Rheinmetall Lynx KF41 Infantry Fighting Vehicle Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ต.ค. 2024
  • Hello everyone, welcome back to Military TV. In today’s episode we will take a look at Rheinmetall Lynx KF41, the infantry fighting vehicle. If you want to get further details regarding this tank, stay with us and watch this video till the end! . The Lynx is a German armoured fighting vehicle developed by Rheinmetall Land system that is a part of Rheinmetall's Vehicle Systems division. According to Rheinmetall, the Lynx family of tracked armoured vehicles is at the forefront of a new trend in Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV), designed toward armoured vehicles with lower unit and through-life costs and reduced complexity. One of the key principles of the Lynx concept is the integration of proven sub-systems with a high technology readiness level to reduce development time, cost, and technical risk. The Lynx platform provides maximum freedom of action. It ensures exceptional mobility, collect, analyses and disseminates data, also offers windows of opportunity for responding to flexible and effective battlefield threats.
    Other videos you might like:
    PUMA IFV ► • PUMA IFV - The Most Ad...
    AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle ► • The U.S. Marines AAV7 ...
    The M2 Bradley armored vehicle ► • Send To Ukraine: How P...
    Lynx KF41 Infantry Fighting Vehicle ► • Rheinmetall Lynx KF41 ...
    How assault vehicles destroy IEDs without locating them? ► • M1150 Assault Breacher...
    25 Military Vehicles at Work in the U.S. Armed Forces ► • 25 Military Vehicles a...
    Most Powerful Tanks In Use Today ► • These Are The 10 Most ...
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
    / militarytv.channel
    defense-tv.com/

ความคิดเห็น • 120

  • @drbendover7467
    @drbendover7467 2 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    Gotta hand it to those Germans, they really do have a great history of building really awesome tanks:)

    • @justanaveragenormalgamer1632
      @justanaveragenormalgamer1632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah they always create state of the art military equipment

    • @HorseshitDetectionAgency
      @HorseshitDetectionAgency 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justanaveragenormalgamer1632 why is it always weeb gamer spergs who worship Germans so much?

    • @Ace4face
      @Ace4face ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Dankeschön 😊

    • @kdw1809
      @kdw1809 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's not a tank! You mean tracked vehicle in general! Germans are crazy good

    • @johnwood5912
      @johnwood5912 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome home to all the veterans here. To the cavalry vets, see you in Fiddlers Green. Agent Orange -- Sprayed and Betrayed !
      And I thought we were bad-asses in Nam on the DMZ on our M-113 ACAV (Armored Cavalry Assault Vehicle) in 3rd Squadron, 5th Armored Cavalry Regiment, Division Recon, 1st Cavalry Div., 101 Airborne Div., 9th Infantry Div., 5th Infantry Div. We had a 50 cal for the track commander and two M-60, 7.62 machine guns on each side. I rode one of the M-60s when rolling, dismounted at night and dug a neck deep hole for our NDP (Night Defensive Position) until I heard "Scouts out!' and humped the bush stepping over trip wires, wait-a-minute vines and looking for NVA tunnels,
      Look at the new OMFV (Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle) by Reinmettal to replace most everything armored for cavalry and infantry by 2027. This is why yesterday DoD announced we are giving dozens of those soon to be obsolete Bradleys to the Ukrainian Army.
      I like the "Optionally Manned" part. It can be operated remotely! In Nam, I could have sat in the rear at Dong Ha smoking and joking instead of being shot at by the NVA on the DMZ, Khe Sanh, the A Shau Valley, Con Thien, the Ho Chi Minh trail and other interesting shit holes where I forgot to collect postcards to send back The World.
      Hope you liked my fun facts.
      If you ain't cav....

  • @madhie-kun8614
    @madhie-kun8614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    KF51 Panther and KF41 Lynx are too futuristic that feels like so unreal, like those tanks exist in 2140 but without railguns

    • @Kackbratze99
      @Kackbratze99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you mean a twin railgun :D

    • @AcidGambit419
      @AcidGambit419 ปีที่แล้ว

      That could easily be remedied.

  • @ilaccci8032
    @ilaccci8032 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Hungary raised the number to 256 (ambulance,recovery,command vehicle)

    • @wolflarsen1900
      @wolflarsen1900 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      hungary shouldnt get one single one of them. hungary only deserves to get sued by the eu komission. First get your democracy straight than try to protect it.. We sell them to you because that helps our industry and because the lynx need to be proven effective to sell them all around nato, but we will spit on every single one of them before we sent them to hungary.

