@@thecrow6388you are telling the whole world how you don't know any history pertaining to this subject if you think the guys you listen to are genuine and truthful.
He uploaded a short form video titled "Muhammad hijab agrees the Quran is not preserved" and he took a few clips out of a video where brother Muhammad talks to a Hadith rejector and shows him that he has to accept that the Quran is changed if he reject the Hadith, of course he believes in the Hadith and therefore that’s his argument, this guy cutted it in a way that leaves all the context. They are very desperate Edit: fixed some typos
@@thaknobodi great to hear! I mean christians shouldn’t be ashamed of their people, true christians are righteous honest people, but these apoIogist (and their supporters) are everything but that. Sadly not much of true christians are left, elhamdulillah most of them became Muslim
The Complete Refutation of Christians who claim that the Black Stone is Idolitary: First, some background before the argument: Numbers 21:4-9 - 4 From Mount Hor, they set out by the way to the Red Sea, to go around the land of Edom. And the people became impatient on the way. 5 And the people spoke against God and against Moses, “Why have you brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? For there is no food and no water, and we loathe this worthless food.” 6 Then the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people so that many people of Israel died. 7 And the people came to Moses and said, “We have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord and against you. Pray to the Lord, that he take away the serpents from us.” So Moses prayed for the people. 8 And the Lord said to Moses, “Make a fiery serpent and set it on a pole, and everyone who is bitten, when he sees it, shall live.” 9 So Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on a pole. And if a serpent bit anyone, he would look at the bronze serpent and live. 2 Kings 18:4 - He removed the high places and broke the pillars and cut down the Asherah. And he broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the people of Israel had made offerings to it (the staff was named Nehushtan). Muslims do not bow to the black stone, nor do we prostrate to it, nor do we sacrifice to it because it is just a stone and doing so would be considered idolatrous. However, some Christians object to this and say that Islam is idolatrous for having the black stone, although we don’t treat it as a divine object, simply as a gift from God. But if you look into the bible, it will teach that according to the standards of these Christians, both Christianity and Judaism are idolatrous for having an idol named Nehushtan and sacrificing for it. Still, those Christians claim that it isn’t idolatry, so why do they call the black stone an idol when Muslims don’t pray or sacrifice to it? They can either say the black stone isn’t idolatry (the logical answer) or they can say that both Christianity and Islam are idolatrous.
There is an easier refutation. Their god is literally called a stone in the bible. It’s one of his titles. Yahweh is called a stone in the bible. Jesus is also called a stone in the bible. There is no Muslim that calls god a stone. Why are they called stones? They are named after the anointed bethel stone of Jacob in the OT. The Christian tradition knows this. That’s why they teach that Jesus is buried in a venerated rock. If a Christian makes these claims. He simply gave up on Christianity and has no logical arguments against Islam. They resort to these poor claims and ‘arguments’ that debunk their own position.
Christian are desperate hypocrite, there multiple verse where they pray & bow down towards Jerusalem yet they doesn't considered it worshiping Jerusalem
You forgot this bro Isaiah 6:7-8 He touched my lips with the burning coal and said, “This has touched your lips, and now your guilt is gone, and your sins are forgiven.” Then I heard the Lord say, “Whom shall I send? Who will be our messenger?” I answered, “I will go! Send me!”
@@redalert3727 It's a well-known fact that Christians completely lack objectivity and integrity. If something conforms to their baseless theories, then it must be true, but if it doesn't, they cast doubt on it.
@@RandomBananaSalad ikr. How come they can say something absurd like this? Sometimes I even found Christians using atheist arguments just to prove Islam is false. Like seriously. 🤣
the PAGAN dilemma 1: 1. prophet muhammed never existed 2. prophet muhammed was actually a christian the PAGAN dilemma 2: 1. prophet muhammed was a liar tricked by the devil 2. prophet muhammed said the bible is preserved the PAGAN dilemma 3: 1. prophet muhammed can't know about jesus because he came 600 years later 2. prophet moses can know about adam, noah, abraham, etc despite coming thousands of years later
I saw your comment before watching the video and i thought isn't saying brain rot is alot but yeah it's in fact an understatement, these Christians are making me lose brain cells in big quantities.
along with major projections..it's them pretty much feeling insecure about jesus not being a christian but a torah following non christian man and that's just concluded using their own bible but for them to make our prophet anything but a muslim they don't accept neither our saheeh hadith or even the Quran..any of these lame ideas from these people are coming from a place of insecurity..they feel insecure about their book not being in the language of jesus so they try their best(and failing big time) to make the Quran not in Arabic despite the Quran itself claims its in Arabic in 12 different verses..they feel insecure about their bible corruption so they trey to attack the Quran's preservation even though we see people memorise the whole book and im yet to see a single christian doing the same for his book..they claim the Quran is violant yet their book is much worse..i can go on and on..from now on every time u here an argument from them try to spot this pattern it's kind of funny.
@@GTari-ob6bj Jesus wasn't a Christian, you're correct. Why would the NT be in the language of Jesus ? he didn't write any of it, but even in your quran Jesus doesn't speak his own language so what's the problem ? About the perfect preservation, I can show you 2 different things from 2 different qurans but you'll make something up and try to make it look normal. Jesus was a kufr and committed shirk if he was a muslim
@@Ryan_Nath uhhh what? The word Muslim means "submitter", and also the qira'at is really complicated lol, it's not like any Muslim can explain it, farid has a video on that. And also what's that thing about "Jesus in ur Quran doesn't speak in his own language" ? And preservation doesn't have anything to do with qira'at just so u know, 7 modes have been recited by the prophet PBUH,
@@Hxzaifaaa Source : Sunnah nabi channel the false 😂 information Lemme ask you one thing Is there really a photo of Jesus and Mary inside the Kaaba? Even if there is one, it must be a painting, but what year was it made? Even if Jesus went to the Kaaba, it was because Jesus (Prophet Isa) probably carried out the Hajj, where the Hajj is the law of Prophet Abraham which was continuously prescribed to the Prophet and his people after Prophet Abraham up to Prophet Muhammad (but the method was changed) But even if you believe it, so what? Still, as a Muslim, I will not change my belief that Jesus was a prophet sent by Allah, like other prophets whom Allah sent to humans to teach monotheism (only Allah is one, only Allah is the only one who has the right to be worshipped.
@@HxzaifaaaJabir [ibn 'Abdullah], may Allah be pleased with him and his father, reports that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, ordered 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, during the days of the conquest of Mecca, when he was in Batha, enter the Kaaba and erase all the images, and the Prophet himself, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, did not enter there until all the images were erased. 📚See. "Sahih Abu Daoud" No. 4156. Sheikh al-Albani called the hadith “good authentic” Imam Bukhari also reported in his Sahih: When the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) saw the images in the Kaaba, he did not enter there until he ordered them to be erased. When he saw (images of Abraham and Ishmael carrying arrows of divination, he said: “May Allah curse them (that is, the Quraish)! By Allah, neither Abraham nor Ishmael practiced divination with arrows." 📚See. Bukhariy No. 3352.
