**THIS CLIP HAS BEEN REPOSTED TO PROVIDE A BETTER VIEWING COPY. OJ Simpson criminal trial from January 25th, 1995. (Christopher Darden, Johnnie Cochran, Raw, Uncut)
He was a wife abuser. He had a secret wife and kids. He wasn't a good lawyer. He was good at preaching and lying to get people like him to not pass judgment on O.j. He was a con artist and he died of a brain tumor.
can you imagine if Johnnie Cochran was the District Attorney and Darden was O.J.'s attorney. I would be willing to bet that he would have been found guilty.
Johnnnie Cochran played an integral role in the defense but you can’t discount what Alan, Barry and F Lee Bailey did for the case. IMO, with out any of those 4 lawyers, OJ would’ve been found guilty
Great combo. Johnny-smooth and charismatic. Perfect for speaking directly to the jury in Opening and Closing Statements. Bailey-cut-throat with ability to recall and destroy witnesses on the stand. Shapiro - calm presence and can take on any role but chose the leadership role. Just perfect for this particular case but I’m sure they are all good in their own right.
@@slyjokergThey should be ashamed for correctly ruling that there was NOT proof beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT that OJ committed the murders? Just admit you are a fanatic who never cared about the truth
I think that was the prosecutions big mistake…know the audience. Too long, too much science etc. I don’t think OJ would have won with Shipario. He was not relatable…but Cochran was a master. I still know OJ did it! He’s gone now 🔥
You simply type into the search function O J Simpson trial chronological order and you can then hit autoplay and watch it nonstop. There are 493 videos.
man the prosecution was completely OUTLAWYERED! notice how the prosecution was glued more to their papers than the defense. For a good opening or speaker in general, you can't be glued to the paper in front of you.
Watching the prosecution opening defense Cochran and his team were calm and silent listening to the opening statement. When it was Cochran turn for his opening statement and downplaying the prosecution with his smooth communicated evidences, the prosecution were shifting in their seats, interrupting Cochran for the judge to intervene, and staring with the we fucked up look 😅
It's hilarious seeing how disgraceful the audio/video was- in the last few hearings of kohberger (June-Aug 2023) COMPARED to a trial from 1995. Yeah, weird.... 1995's audio/visual is a billion times better than in 2023?? Hmm. 🤔🙄 Just listen & watch how clear, crisp, actually- compared to. It really makes you wonder, like you'd have to try hard to make it as bad as it is in Idaho trials.
the actor who played cochran in American Crime Story, the resemblance between both is uncanny. absolutely incredible casting. not just that, but the entire ensemble was perfectly cast.
"UNCUT" my ass. Here's what missing when Johnny Cochran is cut from approx. 12;45 up to and including 13:11. Here is what Mr. Cochran says during the dubbed portion of this "Uncut" OJ trial: ..."THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW THAT THE PROSECUTION IN THIS CASE HAS ENLISTED THE SERVICES OF MANY, MANY POLICE AGENCIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES, THE FBI, MANY LOCAL POLICE AGENCIES. THEY HAVE GONE AROUND THE WORLD TALKING TO WITNESSES. BUT THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW THEY FAILED TO GO NEXT DOOR TO MR. SIMPSON'S HOUSE AND TALK TO A WITNESS THAT THEY KNEW ABOUT WHO PROVIDED HIM WITH AN ALIBI, AND THERE ARE OTHER WITNESSES LIKE THAT AND WE WILL HAVE TO ONLY ASK OURSELVES WHY.... "
Johnny's statement is 100x as well thought out, fluid and powerful as the prosecution. he's 100x the lawyer they were. it didnt matter if OJ was guilty - 100 million people were treated into one of the great mind's of the 20th century. Johnny Cochran RIP
He can't even pronounce the word "picture" properly. He says "pitcher" and it makes him sound uneducated. He was a liar who would say anything to get his client acquitted. No ethics or integrity at all.
If you followed the trial without the media influence as I did during 1995 but I have watched just straight court room here and I understand how the jury voted not guilty... I’m not stating I don’t think he did it but the prosecution made many many mistakes..The burden is on the people..The so called dream team created more than enough reasonable doubt..The Law is very clear..you can’t find someone guilty just because you think he did it..The prosecution were just out lawyered..and Fung was a disaster for the prosecution..and that’s where collecting the evidence began..
You will see during closing how Darden tells the jury to go back to the opening argument where the defense promised you will see all of this evidence. Where was that evidence, it never materialized. Then Cochran gets up and says the defense doesn’t have the burden of proof. We can sit there and do nothing if we so choose. Darden made a great point, although Cochran was right, but who would remember 11 months ago?
🤯🤯 ~ I’ve heard more info than I ever knew before. I thought OJ was guilty all of my life, this new information is quite compelling to show that maybe he is not guilty. I know the trial is just starting, but I had to mention this. But for normal humans it’s difficult to change your mind when you have believe something your entire life, no matter how much evidence is thrown at you. I do think I’m better and having the ability to be self reflective, but that doesn’t mean I’m immune to emotional feelings. I recognize my emotions and why I’m having them more than I think the average person does, but I’m not immune.
@@annasrobloxchannel3816 the defense never tested the dna evidence. The prosecutions lab made a mistake on the report and the defense exploited that calling to question the reliability of the evidence. Smart of the defense but it doesn’t make Simpson less guilty, just the beneficiary of a good defensive strategy. The defense has the benefit of not having the burden of proving anything. All the defense needs to do is create doubt and attack every bit of evidence that points to Simpson’s guilt.
I watched the trial every day in 1995 and I felt that he was guilty...but watching it now, I will say that I think Johnny Cochran could convince me of anything if I had been on that jury. He's very smooth and charming, just like O.J.
Christy Adams, the jury do get all of the evidence to take back into the Deliberation room all of the evidence that was put into evidence to see the facts without Cochran just have to help them along with the judge to be honest and follow the law
I watched it everyday and knew he wasn’t guilty after all the evidence was presented. I started thinking he could have possibly murdered them. Racist, corrupt L.A. PD was KNOWN for planting evidence to railroad innocent people and OJ would have been one of them if he didn’t have the money to hire the Dream Team
Yes she a suspect oh no they rush to judgement that is good comments the maid came after Nicole good thoughts maybe she got Rosa Lopez help her she was in rush go back her country
KingKongBrodie Johnson because she tried to stop Nicole from leaving after OJ had beat her up! I’d have punched her face in if it was me she was stopping from getting away.
Omg yes dude, i literally just watched that part a few minutes ago and it’s the same thing I was thinking. And Ito is a dick! He’s so petty. It seemed like he overruled the objection because he didn’t like Chris Darden or the other prosecutor guy. It seemed personal almost.
This trial is a good example why the lawyers bend the law in order to fit their own case. Mr Cochran has been disrupted by the opponents deliberately. Desperate excuses and bad for the justice. It is not the ignorant that I worry about; it is the supposedly educated individuals who bend, abuse and misuse the law like the ones who make excuses during the opening statement.
@@AxmedBahjad Worth checking out some clips of the prosecutor's dishonesty, repeated attempts to trample on the defendant's rights, and desperation to push a narrative that clearly doesn't align with reality.
