Hudson never betrayed his comrades Mads respected for him. He is the reason David Mason was saved and also sacrificed himself too Wood shouldn’t blame on him.
Nahhh I still blame him for the death of Mason remember when Kravchenko said there was a CIA mole why was he getting all defensive and was getting suspicious also remember the mission in Nirigua when Woods throws a grenate and Hudson lies that Mendez is in the body bag so no I blame Hudson 100%
@@nastydylanhdgaming7821 There are plenty of explanations for those: for one thing, he works closely with the CIA. He trusts his colleagues, he respects them. The thought that any of them could be a traitor, is preposterous to him. Hudson did not lie about Menendez's "death", they all believed he was dead but Menednez survived and escaped custody. That is why Operation Panama happened, not only to capture Noreiga but also to track Mendenze. Remember, Woods and Mason found out he was still alive after the Nicaragua mission.
@@TOXICYT2016 The only "deal" Hudson made was to trick Woods to kill Mason, purely because he wanted to save David. Menendez kidnapped David and threatened to kill him if Hudson did not cooperate. Hudson chose to save his friend's son over himself, Mason, and Woods.
Jane Harrow was the mole in the CIA, got wind of Hudson digging his nose where it wasn't supposed to be, wanted Menendez to take care of Hudson as a loose end to cover her tracks, is part of a paramilitary who's plan was to use a biochemical weapon against the US government, and had Case as maybe a sleeper agent within the Black Ops team, I'm sorry but I gotta say it, she kinda hot doe.
I Feel Bad For Jason Hudson 😥 Jason Hudson Dead By Raul Menendez Jason Hudson Leaving his Family Behind: Older Brother, Jenny Hudson Wife and Two Kids.
@@nguyenphucminhkhoi1912 Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
Personally, as much as I like BO2, I wish Cold War and BO6 were used to create a split timeline, one that leads up to the future we see in the rebooted Modern Warfare games. Keep much of the events surrounding 1986 - 1989 the same, but have it end where Adler is able to kill Menendez before he could escape, but not in time to save Mason or Hudson.
You have to consider that raul gave woods the chance to kill david, hudson or himself, so maybe hudson wasn't a necessary kill for pantheon, but hudson himself asked to be killed so that was an added bonus. alex had to die because he was the key factor to make David, hudson and woods suffer, so he wasn't collateral.
menendez would probably still kill hudson either way. in my opinion, he was just torturing woods more by giving him the ilussion that he could save hudson.
@enriquepowers no, it was not because he didn't know about the sister and he didn't know about the grenade, which would have honestly got him to if alex didn't catch woods arms, and not only that, but a brutal death like that is still not deserved, even if he stopped him from getting his sister Besides if he didn't stop him he would have died and had NO revenge So uh No
I absolutely loved this campaign, I personally loved it more than Cold war, even though its the most complex story we had since BO3 but unlike that campaign which I really enjoyed ( and over the years I've started to understand and appreciate the story even more and realized how genuisTreyarch were in creating such a complex story), BO6 is much easier to follow than most people think if they really pay attention to the story. You find out in emergence and the last mission that Pantheon was originally a special activities division within the CIA and hated the agency (CIA) due to the corruption and horrible secrets they have been hiding such as the killing of Jane Harrow's parents and also the death of the brother of Jackson Caine which caused his ideologies to shift and got recruited by Pantheon. ( This information is in his multiplayer bio) Hearing Adler talk about Hudson made his death all the more Tragic because just like how Woods doesn't like Hudson, some of the COD community does not like hi either they kept calling him a traitor and a liar and the mole and now we know that he was aware of Pantheon and tried to put a stop to it before Menendez got to him. Poor Hudson man🤧.
They set up a plan to make Adler as a scapegoat by putting Menendez's cash in his bank account and Hudson looks strict but he is a good guy in fact he had a doubt but Pantheon knew they need to act quick 😢
People forgot jason death in black ops 2 as well but I wish we definitely could've played a backstory in the campaign or something but the infro in this might be something
This would’ve been a nice plug up had this explanation came after BO2. If a mole was in the CIA I’m sure Hudson would’ve made it his top priority to find out who the mole is. Any other Ops would but at further unnecessary risk with a gaping leak in the system!
The prologue mission should have been the Panama mission from blops 2 just with the updated story plots. Like play the entire mission from masons pov. Right till before he gets shot then it should switch to woods and have you shoot mason. Then The whole Menendez cutscene with hudson and woods.
I guess Hudson started having his suspiscions about Pantheon's existence if the events took place from BO2 where Kravchenko tells them that Menendez had people within the CIA working with him, and the folder was found in compund in Nicaragua, and if these events took place cannonically this also would add confirmation that Mason would still be alive.
