OJ did it. In the beginning I didnt want to believe that my childhood football hero could do such a thing. I admired OJ as a black man who made it who could offer black kids like me a sense of pride. I watched majority of the 9 month trial. I was waiting for a smoking gun pointing to someone else. But i have no doubt with the DNA evidence that he did it. Especially with this book "hypothetical " or not. He needed to confess to get it off his chest.
@@tamimoncrief2264I think he created Charlie to cover up how OJ had been stalking Nicole and saw she might be expecting company and to cover how he got rid of the evidence. It makes little sense except to cover his ego, stalking looks desperate.
"I kept the knife on hand for the crazies." He's so crazy he doesn't have enough awareness to know the crazies was him! I also bet that gate was broken because of him too.
Smh y'all act like this woman wasn't a human I'm sure she did shit to provoke him and shit up wit him too damn y'all folks making me sick Abt Nicole like she was just prefect
Goes from a hypothetical where he could make up anything to not remembering how he murdered his wife and a waiter, if you are the storyteller you could say anything you want, he slips from storytelling to actually being there
Showing up with gloves on, a knife, & a beanie hat in all black tells you everything thing you need to know about what his plans was…Ron was just a innocent victim cause he was a witness…
He just said in the previous chapter that he "did not leave the recital upset and angry...". Yet here he is saying "I was in a lousy mood after the recital." And he was upset about what Ron Fischman said to him there.
Exactly. Nicole didn’t save him a seat and he had to sit behind them. Then he wasn’t invited to the dinner after. You add in her affair with Marcus Allen and OJ was enraged. He actually bought the disguise kit (that was later found after the chase) on May 27th.
He sat on same row.as Nicole...he didn't need an invite as he was expected to go to the dinner but declined..Marcus denied the affair to this day...the disguise kit is what Hollywood personas wear to not be seen at times in public. Try harder
Ron borrowed the Ferrari that OJ bought Nicole and took his friend Craig to lunch. Supposedly OJ saw him driving the Ferrari. I think he knew exactly who Ron was that night 😔
Young people think things are just given to you. Ron thought he could weasel his way into high society until he met the devil Orenthal Simpson that night in June/12/1994.
He in fact DID NOT ask about if the kids were okay during the police call. The lead police investigator has spoken about that and the evidence in Oj's home That was inadmissible during trial.
He would show up at Nicoles place hollering booting the door in knowing full well the kids were sleeping. Left her bleeding out on the walkeay for them to find her, in his suicide note he doesn’t mention the kids, he was going to blow his brains out in Kardashians bedroom, then takes off with a gun in the Bronco to off himself. This all speaks of ego and impulsivity. Well the kids lost their mother and now he was going to double their pain by offing himself so his pain stopped! What about their pain and Nicole and Ron the Browns and Goldmans. Sickening.
@Kns567 Actually you got that wrong …. he wrote 3 letters …. only 1 was read to the public by rob Kardashian ……he wrote another to his mother and 1 more to his kids …
He sounds like he was overthinking Nicole. Lots of excessive words. I think he was obsessed w her. He knew she was leaving . He knew it was over. This was a disaster waiting to happen.
He was a narcissist, and leaving a narcissist can be extremely scary. I've seen it first-hand. The threats, the stalking, the delusions, the insane justifications for their actions, I could go on forever. I feel so bad for Nichole, I bet we only know a fraction of what she went through. I feel bad for Ron too, poor guy didn't deserve it
It’s quite interesting - and revealing of his narcissism and denial - that he glosses over the murders and immediately reverts back to defensiveness and operating under the idea that he is innocent… copping an attitude about the cut on his finger (trying to claim it happened the next day), the whole thing with the bags… it’s bizarre. It’s like he finally admitted what he did but then went right back to spending the remainder of the book trying to defend himself and claim innocence? Just goes to show his ego would never allow him to admit - to himself, as well as others - that he was guilty. But considering the whole point of this book was “if I did it,” I think it’s very strange that he apparently still spent most of the book trying to convince people he was an innocent, framed man.
