2024 Traditional Catholic Battle-Plan!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- How to pray the Rosary: traditionalcat......
Standard Links:
Patreon: / traditionalthomist
To be a Traditional Catholic, means to embrace and follow the Traditions of our Forefathers. Traditional Catholics must go exclusively to the Tridentine mass (not barring good eastern rites), and in charity and humility and without bitterness protest and resist the liturgical novelties and ruptures of the 1970 Missal (The New Mass).
Find a Latin Mass: sspx.org/en/co...
theliturgy.org...
www.latinmassd...
For viewers outside the US who need to find a Latin Mass: fsspx.org/en/c...
For UK viewers: lms.org.uk/mas...
* Note on Latin Mass attendance: I personally recommend you find an SSPX chapel if it is available, that way the preaching you will get will be guaranteed to be orthodox. If there is not an SSPX chapel near you, please go to your closest Latin Mass, just be aware that sometimes (not all the time), the preaching could have questionable elements due to the modern seminary training.
If there is not a Latin Mass near you, please find and Eastern Catholic (be cautious about certain rites) or Ordinariate near you.
Best Copy of the Summa Theologica By St. Thomas Aquinas:aquinas101.tho...
Just subscribed, God bless from Australia
Thank you!
Thank you for your very inspiring program and your new format. Going forward you must protect yourself from our greatest enemy, whom you'll be exposing with your wonderful apostolate. I recommend Father, Chad Rippinger's book, Deliverance Prayers. You will need those prayers to combat the retaliation that you will find the evil one personally sends you and through his minions, the demons! These prayers are incredibly powerful if used in conjunction with an intimate closeness and constant conversation with your guardian angel, and our Blessed Mother, the terror of demons.
Amen! Thank you for this word of prudence! Please pray for me, but most especially, please pray for the lost and dying for find Christ!
Thanks Nick for your dedication and time to make these available to us. ❤
Thank you. I'll be clicking the bell so I get notified of your videos.
I'm a fairly new Catholic and RCIA was lacking. I wish I were in a parish where priests would take time to teach. But like most parishes, it was taught by older laywomen. They are very well-meaning but they've been indoctrinated with that 60s-70s spirit of the age.
Welcome to the Church! Thank you for your support! I certainly hope that you find these videos helpful! If you have not already, check out your area for a Latin Mass. You will not be disappointed: www.latinmass.com/#Map
Thanks for all the content!
Thank you, Nick, for sharing these wonderful treasures that Holy Mother Church has given to us. God Bless you, Brother! A Blessed Feast of the Epiphany and a Blessed New Years! ✝️🙏
Thank you so much for this Nick. Much needed. Viva Cristo Rey!
Friend, I'm seriously thinking about reading the entire SUMMA, but I don't have any knowledge about Aquinas, his philosophy and terminology. What books would you recommend before diving into the Summa so as not to get lost and understand it?
thank you, it teach you how to read the summa?@@TheBanterYears
Peace Be With You Brother. Just Seen This Video. I’m From McAllen, Texas🇺🇸 I’m Looking Forward To Hear More of Your Messages. We Are Living In End Times And I Believe Many Of Us Catholics Need To Hear Messages Like This As Well Getting Others To Convert. We All Need The Traditional Church. ✝️
I like your plan, Cavazos
Thank you sir! Ave Maria!
@@thetraditionalthomist You’re welcome. Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
It looks like a great plan for the year.
I just read the section on the Sacraments from the Catechism of the Council of Trent and man does it speak harshly against what has happened with the Novus Ordo. It places ceremony at a high place in regards to the Sacraments. It seems today that people have taken to the exception that ceremony is not necessary for the validity of the Sacraments. While in fact ceremony "manifests religious reverence, displays the full effects of the Sacraments, and elevates us to sublime contemplation." What has happened in the modern Church has diluted what is true, good, and beautiful. I watched "The Catholics" last night and what a horrendous and despicable movie it was while also being quite prophetic about where the Church is heading now if things don't change.
This isn't necessarily towards this video or anyone but I see a theme of traditionalist vs the church. Do remember it shouldn't be and is wrong to look at traditional vs the church always put they pontiff decisions befores yours, perhaps yes they norvus ordo doesn't look good like they tlm this doesn't mean if they pope pushes for norvus ordo you need to be against him because at they end of they day the most traditional thing to do is trust they vicar of christ, truly be understanding of why they pope has restricted the tlm to a degree and it makes sense because he is trying ro promote unity though he isnt getting rid of the tlm.
With all due respect, I do not think you have listened to most of the Traditionalist arguments against the idea of "Blind obedience to the Pope".
''How do you see obedience to the pope?"
The principles governing obedience are known and are so in conformity with sane reason and common sense that one is driven to wonder how intelligent persons can make a statement like, "They prefer to be mistaken with the pope, than to be with the truth against the pope."
That is not what the natural law teaches, nor the Magisterium of the Church. Obedience presupposes an authority which gives an order or issues a law. Human authorities, even those instituted by God, have no authority other than to attain the end apportioned them by God and not to turn away from it. When an authority uses power in opposition to the law for which this power was given it, such an authority has no right to be obeyed and one must disobey it.
This need to disobey is accepted with regard to a family father who would encourage his daughter to prostitute herself, with regard to the civil authority which would oblige doctors to perform abortions and kill innocent souls, yet people accept in every case the authority of the pope, who is supposedly infallible in his government and in all words. Such an attitude betrays a sad ignorance of history and of the true nature of papal infallibility.
A long time ago St. Paul said to St. Peter that he was "Not walking according to the truth of the Gospel" (Gal. 2:14). St. Paul encouraged the faithful not to obey him, St. Paul, if he happened to preach any other gospel than the Gospel that he had already taught them (Gal. 1:8).