I remember watching this opening back in ‘95 and was amazed that OJ’s attorneys were actually able to come up with a defense. Before the trial it seemed like there was a mountain of evidence against him that was indisputable. Johnny Cochran and Barry Scheck did an amazing job that I did not believe was possible. RIP Mr. Johnny.
It wasn't the dream team that acquitted him he was innocent all along and there wasn't enough evidence to even go to trial. The bad prosecution didn't help themselves neither
@@KeeshanCook-qm8mj Way too much for me to describe in this reply. If you are familiar with the case you know. People are convicted on one fingerprint or one drop of blood or mere circumstantial evidence. Never has there been a case with this much blood evidence and circumstantial evidence where the accused is found not guilty. It has never happened. The evidence was so great against OJ that his defense team could not challenge it directly so instead they focused on the investigation process and motives and race. They knew that was the only way to explain things like Goldman’s blood found in OJ’s Bronco, even though Goldman has never been inside OJ’s bronco.
👨⚖️🎥📺 @3:26 ~ Seems like a bad idea to mention on TV that one of the 12 jurors picture was momentarily released yesterday. A lot of people would have missed it but now they could’ve gone back by rewinding their VCR tapes to get a picture of one of the jurors. It would seem best to have this take place outside the public‘s view. Just explain it to the jury back in the jury room with a court reporter present if wanted, but don’t let everybody in the country and everybody in the news media know to go back and look for that jury members face. Not too smart, judge.
@@ItsBrittany. Nah I haven't watched all the videos, it's too much of a time investment for something I don't care THAT much about. I wasn't alive in 1995
Marcia Clark lying about what Ron Goldman was wearing was stupid. Now I will watch this whole trial and be skeptical of every word that comes out of her mouth! That was judt plain dumb of her!
I was 9 years old when this was happening. I would get mad cause it ruin my afternoon cartoons. But as an adult now, glad I can watch it. I would say again I did ruin my childhood cartoons dammit lol.
26:20 I'm really confused about this... Cochran uses his L hand but shows it making a R turn saying "the limo driver would take a left" and then he uses his R hand and puts it over to the L side and says "the bronco would be to the right." Did anyone else catch this? Thoughts? Opinions?
I think it's all Cochran's mind games, honestly. The more of the trial I've watched, the more sneaky shit i've seen him pull/put-on in front of Judge Ito and the jury.
Hes doing the directions from the jury's eyesight so when he points right with his hand and says he made a left turn to the jury's eyes he is pointing left.
I remember learning about this case in high school and my teacher talking about how great Johnny cochran was on this case.No matter what we think about the verdict, it doesn't affect the fact that Johnny cochran was a great lawyer
@@csea4672 it was though, like the comment about the "ugly mood" wich was literally rebuffed during opening statement. Not to mention the fact that it wasn't relevant. Like Cochran said, it was a murder case, not a domestic abuse case. If OJ had committed domestic abuse he should've been charged with that. You are innocent until proven guilty, so to accuse him of domestic abuse that he isn't and hasn't been charged with, in a murdercase, is simple character assasination.
I think if you watch Christopher Darden on the previous day you will see him villifying OJ Simpson during his daughters recital. He claims OJ was menacing angry and in a horrible mood and videotapes will show that not to be true.
Yes-It-Is!! The prosecution must convince the jury -WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE- beyond a reasonable doubt, not by making the jury dislike the accused. The accused DOES NOT HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING! Why do people forget, or ignore that- unless they are the one accused?
@@30000Carol In this land you need an unscrupulous lawyer to secure your rights, besides, that's his job. If I'd have to make it a racial thing to save my client, heck, I'd not hesitate a second.
Tom Plan he nearly started a riot. He was a wonderful civil rights lawyer, no doubt about it, but he did things outside of court that really did make LA steam, simmer. It had just gotten over the Rodney King riots, and he was inciting ANOTHER one. It was reckless and dangerous. But, as a defense lawyer, he was amazing. Totally unscrupulous in his defence of his clients.
People like to say the defense was being slick and they have character flaws but in all honesty during Johnnie Cochran‘s opening statement the people constantly interrupted him claiming his opening statement was argumentative at some point you have to let it go after the judge overruled your objections .
Yeah but it didn't do him no good. Cursed helping oj . I truly believe if he didn't take that case , he would be alive today . Only Jonny could got off oj.
RIP Mr Cochrane you were a true patriot of the Constitution and defending a persons rights that's he's innocent until they prove it beyond a reasonable doubt these days layers should watch a real lawyer defending a persons rights due process under the law
@@shirellediana yah man.. for some reason people think ethnic responses to extreme racism implies the addressing party is equally as racist as the proven racist..smh..to live in ignorance must truly be bliss..
There was an autopsy show on YT. I can't remember the name of it, but on the show, a medical examiner gets their files and explains his findings with their files. No drugs were found in Nicole or Ron's system. But the overall injuries were absolutely brutal, and he said this crime could have been done in minutes. The injuries a lot of them were fatal. Nicole had 3 stab wounds to her neck before the slashed throat. All 3 of those injuries to her neck would have been fatal. He said it also looked like she got stabbed in the head. Ron's was stabbed in the thigh, neck a few times, and left side of his abnominal twice going through his rib cage and hitting his lung. This would have also been fatal. He had what appears to be stab wounds on his hands as well. I think if u just look up Nicole Brown's final 24 or autopsy, u can find it.
@@ericabouchard8786 thank you for this information. I agree the crime could’ve been committed in minutes if a person is stabbed in the right places. Nicole was afraid of OJ so she wouldn’t have fought him. I think Ron arrived not long after she was killed and OJ couldn’t have left a witness. He was still strong for his age. He would’ve been in trouble had LAPD not botched the investigation.
@my.0224 yw. I wish I could remember the name of the show, but I watched it a few months ago on youtube. He explained that he thinks the head injury on nicole probably happened first. Then the individual stab wounds to her neck. Ron at that point entered the witness was heard a man yelling hey,hey,hey... the stab wound to Ron's thigh he believes happened first and it made Ron buckle and kind of get pushed into the small fenced in area he was found in while the assailant is still attacking Ron. When the person knew Ron was down he went back to Nicole and did the final slash to her throat. He explains it really well. Of course this was just his theory going off documents, photos etc
@@ericabouchard8786 I’ve always believed he was responsible. People didn’t understand his obsession with her which I think drove him to murder. I don’t think Ron was the intended target. He was at the right place at the wrong time.
Cochran was one of the bravest American man in the whole American history. He had the courage to represent the most hated African Americans in DEMOCRATIC AMERICA. Respect 🫡 RIP!!!
He gave Nicole’s family 50 yard line tickets at the Super Bowl. I’m pretty sure they’d much rather have Nicole alive, raising her kids and living a happy life. What a scum bag.
The defense just did their part the prosecution could have had a stronger team the guy didn’t even want to be they just picked him to be there and he messed up.... so many things happened where the jury couldn’t think straight and the actual facts were buried somewhere like the racist cop guy and he turned the whole case when he used his 5th amendment right to the question about planting evidence....