Ibn `Abbas said, "Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, and Allah has told you that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) changed their scripture and distorted it, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain. Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!" [Bukhari 7363]
@@khaledzreiqat4232 These christian arguments are getting out of hand, what they fail to realize is > Qur'an says Muhammad salallahu alayhi wa sallam is prophesied in the Injeel and that it was revealed in the language of the people (Aramaic) > They claim he is not in their bible and that their earliest scriptures are in Greek Therefor literally by own admission saying that their bible is not the Injeel.
Aah the same Chris who said the Quran is not from the 7th century because it contains stories before the 7th century. I thought he couldnt exceed this dumbness. But he has proved me wrong.
@@thecrow6388 "recognized" those were empty and unsubstantiated accusations that polytheists hid behind because they knew it was the truth although they rejected it. instead of name-calling, why don't you acknowledge how stupid the argument is? chris said the qur'ān is NOT from the seventh century because it contains stories belonging to older periods. you said it's "easily possible that a book FROM the 7th century...". you're contradicting chris's own argument here.
@thecrow6388 I've already written the argument. Chris thinks because the Quran contains narratives of events before the 7th century the Quran is not from the 7th Century.
This British dude saying I think, I am gonna agree with his thinking by saying I think he is a madman. I think this is how far I am gonna go here, I think.
Is simply they know Islam cannot be stopped people are accepting Islam in mases since 9/11, in the moment they decided that god was killed by he’s creation to save them from himself that religion was destined to die . Until 300 years the ley man was not able to read the bible when the public started to have access to it started to decline they prefer people to be atheists than believing in Islam
1 Kings 22:22 ‘By what means?’ the Lord asked. ‘I will go out and be a deceiving spirit in the mouths of all his prophets,’ he said. ‘You will succeed in enticing him,’ said the Lord. ‘Go and do it.’
@@JamalAdam455 It still doesn't matter. Quran was always recited. It was compiled also in a written form, but certainly there were those amongst the prophet's companions that could read and write. They would write down the Quranic manuscripts. I know this probably isn't your intention, but there's a difference between the majority of the society being illiterate and everyone being illiterate.
Some of the nobles of the Arabs had the access to reading and writing but the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and A lot of the other arabs didnt have access to reading and writing.Hope that answers your question.
Reading into early Islamic history with the pre-supposition that Muhammad is a false prophet or that he didn’t exist feels billion times more problematic, confusing, and straight up nonsensical
even if we accused every Islamic source and scholars to be a bunch of liers we can still see in the Romans written complaining about Muhammad peace be upon him which proves that he definitely existed
Well...in his defence, he has learnt from the best fictional stories, which is the Bible !! Without telling tales, christianity fails....and the trinity is the biggest tale of them all !!!
Since the late 90s the idea of Islam being a part of Christianity was also promoted by the Christian fundamentalists and artist Jack Chick, in his 'ChickTracts" that are still popular among many Christians. And he made several against Islam as well as other religions. He also published a comic book called 'The Prophet' that claimed that Khadija was a Catholic as was her uncle and she was on a mission from the Church to help Muhammad (PBUH) to turn the Arabs into Christians. It sounds stupid I know, though in the story, as Muhammad (PBUH) grew in power he broke from the church and created Islam. And even though it's idiotic to believe such nonsense, many Christians still promote the Chick Tracts and the comic is still available for purchase on his website.
And the hilarious contrast between the christians’ ultra skepticism regarding early Islamic history which is the most well recorded early history of any religion and their complete approval of the validity of the gospels whose authors are unkown never fails to make me laugh
If we wish to be accurate to history here, the idea of Islam being a Christian heretical sect(Naaudhubillah) is pretty ancient. John of Damascus(who was contemporary to Umar ibn Abdul Aziz) advocated such theories as well and he is one of the most influential Christians in history. So yeah, those guys were giving terrible arguments since the very beginning.
@@ibrahimihsan2090 There were also early christian attempts to tinker with the Julian calendar to make important Islamic events synonymous with the Year of the Mark of the Beast
@@Quranhadith360 it almost like Allah is trying to tell us something , jews were known for corrupting and killing prohpets Then this guys come and tell us that "If someone is jewish he's pure" But jewish got aton of prophets and they always either kill them disbelieve in them or just mock them even thou those prophet did an insane miracles , moses litterly spread the sea and his people still disbelieve in him right after Mohamed PBUH came , he read 1 verse and people believed in him , people who believed in him didnt want him to do anything as soon as he read the words of Allah people believe in him , they got tortured mocked and all the bad things but they didnt give it up and on top of that they left their goods their famillies their friends for the sake of Allah , im litterly getting goosbumps writing that , Mohamed PBUH didnt need to split the moon or do any insane miracles for the people to believe in him But this guys come and say "if a prophet is not a jew he's a liar not a true prophet cause the jews who killed mocked and ignore all the teaching of prophets are pure btw hehe"
They keep being inconsistent as writers of their gospels, just like Mathew and Mark said Jesus prayed to God to take the cup away from him while John said Jesus said he would not pray to be saved because he was sent for the mission. The funny thing is all desciples were sleeping when he was praying. So I am wondering how the so called eyewitnesses like Matthew heard Jesus saying " take this cup away from me" while he was sleeping and probably having a wet dream during that moment. Lol!
Oh, some of them straight up believe Muhammad SAWW was (Naaudhubillah) the Anti-Christ and died in the year 666 CE😂. They've got plenty of horrible and illogical Anti-Islam theories.
These enemies and critics of Islam use the "reach for whatever you can find, throw it against the wall, and see what seems to stick" method. Mashallah, this video does a great job of showing how illogical their argument is. The first time I personally encountered this idiotic argument was when it was used by a British author Tom Holland. Like the clown in this video, Holland claimed that Makkah cannot be in the Hijaz, but is actually in Syria because fruits such as figs, and olives mentioned in the Quran cannot grow in Makkah. That's kind of like me saying that I don't actually live in the Northern part of the United States because I know what a pineapple is and I've eaten it before even though pineapples cannot grow where I live.
Wow, he's so smart! He's even smarter than Einstein and Newton. We should totally support him and help him get his theory published and reviewed by experts so he can win the Nobel Prize. 😂😂
The way he confidently argues for the myth of Judeo-Christian partnership. Why not one of them, why both? Jews consider Christians to be pagans, so he's living in bubble thinking that they are united in anyway. Both Judaism and Christianity are deviations of Islam - the message of all the Prophets so it's not a new religion
the Christian apologiests are a troll at this point if they apply the same standard and theories on there religion they will leave it without looking back
The quran talks about instances like in Surah Tahrim or Surah Hujurat, where it talks about a Prophet, and in Surah Fath it says "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah (present tense)". If the quran is not revealed to prophet Muhammad ﷺ , then what are these verses talking about? The Quran itself debunks this Absurd theory lol
- في سورة الأحزاب، قال تعالى: (ما كان محمد أبا أحد من رجالكم ولكن رسول الله وخاتم النبيين) [الأحزاب:40]. this surah debunks you stating that the prophet Muhammad is the final prophet@@gavinjames1145
Muḥammad is not the father of any of your men,1 but is the Messenger of Allah and the seal of the prophets. And Allah has ˹perfect˺ knowledge of all things./this is the same surah I gived it to you in Arabic@@gavinjames1145
@@gavinjames1145 i am talking about 48:29 not 53:5-18. The verses of Surah Najm that you quoted, 53:5-18, they talk about a specific incident that happened in the past. These verses talk about how Muhammadﷺ saw the angel Gabriel. You are ignorant
﴿وَما يَتَّبِعُ أَكثَرُهُم إِلّا ظَنًّا إِنَّ الظَّنَّ لا يُغني مِنَ الحَقِّ شَيئًا إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَليمٌ بِما يَفعَلونَ﴾ [يونس: ٣٦] And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allāh is Knowing of what they do. Yunus : 36
Heres a theory; Jesus cried for being saved from being crucified(Hebrews 5:7). He didn’t want to die. He didn’t want to die for you. He didn’t want to die for your sins. He doesn’t love u. 😂even this makes sense unlike the BS they post.
