it is so precise. In the moments of love there is no thought, but our minds wander, we cannot stay in those moments completely, that's why we suffer. So simple.
tks Jiddu for reminding me what dignity means... also that there is no need to be aggressive when someone is acting like and idiot. I am so happy that you left so much wisdom..
What I love about this is how Krushnamurti answers the beginning of the questions, about he himself considering himself a great man. This would be ego, but to answer it would be ego as well. Fascinating. I feel like that's what caused the pause at the beginning, his contemplation of that statement.
Kinda like Jiddu, huh? I've seen enough of his convos to see that he is truly akin to a good friend. No judgements just love -all the while acknowledging the peculiarities of being alive in human flesh.
@@prateek_mishra.The rules or guidelines laid by Buddha were not a path to God/Creator but as a way to purify the mind, which in turn would lead one to see reality most clearly and at the end surpass the mind-matter phenomenon.
I agree, he taught philosophy. But he was a man of his time, in a country soaked in Hinduism. I think he put in just the right amount of "magic" in his teachings to make the people listen, and it worked.
Asking Buddha himself "What do you think of Buddha?". Everyone who has attained/realized oneself is Buddha. And the questioner is dividing JK & Gautama Buddha. JK is also Buddha, Buddha(Gautama) is also Buddha provided they attained/realized.
Excellent and honest reply by JK. The questioner says to JK "You consider yourself to be great". How silly!😃 What JK considers, he is saying which is a limited state of mind. How can I say or conclude what you consider about yourself unless you say it to me? But JK's reply "I don't consider myself" is mind blowing. But for JK it may be just a simple reply like any other reply. But I felt the honesty, (I want use some word, but I am not getting any) of JK. It is not planned. It is the reply of the highest intelligence, if there is any. I am honestly admitting that I did not reach that highest level because I am still involved in thinking which is a kind of lower level. What JK is at is clearly thoughtless state, however, capable of using thought as a tool to express whenever required but is not caught in thoughts.
Boom exactly. I’ve found out I stopped considering myself a year ago or so, but before that I’ve done tons of inner work most of the time without realising what I was doing. That thoughtless state can be achieved after you’ve done your part on great understanding about yourself. Otherwise one can easily confuse not giving a c*ap or being careless and obnoxious with “that” thoughtless elevated-liberating state of mind.
The immense impenetrable depth of Ks words is inexhaustible There is Supreme Intelligence Here and Now For those who wish to understand this may lead to the ultimate the beyond the Sacred
In the future, only free and total religions will survive. From those ashes, there will be Tantra and Buddhism. Or a blend between them. They are religions without a god , traditions and culture, and other abnormalities. Thank you for the short but clear video.
Great answer by Krishnamurti! Once the ego is realized to be an illusion, what is left to be called great or small? By the way, why are there different Buddhas? Once the river reaches the sea, there is only the vast ocean.
I listen to the comments and people hear but miss what he is saying here: J Krishnamurti was answering the gentleman's question directly. He does NOT THINK about the Buddha. However, he understands and Loves.... Those who can glean his meaning will understand, and those who seek validation of their Religious Beliefs will of course be disappointed. And this is how it should be, and I say this as a Buddhist practitioner and as a Buddhist Minister.
Buddha was not a religious teacher...He rediscovered the eternal law, his teachings is known as Dhamma ( The Law ) One who wishes to get rid of suffering must read about the teachings of Buddha. My Guru is Buddha JK I have a respect for you, for being yourself, thanks
Can love be measured? Our conditioning is such that our mind wants to put an image on a high pedestal, physically and/or psychologically. And we end up worshipping that image, which is the projection of our own mind.
Thank you! I made my own comment and I thank you for this. It is amazing how people are looking for him to go on and on foolishly praising the Buddha! No, the point was he loves the Buddha..... Just Beautiful!
Buddha is complete science based not religious based for the reason we remembered him now a day's also till our human community exists, whatever jiddhukrishna Murthy sir teaches thouse all comes under Buddha's methods no need to explain separately.
Budha is a term of Bodhi. Bodhi is the light. Not in ligthening meanings by mind of rennaisance. But conciousness. This consciousness was called divinity in some religion. Because that only owned by God. Sometimes also called knowing. But comon human only have a small part of this knowledge. There are many terms for these cases..
JK is always very careful not to talk about the Buddha. But he openly criticises yogi gurus. One can not criticise or blame anyone, if thought does not operate within him. some times he gets annoyed too. He is near Buddha, no doubt about it. No one can argue with JK on the subject of mind. He is super human in the subject. But sometimes he is contradicting himself, because he has not achieved Buddhahood, but has seen it fully.
