I bought a 16570 T in 2015 for $3150. I am a Land Rover guy who appreciates classic design. I put it in the safe until today and started looking into value. Holy crap...I should have bought three or four. I love that it does not look at all pretentious. Simple clean design. Thank you for a great video.
Both references are really unique cool pieces. I opted with the 216570 polar and I love the orange 24h and also the orange lettering on the dial. You cant go wrong with either of these awesome watches.
Just got the 216570 on Wednesday of this week. It’s my first Rolex and I could not be happier with this purchase. I’m a bigger guy so the larger casing fits me nicely. I love that I can wear this at work with dress clothes and on weekends with jeans and a t-shirt. So glad you posted this video!! Keep up the great work!!
And you’re the typical internet troll who has nothing better to do than read and post comments all day. At least I have a nice time piece at the end of the day!
Love the 16570 - 40mm red GMT hand, it is just unique and has become an iconic classic and the fact they are no longer continuing 40mm it will go up in value.
Had a 16570, now a 216570. Looking forward to the 50th anniversary model in 2021. The orange 24 hour hand on the 216570 matching the “Explorer II” script is fantastic.
The 16750 has always been my favorite Rolex, hands down! I bought my polar one brand new in 2003 and I still love it! It was hard for me to decide between the polar and the black..., I end up buying a black one two and they are my 2 favorite watches in my 10 watch collection! I would not change them for any other Rolex model.
Really nice review, Teddy. Very professionally videoed too. I just bought my first polar Explorer II (circa 2011) last weekend and wore it on the slopes skiing-very cool look in the snow indeed. The red hour hand is its most stunning feature and unique compared to almost every other watch available, particularly striking in the current model. I actually really like the black dial version too as the hour markers highlights its distinctive 18ct gold finish that is not so apparent on the white dial, lending itself a more dressy appearance. It’s almost a different watch in that regard.
No. Perhaps Rolex could take note of what Omega has done with their Planet Ocean line and offer multiple sizes. As I indicated in another comment, guys with larger wrists simply can’t wear 40mm watches without looking ridiculous. Just imagine a world with footwear available in only one size. Great idea, huh? 😁
@@VaiSolo You could just extend the bracelet ;) Nah I totally get you, I would have a thicker wrist by most standards but I do prefer the smaller watches 36mm-40mm is my comfort zone but the new Rolex case sizes wear much larger such as the 116610 vs 16610.
Honoured to be mentioned by you Teddy. Thanks a million! The Explorer's are such hidden gems (understated, very un-rolex for the most part) I had a thought the other day about whether Tudor would ever consider reintroducing the 1655 aesthetic and made some mock-ups. And I fully agree that the modern Exp 2 should get a bit of a refresh (bringing the size down would be great for us skinny guys) maybe the introduction of a Ceramic bezel insert, but a Grey insert instead of Black. Maybe Basel 2020 will be the year of the Explorer?
@@ekimandersom4478 The sbgm247 is more expensive than the Tudor Bb pro. So you’re wrong there, you’re also wrong about the finishing. Looks is completely subjective, the only thing I’d really give you there is GS just has better dials all-around
Absolutely the 216570. I have nothing against smaller, mid-sized watches and think people should consider size when buying a watch, but I do get tired of reviewers with small wrists whining during every single review for a return to 1940-50s sized watches. I don't personally like "dinner plate" sized watches, neither do I buy them, but some people enjoy them. Surely we can allow for differences in taste and wrist sizes and the fact that many people like the availability of larger watches and that those modern watches look good on larger wrists and with current style. A fedora looked great on Humphrey Bogart, but fedoras aren't appropriate in the 2020s.
yeah I got an 8 inch wrist and got a 216570 and it's anything BUT large. sad story is... brand new from AD, bezel is slightly misaligned to the right, and the minute indexes are touching the rehaut at the bottom... donno if I should have it corrected
@@pizza.doctor im with you..at over 8 inches myself those guys think we are freaks and we cant find any hot watches that actually look like a mans size on us, it would be great of they made nice ones that were between 48 and 52 mm
I like how you always show a proper wrist shot so people can get a idea how a watch might fit them. The 42mm didn’t look bad at all on your 6.25” wrist. You could wear either. I wasn’t thinking it would work for my 7” wrist but maybe it will after all
My 16570 polar has recently been serviced, and is running +1 second after 6 weeks ... not per day, TOTAL. Not only that but it has been dropped once onto a wood floor from about 4' ... and I do basically everything in it. I love this watch so much. Good choice Teddy!
