The 16750 has always been my favorite Rolex, hands down! I bought my polar one brand new in 2003 and I still love it! It was hard for me to decide between the polar and the black..., I end up buying a black one two and they are my 2 favorite watches in my 10 watch collection! I would not change them for any other Rolex model.
Love the 16570 - 40mm red GMT hand, it is just unique and has become an iconic classic and the fact they are no longer continuing 40mm it will go up in value.
Just got the 216570 on Wednesday of this week. It’s my first Rolex and I could not be happier with this purchase. I’m a bigger guy so the larger casing fits me nicely. I love that I can wear this at work with dress clothes and on weekends with jeans and a t-shirt. So glad you posted this video!! Keep up the great work!!
And you’re the typical internet troll who has nothing better to do than read and post comments all day. At least I have a nice time piece at the end of the day!
I bought a 16570 T in 2015 for $3150. I am a Land Rover guy who appreciates classic design. I put it in the safe until today and started looking into value. Holy crap...I should have bought three or four. I love that it does not look at all pretentious. Simple clean design. Thank you for a great video.
Absolutely the 216570. I have nothing against smaller, mid-sized watches and think people should consider size when buying a watch, but I do get tired of reviewers with small wrists whining during every single review for a return to 1940-50s sized watches. I don't personally like "dinner plate" sized watches, neither do I buy them, but some people enjoy them. Surely we can allow for differences in taste and wrist sizes and the fact that many people like the availability of larger watches and that those modern watches look good on larger wrists and with current style. A fedora looked great on Humphrey Bogart, but fedoras aren't appropriate in the 2020s.
yeah I got an 8 inch wrist and got a 216570 and it's anything BUT large. sad story is... brand new from AD, bezel is slightly misaligned to the right, and the minute indexes are touching the rehaut at the bottom... donno if I should have it corrected
@@pizza.doctor im with you..at over 8 inches myself those guys think we are freaks and we cant find any hot watches that actually look like a mans size on us, it would be great of they made nice ones that were between 48 and 52 mm
Both references are really unique cool pieces. I opted with the 216570 polar and I love the orange 24h and also the orange lettering on the dial. You cant go wrong with either of these awesome watches.
Honoured to be mentioned by you Teddy. Thanks a million! The Explorer's are such hidden gems (understated, very un-rolex for the most part) I had a thought the other day about whether Tudor would ever consider reintroducing the 1655 aesthetic and made some mock-ups. And I fully agree that the modern Exp 2 should get a bit of a refresh (bringing the size down would be great for us skinny guys) maybe the introduction of a Ceramic bezel insert, but a Grey insert instead of Black. Maybe Basel 2020 will be the year of the Explorer?
@@ekimandersom4478 The sbgm247 is more expensive than the Tudor Bb pro. So you’re wrong there, you’re also wrong about the finishing. Looks is completely subjective, the only thing I’d really give you there is GS just has better dials all-around
My 16570 polar has recently been serviced, and is running +1 second after 6 weeks ... not per day, TOTAL. Not only that but it has been dropped once onto a wood floor from about 4' ... and I do basically everything in it. I love this watch so much. Good choice Teddy!
Had a 16570, now a 216570. Looking forward to the 50th anniversary model in 2021. The orange 24 hour hand on the 216570 matching the “Explorer II” script is fantastic.
I have owned many watches, as I get older, style is important, but comfort is just as important. I always found larger watches to clunky and hard to get over a coat or shirt etc. The sweet spot for me, is the 39-40mm range. I own a few Rolex watches, and a 16570 is one I own. I like the watch a lot, no regrets. I couldn’t care a less, if others knowI wear a Rolex or not. Thanks for the video.
No. Perhaps Rolex could take note of what Omega has done with their Planet Ocean line and offer multiple sizes. As I indicated in another comment, guys with larger wrists simply can’t wear 40mm watches without looking ridiculous. Just imagine a world with footwear available in only one size. Great idea, huh? 😁
@@VaiSolo You could just extend the bracelet ;) Nah I totally get you, I would have a thicker wrist by most standards but I do prefer the smaller watches 36mm-40mm is my comfort zone but the new Rolex case sizes wear much larger such as the 116610 vs 16610.
@@rudimussrodelnAt this point, I’m so accustomed to a 44 mm Deepsea that I can’t even go back to a GMT Master - which really bothers me because it has always been my favorite all-around watch. In fact, I’m wearing a 50 mm Suunto right now just because it has so many useful functions, so anything around 40 mm definitely feels weird…
Just purchased the 16570, black dial, Super LumiNova, drilled lugs, and solid endlinks. Love the value. Under 10K the Rolex’s you’re limited to are primarily time only, or with date under 40mm (really mainly 36mm and under). At 39mm you’re literally only getting time only. So to get a Rolex with complications, with the Rolex classics (Mercedes hands, magnified date), while still being lowkey, it’s just amazing.
I’ve owned a polar in both the 40mm and 42mm case size. Both are terrific watches. For me, at 73 the 42 is my choice. It’s easier on my eyes. Additionally, the 42 has a much better clasp.
If you plan to get 42mm i suggest to get the black version because 42 looks better in black. If you fancy 16570 40mm get the polar (that is a must) Trust me
I like how you always show a proper wrist shot so people can get a idea how a watch might fit them. The 42mm didn’t look bad at all on your 6.25” wrist. You could wear either. I wasn’t thinking it would work for my 7” wrist but maybe it will after all
I like the thicker/orange GMT hand, and also love the orange type on the dial of 216570. I'd prefer the 40mm case, but would still pick the newest gen based on the use of the complementary orange, and the drastically improved oyster bracelet.
I couldn’t agree more, the polar dial is a total game changer. I own a 216570 myself and I love it. I’ve had every Rolex except a Daytona and air king and IMO it’s the best all around watch yet it stands out from the crowd.
Hey Ted, thanks again for another stellar review but this time on a timeless classic- the Rolex Explorer II. This watch is truly the embodiment of a "one watch collection" and the minor scratches on the case speak volumes to your immense appreciation and utility for the piece.