@Logical Liberation I define Buddhahood as a state of human mind, the spiritual ultimatum of the human brain, and also Buddha is a human who has no “me” operating within. He may be a concept created by thought or a reality, with a more than 5000 years old history. I do not know about other gods you have mentioned, because I am one who does not believe in god or religious gurus. Buddha freed humanity from the prisons of religions & gods created by human thought. JK is doing the same thing. I heard JK once said, you should be free from the center, the “me” operating within. I have no bank account or any other worldly things in my name. I do not care what happens to me, because I have given up everything. “But still the “me’ is there within me”. That is why I said he contradicts himself sometimes. When someone says others to be free from the center, he should first be free. There is another conversation with a Buddhist monk professor, JK sometimes gets annoyed during the conversation, once the monk said “you are copying Buddha”. Clearly JK knows Buddha, he is on his path may be unconsciously, (not copying Buddha) But he always avoids the topic. But he has seen it defined it & wants to tell others what he has seen. That is why I said, I believe that he is very near Buddhahood, the human with the ultimatum of brain & mind, with no “me” operating within.
How can you really know anything you have written here? Who are you to say what state K or Buddha or anyone else is in?? You are complaining that K criticizes gurus and yet your comments are a criticism. This is the exact conflict that K has taught about for decades.
K didn't blame anyone. He just pointed to the truth and facts. What he said about yogi gurus are just pure facts. Who told you a realized being can't appear to be annoyed? How do you know if a realized being is reacting to the annoyance or not when he appears to be annoyed?Only when you are realized yourself can you know how a realized being is. Otherwise you are just claiming something you don't know.
K didn't blame anyone. He just showed the facts. What he said about the yogi gurus are just pure facts. It's not that K is always very careful not to talk about the Buddha. It's that talking about Buddha won't help people see the Truth. Buddha and K are fingers pointing to the Truth. If people focus on Buddha and K, they will be distracted from the Truth and they will never see the thing Buddha and K wanted them to see. That's what people have been doing for a few thousands years. They have been obsessed with talking about the teachers but igored what they pointed to: the truth. Buddha and K wanted people to see the Truth instead of themselves, but people have been doing the opposite. Who told you a realized being can't appear to be annoyed? Only when you are realized yourself can you know how a realized being is. Otherwise you are just saying something that you don't know.
Spanish translate / Traduccion al español.- Jiddu, queremos preguntarle algo, por supuesto usted ciertamente se considera a si mismo un muy gran hombre pero cual es su opinion del Buddha K: Te consideras a ti mismo un gran hombre sin duda Como consideras al Buddha El Buda, quien fue un maestro espiritual en el siglo 5 BC en India primero, no me considero a mi mismo del todo ni grande ni pequeño y realmente lo digo y esa es una pregunta irrelevante Cuando tu dices que pienso sobre el Buddha yo no pienso sobre el Buddha porque el pensamiento no importa en el campo del entendimiento el pensamiento no existe cuando hay amor y cuando hay amor y cuando esta alli ese estado mental y cuando no hay operacion del pensamiento no hay comparacion
Buddha was indeed a religious teacher. Dhamma means the rule of nature. If you get angry and then feel pain, doesn't matter where you are born, you will suffer.
Yes thank you for your kindness. In my opinion JK was saying that he knows the Buddha through direct Understanding & Love, which is beyond thought and comparison. Indeed, to many Buddhists want to put JK in their little box and say yeah well the Buddha said this, so we got this, which according to JK is a trap of thinking and that is what the questioner was looking for, a sort of predigested statement about how Great the Buddha was/is and JK does not relate to the Buddha in this way. He Knows & Loves the Buddha and this is enough! Again, in my opinion JK is correct and I say this as a Buddhist Minister. One Luv....
Pensamento não entra no campo do entendimento. Pensamento não existe onde há amor. E onde há amor existe esse estado mental onde Não há operação de pensamento não hácomparação.
A nice perspective on Buddha but JK seems to be on a binary path. If thought is, maybe it is not perfect love but to say there is no love seems to be too much of a stretch.
I think that JK is saying that thought is fine as far as it goes, for it deals with the known and the past but that there is understanding outside of thinking which is direct and loving. This understanding goes beyond comparison there you are totally free and loving.
I think Siddhartha Gautama had a lot of wisdom to share, a lot of knowledge but I don't trust the doctrine Buddhism has become, the infections from Christianity and their twisted truths.
But the questioner asks “what is your opinion” not “what do you think”. If he ‘does not think about’, is that the same as ‘does not have an opinion’? It sounds evasive, but maybe there was good reason to redirect an off topic question back to the topic of conversation.
A realized being doesn't have any opinion because his mind is completely still so he is unable to create an opinion from his mind. Everything that he said is just a facts which doesn't need the function of mind. If you want to show people the Sun, you just point to the Sun. The Sun is there. It's just a fact. No opinion is needed. No thought or mind is needed.
“what is your opinion” and “what do you think” is the same question. We can't form an opinion without thinking and the opinion itself is a thought. It's not evasive. What K said is just a pure fact and the fact is that ''he doesn't think about''. Not only K doesn't think about, Buddha and all realized beings don't think about. The realized beings don't have an opinion because their mind is still. The formation of an opinion needs the movement of the mind but that movement doesn't exist in the mind of the realized beings when not necessary. There won't be realizaion if the compusive thinking still exists. Everything that they said doesn't need thinking because everything they said is just a fact. If you want to show poeple the Sun, you don't need opinions or thinking to show it, you just point to the Sun and people will see it because the Sun is there and it's just a simple fact. Realized beings want people to see the facts and only the facts, but opinions are not facts so they are irrelevent.
