IF I DID IT (PART SEVEN) VOICED BY MR. ORENTHAL SIMPSON
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 เม.ย. 2024
- Hi ! I’m Nina. I am so excited that you all enjoy this content as much as I do .
I’m new here , if you appreciate the content an would like to see me grow , please consider gifting me whatever you feel it’s worth . ❤️
Thank you!!
Cash App: $NOTHINGLESS44
IF I DID IT (PART SEVEN) VOICED BY MR. ORENTHAL SIMPSON #OJSIMPSON - เพลง
His narcissism is off the charts in this chapter. The lies, too.
As always, thank you for posting.
CHARLIE EHRLICH is the CHARLIE from IF I DID IT. Google CHARLIE EHRLICH MIAMI NEW TIMES.
@@playcards4166Another fictional character in the Simpson murder saga. And "Charlie" was just a random name Pablo Fenjves, ghostwriter of If I Did It, chose after OJ Simpson suggested he couldn't have committed the murders alone.
It’s like why was everything else the truth except for the night of the murders 🤔
Thank you for posting this series.
❤️
CHARLIE EHRLICH killed RON GOLDMAN with OJ SIMPSON. Google CHARLIE EHRLICH MIAMI NEW TIMES.
This book is like 95% accurate to what really happened.
Facts minus oj lying bout Charlie, Charlie is oj
@@macmizzle9106 Yup,if you read/listen to the whole book,you can tell "Charlie" was made up. And what's interesting also is that OJ said he had met "Charlie" right before the crime.
"Charlie" was simply the other side of his mind telling him how wrong he was.
@@macmizzle9106 Charlie's the demon inside oj 😳
The Goldman family changed alot of the book to fit there narrative because they own the rights
@@510fitness3 There's too many intricate details for that to be the case
Thanks for this audio book
Thanks for the uploads
Thank you for uploading ❤
❤❤❤❤ so good!!!
Unbelievable! Total confession knowing he can't be tried twice for the same murders I suppose.
It's like he is flashing a big duping delight grin to the world.
Wow
I love this book all the chapters are Great stories
Keep up the good OJ content! Keep it coming!
😊🤞🏽
CHARLIE EHRLICH is the CHARLIE from IF I DID IT. Google CHARLIE EHRLICH MIAMI NEW TIMES.
@@playcards4166 There is no charlie. Charlie was oj. You see, if charlie took the knife, like oj said, then it's not premeditated murder, but if oj took the knife then it is. Charlie is used to make sure people didn't think it was premeditated murder, which it was.
Nicole had a very unhealthy concept of what love was. They were both really broken and their relationship was completely and utterly toxic.
Yeah I think you hit the nail right on the head. Two emotional midgets left to their own devices. Shocking trouble took as long as it did to get outta hand
I think this book would've made a "good movie"....If I could say that without sounding weird/creepy. Perhaps a voice double could narrate as OJ. When we get to the night in question, producers can make the murder scene be ambiguous since it's still an unsolved case. To avoid copyright, instead of calling it 'If I did it', they can call it 'The Brentwood Murders' or 'Who Killed Ron and Nicole?' This book was interesting, but I don't think OJ killed them, but I think he knew who DID. I think he knew more than he let on.
Shout out to Detective Lange!!
Vannatter too
CHARLIE EHRLICH is CHARLIE from IF I DID IT. Google CHARLIE EHRLICH MIAMI NEW TIMES
🔥❤
So he lied about Charlie. He instructed him to park the Bronco inside the gate and run out but the cops found it parked crooked on the street. Charlie is a fictional character.
I guess we'll never know who killed those two poor souls. Bill Dear, the Texas Investigator, wrote a book and did a film documentary making a strong idea that Jason the son killed them.
Then a man named Norm Pardo has a documentary proving, to his investigation, that the homicidal killer Glen Roger's did it.
Now oj's dead and gave no deathbed confession.
@@David-vt3hnLord Have Mercy 😮😮the son killed Nicole and Ron 😮😮
@@David-vt3hnhis son killing them would make a lot of sense about how defensive he was over the identity of the accomplice, but not about the fact it “hypothetically” could’ve been him himself that committed the murders
Actually the Bronco blood evidence supports two bloodied people riding that night. Fair chance there was a Charlie, and OJ actually had a questionable "friend" named Charlie. Look into that if you wanna enter the rabbit hole.
@@marcrigor6423 If anyone, it was AC. An ex gf of his said he loaned OJ gloves and told her they'd never find the knife.
Wearing my ugly ass Bruno magli socks rn 🧡♾ Nicole & Ron
He never mentioned Ron Golgnan .
An innocent person wouldve asked WHO'S THE OTHER MAN found dead with Nicole, "who was she with"? WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, WHY & HOW?
Exactly you don’t hear your ex wife is dead and not ask how?
What a guilty fool
What was the purpose of this? It’s bizarre how it goes from him being at the scene of the crime all bloody to him saying he’s innocent. His description of what happened is so detailed. I can’t imagine him being creative enough to make that up. Who was Charlie supposed to be?
I wonder if there was really someone else there “Charlie” or just someone he made up to make him sound like he wasn’t alone. Who would go with him and stay silent? Because in his story Charlie didn’t even do anything.
OJ is "Charlie".
I think Charlie is his son
@@melissatthree Then you think wrong. His son Jason was a chef at a restaurant that night where there were many witnesses.
@@riverebec1 I watced a documentary a few years ago where they got his son may have been involved in it. If I remember correctly he would have had time after work .
I don't in any way think his son did it I just feel he might have covered for his dad
His son had a clock in card
Where he hand written his leave time… if there was someone else they must of stood back because surely there would be more foot prints ?
He messed up on that finger cut question. In the beginning he said it was from throwing the glass in the hotel room in Chicago. Later on he said it happened at the house. And he gets cuts all the time from golfing
If it doesn’t fit you must acquit w00t w00t !!!
Thank you for your uploads. How many chapers is it in total?
8 but I’ll upload other stories I think you will also find interesting 🤞🏽
Grateful to hear this. Clear it is more truthful than other accounts. Facts don’t support his innocence but the trial was a huge defense loss.
I believe oj about the relationship. Yt women are drama filled.
Sound alike
Sound a sorta a little like maybe if you cover your ears
Thank you so much for this.....I've always understood the why behind them blaming OJ now I really understand who did it......that damn serial killer named Glen, her handyman. smh
Rest Easy OJ Rest in Peace~~~~
Listen to part 6
Eehhhhhhh... What on earth are you talking about?
lol you watched that crazy movie
How did u conclude this? I’m really curious
@@princessm6355 How did I conclude what?... He said himself he stalked Nicole when he was spying through her window. Her friends have said he stalked her ... there is literally no sign that Nicole stalked him. You actually believe there was a Charlie ?... Tell me any signs that there was ever a Charlie?
Doesn’t sound like him, not him
You talked to him huh
@@NINABERETTA yes I have spoke with him and yes, he did do it …why don’t you watch a few interviews of him…. Listen….
And you too will hear the difference, instead of jumping right in and judging ppl, I’ll bet you don’t have many friends, I’ll pray for you.
Omg! OJ..Van Adder…OJ…Van Adder..OJ.. wtf?! FN terrible! Can’t do it
Reading from the court transcripts and that is exactly how the court reporter who records every word spoken in a court room will type these things out. Name of person speaking followed by what is said.
It's the transcript from the detective interrogation in the police room not the courtroom.
@@chrissyellem7397 it was introduced as evidence in court but whose counting? 😂
@@misselanys1219 someone who wants to be right all the time.
Honestly voices made this audio hard to listen too
How???
How