@@Amberstarrbanks He went home to change first before he brought glasses to Nicoles house. He had plans to go out after work with a coworker; Stewart Tanner. Ron Goldman left work with his uniform pants on; the black pants, and then changed into blue jeans at home before he brought glasses to Nicoles house. this was all covered in preliminary hearing. Ron lived within walking distance to Mezzaluna where he worked. Nicole lived around corner as well so it wasn't out of his way. He was going to go out to a club with Stewart Tanner but unfortunately he never made it out of Nicoles front yard!
@@audreyann1975 how does a waiter working at a ritzy restaurant in one of the richest neighborhoods in California just able to walk a few blocks to his apartment?!
Well I have to say my perception has evolved as my emotional attachment has dissolved. I’m not angry at either side or even taken sides as I had pretty early on when I watched this what ? a few decades ago. I find Johnny Cochran intellectually fascinating. I’m watching this amiable defense lawyer address a jury with such entertaining finesse.. he’s actually seducing them in the non sexual way and it’s his style and hard not to like him and to look forward to every word (he can get away with...) I remember in real time having an immediate dislike for the entire defense team, especially Shapiro and Cochran along with affection for Darden and Marcia Clark. Now I’m fond of all of them and empathize with a bunch of lawyers who were right at the very beginning of the enormous public interest in live trials that has followed ever since. But this was the raw beginning when possibly some less comfortable than others on national television. Johnny appears quite comfortable as he’s talking to the jury more than outlining a case. The pundits were brutal back then as well. Marcia Clark changed her hairstyle ( big deal ) but also the not so frivolous speculation on Chris Darden’s late entry into the state’s case. Common sense can presume he was carefully placed when the news was out about a vulgar racist cop who would be presenting damaging evidence... but that kind of speculation failed to consider he was also a talented impassioned attorney whose participation was as vital for these attributes as well as for making a prosecution table less white. Less linked with the racism they themselves brought into the case and onto the stand to testify ... which was their big mistake not the fault of the defense for using the info to discredit a damaging witnesses who handled (literally) too much physical evidence, too much with a record like his. . To put a known racist officer on the stand against these sharp brilliant lawyers was thoughtless or arrogant. No case is strong enough to weather that kind of intrusion. It had nothing to do with the race of the jurors. It had to do with the racism of one crucial witness mistakenly entrusted in handling crucial evidence that could have been either exculpatory or damaging (incriminating) and thus he was miscast for that role. A public servant who serves only some is no longer serving anyone especially when he carries a gun.
In being able to watch the preliminary hearing and the trial itself; gives a better understanding of what went wrong, with this trial. Right from the start the prosecustion team was trying to stop the defense from representing OJ with the same evidence that they had. Evidence still being collected during the actual trial. How could the prosecustion team not know that the police and certain witnesses where going to be a liability for the State. The opening statements are pretty much the result of the whole case that took almost a year and a half. Why was the State lying so much in this trial Ms Clark Dummy Darden and the police blew this case.
They actually did try to have that excluded bc him being a racist really is irrelevant to the murders but since he found the glove at ojs he had to testify. The judge should have said no. It turned into a nightmare in that courtroom and with the judge setting the tone for the court, he made everyone favor the defense with his behavior
They did know and they were scared to death because they were assigned the case and Mr.Cochran dug out all the dirt and threw it in their face. The police AND the prosecution blew this case.
The answer to your question is not one of the prosecutors had any Common Sense !!! And a Rush to Accuse Mr. Orenthal James Simpson at all Cost, and the it backed 🔥. The good Lord sit's hi and look low.. No Weapons formed against #Oj Shall Prosper..
The eye witnesses the police threw away and timeline issues were always a problem. Once we realize Ron Goldman died around 10:35 and Park saw bags and OJ standing on the edge of the driveway at 10:52...you understand why there are us who seek alternative answers and know who Bret Cantor is.
Every time the prosecution objects, it makes them look bad. Plus that one dumb ass wanted a side bar. Like that song goes, Go Johnny go, Johnny be Cochran......
Rewatching from the beginning and completely stunned by Ito’s rulings. When I watched this live years ago, I was young and not really understanding what was going on. Watching now, I’m shocked at what Ito overruled as far as prosecution objections. Crazy.
Its amazing now after you read the book If I did it and watch OJ the lost confession, then put parts of the trial together with that, I think there were drug guys over at Nicoles around 10:00 wanted drug money that she didn't have, then Charlie Ehrlich wnt to OJs around 10:10 to tell him he needs the money owed, thats what made OJ snap and go to Nicole's, he went to scream at curse at her because of the drug debt, then Ron Goldman showed up, thats why the murders happened, he thought Ron was delivering drugs and OJ didn't want it around his kids, so he snapped, he and Charlie Ehrlich killed Ron then OJ had to kill Nocole because Ron was killed, OJ stipped his clothes down to his cocks and boxers, they left and got back to Bristol street, OJ went through his neighbor's and his tennis courts to the back of his house hit on the wall to get kato, kato tried to distract the limo driver, oj got back in his house and showered, putting the towel and hos boxers in one of his bags to get rid of anymore blood evidence, they leave in the limo then Charles Ehrlich pulls the bronco back to Rockingham and leaves in his car, the rest is history
It doesn't explain that the blood samples weren't" there until July 3 The evidence gathered at the crime scene by criminal investigator Dennis Fung doesn't add up. The drug money is correct An original argument has them arguing that a drug dealer with 3 unidentified women, were partying with Nicole Simpson O. J. Simpson" s 911 call 7 unidentified 911 calls doesn't indicate that they were only made by Brown Meza Luna being a drop off point for cocaine distribution, connects Brown to Goldman, with the possibility of Goldman being an informant . The wrong place at the wrong time, Doesn't add up No one gave a damn that he was there because he knew too much
@@lynndragoman1573 I'm talking about THIS case with THESE specific jurors. Don't get yo panties in a bunch. You know this is the truth. Stevie Wonder can see OJ was guilty.
@@lynndragoman1573 I understand...certain ppl in society are not intelligent enough to discern what "reasonable" means...it takes a little intelligence and you have to deprogram all that Al Sharpton brainwashing...LOL!
A jury in Santa Monica would've had a better chance of rendering OJ a guilty verdict. It was the jurisdiction where the crime happened. They only moved it to Downtown LA because they wanted to accomodate the intense media coverage.
Say it with me: 'the jury that acquitted O J Simpson was comprised of blacks, whites, and hispanics, and the verdict was unanimous '. Are you saying that there are more people in other areas who believe the police never cheat, never plant evidence, never abuse, never frame people of color? Does that make them racist? Or naive? Or indifferent? Or just unintelligent? Or all of the above?
The film is so funny to me. I enjoyed watching it. The whole team seem like it was a game to win. Whenever things go their way they shaking hands laughing . The movie was a joy to watch. The People vs OJ Simpson. Must See! 😊 All the characters looks so much like the real.. Except Cuba, why him.? RIParad🌴e Johnnie 😘💖
What a ridiculous jump to imply that a drug cartel is in the business of sending 4 man hit squads to kill their rich customers.... all of the defenses plots should have been discredited by the prosecution.
Agreed. Since when do cartels supply directly to users to start with? There are typically about 4 middle men between the cartel and the street level user.