If you like skiing, there is no other watch on the planet better than the Explorer II Polar. I got mine 15 years ago, feels great, I always keep it on when swimming
I also swim with mine! I was thinking, am I crazy? After Teddy mentioned maybe not to. I think as long as within a reasonable time of service or water resist test its fine.
I'm a 216570 owner. my father had a 16570 in his collection when I was in college and I always loved it. My first Rolex was a Stainless Sub. Then I made the jump to the Explorer II (216570) and have worn it day in and day out since 2013. Great everyday wear (just as Teddy said). I have a few other brands and they all get wrist time, but this is the go-to and I have a hard time reaching over it in the winder to grab something different. Great review!
I’m a 50 something curmudgeon but I think the older bracelets wear much more comfy. However I love the newer dial but wish they’d left it at 40. Rolex got into the 40+ game too late and is starting to look a little silly for it by 2022 here.
Really nice review, Teddy. Very professionally videoed too. I just bought my first polar Explorer II (circa 2011) last weekend and wore it on the slopes skiing-very cool look in the snow indeed. The red hour hand is its most stunning feature and unique compared to almost every other watch available, particularly striking in the current model. I actually really like the black dial version too as the hour markers highlights its distinctive 18ct gold finish that is not so apparent on the white dial, lending itself a more dressy appearance. It’s almost a different watch in that regard.
Was initially put off by the 216750 . Thought it looked clumsy and just didn’t appeal to me going by images online . Went to purchase the older model 16570 . Tried both on and to my surprise instantly fell in love with the 216570 black dial. The slim case makes the 42 size work perfectly. It hugs the wrist . Absolutely stunning . My advice try one on and like me you might be pleasantly surprised ! 👍🏻
here's what I think, the white dial is better in the 16570 while the black is better on the 216570/226570. The black 42mm helps the watch look a bit smaller while the white 42 looks large and I find the orange gmt hand works better with the black dial than the white, while the red gmt hand complements the white 16570 nicely.
Your previous 1 month review of the 16570 was the last straw- I ended up buying the exact same model last month! I can't seem to rotate it off my wrist. I follow the all-purpose ethos in almost everything I buy and this thing is the real deal. Basically a GMT Master II at a 30% discount and no "questions" .
I've got a tritium 16570 (1995) I bought about a year ago and I swim with it! I think as long as its within a reasonable time of service or pressure test its ok (I got it certified pre-owned, so serviced by RSC). I agree the 16570 takes the cake although the bracelet is so nice on the new ones. Moreso than the bigger case size, what really kills the new one for me is the oversized hands and markers.. too cartoonish. But overall still a beautiful watch (I like the orange hand but also not crazy about the orange text). It's gone up about $500 since I bought it. On the one hand its nice to see it rise since I own one, on the other... I don't want Rolex prices to rise for obvious reasons. Great video as always, Teddy.
The older model is far more desirable in my opinion. The proportions are far more appealing than the big oversized features of the newer models. I love red gmt hand also, more elegant and classic.
i bought a "swiss" only 16570 (1999) last nov in japan. its a solid "investment" / buy. It is going up, but some countries i feel are still undervaluing this watch. For exp 2. its either 1655 or 16570. the new one is too big (even though bigger watches are supposedly in fashion)
Sir, you are the best, even though you are a young dude. I have worn Rolexes since 1968 and have 4 models. The only person more passionate than me about Rolex seems to be you. Keep it up with Rolex and certainly other watches.
16570 Hands down. It is more classic-looking and is a little more wearable as an everyday watch as well as a dressy watch whereas the orange stands out as not quite as classy.
I bought both 16570 and 226570. One in black one in white. The 16570 is great for understated everyday wear without the bracelet (I put that on a Rubber B strap, original bracelet is not great when compared to modern ones), and the 226570 is surprisingly great to wear with the bracelet.
Don’t know why people are obsessed with the white dial. I tried on the black dial and fell in love . I have to admit that I did not see the white dial in person . Curious whether anyone saw both side by side ?
Good review. The 216570 has a great balance in appearance especially because it is relatively thin compared to a lot of 42mm watches. The larger hands (largest in the Rolex line BTW) also give it a unique, almost cartoonish, look. I added a black Rubber B strap with the thin orange stripe and the watch becomes a fantastic "modern" interpretation of what a Rolex is today.
I just watched this video again and boy do I wish the 40m was still available for $5500-$7000, and even the new one in the $8k range. Amazing how fast that price jump was in 2 years. The old one is now more expensive than the new one was 2 years ago!
Great video, very good information on both watches. I prefer the 16570. It was my first luxury watch. It can be used in any occasion. When my collection grew it became my outdoors watch.
I own the 216 and am amazed how comfortable it is. It very rarely comes off my wrist as I don’t notice it’s there. With the sun shining at an angle on the watch it’s incredible how much “pop” there is to the watch with every detail showing. The lume even shows up during the day if it faces the sun for more than 10 sec. Mine holds right at the +2 sec per day; considering taking it to the AD to have it regulated closer to zero. Overall very pleased with the watch.
I bought a 16570 new in ‘96. Literally wore it 24/7 as my only watch until ~2010 (when I started buying more watches, then it was a regular watch in rotation). I wore it swimming in ocean many times, beach, hot tubs, showers, hiking, gym…everywhere all the time. After ~25 years of flawless operation and excellent time keeping I got it serviced and they replaced the chipped crystal, I refused polishing (I wasn’t easy on this watch!). It is gorgeous still with all of its patina scratches and little dings. Amazing watch and IMO the size and relative dimensions are far superior to that of the 216570. I’ll never sell it. My sons will inherit it.
Informative video, I recently purchased the 226570 in polar and black versions because I couldn't decide, I honestly find the black better but they both are excellent tool/sport watches for me with amazing built quality and specs.
Recently picked up the Explorer II 16570 version 3 and love this for an everyday wear and something I'm not thinking about when wearing. Price point on these are great, I would say mine is new/ used and picked up for $6,250 which is great for todays market.