This is the result of the trinity. Their claims only prove how insecure they are about their religion and bible. They can’t defend it. They try to keep the attention away by attacking ‘Islam’ with these absurd claims. Farid really exposed him. In his argument he claimed that the prophet only heard these stories. You caught him with his theory of heretical Christians who are familiar with Christian scripture. He will make another diversion video. That’s all he does. He never engages with the arguments. Always trying to twist for his audience.
@@Vergil-X1look at the most major anti Islam guys Sam Shamoun, Chris, Bob the Builder, DumbLogic, that black shaking brother and his weird white “girlfriend” he’s always with, Hatun etc etc etc 🤷🏾♂️😂
Premise 1: The Qur'an describes the Injeel as the revelation given directly to Jesus. Premise 2: Christians refer to the Bible, particularly the Gospels, as accounts of Jesus' ministry written by various, often anonymous authors. Conclusion: Therefore, by definition, they are not referring to the same things. "The Qur'anic Dilemma" - lol
What if christian are right? They always claim Jesus and Isa a.v is not the same person, the Yashua from the bible and the Quran is a different persons! What if chrisitians are RIGHT?!? Think! To show how sinless Jesus is, they denigrate and humiliate all other previous prophets and messengers! To turn Jesus like a god being in human form! But who can so misguide humanity? Who needs to away people from God? the bible shows us prophets in very bad shape, and this book tries to tell me how even God can make mistakes? How is too easy that prophets and messengers can be deceived as easily? Think about it! Limiting God, make him human, denigrate and humiliate all other prophets and messengers...
The reality is that Christian Apologists cannot defend pagan beliefs like the Trinity or the Eternal sin. Neither can they defend the corruption in the Bible or why their lifestyles cannot match the lifestyle of Jesus (AS). Now they make ridiculous arguments to justify their futile beliefs. Ask them if Mary was a human being. Do they really believe a human being can give birth to a God.
These people Allah has sealed their hearts, even when all evidence leads to the truth of Islam they create these fantastical theories and conspiracies.
At 2:57...Chris just said that there were ROCK INSCRIPTIONS in Mecca that proved the people of MECCA were not literate. WAIT!! 🔍🤔 Did CHRIS just admit that there was a place called MECCA 😲
As selam aleykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. I highly recommend people watch the "intellectual Seerah" Playlist by Sapience institute, where they go over these topics of "did X and Y exist". It's also interesting that he mentions the vegetation part. The famous orientalist Patricia Crone also once asked that why should the Quran mention vegetation outside of Arabia. And these people don't even know that they are actually advocating for Islam and not against it, because this only reinforces the purpose of the Quran being a message to all mankind, where they can draw parallels to vegetation existing in their own places.
JazakAllah. Please make a video about how the Quran distinguishes between the what was revealed to the Prophets and what "is in between their (Jews/Christians) hands"
I suggest people to really look into genuine academia and scholarly works recarding the Quran, Hadiths etc. Because you Will Be suprised on how much of the majority of modernday academia agrees with the traditional Islamic narratives about general things.
I am not sure how to start this comment. Anyone who understands Arabic and reads the Quran will know immediately that it is not of a human origin. I guess a lot of these people, read the Quran in English and they approach it like their texts. This will cause these doubts.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Brother do you have a video about authenticity of nahj al-balagha or could you make one? Or would you recommend any piece of writing that proves it's not authentic/reliable? جزاک الله خیرا
@@FaridResponds May Allah bless you brother. Could you provide the same thing about Kitab al-Kafi and bihar al anwar? I have a shia friend who now doubts his beliefs and wants to know what the truth is. It would be great if you could advise me on how I can help him. جزاک الله خیرا
Salam ya Fraid. I just learned that Zaid ibn Thabit learned Hebrew in order to know how to read the Torah as ordered by the Prophet SAW. Immediately a doubt came into my mind that the hebrew words in the Quran you mentioned like "Fathahikat" in the case of "she laughed" could have been learned from him? Also could not stories of the Torah be learned if Zaid could read the Torah? Clear this doubt please. JazakAllahu khair.
@@FaridResponds Oh I see, alright then! Thank you! On the second point, so no one accused the Prophet SAW of learning stories of the Prophets from Zaid RA?
Salam Wa Rahmatullah Akhi May Allah reward you. I have a question: Is the Hadith of Yajuj and Majuj digging at the wall and saying “We are going to finnish this tomorrow In Shaa Allah” authentic?
What for? Farid doesn’t need to dialogue with a deluded, lying pathetic fellow who doesn’t know what logic is and has not read any classical works on Islam in its original language. Nothing to dialogue about.
Farid. Brother I seek advice. I hope we get on a chat. I was following ahlus-sunnah, then became Shia, then returned to ahlus-sunnah. I only seek advice.
Did Farid really just raise a strawman? Chris says the Quran talks about geography that does not match Mecca. Farid says, Did Muhammad have access to information he shouldn’t have? What?!
this is a core reason why orientalists say what they say. And Quran never say mecca is full of gardens. Infact when Quran talks about Abraham leaving Ishmael there, Abraham remarked that it was a valley of no cultivation. He even made dua that they maybe provided with fruits. And today mecca as we know is not suitable for cultivation but fruits from everywhere is transported there. Would it not be more effective to talk about the greatly sought rain and gardens to desert dwellers than not? In any case I know and memorized every verse of Quran and I know what I am talking about. You don't and neither do your scholars.
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku You do realize that evidence of Mecca existing before 6th century seems to be all but lost and nothing exists to prove it was a trade center as claimed. Neighbouring cities have evidence, but they too have none of Mecca, even though it is close by. That is why the claims in Quran are doubtful.
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku I did not say biggest trade center or that it was in Quran. But what is in Quran is that it is the Mother of Cities. No archaeological evidence of this being oldest city on earth is there to be found anywhere. The footnote you see there also affirms it is the oldest place of worship. S6:92 This is a blessed Book which We have revealed-confirming what came before it-so you may warn the Mother of Cities1 and everyone around it. Those who believe in the Hereafter ˹truly˺ believe in it and guard their prayers.
FARID PLEASE READ!!! so i read imam shafii said that aishia was prepubescent when they consummated their marriage, and so far no one refuted that based on my research.. how can i explain this to a kuffar?
