Australian aborigines keep repeating that they are the original inhabitants of the land and have been here since 60 thousand years. Can’t wait to have some science to refute this nonsense. Good job guys. Much appreciated the series. Must get the book.
I saw a program not long ago, might have been TH-cam, where there was a lady from New Zealand with odd features from some ancient group on the island, and when they traced down her DNA she was Canaanite I think. From middle east.
@@michaelszczys8316 …I don’t completely trust commercial DNA tests, they tend to be a bit vague and not very specific, but they give a general direction anyway. The idea that the earth has been inhabited for that long is my main concern with the claims some groups make to legitimise their ownership of the land and therefore have sovereignty (in Australia).
I like seeing the maps of how the countries changed over the centuries. I'm German descent. Arrived in USA in the 1800s. (Like you, I'm in WI.). Regarding climate change, I've always believed that the glaciers, for instance, have been melting for centuries.
This is so fascinating! My family tree traced one line back to Europe with that line coming to the US in the 1620s. To my surprise, my DNA testing indicated both Bengali and Han people. I discovered this about 5 years ago and after seeing this video it makes complete sense now.
Wow, such great stuff! I started watching this series and I can't get enough. Daniel 12:4 in talking about the end says "and knowledge shall increase". Well here we go!
30:48 It really is fun to study a subject like history when you have an immediate use for the knowledge :) Easy to stay focused, and you catch a lot more details than if you're just studying for the sake of completing a curriculum.
There are a lot of linguistic artifacts that make it appear as though South Asians that spoke Tamil actually had trading colonies is Europe at some period in history. Basque get tagged as having no linguistic relatives, but it's definitely related to two languages , Armenian and Tamil. If you line up sentences from these far distant languages together there are shocking similarities. When you think of the mechanics of how empires spread across the map its not that hard to believe. The soldiers of whatever empire happens to be on the rise kill most of the men of the area they conquer, introduce their lineage into the local women , leave some women behind , take some with them, and sell some of them somewhere else as slaves. This happens city after city, village after village after village, tribe after tribe, over MASSIVE areas of land, tragic but factual. To take that further, most of said soldiers of said empire are from a people group who are ALREADY related (the massive Roman empire started with a small tribe from Central Italy) Then think of how many times this has happened. The Persians, 600 to 350 bc, the Greeks, 350 to 100 bc the Romans 100 bc to 550 ad , the Muslims 650 to the 1800s ad, the crusades 1000s to 1200s the kahns, 1200s to 1500s European colonialism, 1500s to 2000s. When you take the ancient ubiquitous business of slavery itself into account, this pattern of an already closely related group of males spreading their seed far and wide follows the same insemination ratio , except the children produced by slave rapes tend to be born on the home turf of the dominant people group , while the war rapes of the same groups tend to be born abroad. What that culture does to the people around them when they rise to power tends to come back to them 200 to 500 years later on average. Taking all this history into account its not surprising that there would be end up being a very small amount of forgotten male progenitors we would find in our gene pool!
I was astonished to see my ancestry results. I figured that I'd be over 90% Ashkenazi Eastern European, and I am, but I'm also part Israeli, Greek and Mongol. I find it completely crazy, yet amazing. I can't help but wonder how exactly I became part mongolian. Probably Genghis Khan.
The problem with this series is that population movements don't necessarily interbreed with other populations. In the case of the British in India, they certainly don't marry them. Same with migratory peoples into Europe. They often keep very much to themselves.
Per a lot of the older historical records and paintings, the Eastern Steppe tribes like the Mongols were more Caucasian (blonde & light brown hair, blue eyes) prior to their conquest of China. When a land is conquered, each of the men often took home multiple young women as wives and concubines. And this of course will greatly change the genetics of a people, The historical records I am referring to are from several hundred years before the Mongol conquest of China and subsequent western expansion.
If Tiglath-Pileser III, an Assyrian conqueror in the 8th-century BCE, had taken European children as slaves and brought them back to his native country of northern Iraq, and if later these children (especially the male line) assimilated into the native culture and peoples, this will explain the haplogroup R1a2 that is prevalent in Assyrians today. It's all speculative and all very complicated.
