Have wanted one for years and recently purchased one. I definitely missed the opportunity to get these while they were trading lower, but this is a watch that I imagine staying in the collection forever so I can look past all of this. Nice video man!
The 16570 seem like they're super hot. Trading at an all time high. Do you think they will continue to rise? With box and papers in seeing them over 8k.
I bought a new Polar 16570 in late 1999. I had just got divorced and was cash rich, and wanted to replace my 1980 GMT which I bought new and had worn for 20 years. I was travelling internationally for work, and wanted dual time capability. As a 1999 it was the rare “Swiss” only dial (although I didn’t know it would become rare at the time) and still had lug holes. The Polar proved to be the perfect watch. I could wear it on the aircraft, setting to local time on landing. I could wear it under a suit to meetings, without looking like a pretentious Rolex owner, I could see the home time and local time instantly, important to make meetings when jet lagged, and to make conference calls back to the office and the all important calls to my wife. I could could swim in the hotel pool with it, and if I hired scuba gear, I could check out the local diving at the weekend. And hardly anyone recognised it back then as a Rolex watch. Flash forward 20 years, and I still have it. I also own a 114060 Submariner Ceramic no date, bought to replace the 16570 But it doesn’t replace it. It doesn’t do dual time zones, and attracts attention. Young blades come up to me in offices and bars and ask about my Sub, ask to see it, try it on, and tell me they want to buy one. Or worse - in bars some acne infested youth comes up waving his fake telling me he got it on Bangkok for $100. And for that reason, my Polar still gets a lot of wrist time and my Sub sits in its box. Buy a Polar Explorer 2. Its the perfect Rolex.
It's such a great looking watch! I'm always going to love the Exp2 Polar. But like most pre-owned Rolexes, there are technically better watches out there for less money. I couldn't justify spending Exp2 money when the GS SBGN00 watches are out there. Arguably not as timeless design or iconic, but technically better. If the GS and Exp2 were the same money, I'd get the Exp2 because of looks, and that fact it's a Rolex!
Adrian, great to see you weighing in on the conversation. Love the GS, and first in my book would be the Explorer II. I am just a fan boy of Field Watches.
@@BarkandJack, Adrian it's nice to see you here too. Sorry I have to disagree with you guys. While the Exp.2 is capable and durable watch, the only Explorer I want is the original (and either the 36mm or 39mm. For me it is the perfect watch.
Other than my dad’s Coke GMT Master II, the black dial version is my very favorite steel Rolex sports watch! So glad you’re enjoying yours, T3! I’ve been here since 5,000 subscribers and am enjoying the content more than ever! Keep it up!
I bought the black face 16570 new back in 2002 and paid about $3700 back then. Given the current list of about $8300, I'd say they are a good investment. My watch needs to go back for a service overhaul to have the case polished, dial relumed and timing reset but overall it's been a very good watch, well worth the money.
The 16570 is just timeless. I wish they would release an updated version of it. It really only needs a newer bracelet. I bought mine initially because it was the only Rolex I could afford. I sold it a few years later and now I regret it and want to replace it.
I’ve owned this for 24 years. I bought a Submariner and Explorer within 6 month back in 1998/1999. I sold the Submariner a few years ago but will keep this one and it is on my wrist right now. The only problem is that the tridium markers have diminished over time and only are readily in almost total darkness.
The 40mm Explorer ll in both dial versions will be hugely sought-after in years to come. It's the right size. A GMT without the bezel color vulgarity. The 'wrong' sorts of people are buying GMTs, and trade-to-trade transactions are driving up their prices.
My wrist size is the same as yours but I got a 42mm - wanted to get a 40mm but simply could not find out at the right time. I love the 42mm but I might get a 40mm as well one day. Anyway point of my comment - would recommend getting the MN strap with the white line - really is perfect for this watch. I rock that strap with a custom number on it, it will never see the bracelet again!
I own the Explorer 1 and love that watch as my every day wear watch. However, my weekender is currently the Seiko SKX 009. While I love that watch, I’m not the nautical type and I don’t dive. I do love traveling and outdoors and feel that the Explorer 2 would fit my collection much better. I’d still be able to stay with the “Explorer” theme and enjoy my collection. It is definitely the next grail watch for which I’ll have to save up!
Its is very cool (in either dial, but I prefer the POLAR in new, but love the black in vintage) and in my opinion it is one of the best Rolex watches this is still to take off. I finally got my my BIRTH YEAR grail watch after trying to find the right one of over a year T3, the 1973 Rolex Steve McQueen Explorer (1655) with box, papers, service history with all the patina & original scratches. Then two days later the same watch came available from 1972 being my wife BIRTH YEAR, so I have to pull the trigger on that as well, so we have a matching set. IT ALSO CAME AS TT HAS 73K SUBS.
