True, but we shall not forget where Embraer was when they just began producing planes. In 20 or 30 years, COMAC might be a real competitor if they do it all right, like Embraer did.
ARJ21 and E195-E2 are for different market. Comparisons are useful but not very meaningful, sort of trying to compare Airbus A319 to A321. Airlines will assess their route ranges, passenger demands, and cargo needs. These two designs will coexist for different needs.
Both have different advantage, the E195 need proper handling equipment like staircase, cargo, food and luggage handling eqyipment as it stand higher from the Ground. While the ArJ21, fornerly by Doyglas was designed to be low on the ground for easy handling. Further the Douglas design no need tow truck to Reverse as the aircaft engine can be set to Reverse 5 sests across is definetly less claustrophobic compare to the narrower 4 abreast seating of E195. Comac can stretch the plane for more Seat and get a less noisy engine to reduce noise at the Rear seats.
Embraer has yet develop a freighter conversion for their E jets. And for the US Scope Clause the E195-E2 is not a Regional Jet. Some data presented in the video was indeed for the E1 version of E195!!!
They are on different category. ARJ is the legacy design of MD90 with new re-design wing. E-2 is more slightly in capacity and directly competitive to the Canadian A220.
The chinese ARJ is a duplicate of any B 717 or MD 90 Series back in the 90`s as well. But does not mean it`s a bad one. Made to achieve its programmed tasks, its own regional chinese market, it`s pretty enough for Comac and the operating airlines. Thanks God the attemp to merger Boeing and Embraer failed some years ago, so far so good, and our Brazilian border country has a true winners regional aircraft samples, able to compete anywhere. The manufacturer`s doupoly from French and US brands, is not any good for nobody at all, competition is very healthy.
The certain arrogance of some Brazilians is striking when the plane is built 90% with North American, European and even Israeli parts. Curiously, I want to remember that the company that owns Embraer is an Israeli company.
you don't know anything, china's arj21 series are extremely practical and extreme cost effective, it took china very long to accomplish it but now it is a powerful rival for region jets in the world. The japanese cancelled their and nobody can develop it like china But Embraer has better western support... but Arj21 is average very thing, it is fuel economy , comfort and size are all standard.. plus china can sell them to the global south with less price. . with an order of 365 plane. While Embraer 195 order 354, so it is neck and neck at moment.
The Embraer E-Jets are very efficient, and from what I’ve hear from some pilots, a great aeroplane to fly. But from a ramp agent’s point of view, the Embraer E-Jets are an absolut shit to load or unload. That’s not just my opinion, but all of my colleagues say the same thing.
The ARJ21 is essentially a reengineered MD-80 with a body shrunk down to regional jet dimensions, also known as "MD-80 Frankenstein". Nothing near the technological level of the Embraer.
If I’m not mistaken this Chinese is a copy of erj-145. Embraer had a plant in China but left the country due to disagreements with Chinise as they started to build another plant just couple years after the production started.
So you are absolutely mistaken. ARJ cabin has 3-2 seat config, while the puny ERJ145 is 2-2 seat config. So ARJ cabin is wider. It is a copy of MD-90 with new wing design and new avionics.
Why do China need to copy airplane design?? Isn't all commercial planes similar? -- two wings two turbine engines.. or you simply shoot your mouth off. Isn't the Chinese space station Tian -gong a copy of ISS too.... NOW will you suggests also China's 5.5G spectrum a similar copy of 4G. Better still the Chinese having babies also a copy of US child-bearing : THINK
This video sounds like a Chinese propaganda piece. There is no match for a copy of the older Embraer ERJ family with the E-Jet family, Yes COMAC did stoled Embraer design and technology to develop the ARJ 21. To compare Embraer products to Comac is like comparing a Bugatti Veyron to a cheap Chinese copy.
@@c雨颖E daí? No Brasil também está desenvolvendo novos automóveis de tecnologia brasileira totalmente modernos. Sem falar que já tem três empresas fabricantes de carros voadores e uma deles estão desenvolvendo carros táxi e caminhões voadores. Além que o ITA e DCTA por parte da IEAv estão desenvolvendo um futuro coletor de lixo espacial planador na órbita da Terra. Mas não liga não, o teu país (China) e o meu país (Brasil) estão bem numa boa amizade. O teu país está em pleno expansão e o meu prepara o mesmo, porém de modo diferente.