@@MaskedRider_FAIZI REALLY wish what you said would be true. Sadly, even Tryarch confirms the canon timeline, and that Mason is CANONCIALLY dead, as terrible as it is. Wouldve loved to see him between the years of him being absent
You know, if Pantheon was an American version of Perseus like rogue CIA Black Ops team who wanted to not only to take down Perseus, but also to remove all of America's enemies with The Cradle instead of attacking US, the story would have been more believable
Gray characters like Hudson are one of the reason why we did care Black Ops campaign. After BO6, I feel bad for him now to die in such a brutal way (after doubting his goal and motivation for a long time in and after BO2)
It’s crazy to see that a character the OG’s remembered turns out *was not* a traitor; and instead, lead down to a rabbit hole that was this game. Proper stuff. 4:37 *Woods** is in that chair. Fixed that for you, chief.
What doesn't add up for me is if Hudson was the one that informed Adler about the CIA being infiltrated why did he immediately shut down Kravchenko when he told him, Mason and Woods about Menendez having people in the CIA?
Because that part takes place 3 years before the Panama mission and Adler says Hudson told him weeks before the Panama invasion so Hudson probably investigated in between that time
@Tanarnick was it? I thought all of it was the same year aside from the first mission where we rescue Woods from Angola. My bad then I stand corrected.
As much as I like Black Ops 2, they really did write themselves into a corner by telling the final mission of the original team (Mason, Woods, and Hudson) in their 2nd installment. So much so that Cold War and BO6 had to become interquels just to fit into the timeline. It makes me wonder if the 7th installment will go back to the 70s or continue on in the 90s.
black ops 7 will be futue setting that will be follow up to bo2 future setting like how cold war was follow up of black ops 1 as black ops 6 is follow up of cold war
@@Wolverine1992-z5m One of my problems with Black Ops 2 was that killing off Alex Mason felt too soon. In the sense I felt like we needed one more game with him before his death. But Cold War ended up giving us that, so it feels more complete. If one was to play BO1, then Cold War, and go directly into BO2, you have a more fulfilling story. But I still think they should do another game set in the 70s, maybe even have us play as Woods as he escapes from captivity. As a way to showcase each decade and reveal to us certain events that BO1 and BO2 references in between.
@@tjjordan4207 I think my problem with Cold War and Black ops 6 is that the original crew from the first 2 Black ops games is like they don't belong in these new installments. We don't get to play as with Mason, Hudson and Woods story. BO2 only had flashbacks to 80s. Cold war was the direct sequel to BO1 but then again our protagonists over there falls short to the point they are removable and the story wouldn't be different. It feels completely disconnect since you have now new characters that fits into a new crew like Sims and Adler and somewhat a completely muted protagonist on which it takes away a lot of traits that the original crew brought to us. Playing BO2 flashbacks after Cold war makes it a little bit fulfilling but still way too short of a time with the original crew. A game that shows the 70s would have been great, because we could play in the last days in Vietnam and other scenarios that happened in the 70s as well. BO6 also is so disconnected, the new group created and characters just to find someone to blame for panama it feels disjointed of what the first 2 games estabilished. Again to blame someone from Panama it would have been a lot great if it was an actual character that was in the second game.
So im guessing david was with Jenny duri the events of bo6 and im getting a feeling as they have de canonized the events of black ops 2 2025 timeline do you think there's a possibility we might se some retcons like David's age and a rematch between raul menandez?
After playing the BO6 campaign I think that Harrow has DID after witnessing her parents being murdered with her main alter being the Harrow that looks like the Spanish ghost like sailor from the most recent Pirates of the Caribbean movie. Where that alter is driven by revenge since from what she was told is that the CIA ordered her parents death and she wanted to join the CIA to take them down from the inside. This is just my theory.
Hudson and weever are the best black ops character and I was so sad when them took got killed I believe Jane ordered the attack on mason because she knows he killed her mother and father mason killed her father and mother
Funny how people go all out with crazy theories, when it's all just a weird retcon to cover up a small plothole. Back in BO2, Hudson was considered the mole within the CIA: reaction at the terrorist cave, the papers, the odd comms in Panama, his defense while tied to a chair. Everything lined up perfectly except for one small thing that wasn't so clear: his true reasons. Let's remember that Treyarch had not only one, but actually FOUR opportunities (BO3, BO4, CW and WZ1) to develop his character and chose not to, instead promoting new faces like Adler, Park, Sims and so many others just for them to end up making a quick cameo in BO6 and sell skins. And the community is actually giving them ideas now by writing theories when they don't even know what or where to look further. Hudson is, unfortunately, just a piece in a weak script left 12 years ago. So weak, that Treyarch took the liberty to rewrite part of what made BO2 so impactful. Oh and let's remember, this game had 4 years of development, and yet they went with nostalgia and zombie hallucinations bs.
The problem with the original crew is that originally they come up with only 2 games and the second game being just flashbacks of it. BO3 and BO4 came out and I refuse to believe those games are canon. Because they don't stretch anything that fits into our timeline. Black ops franchise tried to do a comeback with Cold war, but they never set up with the characters traits within the original crew. Cold war is a great interquel to BO1/BO2 (1986) timeline except that it doesn't promote the main characters of the previous games to it. That's why it feels odd, BO6 doesn't even show a flashback to Panama's events. Part of what we wanted in Black ops sequels is the original crew from Black ops 1 and Black ops 1986 being in somewhat of a trilogy with the 4 characters that were the main team being represented and showed the reasons to each significant change in the story instead of shoving anyone new. Like they did a excuse as for why Mason and Woods never met Adler in Vietnam and there alone doesn't relate our characters very well with the new ones.