I concur with you, I own both the polar 16570 and the black 16550. Best 2 watches in my Rolex collection. I wear these 2 more than my 41mm date just or even my submariner.
Without even seeing the video, no it doesn’t. This was under $3K just a while ago, and now it’s selling used for more than it costed brand new. And honestly value wise almost every Rolex nowadays is overpriced, That said, they are indeed great timepieces, they hold value like no other which can matter if you don’t plan to keep them forever, and also if you absolutely have to have one of their designs and none of the others, go for it
I just feel old rolexes are fantastic ...at old rolex prices but they seem to be similar or even more than new ones and for me, I'd want the new movement, bracelet and clasp if I'm paying £5+k
Great video of a now classic watch. Re: Rolling your time backwards - I've read you never want to do that (expect, I hear, Rolex manuals say it's ok/dispel that myth). Two points: First, the mechanisms are usually designed around moving forward, so some movements cannot take the stress of reversing properly. Second, after a mechanical watch settles in, reversing the watch against the pattern of wear may cause unnecessary additional wear. Put the myth to rest, Jory! Maybe a topic for an upcoming video?
Great episode and I agree with your comments except on the versatlity as I think it also wears great for business attire and fits nicely under the shirt cuffs. I've owned the same 16570 t
I just got a 16570 added my collection and put it on a navy Everest rubber band with the Rolex clasp (maybe a poor mans oyster flex) but my god this colour combination pops!!
I have owned a white dial (1997) version for a while and I agree about the perfect case size and design, you forget that it's on your wrist. I recently bought a 2007 black dial (no holes) version and I now prefer the black as an all rounder.
I have the black dial with the 3186 movement and I bought it on a whim and I have to say it has more charm than my Sub-c and Tudor BB GMT. It stays in the collection for a long time.
I love mine but I'm conscious of banging it into door frames and that bezel scratches are problematic. I tend to wear it with a shirt. My sub on the other hand I'm far less precious about even though it's worth considerably more.
I have the explorer 2 polar as well as the Pepsi gmt master. The polar gets the most wrist time. It is a 2000 with super luminova and drilled lugs. Absolutely love the white dial. A little birds tells me they might be updating it??? You heard anything ?
I prefer the explorer I over the explorer II, not much of a fan of it tbh but I do concede it is clearly a great watch that deserves respect and makes sense that it would align with some people’s tastes
I picked mine up a little while ago. 2003 same reference, its fantastic! It looks great on the bracelet and even better on leather imo. I wanted a watch to go on adventures around the world with me. Not sure I'll be taking mine out Jeeping with me, I usually wear my gshock for that, but maybe I'll get that daring eventually.
The bezel paint in many photos looks faded but actually isn’t. Mine has perfect paint but in photos looked faded. I prefer the 216570 but they’re all nice.
@SurfThomasVD - I would much prefer a 114270. However, can't convince my wife that a vintage piece is worth the investment. Any words of wisdom to convince her otherwise?
@@andreivasile9436- Interesting choice with the 115234 as it is a 34MM with the 3135 movement and fluted bezel. I have a 126303 and will honestly say that the smooth bezel is a scratch magnet. Biggest question for you to consider is which size feels right for you. 41MM with the 70-hour 3235 or the 34MM with the 48-hour 3135? Bottom Line - check how the DJ41 bracelet at the lugs fits on your wrist. Solid end link extends the lug dimensions with how the bracelet fits. 20/20 hindsight on my part, I should have gone with a DJ36. It sits on my 7" wrist better. In the end, you have to decide which watch speaks to you when you try it on at an AD. Which one makes you the happiest. Have no regrets with what you decide, and wear it with passion. Hope this helps.
@@reedgrabowski8314 Thanks I think i will go with the datejust mostly for the 70 hour power reserve and it looks better imo. Thanks for your time and for helping me make the decison. Cheers!
I always worry that this would look too small on my 8.5” wrists, but it seems to fit you well so I might have to track one down to try. Great video as always.
@TheTimeTeller hi TTT ..first of all... nice video :D as always superp quality.. ^^ BUT i have a question... :) recently i got a HAMILTON 9797 Field watch ARRI (motion picture co.) Edition as a gift... i looked all over google but i cant find the history of this watch .. do you know anything about it? .. i figured it is quite rare .. read something about that it is a promotionial watch made in the 80s. but just a few .. so quite limited.
idea for a show, bromeister! 1. bronze watches! 2. toughness of watches. can the get beat up? aquis, sub, seamaster, skx, super ocean? are they just jewelery or are they tough?