I don't know where you read Imam Shafii saying that, as far as i know, in the Shafii School and Hanbali School, a woman is considered pre pubescent if she is below 15 and no sign of puberty occurs. We know that Muhammad ﷺ consummated the marriage at 9, so if Aisha R.A was not physically mature at 9, why did the Prophet ﷺ wait for 3 years? It makes no sense.
@@carbonic9115 >>> We know that Muhammad ﷺ consummated the marriage at 9, so if Aisha R.A was not physically mature at 9, why did the Prophet ﷺ wait for 3 years? =========================== I don't buy it. Aisha was NOT a traumatized woman. She was a woman leader and had her voices heard by her people. She was one of the important figure. She didn't come across as someone who was forced to marry as a little girl. Moreover, not a single enemy of the Prophet ever used his marriage to Aishah as the reason to discredit him. Most of the narratives printed in the books of hadith are reported only by Hisham ibn `Urwah, who was reporting on the authority of his father. First of all, more people than just one, two or three should logically have reported. It is strange that no one from Medina, where Hisham ibn `Urwah lived the first 71 years of his life narrated the event, despite the fact that his Medinan pupils included the well-respected Malik ibn Anas. The origins of the report of the narratives of this event are people from Iraq, where Hisham is reported to have shifted after living in Medina for most of his life. There are hadiths that put her age as 19 years old when she married the Prophet. So there is a contradiction. The narrative of the marriage of nine-year-old Aisha by Hisham ibn `Urwah cannot be held true when it is contradicted by many other reported narratives.
The IQ keeps plummeting….😂
Exactly 😅
@@thecrow6388
Talking about the accusations made by the enemies of Islam.
@@thecrow6388
The conclusions are none sensical. How could the Prophet, upon him be peace, be a Christian? The Qur'an specifically speaks against it.
@@thecrow6388 He has videos that refute stupid claims like the prophet didn't exist
@@thecrow6388you are telling the whole world how you don't know any history pertaining to this subject if you think the guys you listen to are genuine and truthful.
These crazy theories just show how desperate they are. You can even see how he behaves in speakers corner, Islam really lives in their head 24/7
He uploaded a short form video titled "Muhammad hijab agrees the Quran is not preserved" and he took a few clips out of a video where brother Muhammad talks to a Hadith rejector and shows him that he has to accept that the Quran is changed if he reject the Hadith, of course he believes in the Hadith and therefore that’s his argument, this guy cutted it in a way that leaves all the context. They are very desperate
Edit: fixed some typos
@@TheOneAndOnlyJinglebii was ashamed of my own people when i was a christian.
@@thaknobodi you reverted? Elhamdulillah
@@TheOneAndOnlyJinglebi yes alhamdulillah, in 2011.
@@thaknobodi great to hear! I mean christians shouldn’t be ashamed of their people, true christians are righteous honest people, but these apoIogist (and their supporters) are everything but that. Sadly not much of true christians are left, elhamdulillah most of them became Muslim
The Complete Refutation of Christians who claim that the Black Stone is Idolitary:
First, some background before the argument:
Numbers 21:4-9 - 4 From Mount Hor, they set out by the way to the Red Sea, to go around the land of Edom. And the people became impatient on the way. 5 And the people spoke against God and against Moses, “Why have you brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? For there is no food and no water, and we loathe this worthless food.” 6 Then the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people so that many people of Israel died. 7 And the people came to Moses and said, “We have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord and against you. Pray to the Lord, that he take away the serpents from us.” So Moses prayed for the people. 8 And the Lord said to Moses, “Make a fiery serpent and set it on a pole, and everyone who is bitten, when he sees it, shall live.” 9 So Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on a pole. And if a serpent bit anyone, he would look at the bronze serpent and live.
2 Kings 18:4 - He removed the high places and broke the pillars and cut down the Asherah. And he broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the people of Israel had made offerings to it (the staff was named Nehushtan).
Muslims do not bow to the black stone, nor do we prostrate to it, nor do we sacrifice to it because it is just a stone and doing so would be considered idolatrous. However, some Christians object to this and say that Islam is idolatrous for having the black stone, although we don’t treat it as a divine object, simply as a gift from God. But if you look into the bible, it will teach that according to the standards of these Christians, both Christianity and Judaism are idolatrous for having an idol named Nehushtan and sacrificing for it. Still, those Christians claim that it isn’t idolatry, so why do they call the black stone an idol when Muslims don’t pray or sacrifice to it? They can either say the black stone isn’t idolatry (the logical answer) or they can say that both Christianity and Islam are idolatrous.
There is an easier refutation.
Their god is literally called a stone in the bible.
It’s one of his titles. Yahweh is called a stone in the bible.
Jesus is also called a stone in the bible. There is no Muslim that calls god a stone.
Why are they called stones?
They are named after the anointed bethel stone of Jacob in the OT.
The Christian tradition knows this. That’s why they teach that Jesus is buried in a venerated rock.
If a Christian makes these claims. He simply gave up on Christianity and has no logical arguments against Islam. They resort to these poor claims and ‘arguments’ that debunk their own position.
Praying towards something isnt all that strange since most jews generally pray towards jerusalem
@@Gabriel-ServantOfGodMay Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala guide you.
Christian are desperate hypocrite, there multiple verse where they pray & bow down towards Jerusalem yet they doesn't considered it worshiping Jerusalem
You forgot this bro Isaiah 6:7-8
He touched my lips with the burning coal and said, “This has touched your lips, and now your guilt is gone, and your sins are forgiven.” Then I heard the Lord say, “Whom shall I send? Who will be our messenger?” I answered, “I will go! Send me!”
They can’t refute the Prophet so they want him on their side 😂
🤣
🥶🥶🥶
I love how they posit these theories without a shred of evidence. When it comes to early Islamic scholarship, everything can be tossed out it seems.
But the same people make a fuss about multiple wives and so on. Do they accept the Islamic tradition or not?
@@redalert3727 It's a well-known fact that Christians completely lack objectivity and integrity. If something conforms to their baseless theories, then it must be true, but if it doesn't, they cast doubt on it.
Its a last resort, like muhammad pbuh never existed or something like that.
@@redalert3727
Their logic:
Having 4 wives: 😡
Having 20 girlfriends: 🥰
@@RandomBananaSalad ikr. How come they can say something absurd like this? Sometimes I even found Christians using atheist arguments just to prove Islam is false. Like seriously. 🤣
the PAGAN dilemma 1:
1. prophet muhammed never existed
2. prophet muhammed was actually a christian
the PAGAN dilemma 2:
1. prophet muhammed was a liar tricked by the devil
2. prophet muhammed said the bible is preserved
the PAGAN dilemma 3:
1. prophet muhammed can't know about jesus because he came 600 years later
2. prophet moses can know about adam, noah, abraham, etc despite coming thousands of years later
Exactly.
This is the definition of brain rot.
I saw your comment before watching the video and i thought isn't saying brain rot is alot but yeah it's in fact an understatement, these Christians are making me lose brain cells in big quantities.
I think he knows he is deliberately telling lies but does it anyways because he is blinded by hate.
