for perjury (even if she recanted, she still perjured herself) and still could've gotten the husband for bringing SARS into the US and illegally and unsafely transporting it.
Also the mother of the dead son could sue for wrongful death
Why wasn’t he charged with the murder of the son and injecting the virus into both of them?
Bringing SARS into the US🙄 bet you still call it the Spanish flu
I dont think any of the DAs on this show would have went for the case(Even McCoy when he made it), though clearly they could have. Any actual time the wife would have gotten would have been negligible at best and in every other way but physically a spit in the face to the mother who lost her son at worse. Not to mention how much support the DA would lose amongst certain significant voter groups for either going after a wife for "supporting" her husband on the stand regardless of the reality of the case OR for "knowingly coercing" a false testimony from a "vulnerable witness" and then vindictively punishing her for her inability to hold "the lie" together and again all she would get is whatever she would get for pejury charge if anything at all. Just a lose/lose situation on top of a loss.
She created a catch-22 out of thin air. That takes skill
This is the first take-off of "Witness for the Prosecution" that does it justice. 👍to the writers and actress for carrying it off.
Now I have to watch the whole episode again. It’s hard to avoid watching an episode of Law and Order after the start credits begin, it also works the same for the clips.
I wish I could watch this whole episode now. This clip alone doesn’t make it easy to tell what exactly is going on.
I would consider subscribing to peacock if they didn’t still make you watch adds
I've never seen this episode, but it seems like this is a take on "Witness for the Prosecution" (A fantastic movie, btw.)
Yes!
Which was based on the short story by Agatha Christie.
I agree Marlene Dietrich and Charles Laughton were phenomenal
Mrs. Blanchard played them like a fiddle.
if its happening in the court room its already a circus.
I like her . She uses her Brains instead of emotions
These actors are quite good, the bit players who you don't see in any other shows really are really good actually.
New York has a big pool of experience stage actors to pick from.
@@toastnjam7384 ay that's true didn't even think about that
There’s many talented actors/musicians/artists who didn’t have the recognition or opportunity they needed.
I wonder why someone ends up famous over the others?
Ideas anyone?
Obsessed with this show, loved this segment presented here!
My counter would be "You think you've won? Have fun with your next STD test, not to mention splitting your husband's inheritance with his affair babies!"
A woman as smart and evil as her probably has her own ways to make sure neither of the options you gave could effect her.
@@user-qn9bx3jm5d nope. Inheritance law outmaneuvers her
How in the living hell do most of these lawyers not get punched
Do even longer ones next time
You can tell how old this is. Nobody's using a smartphone.
Y’all I know it’s bad but look at it that was a really smart move but it’s really messed up
I would have thought Serena would have warned Jack about the wife not being normal
Just realized this is the same actress who played the floaty/hippy Simone in Head of the Class back in the early nineties. She was Lady Macbeth / Witness for the Prosecution levels of excellence in this. Goes to show you how much untapped dramatic talent there often is in 'lighter' shows.
Khrystyne Haje
OMMFG!
Plot straight out of "Witness for the Prosecution" with Marlena Detrick!
Marlene Dietrich. (Hard name to spell.)
Um.... Agatha Christie actually...
@@meeraglides3485 WITH Marlene Dietrich. BY Agatha Christie. Or, more accurately, adapted from a play by Christie.
Fun fact: Dietrich means lockpick in german.
Oh i love Elizabeth Rohm
Me,too.😏
Amazing episode! I get it all… except- the wife knows about (likely) dozens of affairs- she may ‘wear the pants’ between the two of them- but why stay with such a prolific serial cheater? No amount of money could be worth it. The husband and wife must have some weird bond that transcends all that…
If you just want the money you could
I mean, like she said, it’s antiquated to get hung up on such things at a certain point with some people. She probably has flings too; but together they financially are far better off than any of the partners they keep. So why throw it away? Like she said, there are worse things than cheating.
She doesn’t believe in monogamy and they seem fine with polygamy.
Some people are okay with having an open relationship.
@@Clorgisclorg Yep nine certain she was cheating as well she just did it better
It was about way more than money. Standing, for example. And now she gets to watch him go rot, while she is seen as the tragic, wronged victim.