@smitheasydog7401 and you're worshipper of CCP ? I have personally used Chinese products. None of them works longer than 6 months. All of their products are useless
![ร้อยพ่อพันแม่ - WanMai [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XY2pNYASEbg/mqdefault.jpg)
The E195-E2 is a winner! Embraer means excellency.
Arj21 has 364 orders. E195 has 354 orders.
Comac has a long path to reach Embraer worldwide reputation.
True, but we shall not forget where Embraer was when they just began producing planes. In 20 or 30 years, COMAC might be a real competitor if they do it all right, like Embraer did.
If it’s a Boeing, I ain’t flying!
Concordo com você 👍🏻
No Goddawn way that this China aircraft is not safe.
Embraer is in a whole new league. Its one of those aircraft where you can trust it 100%
Without a doubt because 90% of the aircraft's materials are of North American and European origin.
@@ATOMICO2000 absolutely not lmao
@@ATOMICO2000What explains the dozens of accumulated crashes of Airbus and Boeing aircraft?
ARJ21 and E195-E2 are for different market. Comparisons are useful but not very meaningful, sort of trying to compare Airbus A319 to A321. Airlines will assess their route ranges, passenger demands, and cargo needs. These two designs will coexist for different needs.
I would probably compare the ARJ-21 with E175
Or better with Embraer 190
Sorry but some numbers are related to the E195 E1, mtow of E2 is 61.500 kg the lenght is 41.5m 0.5 shorter than the 737-900.
the E195-E2 is a great aircraft for regional routes in NZ
Arj looks ok but Embraer is in a different league. Beauty , quality , safety and reliability.
Both have different advantage, the E195 need proper handling equipment like staircase, cargo, food and luggage handling eqyipment as it stand higher from the Ground.
While the ArJ21, fornerly by Doyglas was designed to be low on the ground for easy handling. Further the Douglas design no need tow truck to Reverse as the aircaft engine can be set to Reverse
5 sests across is definetly less claustrophobic compare to the narrower 4 abreast seating of E195.
Comac can stretch the plane for more Seat and get a less noisy engine to reduce noise at the Rear seats.
Embraer has yet develop a freighter conversion for their E jets.
And for the US Scope Clause the E195-E2 is not a Regional Jet.
Some data presented in the video was indeed for the E1 version of E195!!!
In my humble opinion, the Embraer E195-E2 is possibly the safest plane. and quite possibly the most comfortable as well.
There's no comparison between these two airplanes, Embraer is dar beyond
Well done China, great product.
They are on different category. ARJ is the legacy design of MD90 with new re-design wing. E-2 is more slightly in capacity and directly competitive to the Canadian A220.
The chinese ARJ is a duplicate of any B 717 or MD 90 Series back in the 90`s as well. But does not mean it`s a bad one. Made to achieve its programmed tasks, its own regional chinese market, it`s pretty enough for Comac and the operating airlines. Thanks God the attemp to merger Boeing and Embraer failed some years ago, so far so good, and our Brazilian border country has a true winners regional aircraft samples, able to compete anywhere. The manufacturer`s doupoly from French and US brands, is not any good for nobody at all, competition is very healthy.
The certain arrogance of some Brazilians is striking when the plane is built 90% with North American, European and even Israeli parts. Curiously, I want to remember that the company that owns Embraer is an Israeli company.
The ARJ looks like it was made in the 1970s.
Chinese planes will take a long time to develop before they are true competitors.
you are not wrong. ARJ is a cousin of MD-80.
And now the propaganda begins. You certainly haven't seen the C919 of Comac.
@babacardiallo5662 he does not know what he is talking about i*diot arj is ahead of its time
you don't know anything, china's arj21 series are extremely practical and extreme cost effective, it took china very long to accomplish it but now it is a powerful rival for region jets in the world. The japanese cancelled their and nobody can develop it like china But Embraer has better western support... but Arj21 is average very thing, it is fuel economy , comfort and size are all standard.. plus china can sell them to the global south with less price. . with an order of 365 plane. While Embraer 195 order 354, so it is neck and neck at moment.