16570 would be my choice. The overall aesthetics just work so muvh better than the over bulked case and indecies of the newer version. Thanks for the video teddy 🙏
Don't forget about the white dialed turn-o-graph. It is unmistakably a sports watch, considering that it was the first Rolex designed with a rotatable bezel.
I've recently purchased the 2021 226570 Polar and do love this watch. I also own a 2019 Date Submariner and I agree with you on the size. My wrist is slightly over 7 inches but would rather see the Explorer II at 40mm. With that said I'm still very happy with my 226570. Great video on both watches 👏👍
Great comparison. I’m a huge fan of the Explorer II Polar. My 16570 has the lug holes. I prefer the 24 hand of the 16570. Bought it used 20+ years ago and swapped out the Tritium with a Super Luminova face and hands. Had to replace the mainspring but it has been a workhorse.
I generally like larger watches, but I think stylistically the 16570 is a much better looking watch. I also really can’t stand the ugly orange GMT hand. However with that being said, the clasp on the newer models really kills the old thin crappy pressed metal clasp.
I agree with the 16570. Don't mind the orange hand too much, would like them to sample with it in the future. The bracelet, yeah, 216570 no doubt. Thanks for watching buddy!
my dream polar explorer would be the 16570 with an orange GMT hand. I like the new iterations but don't think the polar dial works anywhere near as well. Looking forward to seeing what they do for the 50th anniversary next year
Having a larger wrist I’m drawn to the 216570. I even like the black dial almost as much as the white dial. If there was a significant savings with the black dial, I’d grab it in a heart beat. GREAT video, Teddy!
My favourite is my Y series 16570 black dial. It’s become an absolute go-to piece, alongside Snowflake and Speedie. You can really see how fat the new ones are when you put them side by side, I was actually fishing for a Polar dial, but found this one and decided to take a punt. So glad I did, the black dial just seems more understated and versatile, it can be worn with almost anything. Still love the polar dial, tho. Congrats on yours Teddy, and great video.
So Underrated, that I'm in the waiting list for over a year now with a good history at that AD. For the black dial to be precise. That Rolex situation is totally absurde.
It’s obvious which model I prefer, I bought the 216570 Polar in last august from my AD here in Sweden. For me was this model perfect, because it’s a 42mm size. That size is my sweet spot! Also, I love the orange GMT hand, it just pops and looks so cool! I think both will be future classics, there will be a Big demand on both! Rolex gonna support a Big marketing of these two, there for will the price increase. Here in Sweden the price increased with 13% on january 1st. (Retailprice) Thanks Teddy for a great comparison!!👌🏻🤩
Sent my 16570 back for refurb. Got it back and so very good! The Polar is a classic. I just don’t need/want the large nautical gauge on my wrist…doesn’t fit comfortably under a long sleeve shirt/jacket.
I bought a blackface 16570 new back in 2002 for about $3700. It's been a good watch that I wear every day. I do need to send it back to Rolex to have the dial relumed, the movement refined and the case polished.
Thanks for the review Teddy - 16570 is the pick in polar white - would go the same choice as you, proportions are better and love the more traditional vintage vibe
6’4 250 7.5 wrist…I actually like 40mm watches in most cases but the 42mm GMT II looks great and it’s more of a weekend watch so the slightly bigger proportions work as I live in SWFL and it’s shorts and Polo/T Shirts all the time…Polar White is the way to go ….it goes with everything and stands out in a unique way..love it..
I have the new Orange hand and polar dial 226570, it's my first Rolex as part of a milestone in my life and I just love it, I didn't had the luxury of trying both on my wrist, but I'd say this... My Explorer 2 is the biggest watch I've bought (Including my Garmin 7S 42mm which is the same), and all the future watches will be smaller. Funny thing is that for a number of years I've set my mind to this watch, and looked at other Rolex watches and decided I'm not a Rolex guy with a bunch of Rolex watches, buuut... now, having the Explorer 2 it suddenly opens the door to take a look at maybe 2 other Rolex watches... it's just beautiful. From afar it's sounds tacky a Rolex watch, but when you own one and see the craftmanship, and then the Rolex crown logo, it's a statement, it's bold it and it's special. For now the next watch is a dress watch and I have a pretty good idea which one, either a JLC rose gold ultra thin moon phase, or a JLC reverso . Both will eventually end in my collection, but which comes first is for the future to unfold. As for the other Rolex watches I'm looking at, is of course the Submariner, and a datejust fluted bezel on a jubilee bracelet with a blue dial. The gate has been opened and I became a watch enthousiast, possibly a Rolex enthousiast too.
Love my 42, as I have a 7 3/4 inch. Wasn’t sure about the orange hand but... the most legible Rolex by day and movement and Chromalight make this one the winner over the 40.
The 42 polar explorer is awesome. The fit/finish is noticeably better. I also had the 40 on my wrist recently but really appreciate the 42 more. If your wrist is under 7” you may like the smaller model.
I had the opportunity to compare these models side by side and I found the new model too big and sat quite proud on the wrist, even more so than the Speedy Pro. So happy i bought the old model, beautiful and sits perfectly on the wrist and can be worn with a t shirt or a tuxedo
I have owned both - and I prefer the dial on the 16570 - the orange hand and text on the 42mm looks slightly off. I had hoped they would change the text and GMT hand to green for the 50th upgrade. Perfect combo for me would be the older 16570 dial with the same proportions and narrower lugs of the new 41mm submariner.
Teddy, I have a question for you and other proud Explorer II owners. And let me say I have never seen seen or handled an Explorer II in person, hence this question: Can you use the second-timezone hand as a countdown-timer. For example, if I wanted to perform a countdown of 3 hours and 15 minutes. Could I set the second-timezone hand at around 20:45 and monitor it as it worked it's way up to the noon midnight position? I know that the second-timezone hand is set independently but I I was not sure if the minute hand governed part of the positioning of the second-timezone hand. I hope this question is clear. If not, feel free to troll me. Thanks!
It wouldn't be any good for what you described. You'd be better off with a dive watch for that. The GMT hand is set exactly one hour (or multiples of one hour) behind the hour hand.