It’s brilliant.
LAW & ORDER will always be legend.
"Witness for the Prosecution", Law and Order style.
Truth is whatever deception sticks the best.
I love law and order
3:00 FACTS!!! She's speaking the truth. I never looked at it that way.
2:56 someone please tell me how to get your hair like that?
To the wifes credit, she DOES make a damningly technical superior point:
Murder and embezzelment FAR outclass the moral reprehesibility of faithless marriage actions.
Not to say the cutting-off of ALL emotional response to cheating is much better, because it isnt. Lacking response to it comes off as irreconcilably sociopathic
I kinda sorta admire this lady.
I've heard that attorneys who suggest that a witness lied on the stand usually lose their cases on appeal (appellate courts hate that sort of thing). This defense attorney probably had a better tactic than immediately accusing perjury, she just didn't take it.
She's good. She's really good. Why the hell does such a brilliant woman put up with such a scoundrel?
Money power im sure is a socialite she wasn't trying to give up the lifestyle.
The woman is a sociopath obviously
@horacehalt4216 Like Dune's Bene Gesserit Sisterhood. You let men think they are the ones with power while you carefully control them in the shadows. The wife probably wants him to think she will stick with him no matter what until the time comes when she sticks a knife into his back when he outlived his usefulness.
I love when McCoy loses
Did McCoy get her? I havent seen this episdo specifically but i know how it wouldve gone in the first few seasons.
Ben Stone would have thrown every book at her and then some to make her roll, even if it meant she might die in custody, just to get the truth from her.
Great actress!!
I’m pretty sure it’s still still illegal
Actually I don't mind they got off.... These two will always wonder when the other will kill them..... It's not like neither isn't capable..... If you deal with the devil... You better expect they will stab you in the back.....
6:44 Looks like she was singing a Swan song .LOL
At the DA's office, Mrs. Blanchard reveals her whole performance was an act calculated on the premise that it would be easier for the jury to believe a woman would lie to get back at her husband, than lie to protect him. McCoy sputters about perjury, but the ploy worked. The jury finds Dr. Blanchard not guilty on all counts. He and Mrs. Blanchard are seen holding hands as they walk out of the courtroom, and the episode ends.
Was anyone else waiting for her head to start doing 360s 😳
"He made her nauseous.'' You would think a medical professional would know the difference between nauseous and nauseated. I'll blame the writers.
Bastardization of language. Semantic change. It’s nauseating to hear people say “nauseous” all of the time.
Funny thing is that in reality there are people like this woman who pretty much lie their way into everything in life and their whole life is a lie.
Oh, but the husband who murdered his own son (in attempting to kill his mistress) is a-OK?
@@lenawagenfuehr53 Nice way to derail the topic of the issue at hand here. She's a pathological liar and is exactly no better than him. Both of them should be in prison equally. If you're defending her actions, then you're pretty much the same as she is which wouldn't surprise me a bit. Birds of the same feathers flock together.
This story is pretty much lifted from Agatha Christie’s Witness for the Prosecution.
Dammit she won
😅 she’s manipulating all of them 😅 yes she played you all for a mistral 😅she confused the entire court and acted broken and emotional just so her husband could’ve acquitted 😅
That's what you get if you don't have objectively verifiable evidence
Waiit. What's the ending?
He got off
@@thewrongshoes Apparently, with multiple women.
@@mikedupont3585 Hi Oh!
Their kid dying is their sin, shouldn't be a cheater.
I'm surprised that wife's head doesn't spin 360°.
God bless a loyal wife
What Are In Law & Order Opening Credits/Theme Music Used from 1990-1993 (Seasons 1-3) is?
Oh. "'" witness for the prosecution "'"
3:10 actually true
Sure....she suddenly is going to admit her anger in front of everyone.....after pretending
1.What Are In Law & Order: Criminal Intent Opening Credits/Theme Music Used from 2001-2007 (Seasons 1-6) is?
2.What Are In Law & Order: Criminal Intent Opening Credits/Theme Music Used from 2007-2011 (Seasons 7-10) is?