So the Black Ops Timeline goes: Waw BO1 BO: Declassified BO: Cold War BO2 (Flashbacks) BO6 BO2 (2025) BO4 BO3 Numbering system in these games is something else lol
A black ops film is long overdue and actually looks nothing like what we know (the film that is due to be released some time next year ) it's got Dwayne Johnson in it but it looks weird,my imagination is some top rated actors playing legendary Cia characters and Benfico del Toro as menendez would be great I watched him in snatch as Frankie four fingers and sicario ,,Mel Gibson as frank woods , Ed Harris as Hudson ,rob Redford as Adler and I believe they should bring Sam Worthington to reprise the role of Alex would be awesome but this new film I believe is based around modern warfare not Black ops which is disapointing😢
@@timur5219 treyarch confrimed that player shoot mason in the head is canon choice since alex mason is mention by woods an alder mention husdon an mason too
I played BO6. It's quite good👍. Although it's confusing!😒 But, I am quite disappointed that we couldn't able to to enjoy the level historical authenticity in the new game. It's gulf war missions could be the only closes things to real life, but they are too heavily fictionalised! 😮💨
When i played BO2, i shot Mason in the leg and he survived. i know there were multiple ending tho. however, was there an official ending on BO2 that involves Mason dying ?
The whole pantheon 💩 kinda ruins the ambiguity of bo2 we never knew who the mole was .just flat out telling us there was a whole group behind it is lame
I hate that. Changing something 12 years later is so unnecessary, and that's not taking into consideration that this had very little relevance to the plot in BO6. Imagine playing through the black ops series, and then in the 6th installment and they add on to the 2nd installment's story for no reason? The writing in BO6 is so bad it's not even funny.
Funny how loosely connected this things are. It somehow feels realistic with how fked up the world are where the enemies surround 1 nation that has their own goals and agenda.
We all thought it was only Raul who did it when really Hudson’s people wanted it to look like it Raul and Hudson’s people wanted him dead,my advice to people who have not played this game is to be careful there playing a game and they don’t even know the rules (dirty players on their side)
Adler was the scape goat for putting Woods in wheel chair weeks before the Panama mission Hudson told Adler about pantheon so Adler from the shadows been hunting Pantheon
Hudson was the mole, but now he isn't because(12 years later) BO6 needs to make another character for that story beat. Lmao and I'm betting they will bring back Mason when they need more content in the future.
They always left an opening for mason to come back. The multiple endings in bo2 the truth lies slogan for bo6 using bo2 footage of mason falling after being shot in the leg versus the one where he was shot in the head. I figured he’d be left outta this game but depending on time period for the next black ops I think mason makes a return
@@trilogy3xMason is presumed dead in Black ops 6! As the "The Truth Lies" played the cutscenes where Mason got shot in the leg also there's an explanation of player choose to Shoot Mason on legs it might be considered a mistake on bullet calculation and let's be honest even in Black ops 2 Mason was considered Dead until he showed up in 2025 depending upon the player and endings
(I've already posted this in a later video, but I was planning on posting this comment on this video before the next video popped up. So, ...here it is) I've never played this game (I'm going cold turkey on Call of Duty and I have no intention of playing CoD ever again due to how scummy Activision is before and after the Microsoft acquisition). After watching campaign videos and seeing how Pantheon was possibly (and most likely) the ones who aided Raul Menendez in kidnapping the young David Mason and forcing Jason Hudson to sell out Alex Mason and Frank Woods to Menendez, I feel the need to throw my hat in the ring regarding their motivations. Since Pantheon and their branch in the Advanced Technologies and Applications program was shut down by Daniel Livingstone after 1981, they sought revenge against the CIA director. However, since they were officially shut down by the CIA, Pantheon looked to the criminal underworld to finance and continue their plans, such as the crime factions in Avalon (discount Monaco) and Raul Menendez. Hudson corroborates the testimony from Kravchenko regarding moles in the CIA with the CIA memo Mason found in Menendez's compound in Nicaragua, eventually discovering Pantheon. Pantheon knew that Hudson, as well as Adler, Mason, and Woods by extension, would do everything in their power to stop the organization's plans, so they (or at the very least Hudson and Adler) needed to go. They get in contact with Raul Menendez, who wanted revenge against Woods, Mason, and Hudson for their roles in Josefina's death, and, seeing that their interests align, has David kidnapped and given to Menendez (as for what happened to Hudson's wife Jenny and their two kids, that's unknown, but we may have to fear the worst) Following the disaster at Panama, Pantheon frames Adler as the mole, essentially killing two (or four) birds with one stone. From there, Pantheon focused their efforts in unleashing the Cradle in Washington D.C., which would tarnish Livingstone's reputation and allow Jane Harrow to take control of the CIA and use it as seen fit by the shadow organization. In short, their deal with Menendez in Panama was a matter of convenience. Giving David to Menendez was just a way to get to Hudson; and leveraging Hudson was just a way to get rid of both him, Mason, Woods, and Adler; and getting rid of all four of the CIA Special Activities Division operatives would allow them to focus their efforts to get who they wanted out of the CIA director's position. With this whole scenario, Pantheon seem reminiscent to Megiddo from Splinter Cell: Conviction. Much like Megiddo, Pantheon is a shadow organization with international reach. Much like Megiddo in SC: Conviction, Pantheon felt Livingstone, by shutting them down in '81, would leave America vulnerable to threats similar to the ones Dragovich and Perseus posed to the nation. Their plan to unleash the Cradle in the Capitol Building would have not only ruined Livingstone, but it would also act as a way to gain support from the American people regarding what decisions Pantheon made through Harrow - the attack would have been a wake-up call to the American people that, even if the Cold War was over and the Soviet Union was dissolved, there would still be threats and attacks that could happen anywhere to anyone at anytime; that they need to remain vigilant and need a Pantheon-controlled CIA to keep the United States safe. While it may have been a shame to them to waste talented operatives like Mason, Hudson, Woods, and Adler, they most likely saw them as four "self-righteous homicidal maniacs" that they could find anytime they need some. To Pantheon, Livingstone, Hudson, Mason, Woods, and Adler were mere inconveniences to Pantheon - they weren't even people in their eyes.