I absolutely love my Explorer II. I have a 16570 on right now. It has a black dial and is PVD with a nice dark titanium color. Absolutely my favorite Rolex I own, and the one I wear the most. I have a new orange RubberB strap for it coming tomorrow!
The black dial will gain more popularity when more people realize it has the phantom dial hands. The white dial looks nicer, but the black dial is the one you should invest in. Edit: I'm talking about the 216570 of course. Also my very first Rolex I bought early January. First one of 2020 :D
Dude, no matter what. You need to service the watch eventually From what I hear, a basic Rolex service is $500. They re-grease the gears and change the gaskets. The orange GMT hand on the 216570 is what makes this watch ageless. This watch goes great on NATO straps, leather bands, and the stock oysterband. The black Steve McQueen Rolex Explorer 2 just looks great on oysterband.
Fair review on both models but if you’re buying the biggest consideration in my opinion is the bracelet, the older model has a very tinny clasp, has poor adjustment and could have an extra decade of use and consequent stretch and sag. I’ve had both and bought the 2 for same money as the 1. So, IMO the 2 is the better buy
This watch is underrated. I Own the Rolex Explorer 2 42m Polar White is perfect and great size. Not many white dails in the Rolex Sports range. If your thinking buying Explorer 2 I Highly Recommend The Explorer 42m black or Polar white.
My preference is definitely 42mm white case ,bar none, BEAUTIFUL. I'M a big dude w/ 9" plus wrist, I'm going to buy a 42mm ASAP, Fell In love with this masterpiece !!!
I would love the 16570 case size with the orange gmt hand and orange text but the 16570 by itself is still fine. Definitely would choose the 16570 but sucks to see the 16570 approach or even surpass in some cases the full retail price of the regular production Explorer II
So I have a white dial 42mm 216570 and a Black-out custom 42mm 216570. And it comes down to the orange 🍊 I am still trying to find that 1655 with a perfect dial and set of hands that is inside my budget. And a 16550 is on my list, but again price dependent. For me the Red GMT should not have made an appearance, and glad they re introduced the orange hand. What I would love to see is the 42mm format with an upgraded movement and a rail track dial. That would be a killer. Made my comment 2 min so now that I watched your summary I think you are spot on.
I have a 16570, for me the sizing is perfect, 42mm is just pushing it for me. Was my first Rolex and can't see it ever leaving the collection, unless bad things happen and I need to sell it for food.
Game. The best franken-Explorer II to me has: 16570 40 mm case and bezel, black dial, big red arrow "freccione" GMT hand, latest oyster bracelet with glidelock.
Good reviews and comparisons. Keep up the good work. I'm 6'2" 240lbs. The 16570 just looked small on me, or made me look bigger than I am. Take your pick. Having said that, I love my black face 216570 my wife got for me in 2011.
My first Rolex was a oyster perpetual with aribec numbers,I bought it from Bob's watchs.The 216570 is my next Rolex sometime this year.I also like the yacht master 2
Honestly if I were to buy a Rolex today, it would be the Explorer II, 100%. Love the white dial with the orange GMT hand popping.
AGREE!
The Rolex hand is 🔥
Nailed it
Bought one yesterday. Love it
The red hand makes it look anaemic, unhealthy, the orange is life
The 16750 has always been my favorite Rolex, hands down!
I bought my polar one brand new in 2003 and I still love it!
It was hard for me to decide between the polar and the black..., I end up buying a black one two and they are my 2 favorite watches in my 10 watch collection!
I would not change them for any other Rolex model.
Totally understand this. I have the Polar. Love it. Looking for the black.
Love the 16570 - 40mm red GMT hand, it is just unique and has become an iconic classic and the fact they are no longer continuing 40mm it will go up in value.
I was lucky enough to get one as a graduation gift in 2004.
Just got the 216570 on Wednesday of this week. It’s my first Rolex and I could not be happier with this purchase. I’m a bigger guy so the larger casing fits me nicely. I love that I can wear this at work with dress clothes and on weekends with jeans and a t-shirt. So glad you posted this video!! Keep up the great work!!
Congrats, wear it in good health. Love that fat orange GMT hand.
Thank you! Yes the GMT hand is mesmerizing. All the best!
It's a tool-watch, so one should use it appropriatly
And you’re the typical internet troll who has nothing better to do than read and post comments all day. At least I have a nice time piece at the end of the day!
Maybe you can ask Mommy for an increase in allowance so you try to afford one one day.
I bought a 16570 T in 2015 for $3150. I am a Land Rover guy who appreciates classic design. I put it in the safe until today and started looking into value. Holy crap...I should have bought three or four. I love that it does not look at all pretentious. Simple clean design. Thank you for a great video.
Absolutely the 216570.
I have nothing against smaller, mid-sized watches and think people should consider size when buying a watch, but I do get tired of reviewers with small wrists whining during every single review for a return to 1940-50s sized watches. I don't personally like "dinner plate" sized watches, neither do I buy them, but some people enjoy them. Surely we can allow for differences in taste and wrist sizes and the fact that many people like the availability of larger watches and that those modern watches look good on larger wrists and with current style.
A fedora looked great on Humphrey Bogart, but fedoras aren't appropriate in the 2020s.
youre telling me,,8,5 inch wrist here,,anything smaller than 45 looks like a ladies watch
yeah I got an 8 inch wrist and got a 216570 and it's anything BUT large. sad story is... brand new from AD, bezel is slightly misaligned to the right, and the minute indexes are touching the rehaut at the bottom... donno if I should have it corrected
@@pizza.doctor im with you..at over 8 inches myself those guys think we are freaks and we cant find any hot watches that actually look like a mans size on us, it would be great of they made nice ones that were between 48 and 52 mm
at 40 mm its a women/cuck size
Fedoras are never appropriate.... ha ha.... The 216570 is stunning in person.
Been itching to get an Explorer II for a while now. The 16570 just has a more classic size and IMO it is more timeless.
I agree as well when it comes to my personal tastes. Love the line though!
