ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
A Shocking Truth About Europe and India (Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson & Ken Ham)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 เม.ย. 2020
- India and Europe, two very separate civilizations...right? When the East India Company arrived on the shores of India in 1600, two ancient civilizations met for the first time in thousands of years. Or so we’ve thought. Genetics reveals a much more recent connection between the Indian subcontinent and Europe. Tune in to uncover the shocking link!
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenes...
![LISA - NEW WOMAN feat. Rosalía (Official Music Video) reaction [NEW LEVEL!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BcppQEBJzEA/mqdefault.jpg)
![ออกพรรษาน้ำตาหล่น - แอน อรดี [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PFZtOcY9ONA/mqdefault.jpg)
This series is both fascinating and extremely frustrating. The frustration comes in where I'm finding that the episodes are basically half recaps of the prior episodes. I'm trying to watch the series as it's 2 years old, and I'm trying to watch the videos one after the other sequentially. But I'm getting to a point in the seventh episode I've got a fast forward through half of it to get to the new stuff. I realize you can't fix the old episodes but I hope you take this into effect with new material you might publish.
Yes, a LOT of repetition and really little extra information, especially in this episode.
So I support your request.
The re-caps were valuable in the original airing. You seem to be smart enough to skip through to the new information. If you're frustrated, I guess that's your own personal problem because I can fast-forward without getting frustrated. However, perhaps they will find a way to take your suggestion into account in the future. We would all benefit from that when watching these videos after the initial airing. Best wishes to you.
@@kathyh.1720 When the recaps take up a third of the show, that's just bad programming.
@@820hurleyj We're all entitled to our opinions. You're certainly free to have your view.
On the other hand, other people are entitled to their own opinions, and they are also free to have their own views. Apparently the programmers saw a need for the recaps.
On the third hand--uh, wait, I need to borrow someone's hand for this--in teaching, repetition scattered throughout the learning process is an excellent method. It reinforces what was taught previously. (Can't remember the name of the book that wrote about this, where they studied this and shown it to be correct. Only remember that the book had a blue cover and that one of the authors was Henry L. Roediger III.)
Kenites aka Cain descendants existed post flood, easy to research online, this presentation is an exercise in death by powerpoint. Clearly if Kenites existed there were more than the three sons of Noah walking the Earth.
God bless your ministry AIG and thank you for your truth!
This all makes much more sense than what we have been told by mainstream.
Sometimes the comments left here are confusing..
someone from Answers in Genesis should read them & point out potential errors
to other readers & make corrections...if possible..
we would be unable to correct all of them on our own..without the help of
the staff of Answers in Genesis..thank you.
Paul talked about going to Spain well over 500 years ago.
My father found his 10th cousin in Germany. Our family name ancestral home is there and there are various locations there named after us.
Is the sample size large enough to ensure you have an accurate result for a date 500 years ago?
You should read the Mahavamsa. It’s the chronicle of Sri Lanka. We have a written history of more than 2500 years. It states that the sinhalese descended from the aryan clan from nothern India. The Aryans migrated from the Indus valley north towards the Ural mountains and got divided, some went to Europe the others came south to north India and then to Sri Lanka. North Indians and the Sinhalese have a lot in common and the south Indians are a different race known as Dravidians or Tamils. That too explains how Europeans and some South Asians are related. We’ve also intermingled with the Tamils quite a lot for ages.
@ Raash Perera
The 1000 genome project saw samples taken from Gujaratis (US), South Indian Telugus (UK), SriLanka Tamils(UK) and Bengalis(Bangladesh). It showed a link between South Asia and Eastern Europe(R1aydna), and with Southern Europe(J2ydna).
R1a ydna associated with Indo-Aryans is found in both North Indians and South Indians .
Aryans have nothing to do with the Indus Valley . Neolithic farmers from Iran are associated with the spread of Dravidian languages among the Brahui population of Pakistan and South Indian populations.
J2 ydna is found among the Brahui of Pakistan as well as South Indians.
J2 ydna found in Southern Europe/Middle-East is found in South Indian castes , North Indian castes and Pakistan .
There is no significant presence of J2 ydna among Sinhalese unlike its presence in South and North Indians.
what u did to Tamilians is coming back to haunt Lankans
Classic exponential distribution in your charts.
Mind blowing 🤯
had mine done and no asian or african in my dna. im ethnic german
I think they are talking about further back as if tracing ancient origins that people only get to see from the Y chromosome, if male and if female Maternal dna (MtDNA)
Have you watched the previous episodes??