@@عبدالرحمنمحمد-ت4خ4و Christians have a severe lack of objectivity and integrity.
@@unknown.1043 100%
this is the result of shirk and kufr. May Allah protect us
along with major projections..it's them pretty much feeling insecure about jesus not being a christian but a torah following non christian man and that's just concluded using their own bible but for them to make our prophet anything but a muslim they don't accept neither our saheeh hadith or even the Quran..any of these lame ideas from these people are coming from a place of insecurity..they feel insecure about their book not being in the language of jesus so they try their best(and failing big time) to make the Quran not in Arabic despite the Quran itself claims its in Arabic in 12 different verses..they feel insecure about their bible corruption so they trey to attack the Quran's preservation even though we see people memorise the whole book and im yet to see a single christian doing the same for his book..they claim the Quran is violant yet their book is much worse..i can go on and on..from now on every time u here an argument from them try to spot this pattern it's kind of funny.
@@GTari-ob6bj Jesus wasn't a Christian, you're correct. Why would the NT be in the language of Jesus ? he didn't write any of it, but even in your quran Jesus doesn't speak his own language so what's the problem ? About the perfect preservation, I can show you 2 different things from 2 different qurans but you'll make something up and try to make it look normal. Jesus was a kufr and committed shirk if he was a muslim
@@Ryan_Nath uhhh what? The word Muslim means "submitter", and also the qira'at is really complicated lol, it's not like any Muslim can explain it, farid has a video on that.
And also what's that thing about "Jesus in ur Quran doesn't speak in his own language" ?
And preservation doesn't have anything to do with qira'at just so u know, 7 modes have been recited by the prophet PBUH,
If Mohammed was a Christian, then he would have loved the Idol worship and added a statue of Jesus to the rest that was around the Kaaba.
@@Hxzaifaaa
Source : Sunnah nabi channel the false 😂 information
Lemme ask you one thing
Is there really a photo of Jesus and Mary inside the Kaaba?
Even if there is one, it must be a painting, but what year was it made?
Even if Jesus went to the Kaaba, it was because Jesus (Prophet Isa) probably carried out the Hajj, where the Hajj is the law of Prophet Abraham which was continuously prescribed to the Prophet and his people after Prophet Abraham up to Prophet Muhammad (but the method was changed)
But even if you believe it, so what? Still, as a Muslim, I will not change my belief that Jesus was a prophet sent by Allah, like other prophets whom Allah sent to humans to teach monotheism (only Allah is one, only Allah is the only one who has the right to be worshipped.
If Jesus was a muslim he should of been killed, he committed shirk and everything
@@Hxzaifaaa just runaway ,if you can't answer this because it is a hoax about picture of Jesus and Mary in the kaabah 😂
@@m.c.rabbit7257 It's a weak hadith sorry, and that wasnt what I was saying. I was talking about before Mecca was taken back
@@HxzaifaaaJabir [ibn 'Abdullah], may Allah be pleased with him and his father, reports that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, ordered 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, during the days of the conquest of Mecca, when he was in Batha, enter the Kaaba and erase all the images, and the Prophet himself, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, did not enter there until all the images were erased.
📚See. "Sahih Abu Daoud" No. 4156. Sheikh al-Albani called the hadith “good authentic”
Imam Bukhari also reported in his Sahih:
When the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) saw the images in the Kaaba, he did not enter there until he ordered them to be erased. When he saw (images of Abraham and Ishmael carrying arrows of divination, he said: “May Allah curse them (that is, the Quraish)! By Allah, neither Abraham nor Ishmael practiced divination with arrows."
📚See. Bukhariy No. 3352.
Ibn `Abbas said, "Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Qur'an) which has been revealed to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, and Allah has told you that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) changed their scripture and distorted it, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain. Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!"
[Bukhari 7363]
I met a guy who straight up denied it and said that Ibn Abbas is not the prophet salallahu 'alayhi wa sallam.
@@Zual-Kifl bruh. Copium
@@khaledzreiqat4232 These christian arguments are getting out of hand, what they fail to realize is
> Qur'an says Muhammad salallahu alayhi wa sallam is prophesied in the Injeel and that it was revealed in the language of the people (Aramaic)
> They claim he is not in their bible and that their earliest scriptures are in Greek
Therefor literally by own admission saying that their bible is not the Injeel.
@@Zual-Kifl Injeel is the Gospel not the Bible. Please pleas please engage in an honest discussion.
"the Quran could've been revealed on the moon because it talks about the moon"
Aah the same Chris who said the Quran is not from the 7th century because it contains stories before the 7th century. I thought he couldnt exceed this dumbness. But he has proved me wrong.
@@abutalsafuba2179 they have a huge problem accepting the obvious so they resort to the stupidest work-arounds just so they don't have to convert 😢
@@thecrow6388 "recognized" those were empty and unsubstantiated accusations that polytheists hid behind because they knew it was the truth although they rejected it. instead of name-calling, why don't you acknowledge how stupid the argument is? chris said the qur'ān is NOT from the seventh century because it contains stories belonging to older periods. you said it's "easily possible that a book FROM the 7th century...". you're contradicting chris's own argument here.
@thecrow6388 So you've just repeated what i said in more words than necessary and you think I'm dumb. Are you Chris?
@thecrow6388 My man thinks that Mel Gibson's movie Passion of the Christ was made 2000 years ago because its a 2000 year old story.
@thecrow6388 I've already written the argument. Chris thinks because the Quran contains narratives of events before the 7th century the Quran is not from the 7th Century.
His brain keeps melting.
@@thecrow6388 my comment is directed to the Christian.
@@thecrow6388 because…?
@@thecrow6388 because…?
@@thecrow6388 such as? Incl. timestamps so we both know you actually watched the video.
Free palestine.
Amin. And free the ummah from lack of salah, consumption of haram, and adoption of misguided cultural norms or overzealousness.
Free yourself from Ta'asub
@@rathernot6660 May Allaah aid the suffering Muslims and free the Muslim lands from the tyrannical disbelievers
This British dude saying I think, I am gonna agree with his thinking by saying I think he is a madman. I think this is how far I am gonna go here, I think.
No
The question is how they can lie, is there not anyone watching this guy?
Is simply they know Islam cannot be stopped people are accepting Islam in mases since 9/11, in the moment they decided that god was killed by he’s creation to save them from himself that religion was destined to die . Until 300 years the ley man was not able to read the bible when the public started to have access to it started to decline they prefer people to be atheists than believing in Islam
Katt Williams voice....don't you know I can see you
1 Kings 22:22
‘By what means?’ the Lord asked.
‘I will go out and be a deceiving spirit in the mouths of all his prophets,’ he said.
‘You will succeed in enticing him,’ said the Lord. ‘Go and do it.’
@voyega what exactly are we supposed to do?
@@omw-1425 expose their lies.
He’s basically regurgitating a hodgepodge of cherry picked theories from modern day orientalists
"Makkah was not literate according to rock inscriptions"
Then how did they write the rock inscriptions???
that's true but most of them weren't that educated
@@JamalAdam455 It still doesn't matter. Quran was always recited. It was compiled also in a written form, but certainly there were those amongst the prophet's companions that could read and write. They would write down the Quranic manuscripts. I know this probably isn't your intention, but there's a difference between the majority of the society being illiterate and everyone being illiterate.