    • @vorosjanos77
      @vorosjanos77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ...and don't forget that he also ordered a special KF41-AA version with oerlikon skynex

    • @Nanovich100
      @Nanovich100 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wolflarsen1900 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 Congrat yf clown!👏👏

  • @SurvivethePoleShift
    @SurvivethePoleShift 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Question:...Will Rheinmetall allow an Ammunition Factory to be built in Australia?
    Australians have invested heavily in Rhienmetalls IFV's and if the Lynx is to be built in Australia
    how about the ammo for it being a Sovereign component too.
    P.S. I can't wait to see Rhienmetall's Tiger when they produce one.

    • @makegaminggreatagain3907
      @makegaminggreatagain3907 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It'll probably be built in China.

    • @DJ1573
      @DJ1573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Panther is already here they wont go heavier except they make a C&C like 2- barreled Tiger

    • @wolflarsen1900
      @wolflarsen1900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DJ1573 i wanted to say the same.. i am sad now. maybe we can call the next main battle tank tiger 2. But its not easy because we allready have something else with the name tiger

    • @NotUnymous
      @NotUnymous ปีที่แล้ว

      It's up to the German government to allow Rheinmetall what and where to sell. I doubt tho that they want foreign ammunition compability, they produced their own top-tier ammunition and certainly want to sell it ;-)

    • @johnathonwood5523
      @johnathonwood5523 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wolflarsen1900 call it tiger 3 and give it a rotating 3 barrel 155mm main cannon.
      Done. War over

  • @khanhonam7196
    @khanhonam7196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Please review KF 51 panther

    • @Military-TV
      @Military-TV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Under way

    • @aleksandrprodeus9383
      @aleksandrprodeus9383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Military-TV 👍

    • @jaysonmatanguihan3311
      @jaysonmatanguihan3311 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Military-TV nice

    • @wolflarsen1900
      @wolflarsen1900 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GUNTHER1 yeah and it has an even disproportional bigger propelling charge with 50% more reach and penetrating power because it now is even autoloaded and bigger ammunition can be used. Such big shells couldnt be moved by hand, so its not just the bigger calibre its also totally more effective ammuntion besides that

  • @xavierprotocols
    @xavierprotocols 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Boxer seems more capable with more mission variants and only takes 30 minutes to swap out vs 8 hours. They also just announced a new tracked Boxer variant if the 8x8 wheeled variant isn't preferred.

  • @Deadhessian
    @Deadhessian ปีที่แล้ว

    if i had to decide for them pods and stuff id take natter on top of turret, 2xspike pod on one side and 120hero-loitering-ammuniton on the other side, perfect thing. probably breaking many budget-lines.

  • @andrewcarlson3486
    @andrewcarlson3486 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Almost looks like Poland's invisible tank

  • @otaconz1147
    @otaconz1147 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The US Army was looking into it or?

  • @yozora-217
    @yozora-217 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    素晴らしい技術だ

  • @spaceman5055
    @spaceman5055 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I want one

    • @aleksandrprodeus9383
      @aleksandrprodeus9383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +9,2 million $

    • @spaceman5055
      @spaceman5055 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@aleksandrprodeus9383 @ElonMusk can have a small 10 million dollar loan?
      ......please lol

  • @petermeyerhoff8737
    @petermeyerhoff8737 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And just who are 'Rain Metal'??

  • @Ishikawa745
    @Ishikawa745 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    For some reason it looks similar design to the Sabrah Light Tank

    • @heinzkabofke6791
      @heinzkabofke6791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ....but it works. And is based on the Puma.

    • @ps9898
      @ps9898 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not even close 😂

  • @TheKadaitchaMan
    @TheKadaitchaMan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wotan (the cannon) not “whatan” …pronounce the o as “oh” “wohtan” as in Woden or Odin, Wotan, the primary God in Germanic mythology. Not to be pedantic but that’s a hell of a statement when you give the name to an auto cannon.

  • @blitzkriegsebastian
    @blitzkriegsebastian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It is very good but bloody expensive.

  • @Waywind420
    @Waywind420 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Kf51 Tank✅
    Lynx IFV ✅
    Boxer AFV ✅
    &
    Thales Hawkei ✅
    Australia should pull their thumb out and just buy german.

    • @fgtrhwu2
      @fgtrhwu2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Korean victory

    • @Waywind420
      @Waywind420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@fgtrhwu2 The redback seems to be a fine vehicle too, although it reportedly performed poorly during Polish trials.
      I worry the 30mm gun on Redback is limiting and I worry that having a Korean IFV, German AFV, American MBT and an Australian JLTV is just a bit jumbled in regards to parts compatibility, maintenance consistency and expertise.
      To me it makes sense to buy as much from the same company or same country (or better yet from your own country).
      K2 Panther, K808 are both Hyundai vehicles but the Redback in Hanwha.
      The KF51, Lynx, Boxer are all Rheinmetall vehicles and that makes things consistent.