I'll be honest here I like the word honest bo2 campaign is was a masterpiece the way jason hudson died it was nasty woods mason hudson mission is to capture Raul not his sister to be fair woods kill Raul sister with his grenade one of the most shocking moments in black ops history the bo2 campaign wasn't trash it was something else Raul wanted to get revenge for his sister he would had the chance to kill woods he had him right there as he wanted but he refused to kill woods in that scene watching raul talking to david if I was Raul in bo2 i would of killed woods for killing my sister i don't like it when you have to shoot mason in the head it really sucks though to save him shoot him in the leg is the best options for him to see his son David mason Raul did woods mason hudson dirty in that scene where he all wanted them at his place I understand that woods didn't know that raul sister was in her room but it was his fault that he killed her with his grenade that's what happens if you kill someone family in the game no matter what that villain will always comes for you
What an absolute mind numbing, boring, pointless campaign black ops 6 was. Had absolute no benefit towards the call of duty saga, And the fact people still play this games and waste their lives on it, Is even worse. When you go back and replay waw or bo1 campaign you realize what a difference it is, Especially these new open world mission they started doing, where you are a lone wolf aswell, a one man army, Crap
Bro what it's not guy fall I mean you can not to watch the video and not get spoilers so don't blame the guy cuz he make the video I don't want to be rude or mean.
Hudson never betrayed his comrades Mads respected for him. He is the reason David Mason was saved and also sacrificed himself too Wood shouldn’t blame on him.
Nahhh I still blame him for the death of Mason remember when Kravchenko said there was a CIA mole why was he getting all defensive and was getting suspicious also remember the mission in Nirigua when Woods throws a grenate and Hudson lies that Mendez is in the body bag so no I blame Hudson 100%
@nastydylanhdgaming7821 Maybe hudson made a deal with menendez after he got his dad killed
@@nastydylanhdgaming7821 There are plenty of explanations for those: for one thing, he works closely with the CIA. He trusts his colleagues, he respects them. The thought that any of them could be a traitor, is preposterous to him. Hudson did not lie about Menendez's "death", they all believed he was dead but Menednez survived and escaped custody. That is why Operation Panama happened, not only to capture Noreiga but also to track Mendenze. Remember, Woods and Mason found out he was still alive after the Nicaragua mission.
@@TOXICYT2016 The only "deal" Hudson made was to trick Woods to kill Mason, purely because he wanted to save David. Menendez kidnapped David and threatened to kill him if Hudson did not cooperate. Hudson chose to save his friend's son over himself, Mason, and Woods.
Jane Harrow was the mole in the CIA, got wind of Hudson digging his nose where it wasn't supposed to be, wanted Menendez to take care of Hudson as a loose end to cover her tracks, is part of a paramilitary who's plan was to use a biochemical weapon against the US government, and had Case as maybe a sleeper agent within the Black Ops team, I'm sorry but I gotta say it, she kinda hot doe.
Lmao she is 🤣 but I thought that was pretty interesting
@@BranWolfYT it's very interesting tbh.
Looks like CARTEL MOMMY has some competition now 😏
@@markperacullo7541 100% 🤣
Wow anyone like valeria so much 😅@markperacullo7541
I Feel Bad For Jason Hudson 😥 Jason Hudson Dead By Raul Menendez Jason Hudson Leaving his Family Behind: Older Brother, Jenny Hudson Wife and Two Kids.
Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
😭
@@nguyenphucminhkhoi1912 Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
Who's jenny hudson
@@David-vd9sb literally said his wife
Always loved hudson, as Adler says "the man may be a pain, but hes no fool"
Everyone saying Menendez should've been in BO6 dont realize that Kamar De Los Reyes died dueing the making of the game thats why Menendez aint in it
such a shame ☹️ the black ops franchise will never be the same without him RIP Kamar 💔
Ah yeah, because COD's known for using the same actors..
