The Rise And Fall Of Anne Boleyn
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024
- Dr. Suzannah Lipscomb explores the early life of Anne Boleyn, one of history's most significant figures. Born into a wealthy family at Hever Castle, Anne received a remarkable education, shaped by her ambitious father, Sir Thomas Boleyn. Her formative years included serving at the court of Margaret of Austria and later in France. Returning to the English court in 1522, Anne emerged as a sophisticated and cosmopolitan woman. Ready to meet her future husband and murderer, King Henry VIII.
Welcome to Chronicle; your home for all things medieval history! With documentaries covering everything from the collapse of the Roman Empire to the beginnings of the Renaissance, from Hastings to Charlemagne, we'll be exploring everything the Middle Ages have to offer.
Subscribe now so you don't miss out!
Chronicle is part of the History Hit Network. To get in touch please email owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
📺 Discover the past on History Hit with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly presented by world-renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis, and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code CHRONICLE 👉 historyhit.com...
Suzannah Lipscomb documentaries are among the best whatever she decides to cover, this one included!
I love her work.
Here here!
Completely agree and I was thinking the exact same thing myself. She’s absolutely wonderful and her books are brilliant too.
In my next life I want to come back as a persona of Suzannah Lipscomb….. I want to study history, in old English, French, What a life, exploring the most interesting people and times of England
I absolutely love Suzannah Lipscomb, everything she does is filled with such passion and energy I can't help but be enthralled by her every word
We love her in Canada too!
Me too! She’s my FAVORITE historian.
Argentinian here, never tired of watching these docs, esp Tudor's.
Such a treat to watch this!! I thought I'd seen EVERYTHING that had to do with Anne Boleyn, and then I stumbled upon this episode!! So 😊 happy!!!
Suzannah presented the story of Anne Boleyn beautifully, just loved this video, well done Suzannah
I believe that Anne's inscription "The Time Will Come" has a religious, not a secular, meaning.
It might have a meaning both religiously and secularly
I hope you never stop working with Dr. Lipscomb, she’s amazing! Also wish you could work with Lucy Worsley. Maybe it’s not too unlikely now that she’s not working at Hampton Court anymore
Owen Emerson is a very jolly and cuddly looking historian. I always enjoy listening to him as well ☺️
I could listen to her all day!
I love this history and learning more about her and more ❤
Personally, I prefer Catherine of Aragon but Anne is a fascinating character.
Love both! Can’t stand Henry.
The one I really empathize with is Catherine Howard. She was basically executed for being an abused child, then slandered for it. At least the other wives were old enough to know what was happening to them.
Excellent, highly interesting, love to see more, 👍👍
Good this. Thanks!
Nice one Prof Liscombe and team. 🌟👍
My favourite Queen 👸 ❤❤ R.I.P Anne
What a beautiful narrative.
I'm descended from Mary Boleyn. Our family legend says Anne was born in 1503, George in 1506 and Mary in 1507.
Nothing to boast about
Never gets old! We all love Anne!!!
Now they say Ann didn't bring the French hood to court that it's already been there but I believe she made it more popular
I’ve one question for Suzannah….. does she believe Catherine Aragon consummated her first marriage to Arthur? I cannot believe it wasn’t…. Also, isn’t the first night of a diplomatic marriage observed to make sure it was consummated ?
In Spain, it was. They actually would check the sheets of the couple to look for blood.
I agree with you!
@@LT11721 I could definitely be wrong but it was part of the protocol that the 'morning after' sheets were inspected by a Royal Chamberlain. If they were not, in this case, I am not sure why. But I would point out that Arthur was an extremely naive and physically fragile boy. Catherine was a very religious lady who I believe would not lie about it. Henry broke the marriage up NOT her.
Queen Catherine stated before God she hadn’t. I don’t think a fervent Catholic would have lied.
@@annaelisavettavonnedozza9607course she would’ve if it would work in her favour
Brilliant
Video starts at 1:29
Would have loved to sit down and talk with her.
If she could know the future! She will not have accepted to be a queen!?!