The Embraer E-Jets are very efficient, and from what I’ve hear from some pilots, a great aeroplane to fly. But from a ramp agent’s point of view, the Embraer E-Jets are an absolut shit to load or unload. That’s not just my opinion, but all of my colleagues say the same thing.
the comparison is wrong, you should compare the ARJ21 with the E190-E2.
No way José? Always EMBRAER💪👍
👍🏼
How many of the Chinese aircraft were sold to western operators?
Western is biased.
they fear competition by denying issue certificate to Chinese planes 😂
Only 1 Airlines outside China operate ARJ21, that’s in Indonesia ( the got the aircraft more or less for free )
The ARJ21 is essentially a reengineered MD-80 with a body shrunk down to regional jet dimensions, also known as "MD-80 Frankenstein". Nothing near the technological level of the Embraer.
Amazing and beautiful aircraft.
If I’m not mistaken this Chinese is a copy of erj-145. Embraer had a plant in China but left the country due to disagreements with Chinise as they started to build another plant just couple years after the production started.
i was hoping you would say MD airplane. turn out you don't know much.
So you are absolutely mistaken. ARJ cabin has 3-2 seat config, while the puny ERJ145 is 2-2 seat config. So ARJ cabin is wider. It is a copy of MD-90 with new wing design and new avionics.
Why do China need to copy airplane design?? Isn't all commercial planes similar? -- two wings two turbine engines.. or you simply shoot your mouth off. Isn't the Chinese space station Tian -gong a copy of ISS too.... NOW will you suggests also China's 5.5G spectrum a similar copy of 4G. Better still the Chinese having babies also a copy of US child-bearing : THINK
ARJ-21 is just a MD-80 Copy without the Window Eyebrows, so Embraer Wins This copy of McDonnel Douglas still a Mcdonnel douglas
Brasil defet.
Not compared was fuel efficiency, aircraft cost, and maintenance cost.
Thanks
China Ar 21 is good,,,don't judge it by your opinion?
Innovation? It's a DC-9 with a few updates.
The China plane looks like a little bit style from DC9 and FokkerF28. Not this centurie's style. An hybrid
Impossible !!! Embraer is higly superior in every aspect.
ARJ21-700 and 900 are similar to the old Fokker 100 !!!
No E195 but E175-E2 vs ARJ21.The ARJ 21the better Boeing 717?
A lot of rabish you are comparing the incomparable
First view and comments
This video sounds like a Chinese propaganda piece. There is no match for a copy of the older Embraer ERJ family with the E-Jet family, Yes COMAC did stoled Embraer design and technology to develop the ARJ 21. To compare Embraer products to Comac is like comparing a Bugatti Veyron to a cheap Chinese copy.
China's automobile is the first in the world, haven't you ever gone to school?
@@c雨颖E daí? No Brasil também está desenvolvendo novos automóveis de tecnologia brasileira totalmente modernos. Sem falar que já tem três empresas fabricantes de carros voadores e uma deles estão desenvolvendo carros táxi e caminhões voadores. Além que o ITA e DCTA por parte da IEAv estão desenvolvendo um futuro coletor de lixo espacial planador na órbita da Terra. Mas não liga não, o teu país (China) e o meu país (Brasil) estão bem numa boa amizade. O teu país está em pleno expansão e o meu prepara o mesmo, porém de modo diferente.
try checking who owns this channel, this channel comes from western news, they like to compare each other.
Who cares Bugatti Veyron?! Wake up! China's automobile is No. 1 in the world now.
Arj21 is superior. Looks and acts like a large passenger jet. E-195 is too skinny and looks like a business jet. Made by a partial failed state.
Chinese made is rubbish. No warranty. Everyone should go with the Brazilian one
Rubbish is instead of your brain.
@vladilenkalatschev4915 bro Chinese products are awful. I know it's hard for you to accept but it's a fact.
@@vladilenkalatschev4915 bro chinese products fail miserably. Cope it
you are brainwashed....
@smitheasydog7401 and you're worshipper of CCP ? I have personally used Chinese products. None of them works longer than 6 months. All of their products are useless
China crappy plane , Embraer is better,
much more quality and safety
ARJ21-900 ainda está em desenvolvimento...
Many airline cancelled embraer operation
C909 is copycat😂
有些巴西人的回复非常幼稚可笑😂