No in bo2 it said that he was in hiding until 2014
Personally, as much as I like BO2, I wish Cold War and BO6 were used to create a split timeline, one that leads up to the future we see in the rebooted Modern Warfare games. Keep much of the events surrounding 1986 - 1989 the same, but have it end where Adler is able to kill Menendez before he could escape, but not in time to save Mason or Hudson.
@@tjjordan4207actually There's a reference in Black ops 6 which is somewhat linked to Kate laswell
You have to consider that raul gave woods the chance to kill david, hudson or himself, so maybe hudson wasn't a necessary kill for pantheon, but hudson himself asked to be killed so that was an added bonus. alex had to die because he was the key factor to make David, hudson and woods suffer, so he wasn't collateral.
menendez would probably still kill hudson either way. in my opinion, he was just torturing woods more by giving him the ilussion that he could save hudson.
Raul gave hudson the chance for him to decide who gets shot though. "Woods i got 2 kids.. fuck it kill me"-hudson
@ronaldespinoza6699 yeah that's nothing to be thankful about
Jason did not deserve to die such a brutal death.
yeah it was brutal
True but he kinda had it coming since he stopped Menendez from reaching his sister in time
@enriquepowers no, it was not because he didn't know about the sister and he didn't know about the grenade, which would have honestly got him to if alex didn't catch woods arms, and not only that, but a brutal death like that is still not deserved, even if he stopped him from getting his sister
Besides if he didn't stop him he would have died and had NO revenge
So uh
No
The worse death in cod saga 😭😭, after bowman
I absolutely loved this campaign, I personally loved it more than Cold war, even though its the most complex story we had since BO3 but unlike that campaign which I really enjoyed ( and over the years I've started to understand and appreciate the story even more and realized how genuisTreyarch were in creating such a complex story), BO6 is much easier to follow than most people think if they really pay attention to the story.
You find out in emergence and the last mission that Pantheon was originally a special activities division within the CIA and hated the agency (CIA) due to the corruption and horrible secrets they have been hiding such as the killing of Jane Harrow's parents and also the death of the brother of Jackson Caine which caused his ideologies to shift and got recruited by Pantheon. ( This information is in his multiplayer bio)
Hearing Adler talk about Hudson made his death all the more Tragic because just like how Woods doesn't like Hudson, some of the COD community does not like hi either they kept calling him a traitor and a liar and the mole and now we know that he was aware of Pantheon and tried to put a stop to it before Menendez got to him. Poor Hudson man🤧.
They set up a plan to make Adler as a scapegoat by putting Menendez's cash in his bank account and Hudson looks strict but he is a good guy in fact he had a doubt but Pantheon knew they need to act quick 😢
Wish my boy Hudson didn't die
Fuck Hudson I don’t trust even Woods didn’t trust him
People forgot jason death in black ops 2 as well but I wish we definitely could've played a backstory in the campaign or something but the infro in this might be something
agreed
@@BranWolfYTHudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
@@BranWolfYT Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
Here for the longest time I thought Jason Hudson was the mole
Its either harrow or caine the guy in the end Scene who were the Mole in Panama
Definitely
Caine also leads Crimson which are apparently related to Pantheon, so...
@@timur5219 crimson one izs prt of cia
This would’ve been a nice plug up had this explanation came after BO2. If a mole was in the CIA I’m sure Hudson would’ve made it his top priority to find out who the mole is. Any other Ops would but at further unnecessary risk with a gaping leak in the system!
Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
The prologue mission should have been the Panama mission from blops 2 just with the updated story plots. Like play the entire mission from masons pov. Right till before he gets shot then it should switch to woods and have you shoot mason. Then The whole Menendez cutscene with hudson and woods.
I guess Hudson started having his suspiscions about Pantheon's existence if the events took place from BO2 where Kravchenko tells them that Menendez had people within the CIA working with him, and the folder was found in compund in Nicaragua, and if these events took place cannonically this also would add confirmation that Mason would still be alive.
Mason isn't alive
@@ITZCHELSEA2244 I'm not saying he is but, its still a possibility.
@@MaskedRider_FAIZI REALLY wish what you said would be true. Sadly, even Tryarch confirms the canon timeline, and that Mason is CANONCIALLY dead, as terrible as it is. Wouldve loved to see him between the years of him being absent
@@WWMorian "The Truth Lies"
@@ITZCHELSEA2244Mason is actually alive but Mason is presumed dead after 1989
I liked how We finally get background story on BO3 and B02 after Many years.
You know, if Pantheon was an American version of Perseus like rogue CIA Black Ops team who wanted to not only to take down Perseus, but also to remove all of America's enemies with The Cradle instead of attacking US, the story would have been more believable
cradle was use to make super soldier that how can can take beat more then other characters
Perhaps i treated you too harshly.jpg
i was hoping Menendez would've been a side villain in Black Ops 6
Same
Gray characters like Hudson are one of the reason why we did care Black Ops campaign. After BO6, I feel bad for him now to die in such a brutal way (after doubting his goal and motivation for a long time in and after BO2)
It’s crazy to see that a character the OG’s remembered turns out *was not* a traitor; and instead, lead down to a rabbit hole that was this game. Proper stuff.