The early ones have tritium dials which age gloriously.
sunflash101 no thanks. it’s overall feel is way too tinny for my taste.
Which version of the 16570 is considered the most desirable apart from the earliest tritium version? In terms of lugs and movement?
Completely agree. The 216570 looks bloated and unbalanced, so happy with my ‘old’ Polar
Both references are really unique cool pieces. I opted with the 216570 polar and I love the orange 24h and also the orange lettering on the dial. You cant go wrong with either of these awesome watches.
Honoured to be mentioned by you Teddy. Thanks a million! The Explorer's are such hidden gems (understated, very un-rolex for the most part) I had a thought the other day about whether Tudor would ever consider reintroducing the 1655 aesthetic and made some mock-ups. And I fully agree that the modern Exp 2 should get a bit of a refresh (bringing the size down would be great for us skinny guys) maybe the introduction of a Ceramic bezel insert, but a Grey insert instead of Black. Maybe Basel 2020 will be the year of the Explorer?
crazy to read this 2 years later and now we got the BB Pro which is kinda a 1655
@@TMNT_Maniac_87 The Grand Seiko SBGM247 beats them both by miles.
@@ekimandersom4478no not really lol
@@kinnymane8593 In finishing, looks, price definitely!
@@ekimandersom4478 The sbgm247 is more expensive than the Tudor Bb pro. So you’re wrong there, you’re also wrong about the finishing. Looks is completely subjective, the only thing I’d really give you there is GS just has better dials all-around
My 16570 polar has recently been serviced, and is running +1 second after 6 weeks ... not per day, TOTAL. Not only that but it has been dropped once onto a wood floor from about 4' ... and I do basically everything in it. I love this watch so much. Good choice Teddy!
Had a 16570, now a 216570. Looking forward to the 50th anniversary model in 2021.
The orange 24 hour hand on the 216570 matching the “Explorer II” script is fantastic.
I have owned many watches, as I get older, style is important, but comfort is just as important. I always found larger watches to clunky and hard to get over a coat or shirt etc. The sweet spot for me, is the 39-40mm range. I own a few Rolex watches, and a 16570 is one I own. I like the watch a lot, no regrets. I couldn’t care a less, if others knowI wear a Rolex or not. Thanks for the video.
I like mine the best. It's the 16550 that I purchased in 1984 for less than 900 bucks. It has that beautiful (defective!) cream rail dial.
The almost Bond ⌚
I've got the newer 216570 black dial for a couple of years now. All I can tell you is that it is scary accurate! And it wears...unreal
The smaller cases are in my opinion more classic and aesthetic in proportion. Rolex should slim down its sports models again.
I agree completely.
No. Perhaps Rolex could take note of what Omega has done with their Planet Ocean line and offer multiple sizes. As I indicated in another comment, guys with larger wrists simply can’t wear 40mm watches without looking ridiculous. Just imagine a world with footwear available in only one size. Great idea, huh? 😁
@@VaiSolo You could just extend the bracelet ;) Nah I totally get you, I would have a thicker wrist by most standards but I do prefer the smaller watches 36mm-40mm is my comfort zone but the new Rolex case sizes wear much larger such as the 116610 vs 16610.
@@VaiSoloThere are very few wrists were 40mm looks too small. There is the majority of wrists where 42mm is too large.
@@rudimussrodelnAt this point, I’m so accustomed to a 44 mm Deepsea that I can’t even go back to a GMT Master - which really bothers me because it has always been my favorite all-around watch. In fact, I’m wearing a 50 mm Suunto right now just because it has so many useful functions, so anything around 40 mm definitely feels weird…
Just purchased the 16570, black dial, Super LumiNova, drilled lugs, and solid endlinks. Love the value. Under 10K the Rolex’s you’re limited to are primarily time only, or with date under 40mm (really mainly 36mm and under). At 39mm you’re literally only getting time only. So to get a Rolex with complications, with the Rolex classics (Mercedes hands, magnified date), while still being lowkey, it’s just amazing.
I've waited for this video for a while! I'm buying a 16570 in a few weeks and this has been affirming to the choice I made :) Great content
I’ve owned a polar in both the 40mm and 42mm case size. Both are terrific watches. For me, at 73 the 42 is my choice. It’s easier on my eyes. Additionally, the 42 has a much better clasp.
What size wrist do you have, if you don't mind me asking?
If you plan to get 42mm i suggest to get the black version because 42 looks better in black.
If you fancy 16570 40mm get the polar (that is a must)
Trust me
I have a larger wrist than yours at 7.25”, so I’m comfortable wearing a 42mm watch. I would buy a new Explorer II either dial.
I like how you always show a proper wrist shot so people can get a idea how a watch might fit them. The 42mm didn’t look bad at all on your 6.25” wrist. You could wear either. I wasn’t thinking it would work for my 7” wrist but maybe it will after all
I like the thicker/orange GMT hand, and also love the orange type on the dial of 216570. I'd prefer the 40mm case, but would still pick the newest gen based on the use of the complementary orange, and the drastically improved oyster bracelet.
I couldn’t agree more, the polar dial is a total game changer. I own a 216570 myself and I love it. I’ve had every Rolex except a Daytona and air king and IMO it’s the best all around watch yet it stands out from the crowd.
Hey Ted, thanks again for another stellar review but this time on a timeless classic- the Rolex Explorer II. This watch is truly the embodiment of a "one watch collection" and the minor scratches on the case speak volumes to your immense appreciation and utility for the piece.
Thank you, Nicholas. I definitely have not babied the piece. Such a great watch.
If you like skiing, there is no other watch on the planet better than the Explorer II Polar. I got mine 15 years ago, feels great, I always keep it on when swimming
I also swim with mine! I was thinking, am I crazy? After Teddy mentioned maybe not to. I think as long as within a reasonable time of service or water resist test its fine.
I'm a 216570 owner. my father had a 16570 in his collection when I was in college and I always loved it. My first Rolex was a Stainless Sub. Then I made the jump to the Explorer II (216570) and have worn it day in and day out since 2013. Great everyday wear (just as Teddy said). I have a few other brands and they all get wrist time, but this is the go-to and I have a hard time reaching over it in the winder to grab something different. Great review!