@@wakannnai1 I'm a Muslim and that was what I was trying to show thank you for the clarification
Some of the nobles of the Arabs had the access to reading and writing but the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and A lot of the other arabs didnt have access to reading and writing.Hope that answers your question.
@@wakannnai1 the prophet 2 wives i believed could write and read
Reading into early Islamic history with the pre-supposition that Muhammad is a false prophet or that he didn’t exist feels billion times more problematic, confusing, and straight up nonsensical
even if we accused every Islamic source and scholars to be a bunch of liers we can still see in the Romans written complaining about Muhammad peace be upon him which proves that he definitely existed
The strangest conspiracy theories my god
man, this guy makes some great fictional stories,maybe he should write for marvel, that way marvel will go bankrupt faster 😂😂😂
Well...in his defence, he has learnt from the best fictional stories, which is the Bible !!
Without telling tales, christianity fails....and the trinity is the biggest tale of them all !!!
Chris has always had absolutely trash arguments that ALWAYS GET DESTROYED
I swear by Allah these Christian missionaries are walking memes.
Since the late 90s the idea of Islam being a part of Christianity was also promoted by the Christian fundamentalists and artist Jack Chick, in his 'ChickTracts" that are still popular among many Christians. And he made several against Islam as well as other religions. He also published a comic book called 'The Prophet' that claimed that Khadija was a Catholic as was her uncle and she was on a mission from the Church to help Muhammad (PBUH) to turn the Arabs into Christians. It sounds stupid I know, though in the story, as Muhammad (PBUH) grew in power he broke from the church and created Islam. And even though it's idiotic to believe such nonsense, many Christians still promote the Chick Tracts and the comic is still available for purchase on his website.
The miles these Christians cross just to not believe the evident truth..it’s not an issue of knowledge but an issue of the heart
And the hilarious contrast between the christians’ ultra skepticism regarding early Islamic history which is the most well recorded early history of any religion and their complete approval of the validity of the gospels whose authors are unkown never fails to make me laugh
If we wish to be accurate to history here, the idea of Islam being a Christian heretical sect(Naaudhubillah) is pretty ancient.
John of Damascus(who was contemporary to Umar ibn Abdul Aziz) advocated such theories as well and he is one of the most influential Christians in history.
So yeah, those guys were giving terrible arguments since the very beginning.
@@ibrahimihsan2090 There were also early christian attempts to tinker with the Julian calendar to make important Islamic events synonymous with the Year of the Mark of the Beast
@@TheOudBear Yeah, pretty messed up.
Mohamed PBUH was not a jew therefor he cant be prohphet . Best argument ever
Prophet and gods can only be jews according to this guy
Yeah . Those Crosstians!!
For them Abraham Noah Job Jonah etc were J e w s.
@@Quranhadith360 it almost like Allah is trying to tell us something , jews were known for corrupting and killing prohpets
Then this guys come and tell us that "If someone is jewish he's pure"
But jewish got aton of prophets and they always either kill them disbelieve in them or just mock them even thou those prophet did an insane miracles , moses litterly spread the sea and his people still disbelieve in him right after
Mohamed PBUH came , he read 1 verse and people believed in him , people who believed in him didnt want him to do anything as soon as he read the words of Allah people believe in him , they got tortured mocked and all the bad things but they didnt give it up and on top of that they left their goods their famillies their friends for the sake of Allah , im litterly getting goosbumps writing that , Mohamed PBUH didnt need to split the moon or do any insane miracles for the people to believe in him
But this guys come and say
"if a prophet is not a jew he's a liar not a true prophet cause the jews who killed mocked and ignore all the teaching of prophets are pure btw hehe"
They employ hyper-skepticism when it comes to Islam, but they're fine with ANONYMOUS authors for their bible!
Oh Chris is having life support with this level of desperation 😭😭😭
They keep being inconsistent as writers of their gospels, just like Mathew and Mark said Jesus prayed to God to take the cup away from him while John said Jesus said he would not pray to be saved because he was sent for the mission. The funny thing is all desciples were sleeping when he was praying. So I am wondering how the so called eyewitnesses like Matthew heard Jesus saying " take this cup away from me" while he was sleeping and probably having a wet dream during that moment. Lol!
When they are out of arguments against Islam, they start to invent their own history.
Bro... i can't. How do you have the patience to watch these people
May Allah increase us in fiqh and following of the Sunnah
Can we talk about how Chris looks like Chris from family guy😂
It's like they asked chat gpt for the most farfetched conspiracy theory they could. I can even listen to that guy lmao
They do this deliberatly because we say Jesus is a Muslim..tit for tat
Muhammad was a christian?! Whats next? He was an apostle of Jesus?😂😂
they can't defend there dying religion so they attack other religions especially Islam
It's a funny as Jesus being a muslim! What's next? Was he married to a child ?😂😂
Blud doesn't even understand what we mean by a Muslim and actually Jesus condoned marrying at the age of 3 years old
@@Ryan_Nath It's as funny as Muhammad (PBUH) being a Catholic! What's next? Is Yahweh going to take more virgins for himself? 😂😂😂
Oh, some of them straight up believe Muhammad SAWW was (Naaudhubillah) the Anti-Christ and died in the year 666 CE😂.
They've got plenty of horrible and illogical Anti-Islam theories.
These enemies and critics of Islam use the "reach for whatever you can find, throw it against the wall, and see what seems to stick" method. Mashallah, this video does a great job of showing how illogical their argument is. The first time I personally encountered this idiotic argument was when it was used by a British author Tom Holland. Like the clown in this video, Holland claimed that Makkah cannot be in the Hijaz, but is actually in Syria because fruits such as figs, and olives mentioned in the Quran cannot grow in Makkah. That's kind of like me saying that I don't actually live in the Northern part of the United States because I know what a pineapple is and I've eaten it before even though pineapples cannot grow where I live.
Common Farid W
Chris really is quite desperate. It must be hard for him seeing Christian hegemony slipping away.
Watch him react to this vedio and double down on his words and act smart 😂😂
Ya Allah. 🤦♂️ This has to be the peak of ja-hi-li-yyah.
I'm a simple man, i see farid, i click
Wow, he's so smart! He's even smarter than Einstein and Newton. We should totally support him and help him get his theory published and reviewed by experts so he can win the Nobel Prize. 😂😂
why Ibn Hazm specifically there are many before Ibn Hazm speaking about Tahrif in the Bible and Torah
The way he confidently argues for the myth of Judeo-Christian partnership. Why not one of them, why both? Jews consider Christians to be pagans, so he's living in bubble thinking that they are united in anyway. Both Judaism and Christianity are deviations of Islam - the message of all the Prophets so it's not a new religion
Christians who makes these arguments.
They are simply paid by Zionists.
Anyone that says Judeo Christian is under this ideology.