4:37 *Woods** is in that chair. Fixed that for you, chief.
What doesn't add up for me is if Hudson was the one that informed Adler about the CIA being infiltrated why did he immediately shut down Kravchenko when he told him, Mason and Woods about Menendez having people in the CIA?
Because that part takes place 3 years before the Panama mission and Adler says Hudson told him weeks before the Panama invasion so Hudson probably investigated in between that time
Cause he believes the cia can’t be infiltrated also why are you focusing on Hudson woods is the one who kills him he’s the worst
@Tanarnick was it? I thought all of it was the same year aside from the first mission where we rescue Woods from Angola. My bad then I stand corrected.
@@xbacongrizzler6929 Yea, the afghanistan mission takes place in 1986 and Panama of course in 1989
Hudson respect buttom, he is the black ops core
RIP Hudson
Hudson was so badass as a character back then in Black Ops 1. What a waste...
3:45 This would make sense if it was Makarov's finance chick in MWIII
As much as I like Black Ops 2, they really did write themselves into a corner by telling the final mission of the original team (Mason, Woods, and Hudson) in their 2nd installment. So much so that Cold War and BO6 had to become interquels just to fit into the timeline. It makes me wonder if the 7th installment will go back to the 70s or continue on in the 90s.
black ops 7 will be futue setting that will be follow up to bo2 future setting like how cold war was follow up of black ops 1 as black ops 6 is follow up of cold war
@@Wolverine1992-z5m One of my problems with Black Ops 2 was that killing off Alex Mason felt too soon. In the sense I felt like we needed one more game with him before his death.
But Cold War ended up giving us that, so it feels more complete. If one was to play BO1, then Cold War, and go directly into BO2, you have a more fulfilling story.
But I still think they should do another game set in the 70s, maybe even have us play as Woods as he escapes from captivity. As a way to showcase each decade and reveal to us certain events that BO1 and BO2 references in between.
@@tjjordan4207 I think my problem with Cold War and Black ops 6 is that the original crew from the first 2 Black ops games is like they don't belong in these new installments.
We don't get to play as with Mason, Hudson and Woods story. BO2 only had flashbacks to 80s. Cold war was the direct sequel to BO1 but then again our protagonists over there falls short to the point they are removable and the story wouldn't be different. It feels completely disconnect since you have now new characters that fits into a new crew like Sims and Adler and somewhat a completely muted protagonist on which it takes away a lot of traits that the original crew brought to us.
Playing BO2 flashbacks after Cold war makes it a little bit fulfilling but still way too short of a time with the original crew. A game that shows the 70s would have been great, because we could play in the last days in Vietnam and other scenarios that happened in the 70s as well.
BO6 also is so disconnected, the new group created and characters just to find someone to blame for panama it feels disjointed of what the first 2 games estabilished. Again to blame someone from Panama it would have been a lot great if it was an actual character that was in the second game.
So im guessing david was with Jenny duri the events of bo6 and im getting a feeling as they have de canonized the events of black ops 2 2025 timeline do you think there's a possibility we might se some retcons like David's age and a rematch between raul menandez?
Mason in Coma , Wood got leg injured , Hudson died when his leg got mowled and get slit
After playing the BO6 campaign I think that Harrow has DID after witnessing her parents being murdered with her main alter being the Harrow that looks like the Spanish ghost like sailor from the most recent Pirates of the Caribbean movie. Where that alter is driven by revenge since from what she was told is that the CIA ordered her parents death and she wanted to join the CIA to take them down from the inside. This is just my theory.
She seems wanted vengeance against CIA but her jane parents hasn't done anything in CIA?
Why couldn’t have menendez just appeared in the campaign for 1 mission. Maybe he will appear in the warzone storyline?
Hudson and weever are the best black ops character and I was so sad when them took got killed I believe Jane ordered the attack on mason because she knows he killed her mother and father mason killed her father and mother
nop it was not alex mason or nether was alder it was one of people in peathon
Idk why but i always thought McKnight was the mole it was werid to me that he was there for one mission then disappeared
Funny how people go all out with crazy theories, when it's all just a weird retcon to cover up a small plothole.
Back in BO2, Hudson was considered the mole within the CIA: reaction at the terrorist cave, the papers, the odd comms in Panama, his defense while tied to a chair. Everything lined up perfectly except for one small thing that wasn't so clear: his true reasons.
Let's remember that Treyarch had not only one, but actually FOUR opportunities (BO3, BO4, CW and WZ1) to develop his character and chose not to, instead promoting new faces like Adler, Park, Sims and so many others just for them to end up making a quick cameo in BO6 and sell skins. And the community is actually giving them ideas now by writing theories when they don't even know what or where to look further.
Hudson is, unfortunately, just a piece in a weak script left 12 years ago. So weak, that Treyarch took the liberty to rewrite part of what made BO2 so impactful. Oh and let's remember, this game had 4 years of development, and yet they went with nostalgia and zombie hallucinations bs.