Anne was the “It” girl of the 1520’s. Not a beauty, but loaded with sex appeal.
uploaded 8 days ago? This exhibition is a year old and long over.
I’ve seen her name spelled Bollin or Bullin, one of these.
Spelling wasn't standardised yet at the time. It was also spelt Bullen and Bulynn. Standard spellings really only took hold when the printing press with movable type became widely adopted.
Very difficult to accept female "historians" today; always a rather large crumb of sexism; women MUST revise. I find that Suzannah typifies this.
interesting
The 1501 theory is wrong, in my opinion. To take a letter that she wrote in about 1514, say that it couldn't possibly be written by a seven year old, and yet also say that the letter is sloppily written, both in terms of penmanship and her grasp of the French language, is contradictory. How is this an example, then, of a brilliant, exceptional young woman of 13 if the letter is such a disaster? Look at her own daughter, and the letters she wrote around 7 and then 13 and make a comparison. Clearly, if she was well educated and as gifted as people say she was... gifted enough to be given a prime position over her older sister... it's not implausible she was only 7 when she wrote it. Also, there is a misunderstanding that she was sent to Margaret's count as a maid of honour, but this is incorrect. She almost certainly was sent to be educated in the royal nursery. This letter was actually written in the palace where Margaret's nephew and nieces resided in for the bulk of the year. In France, she became exceptionally close to Claude sister, Renée, who was born in 1510... so much so that years after Anne's notorious end when she was 'the scandal of Christendom', Renée wrote that she would always have a soft spot for Elizabeth because she was such good friends with her mother, Anne. Now, would this be true of two young girls with a nine year age difference, or a three year difference? Sorry, Dr Lipscomb, but she was far more likely to have been born in 1507, which jives with other historical records that suggest this, and makes more sense in terms of Anne's age when Henry was courting and married her. If she was still unmarried at age 25 by the time Henry first noticed her, she was already pretty mature to be considered as a royal bride, especially for a man who was desperate for an heir. And to go through with a marriage, no matter how much in love with her he was, when she was already 32? Nah... not buying it.
Why is the mannequin representing Anne at Hever castle so small? Was she truly that petite?
❤
Rambo > Anne Boleyn 💪.
Huge girl crush. 😻 😂
😱
It was not worth it.
@@LaurieValdez-zk3dyHow do you mean?
You can't change history. That's an oxymoron.
No.
History being written by the victor, it can be reanalyzed. No one would have dared speak up for Henry's wives when he was alive.
History is regularly rewritten. Anyone who doesn't understand that is naive in the extreme and will always have a flawed view of the past.
That expression drives me crazy too.
18 minutes in I realized I don't give a shit about Anne Boleyn...
Hahahahaha you’re like “why the F am I watching this” 😂
@annaelisavettavonnedozza9607 RIGHT...?!? I want to hear about warfare and carnage, not about how she couldn't get preggers and whatnot... Something was off about the bird's minge-- so what...?!?
All HAIL SAINT Ann, who stood up against the Roman Catholic church
Oh please....the reformation threw thousands of monastic tenants out on their ears without warning, because all those lands were given off to Henry's toadies, along with all the poor and sick who were being taken care of by the church., along with all the educational establishments the church ran. Henry didn't ever reform himself....he continued to observe the Catholic rites till his death, he just became the boss instead of the pope. The monies from the churches properties were a major goal. Henry was basically robbing his own people to pay for his stupid wars and hiding it behind religion and the divorce.
Pretty sure a woman who got pregnant out of wedlock can’t be made a saint
Anne's interest in the Reformation was mostly about securing her offspring's claim to the throne. She was not particularly devout. Protestants shouldn't make her a saint for annoying the Pope any more than Catholics should make Mary I a saint for terrorizing Protestant clergy. Let's not be at each other's throats over religious wars from 500 years ago. I'm Catholic but I have nothing against Protestants.
Def not team Anne
You know the street urchins in Oliver Twist? Grabbing up and giving the church property caused massive poverty. That property is the social welfare system. That was basically stolen resulting in 100s of years of poverty for the lower class.