The theme from S1-S6 is the Criminal Intent theme song, specifically made for that show. The music used for S7-S10 was from Law and Order: Trial By Jury.
Its the director of music in a closet with tap shoes. He dropped it, and raised the pitch for the heel hitting the floor.
So, what exactly happened right after this video?
He gets off Scott free
Could someone put up full episodes please.
You have to buy those in sets of
whole seasons on video.
Try peacock sub. Trail then cancel before 14th day
Use putlocker
@@billmurray7473 Pirate.
bruh thats illegal lmao
Why are seasons 1-12 missing from peacock?
I'm confused...
Me 2.....Me 2
Which season and episode of law and order is from....
I'm so lost what happened here?
She pretended to be mixed up on the stand in order to create reasonable doubt with the jury.
Smartest woman I’ve ever scene
Oh wait she’s an amazing actress
Seen
They still could have got them locked up on other charges but ok
Anyone who cheats on their spouse is low.
RequItted? Requitted
This is why in good conscience I could not be a lawyer!!! Disgusting! Those kind of ppl will burn in hell....
Watch the Rowan Atkinson comedy skit 'A warm welcome'. Rowan Atkinson (portraying the Devil) placed lawyers in the same group as looters, pillages and thieves. Lol.
a Witness for the Prosecution
What happened in the end? We can't get law and order from where we come from
Bad couple won the case
They got away with murdering a kid. That's a hard pill to swallow.
Yeah, that was pretty much the end. Jury came back not guilty, and she walks out of the courtroom with her head held high, and a smile towards the DA table. It sucks, but a good episode none the less
That's sad
What country are YOU living in?
🇷🇺 or 🇨🇳?
McCoy is sweating at 8:45. Hot on the set or in the court room?
Diabolical!
I'd wish Doctor Bull would have gotten involved in these cases.
Does anyone know how this ended?
They (the husband and wife) got away with it.
What name has this blonde woman from the beginning? Im not sure but i think she played patrick jane shrink
Elisabeth Rohm. She was on Angel and Buffy before this
@@CommonSense8421 thank you 😘
They played them hard.
Elisabeth Rohm is blonde baddie most def
Nah not really. She has nothing in Angie Harmon (although a brunette) or Alana delagarza
Now that’s a wife
Hell naw lemme go watch this full episode full fuckin now cuz I need to know what happen after😭😭😭
9:31 Excuse me?
Odd episode..
So what just happened
Husband is a wealthy doctor poisoned his mistress with SARS, which lead to her infecting a dozen people including their child, who died.
He gives the SARS box to his assistant to get rid of, but in a stroke of bad luck she gets murdered in a carjacking gone wrong.
The SARS outbreak happens shortly afterwards and the police are able to connect the husband to the crime, but his wife says that he was with her the whole night he supposedly came over and poisoned his mistresses.
Wife is a stone-cold narcissist who doesn't care about the affairs or all the people he killed, only the comfortable lifestyle he provides for her, so she tells conflicting stories on the stand in order to confuse the jury and make her think she is mad at her husband for cheating on her and is trying to frame him in revenge, which means they find him not guilty.
Realistically McCoy could have just called for a mistrial and have her charged alongside her husband for perjury, obstruction and accessory after the fact. The defence lawyer would also be obligated to inform the judge that when the prosecution claims the wife just lied to protect her husband, they are telling the truth as she was present for her client gloating about it.
Mrs. Blanchard is a wimp. She should have packed up or kicked him out when she learned about the first affair.
She gets more money staying with him, the lifestyle she gets by staying with him versus leaving is different. I'm also guessing she has dirt on her husband in case he leaves her.
I think she was the beautiful redhead on Head of the Class.
I like her!
Wait, she admitted she perjured herself in front of 3 lawyers and then days prove it?
It's not a lie if you believe it
I actually agree with the doctor’s wife on a principle stance. Men show loyalty different to women. As long as a man remains married and socially monogamous (support, being a dad, financial, moral spiritual physical protection) , sexual infidelity with others isn’t a big deal. When a man starts spending resources and protection on the other woman, THEN it’s a problem
Ok
I forget how this ended
Hi Dow