I guess I’m the old fart in the comments….there was no question he did it back when it happened. DNA evidence. The science was new to us at the time but we all knew what it meant. Ask anyone who was around….that verdict was to stick it to LAPD & any other racist for the abuse endured by the black community which was immeasurable. Period.
False! This verdict wasn’t simply to “stick it to the police”. U still had to go through the evidence. Detective lang said it himself, once furman plead the fifth when asked abt “planting evidence “, no white black, or green jury would convict. Game over! Factor in the times, which police were getting off from planting evidence & abusing black folks regularly , u had an easy verdict. Just bc u know someone did it, in court you must PROVE how they did it. With no doubts.
You're so right. I watched the entire 9 month trial. After all that evidence for them to review and discuss, they only took 4 hours total for a verdict? Marsha Clark, post trial, talked about telling the potential jurors that it was her DA's Office that charged the Rodney King police officers who attacked him with crimes, that they tried to get him justice. But a juror was overheard afterwards saying "No this is payback" as reported by another juror who heard it.
@@carlabarrick8538 Correct. Not to mention the jurors being sequestered for 265 days, longer than any previous jury in American history. That’s a long time to be cut off from the world. It was the perfect storm. Young people today think the black community thought he was innocent….it was the opposite which made the verdict all the more crazy which was the entire point
But wait until the 30th anniversary, when they re- investigate and " suddenly realize " that Glen Edward Rogers really was the one who commited the murders 7:27 . YA know , just like how the Central Park 5 were exonerated . Of course I don't buy any of it, but The Central Park 5 were not at all innocent , but now lauded as some kinda heroes.
When did this book get released and who is walking down memory lane now that he is dead. Anyway, this guy did infact do it. He was such an ego, he wrote a book confessing to it.
This is a beyond fk'd up situation. Unreal how he could write this book whether he did it or not! So bizarre. If he was trying to "rehabilitate" his image after he got away with it this wasn't the way to do it!!
The biggest reason I thought he did it without the blood evidence, listen closely. He acted just like a guilty person that killed those two people. He went and had a gun to his head. He wasn't worried about anything else but running around feeling sorry for himself acting like he was going to kill himself. That's exactly how any guilty person would act.
So, he describes how he went there and confronted his victims, but acts surprised when he got the call they were dead??!!?? This dude is a narcissistic murderer.
What’s sick and crazy is ojs eldest son has intermittent rage disorder so ojs description of the murders is very similar to symptoms of that…these were sick people. Everyone needed to separate see a psychiatrist and get on medication. Oj probably had CTE.
He lied about not retrieving Paula Barbieri's vm from that morning, breaking up with him. He called the cheerleader and told her he was "a totally free man."
@@infamousla815 well, in light of this new information, I guess I’ll have to rethink my entire position on this matter since his writing the book 12 years later rather than 20 years later somehow invalidates my original point 😒
Yes. Kato talked about it in an interview I just watched a couple days ago. Kato was like an uncle to Nicole’s kids and they asked to name the dog after him.
💗💃 Enjoyed this series. Couple of points the prosecutor's case was "not" based on there was an accomplice and some of this hypothical story doesn't match the evidence
Who wants to bet OJ was the one on coke? OJ saw how beautiful and young Nicole looked at the recital, (he mentioned her outfit many times), that she was really done with him, then heard Ron call Nicole's Mom "Judy" (personal) and the dog wagging it's tail at Ron (familiar?) and Nicole's little black dress and the candles sent him right over the freaking edge. That's all it took for his fragile narcissistic ego to lose his crap.
Kato’s story on Vlad is pretty cool. Kato wasn’t a free loader or pot head. He was actually Nicole’s friend and the defense kept protraying him as a freeloader to make him seem not credible
He litterally says he wondered what other things Nicole was up to that night and remembered the night she was going at it on the couch with Keith (at her previous house). He said he couldn't stop thinking about her that night and was so angry. He went there to spy on her and when he saw Goldman, he went into a rage. He blacked out committing the murders.
@@pitotzen2387 Despicable. I'll never understand how a person could do something so horrendous. And the possibility of the children waking up to see that. What a terrible father and he never should've gotten custody of them. Nicole even said in her diary that he wanted her to have an abortion when she was pregnant with Justin.