I’m a 50 something curmudgeon but I think the older bracelets wear much more comfy. However I love the newer dial but wish they’d left it at 40. Rolex got into the 40+ game too late and is starting to look a little silly for it by 2022 here.
Really nice review, Teddy. Very professionally videoed too. I just bought my first polar Explorer II (circa 2011) last weekend and wore it on the slopes skiing-very cool look in the snow indeed. The red hour hand is its most stunning feature and unique compared to almost every other watch available, particularly striking in the current model. I actually really like the black dial version too as the hour markers highlights its distinctive 18ct gold finish that is not so apparent on the white dial, lending itself a more dressy appearance. It’s almost a different watch in that regard.
Was initially put off by the 216750 . Thought it looked clumsy and just didn’t appeal to me going by images online . Went to purchase the older model 16570 . Tried both on and to my surprise instantly fell in love with the 216570 black dial. The slim case makes the 42 size work perfectly. It hugs the wrist . Absolutely stunning . My advice try one on and like me you might be pleasantly surprised ! 👍🏻
here's what I think, the white dial is better in the 16570 while the black is better on the 216570/226570. The black 42mm helps the watch look a bit smaller while the white 42 looks large and I find the orange gmt hand works better with the black dial than the white, while the red gmt hand complements the white 16570 nicely.
Your previous 1 month review of the 16570 was the last straw- I ended up buying the exact same model last month! I can't seem to rotate it off my wrist. I follow the all-purpose ethos in almost everything I buy and this thing is the real deal. Basically a GMT Master II at a 30% discount and no "questions" .
I've got a tritium 16570 (1995) I bought about a year ago and I swim with it! I think as long as its within a reasonable time of service or pressure test its ok (I got it certified pre-owned, so serviced by RSC). I agree the 16570 takes the cake although the bracelet is so nice on the new ones. Moreso than the bigger case size, what really kills the new one for me is the oversized hands and markers.. too cartoonish. But overall still a beautiful watch (I like the orange hand but also not crazy about the orange text). It's gone up about $500 since I bought it. On the one hand its nice to see it rise since I own one, on the other... I don't want Rolex prices to rise for obvious reasons. Great video as always, Teddy.
I bought my 216570 brand new in July 2014. Worn it every day since then. It's just gone in for its first service and I miss it so much ........
The older model is far more desirable in my opinion. The proportions are far more appealing than the big oversized features of the newer models. I love red gmt hand also, more elegant and classic.
I love the look of the newer model, but the lug to lug length sizes potential buyers out of it.
Agreed! Especially the sweet spot transition models with engraved rehauts
i bought a "swiss" only 16570 (1999) last nov in japan. its a solid "investment" / buy. It is going up, but some countries i feel are still undervaluing this watch. For exp 2. its either 1655 or 16570. the new one is too big (even though bigger watches are supposedly in fashion)
Sir, you are the best, even though you are a young dude. I have worn Rolexes since 1968 and have 4 models. The only person more passionate than me about Rolex seems to be you. Keep it up with Rolex and certainly other watches.
There it is! To think I was just wondering what had happened to that comparison video 2 weeks ago, yet you were already making it. Thanks, Teddy.
Haha it took a while to get this one done. I am usually working on several videos at once. Thanks for being patient and watching Jasper!
I see you have a new review format. Nice Teddy! Beautiful video
Thank you my friend! 🙌🏻🙌🏻
This video was super helpful. Just bought a 16570 F series a couple weeks ago for my 25th anniversary. First real watch. So happy.
16570 Hands down. It is more classic-looking and is a little more wearable as an everyday watch as well as a dressy watch whereas the orange stands out as not quite as classy.
Hands DOWN. I’d like the new one if it was still 40mm
I bought both 16570 and 226570. One in black one in white. The 16570 is great for understated everyday wear without the bracelet (I put that on a Rubber B strap, original bracelet is not great when compared to modern ones), and the 226570 is surprisingly great to wear with the bracelet.
Don’t know why people are obsessed with the white dial. I tried on the black dial and fell in love . I have to admit that I did not see the white dial in person . Curious whether anyone saw both side by side ?
Good review. The 216570 has a great balance in appearance especially because it is relatively thin compared to a lot of 42mm watches. The larger hands (largest in the Rolex line BTW) also give it a unique, almost cartoonish, look. I added a black Rubber B strap with the thin orange stripe and the watch becomes a fantastic "modern" interpretation of what a Rolex is today.
I bought the 16570 Polar and 216570 Black and I love them both for different reasons! Cheers
The 40mm polar is amazing, the white dial is so flexible it works in every situation! But the best is one with the "ivory / cream" dial.
I just watched this video again and boy do I wish the 40m was still available for $5500-$7000, and even the new one in the $8k range. Amazing how fast that price jump was in 2 years. The old one is now more expensive than the new one was 2 years ago!
Great video, very good information on both watches. I prefer the 16570. It was my first luxury watch. It can be used in any occasion. When my collection grew it became my outdoors watch.
Bruce The Shark ,,, way to go the intended porpoise of the tool watch
I own the 216 and am amazed how comfortable it is. It very rarely comes off my wrist as I don’t notice it’s there. With the sun shining at an angle on the watch it’s incredible how much “pop” there is to the watch with every detail showing. The lume even shows up during the day if it faces the sun for more than 10 sec. Mine holds right at the +2 sec per day; considering taking it to the AD to have it regulated closer to zero. Overall very pleased with the watch.
I bought a 16570 new in ‘96. Literally wore it 24/7 as my only watch until ~2010 (when I started buying more watches, then it was a regular watch in rotation).
I wore it swimming in ocean many times, beach, hot tubs, showers, hiking, gym…everywhere all the time. After ~25 years of flawless operation and excellent time keeping I got it serviced and they replaced the chipped crystal, I refused polishing (I wasn’t easy on this watch!). It is gorgeous still with all of its patina scratches and little dings.