I'm a 216570 owner. my father had a 16570 in his collection when I was in college and I always loved it. My first Rolex was a Stainless Sub. Then I made the jump to the Explorer II (216570) and have worn it day in and day out since 2013. Great everyday wear (just as Teddy said). I have a few other brands and they all get wrist time, but this is the go-to and I have a hard time reaching over it in the winder to grab something different. Great review!
Good review. The 216570 has a great balance in appearance especially because it is relatively thin compared to a lot of 42mm watches. The larger hands (largest in the Rolex line BTW) also give it a unique, almost cartoonish, look. I added a black Rubber B strap with the thin orange stripe and the watch becomes a fantastic "modern" interpretation of what a Rolex is today.
I have owned many watches, as I get older, style is important, but comfort is just as important. I always found larger watches to clunky and hard to get over a coat or shirt etc. The sweet spot for me, is the 39-40mm range. I own a few Rolex watches, and a 16570 is one I own. I like the watch a lot, no regrets. I couldn’t care a less, if others knowI wear a Rolex or not. Thanks for the video.
I like the thicker/orange GMT hand, and also love the orange type on the dial of 216570. I'd prefer the 40mm case, but would still pick the newest gen based on the use of the complementary orange, and the drastically improved oyster bracelet.
Your previous 1 month review of the 16570 was the last straw- I ended up buying the exact same model last month! I can't seem to rotate it off my wrist. I follow the all-purpose ethos in almost everything I buy and this thing is the real deal. Basically a GMT Master II at a 30% discount and no "questions" .
Hey Ted, thanks again for another stellar review but this time on a timeless classic- the Rolex Explorer II. This watch is truly the embodiment of a "one watch collection" and the minor scratches on the case speak volumes to your immense appreciation and utility for the piece.
I own the 216 and am amazed how comfortable it is. It very rarely comes off my wrist as I don’t notice it’s there. With the sun shining at an angle on the watch it’s incredible how much “pop” there is to the watch with every detail showing. The lume even shows up during the day if it faces the sun for more than 10 sec. Mine holds right at the +2 sec per day; considering taking it to the AD to have it regulated closer to zero. Overall very pleased with the watch.
If you like skiing, there is no other watch on the planet better than the Explorer II Polar. I got mine 15 years ago, feels great, I always keep it on when swimming
I also swim with mine! I was thinking, am I crazy? After Teddy mentioned maybe not to. I think as long as within a reasonable time of service or water resist test its fine.
I couldn’t agree more, the polar dial is a total game changer. I own a 216570 myself and I love it. I’ve had every Rolex except a Daytona and air king and IMO it’s the best all around watch yet it stands out from the crowd.
I just watched this video again and boy do I wish the 40m was still available for $5500-$7000, and even the new one in the $8k range. Amazing how fast that price jump was in 2 years. The old one is now more expensive than the new one was 2 years ago!
Just purchased the 16570, black dial, Super LumiNova, drilled lugs, and solid endlinks. Love the value. Under 10K the Rolex’s you’re limited to are primarily time only, or with date under 40mm (really mainly 36mm and under). At 39mm you’re literally only getting time only. So to get a Rolex with complications, with the Rolex classics (Mercedes hands, magnified date), while still being lowkey, it’s just amazing.
Excellent video Teddy - may I say that I think the production has come along very well - best photography/production from you I can remember and the sound has come a long way. I own the bigger one - I wanted to get one of the smaller ones originally but they were impossible to find in London for relsale let alone an AD. Took a while to even find the bigger one but I found one and bought one - always comes to Asia and USA with me. Tried a smaller one in Mumbai wrapped in plastic but I don't see myself getting more than one GMT as I feel it would be redundant. I really enjoyed the video! Just don't flog anyone some fake ass watches LOL Have a good one
Great video, thanks for posting! Looking to purchase one of these soon. It would be helpful if you could put the model numbers in the pic when you show the visual comparison such as in frame 13:39. Which model is which? You can figure it out but not after stopping replaying a few times....Truly appreciate the video, it was super helpful
Great comparison. I’m a huge fan of the Explorer II Polar. My 16570 has the lug holes. I prefer the 24 hand of the 16570. Bought it used 20+ years ago and swapped out the Tritium with a Super Luminova face and hands. Had to replace the mainspring but it has been a workhorse.