Amazing isn’t it how much detail oj can remember but when he starts stabbing Ron and Nicole yeah he just draws a blank. A knit cap, gloves and a knife to just go talk?? Also Charlie going back to Rockingham I am surprised oj didn’t take him out too because he was a witness. The part where Ron says “Judy” seemed to set oj off maybe he thought is Ron taking his future spot in the family? Is that why oj went after him? The candles all lit up in the apt if not for Ron who then and did that suitor take off when he saw the bloody scene?
Charlie was a creation to explain how OJ knew Nicole was possibly expecting a visitor, as OJ had actually stalked her apartment after Kato went back to his room. A generous person would say OJ had a psychotic break. I wouldn’t.
Charlie is Charlie Erlich, a real person and OJs accomplice. How did he have time to ditch the bloody clothes and knife? Why did the limo driver never see the bronco?
@@JamesYates-xk2pq Alan Park, the limo driver, saw OJ stuff materials from one of his bags into the trash right as he dropped OJ off at the airport. As to why he did not see the Bronco, it was not there when he parked at Rockingham gate. OJ pulled up after he had parked, so Alan Park never saw the bronco.
@@SilmeonMusic Fair point. Maybe at that point limo driver was running late and was done noticing things and now was trying to devise a plan to get him to the airport very quickly
He switched up the characters Charlie is JASON SIMPSON OJ was actually asking "charlie" what the f**k went on here that's why "charlie" was crying and looking stunned
The way he was talking in this chapter, he telling charlie to ditch the evidence, park the Bronco for him, put the keys in the mailbox and get out of dodge.
Maybe it's possible that Simpson knew more about Nicole Brown thann most! Let's state that as a fact even! What knife? Where is it? Where was it? What happened to it ? It isn't enough that it was circumstantial evidence! You're inventing a knife according to a guy that nobody knows
OJ it was not Nicole's fault that you didn't want to let her go on with her life. You wanted to control every aspect of her life including her love life. Pity...
Does anyone else not see that oj is literally playing with y’all. The evidence doesn’t reflect this scenario. He’s guilty but this is literally him trolling tf out of this situation.
The evidence reflects it good enough. Even the experts said their opinion of the attack was theoretical the best they could based on the evidence they had. OJs confession left out a few things such as he moved back and forth from victim to victim a couple times but that would have taken place during his “black out”. In reality he didn’t black out, he remembers every detail of the attack just as good as he remembers the details of the seconds leading up to it and after it. He simply was too cowardly to speak the horrors of the attack, or his ego wouldn’t let him
Yeah but sorry OJ, charlie doesnt exist and only your footprints were at the scene of the crime. So even when youre telling the truth you have to lie. May God have mercy on your soul OJ
I just realized how was Faye gonna be at Nicole house wit some boy toys getting wild wen she was in rehab and O.J knew she wasn't at Nicole's house so yea I believe he committed those murders
Ok and his friend Charles,helped oin the murder. There was two different types of knife used on Ron. Charlie had a bigger knife, and OJ had a pocket knife. There's a big difference and Charlie finally confessed to it
Yes O.J. did those murders, but the innocent waiter just being in the wrong place wrong time never washed with me, Ron had been seen driving Nicole’s Ferrari and I’m old enough to remember the trial and the rumour was Ron was fucking Nicole and my theory he’s turned up that night with the intention of getting some punani, now either Nicole during arguing with O.J. has rubbed his nose in it by telling him what she plans to do with Ron and it’s non of oj’s business and he snapped or Ron has tried to get involved in the argument between them and O.J. has knifed him, Ron’s autopsy shows O.J. tormented Ron before finishing him off which shows malice, if Ron was just in the wrong place wrong time why would O.J. be tormenting a dying Ron by drawing the knife across his throat
Yeah there had to have been an accomplice and obviously it was someone very close to OJ, that’s why he always put emphasis on “someone I had met a few months ago” when describing Charlie, to put off questions about his son
OJ did it. In the beginning I didnt want to believe that my childhood football hero could do such a thing. I admired OJ as a black man who made it who could offer black kids like me a sense of pride. I watched majority of the 9 month trial. I was waiting for a smoking gun pointing to someone else. But i have no doubt with the DNA evidence that he did it. Especially with this book "hypothetical " or not. He needed to confess to get it off his chest.
