- Why does Woods hate Hudson? th-cam.com/video/vbII6UYOGM0/w-d-xo.html - Did Hudson betray Mason and Woods? th-cam.com/video/JTvLGM36Qhs/w-d-xo.html Hope you enjoy the videos :)
Despite Woods not liking Hudson, the latter still went out of his way to help rescue him. Guy was shady, but we can’t say he didn’t have some compassion.
Hudson was probably one of the cleanest people in the CIA. Irl most CIA agents are completely devoid of compassion, so they can do really fucked up things with zero hesitation. I've heard many stories of them trying to recruit actual sociopaths or even sadists. Hudson definitely isn't either of those. Yes, he does bad things, but he does them for a good purpose, not just for personal gain. If that was his only motivating factor, he would have given up on Mason in BO1 as quickly as his superiors.
@@bydlakbolszewik847Let’s not forget, he “betrayed” Woods and Mason to protect David who was captured by Menendez. As much as he was shady, he did it to protect the child of the man he just betrayed.
@@bydlakbolszewik847That's just absolutely not true at all lmao. The ideal CIA agent is somebody that's a social butterfly that's able to get along with everybody. The entire objective of the CIA after all is to get other people to trust them and betray their government for the interest of the United States, so an emotionless agent would struggle in this area of trying to gain that kind of trust. Basically, the ideal CIA agent needs to be more of a psychopath or a malevolent person who can display one emotion or feeling while being able to hide their true intentions. Hudson in terms of his personality probably wouldn't be in the CIAs top 5 for being an agent but since he's familiar with being in foreign countries while most likely being able to speak multiple languages, he could still very easily pass to working for them. Also with the kind of stuff that goes on in Call of Duty, no CIA agent is EVER going to get a chance to experience anything that's even remotely close to something such as assassinations, large gunfights, or interrogations.
Woods having a problem with Hudson? So just another day for the two of them. Hudson really just got on Woods' nerves every time the two interacted. And he honestly got on my nerves too, especially during Cold War. Still doesn't make his death at the hands of Menendez any less painful.
@@alvinpainap8102 Hudson in S.O.G. was such a badass. Even with some of the more controversial stuff he did, the stuff with Operation Greenlight in Cold War for example, I still like him a whole like. Him putting on his shades as the Black Ops guitar riff plays will always be some of my favorite moments in all of Call of Duty period. 😎
CW Hudson and BO1/BO2 Hudson seem like completely different characters. A perfect example is in CW when Hudson snarkily tells Woods to "not get any bright ideas". In BO2, even though it's clear they don't like each other, at least Woods doesn't like Hudson, he is a lot more compassionate towards Woods. He goes out of his way to rescue him, even calls him "brother" several times, doesn't push further when Woods doesn't let him interrogate Kravchenko, etc. Maybe CW was just a tough time for him, dealing with the stress of the world possibly going to shit because of his own incompetence (the stolen nuke), that would explain why he's much more unpleasant than any other time we see him. I still think he was misrepresented; BO1 Hudson was a badass, while CW Hudson is like that one overly strict teacher that everyone hated.
@@bydlakbolszewik847 They seem like completely different character's because cold war was written poorly in comparison to bo1's story. Edit: I meant to say cold wars CHARACTERS are poorly written compared to bo1's.
@@neofulcrum5013that always bothered me. When you play as him he's in such a hurry, but from Mason's perspective it looks like he's taking his sweet ass time. Definitely doesn't make sense for someone whose family could be in immediate danger.
Woods is just too straightforward. He doesn't like the way Hudson take care of things. While Hudson is a sort of guy that wants to do things in a secret way to preserve the integrity of people even though some of them are corrupt, he likes to play the CIA game. Woods just doesn't take any thing that seems to be wrong and unreliable. He's a pragmatic man. A very loyal and reliable guy. The one that doesn't let you behind anywhere, a true friend. And he doesn't make the effort to be more calm. He's a hothead. Hudson in my opinion, redeemed himself in black ops 2. That last act lf courage of giving himself up to be tortured and killed in order to save his friends. But Woods is not a saint as well. He lost his shit and killed Josefina.
Even though what Woods did was wrong, it's also completely understandable and you can't really blame him for that. How do you think you would react if you saw the man that slow tortured your friends in front of you, and then threw you into a container with their rotting corpses for several weeks? I'd instead blame whoever approved Woods to take part in that mission. In real life someone with such a short temper as Woods would never get approved for any secret op.
@@bydlakbolszewik847 you're completely right. But I don't justify he loosing his mind. He had to work that. Of course we're talking about a game that has its plot to be done. But just like you mentioned, he shouldn't have been called for that mission to begin with. But Woods also killed Mason (canon). He should have realized that it was all a setup. It was really obvious. Like, he even remembers what Kravchenko told him at Afghanistan, twice. And also, why would you shoot a target without getting his face identified. And Hudson wasn't realiable at the point either. His temper is really broken sometimes.
Mason doesn't Die if you choose not to Kill him in Black Ops 2, unless you only have to figure out and solve the mystery Puzzle pieces about a "Potential Mole" in the C.I.A. Headquarters that are giving Hudson's Suspicious Commanding Orders. Edit: Same goes for Black Ops: Cold War, you also don't have to kill Mason and even Woods etc, if you choose to either stay Loyal to Adler or be Loyal to Perseus (even though you play as a Brain-Washed Bad Guy).