It's a good thing they put the Finish in the tree. Otherwise, it wouldn't be Finished. :-)
Ken said incorrectly, "according to the Bible, Noah's Flood was about 4300 years ago." To be more biblically accurate, the Flood was 7011 years ago (in 4990 BC). Ken, please abandon Bishop Ussher's incorrect geological dates and stop using them in your publications. They are wrong. The simple pamphlet titled "The Biblical Calendar of History" works through the Genesis calendar and immediately dispels Ussher's erroneous dating of the Genesis patriarchs. These were not father/son timelines, as Ussher thought, but a calendar of lifespans used as calendar references. Thus, to reference a point in history, the ancients could say, "in the 355 year of Methuselah, such and such happened," which is not unlike our saying, "in the 1492 year of our Lord."
So, the Bible gives exact dates for significant events that Answers in Genesis should know, teach, and be the authority on rather than holding and spreading misinformation. Please, do a little research and become informed.
💜💜💜
Lost Ancestors?
O these jesuits are going to love that you said that about degrading from fallen Adam
they are blocking the reply lol
Stop stop stop starting all over again please !
Hey I'm from Barbados...we pronounce it Bar-Bay-Dose lol not Bar-Bay-Daws
If someone wanted to contribute to the DNA testing and direct it to you, how would they do that. I've no interest in supplying DNA to ancestry or the rest of the nonsense, but would love to be included in this project
Your findings are compelling, it’s exactly in theory to what the Bible teaches, your time lines are wrong (table of nations) although your length of acceleration is correct, (6 day creation of ‘man’s home’ and approximately 6000 year from 2 til now) you can’t just throw out written history archeological excavations or and especially Biblical history, historically NAMED empires did exist and the time lines, (from the rise til the fall )are recorded history! There is a lot to square here, but genetic expressions are bake in by God and have nothing to do with race but time in clan dictated by environmental conditions that includes 3 1/2 dimensions and time in grade(locality coupled with innovation)
But how is this relevant to your argument? It matters more to people who still think for themselves, who say with a Russian author: "I agree with no man's opinions. I have some of my own." People with BRAINS.
Make a movie out of this, this teasing long draw out repeating can drive one to Never watch another one of these videos !
Love it! What can I say! I listened to all that they had to share. Of course, we are all related. We all go back to Adam and Eve. Apostle Paul says we are of one blood!
Interesting... You guys should also run control tests on a few other species. So you can compare their y-chromosome results with people. Perhaps in the same general areas of people being tested.
a gross misrepresentation, with extreme bias, from a limited study
It's sad he is allegedly a doctor
For me, (I’m atheist) all this that you are saying is new knowledge, is not at all new. It seems like it’s the creationists that didn’t and doesn’t understand how it all works. A lot of things that you bring up like the maths for relatives are totaly wrong. Before we travelled like we do know we of course married much closer relatives and that is not strange… It’s not like it was 4-5 steps away but maybe 12-13 and that works just fine. The vary strange thing is that you say you are educated, but you just seem to make up stuff to fit your narrative, or at least bring forth information that you think will benefit the narrative. There is so many wrongs in this hole series that it’s crazy and it only shows ignorance and you trying to spread totaly bias information. Shame on you!!
I am not an atheist but I agree with you. He is doing exactly what he is accusing the Evolutionist for doing. Trying to force the data to suit his theory. Sphinx is older than Biblical Creation. So what's his explanation for G.Tepe in Turkey or God forbid the Bosnian Pyramid ( even though there's a lot of controversy about it from mainstream scientists )...
@@theunknownfragment5473 He was right about some, because there was a big human population size drop 75k years ago (about only 15k survived), + Y chromosome could find the common ancestors of two different ethnic by examine the mutation differences, since it will be a lot clearer than uses both X and Y genes, scientist even could predict (from number of common ancestors) if there was population drop (famine genocide etc.) to any of these groups, e.g. if the Y chromosome mutations are less that what should be that sign of population drop.
BTW, I don't believe in Noah/Adam etc. but I think what he's saying are true human population did not increased much in ancient time, human were in edge of extinct multiple times, that why you see more related genes than what we expected from supposedly to be 200k year of human existing.
Well this is interesting but unfortunately it cannot be relied upon because of the obvious bias. We need verification from an unbiased researcher.
take my DNA then.....you'll find i'm NOT related to you or a guy from Lyon or Napoli etc etc ..even if you do go back to 1500.