Johnnie was so prepared tho. The film showed how he rearranged OJ home with his family pics , got rid of the old ones he had. He did it all for OJ. Real Lawyer, at heart for him. 💕 That's love..
@@DingaDee the other lawyers (Shapiro, kardashian, etc) were also getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars but they didn’t put in the effort that Cochran did. Cochran did the extra mile
@@mstineyjones422 Yeah he knew OJ had abandoned the black community once he got famous and knew the jury wouldn’t like that. So he had to “black his house up”
Thank you for uploading all these! What a fascinating trial!
Regardless of what I think of the verdict. now that I rewatch this 20 plus years later, Johnny Cochran was a damn good attorney!!!
He was a wife abuser. He had a secret wife and kids. He wasn't a good lawyer. He was good at preaching and lying to get people like him to not pass judgment on O.j. He was a con artist and he died of a brain tumor.
He was brilliant.
Absolutely💯
He was the GOAT
His story crafting was excellent. To convince a jury you have to be able to tell a story. It keeps the jury’s attention span.
can you imagine if Johnnie Cochran was the District Attorney and Darden was O.J.'s attorney. I would be willing to bet that he would have been found guilty.
FACTS
EDDY- YUP.
no shit lol
Johnnnie Cochran played an integral role in the defense but you can’t discount what Alan, Barry and F Lee Bailey did for the case. IMO, with out any of those 4 lawyers, OJ would’ve been found guilty
@@FlexSZN23 -Read 'Legacy of Deception',published before the verdict.It laid out the ground work for OJs' acquittal.
What happened to the sound at about 13:00 into the video
.Johnny Cochran gave a masterful closing argument. If you can make sure you listen to it. He gave a masterclass performance
Based Off Facts 💯👑
What is the dude on far left saying/motioning to? at 54:06 it's someone past prosecutors, is it at the clerk? defense guy putting up exhibits?
Injustice anywhere is a threat of justice everywhere
The irony
Just started watching this case. Taking a break from Jody arias case. How many days does this case go on for?
Preliminary June 30, 1994- July 8, 1994
Trial January 24th 1995- October 3rd 1995 .
Days?? 😂😂 months!
Within the first couple of minutes Cochran cites Martin Luther King and Abe Lincoln…talk about laying it on thick😂
One of the BEST to EVER Do It. RIP Mr. Cochran. Gone But NEVER Forgotten!!
Go Johnnie Go !!! If it doesnt fit ,,,, you must aquit !!!!!!Simply the best , and better than all the rest !
Johnnie Cochran was the GOAT defense Attorneys
How come the audio tends to go out at certain times?
I know how this whole thing plays out and it was 30 years ago, but Ito is still PISSING ME OFF! 😂
I think he was talking about Marcus Allen as the person being with Nicole and then getting married at O.J Simpson’s estate
Great combo. Johnny-smooth and charismatic. Perfect for speaking directly to the jury in Opening and Closing Statements. Bailey-cut-throat with ability to recall and destroy witnesses on the stand. Shapiro - calm presence and can take on any role but chose the leadership role. Just perfect for this particular case but I’m sure they are all good in their own right.
Shapiro ended up losing a lot of control over his leadership in the trial as it progressed. Caused a real rift, but it obviously wasn’t detrimental.
No. Only Bailey was really suited to Simpson's defense.
@@wet-read true. He was the heavy hitter of that team.
It was the Dream Team & Johnnie Cochran was Jordan
@@wet-readHe was Magic Johnson on the Dream Team defense, Shapiro was Barkley, Ullman was Bird, Dershowitz was Ewing
So... the poor jury. The length of this trial alone would have literally killed me!😱
The jury doesn't deserve pity. They deserve condemnation. They should be embarrassed and ashamed.
The Manson trial was a year also in 71
@@slyjokergThey should be ashamed for correctly ruling that there was NOT proof beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT that OJ committed the murders? Just admit you are a fanatic who never cared about the truth
I think that was the prosecutions big mistake…know the audience. Too long, too much science etc. I don’t think OJ would have won with Shipario. He was not relatable…but Cochran was a master. I still know OJ did it! He’s gone now 🔥
Who the hell named these files? Could you have made it any more difficult to track chronologically?
You simply type into the search function O J Simpson trial chronological order and you can then hit autoplay and watch it nonstop. There are 493 videos.
I think its labeled perfectly. Its Part 1-2-3 etc, of whatever day its on.
What happened to the sound 😕
12:45 "You're lips move but I can't hear what you're saying." -- David Gilmore (Pink Floyd, Comfortably Numb, The Wall)
"you're talking alot, but you're not saying anything" - psycho killer by talking heads
man the prosecution was completely OUTLAWYERED! notice how the prosecution was glued more to their papers than the defense. For a good opening or speaker in general, you can't be glued to the paper in front of you.
Yah, writing down all of Cochrane’s flagrant violations!
Yeah they were our layered. Especially since the state has way more $$$ than the defendant.
Watching the prosecution opening defense Cochran and his team were calm and silent listening to the opening statement. When it was Cochran turn for his opening statement and downplaying the prosecution with his smooth communicated evidences, the prosecution were shifting in their seats, interrupting Cochran for the judge to intervene, and staring with the we fucked up look 😅
Good points
Bc he was talking out of his ass the entire Time. That’s why, what do you mean lol
At :12 what did those arm gestures mean...? Looked like he was making an X
Damn.... Johnnie Cochran was Good !!
Yes..but Bob Shapiro was the hidden genius. He was one to make it about race.
@@jasonpeters9865 F Lee ruined the Gov't case,destroyed Fhurman.
O ye
The trial is just now starting and the state is clearly and already shaking in their boots. The state feared J.C big time .
That audio getting on my nerves going in and out
It's hilarious seeing how disgraceful the audio/video was- in the last few hearings of kohberger (June-Aug 2023) COMPARED to a trial from 1995. Yeah, weird.... 1995's audio/visual is a billion times better than in 2023?? Hmm. 🤔🙄 Just listen & watch how clear, crisp, actually- compared to. It really makes you wonder, like you'd have to try hard to make it as bad as it is in Idaho trials.
the actor who played cochran in American Crime Story, the resemblance between both is uncanny. absolutely incredible casting. not just that, but the entire ensemble was perfectly cast.
Cuba Gooding Jrvwas the worst OJ ever 😂😂😂😂
"UNCUT" my ass.
Here's what missing when Johnny Cochran is cut from approx. 12;45 up to and including 13:11. Here is what Mr. Cochran says during the dubbed portion of this "Uncut" OJ trial:
..."THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW THAT THE PROSECUTION IN THIS CASE HAS ENLISTED THE SERVICES OF MANY, MANY POLICE AGENCIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES, THE FBI, MANY LOCAL POLICE AGENCIES. THEY HAVE GONE AROUND THE WORLD TALKING TO WITNESSES. BUT THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW THEY FAILED TO GO NEXT DOOR TO MR. SIMPSON'S HOUSE AND TALK TO A WITNESS THAT THEY KNEW ABOUT WHO PROVIDED HIM WITH AN ALIBI, AND THERE ARE OTHER WITNESSES LIKE THAT AND WE WILL HAVE TO ONLY ASK OURSELVES WHY.... "
Johnny's statement is 100x as well thought out, fluid and powerful as the prosecution. he's 100x the lawyer they were. it didnt matter if OJ was guilty - 100 million people were treated into one of the great mind's of the 20th century. Johnny Cochran RIP
a shameless huckster who sprang a double murderer. he can rot.