Let me start by saying that I love what people like you and Teddy are doing, so keep up the great work! I also love this piece and may end up buying one sometime. Having said that, it becomes harder and harder for me to pull the trigger on Rolex models as this bubble persists. When I think of some other watches I would like to acquire (Alpina, Glycine Airnan, Oris GMT, Nomos Club, and Sinn 556 - to name a few), I could pass on the explorer II and get three (or four) of those legitimately good watches for one Rolex. So “worth it” becomes a hard assertion for me to make. A guy - btw - who has owned VWs and BMWs both and can appreciate loving both and having to spend 1.5-2x for something you love more than the other. Oh to have a bigger bank account!
For the longest time the Explorer ii and GMTs were the dogs of the Rolex’s lineup. It’s funny how all of a sudden people will discover a less popular model and turn it into a craze. It wasn’t that long ago these were half the price they are now. The Explorer ii has always been a cheaper alternative to the GMT and a great all around daily wearer
UGH!! REALLY?? More air time for this watch??? :-) You're killing me, Jory!! This will be my next purchase when I am ready. I have loved this watch ever since you first aired it. I'm saving up in the meantime. Thank you for letting me know the cons. I will definitely look for the wear in the bezel numbering. Can anyone touch up the numbers or does it have to go back to Rolex to touch up? Like the black enhancements of a gold school ring?
Hi Jory, I have your other Rolex watch, the 1500. While it's small and understated it's exactly what makes it extremely versatile. I can take it out for a night at the bar or to some fancy whiskey tasting event in a suit.
This video was a decision-maker for me on a watch I already wanted. Got mine about a month ago and I'm loving it. for the reasons you list - wanted a GMT, and i think this is an awesome sport GMT example. Agree with the cons list ... although the "white dial formal wear" item is essentially a non-issue thanks to COVID. Anyway, looking at a JLC Reverso Duo for a dress watch anyway. Thanks Jori. Always very interested in your opinion ...
I hadn't realized this didn't have a quick set date. Other GMT's manage to do both. It also seems weird to put that on the second click out on the crown since you have to go through the hacking seconds to push it back in. It would make more sense to have the hour set on the first click and the full time set on the second. If the pain flakes out of the bezel, then Rolex should be ashamed. There is zero excuse for that from this company. My major issues with it are more personal taste than anything else. I hate cyclops lenses, and it would be a little on the small side for a sports watch on my wrist. I like the white dial. It would work fine with a rubber or NATO strap as well. Who cares if it can't be used in a formal situation. One could certainly wear it in office casual. If you wear a sports watch instead of a dress watch at formal occasions, my assumption is you don't go to formal occasions very often and are just making due.
My buddy has a 450.00 fake one. Got it quick and honestly I like it more than my real one. It’s hard to believe the fake ones these days. I can tell because I wear my real one every day. But nobody else can tell. Only bummer is he’s a good friend and hanging out with matching watches looks to effing gay.
Hey Jory you had a video about the omega deep sea driver 15,000 ft deep what about the Swiss military dive watch that broke world records for the deepest at 20,000 ft I would like to see a review about that watch and maybe a a head to head with the James Cameron Rolex deep sea and the omega with the Swiss military watch thanks
I own two rolexes (one inherited from an uncle, one hand-me-down from my father), and they just don't do it for me. Neither does this watch. I really want to appreciate and like rolexes the way others do, but I just can't. They don't speak to me.
Nice looking watch but what’s with GMT’s. It seems almost every watch company has a new GMT this year which is odd as less than 10% of the population ever travels out of their own time zone.
OK I am a few balance-wheel ticks away from selling all my watches except for a $15 Casio digital, and using that and my cell phone (serenity now...).🙄
These may have gone up more than any other model by percentage? I bought mine about 1 1/2 yrs ago for $4450 with box, etc... Didnt bond with it like I thought I would. Ended up selling to my friend for $3,000 and a vintage Air King. Basically an equal trade. Same watch is now selling for $6500. Doesnt make me wish I still had it. BUT...could have got a lot better trade. lol Oh well
Man, I remember when these could be had for $3500. Woulda shoulda coulda. I have the 216570 polar. If I had to go to one watch (god forbid!!) it would be that one.