Amazing watch and IMO the size and relative dimensions are far superior to that of the 216570.
I’ll never sell it. My sons will inherit it.
Informative video, I recently purchased the 226570 in polar and black versions because I couldn't decide, I honestly find the black better but they both are excellent tool/sport watches for me with amazing built quality and specs.
Fantastic comparison Teddy. I love both of these polar dials. I love the white dial with the black surrounds. Thank you for another awesome video :)
Recently picked up the Explorer II 16570 version 3 and love this for an everyday wear and something I'm not thinking about when wearing. Price point on these are great, I would say mine is new/ used and picked up for $6,250 which is great for todays market.
16570 would be my choice. The overall aesthetics just work so muvh better than the over bulked case and indecies of the newer version. Thanks for the video teddy 🙏
Don't forget about the white dialed turn-o-graph. It is unmistakably a sports watch, considering that it was the first Rolex designed with a rotatable bezel.
I've recently purchased the 2021 226570 Polar and do love this watch. I also own a 2019 Date Submariner and I agree with you on the size. My wrist is slightly over 7 inches but would rather see the Explorer II at 40mm. With that said I'm still very happy with my 226570. Great video on both watches 👏👍
16570 40mm SEL bracelet with lug holes and upgraded 3186 movement-simply the best. Nice one, Arch.
Great comparison. I’m a huge fan of the Explorer II Polar. My 16570 has the lug holes. I prefer the 24 hand of the 16570. Bought it used 20+ years ago and swapped out the Tritium with a Super Luminova face and hands. Had to replace the mainspring but it has been a workhorse.
The ref. 16550 are pretty awesome since the patina on them are strong; a 16550 with a cream dial and a brown leather strap.. boom.
Have to admit, the patina on those dials and the tritium markers is awesome.
I generally like larger watches, but I think stylistically the 16570 is a much better looking watch. I also really can’t stand the ugly orange GMT hand. However with that being said, the clasp on the newer models really kills the old thin crappy pressed metal clasp.
I agree with the 16570. Don't mind the orange hand too much, would like them to sample with it in the future. The bracelet, yeah, 216570 no doubt. Thanks for watching buddy!
my dream polar explorer would be the 16570 with an orange GMT hand. I like the new iterations but don't think the polar dial works anywhere near as well. Looking forward to seeing what they do for the 50th anniversary next year
I hate orange! I’d be fine with a 42 if it had red hands. This is why I own the 40
Having a larger wrist I’m drawn to the 216570. I even like the black dial almost as much as the white dial. If there was a significant savings with the black dial, I’d grab it in a heart beat. GREAT video, Teddy!
Thanks my friend! I think the black dial 216570 is much more appealing than that of the 16570. The orange hand helps it pop a bit more.
My favourite is my Y series 16570 black dial. It’s become an absolute go-to piece, alongside Snowflake and Speedie. You can really see how fat the new ones are when you put them side by side, I was actually fishing for a Polar dial, but found this one and decided to take a punt. So glad I did, the black dial just seems more understated and versatile, it can be worn with almost anything. Still love the polar dial, tho. Congrats on yours Teddy, and great video.
Definitely underrated
Agreed. Starting to get more love as of late though.
So Underrated, that I'm in the waiting list for over a year now with a good history at that AD. For the black dial to be precise. That Rolex situation is totally absurde.
It’s obvious which model I prefer, I bought the 216570 Polar in last august from my AD here in Sweden. For me was this model perfect, because it’s a 42mm size. That size is my sweet spot! Also, I love the orange GMT hand, it just pops and looks so cool! I think both will be future classics, there will be a Big demand on both! Rolex gonna support a Big marketing of these two, there for will the price increase. Here in Sweden the price increased with 13% on january 1st. (Retailprice) Thanks Teddy for a great comparison!!👌🏻🤩
Sent my 16570 back for refurb. Got it back and so very good! The Polar is a classic. I just don’t need/want the large nautical gauge on my wrist…doesn’t fit comfortably under a long sleeve shirt/jacket.
I love the small scratches on the case, well-worn teddy, well-worn
They are made to be worn after all. I don't baby my watches.
Used but not abused
I bought a blackface 16570 new back in 2002 for about $3700. It's been a good watch that I wear every day. I do need to send it back to Rolex to have the dial relumed, the movement refined and the case polished.
Thanks for the review Teddy - 16570 is the pick in polar white - would go the same choice as you, proportions are better and love the more traditional vintage vibe
"Yeah, I'm kinda pathetic... I have problems..." I think you speak for all of us in the watch community haha
6’4 250 7.5 wrist…I actually like 40mm watches in most cases but the 42mm GMT II looks great and it’s more of a weekend watch so the slightly bigger proportions work as I live in SWFL and it’s shorts and Polo/T Shirts all the time…Polar White is the way to go ….it goes with everything and stands out in a unique way..love it..
I have the 216570 Black. The reason I got it is because of the phantom hands homage to the 1655.
I have the new Orange hand and polar dial 226570, it's my first Rolex as part of a milestone in my life and I just love it, I didn't had the luxury of trying both on my wrist, but I'd say this...
My Explorer 2 is the biggest watch I've bought (Including my Garmin 7S 42mm which is the same), and all the future watches will be smaller.
Funny thing is that for a number of years I've set my mind to this watch, and looked at other Rolex watches and decided I'm not a Rolex guy with a bunch of Rolex watches,
buuut... now, having the Explorer 2 it suddenly opens the door to take a look at maybe 2 other Rolex watches... it's just beautiful. From afar it's sounds tacky a Rolex watch, but when you own one and see the craftmanship, and then the Rolex crown logo, it's a statement, it's bold it and it's special.
For now the next watch is a dress watch and I have a pretty good idea which one, either a JLC rose gold ultra thin moon phase, or a JLC reverso . Both will eventually end in my collection, but which comes first is for the future to unfold.
As for the other Rolex watches I'm looking at, is of course the Submariner, and a datejust fluted bezel on a jubilee bracelet with a blue dial.