He can't even pronounce the word "picture" properly. He says "pitcher" and it makes him sound uneducated. He was a liar who would say anything to get his client acquitted. No ethics or integrity at all.
Vicki Serocki--The timecard for Ron at the Prelim.hearing showed he punched out at 10.30.
White People treated blacka horribly for more then one hundred years. Pay back came back
@@miguelenriquez3309 -There were no payback,the jurors were simply brilliant.
If you followed the trial without the media influence as I did during 1995 but I have watched just straight court room here and I understand how the jury voted not guilty... I’m not stating I don’t think he did it but the prosecution made many many mistakes..The burden is on the people..The so called dream team created more than enough reasonable doubt..The Law is very clear..you can’t find someone guilty just because you think he did it..The prosecution were just out lawyered..and Fung was a disaster for the prosecution..and that’s where collecting the evidence began..
Right
Jury had other choice but ,,not guilty
Jill Love what you said!
There was very good reasons to vote not guilty. Reasonable doubt was established by the defense
i think the biggest flaw of the prosecution was though focused too long on his history with domestic violence and i think they lost the jury with that
You will see during closing how Darden tells the jury to go back to the opening argument where the defense promised you will see all of this evidence. Where was that evidence, it never materialized. Then Cochran gets up and says the defense doesn’t have the burden of proof. We can sit there and do nothing if we so choose. Darden made a great point, although Cochran was right, but who would remember 11 months ago?
🤯🤯 ~ I’ve heard more info than I ever knew before. I thought OJ was guilty all of my life, this new information is quite compelling to show that maybe he is not guilty. I know the trial is just starting, but I had to mention this. But for normal humans it’s difficult to change your mind when you have believe something your entire life, no matter how much evidence is thrown at you. I do think I’m better and having the ability to be self reflective, but that doesn’t mean I’m immune to emotional feelings. I recognize my emotions and why I’m having them more than I think the average person does, but I’m not immune.
Guilty, if you think otherwise, you are very smart at nothing
You obviously don’t understand how science and DNA work 😂
@@annasrobloxchannel3816 the defense never tested the dna evidence. The prosecutions lab made a mistake on the report and the defense exploited that calling to question the reliability of the evidence. Smart of the defense but it doesn’t make Simpson less guilty, just the beneficiary of a good defensive strategy. The defense has the benefit of not having the burden of proving anything. All the defense needs to do is create doubt and attack every bit of evidence that points to Simpson’s guilt.
Simpson is just as guilty today as he was in 1994. It is sad that he got away with a double homicide, and I feel for Ron and Nicole’s families.
😅. Go read another comic book
I watched the trial every day in 1995 and I felt that he was guilty...but watching it now, I will say that I think Johnny Cochran could convince me of anything if I had been on that jury. He's very smooth and charming, just like O.J.
Christy Adams, the jury do get all of the evidence to take back into the Deliberation room all of the evidence that was put into evidence to see the facts without Cochran just have to help them along with the judge to be honest and follow the law
I watched it everyday and knew he wasn’t guilty after all the evidence was presented. I started thinking he could have possibly murdered them. Racist, corrupt L.A. PD was KNOWN for planting evidence to railroad innocent people and OJ would have been one of them if he didn’t have the money to hire the Dream Team
He brings up enoughresonable doubt it is hard to convict, that is for sure.
@@moniquewatkins9952 the time period.. rodney king, serious racial tensions ans the 92 riots are a huge factor to consider also.
You think so?? I think he comes off incredibly fake and desperate. But I’m a prosecutor 🤷🏼♀️
Why wasn't the 4 suspicious men running fron the scene not mentioned in closing arguments?
Because there were no “4 suspicious men running from the scene”
Bc it was complete bullshit. Wake up Jesus 😂😂
So nobody mentioned the fact oj wife attacked the housekeeping lady 😒
Yes she a suspect oh no they rush to judgement that is good comments the maid came after Nicole good thoughts maybe she got Rosa Lopez help her she was in rush go back her country
KingKongBrodie Johnson because she tried to stop Nicole from leaving after OJ had beat her up! I’d have punched her face in if it was me she was stopping from getting away.
KingKongBrodie Johnson why do you think the defense didn’t raise it? Because it would confirm OJ had yet again beaten her up.
BS! That's a lie.
@@timdebaney7167 - LOL
cannot believe the prosecutions objection at 38min was overruled....
Omg yes dude, i literally just watched that part a few minutes ago and it’s the same thing I was thinking. And Ito is a dick! He’s so petty. It seemed like he overruled the objection because he didn’t like Chris Darden or the other prosecutor guy. It seemed personal almost.
Are you a judge or a TH-cam judge?
Why does the one officer get a shield? Is that bulletproof?
virginiaishere00 - it’s a sound barrier
That opening statement was so good. Shit.
Masterful. Cochrane was truly mesmerizing.
what audio was deleted at around 13:20? Why?
He broke into song singing "im sexy and you know it". No one needs to hear that
I think it was redacted
There is not deleted audio at that timestamp. What are you talking about?
This trial is a good example why the lawyers bend the law in order to fit their own case. Mr Cochran has been disrupted by the opponents deliberately. Desperate excuses and bad for the justice.
It is not the ignorant that I worry about; it is the supposedly educated individuals who bend, abuse and misuse the law like the ones who make excuses during the opening statement.
The prosecution bends the laws too
@@ronniegatling4355 can you elaborate on that?
@@AxmedBahjad Have you been watching the Rittenhouse trial? There's a great example.
@@MrHazyDayz No, I have not.
@@AxmedBahjad Worth checking out some clips of the prosecutor's dishonesty, repeated attempts to trample on the defendant's rights, and desperation to push a narrative that clearly doesn't align with reality.
28:16 He received a Nobel prize in Chemistry, not Peace (which makes a lot more sense).
I remember watching this opening back in ‘95 and was amazed that OJ’s attorneys were actually able to come up with a defense. Before the trial it seemed like there was a mountain of evidence against him that was indisputable. Johnny Cochran and Barry Scheck did an amazing job that I did not believe was possible. RIP Mr. Johnny.
It wasn't the dream team that acquitted him he was innocent all along and there wasn't enough evidence to even go to trial. The bad prosecution didn't help themselves neither
@@chrisspearline767 Huh? There was more evidence to go to trial against OJ than in 99.99% of all murder cases.
Mainstream media won’t tell you that the jurors voted against an indictment because there was no evidence.
What is this "mountain of evidence " that you speak of?
@@KeeshanCook-qm8mj Way too much for me to describe in this reply. If you are familiar with the case you know. People are convicted on one fingerprint or one drop of blood or mere circumstantial evidence. Never has there been a case with this much blood evidence and circumstantial evidence where the accused is found not guilty. It has never happened. The evidence was so great against OJ that his defense team could not challenge it directly so instead they focused on the investigation process and motives and race. They knew that was the only way to explain things like Goldman’s blood found in OJ’s Bronco, even though Goldman has never been inside OJ’s bronco.