Don't forget about the white dialed turn-o-graph. It is unmistakably a sports watch, considering that it was the first Rolex designed with a rotatable bezel.
I’m a 50 something curmudgeon but I think the older bracelets wear much more comfy. However I love the newer dial but wish they’d left it at 40. Rolex got into the 40+ game too late and is starting to look a little silly for it by 2022 here.
great video 👍. I have been wearing the explorer 2 polar .. I love the aesthetics ans the presence on the wrist and not once I felt it’s too big . and absolutely don’t feel the need to get older reference . in my Peronist opinion . absolute keeper . cheers
Informative video, I recently purchased the 226570 in polar and black versions because I couldn't decide, I honestly find the black better but they both are excellent tool/sport watches for me with amazing built quality and specs.
TB… another terrific video!! Are there any rumors or street intel about Rolex offering a 40mm (or 36/38mm) Explorer II in the near future?? I’m waiting!
Hi there, I am a fan of your channel. :) I was wondering if you can do up a video on which watch brands that aren't worth the money? Be it a brand new piece at recommended retail/ sticker price or brands that simply use the basic ETA movement and then charges way beyond what's the watch is worth? Hear from you soon! Regards Kelvin (Singapore)
I've recently purchased the 2021 226570 Polar and do love this watch. I also own a 2019 Date Submariner and I agree with you on the size. My wrist is slightly over 7 inches but would rather see the Explorer II at 40mm. With that said I'm still very happy with my 226570. Great video on both watches 👏👍
16570 would be my choice. The overall aesthetics just work so muvh better than the over bulked case and indecies of the newer version. Thanks for the video teddy 🙏
I've got a tritium 16570 (1995) I bought about a year ago and I swim with it! I think as long as its within a reasonable time of service or pressure test its ok (I got it certified pre-owned, so serviced by RSC). I agree the 16570 takes the cake although the bracelet is so nice on the new ones. Moreso than the bigger case size, what really kills the new one for me is the oversized hands and markers.. too cartoonish. But overall still a beautiful watch (I like the orange hand but also not crazy about the orange text). It's gone up about $500 since I bought it. On the one hand its nice to see it rise since I own one, on the other... I don't want Rolex prices to rise for obvious reasons. Great video as always, Teddy.
Great content again...Teddys videos have become part of my daily youtube fix... Do you have plans to do something on the Girard Perregeux Laureato? And the VC Overseas.. I'd really like to see your review of the GP ...
@@TeddyBaldassarre Looking forward to that Teddy. The Laureato tho 👌👌👌 So undervalued...I really lile that piece. Bell is rung..thumbs are up 👍 Looking forward to future vids.
I've always wondered what the black material is they use on the polar explorers for the markers and hands. Is it resin? Just wondering, cause afaik these are the only Rolex watches that use this kind of material.
I’ve owned a polar in both the 40mm and 42mm case size. Both are terrific watches. For me, at 73 the 42 is my choice. It’s easier on my eyes. Additionally, the 42 has a much better clasp.
my dream polar explorer would be the 16570 with an orange GMT hand. I like the new iterations but don't think the polar dial works anywhere near as well. Looking forward to seeing what they do for the 50th anniversary next year
Great video, very good information on both watches. I prefer the 16570. It was my first luxury watch. It can be used in any occasion. When my collection grew it became my outdoors watch.
My favourite is my Y series 16570 black dial. It’s become an absolute go-to piece, alongside Snowflake and Speedie. You can really see how fat the new ones are when you put them side by side, I was actually fishing for a Polar dial, but found this one and decided to take a punt. So glad I did, the black dial just seems more understated and versatile, it can be worn with almost anything. Still love the polar dial, tho. Congrats on yours Teddy, and great video.
Was initially put off by the 216750 . Thought it looked clumsy and just didn’t appeal to me going by images online . Went to purchase the older model 16570 . Tried both on and to my surprise instantly fell in love with the 216570 black dial. The slim case makes the 42 size work perfectly. It hugs the wrist . Absolutely stunning . My advice try one on and like me you might be pleasantly surprised ! 👍🏻
here's what I think, the white dial is better in the 16570 while the black is better on the 216570/226570. The black 42mm helps the watch look a bit smaller while the white 42 looks large and I find the orange gmt hand works better with the black dial than the white, while the red gmt hand complements the white 16570 nicely.