@@thetimeteller LOL, yea, that would be about the time. You could totally find the red GMT version for around that, no box or papers, used for that. Locally, our Rloex AD had 3, he could not move them. For right around 4k, but I'm sure you could have walked out the door with one at that price if you had the cash. The orange GMT hand was where it was at, back ythen, that one was always sold out. They've jumped up and now both GMT hand versions are going for the same price, nobody cares anymore about the GMT hand, it's all about the case size now. I'm curious to see if these continue to go up or if the market has peaked on these. Thanks for the great video as always!
Since you are a car guy i will explain how i see rolex. Rolex is the G Class of the watch world, and the G Class is the Rolex of the car world. it is capable, well build, holds its value, and most of the times used as a status symbol rather than a tool that it's been created to be.
I owned one of these, traded it away about 6 months ago. Great watch and as you mentioned it's quirky with a lot of character, but because of the Rolex effect on this model, I just couldn't justify the new market value. I was very happy with it, and happy I could get so much out of the value too. The increased value was actually a detriment for enjoyment, as I had to begin babying my sports watch... It was also annoying to set the date/time/and GMT hand correctly in my watch rotation as I only wore it once a week in the rotation
Have wanted one for years and recently purchased one. I definitely missed the opportunity to get these while they were trading lower, but this is a watch that I imagine staying in the collection forever so I can look past all of this. Nice video man!
Thanks man! I’m excited for you to “Explore” your 16570 as well! 😎🙏
Wear it in good health!
@@thetimeteller Haha thanks, man! It's hard to take off the wrist.
Teddy Baldassarre complete agree, I’ve had mine a year and I love it
The 16570 seem like they're super hot. Trading at an all time high. Do you think they will continue to rise? With box and papers in seeing them over 8k.
@@evansauto2491 good question bro
Who is here sitting broke watching this video?
I just bought the Apollo 11 50th anniversary edition so I'm definitely in the "broke but watching" group! But happily so...
@@7OnTheTube Nope you are not qualified to be broke
As long as there's a check coming every month, you're not broke!
Dude, I’m 13. I can’t even afford this if I got a job.
@@ianbarber2937 On the positive side... You have plenty of time to save for it
Bought mine over 10 years ago.... can’t believe how much it increased in value. I wear mine on leather, Nato and bracelet depending on my mood....
Formal attire be dammed. This is the coolest Rolex out there. Nice review.
I bought a new Polar 16570 in late 1999. I had just got divorced and was cash rich, and wanted to replace my 1980 GMT which I bought new and had worn for 20 years. I was travelling internationally for work, and wanted dual time capability.
As a 1999 it was the rare “Swiss” only dial (although I didn’t know it would become rare at the time) and still had lug holes.
The Polar proved to be the perfect watch. I could wear it on the aircraft, setting to local time on landing. I could wear it under a suit to meetings, without looking like a pretentious Rolex owner, I could see the home time and local time instantly, important to make meetings when jet lagged, and to make conference calls back to the office and the all important calls to my wife. I could could swim in the hotel pool with it, and if I hired scuba gear, I could check out the local diving at the weekend.
And hardly anyone recognised it back then as a Rolex watch.
Flash forward 20 years, and I still have it. I also own a 114060 Submariner Ceramic no date, bought to replace the 16570 But it doesn’t replace it.
It doesn’t do dual time zones, and attracts attention. Young blades come up to me in offices and bars and ask about my Sub, ask to see it, try it on, and tell me they want to buy one. Or worse - in bars some acne infested youth comes up waving his fake telling me he got it on Bangkok for $100.
And for that reason, my Polar still gets a lot of wrist time and my Sub sits in its box.
Buy a Polar Explorer 2. Its the perfect Rolex.
It's such a great looking watch! I'm always going to love the Exp2 Polar. But like most pre-owned Rolexes, there are technically better watches out there for less money. I couldn't justify spending Exp2 money when the GS SBGN00 watches are out there. Arguably not as timeless design or iconic, but technically better. If the GS and Exp2 were the same money, I'd get the Exp2 because of looks, and that fact it's a Rolex!
Hi there
shashank shukla hi 👋🏻
Adrian, great to see you weighing in on the conversation. Love the GS, and first in my book would be the Explorer II. I am just a fan boy of Field Watches.
@@reedgrabowski8314 Thanks Reed. The Exp2 certainly has a more rugged, adventurous look about it.
@@BarkandJack, Adrian it's nice to see you here too. Sorry I have to disagree with you guys. While the Exp.2 is capable and durable watch, the only Explorer I want is the original (and either the 36mm or 39mm. For me it is the perfect watch.
Other than my dad’s Coke GMT Master II, the black dial version is my very favorite steel Rolex sports watch! So glad you’re enjoying yours, T3! I’ve been here since 5,000 subscribers and am enjoying the content more than ever! Keep it up!