👨⚖️🎥📺 @3:26 ~ Seems like a bad idea to mention on TV that one of the 12 jurors picture was momentarily released yesterday. A lot of people would have missed it but now they could’ve gone back by rewinding their VCR tapes to get a picture of one of the jurors. It would seem best to have this take place outside the public‘s view. Just explain it to the jury back in the jury room with a court reporter present if wanted, but don’t let everybody in the country and everybody in the news media know to go back and look for that jury members face. Not too smart, judge.
The title of the video is misspelled.
Whats wrong with it? Its Part 1 of the new day
@@ItsBrittany. It says "OJ Simson" instead of OJ Simpson. His name is missing the letter P
@@salj.5459 oh snap!! Wow lol the eyes can be misleading, thats for the correction! Did you watch all the videos? Or watch live when it happened?
@@ItsBrittany. Nah I haven't watched all the videos, it's too much of a time investment for something I don't care THAT much about. I wasn't alive in 1995
@@salj.5459 haha true! Im slowly making my way but i only watch the defense parts! Its like watching a movie
I was living in so. Call. The address on Bundy drive has since been changed
Smooth as silk does not begin to describe this legend who will never die. What a lawyer. What a legend.
I was too young to watch this at the time, but to hear Cochran try to explain OJ's abusive, stalking behavior as benevolent is actually hilarious
The title has Simpson's name spelled as Simson
@ClassicBob100 - good catch!
Well spotted 🙂
I noticed that as well
Marcia Clark lying about what Ron Goldman was wearing was stupid. Now I will watch this whole trial and be skeptical of every word that comes out of her mouth! That was judt plain dumb of her!
The actor's voice is similar as Darden's
I was 9 years old when this was happening. I would get mad cause it ruin my afternoon cartoons. But as an adult now, glad I can watch it. I would say again I did ruin my childhood cartoons dammit lol.
Cochron tore it down.
FACTS 💯
10:20 wtf was that all about
He is a good lawyer but I do not buy anything he says.DNA evidence is strong.
Johnny Cochran keeps digging at Christopher Darden.😂😂
26:20
I'm really confused about this... Cochran uses his L hand but shows it making a R turn saying "the limo driver would take a left" and then he uses his R hand and puts it over to the L side and says "the bronco would be to the right."
Did anyone else catch this? Thoughts? Opinions?
Might be due to camera mirroring effect
I think it's all Cochran's mind games, honestly. The more of the trial I've watched, the more sneaky shit i've seen him pull/put-on in front of Judge Ito and the jury.
@@AliceNsWonderland agreed
Hes doing the directions from the jury's eyesight so when he points right with his hand and says he made a left turn to the jury's eyes he is pointing left.
@@AliceNsWonderland- Tell me about the glove not fitting.
Johnny Cochrane will go down in the history book as the greatest attorney of all time rest in peace 🙏
At 1:23:44 😂😅😂😆 judge Ito said Sit your butt down!! Lol
I remember learning about this case in high school and my teacher talking about how great Johnny cochran was on this case.No matter what we think about the verdict, it doesn't affect the fact that Johnny cochran was a great lawyer
So the defense can bring up his character if it's pleasant, but if prosecution does and it's negative, then it's character assassination?
no, its charecter assasination, because its lies.
@@tobak952 but it wasn't lies...
@@csea4672 it was though, like the comment about the "ugly mood" wich was literally rebuffed during opening statement. Not to mention the fact that it wasn't relevant. Like Cochran said, it was a murder case, not a domestic abuse case. If OJ had committed domestic abuse he should've been charged with that. You are innocent until proven guilty, so to accuse him of domestic abuse that he isn't and hasn't been charged with, in a murdercase, is simple character assasination.
I think if you watch Christopher Darden on the previous day you will see him villifying OJ Simpson during his daughters recital. He claims OJ was menacing angry and in a horrible mood and videotapes will show that not to be true.
Yes-It-Is!!
The prosecution must convince the jury -WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE- beyond a reasonable doubt, not by making the jury dislike the accused.
The accused DOES NOT HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING!
Why do people forget, or ignore that- unless they are the one accused?
Where's the transcript to this compelling performance? 😂
Conclusion... stay by the microphone. Don't stray.
500 000 $ No strings attached *big smiley*
He's not jealous? Defense is not good at bringing it out... It's a stutter...
the defence attorney is very articulate
But totally unscrupulous. He turned this into a racial issue, ignoring the facts and the evidence.
@@30000Carol In this land you need an unscrupulous lawyer to secure your rights, besides, that's his job. If I'd have to make it a racial thing to save my client, heck, I'd not hesitate a second.
Tom Plan exactly 👌🏽
Tom Plan he nearly started a riot. He was a wonderful civil rights lawyer, no doubt about it, but he did things outside of court that really did make LA steam, simmer. It had just gotten over the Rodney King riots, and he was inciting ANOTHER one. It was reckless and dangerous. But, as a defense lawyer, he was amazing. Totally unscrupulous in his defence of his clients.
Cochran is a beast. Halfway during the opening I was sure Oj was innocent. I had already made my mind up before the trial. Damn he’s good.
People like to say the defense was being slick and they have character flaws but in all honesty during Johnnie Cochran‘s opening statement the people constantly interrupted him claiming his opening statement was argumentative at some point you have to let it go after the judge overruled your objections .
Johnny was soo good
Yeah but it didn't do him no good. Cursed helping oj . I truly believe if he didn't take that case , he would be alive today . Only Jonny could got off oj.
He helped a guilty man get off of a brutal murder and than the grim reaper came early for him and he lost his life 💯🤷♀️
@@annasrobloxchannel3816 I don’t believe getting oj off caused him to die smart one
@@annasrobloxchannel3816 amen
@@annasrobloxchannel3816No, they assassinated him because he was planning to investigate how much America owed Blacks for reparations
look at Darden holding his head like that while Cochrane talks... Thats the face of a lawyer with no case
FACTS ‼️
No, that's the look of a lawyer who has to listen to a bullshit story.
@@johnp82 no... bullshit stories would make you look annoyed or amused, not dismayed. Also.. bullshit stories don't win trials
@@tobak952 Darden ain't gonna laugh every time Cochrane said something rediculous, otherwise he'd be laughing every 8 minutes.
@@johnp82 you can look amused without laughing, Darden looks despaired, and rightly so. He had no case and Cochrane knew
RIP Mr Cochrane you were a true patriot of the Constitution and defending a persons rights that's he's innocent until they prove it beyond a reasonable doubt these days layers should watch a real lawyer defending a persons rights due process under the law
do not get his haters. he just did his job, the DA was full of idiots
He did fight for people's rights, but he was just as racist as the cop's he was fighting against.
@deed,e6785, where in the hell you get JC was Racist, 🧐 Oh you wanted a response, now you have one
@@shirellediana yah man.. for some reason people think ethnic responses to extreme racism implies the addressing party is equally as racist as the proven racist..smh..to live in ignorance must truly be bliss..