Yes
The Bruno Magli shoes were the key, OJ calls them " ugly ass shoes " they put him at the crime scene.
I agree. The DNA isn't lying. He's lying! He makes me sick 😡 🤮
The drug dealers did it.
Lol. Yep
Charlie is just a construct. Charlie is OJs alter ego.
Charlie was a real guy
Charlie Ehrlich is his real friend. He was also at the Vegas heist.
@@philopino9012 Definitely, Chris Todd has done great videos on the subject!
Not a friend. Charlie is a Decavalconti Enforcer. Denise brown boyfriend was a mafia hitman
Or oj’s oldest son was at the scene with him..
This was his earthly confession.
Crazy shit
Hypothetical
He told her to just have fun??!!! Yeah right OJ!! Lol
Bro went from describing the murders in vivid detail to pretending he was completely innocent and had no idea what was going on. OJ was wild🥴
Charlie was the demon living inside him
@@tamimoncrief2264I think he created Charlie to cover up how OJ had been stalking Nicole and saw she might be expecting company and to cover how he got rid of the evidence. It makes little sense except to cover his ego, stalking looks desperate.
Just the way OJ barks orders and expected people to comply immediately tells me he's used to getting his way.
@@AnthonyL0401it was a dude in the mob there’s some info that came out recently.
@@thatbasketballchannel9970Anybody can say anything, it doesn’t make it fact. DNA is indisputable and it was everywhere. Don’t be so gullible.
All OJ ever cared about was his image, the facade and being famous.
Well I think being cheated on and having those problems makes some men homicidal
"I kept the knife on hand for the crazies." He's so crazy he doesn't have enough awareness to know the crazies was him! I also bet that gate was broken because of him too.
I don't care if it's not OJs voice this shit is interesting
Exactly.
Isn't this OJ's voice we're listening to?
@@hcanderson3787No
The title of the video says voiced by oj Simpson
@@hcanderson3787if you’ve heard even one interview with OJ you’ll know this isn’t him
Yet no drugs found in her system. And her safety deposit box with all her documents of his abuse.
A simple preliminary urine test of her corps was negative. The more detailed blood draw from coroner was never released.
Smh y'all act like this woman wasn't a human I'm sure she did shit to provoke him and shit up wit him too damn y'all folks making me sick Abt Nicole like she was just prefect
Drugs were found in her system.
Charlie is real. And it’s his Son Jason. He is the one who parked the Bronco back in driveway after limousine left with OJ
@@MattVrazel-xy1hjI don't think Charlie was his son Jason at all
Goes from a hypothetical where he could make up anything to not remembering how he murdered his wife and a waiter, if you are the storyteller you could say anything you want, he slips from storytelling to actually being there
Showing up with gloves on, a knife, & a beanie hat in all black tells you everything thing you need to know about what his plans was…Ron was just a innocent victim cause he was a witness…
He just said in the previous chapter that he "did not leave the recital upset and angry...". Yet here he is saying "I was in a lousy mood after the recital." And he was upset about what Ron Fischman said to him there.
Exactly. Nicole didn’t save him a seat and he had to sit behind them. Then he wasn’t invited to the dinner after. You add in her affair with Marcus Allen and OJ was enraged. He actually bought the disguise kit (that was later found after the chase) on May 27th.
He sat on same row.as Nicole...he didn't need an invite as he was expected to go to the dinner but declined..Marcus denied the affair to this day...the disguise kit is what Hollywood personas wear to not be seen at times in public.
Try harder
It’s telling how he admits being at the murder but denies he had the cut. He wants the explanation on his own terms
Ron borrowed the Ferrari that OJ bought Nicole and took his friend Craig to lunch. Supposedly OJ saw him driving the Ferrari.
I think he knew exactly who Ron was that night 😔
He knew who he was
Young people think things are just given to you. Ron thought he could weasel his way into high society until he met the devil Orenthal Simpson that night in June/12/1994.