I bought the black face 16570 new back in 2002 and paid about $3700 back then. Given the current list of about $8300, I'd say they are a good investment.
My watch needs to go back for a service overhaul to have the case polished, dial relumed and timing reset but overall it's been a very good watch, well worth the money.
The 16570 is just timeless. I wish they would release an updated version of it. It really only needs a newer bracelet. I bought mine initially because it was the only Rolex I could afford. I sold it a few years later and now I regret it and want to replace it.
It was way more worth it when they were selling for $3500-$4000 a couple years ago. That Rolex bubble is real.
I’ve owned this for 24 years. I bought a Submariner and Explorer within 6 month back in 1998/1999. I sold the Submariner a few years ago but will keep this one and it is on my wrist right now. The only problem is that the tridium markers have diminished over time and only are readily in almost total darkness.
The 40mm Explorer ll in both dial versions will be hugely sought-after in years to come. It's the right size. A GMT without the bezel color vulgarity. The 'wrong' sorts of people are buying GMTs, and trade-to-trade transactions are driving up their prices.
My wrist size is the same as yours but I got a 42mm - wanted to get a 40mm but simply could not find out at the right time. I love the 42mm but I might get a 40mm as well one day. Anyway point of my comment - would recommend getting the MN strap with the white line - really is perfect for this watch. I rock that strap with a custom number on it, it will never see the bracelet again!
I own the Explorer 1 and love that watch as my every day wear watch. However, my weekender is currently the Seiko SKX 009. While I love that watch, I’m not the nautical type and I don’t dive. I do love traveling and outdoors and feel that the Explorer 2 would fit my collection much better. I’d still be able to stay with the “Explorer” theme and enjoy my collection. It is definitely the next grail watch for which I’ll have to save up!
Bought mine new in 2004. Still love it. Gets regular rotation.
In ‘04, I was looking at this & a TAG Heuer 2000 auto as my first nice watch. I went with the TAG. Damn.
A strap showcase with this watch would be fun. White dial watches often benefit from unusual colors.
I have this and the Explorer. I love this watch and wear it more, BECAUSE of the white dial. Love the Explorer also but for different reasons.
What are they going for now (with box and papers) late 2000's? Mine is new from 2007.
Its is very cool (in either dial, but I prefer the POLAR in new, but love the black in vintage) and in my opinion it is one of the best Rolex watches this is still to take off. I finally got my my BIRTH YEAR grail watch after trying to find the right one of over a year T3, the 1973 Rolex Steve McQueen Explorer (1655) with box, papers, service history with all the patina & original scratches. Then two days later the same watch came available from 1972 being my wife BIRTH YEAR, so I have to pull the trigger on that as well, so we have a matching set. IT ALSO CAME AS TT HAS 73K SUBS.
Steve Mcqeen never wore an explorer
What do you think about the value of polar 16570 with Swiss only dial ?
I have this watch in 42. I’ve had the 40 but prefer the larger size. Love my white dial!!!
I’m the same. I love my 42. Tried my friends 40, don’t like it.
I concur with you, I own both the polar 16570 and the black 16550. Best 2 watches in my Rolex collection. I wear these 2 more than my 41mm date just or even my submariner.
Without even seeing the video, no it doesn’t. This was under $3K just a while ago, and now it’s selling used for more than it costed brand new. And honestly value wise almost every Rolex nowadays is overpriced, That said, they are indeed great timepieces, they hold value like no other which can matter if you don’t plan to keep them forever, and also if you absolutely have to have one of their designs and none of the others, go for it
Man, I took up watch collecting too late! $3,000-$4,000 ain't cheap by any stretch, but it's more attainable than $10,000!
I just feel old rolexes are fantastic
...at old rolex prices but they seem to be similar or even more than new ones and for me, I'd want the new movement, bracelet and clasp if I'm paying £5+k
This watch was never under 3k. Even during the 2008 crash, it was selling for over 4K with box and paper. Stop the false nostalgia
@@johnr6145 thank you for putting some perspective for us new collectors
Great video Jory. The explorer 2 and the milgauss are my favorite Rolex models currently available.
Great video of a now classic watch. Re: Rolling your time backwards - I've read you never want to do that (expect, I hear, Rolex manuals say it's ok/dispel that myth). Two points: First, the mechanisms are usually designed around moving forward, so some movements cannot take the stress of reversing properly. Second, after a mechanical watch settles in, reversing the watch against the pattern of wear may cause unnecessary additional wear. Put the myth to rest, Jory! Maybe a topic for an upcoming video?