RIP Cochrane, you sir did a great job I'm 100% shore oj didnt do it.
Why do you all think the first witness was never heard of?
Is that Dordan's hand on his head? 27:32
Yeah, why?
Cochran refers to the State's argumentative statements as evidence. Very slick of him.
That guy is very intelligent
Wonder what the results of Nicole and Ron’s autopsies show.
There was an autopsy show on YT. I can't remember the name of it, but on the show, a medical examiner gets their files and explains his findings with their files. No drugs were found in Nicole or Ron's system. But the overall injuries were absolutely brutal, and he said this crime could have been done in minutes. The injuries a lot of them were fatal. Nicole had 3 stab wounds to her neck before the slashed throat. All 3 of those injuries to her neck would have been fatal. He said it also looked like she got stabbed in the head. Ron's was stabbed in the thigh, neck a few times, and left side of his abnominal twice going through his rib cage and hitting his lung. This would have also been fatal. He had what appears to be stab wounds on his hands as well. I think if u just look up Nicole Brown's final 24 or autopsy, u can find it.
@@ericabouchard8786 thank you for this information. I agree the crime could’ve been committed in minutes if a person is stabbed in the right places. Nicole was afraid of OJ so she wouldn’t have fought him. I think Ron arrived not long after she was killed and OJ couldn’t have left a witness. He was still strong for his age. He would’ve been in trouble had LAPD not botched the investigation.
@my.0224 yw. I wish I could remember the name of the show, but I watched it a few months ago on youtube. He explained that he thinks the head injury on nicole probably happened first. Then the individual stab wounds to her neck. Ron at that point entered the witness was heard a man yelling hey,hey,hey... the stab wound to Ron's thigh he believes happened first and it made Ron buckle and kind of get pushed into the small fenced in area he was found in while the assailant is still attacking Ron. When the person knew Ron was down he went back to Nicole and did the final slash to her throat. He explains it really well. Of course this was just his theory going off documents, photos etc
@@ericabouchard8786 I’ve always believed he was responsible. People didn’t understand his obsession with her which I think drove him to murder. I don’t think Ron was the intended target. He was at the right place at the wrong time.
@@my.0224Nicole and Ron both had lots of defensive wounds on their hands and arms...they both fought back
Cochran was one of the bravest American man in the
whole American history. He had the courage to represent the most hated African Americans in DEMOCRATIC AMERICA. Respect 🫡 RIP!!!
He gave Nicole’s family 50 yard line tickets at the Super Bowl. I’m pretty sure they’d much rather have Nicole alive, raising her kids and living a happy life. What a scum bag.
The defense just did their part the prosecution could have had a stronger team the guy didn’t even want to be they just picked him to be there and he messed up.... so many things happened where the jury couldn’t think straight and the actual facts were buried somewhere like the racist cop guy and he turned the whole case when he used his 5th amendment right to the question about planting evidence....
It's Altamash--The actual facts are there's EDTA in the blood.look up Bettina Rasmussen testimony,then the crime scene photos.
I picked up on fact goldman wasn't dressed as stated , in pic 🤔
lisa thomas me too I thought he was supposed to be in black pants not denim jeans
@@Amberstarrbanks He went home to change first before he brought glasses to Nicoles house. He had plans to go out after work with a coworker; Stewart Tanner. Ron Goldman left work with his uniform pants on; the black pants, and then changed into blue jeans at home before he brought glasses to Nicoles house. this was all covered in preliminary hearing. Ron lived within walking distance to Mezzaluna where he worked. Nicole lived around corner as well so it wasn't out of his way. He was going to go out to a club with Stewart Tanner but unfortunately he never made it out of Nicoles front yard!
@@audreyann1975 how does a waiter working at a ritzy restaurant in one of the richest neighborhoods in California just able to walk a few blocks to his apartment?!
@@audreyann1975 -He didn't have the glass's.
@@philipwilliams1754 Yes, he most certainly did! They were found with the bodies in an envelope marked 'Nicoles glasses!'
Cochran was off by 7 months when he thought April95 would be verdict time.
Well I have to say my perception has evolved as my emotional attachment has dissolved. I’m not angry at either side or even taken sides as I had pretty early on when I watched this what ? a few decades ago. I find Johnny Cochran intellectually fascinating. I’m watching this amiable defense lawyer address a jury with such entertaining finesse.. he’s actually seducing them in the non sexual way and it’s his style and hard not to like him and to look forward to every word (he can get away with...) I remember in real time having an immediate dislike for the entire defense team, especially Shapiro and Cochran along with affection for Darden and Marcia Clark. Now I’m fond of all of them and empathize with a bunch of lawyers who were right at the very beginning of the enormous public interest in live trials that has followed ever since. But this was the raw beginning when possibly some less comfortable than others on national television. Johnny appears quite comfortable as he’s talking to the jury more than outlining a case. The pundits were brutal back then as well. Marcia Clark changed her hairstyle ( big deal ) but also the not so frivolous speculation on Chris Darden’s late entry into the state’s case. Common sense can presume he was carefully placed when the news was out about a vulgar racist cop who would be presenting damaging evidence... but that kind of speculation failed to consider he was also a talented impassioned attorney whose participation was as vital for these attributes as well as for making a prosecution table less white. Less linked with the racism they themselves brought into the case and onto the stand to testify ... which was their big mistake not the fault of the defense for using the info to discredit a damaging witnesses who handled (literally) too much physical evidence, too much with a record like his. . To put a known racist officer on the stand against these sharp brilliant lawyers was thoughtless or arrogant. No case is strong enough to weather that kind of intrusion. It had nothing to do with the race of the jurors. It had to do with the racism of one crucial witness mistakenly entrusted in handling crucial evidence that could have been either exculpatory or damaging (incriminating)
and thus he was miscast for that role.
A public servant who serves only some is no longer serving anyone especially when he carries a gun.
I have always said, if OJ would have done that, that Ford Bronco would have been a BLOODY MESS!
Exactly it was planted he didn't have enough time to clean all that up
Correct
He changed clothes at the scene obviously had a bag with him
Humm.. so where exactly did he change clothes? Outside in all the blood or inside the house where not a single blood drop was found???🤦♂️🤣
@@Mada-yq5sfhe put his clothes in a bag also the weapon. Did he hose himself down like pulp fiction?
Seeing OJ look at Johnnie cockran at the stand, is like him looking on for Salvation😃
In being able to watch the preliminary hearing and the trial itself; gives a better understanding of what went wrong, with this trial. Right from the start the prosecustion team was trying to stop the defense from representing OJ with the same evidence that they had. Evidence still being collected during the actual trial. How could the prosecustion team not know that the police and certain witnesses where going to be a liability for the State. The opening statements are pretty much the result of the whole case that took almost a year and a half.
Why was the State lying so much in this trial Ms Clark Dummy Darden and the police blew this case.
They actually did try to have that excluded bc him being a racist really is irrelevant to the murders but since he found the glove at ojs he had to testify. The judge should have said no. It turned into a nightmare in that courtroom and with the judge setting the tone for the court, he made everyone favor the defense with his behavior
They did know and they were scared to death because they were assigned the case and Mr.Cochran dug out all the dirt and threw it in their face. The police AND the prosecution blew this case.