St. Thomas, when he speaks of fraternal correction, alludes to St. Paul's resistance to St. Peter and he makes the following comment:
To resist openly and in public goes beyond the measure of fraternal correction. St. Paul would not have done it towards St. Peter if he had not in some way been his equal... We must realize, however, that if there was question of a danger for the Faith, the superiors would have to be rebuked by their inferiors, even in public."
This is clear from the manner and reason for St. Paul's acting as he did with regard to St. Peter, whose subject he was, in such a way, says the gloss of St. Augustine:
that the very head of the Church showed to superiors that if they ever chanced to leave the straight and narrow path, they should accept to be corrected by their inferiors." (St. Thomas [in the Summa Theologica] IIa, IIae, q.33, art. 4, ad 2)
The case evoked by St. Thomas is not merely imaginary because it took place with regard to John XXII during his life. This pope thought he could state as a personal opinion that the souls of the elect do not enjoy the Beatific Vision until after the Last Judgment. He wrote this opinion down in 1331 and in 1332 he preached a similar opinion with regard to the pains of the damned. He had the intention of putting forward this opinion in a solemn decree.
But the very lively action on the part of the Dominicans, above all in Paris, and of the Franciscans, made him renounce this opinion in favor of the traditional opinion defined by his successor, Benedict XII, in 1336.
And here is what Pope Leo XIII said in his Encyclical Libertas Praestantissimum, June 20,1888:
If, then, by any one in authority, something be sanctioned out of conformity with the principles of right reason, and consequently hurtful to the commonwealth, such an enactment can have no binding force of law."
And a little further on, he says:
But where the power to command is wanting, or where a law is enacted contrary to reason, or to the eternal law, or to some ordinance of God, obedience is unlawful, lest while obeying man, we become disobedient to God."
Now our disobedience is motivated by the need to keep the Catholic Faith. The orders being given us clearly express that they are being given us in order to oblige us to submit without reserve to the Second Vatican Council, to the post-conciliar reforms, and to the prescriptions of the Holy See, that is to say, to the orientations and acts which are undermining our Faith and destroying the Church. It is impossible for us to do this. To collaborate in the destruction of the Church is to betray the Church and to betray Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Now all the theologians worthy of this name teach that if the pope, by his acts, destroys the Church, we cannot obey him (Vitoria: Obras, pp.486-487; Suarez: De fide, disp.X, sec.VI, no.16; St. Robert Bellarmine: de Rom. Pont., Book 2, Ch.29; Cornelius a Lapide: ad Gal. 2,11, etc.) and he must be respectfully, but publicly, rebuked.
The principles governing obedience to the pope's authority are the same as those governing relations between a delegated authority and its subjects. They do not apply to the Divine Authority which is always infallible and indefectible and hence incapable of failing. To the extent that God has communicated His infallibility to the pope and to the extent that the pope intends to use this infallibility, which involves four very precise conditions in its exercise, there can be no failure.
Outside of these precisely fixed conditions, the authority of the pope is fallible and so the criteria which bind us to obedience apply to his acts. Hence it is not inconceivable that there could be a duty of disobedience with regard to the pope.
The authority which was granted him was granted him for precise purposes and in the last resort for the glory of the Holy Trinity, for Our Lord Jesus Christ, and for the salvation of souls.
Whatever would be carried out by the pope in opposition to this purpose would have no legal value and no right to be obeyed, nay, rather, it would oblige us to disobey in order for us to remain obedient to God and faithful to the Church.
This holds true for everything that the recent popes have commanded in the name of Religious Liberty or ecumenism since the Council: all the reforms carried out under this heading are deprived of any legal standing or force of law. In these cases the popes use their authority contrary to the end for which this authority was given them. They have a right to be disobeyed by us.
I slept at the fourth line. You should stop promoting the latin mass which is schismatic and not hyperqualified
@@kianoghuz1033 they sspx is schismatic, not all tlm is schismatic in fact most are approved and licit
@@thetraditionalthomist respectfully I don't want to read all that so can you explain it like I'm 5? Obviously we have to love and respect they pope but what are they limit of criticism and what are they limits of obedience to they pope? I'm personally worried about going into this traditional Latin mass sort of route because I don't want to become schismatic and I know a lot of "trads" are sedavacantist or sspx.
@@SaintAthanasius_Edits The SSPX is NOT Schismatic. I recommend you read this article that is a compilation of everything Rome has said on the Subject: catholicfamilynews.com/blog/2023/04/28/sspx-masses-and-fulfilling-the-sunday-obligation/
The solution is to get to a TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS if you can. There you will experience ABUNDANT REVERENCE and GRACES. GOD LOVE YOU !!!!
Or the Ordinariate, or a Novus Ordo that actually follows Sacrosanctum Concilium, or an Eastern Catholic parish. Basically anything that is obedient to what the Church has always taught in her doctrine about liturgy.
I like much of what you do Nicholas and thank you. I do not like the term “conciliar church” that you and so many others use. There is only one church but she is clearly infiltrated by Judas’. Giving the impression there is a true church and a conciliar church sounds like M Luther. Does that make sense? God bless
I appreciate the support and the criticism. I use the phrase Conciliar Church, which is merely what the reformers in the Church called themselves. They told Archbishop Lefebvre that they are the Conciliar Church. There is a formal but not material distinction between the Catholic Church and the Conciliar Church.
I recommend if you would like more info on the subject, check out my video called: "Is the Conciliar Church the Catholic Church?". Thank you for your imput!
@@thetraditionalthomist I will thank you!