The gate has been opened and I became a watch enthousiast, possibly a Rolex enthousiast too.
Love my 42, as I have a 7 3/4 inch. Wasn’t sure about the orange hand but... the most legible Rolex by day and movement and Chromalight make this one the winner over the 40.
The 42 polar explorer is awesome. The fit/finish is noticeably better. I also had the 40 on my wrist recently but really appreciate the 42 more. If your wrist is under 7” you may like the smaller model.
Right, I love the newer one more (not $5k+ more)
But it's a little too large for my wrist
I had the opportunity to compare these models side by side and I found the new model too big and sat quite proud on the wrist, even more so than the Speedy Pro. So happy i bought the old model, beautiful and sits perfectly on the wrist and can be worn with a t shirt or a tuxedo
I have owned both - and I prefer the dial on the 16570 - the orange hand and text on the 42mm looks slightly off. I had hoped they would change the text and GMT hand to green for the 50th upgrade. Perfect combo for me would be the older 16570 dial with the same proportions and narrower lugs of the new 41mm submariner.
Just picked up my 216570 polar :) verry happy with it looking great next to my SD43. Nice vids mate
Teddy, I have a question for you and other proud Explorer II owners. And let me say I have never seen seen or handled an Explorer II in person, hence this question: Can you use the second-timezone hand as a countdown-timer. For example, if I wanted to perform a countdown of 3 hours and 15 minutes. Could I set the second-timezone hand at around 20:45 and monitor it as it worked it's way up to the noon midnight position? I know that the second-timezone hand is set independently but I I was not sure if the minute hand governed part of the positioning of the second-timezone hand. I hope this question is clear. If not, feel free to troll me. Thanks!
It wouldn't be any good for what you described. You'd be better off with a dive watch for that. The GMT hand is set exactly one hour (or multiples of one hour) behind the hour hand.
New one. Black dial b/c it’s less loved and it’s an homage to the original fleccione.
Exactly
Freccione, not Fleccione
I absolutely love my Explorer II. I have a 16570 on right now. It has a black dial and is PVD with a nice dark titanium color. Absolutely my favorite Rolex I own, and the one I wear the most. I have a new orange RubberB strap for it coming tomorrow!
After spending 2 weeks with my Explorer II I am even more in love with it. The RubberB strap looks insane on it and I love it more and more every day.
Love my 16570 Z serial, got as my first luxury watch for my birthday. So versatile and quiet but also an awesome sports watch for daily use!
The black dial will gain more popularity when more people realize it has the phantom dial hands. The white dial looks nicer, but the black dial is the one you should invest in.
Edit: I'm talking about the 216570 of course. Also my very first Rolex I bought early January. First one of 2020 :D
Dude, no matter what. You need to service the watch eventually From what I hear, a basic Rolex service is $500. They re-grease the gears and change the gaskets. The orange GMT hand on the 216570 is what makes this watch ageless. This watch goes great on NATO straps, leather bands, and the stock oysterband. The black Steve McQueen Rolex Explorer 2 just looks great on oysterband.
I’m an explorer 1 guy. My daily watch is a 14270. The 16570 is lovely though. Much prefer the red
I have a gmt Batman and the polar explorer 2 . No one notices the gmt and everyone notices the explorer
Fair review on both models but if you’re buying the biggest consideration in my opinion is the bracelet, the older model has a very tinny clasp, has poor adjustment and could have an extra decade of use and consequent stretch and sag. I’ve had both and bought the 2 for same money as the 1. So, IMO the 2 is the better buy
This watch is underrated.
I Own the Rolex Explorer 2 42m Polar White is perfect and great size. Not many white dails in the Rolex Sports range. If your thinking buying Explorer 2 I Highly Recommend The Explorer 42m black or Polar white.
My preference is definitely 42mm
white case ,bar none, BEAUTIFUL. I'M a big dude w/ 9" plus wrist, I'm going to buy a 42mm ASAP, Fell In love with this masterpiece !!!
I purchased the 216570 in December. I’ve since put a RubberB orange strap on it and couldn’t be happier! Love it more than my brand new 124060
Enjoyed your video and analysis. This will probably be my first Rolex. The white dial and orange detail are stunning.
I love the milgauss it's so frickin cooolll
make a new video with the 2021 explorer
I would love the 16570 case size with the orange gmt hand and orange text but the 16570 by itself is still fine. Definitely would choose the 16570 but sucks to see the 16570 approach or even surpass in some cases the full retail price of the regular production Explorer II
They might bring back the 40mm like they did with the 36mm Explorer.
Teddy: Theres a also Polar white option for the newer steel Datejust 41. Also a beautiful face. Grabbed one of those last year.
So I have a white dial 42mm 216570 and a Black-out custom 42mm 216570. And it comes down to the orange 🍊 I am still trying to find that 1655 with a perfect dial and set of hands that is inside my budget. And a 16550 is on my list, but again price dependent. For me the Red GMT should not have made an appearance, and glad they re introduced the orange hand. What I would love to see is the 42mm format with an upgraded movement and a rail track dial. That would be a killer.
Made my comment 2 min so now that I watched your summary I think you are spot on.
I have a 16570, for me the sizing is perfect, 42mm is just pushing it for me. Was my first Rolex and can't see it ever leaving the collection, unless bad things happen and I need to sell it for food.
Game.
The best franken-Explorer II to me has:
16570 40 mm case and bezel, black dial, big red arrow "freccione" GMT hand, latest oyster bracelet with glidelock.
That would be interesting to see a mock-up of actually!
I just bought the 216570 polar. So far I enjoy it quite a bit.
The 16570 polar white dial ticks all the boxes for me. The vintage proportion and reliable movement just does it.
Good reviews and comparisons. Keep up the good work.
I'm 6'2" 240lbs. The 16570 just looked small on me, or made me look bigger than I am. Take your pick. Having said that, I love my black face 216570 my wife got for me in 2011.
My first Rolex was a oyster perpetual with aribec numbers,I bought it from Bob's watchs.The 216570 is my next Rolex sometime this year.I also like the yacht master 2