@@fantasyyygarbage Hudson was killed by Menendez in BO2 but that's beside the Point, if Black Ops 3 & 4 were even still Canon, Woods would've already Died Naturally anyway because he's Old as Hell, And no, the Perseus (Evil) Ending in BO: Cold War is obviously Not Canon because it was Confirmed in one of the Cutscenes from Warzone that it Canonically takes place after the Adler (Good) Ending, Not to mention, the "Modern Warfare" Reboot series is in the same Timeline as the Black Ops Universe, so in Essence, Woods is still Alive around the MW Reboot Era as just an Old Man in his Wheelchair.
One nitpick that I have against Black Ops 2 is when Woods says to David that he "should've smoked Hudson in 'Nam". I've always thought it sounded weird because Woods go out and helps save Hudson's life in Vietnam when he got knocked out at the beginning of the mission. The line Woods should've said was "I should've let him die in 'Nam" or "I never should've saved him in 'Nam."
Woods barely knew Hudson in Nam, that and Woods was a marine before BO1, and marines never leave anyone behind, even if they don't like them. He probably wasn't even thinking straight when talking to Section, so he wouldn't even remember that he saved Hudson's life.
Woods thought Hudson was too shady and heartless to be trusted. Hudson thought Woods was too reckless and wouldn’t see things as the big picture. In the end, both men had good intentions, hell, Hudson betrayed both Woods and Mason only to protect David (Mason’s son).
I never understand why he blames Hudson for Mason's death. I mean, what could he do in that situation? His hands are pretty much tied and it's a lose lose situation anyway. Like Kravchenko said, Menendez obviously had his men on CIA and had them kidnap David and Hudson. Shouldn't he blame those traitors? Hell, shouldn't he blame himself for making their dispute this deep by losing his shit during the mission and killing Josephina, the civilian? I do like Woods but when it comes to Hudson, he becomes a total hypocrite.
It's because woods already knew something was off about the situation plus you need to understand usually Hudson knows more information than most other characters
I also think woods should have died instead of Hudson, as Hudson has a wife and kids and wasn’t paralysed, so if he lived he could of had a greater chance at then catching and stopping Menendez. But instead Woods lives and can’t do shit to Menendez because his legs were blown off.
When black ops 6 releases, we all know that Hudson will not get involved due to his sacrifice from Menedez. Or perhaps may get a reference about Hudson and Mason from Woods about them. Since both are unalive. Hope we get to see some more David Mason and Menedez in bo6.
I'm still not accepting Masons death as canon. In my mind, Woods knew something was up, took a shot at the prisoners leg and Mason ended up surviving as a result
This is def a effect of high fov just revealing stuff the player shouldn't see, hudsons actor was prob told to do nothing in that part during Mocap since he wouldn't be in frame
Woods hating Hudson after what happened in Panama really didn't make any sense to me. He clearly knows that Hudson was coerced and Hudson sacrifice his life, despite having two children of his own to save woods and David.
@@AshyBlasianyeah Woods is definitely just projecting his own guilt onto Hudson since he was the easiest one to blame in that situation. People do that a lot irl.
Their beef is what adds charm to the campaign... watching their very differing ideals bounce off each other and clash despite everything is what makes them stand out and seem more human, not just following a script and always getting along hunky dory.
My perspective on Jason Hudson in the "Call of Duty: Black Ops" series paints a nuanced picture of a character often seen through the lens of duty and sacrifice. Indeed, Hudson is portrayed as a complex figure, deeply committed to his country and comrades despite the harsh methods he sometimes employs. Here’s a more detailed breakdown of the points I want to mention: 1. **Interrogating Mason**: Hudson’s decision to interrogate Alex Mason was driven by a desperate need to prevent the catastrophic Nova 6 attacks. This difficult choice underscores his willingness to make personal sacrifices for the greater good, demonstrating his commitment to national security. 2. **Relationship with Mason**: Hudson’s care for Mason is evident despite the tough exterior. He chose to support Mason and sought to help him, reflecting his underlying compassion. His refusal to eliminate Mason, despite Weaver’s concerns, shows his belief in Mason’s potential for recovery and his inherent goodness. 3. **Emails and Concerns**: The concern Hudson shows for Mason in various communications highlights his empathetic side. These details enrich his character, showing that he wasn’t merely a cold operative but someone who valued his comrades’ well-being. 4. **Sacrifice in Black Ops II**: Hudson’s ultimate sacrifice to save Frank Woods and David Mason further cements his status as a hero. This selfless act demonstrates his unwavering loyalty and willingness to put others before himself, a hallmark of his character. 5. **Comparison to Adler**: Unlike Adler in "Black Ops Cold War," who is portrayed as more manipulative and morally ambiguous, Hudson's actions, though sometimes severe, are rooted in a clear sense of duty and honor. In summary, Jason Hudson’s character is multifaceted, embodying the traits of a dedicated and selfless hero who faced incredibly tough decisions. His legacy within the "Call of Duty" series is one of sacrifice, loyalty, and a deep commitment to his country and comrades. This man may have a cold demenour but he is not as manipulative like Adler in call of duty cold war
I love how Woods was pretty much right about Hudson being someone he couldn't trust. Since he was the one feeding Menendez all the info about MAC-V and the Noriega Operation. Hudson might've sacrificed himself for Mason & David, but screw him. He let Woods get his kneecaps blown off and tried to make him kill Mason.