@The Time Teller
Great episode and I agree with your comments except on the versatlity as I think it also wears great for business attire and fits nicely under the shirt cuffs. I've owned the same 16570 t
Me too,right there w/ you. Just got mine back from service: brand new all over again, amazing and very well worth it!
Good video! How do you feel about the new Exp 2 (post 2011)?
I just got a 16570 added my collection and put it on a navy Everest rubber band with the Rolex clasp (maybe a poor mans oyster flex) but my god this colour combination pops!!
I think Archie Paul Pluta moved the dial of desirability on this watch.Rooooolexxxxx
I have owned a white dial (1997) version for a while and I agree about the perfect case size and design, you forget that it's on your wrist.
I recently bought a 2007 black dial (no holes) version and I now prefer the black as an all rounder.
Hmmm, Maybe I’m crazy but the lugs seem to be asymmetrical from side to side @6:32
I've got one and I love it for the reasons you talked about in the video. Mine is the no-holes case.
I have the black dial with the 3186 movement and I bought it on a whim and I have to say it has more charm than my Sub-c and Tudor BB GMT. It stays in the collection for a long time.
I love mine but I'm conscious of banging it into door frames and that bezel scratches are problematic. I tend to wear it with a shirt. My sub on the other hand I'm far less precious about even though it's worth considerably more.
I have the explorer 2 polar as well as the Pepsi gmt master. The polar gets the most wrist time. It is a 2000 with super luminova and drilled lugs. Absolutely love the white dial. A little birds tells me they might be updating it??? You heard anything ?
Awesome Watch! I'm also a big fan of the 42mm 216570 variant.
Dean Speerbrecher the new version just looks unbalanced and bloated
Interesting alternative Bell & Ross BR V2-93 GMT. Has a quick date set also.
I prefer the explorer I over the explorer II, not much of a fan of it tbh but I do concede it is clearly a great watch that deserves respect and makes sense that it would align with some people’s tastes
Love the size...also not as chunky as the new ones...
I love mine I have the Swiss only dial polar. One thing when I wind it it always seems to grind in the first twist.
40 mm Rolex Explorer II polar + 40 mm Rolex GMT Master 2 Pepsi + Omega Speedmaster professional man on the moon = Holy Trinity of watches
Hi Jory. Great video. Do you know if this reference number has white gold markers and hands or if this watch is completely made of stainless steel?
I picked mine up a little while ago. 2003 same reference, its fantastic! It looks great on the bracelet and even better on leather imo. I wanted a watch to go on adventures around the world with me. Not sure I'll be taking mine out Jeeping with me, I usually wear my gshock for that, but maybe I'll get that daring eventually.
The bezel paint in many photos looks faded but actually isn’t. Mine has perfect paint but in photos looked faded. I prefer the 216570 but they’re all nice.
yes I have one from 2004, I love it! clean and in excellent condition
Explorer I all the way baybeeeeee
36MM or 39MM?
@@reedgrabowski8314, in my opinion you can't go wrong either way. Currently lovin' my 39mm!
@ John Turner Jr - fabulous! I am currently trying to cultivate two ADs to call me when they get a 214270.
Reed Grabowski 36Mm
@SurfThomasVD - I would much prefer a 114270. However, can't convince my wife that a vintage piece is worth the investment. Any words of wisdom to convince her otherwise?
I know the orange gmt hand is traditionally orange, but I like, and have seen, one like yours with the red gmt hand.
Hi!
Should i get rolex datejust or oysterperpetual.
Is rado captain cook good?
thanks
Andrei, what Datejust and oyster perpetual reference #s are you interested in? How do you intend to wear your watch?
Hi Reed the refernce number for datejust is 126300 and 115234 for the oysterperpetual.
Thanks!
@@andreivasile9436- Interesting choice with the 115234 as it is a 34MM with the 3135 movement and fluted bezel. I have a 126303 and will honestly say that the smooth bezel is a scratch magnet. Biggest question for you to consider is which size feels right for you. 41MM with the 70-hour 3235 or the 34MM with the 48-hour 3135? Bottom Line - check how the DJ41 bracelet at the lugs fits on your wrist. Solid end link extends the lug dimensions with how the bracelet fits. 20/20 hindsight on my part, I should have gone with a DJ36. It sits on my 7" wrist better. In the end, you have to decide which watch speaks to you when you try it on at an AD. Which one makes you the happiest. Have no regrets with what you decide, and wear it with passion. Hope this helps.
@@reedgrabowski8314 Thanks
I think i will go with the datejust mostly for the 70 hour power reserve and it looks better imo.