    • @fgtrhwu2
      @fgtrhwu2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Waywind420 Didn't it outperform the Lynx during the trials in Australia? The military preferred it over the Lynx too. Plus it's being produced in Australia as well. All in all a good deal I think

    • @Waywind420
      @Waywind420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fgtrhwu2 I think both vehicles were closely considered given how long the trials went on for.
      Australian military also cut the order size down significantly so perhaps Rheinmetall was less keen to work with our government after we did that.
      Redback seemed to be a cost-effective, high quality vehicle which also offered some diplomatic benefits to Australian-korean relations.
      The 35mm canon on the lynx probably has more bite to it, along with programmable ammunition rounds.
      The 30mm canon on the redback is a proven calibre, can store more ammo on missions (marginally) and it's an easy ammunition calibre to source.
      The Americans are slapping 50mm canons on their next gen IFV's

    • @Waywind420
      @Waywind420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fgtrhwu2 I should point out that I don't know what i'm talking about and that i'm just brainstorming what I think I know.

  • @lordkorner
    @lordkorner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Rheinmetall , having problems with pronunciating? , just say Ryan Metaal, and your close. Rain metal just doesn't cut the mustard.

  • @Rainbirdman1
    @Rainbirdman1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Any for Ukraine, I wonder?

  • @gouravmisra2317
    @gouravmisra2317 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    JAY HIND 🔥🔥 JAY BHARAT 🔥🔥

  • @truecerium4924
    @truecerium4924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    in short where are the differences between the Puma and the Lynx? The armament pods, but what else?

    • @Freedom9X
      @Freedom9X 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Puma is way more expensive and has an unmanned turret.

    • @truecerium4924
      @truecerium4924 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Freedom9X didn´t know that, I just thought there would be the same stations as in the Marder; many thanks :)

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Puma was build to German Army requirements, which were quite high and stiff, so it resulted in a very capable but also very expensive IFV tailored to German requirements. Lynx is a more flexible, more end-user customizable and affordable option for the export market.

    • @truecerium4924
      @truecerium4924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jonny2954 Hi Jonny! Many thanks for the clarification. For nostalgic reasons (former Panzergrenadier) I still love the Marder ;)

    • @danielowits2727
      @danielowits2727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@truecerium4924 The Marder can only shoot stationary while the Puma/Lynx can shoot while moving, also both the Puma and Lynx are designed for live communication and planning during a mission while the Marder requires a briefing before the mission, since it is less integrated.

  • @robertpopradi5020
    @robertpopradi5020 ปีที่แล้ว

    Van még mit fejleszteni a védelmi képességeken ...
    De talán ami késik , az nem múlik .. csak pénzbe kerül ..
    De mennyibe "kerül" az emberélet .???

  • @AAa-cf1oe
    @AAa-cf1oe ปีที่แล้ว

    💙

  • @tatradak9781
    @tatradak9781 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why drive with the fricking hatch open.. Surely now the driver has all round panaramic vision with screens.. No rubber tracks,

  • @tkskagen
    @tkskagen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    With the onboard Crew, Turret and up to 6 passengers, where is the Engine and Transmission placed?...
    I'm used to the Rear Engine placement.
    Just old like that!

    • @MaticTheProto
      @MaticTheProto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No ifv nowadays has a rear engine except for some soviet remnants. The engine is at the front, to also serve as extra armor

  • @AtroposLeshesis
    @AtroposLeshesis ปีที่แล้ว

    50 tons??? What is this?? The German Bradley from the pentagon wars???

  • @umu8934
    @umu8934 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's better Rheinmetall kf41 vs BAE system Hagglunds CV90 mk4?

    • @PpAirO5
      @PpAirO5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Good question. Even though the Lynx is a new and modern design, the CV90 is well tested and keeps on evolving. The CV90 would propably be significantly cheaper than the Lynx.

    • @MaticTheProto
      @MaticTheProto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      In terms if modern technology and useful features the lynx is probably better

    • @MaticTheProto
      @MaticTheProto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In terms if modern technology and useful features the lynx is probably better

    • @LoisoPondohva
      @LoisoPondohva 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MaticTheProto not really, CV90 went through a full modernization program and the new models are just as computerised as the lynx.

    • @hatchet646
      @hatchet646 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PpAirO5 The Czech ifv programme with 210 CV90s costs ~1.4-1.5 times of the hungarian 256 kf41 ifv programme.