They did a terrible job showcasing why Woods has issues with Hudson. Especially in BO2, apparently, it never occurred to Woods that if he did kill Hudson in N’am, then Mason would have died and Nova-6 would have started WW3.
@@meteidac5913 Hudson literally sacrificed himself to save David. Sure Hudson wasn’t the best but he was a good individual for saving David at the end.
@@erentkss7805It's a lose lose situation for Woods. If he was truthful then Woods and especially Mason would despise him since it lead to David dying.
@@Potato_n_TomatoIt was lose lose for Hudson at the end too. If David got killed by Menendez, then it would've been a 110% chance Woods kills Hudson on sight
Bo1 Hudson was my favorite character in the entire game. Bo2 Alex Mason becomes my favorite. Hudson is still a good character but I think he's better when you know he's deep down a good guy but has to keep his secrets for the cia
Hate how they totally criminalized Hudson in Cold War. Like that’s all he is. A punching bag for the rest of the team. He’s not cool, calculating and sharp as in blops 1/2. And I hate woods acting. Fucking melodrama we do t need it. God Cold War was cringe
Cold War butchered every reoccurring character: Mason doesn't sound like Mason and barley looks his age. Woods is purely just a joke in Cold War despite having serious moments in the BO1 and BO2 campaign (Russian Roulet, getting his knees blown out, and retelling stories to David) Hudson like you mentioned is a punching bag for everyone and is turned into a semi-villian and acted like no one respected him. I think they forgot who the characters were while making the game.
@@MisterDragon_ The biggest issue there is how they made Woods. James C Burns said himself that treyarch didnt even attempt at calling him back for Cold War and instead replaced him with a low badly made impression of him. (Tho its not the new VA's fault but more the voice directors fault.) And his personality is so goofy, nicer than the og Woods who's a hot-headed and impatient kind of guy.
The only reason why Hudson was depicted as a "bad guy" in Cold War was because the entire game is based around exploring the dark deeds of the CIA and Hudson being in the CIA, he's basically guilty by association. The operation greenlight thing wasn't designed by Hudson but since he's CIA, he's gotta share some of that blame with the CIA as an organization. The only real bad thing he did in Cold War was that he didn't tell Woods, Mason, and the rest of the team about the nukes but not because he didn't want to. If you've ever played Cyberpunk 2077s DLC, then may also see some similarities between Reed and Hudson with their loyalty to their respective agencies
I give Cold War credit for 1 reason, it wasn't even meant to be Treyarchs game at first. All because Sledgehammer and Raven couldn't get along, Activision took their scraps and threw it in Treyarchs face and said "You have 1 year, turn this into a Black Ops game so we don't miss a yearly release" And given the circumstances like COVID with most people including the developers working from home, Treyarch did pretty fucking good. Cold War is not on the same level as BO1 or BO2, obviously. But it was sure as hell better than BO3 and BO4, and it was made in such little time during COVID. I still don't forgive them not calling James though. Woods just isn't the same without James lending the voice
@@MisterDragon_okay, the age thing is bullshit because aging in Black Ops makes no sense. Woods is about late 30s in BO1. BO2 he's 50 something and still looks like he's in his late 30s to early '40s. Same with Mason. And by the way, have you ever seen a 90-year-old veteran? They never look as good as Woods here. Not even 0.1% of the population genetics can do that
Title of this vid sounds like something Hudson would pull out his ass to hold against woods for an argument. (Its 2024 but the shit in question happened decades ago 💀)
Oh my god, now I realized, now the “mole” that you hear about in bo6 is a problem. But they are also connecting another thing that has flew above most of our heads is that when you find the CIA memo in Time and Fate mission, the description of the mission then says “potential mole in the CIA”. So now it’s like it’s all coming back to us now, also since that bo6 is happening after bo2 in the past. It is just some pretty cool that I just thought of. What do you think? Pretty cool right!
@@LennyCvijanovic yes yes it's so good and i'm hyped for bo6 because of this ''mole'' story. someone sold hudson and david to menendez. it might be Adler
@@erentkss7805 there is no way the mole is adler cause the supposed mole is also getting adler into trouble adler is working together with woods, marshall and anyone else
I honestly think Woods had every right to hate Hudson. Hudson was a traitor and a double agent. There was clear indicators in both of the games. In Baikinour, Weaver was burned and compromised. Even though Hudson was not shown yet, there was no clear indicator of how he was caught. In the level “Crash Site”, Dragovich and Kravchenko are seen towards the end of the level. The only reason two high ranking officers would show up to that crash site is if they know a HVT would show up and they did know that Mason, Woods, and Bowman were going to be there. In BO2, the biggest indicator was in the Afghanistan level when Kravchenko indicated that Menéndez had people in the CIA. As soon as he said that, Hudson became defensive and claimed that Kravchenko was lying. In the Panama level, Hudson lied to Mason and Woods throughout the whole mission. Towards the end, Hudson tricked Woods into thinking that Nexus target was Menéndez and manipulated him into pulling the trigger on his own friend. You have to admit that Woods was hot-headed and judgmental, but he definitely had a sixth sense about Hudson.
Hudson was practically the secondary protagonist in Bo1 and if wasn’t for him mason would’ve never came back to normal, then he saves woods in bo2, idk why Cold War made him to be some controlling douche
Wow, I hate to say it but I can’t stand the way everyone sounds/looks in that green light mission. Like, to the point idek if I’d be able to get through the story if I tried playing it. Not only do Woods and Mason not even sound a little similar, they look like different people entirely. And woods talking to Hudson after punching him sounds like he’s just reading the script 😭 I feel like such a hater rn but god it’s BOTHERING me
@InDeinTiz All Hudson did during BO2 was to save David, i'm sure mason would have offered his life to save his own son, hudson even choosed to sacrificed himself over killing Woods, the men that hated him since they first meet.