I come from my mommy and my daddy! The further back we go the small the number of ancestors and less branch, more trunk. Back to a simple deck hand shoveling animal waste on a wooden ship. Mongol? Maybe. Maybe not. If they are good looking and handsome, I can be Mongol.
Peoples used to have darker skins including Asians even 200 years ago. Mahommed used to have red hair that's why some Arabs die their beards red. And evidently Genghis Khan did too. People in India say the Arians used to live in northern India. They taught them new ideas. When they date artifacts by the age and level of soil and even the part of an artifacts - they cannot say for 100% that that is the actual age of said artifacts - due to many reasons.
I wouldn't want to be of Mongolian decent only because the Hun was a vicious bloodthirsty brutal leader and I would feel generational shame. I don't think that would be the lineage God would choose. I want to believe that God would have humanity be less violent with each other, especially with a horde that does not advance God in any way, only conquest against others and violence.
Lots of people....Eastern Europeans...even Russians. Heavy on Asian dna. As much as Northern Europeans w 1 - 4% Neanderthal dna. What would Ken Ney think of Dr. Hugh Ross, and his Biblical & science outlook? Does this new dna data impact our understanding of Rh- blood type? If you have a basis DNA pattern for humans, how slight do the changes need to be, to create great variations?
Between 4:37 & 4:44 mins... "A few hundred thousand years ago"? This is a genuine mistake surely as a creationist, for 'adam goes back only 6000 years, and we are close to entering into the seventh thousandth year? What should it be?
@@masonmaestro I'm not too sure what you are getting at by having to listen again when you heard exectly what I did... a few hundred thoudand years... Which is impossible if you believe in creation.
@pln, Based on the research of Steven Rudd of The Shiloh Excavations, who relies on the chronology of the patriarchs & timeline as recorded in the Septuagint LXX text (the Masorectic text would provide a negative variance of about 800 years), he calculated Creation date to be approximately 5554 BC. The age of planet Earth to-date would therefore be: 5554 BC + 2023 AD = 7,577 years old. Btw, the Great Flood happened in 3298 BC. The destruction of the Tower of Babel was in 2850 BC. Hence, any claim to-date of any written text found that is older than 5,300 years old would be incorrect & unacceptable. The only probable oldest written text that could be claimed to have been found to-date is about 4,873 years old to be acceptable. Bear this in mind, people, when you come across such claims so true history is not corrupted.
@masonmaestro I did listen to it again, at least two times, and still got the same. He doesn't speak very clearly, but runs his words together like a lot of people these days yes I did go back and then had to put the subtitles on, because I missed the "if". But what a disgusting comment you made to me,.."but rather than take the time to make the comment". Was that rudeness really necessary?
@@iaam8141 Thank you for your comment. Was he not speaking of ancestry rather than the earth? I believe we haven't entered into the seventh thousandth year after 'Adam and Chawwah were made, as we are not in the millennium yet, and that's still man, not earth. We know that 6 is the number of man, and seven is YHWH's number. My comment was based on the understanding that he was speaking of ancestry; for what I believe concerning the age of the earth is far greater as well. Thanks, very "well put" comment.
Australian aborigines keep repeating that they are the original inhabitants of the land and have been here since 60 thousand years. Can’t wait to have some science to refute this nonsense. Good job guys. Much appreciated the series. Must get the book.
I saw a program not long ago, might have been TH-cam, where there was a lady from New Zealand with odd features from some ancient group on the island, and when they traced down her DNA she was Canaanite I think. From middle east.
@@michaelszczys8316 …I don’t completely trust commercial DNA tests, they tend to be a bit vague and not very specific, but they give a general direction anyway. The idea that the earth has been inhabited for that long is my main concern with the claims some groups make to legitimise their ownership of the land and therefore have sovereignty (in Australia).
I like seeing the maps of how the countries changed over the centuries. I'm German descent. Arrived in USA in the 1800s. (Like you, I'm in WI.). Regarding climate change, I've always believed that the glaciers, for instance, have been melting for centuries.