Thanks for your time and for helping me make the decison.
Cheers!
@@andreivasile9436 If you can save some additional money for your acquisition, get one with the white gold fluted bezel.
I love mine, also because my father gave it to me as a gift,but i think it actually looks good in a formal attire
When can we get a state of the collection?
Do any tritium watches from the late 90's still glow on their own?
phila3884 - I wouldn’t think so, I have one from 2010, the lum is very low, I think in 10 more years it’ll be gone.
I have this 10 years and counting. Awesome watch.
I always worry that this would look too small on my 8.5” wrists, but it seems to fit you well so I might have to track one down to try.
Great video as always.
My favorite Rolex
I have this watch, I sold it to hodinkee but I had to take it back no matter what the cost is. Now, I got it back.
@TheTimeTeller hi TTT ..first of all... nice video :D as always superp quality.. ^^ BUT i have a question... :) recently i got a HAMILTON 9797 Field watch ARRI (motion picture co.) Edition as a gift... i looked all over google but i cant find the history of this watch .. do you know anything about it? .. i figured it is quite rare .. read something about that it is a promotionial watch made in the 80s. but just a few .. so quite limited.
idea for a show, bromeister! 1. bronze watches! 2. toughness of watches. can the get beat up? aquis, sub, seamaster, skx, super ocean? are they just jewelery or are they tough?
I paid $4000 US for mine 15 years ago from an AD. Totally worth it.
Let me start by saying that I love what people like you and Teddy are doing, so keep up the great work! I also love this piece and may end up buying one sometime. Having said that, it becomes harder and harder for me to pull the trigger on Rolex models as this bubble persists. When I think of some other watches I would like to acquire (Alpina, Glycine Airnan, Oris GMT, Nomos Club, and Sinn 556 - to name a few), I could pass on the explorer II and get three (or four) of those legitimately good watches for one Rolex. So “worth it” becomes a hard assertion for me to make. A guy - btw - who has owned VWs and BMWs both and can appreciate loving both and having to spend 1.5-2x for something you love more than the other. Oh to have a bigger bank account!
I've the 16570 and it's the most versatile piece I have. Great watch
For the longest time the Explorer ii and GMTs were the dogs of the Rolex’s lineup. It’s funny how all of a sudden people will discover a less popular model and turn it into a craze. It wasn’t that long ago these were half the price they are now. The Explorer ii has always been a cheaper alternative to the GMT and a great all around daily wearer
By changing the strap, it could pass for a dress watch somewhat but its definitely a casual watch
Yes the videos showcasing the bands should be next!
UGH!! REALLY?? More air time for this watch??? :-) You're killing me, Jory!! This will be my next purchase when I am ready. I have loved this watch ever since you first aired it. I'm saving up in the meantime. Thank you for letting me know the cons. I will definitely look for the wear in the bezel numbering. Can anyone touch up the numbers or does it have to go back to Rolex to touch up? Like the black enhancements of a gold school ring?
Hi Jory, I have your other Rolex watch, the 1500. While it's small and understated it's exactly what makes it extremely versatile. I can take it out for a night at the bar or to some fancy whiskey tasting event in a suit.
I have the polar explorer 2 42mm and LOVE it. It’s the largest Rolex I own but I really love it!
Explorer 2 is amazing.
I love mine with the polar dial, thinking about tracking down a 39MM. Just a comfortable watch to wear.
This video was a decision-maker for me on a watch I already wanted. Got mine about a month ago and I'm loving it. for the reasons you list - wanted a GMT, and i think this is an awesome sport GMT example. Agree with the cons list ... although the "white dial formal wear" item is essentially a non-issue thanks to COVID. Anyway, looking at a JLC Reverso Duo for a dress watch anyway. Thanks Jori. Always very interested in your opinion ...
Thanks, boss!! Enjoy your new watch!
Jory,
When can we expect a state of the collection video from you?
I've been saving for this piece but unfortunately the price is too high now.
Might have to go Omega SMP.
These vids dont help me 😕
Just picked one up, “T” dial beautiful watch
Love it, becoming one of my favorites in my collection. Have the black face with white rubber B strap. 👍
Overrate? no. Overpriced? HELL YES!
These have definitely become more popular and valuable
I hadn't realized this didn't have a quick set date. Other GMT's manage to do both. It also seems weird to put that on the second click out on the crown since you have to go through the hacking seconds to push it back in. It would make more sense to have the hour set on the first click and the full time set on the second. If the pain flakes out of the bezel, then Rolex should be ashamed. There is zero excuse for that from this company. My major issues with it are more personal taste than anything else. I hate cyclops lenses, and it would be a little on the small side for a sports watch on my wrist. I like the white dial. It would work fine with a rubber or NATO strap as well. Who cares if it can't be used in a formal situation. One could certainly wear it in office casual. If you wear a sports watch instead of a dress watch at formal occasions, my assumption is you don't go to formal occasions very often and are just making due.