Hudson is kill himself for saving woods and david and mason no matter that Hudson have a family but he dead and woods l think he regret about what he did for hudson
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
- Why does Woods hate Hudson?
th-cam.com/video/vbII6UYOGM0/w-d-xo.html
- Did Hudson betray Mason and Woods?
th-cam.com/video/JTvLGM36Qhs/w-d-xo.html
Hope you enjoy the videos :)
Hudson and Woods are basically your 2 best friends who never get along but love spending time with you, so they put up with each other
Not true, woods hates the CIA along with Hudson.
Friends in school be like…
cia allowance is the shit
I had friend that was really gay and another that was super conservative and religious
They acted a lot like these two
This is so accurate, reminds me of my OG highschool group
Despite Woods not liking Hudson, the latter still went out of his way to help rescue him. Guy was shady, but we can’t say he didn’t have some compassion.
Hudson was probably one of the cleanest people in the CIA. Irl most CIA agents are completely devoid of compassion, so they can do really fucked up things with zero hesitation. I've heard many stories of them trying to recruit actual sociopaths or even sadists. Hudson definitely isn't either of those. Yes, he does bad things, but he does them for a good purpose, not just for personal gain. If that was his only motivating factor, he would have given up on Mason in BO1 as quickly as his superiors.
@@bydlakbolszewik847Let’s not forget, he “betrayed” Woods and Mason to protect David who was captured by Menendez. As much as he was shady, he did it to protect the child of the man he just betrayed.
@@bydlakbolszewik847That's just absolutely not true at all lmao. The ideal CIA agent is somebody that's a social butterfly that's able to get along with everybody. The entire objective of the CIA after all is to get other people to trust them and betray their government for the interest of the United States, so an emotionless agent would struggle in this area of trying to gain that kind of trust.
Basically, the ideal CIA agent needs to be more of a psychopath or a malevolent person who can display one emotion or feeling while being able to hide their true intentions.
Hudson in terms of his personality probably wouldn't be in the CIAs top 5 for being an agent but since he's familiar with being in foreign countries while most likely being able to speak multiple languages, he could still very easily pass to working for them. Also with the kind of stuff that goes on in Call of Duty, no CIA agent is EVER going to get a chance to experience anything that's even remotely close to something such as assassinations, large gunfights, or interrogations.
@@dastemplar9681let’s also not forget him and weaver risked their lives by protecting Mason from the cia
0:22
Hudson: “Jason Hudson, C.I.A.”
Woods: **Looks at Mason, his face is saying: “Who is this clown?”**
No, he hears "CIA" and immediately knows he's a spook that's not to be trusted.
Woods having a problem with Hudson? So just another day for the two of them.
Hudson really just got on Woods' nerves every time the two interacted. And he honestly got on my nerves too, especially during Cold War. Still doesn't make his death at the hands of Menendez any less painful.
No matter what he does, Hudson is still my favorite character, and a badass one too. 0:06 2:24 4:10 😅
@@alvinpainap8102 Hudson in S.O.G. was such a badass. Even with some of the more controversial stuff he did, the stuff with Operation Greenlight in Cold War for example, I still like him a whole like. Him putting on his shades as the Black Ops guitar riff plays will always be some of my favorite moments in all of Call of Duty period. 😎
CW Hudson and BO1/BO2 Hudson seem like completely different characters. A perfect example is in CW when Hudson snarkily tells Woods to "not get any bright ideas". In BO2, even though it's clear they don't like each other, at least Woods doesn't like Hudson, he is a lot more compassionate towards Woods. He goes out of his way to rescue him, even calls him "brother" several times, doesn't push further when Woods doesn't let him interrogate Kravchenko, etc. Maybe CW was just a tough time for him, dealing with the stress of the world possibly going to shit because of his own incompetence (the stolen nuke), that would explain why he's much more unpleasant than any other time we see him. I still think he was misrepresented; BO1 Hudson was a badass, while CW Hudson is like that one overly strict teacher that everyone hated.
Menendez killing woods is the bad ending dude. I bet him presenting David to his dad is Canon.
@@bydlakbolszewik847 They seem like completely different character's because cold war was written poorly in comparison to bo1's story.
Edit: I meant to say cold wars CHARACTERS are poorly written compared to bo1's.
The woods and Hudson problems are better than modern CODs
Wait till you hear that Black ops cold war is a modern cod
@@eternalhatred666ye the graphics sucks and thats the problem thats worse than hudson and woods problems
@@eternalhatred666 good question
@@eternalhatred666 I mean, in BO1 and 2
@@locuzsteaksdude the graphics weren’t that bad and black ops games were always arcade style unlike modern warefare
2:07
YOU CAN SEE MENENDEZ WALKINK TOWARDS THE HORSE BARN THING first time i seen that
I remember realizing that and then wanted to see if as menendez you can see the trio, however I was quite disappointed
Oh damn you’re right! There he is! Casually going for an enthusiastic walk
MENNNAAAANNNDEZZZZZ
@@robertf.atrozskin3596WOODS!