This is so fascinating! My family tree traced one line back to Europe with that line coming to the US in the 1620s. To my surprise, my DNA testing indicated both Bengali and Han people. I discovered this about 5 years ago and after seeing this video it makes complete sense now.
Wow, such great stuff! I started watching this series and I can't get enough. Daniel 12:4 in talking about the end says "and knowledge shall increase". Well here we go!
My mother always said our doe eyes came from the mongols Romanian and Italian. Mother's are always right 🤷
Can't wait until we can all see our real family tree from around the world family tree once they find a way of doing that!
30:48 It really is fun to study a subject like history when you have an immediate use for the knowledge :) Easy to stay focused, and you catch a lot more details than if you're just studying for the sake of completing a curriculum.
Excellent excellent. Excellent from start to finish so interesting I can’t stop watching.
The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom
. It can happen in 2 generations my black and white child has a blonde haired green eyed child
Have you considered Alexander the Great’s invasion into India as the European/Indian connection?
There are a lot of linguistic artifacts that make it appear as though South Asians that spoke Tamil actually had trading colonies is Europe at some period in history.
Basque get tagged as having no linguistic relatives, but it's definitely related to two languages , Armenian and Tamil. If you line up sentences from these far distant languages together there are shocking similarities.
When you think of the mechanics of how empires spread across the map its not that hard to believe. The soldiers of whatever empire happens to be on the rise kill most of the men of the area they conquer, introduce their lineage into the local women , leave some women behind , take some with them, and sell some of them somewhere else as slaves. This happens city after city, village after village after village, tribe after tribe, over MASSIVE areas of land, tragic but factual.
To take that further, most of said soldiers of said empire are from a people group who are ALREADY related (the massive Roman empire started with a small tribe from Central Italy)
Then think of how many times this has happened.
The Persians, 600 to 350 bc, the Greeks, 350 to 100 bc the Romans 100 bc to 550 ad , the Muslims 650 to the 1800s ad, the crusades 1000s to 1200s the kahns, 1200s to 1500s European colonialism, 1500s to 2000s.
When you take the ancient ubiquitous business of slavery itself into account,
this pattern of an already closely related group of males spreading their seed far and wide follows the same insemination ratio , except the children produced by slave rapes tend to be born on the home turf of the dominant people group , while the war rapes of the same groups tend to be born abroad.
What that culture does to the people around them when they rise to power tends to come back to them 200 to 500 years later on average.
Taking all this history into account its not surprising that there would be end up being a very small amount of forgotten male progenitors we would find in our gene pool!
I was astonished to see my ancestry results. I figured that I'd be over 90% Ashkenazi Eastern European, and I am, but I'm also part Israeli, Greek and Mongol. I find it completely crazy, yet amazing. I can't help but wonder how exactly I became part mongolian. Probably Genghis Khan.
Yes the Mongols Changed the blood line of Europe.
The problem with this series is that population movements don't necessarily interbreed with other populations. In the case of the British in India, they certainly don't marry them. Same with migratory peoples into Europe. They often keep very much to themselves.
Would be great to see you hook up with Randall Carlson to compare some notes ♥️
Per a lot of the older historical records and paintings, the Eastern Steppe tribes like the Mongols were more Caucasian (blonde & light brown hair, blue eyes) prior to their conquest of China. When a land is conquered, each of the men often took home multiple young women as wives and concubines. And this of course will greatly change the genetics of a people, The historical records I am referring to are from several hundred years before the Mongol conquest of China and subsequent western expansion.
What about the gypsies?
Which YDNA group are we talking about...R1a....?
It WOULD be mind blowing
If Tiglath-Pileser III, an Assyrian conqueror in the 8th-century BCE, had taken European children as slaves and brought them back to his native country of northern Iraq, and if later these children (especially the male line) assimilated into the native culture and peoples, this will explain the haplogroup R1a2 that is prevalent in Assyrians today. It's all speculative and all very complicated.
Re-write history? I don't think that'll happen anytime soon.