As a watch enthusiast but a economical person it’s hard to justify a watch costing more than $5k..
My buddy has a 450.00 fake one. Got it quick and honestly I like it more than my real one. It’s hard to believe the fake ones these days. I can tell because I wear my real one every day. But nobody else can tell. Only bummer is he’s a good friend and hanging out with matching watches looks to effing gay.
How much are this going for today?
It worth the money if you like it.
Hey Jory you had a video about the omega deep sea driver 15,000 ft deep what about the Swiss military dive watch that broke world records for the deepest at 20,000 ft I would like to see a review about that watch and maybe a a head to head with the James Cameron Rolex deep sea and the omega with the Swiss military watch thanks
Dennis Munge It was metres not feet! 😜
Very good makro shots and focusing- top!
I own two rolexes (one inherited from an uncle, one hand-me-down from my father), and they just don't do it for me. Neither does this watch.
I really want to appreciate and like rolexes the way others do, but I just can't. They don't speak to me.
Sell to me then
Got a 2000 Exp2 in Black. Great watch. I picked it over the Sub due to comfort, 24 hour hand, and uniqueness. And throw in a $1500 savings as a bonus.
Nice choice vs Sub...a bit more unique.
Have one in polar white great watch! Nice video.
16550 Cream Rail Dial Explorer ii is one of my grails!! Love the 16570 as well though!
Nice looking watch but what’s with GMT’s. It seems almost every watch company has a new GMT this year which is odd as less than 10% of the population ever travels out of their own time zone.
My wife has this one and loves it. It’s her grail. I have the Tudor gmt . Perfect couple :)
How are u enjoying the Tudor?
iHaejeog I love it
OK I am a few balance-wheel ticks away from selling all my watches except for a $15 Casio digital, and using that and my cell phone (serenity now...).🙄
I love the newer explorer ll with the orange gmt hand!
Nicholas Alonso way too big, I tried on both and went for the older model
These may have gone up more than any other model by percentage? I bought mine about 1 1/2 yrs ago for $4450 with box, etc... Didnt bond with it like I thought I would. Ended up selling to my friend for $3,000 and a vintage Air King. Basically an equal trade. Same watch is now selling for $6500. Doesnt make me wish I still had it. BUT...could have got a lot better trade. lol Oh well
It is one of the coolest watches Rolex makes! I can’t afford one, but would love to have one!
If I had that model of Explorer II, I'd definitely get a leather strap that matches the numerals.
Man, I remember when these could be had for $3500. Woulda shoulda coulda.
I have the 216570 polar. If I had to go to one watch (god forbid!!) it would be that one.
just got this...and i love it!
Under 10k!? Under $4k for sure, especially the red gmt hand version. It’s a cool watch, especially at 40mm.
Under $4k? Maybe 6 years ago... for a fake one. 😂🤷🏻♂️
@@thetimeteller LOL, yea, that would be about the time. You could totally find the red GMT version for around that, no box or papers, used for that. Locally, our Rloex AD had 3, he could not move them. For right around 4k, but I'm sure you could have walked out the door with one at that price if you had the cash. The orange GMT hand was where it was at, back ythen, that one was always sold out. They've jumped up and now both GMT hand versions are going for the same price, nobody cares anymore about the GMT hand, it's all about the case size now. I'm curious to see if these continue to go up or if the market has peaked on these. Thanks for the great video as always!
Since you are a car guy i will explain how i see rolex. Rolex is the G Class of the watch world, and the G Class is the Rolex of the car world. it is capable, well build, holds its value, and most of the times used as a status symbol rather than a tool that it's been created to be.
Almost as underrated as the YM Rolesium 16622.
I owned one of these, traded it away about 6 months ago. Great watch and as you mentioned it's quirky with a lot of character, but because of the Rolex effect on this model, I just couldn't justify the new market value. I was very happy with it, and happy I could get so much out of the value too. The increased value was actually a detriment for enjoyment, as I had to begin babying my sports watch... It was also annoying to set the date/time/and GMT hand correctly in my watch rotation as I only wore it once a week in the rotation
Get a two or three watch winder. It’ll solve your rotation issues.👍🏻
I consider myself very fortunate to have mine. Let me keep being lucky.
My grand pa had this for 28 years 🙂