Bro someone literally said Paul is a Prophet in Islam and if you reject Paul you are not a Muslim 😂
they are so incompetent on that topic 😂 they say that ibn kathir himself said this when thats simoly not true
There is no recognition by Quran.
the Christian apologiests are a troll at this point if they apply the same standard and theories on there religion they will leave it without looking back
@@JamalAdam455 literally 😂 Paul is a fake prophet even according to biblical criteria for prophethood.
@@mrsaluytPaul isn't considered a prophet in Christianity he's an Apostle lol 😅
The quran talks about instances like in Surah Tahrim or Surah Hujurat, where it talks about a Prophet, and in Surah Fath it says "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah (present tense)". If the quran is not revealed to prophet Muhammad ﷺ , then what are these verses talking about? The Quran itself debunks this Absurd theory lol
Qur'an 53:5-18 tells of Muhammad in the _past tense_ . This suggests that this part of the Qur'an was written after the time of Muhammad.
@@gavinjames1145you guys are crazy
- في سورة الأحزاب، قال تعالى: (ما كان محمد أبا أحد من رجالكم ولكن رسول الله وخاتم النبيين) [الأحزاب:40]. this surah debunks you stating that the prophet Muhammad is the final prophet@@gavinjames1145
Muḥammad is not the father of any of your men,1 but is the Messenger of Allah and the seal of the prophets. And Allah has ˹perfect˺ knowledge of all things./this is the same surah I gived it to you in Arabic@@gavinjames1145
@@gavinjames1145 i am talking about 48:29 not 53:5-18. The verses of Surah Najm that you quoted, 53:5-18, they talk about a specific incident that happened in the past. These verses talk about how Muhammadﷺ saw the angel Gabriel. You are ignorant
Ibn al Qayyim said that from the signs of Prophethood is, that the intelligent and scholars ridicule and laugh at the arguments of its enemies
He sounds like he's talking about karsinian mass conversion
﴿وَما يَتَّبِعُ أَكثَرُهُم إِلّا ظَنًّا إِنَّ الظَّنَّ لا يُغني مِنَ الحَقِّ شَيئًا إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَليمٌ بِما يَفعَلونَ﴾ [يونس: ٣٦]
And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allāh is Knowing of what they do.
Yunus : 36
Heres a theory;
Jesus cried for being saved from being crucified(Hebrews 5:7).
He didn’t want to die.
He didn’t want to die for you.
He didn’t want to die for your sins.
He doesn’t love u.
😂even this makes sense unlike the BS they post.
May ALLAH bless you akhi
Akhi I had a question where can I ask you?
سألتني Ask me
This is the result of the trinity.
Their claims only prove how insecure they are about their religion and bible. They can’t defend it. They try to keep the attention away by attacking ‘Islam’ with these absurd claims.
Farid really exposed him.
In his argument he claimed that the prophet only heard these stories. You caught him with his theory of heretical Christians who are familiar with Christian scripture.
He will make another diversion video. That’s all he does. He never engages with the arguments. Always trying to twist for his audience.
Finally someone responded to that dumber
Always know it's gonna end with a bang when the video cuts to black but doesn't end hh.
Remember most of these anti Islam missionaries that waste their time “refuting Islam” are not even married 😂
They are upset at Rasoolullah Sallalahu Alayhi Wasalam having wives because they are gay lol
How do you work that one out? 🤔
@@Vergil-X1look at the most major anti Islam guys Sam Shamoun, Chris, Bob the Builder, DumbLogic, that black shaking brother and his weird white “girlfriend” he’s always with, Hatun etc etc etc 🤷🏾♂️😂
@@MohamedShou
waste their time ❌
waste their time in Duniya with it the Akhirah ✅
“There is more historical evidence of the existence of prophet Mohammed PBUH than any man in history”
Chris 🤡: “allow me to introduce myself”
The thumbnail quote made me shake my head.
Farid is a name common in Bangladesh.
Farid is Bangladeshi.
;3
It does not matter.
He is a Muslim.
Fallacious reasoning!!!1111!1!1!1!!1!1!1!1!1!1
😂 now they are just scrapping bottom of the barrel as they have nothing solid against Islam
Quran confirms the Bible,
Which bible: 66, 73, 76, 81?
Premise 1: The Qur'an describes the Injeel as the revelation given directly to Jesus.
Premise 2: Christians refer to the Bible, particularly the Gospels, as accounts of Jesus' ministry written by various, often anonymous authors.
Conclusion: Therefore, by definition, they are not referring to the same things.
"The Qur'anic Dilemma" - lol
But according to Islam Christians DO have the Injil with them. What is this Injil that is with them?
@@delusionsalyerWhere in Islam does it say Christians have the Injeel right now
Wow this is too easy
Also...did he really just say mecca was not literate...
according to rock inscriptions?😂😂😂😂😂
Mecca at that time had indeed a high percentage of illiteracy...doesn't mean they ALL were not literate...
glad to see a post from you bro. May allah bless you and accept your dua inshallah
He's literally making up stuff to cope right now
Just would love the same standards for the Bible, they shiver of the thought
The fact that anyone who believes that an immortal God can be killed, crucified and tortured for the sins of the humans can be more dumber.
"Wut"
Man Dr Phil is going to have a hard time alright trying to fix the person who actually believes this
What if christian are right? They always claim Jesus and Isa a.v is not the same person, the Yashua from the bible and the Quran is a different persons!
What if chrisitians are RIGHT?!? Think! To show how sinless Jesus is, they denigrate and humiliate all other previous prophets and messengers! To turn Jesus like a god being in human form!
But who can so misguide humanity? Who needs to away people from God? the bible shows us prophets in very bad shape, and this book tries to tell me how even God can make mistakes? How is too easy that prophets and messengers can be deceived as easily?
Think about it! Limiting God, make him human, denigrate and humiliate all other prophets and messengers...
The reality is that Christian Apologists cannot defend pagan beliefs like the Trinity or the Eternal sin. Neither can they defend the corruption in the Bible or why their lifestyles cannot match the lifestyle of Jesus (AS). Now they make ridiculous arguments to justify their futile beliefs. Ask them if Mary was a human being. Do they really believe a human being can give birth to a God.
7:43 Also, no evidences of first generation being Christians/Jews or where they came from, if not makkah, survived conveniently.
These people Allah has sealed their hearts, even when all evidence leads to the truth of Islam they create these fantastical theories and conspiracies.
At 2:57...Chris just said that there were ROCK INSCRIPTIONS in Mecca that proved the people of MECCA were not literate.
WAIT!! 🔍🤔 Did CHRIS just admit that there was a place called MECCA 😲
As selam aleykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh.
I highly recommend people watch the "intellectual Seerah" Playlist by Sapience institute, where they go over these topics of "did X and Y exist".
It's also interesting that he mentions the vegetation part. The famous orientalist Patricia Crone also once asked that why should the Quran mention vegetation outside of Arabia.
And these people don't even know that they are actually advocating for Islam and not against it, because this only reinforces the purpose of the Quran being a message to all mankind, where they can draw parallels to vegetation existing in their own places.
😂😂😂 what else? They gonna come up with .
JazakAllah. Please make a video about how the Quran distinguishes between the what was revealed to the Prophets and what "is in between their (Jews/Christians) hands"
I suggest people to really look into genuine academia and scholarly works recarding the Quran, Hadiths etc. Because you Will Be suprised on how much of the majority of modernday academia agrees with the traditional Islamic narratives about general things.