@@neofulcrum5013that always bothered me. When you play as him he's in such a hurry, but from Mason's perspective it looks like he's taking his sweet ass time. Definitely doesn't make sense for someone whose family could be in immediate danger.
Woods is just too straightforward. He doesn't like the way Hudson take care of things.
While Hudson is a sort of guy that wants to do things in a secret way to preserve the integrity of people even though some of them are corrupt, he likes to play the CIA game. Woods just doesn't take any thing that seems to be wrong and unreliable. He's a pragmatic man. A very loyal and reliable guy. The one that doesn't let you behind anywhere, a true friend. And he doesn't make the effort to be more calm. He's a hothead.
Hudson in my opinion, redeemed himself in black ops 2. That last act lf courage of giving himself up to be tortured and killed in order to save his friends.
But Woods is not a saint as well. He lost his shit and killed Josefina.
Even though what Woods did was wrong, it's also completely understandable and you can't really blame him for that. How do you think you would react if you saw the man that slow tortured your friends in front of you, and then threw you into a container with their rotting corpses for several weeks? I'd instead blame whoever approved Woods to take part in that mission. In real life someone with such a short temper as Woods would never get approved for any secret op.
@@bydlakbolszewik847 you're completely right. But I don't justify he loosing his mind. He had to work that. Of course we're talking about a game that has its plot to be done. But just like you mentioned, he shouldn't have been called for that mission to begin with.
But Woods also killed Mason (canon). He should have realized that it was all a setup. It was really obvious. Like, he even remembers what Kravchenko told him at Afghanistan, twice. And also, why would you shoot a target without getting his face identified. And Hudson wasn't realiable at the point either. His temper is really broken sometimes.
We're in Panama, to capture Noriega! Hey! Noriega! Hey! But we ain't keepin' him, we're givin' him up in a trade-off!
@@pedrorezende6444he didn’t know she was in there
Guess I'm like Frank Woods then
RIP Hudson, Mason, and Soap
Press F to pay respects for them
F
Mason doesn't Die if you choose not to Kill him in Black Ops 2, unless you only have to figure out and solve the mystery Puzzle pieces about a "Potential Mole" in the C.I.A. Headquarters that are giving Hudson's Suspicious Commanding Orders.
Edit: Same goes for Black Ops: Cold War, you also don't have to kill Mason and even Woods etc, if you choose to either stay Loyal to Adler or be Loyal to Perseus (even though you play as a Brain-Washed Bad Guy).
@@joseurbina3835it was confirmed by Treyarch that woods and Hudson (obviously) are dead.
@@fantasyyygarbage Hudson was killed by Menendez in BO2 but that's beside the Point, if Black Ops 3 & 4 were even still Canon, Woods would've already Died Naturally anyway because he's Old as Hell,
And no, the Perseus (Evil) Ending in BO: Cold War is obviously Not Canon because it was Confirmed in one of the Cutscenes from Warzone that it Canonically takes place after the Adler (Good) Ending,
Not to mention, the "Modern Warfare" Reboot series is in the same Timeline as the Black Ops Universe, so in Essence, Woods is still Alive around the MW Reboot Era as just an Old Man in his Wheelchair.
I'll just pay my respects for Soap and mason, L Hudson
One nitpick that I have against Black Ops 2 is when Woods says to David that he "should've smoked Hudson in 'Nam". I've always thought it sounded weird because Woods go out and helps save Hudson's life in Vietnam when he got knocked out at the beginning of the mission. The line Woods should've said was "I should've let him die in 'Nam" or "I never should've saved him in 'Nam."
Woods barely knew Hudson in Nam, that and Woods was a marine before BO1, and marines never leave anyone behind, even if they don't like them. He probably wasn't even thinking straight when talking to Section, so he wouldn't even remember that he saved Hudson's life.
Woods was too mad to think straight, and mostly mad at himself.
He was retelling the worst time of his life and got emotional and regretful at how things turned out
Woods thought Hudson was too shady and heartless to be trusted.
Hudson thought Woods was too reckless and wouldn’t see things as the big picture.
In the end, both men had good intentions, hell, Hudson betrayed both Woods and Mason only to protect David (Mason’s son).
And his own family too.
@@Mr.SkibidiSigmafrom what I heard Hudson wasn't even married
My vision of Hudson changed over time. And changed when he calls Woods “brother”.
Black Ops 1 Hudson: Friends
Black Ops 2 Hudson: FriENDS
Black Ops Cold War Hudson: Average CIA ''bad guy''
BO6: straight up bad guy
Hudson: I was never in Panama
@Mairani-Indo if he wasn’t, my bad.
@@danhguitardemosHudson is dead at that time, and so is Mason, so it's all Woods now
@@MadChristophnot unless you shoot Mason in the leg.
I never understand why he blames Hudson for Mason's death. I mean, what could he do in that situation? His hands are pretty much tied and it's a lose lose situation anyway. Like Kravchenko said, Menendez obviously had his men on CIA and had them kidnap David and Hudson. Shouldn't he blame those traitors? Hell, shouldn't he blame himself for making their dispute this deep by losing his shit during the mission and killing Josephina, the civilian? I do like Woods but when it comes to Hudson, he becomes a total hypocrite.
He blames himself. Hudson just ends up taking the flak
It's because woods already knew something was off about the situation plus you need to understand usually Hudson knows more information than most other characters
@TTFEJ He quite literally admitted that Josefina’s death was an accident as well
I also think woods should have died instead of Hudson, as Hudson has a wife and kids and wasn’t paralysed, so if he lived he could of had a greater chance at then catching and stopping Menendez. But instead Woods lives and can’t do shit to Menendez because his legs were blown off.