@@sherilynnpontillo7936 Yup
The answer to your question is not one of the prosecutors had any Common Sense !!!
And a Rush to Accuse
Mr. Orenthal James Simpson at all Cost, and the it backed 🔥.
The good Lord sit's hi and look low.. No Weapons formed against #Oj Shall Prosper..
😀😀😀🙄
14:40 Hears mark fuhrman 22:48 Couple walking by 1:25:27 Tom Lang
Looks like its the entire cast of the people vs OJ. Except swap Cooba for OJ
17:12
Case won in the next 60 seconds
The eye witnesses the police threw away and timeline issues were always a problem. Once we realize Ron Goldman died around 10:35 and Park saw bags and OJ standing on the edge of the driveway at 10:52...you understand why there are us who seek alternative answers and know who Bret Cantor is.
lol @ 52:37 Can't even get it right who simpson was talking to.
09rja-Read the grand jury transcript,you will see there's a lull in the testimony for a few seconds.Then someone says ,call your next witness.
He was actually thinking about Dr Reider's and the EDTA
@@lynndragoman1573 Come again? That doesn't make any sense.
Johnnie Be Good, OJ Be Bad
You must remember she had an affair with a married man with child and didn't care he was married what goes around comes around!
Cochran could barely mention Goldman family.
Every time the prosecution objects, it makes them look bad. Plus that one dumb ass wanted a side bar. Like that song goes, Go Johnny go, Johnny be Cochran......
Rewatching from the beginning and completely stunned by Ito’s rulings. When I watched this live years ago, I was young and not really understanding what was going on. Watching now, I’m shocked at what Ito overruled as far as prosecution objections. Crazy.
Prosecution objections have been super dumb so far. Even i know it's gonna be over-ruled before it happens.
He was a horrible judge
Didn’t ITO used to work for Cochran?
(1:18:42) *Interesting point!!*
Most everything this guy said was a diversion and had nothing to do with anything and I don’t know how Ito put up with that
Its amazing now after you read the book If I did it and watch OJ the lost confession, then put parts of the trial together with that, I think there were drug guys over at Nicoles around 10:00 wanted drug money that she didn't have, then Charlie Ehrlich wnt to OJs around 10:10 to tell him he needs the money owed, thats what made OJ snap and go to Nicole's, he went to scream at curse at her because of the drug debt, then Ron Goldman showed up, thats why the murders happened, he thought Ron was delivering drugs and OJ didn't want it around his kids, so he snapped, he and Charlie Ehrlich killed Ron then OJ had to kill Nocole because Ron was killed, OJ stipped his clothes down to his cocks and boxers, they left and got back to Bristol street, OJ went through his neighbor's and his tennis courts to the back of his house hit on the wall to get kato, kato tried to distract the limo driver, oj got back in his house and showered, putting the towel and hos boxers in one of his bags to get rid of anymore blood evidence, they leave in the limo then Charles Ehrlich pulls the bronco back to Rockingham and leaves in his car, the rest is history
It doesn't explain that the blood samples weren't" there until July 3
The evidence gathered at the crime scene by criminal investigator Dennis Fung doesn't add up.
The drug money is correct
An original argument has them arguing that a drug dealer with 3 unidentified women, were partying with Nicole Simpson
O. J. Simpson" s 911 call 7 unidentified 911 calls doesn't indicate that they were only made by Brown
Meza Luna being a drop off point for cocaine distribution, connects Brown to Goldman, with the possibility of Goldman being an informant .
The wrong place at the wrong time,
Doesn't add up
No one gave a damn that he was there
because he knew too much
Nice phantasy going on here 😂😂😂
There's no positive identification of Charlie Ehlich
It's leaving out an alleged suspect that's needed to complete your theory
Did Johnny Choran tell Darden to set down some where2:19. And the scar on His middle finger his gonna link it up lolo😂😂😂
Pretty pathetic that black jurors would rather let a double murderer get away just because he is black! LOL!!!
1. OJ is innocent.
2. You must not know the history of white jurors.
So black jurors never convict other blacks?
@@lynndragoman1573 I'm talking about THIS case with THESE specific jurors. Don't get yo panties in a bunch. You know this is the truth. Stevie Wonder can see OJ was guilty.
@@rasalghul9331 Stevie Wonder can see reasonable doubt
@@lynndragoman1573 I understand...certain ppl in society are not intelligent enough to discern what "reasonable" means...it takes a little intelligence and you have to deprogram all that Al Sharpton brainwashing...LOL!
Also, re dardens opening , stating brown never had a job, untrue! Oj met her on her job as a waitress!😒
Vlad just wanted to naked off her clothes and impale her bro. :^P
I think he was referring to a job during her relationship with him and during their marriage.
@@audreyann1975 yes...that's what it was
@@audreyann1975 exactly, he said "in her adult life..."
she worked as a waitress for 2 weeks.
A jury in Santa Monica would've had a better chance of rendering OJ a guilty verdict. It was the jurisdiction where the crime happened. They only moved it to Downtown LA because they wanted to accomodate the intense media coverage.
If the trial was at Santa Monica they would’ve found oj guilty because it would’ve been an all white jury
Say it with me: 'the jury that acquitted O J Simpson was comprised of blacks, whites, and hispanics, and the verdict was unanimous '.
Are you saying that there are more people in other areas who believe the police never cheat, never plant evidence, never abuse, never frame people of color?
Does that make them racist? Or naive? Or indifferent? Or just unintelligent? Or all of the above?
You are forgetting that the Santa Monica grand jury did not indict him.
The film is so funny to me. I enjoyed watching it. The whole team seem like it was a game to win. Whenever things go their way they shaking hands laughing . The movie was a joy to watch. The People vs OJ Simpson. Must See! 😊 All the characters looks so much like the real.. Except Cuba, why him.? RIParad🌴e Johnnie 😘💖
He was major mismatch in character !
What a ridiculous jump to imply that a drug cartel is in the business of sending 4 man hit squads to kill their rich customers.... all of the defenses plots should have been discredited by the prosecution.
But the jury was idiots.
Yes they were...
if they do not pay, they send a team. this is one of the reasons I do not take drugs
roc, okay.... I take it you watch a lot of movies...
Agreed. Since when do cartels supply directly to users to start with? There are typically about 4 middle men between the cartel and the street level user.
Johnnie was so prepared tho. The film showed how he rearranged OJ home with his family pics , got rid of the old ones he had. He did it all for OJ. Real Lawyer, at heart for him. 💕 That's love..
not really he was getting paid 100k a month to be his lawyer he also just didnt want a L next to his name.
@@DingaDee the other lawyers (Shapiro, kardashian, etc) were also getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars but they didn’t put in the effort that Cochran did. Cochran did the extra mile
@@MC-xv2tn Cochran did what he was paid to do for his client a innocent man ❤️
@@mstineyjones422 exactly
@@mstineyjones422 Yeah he knew OJ had abandoned the black community once he got famous and knew the jury wouldn’t like that. So he had to “black his house up”
You notice how the prosecutor s seems lost and surprise and every subjects 😂