The problem with the original crew is that originally they come up with only 2 games and the second game being just flashbacks of it.
BO3 and BO4 came out and I refuse to believe those games are canon. Because they don't stretch anything that fits into our timeline.
Black ops franchise tried to do a comeback with Cold war, but they never set up with the characters traits within the original crew.
Cold war is a great interquel to BO1/BO2 (1986) timeline except that it doesn't promote the main characters of the previous games to it. That's why it feels odd, BO6 doesn't even show a flashback to Panama's events. Part of what we wanted in Black ops sequels is the original crew from Black ops 1 and Black ops 1986 being in somewhat of a trilogy with the 4 characters that were the main team being represented and showed the reasons to each significant change in the story instead of shoving anyone new.
Like they did a excuse as for why Mason and Woods never met Adler in Vietnam and there alone doesn't relate our characters very well with the new ones.
So the Black Ops Timeline goes:
Waw
BO1
BO: Declassified
BO: Cold War
BO2 (Flashbacks)
BO6
BO2 (2025)
BO4
BO3
Numbering system in these games is something else lol
I must ask out of curiosity Bran Wolf.
Were Jane's parents operatives of Pantheon and moles in the CIA?
i dont really know
Damn for so long i blamed Hudson as a rat but he not, i ashamed myself
@@muhammadanshari3931 it's okay it happens
Rip mi homie Hudson 🚬😥
@@soto9679 Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
straight up
Hudson was always part of the squad
A black ops film is long overdue and actually looks nothing like what we know (the film that is due to be released some time next year ) it's got Dwayne Johnson in it but it looks weird,my imagination is some top rated actors playing legendary Cia characters and Benfico del Toro as menendez would be great I watched him in snatch as Frankie four fingers and sicario ,,Mel Gibson as frank woods , Ed Harris as Hudson ,rob Redford as Adler and I believe they should bring Sam Worthington to reprise the role of Alex would be awesome but this new film I believe is based around modern warfare not Black ops which is disapointing😢
Not just Hudson, but Mason (Woods shot him, but he didn't want to)
Woods didn't know before it was too late (also depends whether the player shoots in the leg or in the head)
@@timur5219most probably there're explanation of Mason's survival such as bullet calculation
@@timur5219 treyarch confrimed that player shoot mason in the head is canon choice since alex mason is mention by woods an alder mention husdon an mason too
@@Wolverine1992-z5m I had a stroke trying to read this
I thought hudson was trying to save david and thats why he was the mole
i thought hudson was the mole?
Dude im glad adler wasnt the bad guy in this game hes the one the is needed for the team the hunter for those big war criminals
I played BO6. It's quite good👍. Although it's confusing!😒
But, I am quite disappointed that we couldn't able to to enjoy the level historical authenticity in the new game. It's gulf war missions could be the only closes things to real life, but they are too heavily fictionalised! 😮💨
When i played BO2, i shot Mason in the leg and he survived. i know there were multiple ending tho. however, was there an official ending on BO2 that involves Mason dying ?
The whole pantheon 💩 kinda ruins the ambiguity of bo2 we never knew who the mole was .just flat out telling us there was a whole group behind it is lame
Fr
I hate that. Changing something 12 years later is so unnecessary, and that's not taking into consideration that this had very little relevance to the plot in BO6.
Imagine playing through the black ops series, and then in the 6th installment and they add on to the 2nd installment's story for no reason? The writing in BO6 is so bad it's not even funny.
Funny how loosely connected this things are. It somehow feels realistic with how fked up the world are where the enemies surround 1 nation that has their own goals and agenda.
We all thought it was only Raul who did it when really Hudson’s people wanted it to look like it Raul and Hudson’s people wanted him dead,my advice to people who have not played this game is to be careful there playing a game and they don’t even know the rules (dirty players on their side)
So Adler return in BO6 was because Hudson told him that Pantheon is coming?
Adler was the scape goat for putting Woods in wheel chair weeks before the Panama mission Hudson told Adler about pantheon so Adler from the shadows been hunting Pantheon
Hudson was the mole, but now he isn't because(12 years later) BO6 needs to make another character for that story beat. Lmao and I'm betting they will bring back Mason when they need more content in the future.
They always left an opening for mason to come back. The multiple endings in bo2 the truth lies slogan for bo6 using bo2 footage of mason falling after being shot in the leg versus the one where he was shot in the head. I figured he’d be left outta this game but depending on time period for the next black ops I think mason makes a return
@@trilogy3xMason is presumed dead in Black ops 6! As the "The Truth Lies" played the cutscenes where Mason got shot in the leg also there's an explanation of player choose to Shoot Mason on legs it might be considered a mistake on bullet calculation and let's be honest even in Black ops 2 Mason was considered Dead until he showed up in 2025 depending upon the player and endings
@@FR4NKL1NCODMWII an treyarch themself confrimed that woods did kill mason an shoot mason in the head is canon fate for alex mason
@Wolverine1992-z5m The Truth lies mate
@@FR4NKL1NCODMWII alex mason wont be playable opeator bo6 an bo7 next year
David Mason will return
He could have also had something to do with he parents death
Jason hudson didnt die he became triple H and decided to run a wrestling business
he became head of creative
My canon, I want Hudson to live.
