Absolutely! It is in my AI trends for 2025 and I have also just done another stand along video on this important topic. Let me know your thoughts on them.
Fantastic! Your mention of Hyper-Automation struck me as it has been a topic I find interesting recently. But don’t you think management might find it threatening at some point, if all of the company’s vital information or data in every department flow seamlessly. I mean, what if the employee in charge of this operation decides to leave the company tomorrow? He has access to the backbone of the company (Data Security)? I would like to know your take on this, please.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! You’ve touched on a critical issue-one that I believe many leaders and organizations are grappling with as they adopt hyper-automation. It’s true that having seamless data flows across departments could make management feel exposed, especially if a key employee with deep access to data infrastructure were to leave. However, the strength of hyper-automation lies in its ability to reduce reliance on individuals and instead create robust, secure, and auditable processes. A well-implemented system should include safeguards like role-based access control, multi-level security, and automated oversight mechanisms to ensure that no single employee has excessive power or control. In this way, even if someone leaves, the company remains secure and operational. The real challenge for management is not just in trusting the technology but also in building a resilient organizational structure that minimizes single points of failure, both human and technological. What are your thoughts on ensuring management buy-in while addressing these concerns?
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! You’ve touched on a critical issue-one that I believe many leaders and organizations are grappling with as they adopt hyper-automation. It’s true that having seamless data flows across departments could make management feel exposed, especially if a key employee with deep access to data infrastructure were to leave. However, the strength of hyper-automation lies in its ability to reduce reliance on individuals and instead create robust, secure, and auditable processes. A well-implemented system should include safeguards like role-based access control, multi-level security, and automated oversight mechanisms to ensure that no single employee has excessive power or control. In this way, even if someone leaves, the company remains secure and operational. The real challenge for management is not just in trusting the technology but also in building a resilient organizational structure that minimizes single points of failure, both human and technological. What are your thoughts on ensuring management buy-in while addressing these concerns?
I am waiting for the discussion, that well researched AI decision and simulation models will be developed for governance, i.e. politics, and one day even take over corrupt, selfish and populistic politics.
Great video......How about health care AI in 2025 ??
Absolutely! It is in my AI trends for 2025 and I have also just done another stand along video on this important topic. Let me know your thoughts on them.
Fantastic!
Your mention of Hyper-Automation struck me as it has been a topic I find interesting recently.
But don’t you think management might find it threatening at some point, if all of the company’s vital information or data in every department flow seamlessly.
I mean, what if the employee in charge of this operation decides to leave the company tomorrow?
He has access to the backbone of the company (Data Security)?
I would like to know your take on this, please.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! You’ve touched on a critical issue-one that I believe many leaders and organizations are grappling with as they adopt hyper-automation. It’s true that having seamless data flows across departments could make management feel exposed, especially if a key employee with deep access to data infrastructure were to leave.
However, the strength of hyper-automation lies in its ability to reduce reliance on individuals and instead create robust, secure, and auditable processes. A well-implemented system should include safeguards like role-based access control, multi-level security, and automated oversight mechanisms to ensure that no single employee has excessive power or control. In this way, even if someone leaves, the company remains secure and operational.
The real challenge for management is not just in trusting the technology but also in building a resilient organizational structure that minimizes single points of failure, both human and technological. What are your thoughts on ensuring management buy-in while addressing these concerns?
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! You’ve touched on a critical issue-one that I believe many leaders and organizations are grappling with as they adopt hyper-automation. It’s true that having seamless data flows across departments could make management feel exposed, especially if a key employee with deep access to data infrastructure were to leave.
However, the strength of hyper-automation lies in its ability to reduce reliance on individuals and instead create robust, secure, and auditable processes. A well-implemented system should include safeguards like role-based access control, multi-level security, and automated oversight mechanisms to ensure that no single employee has excessive power or control. In this way, even if someone leaves, the company remains secure and operational.
The real challenge for management is not just in trusting the technology but also in building a resilient organizational structure that minimizes single points of failure, both human and technological. What are your thoughts on ensuring management buy-in while addressing these concerns?
Oo
I am waiting for the discussion, that well researched AI decision and simulation models will be developed for governance, i.e. politics, and one day even take over corrupt, selfish and populistic politics.
So informative, thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
বুঝিনু!
😊
Zsq