💚💚💚
Wow @ about the 36:00 point. The tide is changing! Just wow. God is good
one of the disciples went to India he could have married an Indian woman or his child married an
Indian
I’m Mongolian
I come from my mommy and my daddy! The further back we go the small the number of ancestors and less branch, more trunk. Back to a simple deck hand shoveling animal waste on a wooden ship. Mongol? Maybe. Maybe not. If they are good looking and handsome, I can be Mongol.
Did this guy say foreign invasion doesn't exist ? Their all one "bloodline" anyway so foreign invasion is "just a family disagreement"
?
Peoples used to have darker skins including Asians even 200 years ago. Mahommed used to have red hair that's why some Arabs die their beards red. And evidently Genghis Khan did too. People in India say the Arians used to live in northern India. They taught them new ideas. When they date artifacts by the age and level of soil and even the part of an artifacts - they cannot say for 100% that that is the actual age of said artifacts - due to many reasons.
I wouldn't want to be of Mongolian decent only because the Hun was a vicious bloodthirsty brutal leader and I would feel generational shame. I don't think that would be the lineage God would choose. I want to believe that God would have humanity be less violent with each other, especially with a horde that does not advance God in any way, only conquest against others and violence.
Sorry, but I ain't reading that book unless it's not condensed then these videos, as interruptions and repeating
Lots of people....Eastern Europeans...even Russians. Heavy on Asian dna. As much as Northern Europeans w 1 - 4% Neanderthal dna.
What would Ken Ney think of Dr. Hugh Ross, and his Biblical & science outlook?
Does this new dna data impact our understanding of Rh- blood type?
If you have a basis DNA pattern for humans, how slight do the changes need to be, to create great variations?
Between 4:37 & 4:44 mins...
"A few hundred thousand years ago"?
This is a genuine mistake surely as a creationist, for 'adam goes back only 6000 years, and we are close to entering into the seventh thousandth year?
What should it be?
No. He clearly said that a few hundred thousand years “couldn’t be possible”. Rather than take the time to make the comment, use it to listen again
@@masonmaestro
I'm not too sure what you are getting at by having to listen again when you heard exectly what I did... a few hundred thoudand years...
Which is impossible if you believe in creation.
@pln, Based on the research of Steven Rudd of The Shiloh Excavations, who relies on the chronology of the patriarchs & timeline as recorded in the Septuagint LXX text (the Masorectic text would provide a negative variance of about 800 years), he calculated Creation date to be approximately 5554 BC. The age of planet Earth to-date would therefore be: 5554 BC + 2023 AD = 7,577 years old.
Btw, the Great Flood happened in 3298 BC. The destruction of the Tower of Babel was in 2850 BC. Hence, any claim to-date of any written text found that is older than 5,300 years old would be incorrect & unacceptable. The only probable oldest written text that could be claimed to have been found to-date is about 4,873 years old to be acceptable. Bear this in mind, people, when you come across such claims so true history is not corrupted.
@masonmaestro I did listen to it again, at least two times, and still got the same.
He doesn't speak very clearly, but runs his words together like a lot of people these days
yes I did go back and then had to put the subtitles on, because I missed the "if".
But what a disgusting comment you made to me,.."but rather than take the time to make the comment".
Was that rudeness really necessary?
@@iaam8141
Thank you for your comment. Was he not speaking of ancestry rather than the earth? I believe we haven't entered into the seventh thousandth year after 'Adam and Chawwah were made, as we are not in the millennium yet, and that's still man, not earth.
We know that 6 is the number of man, and seven is YHWH's number.
My comment was based on the understanding that he was speaking of ancestry; for what I believe concerning the age of the earth is far greater as well.
Thanks, very "well put" comment.
Mongols are not European. Your theory makes no sense. Indians are Caucasian.
Where did you get your PHD..??
Indians from India are considered Caucasians. I looked it up.
Oxford😊
Indians are not pure Caucasians. They are obviously a mix of a little bit of ererything. Mongols are no Europeans, right. They're Asians.
I don't believe he said Mongols are Europeans. He said some Europeans are of Mongolian descent.