(I've already posted this in a later video, but I was planning on posting this comment on this video before the next video popped up. So, ...here it is)
I've never played this game (I'm going cold turkey on Call of Duty and I have no intention of playing CoD ever again due to how scummy Activision is before and after the Microsoft acquisition). After watching campaign videos and seeing how Pantheon was possibly (and most likely) the ones who aided Raul Menendez in kidnapping the young David Mason and forcing Jason Hudson to sell out Alex Mason and Frank Woods to Menendez, I feel the need to throw my hat in the ring regarding their motivations.
Since Pantheon and their branch in the Advanced Technologies and Applications program was shut down by Daniel Livingstone after 1981, they sought revenge against the CIA director. However, since they were officially shut down by the CIA, Pantheon looked to the criminal underworld to finance and continue their plans, such as the crime factions in Avalon (discount Monaco) and Raul Menendez.
Hudson corroborates the testimony from Kravchenko regarding moles in the CIA with the CIA memo Mason found in Menendez's compound in Nicaragua, eventually discovering Pantheon. Pantheon knew that Hudson, as well as Adler, Mason, and Woods by extension, would do everything in their power to stop the organization's plans, so they (or at the very least Hudson and Adler) needed to go.
They get in contact with Raul Menendez, who wanted revenge against Woods, Mason, and Hudson for their roles in Josefina's death, and, seeing that their interests align, has David kidnapped and given to Menendez (as for what happened to Hudson's wife Jenny and their two kids, that's unknown, but we may have to fear the worst)
Following the disaster at Panama, Pantheon frames Adler as the mole, essentially killing two (or four) birds with one stone.
From there, Pantheon focused their efforts in unleashing the Cradle in Washington D.C., which would tarnish Livingstone's reputation and allow Jane Harrow to take control of the CIA and use it as seen fit by the shadow organization.
In short, their deal with Menendez in Panama was a matter of convenience. Giving David to Menendez was just a way to get to Hudson; and leveraging Hudson was just a way to get rid of both him, Mason, Woods, and Adler; and getting rid of all four of the CIA Special Activities Division operatives would allow them to focus their efforts to get who they wanted out of the CIA director's position.
With this whole scenario, Pantheon seem reminiscent to Megiddo from Splinter Cell: Conviction. Much like Megiddo, Pantheon is a shadow organization with international reach. Much like Megiddo in SC: Conviction, Pantheon felt Livingstone, by shutting them down in '81, would leave America vulnerable to threats similar to the ones Dragovich and Perseus posed to the nation. Their plan to unleash the Cradle in the Capitol Building would have not only ruined Livingstone, but it would also act as a way to gain support from the American people regarding what decisions Pantheon made through Harrow - the attack would have been a wake-up call to the American people that, even if the Cold War was over and the Soviet Union was dissolved, there would still be threats and attacks that could happen anywhere to anyone at anytime; that they need to remain vigilant and need a Pantheon-controlled CIA to keep the United States safe. While it may have been a shame to them to waste talented operatives like Mason, Hudson, Woods, and Adler, they most likely saw them as four "self-righteous homicidal maniacs" that they could find anytime they need some. To Pantheon, Livingstone, Hudson, Mason, Woods, and Adler were mere inconveniences to Pantheon - they weren't even people in their eyes.
Why they chose to kill Alex, i never understand
Truth lies
Well he isn't dead
I thought it was cause Raul Menendez took his wife and kids
I'll be honest here I like the word honest bo2 campaign is was a masterpiece the way jason hudson died it was nasty woods mason hudson mission is to capture Raul not his sister to be fair woods kill Raul sister with his grenade one of the most shocking moments in black ops history the bo2 campaign wasn't trash it was something else Raul wanted to get revenge for his sister he would had the chance to kill woods he had him right there as he wanted but he refused to kill woods in that scene watching raul talking to david if I was Raul in bo2 i would of killed woods for killing my sister i don't like it when you have to shoot mason in the head it really sucks though to save him shoot him in the leg is the best options for him to see his son David mason Raul did woods mason hudson dirty in that scene where he all wanted them at his place I understand that woods didn't know that raul sister was in her room but it was his fault that he killed her with his grenade that's what happens if you kill someone family in the game no matter what that villain will always comes for you
What an absolute mind numbing, boring, pointless campaign black ops 6 was.
Had absolute no benefit towards the call of duty saga,
And the fact people still play this games and waste their lives on it,
Is even worse.
When you go back and replay waw or bo1 campaign you realize what a difference it is,
Especially these new open world mission they started doing, where you are a lone wolf aswell, a one man army,
Crap
Well, thank you for spoiling it considering I just started playing the first campaign and the thumbnail of this video so Unsubscribe
apologies
Bro what it's not guy fall I mean you can not to watch the video and not get spoilers so don't blame the guy cuz he make the video I don't want to be rude or mean.
It was hudson who killed janes parents, it was not mason or Adler
How do u know
@@BranWolfYT that why Jane set him up for the hit with Mendez