He knew about the relationship between her and Ron, he may not have known his name, but he knew about him.
He did it. No if's ands or but:s
Yeah,but……yeah no doubt he did it.
I'd say "man I wish he would have confessed before he died" but literally he did.
[if] I DID IT
was published & written, by
Judith Reagan
The copyrights of the book belong to Fred Goldman
It isn't Simpsons confession of anything
I loved O.J and still do
He in fact DID NOT ask about if the kids were okay during the police call. The lead police investigator has spoken about that and the evidence in Oj's home That was inadmissible during trial.
Damn..... I've never thought about that.
He would show up at Nicoles place hollering booting the door in knowing full well the kids were sleeping. Left her bleeding out on the walkeay for them to find her, in his suicide note he doesn’t mention the kids, he was going to blow his brains out in Kardashians bedroom, then takes off with a gun in the Bronco to off himself. This all speaks of ego and impulsivity. Well the kids lost their mother and now he was going to double their pain by offing himself so his pain stopped! What about their pain and Nicole and Ron the Browns and Goldmans. Sickening.
@Kns567 Actually you got that wrong …. he wrote 3 letters …. only 1 was read to the public by rob Kardashian ……he wrote another to his mother and 1 more to his kids …
@@amirsim2479 that’s the only one I am referencing - the one Robert read out.
He also never asked what happened or how Nicole died on that phone call.
Wish they would have agreed to studying oj’s brain
Yes! evidence of CTE would help explain a lot and advance the research on repeated blows to the brain.
Guarantee that he blacked out in fits of rage like that wrestler who did a very similar thing…
The narration is crazy😅
How so?
He sounds like he was overthinking Nicole. Lots of excessive words. I think he was obsessed w her. He knew she was leaving . He knew it was over.
This was a disaster waiting to happen.
He was a narcissist, and leaving a narcissist can be extremely scary. I've seen it first-hand. The threats, the stalking, the delusions, the insane justifications for their actions, I could go on forever. I feel so bad for Nichole, I bet we only know a fraction of what she went through. I feel bad for Ron too, poor guy didn't deserve it
Kato sounds like a pothead, always in a haze😶🌫️
Better to be a pothead than a murderer.
How did he not hear the murder
@@badgirlhollywood9741 It happened on Bundy. Kato was not living there. He lived at Rockingham at OJ’s
@@badgirlhollywood9741 The murder took place miles away at a different house (Nicole’s).
The majority of us 18yr olds at the time thought of him like a surfer beach dude so you’re spot on
It’s quite interesting - and revealing of his narcissism and denial - that he glosses over the murders and immediately reverts back to defensiveness and operating under the idea that he is innocent… copping an attitude about the cut on his finger (trying to claim it happened the next day), the whole thing with the bags… it’s bizarre. It’s like he finally admitted what he did but then went right back to spending the remainder of the book trying to defend himself and claim innocence? Just goes to show his ego would never allow him to admit - to himself, as well as others - that he was guilty. But considering the whole point of this book was “if I did it,” I think it’s very strange that he apparently still spent most of the book trying to convince people he was an innocent, framed man.
I guess I’m the old fart in the comments….there was no question he did it back when it happened. DNA evidence. The science was new to us at the time but we all knew what it meant. Ask anyone who was around….that verdict was to stick it to LAPD & any other racist for the abuse endured by the black community which was immeasurable. Period.
Absolutely!!!
False! This verdict wasn’t simply to “stick it to the police”. U still had to go through the evidence. Detective lang said it himself, once furman plead the fifth when asked abt “planting evidence “, no white black, or green jury would convict. Game over! Factor in the times, which police were getting off from planting evidence & abusing black folks regularly , u had an easy verdict. Just bc u know someone did it, in court you must PROVE how they did it. With no doubts.
You're so right. I watched the entire 9 month trial. After all that evidence for them to review and discuss, they only took 4 hours total for a verdict? Marsha Clark, post trial, talked about telling the potential jurors that it was her DA's Office that charged the Rodney King police officers who attacked him with crimes, that they tried to get him justice. But a juror was overheard afterwards saying "No this is payback" as reported by another juror who heard it.