@@bacon_0472 Hudson would have probably died anyway
2:12 I love how Menendez is a trigger phrase for Woods. Dude just charged in
totally forgot Hudson went from looking/sounding like Ed Harris to Michael Keaton😂
When black ops 6 releases, we all know that Hudson will not get involved due to his sacrifice from Menedez. Or perhaps may get a reference about Hudson and Mason from Woods about them. Since both are unalive. Hope we get to see some more David Mason and Menedez in bo6.
Maybe we could see another flashback with them. Something that seemed insignificant at the time, but is relevant to BO6.
I'm still not accepting Masons death as canon. In my mind, Woods knew something was up, took a shot at the prisoners leg and Mason ended up surviving as a result
@@isaakknighthd5888 only treyarch knows for sure
@@isaakknighthd5888considering that the BO6 slogan is "the truth lies" i think it would play some part to mason's "death"
@@isaakknighthd5888mason lives and menendez lives(shown in bo3) karma/chloe also survives
Hudson a snake at 1:51
This is def a effect of high fov just revealing stuff the player shouldn't see, hudsons actor was prob told to do nothing in that part during Mocap since he wouldn't be in frame
@@barcelo2304 Ya thats most likely the reason as we see him tied up and left for dead with the others later in the mission.
2:22 why is this so satisfying? Hudson calling Frank back to him at just the right volume and an explosion PERFECTLY timed afterwards. Beautiful.
Woods hating Hudson after what happened in Panama really didn't make any sense to me. He clearly knows that Hudson was coerced and Hudson sacrifice his life, despite having two children of his own to save woods and David.
Woods literally has big problem with Hudson even though Hudson sacrifices himself
Cuz he mad at himself that he never really messed with Hudson and when he finally sacrificed himself woods feels bad
Hudson was a mole he had it coming
@@Infamouschef_yeah against his will. To protect david
@@AshyBlasianyeah Woods is definitely just projecting his own guilt onto Hudson since he was the easiest one to blame in that situation. People do that a lot irl.
@@Infamouschef_ he was not the mole. The mole will be a forever mystery.
Hudson: Jason Hudson CIA…..Thank you for your time Sergeant.
*Looks at mason like another goddamn cake eater?*
Woods: ….Right….
Hudson is literally the mole, and we will see for ourselves in BO6
Nah thats crazy i never noticed hudson not being attacked in the cave that changes so many things
0:26 - I guess you can tell Woods has no time for cloak and dagger/red tape BS
TFT music at the end *chef's kiss*
5:43 woods really getting treated like a guard dog here
Their beef is what adds charm to the campaign... watching their very differing ideals bounce off each other and clash despite everything is what makes them stand out and seem more human, not just following a script and always getting along hunky dory.
Forgot how bad bo2 Hudson sounded
Fr
It isn't as bad as cold war
Bo1 hudson sounded so badass idk why they didnt just keep that voice actor
@@krustyman5151 fr. But rip Ed Harris
@@bokc_ellisEd Harris is still alive. You probably mistaken for Ed Asner, who did passed away in 2021
Woods repents saving Hudson in 'Nam. Maybe he thought he was the mole in the CIA
I had 2 friends they were like both of these 2 but they never like each other but I had a good understanding with them
Hudson’s voice in BO2 is so bad I’m almost cringing hearing it
It's Michael Keaton bro
My perspective on Jason Hudson in the "Call of Duty: Black Ops" series paints a nuanced picture of a character often seen through the lens of duty and sacrifice. Indeed, Hudson is portrayed as a complex figure, deeply committed to his country and comrades despite the harsh methods he sometimes employs. Here’s a more detailed breakdown of the points I want to mention:
1. **Interrogating Mason**: Hudson’s decision to interrogate Alex Mason was driven by a desperate need to prevent the catastrophic Nova 6 attacks. This difficult choice underscores his willingness to make personal sacrifices for the greater good, demonstrating his commitment to national security.
2. **Relationship with Mason**: Hudson’s care for Mason is evident despite the tough exterior. He chose to support Mason and sought to help him, reflecting his underlying compassion. His refusal to eliminate Mason, despite Weaver’s concerns, shows his belief in Mason’s potential for recovery and his inherent goodness.
3. **Emails and Concerns**: The concern Hudson shows for Mason in various communications highlights his empathetic side. These details enrich his character, showing that he wasn’t merely a cold operative but someone who valued his comrades’ well-being.
4. **Sacrifice in Black Ops II**: Hudson’s ultimate sacrifice to save Frank Woods and David Mason further cements his status as a hero. This selfless act demonstrates his unwavering loyalty and willingness to put others before himself, a hallmark of his character.
5. **Comparison to Adler**: Unlike Adler in "Black Ops Cold War," who is portrayed as more manipulative and morally ambiguous, Hudson's actions, though sometimes severe, are rooted in a clear sense of duty and honor.
In summary, Jason Hudson’s character is multifaceted, embodying the traits of a dedicated and selfless hero who faced incredibly tough decisions. His legacy within the "Call of Duty" series is one of sacrifice, loyalty, and a deep commitment to his country and comrades. This man may have a cold demenour but he is not as manipulative like Adler in call of duty cold war
Bot
Chat GPT lol
@@ELIZABETHMARLONE2005what is that?