Thanks for the review Teddy - 16570 is the pick in polar white - would go the same choice as you, proportions are better and love the more traditional vintage vibe
I love the classic orange 24 hr. hand vs. the red, it pops and is historic. I’d say it’s pretty simple, if you have a smaller wrist, get the smaller case and vice versa. Also the modern bracelet and lume is 🔥
Could anyone help me in the search of a Seiko watch? I’m a newbie and a bit lost at the moment. I’ve had my eyes dead set on the SNKL41 but it seems to have been discontinued as prices are somewhat inflated. Was there ever a replacement model? I can’t find any info
I need one of these watches to go on my adventures hunting and fishing in the wilderness. I love my vintage Datejust but I can’t bring that lovely thing hunting.
Hi. I'm looking to buy a 42mm 2016, 216570 black dial with orange rubber band and stainless steal, comes with books, box and papers. Do you think is worth $11,500 ? Thank you
How can you tell what year a 16570 is ? ive bought a 2007 but sure its early 2000's as i read in the mid 2000's they started putting ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX around the rim (rehaut) between the glass and face. Thanks
I bought a 16570 T in 2015 for $3150. I am a Land Rover guy who appreciates classic design. I put it in the safe until today and started looking into value. Holy crap...I should have bought three or four. I love that it does not look at all pretentious. Simple clean design. Thank you for a great video.
Honestly if I were to buy a Rolex today, it would be the Explorer II, 100%. Love the white dial with the orange GMT hand popping.
AGREE!
The Rolex hand is 🔥
Nailed it
Bought one yesterday. Love it
The red hand makes it look anaemic, unhealthy, the orange is life
Both references are really unique cool pieces. I opted with the 216570 polar and I love the orange 24h and also the orange lettering on the dial. You cant go wrong with either of these awesome watches.
Just got the 216570 on Wednesday of this week. It’s my first Rolex and I could not be happier with this purchase. I’m a bigger guy so the larger casing fits me nicely. I love that I can wear this at work with dress clothes and on weekends with jeans and a t-shirt. So glad you posted this video!! Keep up the great work!!
Congrats, wear it in good health. Love that fat orange GMT hand.
Thank you! Yes the GMT hand is mesmerizing. All the best!
It's a tool-watch, so one should use it appropriatly
And you’re the typical internet troll who has nothing better to do than read and post comments all day. At least I have a nice time piece at the end of the day!
Maybe you can ask Mommy for an increase in allowance so you try to afford one one day.
Love the 16570 - 40mm red GMT hand, it is just unique and has become an iconic classic and the fact they are no longer continuing 40mm it will go up in value.
I was lucky enough to get one as a graduation gift in 2004.
Had a 16570, now a 216570. Looking forward to the 50th anniversary model in 2021.
The orange 24 hour hand on the 216570 matching the “Explorer II” script is fantastic.
There it is! To think I was just wondering what had happened to that comparison video 2 weeks ago, yet you were already making it. Thanks, Teddy.
Haha it took a while to get this one done. I am usually working on several videos at once. Thanks for being patient and watching Jasper!
The 16750 has always been my favorite Rolex, hands down!
I bought my polar one brand new in 2003 and I still love it!
It was hard for me to decide between the polar and the black..., I end up buying a black one two and they are my 2 favorite watches in my 10 watch collection!
I would not change them for any other Rolex model.
Totally understand this. I have the Polar. Love it. Looking for the black.
Really nice review, Teddy. Very professionally videoed too. I just bought my first polar Explorer II (circa 2011) last weekend and wore it on the slopes skiing-very cool look in the snow indeed. The red hour hand is its most stunning feature and unique compared to almost every other watch available, particularly striking in the current model. I actually really like the black dial version too as the hour markers highlights its distinctive 18ct gold finish that is not so apparent on the white dial, lending itself a more dressy appearance. It’s almost a different watch in that regard.
The smaller cases are in my opinion more classic and aesthetic in proportion. Rolex should slim down its sports models again.
I agree completely.
No. Perhaps Rolex could take note of what Omega has done with their Planet Ocean line and offer multiple sizes. As I indicated in another comment, guys with larger wrists simply can’t wear 40mm watches without looking ridiculous. Just imagine a world with footwear available in only one size. Great idea, huh? 😁
@@VaiSolo You could just extend the bracelet ;) Nah I totally get you, I would have a thicker wrist by most standards but I do prefer the smaller watches 36mm-40mm is my comfort zone but the new Rolex case sizes wear much larger such as the 116610 vs 16610.