@@carlabarrick8538 Correct. Not to mention the jurors being sequestered for 265 days, longer than any previous jury in American history. That’s a long time to be cut off from the world. It was the perfect storm. Young people today think the black community thought he was innocent….it was the opposite which made the verdict all the more crazy which was the entire point
You nailed it. In the documentary "OJ: Made in America " one juror admitted that the verdict was payback for Rodney King.
My thoughts and Prayers are with his Children.
I like how he talks about how weak and old he feels the day of the murders 🫠🫠🫠🫠🙄
Dude was like 40. He was really exaggerating😊. He acts like he was 90😂😂
Thank You!!! Been watching these all day!!!
I can’t get enough of them.
My HONEST thoughts right now 38:37: 💭 He did it!
But wait until the 30th anniversary, when they re- investigate and " suddenly realize " that Glen Edward Rogers really was the one who commited the murders 7:27 . YA know , just like how the Central Park 5 were exonerated . Of course I don't buy any of it, but The Central Park 5 were not at all innocent , but now lauded as some kinda heroes.
@@chriswaterman3823you’re a dope
When did this book get released and who is walking down memory lane now that he is dead. Anyway, this guy did infact do it. He was such an ego, he wrote a book confessing to it.
Late 90s? The Goldmans were given the rights to it and all moneys went to them, so it backfired on him
This is a beyond fk'd up situation. Unreal how he could write this book whether he did it or not! So bizarre. If he was trying to "rehabilitate" his image after he got away with it this wasn't the way to do it!!
Got arthritis everywhere but plays golf everyday 🙄
That's how he got arthritis from playing golf after his retirement from football damn y'all dumb
The biggest reason I thought he did it without the blood evidence, listen closely. He acted just like a guilty person that killed those two people. He went and had a gun to his head. He wasn't worried about anything else but running around feeling sorry for himself acting like he was going to kill himself. That's exactly how any guilty person would act.
This is soooo crazy… I’m speechless 😢
So, he describes how he went there and confronted his victims, but acts surprised when he got the call they were dead??!!?? This dude is a narcissistic murderer.
Says he innocent, writes a story how he did it while still acting like he didn't do it after he done it in the story, so many dimensions of crazy.
@@Jmatrixxxxxxxx Tells you he really did it.
What’s sick and crazy is ojs eldest son has intermittent rage disorder so ojs description of the murders is very similar to symptoms of that…these were sick people. Everyone needed to separate see a psychiatrist and get on medication. Oj probably had CTE.
He says Nicole lost her balance and fell as she was attacking him lol. He struck her over the head with the butt of his knife.
Even if Goldman was there to sleep with Nicole (which I don't think he was) it was NONE OF OJ'S BUSINESS!!!!
You don't know much about life do you...
@@Proverbs--tx6yr
Neither do I and neither do you
He was going to score. No one lets you drive their ferarai if they dont know you at all
No one is gonna mention this is not OJs voice … it isn’t his voice from part 2-6
Sure sounds like it
@@NINABERETTA😂😂😂
That was my first thought
The part I’ve been waiting for ty!
omg the dog detail
The burger went down wrong aww oj.. so that night he remembered thinking "that womans gonna be the death of me" aww oj
What kind of man/father would make a book like this about the murder of his children’s mother? Says lots about his character
He lied about not retrieving Paula Barbieri's vm from that morning, breaking up with him. He called the cheerleader and told her he was "a totally free man."
If Ron knows Kung Fu then this 100% is an explanation of what happened. How else would he know that??
A lot of good it did him.. O.J. had not one scratch on him
Well, devils advocate, he wrote this book 20 years after that information was made public. That said, he clearly did it
@@ericcord5913he wrote it 12 years later
@@infamousla815 well, in light of this new information, I guess I’ll have to rethink my entire position on this matter since his writing the book 12 years later rather than 20 years later somehow invalidates my original point 😒
Wait the dog’s name was Kato too? 😂
Yes. Kato talked about it in an interview I just watched a couple days ago. Kato was like an uncle to Nicole’s kids and they asked to name the dog after him.
Yes the kids named him.
Lol that’s what I been wondering
@@johnulcer Thank you for answering! It makes a great dog name. Here I thought it was some wild coincidence.