@@CommanderRex-what do you mean?
might be able to fool an idiot but that's ai generated
The new voice actors are so much worse than the OG voices
But you gotta admit that CW Hudson sounds better than Michael Keaton
The moment Woods glances at Mason we should have known.
If Woods reached the house 1 minute later the entirety of black ops 2 wouldn't have happened
Hudson was CIA and Woods was MACV SOG (Specials Operations Task Group)
I love how Woods was pretty much right about Hudson being someone he couldn't trust. Since he was the one feeding Menendez all the info about MAC-V and the Noriega Operation. Hudson might've sacrificed himself for Mason & David, but screw him. He let Woods get his kneecaps blown off and tried to make him kill Mason.
They did a terrible job showcasing why Woods has issues with Hudson.
Especially in BO2, apparently, it never occurred to Woods that if he did kill Hudson in N’am, then Mason would have died and Nova-6 would have started WW3.
I always loved this duo
I really hated how Woods treated Hudson
He has a point about Hudson and i understand him
hudson was a dishonest person
@@meteidac5913 Hudson literally sacrificed himself to save David. Sure Hudson wasn’t the best but he was a good individual for saving David at the end.
@@erentkss7805It's a lose lose situation for Woods.
If he was truthful then Woods and especially Mason would despise him since it lead to David dying.
@@Potato_n_TomatoIt was lose lose for Hudson at the end too. If David got killed by Menendez, then it would've been a 110% chance Woods kills Hudson on sight
One thing is for sure, absolutely NO ONE messes with Woods when he's angry
Hudson be like “don’t kill the terrorist even though that’s the mission” I didn’t feel bad when he died he killed them
Next time,I might not stop woods
-Adler
0:51 the noise used in all rap songs
Y'all still like hudson?
Bo1 Hudson was my favorite character in the entire game. Bo2 Alex Mason becomes my favorite. Hudson is still a good character but I think he's better when you know he's deep down a good guy but has to keep his secrets for the cia
Both similar like Michael & Trevor.
After blackops 6 we need a treyarch game set in the Korean War or the 1950s as like a prequel to blackops 1
Hate how they totally criminalized Hudson in Cold War. Like that’s all he is. A punching bag for the rest of the team. He’s not cool, calculating and sharp as in blops 1/2. And I hate woods acting. Fucking melodrama we do t need it. God Cold War was cringe
Cold War butchered every reoccurring character:
Mason doesn't sound like Mason and barley looks his age.
Woods is purely just a joke in Cold War despite having serious moments in the BO1 and BO2 campaign (Russian Roulet, getting his knees blown out, and retelling stories to David)
Hudson like you mentioned is a punching bag for everyone and is turned into a semi-villian and acted like no one respected him.
I think they forgot who the characters were while making the game.
@@MisterDragon_ The biggest issue there is how they made Woods. James C Burns said himself that treyarch didnt even attempt at calling him back for Cold War and instead replaced him with a low badly made impression of him. (Tho its not the new VA's fault but more the voice directors fault.) And his personality is so goofy, nicer than the og Woods who's a hot-headed and impatient kind of guy.
The only reason why Hudson was depicted as a "bad guy" in Cold War was because the entire game is based around exploring the dark deeds of the CIA and Hudson being in the CIA, he's basically guilty by association. The operation greenlight thing wasn't designed by Hudson but since he's CIA, he's gotta share some of that blame with the CIA as an organization. The only real bad thing he did in Cold War was that he didn't tell Woods, Mason, and the rest of the team about the nukes but not because he didn't want to. If you've ever played Cyberpunk 2077s DLC, then may also see some similarities between Reed and Hudson with their loyalty to their respective agencies
I give Cold War credit for 1 reason, it wasn't even meant to be Treyarchs game at first. All because Sledgehammer and Raven couldn't get along, Activision took their scraps and threw it in Treyarchs face and said "You have 1 year, turn this into a Black Ops game so we don't miss a yearly release"
And given the circumstances like COVID with most people including the developers working from home, Treyarch did pretty fucking good. Cold War is not on the same level as BO1 or BO2, obviously. But it was sure as hell better than BO3 and BO4, and it was made in such little time during COVID.
I still don't forgive them not calling James though. Woods just isn't the same without James lending the voice
@@MisterDragon_okay, the age thing is bullshit because aging in Black Ops makes no sense. Woods is about late 30s in BO1. BO2 he's 50 something and still looks like he's in his late 30s to early '40s. Same with Mason. And by the way, have you ever seen a 90-year-old veteran? They never look as good as Woods here. Not even 0.1% of the population genetics can do that
In alt universe they are best buddies
Wood/Hudson relationship is pretty much identical to price/Kamarov in the mw series. Just with a hint of ill will
I bet he wanted to help the bastard because he wants his family out of this war
Hudson is voiced by Ed Harris in BO1 but in BO2 he's voiced by Michael Keaton. Does anyone know why did they replace Harris with Keaton?
No one knows for sure. He was probably busy
“I just hate everybody” woods black ops 2
I bet he did betrayed them for getting his family out of the war
Title of this vid sounds like something Hudson would pull out his ass to hold against woods for an argument. (Its 2024 but the shit in question happened decades ago 💀)
It’s probably easier to count the times they didn’t have problems
I never liked Hudson. But in the end, he did something selfless
How I would like young Raul Menendez to appear in this Call of Duty:(
S.O.G 0:08
in other words Woods hates Hudson for doing his job.