Honoured to be mentioned by you Teddy. Thanks a million! The Explorer's are such hidden gems (understated, very un-rolex for the most part) I had a thought the other day about whether Tudor would ever consider reintroducing the 1655 aesthetic and made some mock-ups. And I fully agree that the modern Exp 2 should get a bit of a refresh (bringing the size down would be great for us skinny guys) maybe the introduction of a Ceramic bezel insert, but a Grey insert instead of Black. Maybe Basel 2020 will be the year of the Explorer?
crazy to read this 2 years later and now we got the BB Pro which is kinda a 1655
@@a.s.f.6163 The Grand Seiko SBGM247 beats them both by miles.
@@ekimandersom4478no not really lol
@@kinnymane8593 In finishing, looks, price definitely!
@@ekimandersom4478 The sbgm247 is more expensive than the Tudor Bb pro. So you’re wrong there, you’re also wrong about the finishing. Looks is completely subjective, the only thing I’d really give you there is GS just has better dials all-around
I've waited for this video for a while! I'm buying a 16570 in a few weeks and this has been affirming to the choice I made :) Great content
Absolutely the 216570.
I have nothing against smaller, mid-sized watches and think people should consider size when buying a watch, but I do get tired of reviewers with small wrists whining during every single review for a return to 1940-50s sized watches. I don't personally like "dinner plate" sized watches, neither do I buy them, but some people enjoy them. Surely we can allow for differences in taste and wrist sizes and the fact that many people like the availability of larger watches and that those modern watches look good on larger wrists and with current style.
A fedora looked great on Humphrey Bogart, but fedoras aren't appropriate in the 2020s.
youre telling me,,8,5 inch wrist here,,anything smaller than 45 looks like a ladies watch
yeah I got an 8 inch wrist and got a 216570 and it's anything BUT large. sad story is... brand new from AD, bezel is slightly misaligned to the right, and the minute indexes are touching the rehaut at the bottom... donno if I should have it corrected
@@pizza.doctor im with you..at over 8 inches myself those guys think we are freaks and we cant find any hot watches that actually look like a mans size on us, it would be great of they made nice ones that were between 48 and 52 mm
at 40 mm its a women/cuck size
Fedoras are never appropriate.... ha ha.... The 216570 is stunning in person.
I see you have a new review format. Nice Teddy! Beautiful video
Thank you my friend! 🙌🏻🙌🏻
Awesome video: 2 great watches, a lot of detailed information and fantastic macros. Well done Teddy!
I've got the newer 216570 black dial for a couple of years now. All I can tell you is that it is scary accurate! And it wears...unreal
I like how you always show a proper wrist shot so people can get a idea how a watch might fit them. The 42mm didn’t look bad at all on your 6.25” wrist. You could wear either. I wasn’t thinking it would work for my 7” wrist but maybe it will after all
My 16570 polar has recently been serviced, and is running +1 second after 6 weeks ... not per day, TOTAL. Not only that but it has been dropped once onto a wood floor from about 4' ... and I do basically everything in it. I love this watch so much. Good choice Teddy!
"Yeah, I'm kinda pathetic... I have problems..." I think you speak for all of us in the watch community haha
I'm a 216570 owner. my father had a 16570 in his collection when I was in college and I always loved it. My first Rolex was a Stainless Sub. Then I made the jump to the Explorer II (216570) and have worn it day in and day out since 2013. Great everyday wear (just as Teddy said). I have a few other brands and they all get wrist time, but this is the go-to and I have a hard time reaching over it in the winder to grab something different. Great review!
This video was super helpful. Just bought a 16570 F series a couple weeks ago for my 25th anniversary. First real watch. So happy.
Fantastic comparison Teddy. I love both of these polar dials. I love the white dial with the black surrounds. Thank you for another awesome video :)
Been itching to get an Explorer II for a while now. The 16570 just has a more classic size and IMO it is more timeless.
I agree as well when it comes to my personal tastes. Love the line though!
The early ones have tritium dials which age gloriously.
sunflash101 no thanks. it’s overall feel is way too tinny for my taste.
Which version of the 16570 is considered the most desirable apart from the earliest tritium version? In terms of lugs and movement?