❤❤🥰🌹🌹🌹💪🏾❤️🔥❤️🔥
This is Very interesting 💯
GUILTY 🔒
💗💃 Enjoyed this series. Couple of points the prosecutor's case was "not" based on there was an accomplice and some of this hypothical story doesn't match the evidence
Popcorn 🍿
Only the dense/racist or both actually believe he was an innocent man.
Who wants to bet OJ was the one on coke? OJ saw how beautiful and young Nicole looked at the recital, (he mentioned her outfit many times), that she was really done with him, then heard Ron call Nicole's Mom "Judy" (personal) and the dog wagging it's tail at Ron (familiar?) and Nicole's little black dress and the candles sent him right over the freaking edge. That's all it took for his fragile narcissistic ego to lose his crap.
Kato’s story on Vlad is pretty cool. Kato wasn’t a free loader or pot head. He was actually Nicole’s friend and the defense kept protraying him as a freeloader to make him seem not credible
If he knows who did it. Why wouldn't he turn him in.
He litterally says he wondered what other things Nicole was up to that night and remembered the night she was going at it on the couch with Keith (at her previous house). He said he couldn't stop thinking about her that night and was so angry. He went there to spy on her and when he saw Goldman, he went into a rage. He blacked out committing the murders.
He didn’t black out, he remembers every detail as good as the before and after. He simply was too cowardly to speak it or his ego wouldn’t let him
@@pitotzen2387 Despicable. I'll never understand how a person could do something so horrendous. And the possibility of the children waking up to see that. What a terrible father and he never should've gotten custody of them. Nicole even said in her diary that he wanted her to have an abortion when she was pregnant with Justin.
Hypothetical my ass. That's a blatant confession that answers every and any question with great detail.
❤❤❤
Jury should be disgusted with themselves
I think he was using AC as Charlie
Omg he did it😥
Fact
Amazing isn’t it how much detail oj can remember but when he starts stabbing Ron and Nicole yeah he just draws a blank. A knit cap, gloves and a knife to just go talk?? Also Charlie going back to Rockingham I am surprised oj didn’t take him out too because he was a witness. The part where Ron says “Judy” seemed to set oj off maybe he thought is Ron taking his future spot in the family? Is that why oj went after him? The candles all lit up in the apt if not for Ron who then and did that suitor take off when he saw the bloody scene?
Charlie was a creation to explain how OJ knew Nicole was possibly expecting a visitor, as OJ had actually stalked her apartment after Kato went back to his room. A generous person would say OJ had a psychotic break. I wouldn’t.
Charlie is Charlie Erlich, a real person and OJs accomplice. How did he have time to ditch the bloody clothes and knife? Why did the limo driver never see the bronco?
@@JamesYates-xk2pq Alan Park, the limo driver, saw OJ stuff materials from one of his bags into the trash right as he dropped OJ off at the airport. As to why he did not see the Bronco, it was not there when he parked at Rockingham gate. OJ pulled up after he had parked, so Alan Park never saw the bronco.
@@AnthonyL0401but they exit the gate where the bronco would be when they leave the house to the airport…
@@SilmeonMusic Fair point. Maybe at that point limo driver was running late and was done noticing things and now was trying to devise a plan to get him to the airport very quickly
@@AnthonyL0401 yea whatever it was OJ was one lucky SOB to have so many things left to reasonable doubt that night ha
He switched up the characters Charlie is JASON SIMPSON OJ was actually asking "charlie" what the f**k went on here that's why "charlie" was crying and looking stunned
Charlie is code for a Vietnamese friend of Ojay's.
he's from the viet cong.
At 25:50 you know Charlie is a white guy….totally the way a white person would talk in situation such as this.
The way he was talking in this chapter, he telling charlie to ditch the evidence, park the Bronco for him, put the keys in the mailbox and get out of dodge.
Maybe it's possible that Simpson knew more about
Nicole Brown thann most!
Let's state that as a fact even!
What knife? Where is it?
Where was it?
What happened to it ?
It isn't enough that it was circumstantial evidence!