  • @tmackenzie1
    @tmackenzie1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MUCH MUCH BETTER THAN THE BRITISH AJAX

  • @jhiroclemente5188
    @jhiroclemente5188 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like a sheridan but modernized

  • @Tigerdriver91Academy
    @Tigerdriver91Academy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks very tanky

  • @UnionSocialistSovietRepublics
    @UnionSocialistSovietRepublics ปีที่แล้ว

    Basicaly a PUMA on futuristic steroids

  • @МухаммадМухаммад-з6й
    @МухаммадМухаммад-з6й 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haky den bolmasa da gunasi dendir

  • @coppertopv365
    @coppertopv365 หลายเดือนก่อน

    give me a Bradley instead.

  • @bugstomper4670
    @bugstomper4670 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mr Lightsaber is narrating it? Did you not sell enough of those 💩 flashlights?

  • @МухаммадМухаммад-з6й
    @МухаммадМухаммад-з6й 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Araplar nahili dubai biz nahili adalat hudaýda bamy ol

  • @МухаммадМухаммад-з6й
    @МухаммадМухаммад-з6й 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Den bolmasan den jogap berersin

  • @pitb8690
    @pitb8690 ปีที่แล้ว

    Concept pl 01

  • @jericotimbal9664
    @jericotimbal9664 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    boxer apc

  • @OffordDarcy
    @OffordDarcy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the difference between the Lynx and the Puma?

    • @tobias8672
      @tobias8672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lynx is intended primarily for export. The Puma was built specifically to meet the requirements of the Bundeswehr. Both of them are IFV's.

    • @Jannis368
      @Jannis368 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tobias8672 sorry you're right, I had Panther in my mind.

    • @danielreinfelder4410
      @danielreinfelder4410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And the german Government has paid the devolpment cost and own the license right. Rheinmetall will not pay fees and devolped the Lynx.

    • @heinzkabofke6791
      @heinzkabofke6791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The unmanned zurret and it’s 360 camera surveillance.
      That shit is too expensive for export.

    • @Solaris-ig7hh
      @Solaris-ig7hh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tobias8672 Wrong, the Lynx is an IFV carrring Panzergrenadiere, Soldiers. The Puma is a battle Tank and not an IFV! Thats something completly different!

  • @SJKile
    @SJKile 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You have ruined the specification part of the video at the end by putting in video links over the top of pertinent information.

  • @gerlachsieders4578
    @gerlachsieders4578 ปีที่แล้ว

    Similar to the Swedish CV90-family....

  • @Hector_Malot
    @Hector_Malot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Germans are very strong in commercial matters, but in reality they still have their rotten old Marder IFVs over fifty years old that are falling apart. In reality the Bundeswehr is in a very poor state with a lot of obsolete, old and non-operational equipment. I'm not sure that the 100 billion euros change anything.

    • @HedgehogZone
      @HedgehogZone ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dude the marder is just a keepsake and is getting retired by the puma!

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Bundeswehr is currently replacing the Marder with the Puma, world's most advanced IFV.

    • @Hector_Malot
      @Hector_Malot ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jonny2954 The first copies of Puma had revealed the first technical problems, water seeping into the interior. "The recent failures of the Puma infantry fighting vehicle are a major setback," Lambrecht said in a statement. Failing, the German armored Puma will not be engaged in NATO's very rapid reaction force. Germany suspends purchases of Puma tanks after operational problems. Germany will not buy more Puma infantry tanks until they have proven their reliability, Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht said on Monday after several of the vehicles were taken out of service during a recent military exercise. This Puma is a big shit!

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Hector_Malot Perhaps before quoting source you might want to look at the date they're coming from. This news is from last year, so over 2 months ago. The defense minister you are quoting literally isn't even in office anymore. Turned out after investigation that only 1 of 18 Pumas who had problems actually had any faults, and even these faults were caused by delayed logistics and maintentance, and not by the vehicles or their crews. The vehicles will take part in NATO VJTF as planned, and further orders are approved aswell, in even larger quanitity than before.
      What do we learn? Read the damn date on the article.

    • @jensbecker7066
      @jensbecker7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      U R right. Germany had a poor and useless military. The material is old and rotten. The Soldiers are fat and lame. And every one on the world should now that. :-) No one should be afraid of us germans.

  • @fangan4770
    @fangan4770 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can you do a review of something when you can't even pronounce its name correctly?

  • @GB-hj3xp
    @GB-hj3xp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Javelin food

    • @Rick2010100
      @Rick2010100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The tank will only be delivered to Nato partner - so why should a other Nato partner with a Javelin fire on that tank?

    • @GB-hj3xp
      @GB-hj3xp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rick2010100 great point 🤔

    • @MaticTheProto
      @MaticTheProto 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can easily be upgraded with active protection

  • @Fistmybeer
    @Fistmybeer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Noice!!! :DDD