Completely agree. The 216570 looks bloated and unbalanced, so happy with my ‘old’ Polar
I have a larger wrist than yours at 7.25”, so I’m comfortable wearing a 42mm watch. I would buy a new Explorer II either dial.
Good review. The 216570 has a great balance in appearance especially because it is relatively thin compared to a lot of 42mm watches. The larger hands (largest in the Rolex line BTW) also give it a unique, almost cartoonish, look. I added a black Rubber B strap with the thin orange stripe and the watch becomes a fantastic "modern" interpretation of what a Rolex is today.
Great video! 👍🏻 it nailed the spot. Also, it would be great if you did a video about sub no date old vs new. Thanks.
I have owned many watches, as I get older, style is important, but comfort is just as important. I always found larger watches to clunky and hard to get over a coat or shirt etc. The sweet spot for me, is the 39-40mm range. I own a few Rolex watches, and a 16570 is one I own. I like the watch a lot, no regrets. I couldn’t care a less, if others knowI wear a Rolex or not. Thanks for the video.
nice...i recognize that music you used in this video..it brings memories to your old videos
Great video teddy. Next you should do a comparison between a Horology House Daytona and a real one. 😄
I like the thicker/orange GMT hand, and also love the orange type on the dial of 216570. I'd prefer the 40mm case, but would still pick the newest gen based on the use of the complementary orange, and the drastically improved oyster bracelet.
The 40mm polar is amazing, the white dial is so flexible it works in every situation! But the best is one with the "ivory / cream" dial.
Your previous 1 month review of the 16570 was the last straw- I ended up buying the exact same model last month! I can't seem to rotate it off my wrist. I follow the all-purpose ethos in almost everything I buy and this thing is the real deal. Basically a GMT Master II at a 30% discount and no "questions" .
Teddy, your content is stellar! Thank you for your detailed descriptions and amazing watch photography. I bought the 16570 “Swiss.” 😉 Love it!!
16570 40mm SEL bracelet with lug holes and upgraded 3186 movement-simply the best. Nice one, Arch.
Hey Ted, thanks again for another stellar review but this time on a timeless classic- the Rolex Explorer II. This watch is truly the embodiment of a "one watch collection" and the minor scratches on the case speak volumes to your immense appreciation and utility for the piece.
Thank you, Nicholas. I definitely have not babied the piece. Such a great watch.
Love your video's. Well done!
I own the 216 and am amazed how comfortable it is. It very rarely comes off my wrist as I don’t notice it’s there. With the sun shining at an angle on the watch it’s incredible how much “pop” there is to the watch with every detail showing. The lume even shows up during the day if it faces the sun for more than 10 sec. Mine holds right at the +2 sec per day; considering taking it to the AD to have it regulated closer to zero. Overall very pleased with the watch.
If you like skiing, there is no other watch on the planet better than the Explorer II Polar. I got mine 15 years ago, feels great, I always keep it on when swimming
I also swim with mine! I was thinking, am I crazy? After Teddy mentioned maybe not to. I think as long as within a reasonable time of service or water resist test its fine.
I couldn’t agree more, the polar dial is a total game changer. I own a 216570 myself and I love it. I’ve had every Rolex except a Daytona and air king and IMO it’s the best all around watch yet it stands out from the crowd.
Just picked up my 216570 polar :) verry happy with it looking great next to my SD43. Nice vids mate
I just watched this video again and boy do I wish the 40m was still available for $5500-$7000, and even the new one in the $8k range. Amazing how fast that price jump was in 2 years. The old one is now more expensive than the new one was 2 years ago!
Hi Teddy, a huge fan here with a question. Love your reviews, especially when you give specs.
Just purchased the 16570, black dial, Super LumiNova, drilled lugs, and solid endlinks. Love the value. Under 10K the Rolex’s you’re limited to are primarily time only, or with date under 40mm (really mainly 36mm and under). At 39mm you’re literally only getting time only. So to get a Rolex with complications, with the Rolex classics (Mercedes hands, magnified date), while still being lowkey, it’s just amazing.
Excellent video Teddy - may I say that I think the production has come along very well - best photography/production from you I can remember and the sound has come a long way. I own the bigger one - I wanted to get one of the smaller ones originally but they were impossible to find in London for relsale let alone an AD. Took a while to even find the bigger one but I found one and bought one - always comes to Asia and USA with me. Tried a smaller one in Mumbai wrapped in plastic but I don't see myself getting more than one GMT as I feel it would be redundant.