You're inventing a knife according to a guy that nobody knows
I thought skip was a random guy at the airport
OJ it was not Nicole's fault that you didn't want to let her go on with her life. You wanted to control every aspect of her life including her love life. Pity...
I can't belive he used his Owen kids for he's own guilt
On the interview oj did for "if I had done it" he blamed Charlie. Where did this scenario come from?
Does anyone else not see that oj is literally playing with y’all. The evidence doesn’t reflect this scenario. He’s guilty but this is literally him trolling tf out of this situation.
The evidence reflects it good enough. Even the experts said their opinion of the attack was theoretical the best they could based on the evidence they had. OJs confession left out a few things such as he moved back and forth from victim to victim a couple times but that would have taken place during his “black out”. In reality he didn’t black out, he remembers every detail of the attack just as good as he remembers the details of the seconds leading up to it and after it. He simply was too cowardly to speak the horrors of the attack, or his ego wouldn’t let him
Can someone explain where he parked the Bronco when he got back to Rockingham? I must have missed that part.
He just admitted having the glove and kap and knife like really
This is all hypothetical
Kado still hast the key he talks about in a interview hes charlie
A.I.O.J. 😂
The whole audiobook is free on Audible
It’s showing up as $10 for me.
It’s even free-er here
FINKEL IS EINHORN… CHARLIE IS OJ 😂
He did it but the prosecution and cops assigned to the case messed up everything for the victims. Everything aligned perfectly for OJ.
Today is Nicole birthday May 19th
What a cone man
Con
Guilty
Please tell me how e d t a showed up in the blood found on the socks and on the back fence ?
What a liar!
Yeah but sorry OJ, charlie doesnt exist and only your footprints were at the scene of the crime. So even when youre telling the truth you have to lie. May God have mercy on your soul OJ
No mercy for a soul like his.
How did he know the details so well??
Guilty Guilty Guilty, OJ Simpson
God finally finished what humans couldn’t
I just realized how was Faye gonna be at Nicole house wit some boy toys getting wild wen she was in rehab and O.J knew she wasn't at Nicole's house so yea I believe he committed those murders
I've always believed oj didn't do it!
King oj❤
more like emperor oj
OJS the best argument for birth control👍🏻
MORE LIKE CUCK OJ
Ok and his friend Charles,helped oin the murder. There was two different types of knife used on Ron. Charlie had a bigger knife, and OJ had a pocket knife. There's a big difference and Charlie finally confessed to it
Yes O.J. did those murders, but the innocent waiter just being in the wrong place wrong time never washed with me, Ron had been seen driving Nicole’s Ferrari and I’m old enough to remember the trial and the rumour was Ron was fucking Nicole and my theory he’s turned up that night with the intention of getting some punani, now either Nicole during arguing with O.J. has rubbed his nose in it by telling him what she plans to do with Ron and it’s non of oj’s business and he snapped or Ron has tried to get involved in the argument between them and O.J. has knifed him, Ron’s autopsy shows O.J. tormented Ron before finishing him off which shows malice, if Ron was just in the wrong place wrong time why would O.J. be tormenting a dying Ron by drawing the knife across his throat
Was Nicole alive when Ron arrived?
Need to change title (the night i did it )
Or why I did it.
Oj really was crazy it’s no Charles oj smh
So is Charlie Ac cowlings or possibly Jason Simpson someone had to help him do this
Yeah there had to have been an accomplice and obviously it was someone very close to OJ, that’s why he always put emphasis on “someone I had met a few months ago” when describing Charlie, to put off questions about his son
@@roddydykes7053 there's a charlie erilich who people day is the real charlie
Imagine being OJ's kids. He raised them after killing their Mom. Wow
Nicoles sister raised them
@@saressenelson4440O.J. did.
I thought it was Nicole's parents who raised them?
@@saressenelson4440 nope
@@LivingForTMH "Sharing joint custody with Simpson, Nicole's family managed to raise the children away from the spotlight."
Maybe charlie is Jason simpson
Who was this charlie guy?
CHARLIE ESTEVEZ
He's a liar. Lies lies lies ya their going to get you, lies lies lies ya they wont forget you. Doesnt matter anymore anyway.