I heard about quran not revealed in mecca because it doesn't have vegetation that puzzles me 🤷♂️
Mecca does, Only not as much as Medina or cities in Yemen or the Levant. But it still had a number of palm trees and whatnot
Farid , how did you got the face of cp ??
I really want to know 😅
Thank you
If you can come together to create one verse like the one in the Qur'an
Woooow amazing video farid
نبغى مقاطع اكثر عن الشييييعة
I am not sure how to start this comment. Anyone who understands Arabic and reads the Quran will know immediately that it is not of a human origin. I guess a lot of these people, read the Quran in English and they approach it like their texts. This will cause these doubts.
Salam akhi, hope you are well inshallah, would you ever consider going through Jay smiths historical critique presentation?
Ws. Which one?
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Brother do you have a video about authenticity of nahj al-balagha or could you make one? Or would you recommend any piece of writing that proves it's not authentic/reliable?
جزاک الله خیرا
Nahjul-balagha.com
Nahjul-balagha.com
nahjul-balagha.net/reliability-of-nahjul-balagha/
@@FaridResponds May Allah bless you brother. Could you provide the same thing about Kitab al-Kafi and bihar al anwar?
I have a shia friend who now doubts his beliefs and wants to know what the truth is. It would be great if you could advise me on how I can help him.
جزاک الله خیرا
@@tatsuyakuragi3578 Watch my last two streams on the Dawah Over Dunya channel and my questions to the Shias there.
Salam ya Fraid. I just learned that Zaid ibn Thabit learned Hebrew in order to know how to read the Torah as ordered by the Prophet SAW.
Immediately a doubt came into my mind that the hebrew words in the Quran you mentioned like "Fathahikat" in the case of "she laughed" could have been learned from him? Also could not stories of the Torah be learned if Zaid could read the Torah? Clear this doubt please. JazakAllahu khair.
Wa alaykum alsalam. Good question.
Surat Hud was revealed in Makkah, before Zaid converted.
@@FaridResponds Oh I see, alright then! Thank you! On the second point, so no one accused the Prophet SAW of learning stories of the Prophets from Zaid RA?
@@ibrahimaziz2365 Never.
Those jahil Smith students are getting out of hands now
Salam Wa Rahmatullah Akhi May Allah reward you. I have a question: Is the Hadith of Yajuj and Majuj digging at the wall and saying “We are going to finnish this tomorrow In Shaa Allah” authentic?
He said it's not, you can watch the video of Alexander the great in his video
@@professorparadox795 Sanan Ibn Majah 4080. Sahih (Darassalam).
Baba Farid I love you for the sake of Allah
He invited you on his show to dialogue, will you?
Chris is part of SOCO and they can't even control their own chat. Absolutely vile things are said. And that's by the mods.
What for? Farid doesn’t need to dialogue with a deluded, lying pathetic fellow who doesn’t know what logic is and has not read any classical works on Islam in its original language. Nothing to dialogue about.
Could you make a video against Saint.Murad hes claims to have found mistakes in Quranic translation
At 3:20...and back then they only had Samsung phones...not iphone...right Chris? 😲😂😂🤪👈😂😂
ذكترني فيديو للدكتور سامي بعنوان "أغرب دليل على نبوة محمد" والدليل هو: "محمد من مكة"
بفيديو للدكتور سامي عامري*
This is just a rehash of Donner and Crone
Farid. Brother I seek advice. I hope we get on a chat. I was following ahlus-sunnah, then became Shia, then returned to ahlus-sunnah. I only seek advice.
My advice is to only accept what you find evidence for, and you have have no evidence Muhammad bin al-Hasan ever existing.
Did Farid really just raise a strawman? Chris says the Quran talks about geography that does not match Mecca. Farid says, Did Muhammad have access to information he shouldn’t have? What?!
this is a core reason why orientalists say what they say.
And Quran never say mecca is full of gardens. Infact when Quran talks about Abraham leaving Ishmael there, Abraham remarked that it was a valley of no cultivation. He even made dua that they maybe provided with fruits. And today mecca as we know is not suitable for cultivation but fruits from everywhere is transported there.
Would it not be more effective to talk about the greatly sought rain and gardens to desert dwellers than not?
In any case I know and memorized every verse of Quran and I know what I am talking about. You don't and neither do your scholars.
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku
You do realize that evidence of Mecca existing before 6th century seems to be all but lost and nothing exists to prove it was a trade center as claimed. Neighbouring cities have evidence, but they too have none of Mecca, even though it is close by. That is why the claims in Quran are doubtful.
@@cainblue448
Don't change the topic. The geography in Quran does not contradict it. There is no "mecca is the biggest trade center" verse in Quran.
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku
I did not say biggest trade center or that it was in Quran.
But what is in Quran is that it is the Mother of Cities. No archaeological evidence of this being oldest city on earth is there to be found anywhere. The footnote you see there also affirms it is the oldest place of worship.
S6:92
This is a blessed Book which We have revealed-confirming what came before it-so you may warn the Mother of Cities1 and everyone around it. Those who believe in the Hereafter ˹truly˺ believe in it and guard their prayers.
Aoa. Fareed bro can you please respond to Naqshwani’s Ashura speech, I thinks it’s against Ahlus Sunnah, even the title as well
FARID PLEASE READ!!!
so i read imam shafii said that aishia was prepubescent when they consummated their marriage, and so far no one refuted that based on my research.. how can i explain this to a kuffar?
I don't know where you read Imam Shafii saying that, as far as i know, in the Shafii School and Hanbali School, a woman is considered pre pubescent if she is below 15 and no sign of puberty occurs.
We know that Muhammad ﷺ consummated the marriage at 9, so if Aisha R.A was not physically mature at 9, why did the Prophet ﷺ wait for 3 years? It makes no sense.
@@carbonic9115 >>> We know that Muhammad ﷺ consummated the marriage at 9, so if Aisha R.A was not physically mature at 9, why did the Prophet ﷺ wait for 3 years?
===========================
I don't buy it.
Aisha was NOT a traumatized woman.
She was a woman leader and had her voices heard by her people.
She was one of the important figure.
She didn't come across as someone who was forced to marry as a little girl.
Moreover, not a single enemy of the Prophet ever used his marriage to Aishah as the reason to discredit him.
Most of the narratives printed in the books of hadith are reported only by Hisham ibn `Urwah, who was reporting on the authority of his father.
First of all, more people than just one, two or three should logically have reported.
It is strange that no one from Medina, where Hisham ibn `Urwah lived the first 71 years of his life narrated the event,
despite the fact that his Medinan pupils included the well-respected Malik ibn Anas.
The origins of the report of the narratives of this event are people from Iraq,
where Hisham is reported to have shifted after living in Medina for most of his life.
There are hadiths that put her age as 19 years old when she married the Prophet.
So there is a contradiction.
The narrative of the marriage of nine-year-old Aisha by Hisham ibn `Urwah cannot be held true when it is contradicted by many other reported narratives.
جزاك الله خيرا
Is that goldbridge