I really enjoyed the video! Just don't flog anyone some fake ass watches LOL
Have a good one
Great video, thanks for posting! Looking to purchase one of these soon. It would be helpful if you could put the model numbers in the pic when you show the visual comparison such as in frame 13:39. Which model is which? You can figure it out but not after stopping replaying a few times....Truly appreciate the video, it was super helpful
Thx Teddy one of these needs to be in my collection
Awesome Video, just as i decided to get an Explorer 2 Polaris as next Watch
Great comparison. I’m a huge fan of the Explorer II Polar. My 16570 has the lug holes. I prefer the 24 hand of the 16570. Bought it used 20+ years ago and swapped out the Tritium with a Super Luminova face and hands. Had to replace the mainspring but it has been a workhorse.
I like mine the best. It's the 16550 that I purchased in 1984 for less than 900 bucks. It has that beautiful (defective!) cream rail dial.
The almost Bond ⌚
Great comparison. Helps me in my decision.
Don't forget about the white dialed turn-o-graph. It is unmistakably a sports watch, considering that it was the first Rolex designed with a rotatable bezel.
I bought my 216570 brand new in July 2014. Worn it every day since then. It's just gone in for its first service and I miss it so much ........
I picked up a cream rail dial explorer II 16550 and absolutely love it!
Love my 16570 Z serial, got as my first luxury watch for my birthday. So versatile and quiet but also an awesome sports watch for daily use!
Teddy great video, can you share the 216570 screensaver looks nice. Thx
Teddy, does Bobs do any dealer discounts or wholesale?
Terrific presentation indeed Teddy!!! If I had to choose my no.1 wishlist timepiece it is the "Rolex Red Sea-dweller" with date magnifier.
Great as usual. What do you think of the newest model in black?
I’m a 50 something curmudgeon but I think the older bracelets wear much more comfy. However I love the newer dial but wish they’d left it at 40. Rolex got into the 40+ game too late and is starting to look a little silly for it by 2022 here.
Great video. Glad that I found it.
great video 👍. I have been wearing the explorer 2 polar .. I love the aesthetics ans the presence on the wrist and not once I felt it’s too big . and absolutely don’t feel the need to get older reference . in my Peronist opinion . absolute keeper . cheers
Great review of the Explorer II. Thanks for sharing. I think I prefer the modern version. Would be a great companion piece to my modern steel Sub.
Informative video, I recently purchased the 226570 in polar and black versions because I couldn't decide, I honestly find the black better but they both are excellent tool/sport watches for me with amazing built quality and specs.
TB… another terrific video!! Are there any rumors or street intel about Rolex offering a 40mm (or 36/38mm) Explorer II in the near future??
I’m waiting!
Hi there, I am a fan of your channel. :)
I was wondering if you can do up a video on which watch brands that aren't worth the money? Be it a brand new piece at recommended retail/ sticker price or brands that simply use the basic ETA movement and then charges way beyond what's the watch is worth?
Hear from you soon!
Regards
Kelvin (Singapore)
Enjoyed your video and analysis. This will probably be my first Rolex. The white dial and orange detail are stunning.
I love the milgauss it's so frickin cooolll
Teddy: Theres a also Polar white option for the newer steel Datejust 41. Also a beautiful face. Grabbed one of those last year.
I've recently purchased the 2021 226570 Polar and do love this watch. I also own a 2019 Date Submariner and I agree with you on the size. My wrist is slightly over 7 inches but would rather see the Explorer II at 40mm. With that said I'm still very happy with my 226570. Great video on both watches 👏👍
16570 would be my choice. The overall aesthetics just work so muvh better than the over bulked case and indecies of the newer version. Thanks for the video teddy 🙏
at $5.5k would you take a 2 line no date 1997 sub or 40mm polar exp2 for better long term value?
5 digit polar, well done Teddy
I've got a tritium 16570 (1995) I bought about a year ago and I swim with it! I think as long as its within a reasonable time of service or pressure test its ok (I got it certified pre-owned, so serviced by RSC). I agree the 16570 takes the cake although the bracelet is so nice on the new ones. Moreso than the bigger case size, what really kills the new one for me is the oversized hands and markers.. too cartoonish. But overall still a beautiful watch (I like the orange hand but also not crazy about the orange text). It's gone up about $500 since I bought it. On the one hand its nice to see it rise since I own one, on the other... I don't want Rolex prices to rise for obvious reasons. Great video as always, Teddy.