Can you make a video about secret things and differences of the MW and BO games on the Nintendo Wii?
Wow the men who got blown up by frags
woods has some points hudson wasn't a trustworthy man but he wasn't the mole in the cia
Oh my god, now I realized, now the “mole” that you hear about in bo6 is a problem. But they are also connecting another thing that has flew above most of our heads is that when you find the CIA memo in Time and Fate mission, the description of the mission then says “potential mole in the CIA”. So now it’s like it’s all coming back to us now, also since that bo6 is happening after bo2 in the past. It is just some pretty cool that I just thought of. What do you think? Pretty cool right!
@@LennyCvijanovicyeah, i think bo6's plot is definitely going to be about finding out the cia mole that got the bo1 crew killed
@@LennyCvijanovic yes yes it's so good and i'm hyped for bo6 because of this ''mole'' story. someone sold hudson and david to menendez. it might be Adler
@@erentkss7805 there is no way the mole is adler cause the supposed mole is also getting adler into trouble
adler is working together with woods, marshall and anyone else
@@ola_ola._. i said like that because Adler will be the villain in BO6
I'm still disappointed that they changed the original voice actors in cold war. It's just never the same.
Loved the Italian Dub 👍👍
black ops and battlefield 3 had the best ps3 graphics
Frank Woods never did liked Jason Hudson Because he's an ice cube like Alex Mason always said he was 💯🎯
Wood should've never rescued Hudson in nam
Guess ever since hudson lied to him in cold war he no trust him
Mcknight is the one who betrayed them, not hudson, they had hudsons family
Provide proof
Woods never like hudson
I honestly think Woods had every right to hate Hudson. Hudson was a traitor and a double agent. There was clear indicators in both of the games. In Baikinour, Weaver was burned and compromised. Even though Hudson was not shown yet, there was no clear indicator of how he was caught. In the level “Crash Site”, Dragovich and Kravchenko are seen towards the end of the level. The only reason two high ranking officers would show up to that crash site is if they know a HVT would show up and they did know that Mason, Woods, and Bowman were going to be there. In BO2, the biggest indicator was in the Afghanistan level when Kravchenko indicated that Menéndez had people in the CIA. As soon as he said that, Hudson became defensive and claimed that Kravchenko was lying. In the Panama level, Hudson lied to Mason and Woods throughout the whole mission. Towards the end, Hudson tricked Woods into thinking that Nexus target was Menéndez and manipulated him into pulling the trigger on his own friend. You have to admit that Woods was hot-headed and judgmental, but he definitely had a sixth sense about Hudson.
Hudson was the mole
3 days ago 😢
4:00
What if hudson get revenge to menedez without being killed?
Hudson was reznov
Listening to the cold war clips.
Those voice actors are garbage, at least in terms of the characters they're meant to play.
He’s too old for having problems
The title cut of at “had” and they were awfully close in thumbnail
Hudson was practically the secondary protagonist in Bo1 and if wasn’t for him mason would’ve never came back to normal, then he saves woods in bo2, idk why Cold War made him to be some controlling douche
Now u gonna have problems
Wow, I hate to say it but I can’t stand the way everyone sounds/looks in that green light mission. Like, to the point idek if I’d be able to get through the story if I tried playing it. Not only do Woods and Mason not even sound a little similar, they look like different people entirely. And woods talking to Hudson after punching him sounds like he’s just reading the script 😭 I feel like such a hater rn but god it’s BOTHERING me
2:16
I played Black ops and Black ops 2 and Cold War and why does Woods have a problem with Hudson?
Woods doesn't like Hudson's dishonesty
Well Hudson was the reason why Mason died in BO2 and in Cold War Hudson was trying to save his ass and let everyone get screwed over
@InDeinTiz All Hudson did during BO2 was to save David, i'm sure mason would have offered his life to save his own son, hudson even choosed to sacrificed himself over killing Woods, the men that hated him since they first meet.
@@patogrone9353 it wouldn’t even came that far if Hudson didn’t swap Mason with menendez
Mason !!!
Woods should’ve smoked Hudson back in nam
What’s wrong with CIA??
Everything 🤣
Everything 🥴
“every”thing😅😂?
@@strayednine8859 ok
Go ahead and look up the mk ultra experiment. That, and so much more, is what's wrong with the CIA.
Hudson is the traitor
video ended at 3:20
so is hudson good or bad?
@@cam4001 good
He's not bad but he does messed up things for the sake of good
Woods had to be the school bully💀💀
What was the deal between Hudson and Woods?
Woods just didn't like how Hudson handled operations; he was always doing things in secret, not telling the other 2.
@@Yuhyeauhuhsurebuddy1 Okay, fair enough.
Hudson = Gen. Shepherd
≠
Bet you never played a single cod campaign and you just watch it on TH-cam
Hudson is kill himself for saving woods and david and mason no matter that Hudson have a family but he dead and woods l think he regret about what he did for hudson
I’m like 666 heh heh 😈 😈😈😈😈
I cringe at the newer cods bro woods and mason sound awful they kinda look different 2
@@Soysebastiano Mason looks too young and Woods' beard is too thick
Is anyone here looking to buy a copy of Black ops 1 forthe ps3?
I got mine back in 2012
@@airtiger4577 same but I found my dad's copy so I'ma sell mine
@TerryR-e3v My copy apparently also happens to be my dad's copy
They should just kiss, the on and off is getting annoying