Great content again...Teddys videos have become part of my daily youtube fix... Do you have plans to do something on the Girard Perregeux Laureato?
And the VC Overseas..
I'd really like to see your review of the GP ...
Thanks Jimmy! Have not strongly considered the GP but can. The overseas, oh yes. I can make that happen at some point I am sure.
@@TeddyBaldassarre Looking forward to that Teddy.
The Laureato tho 👌👌👌
So undervalued...I really lile that piece.
Bell is rung..thumbs are up 👍
Looking forward to future vids.
I've always wondered what the black material is they use on the polar explorers for the markers and hands. Is it resin? Just wondering, cause afaik these are the only Rolex watches that use this kind of material.
Which 16570 is considered the most desirable apart from the tritium dial? In terms of end links, movement etc?
You recommend a 216570 for larger wrists or can you pull off wearing a 16570 with a large wrist that looks good? thx
Thoughts on the Horology House situation?
I’ve owned a polar in both the 40mm and 42mm case size. Both are terrific watches. For me, at 73 the 42 is my choice. It’s easier on my eyes. Additionally, the 42 has a much better clasp.
What size wrist do you have, if you don't mind me asking?
my dream polar explorer would be the 16570 with an orange GMT hand. I like the new iterations but don't think the polar dial works anywhere near as well. Looking forward to seeing what they do for the 50th anniversary next year
It would be great to have an upgrade of its oyster movement with the new 70 hours power reserve.
Great video, very good information on both watches. I prefer the 16570. It was my first luxury watch. It can be used in any occasion. When my collection grew it became my outdoors watch.
Bruce The Shark ,,, way to go the intended porpoise of the tool watch
My favourite is my Y series 16570 black dial. It’s become an absolute go-to piece, alongside Snowflake and Speedie. You can really see how fat the new ones are when you put them side by side, I was actually fishing for a Polar dial, but found this one and decided to take a punt. So glad I did, the black dial just seems more understated and versatile, it can be worn with almost anything. Still love the polar dial, tho. Congrats on yours Teddy, and great video.
If you have small wrists but thick build should you size your watch up?
What sports can be played while wearing the watch?
Was initially put off by the 216750 . Thought it looked clumsy and just didn’t appeal to me going by images online . Went to purchase the older model 16570 . Tried both on and to my surprise instantly fell in love with the 216570 black dial. The slim case makes the 42 size work perfectly. It hugs the wrist . Absolutely stunning . My advice try one on and like me you might be pleasantly surprised ! 👍🏻
here's what I think, the white dial is better in the 16570 while the black is better on the 216570/226570. The black 42mm helps the watch look a bit smaller while the white 42 looks large and I find the orange gmt hand works better with the black dial than the white, while the red gmt hand complements the white 16570 nicely.
Great video, I'm also in the market for the classic 16570, cant find one I can trust.
i have a black 16570 but i want to convert it to the polar version, is there any way that i can buy the dial and hands?
yo teddy, do you have any daytonas for sale?
Thanks for the review Teddy - 16570 is the pick in polar white - would go the same choice as you, proportions are better and love the more traditional vintage vibe
Any chance for a state of the collection video?
I bought the 16570 Polar and 216570 Black and I love them both for different reasons! Cheers
I love the classic orange 24 hr. hand vs. the red, it pops and is historic. I’d say it’s pretty simple, if you have a smaller wrist, get the smaller case and vice versa. Also the modern bracelet and lume is 🔥
Fell in love with the white Yachtmaster years ago...
Could anyone help me in the search of a Seiko watch? I’m a newbie and a bit lost at the moment. I’ve had my eyes dead set on the SNKL41 but it seems to have been discontinued as prices are somewhat inflated. Was there ever a replacement model? I can’t find any info
I need one of these watches to go on my adventures hunting and fishing in the wilderness. I love my vintage Datejust but I can’t bring that lovely thing hunting.
Hi. I'm looking to buy a 42mm 2016, 216570 black dial with orange rubber band and stainless steal, comes with books, box and papers. Do you think is worth $11,500 ? Thank you
How can you tell what year a 16570 is ? ive bought a 2007 but sure its early 2000's as i read in the mid 2000's they started putting ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX around the rim (rehaut) between the glass and face. Thanks
Can you switch bracelets to newer one?
So is it a 24 hour dial? For both hr hands?
How does the steel bezel wear over time?