The only problem with JK is that he draws extensively from Buddhist sources but never credits the Buddha. Even here, he calls the Buddha "a religious teacher of the 5th c. BC!" He tries as much to make everything his own. Not crediting the sources properly makes it most difficult to listen to JK.
I think he had not read any Buddha's teachings but saw the same truth independently by his own. I think he wanted people not to follow anyone but see the truth themselves
I think the only problem is the deep ignorance of your ego, not K. 1, Buddha is not the first realized being on earth. There were realized beings before Buddha and they taught the same thing as Buddha, would you say Buddha drew extensively from the realized beings before him and Buddha didn't credit them? Nobody is the source, neither Buddha nor K nor any realized being before Buddha and after Buddha is. The only source is the Truth. Nobody draws from anybody, because when Buddha and K and all other realized beings woke up, they saw the same Truth and the only Truth, because there can't be 2 Truths or multiple Truths. When different realized beings tried to show people the same Truth, some ignorant people like you think they draw from each other because they were talking about the same thing. 2, The Buddha or K didn't exist. You or I don't exist neither. To the realized beings, the saperated and divisive You or He or I or Buddha or K is just an illusion. K knows that ''he'' didn't exist and Buddha didn't exist, so nothing belongs to him or to Buddha. 3, I always see that K tried so hard not to take credit of anything. He makes me feel that he is as ordinary as myself. Where did you see he tried as much to make everything his own when It's exactly the opposite? What you say about others says more about you than them.
Such a wrong question to ask. Buddha said whoever is trying to find me in the form will not find me. And no truly realized master considers them superior to others. We first need to understand what enlightenment really means before asking such childish questions
You can't understand enlightenment. As long as mind is operating, analyzing it's not possible. Besides to understand which is infinite you've to go beyond mind
At the end u see Buddhism is also a ideology, it is non different than any abhramic religions, it has an idol, prayers, chants and images, A BELIEF on which all bhuddhist cores is based, it is an organised religion with all its dogmas and scriptures with limited knowledge as any book that is/was written will always be limited in the end
If there is no comparison for him how does he know the question is irrelevant? As compared to a relevant one? He never ended the image. He is a charlatan.
when he tells him that he considers himself a great man, he makes a comparison between small and great men and that for K does not make sense because it is the product of thought
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
Thought doesn’t exist where Love is. Wow
There you go , you're thinking again.
What does it mean?
it is so precise. In the moments of love there is no thought, but our minds wander, we cannot stay in those moments completely, that's why we suffer. So simple.
Either no thought or too many thoughts haha get it?
What you call love is not love. What he has seen what love is not what you've seen.
He summed up all the essence of his teachings in less that one minute, what a beautiful extract !
What a man!I have never seen anyone like him.❤❤❤
he was beyond the human mind and imagination 🔥💗 his each word describes the new!
This man is rare! Very rare! If one really wants to understand him.. One has to raise the level of understanding to the heights of peaks!!
He said if you want to understand me, understand yourself
Absolutely
_”You consider yourself to be a very great man”_ K- *_jumps!_*
🤣
tks Jiddu for reminding me what dignity means... also that there is no need to be aggressive when someone is acting like and idiot. I am so happy that you left so much wisdom..
"I don't consider myself at all, neither great nor small."
What I love about this is how Krushnamurti answers the beginning of the questions, about he himself considering himself a great man. This would be ego, but to answer it would be ego as well. Fascinating. I feel like that's what caused the pause at the beginning, his contemplation of that statement.
Buddha wasn't a religious teacher. Actually we made him as a religious teacher.
Kinda like Jiddu, huh? I've seen enough of his convos to see that he is truly akin to a good friend. No judgements just love -all the while acknowledging the peculiarities of being alive in human flesh.
Buddha taught the Dhamma (truth) for 45 years.
@@prateek_mishra. “lead a way to god” - no, there is no divine creator god or supreme being in the Buddhist teachings.
@@prateek_mishra.The rules or guidelines laid by Buddha were not a path to God/Creator but as a way to purify the mind, which in turn would lead one to see reality most clearly and at the end surpass the mind-matter phenomenon.
I agree, he taught philosophy. But he was a man of his time, in a country soaked in Hinduism. I think he put in just the right amount of "magic" in his teachings to make the people listen, and it worked.
Asking Buddha himself "What do you think of Buddha?". Everyone who has attained/realized oneself is Buddha. And the questioner is dividing JK & Gautama Buddha. JK is also Buddha, Buddha(Gautama) is also Buddha provided they attained/realized.
How do you know he is Buddha? Terrible obsequiousness.
@@International-indic. how do you know that siddhartha gautama was buddha ? because texts claim ? terrible obsequiousness
@@rggrrggr290 he told so
Buddha resides in humans. Gautama wasnt the only buddha. Buddhism in its earliest form wasnt a religion. @@International-indic.
This is precisely expounding why he himself summed up his message to... "Live a life without comparison."
Love is greater than the Buddha himself. The vehicle is not important, but what it carries. 🎉🎉❤❤❤
Thank you so much for taking the time to upload these and to find the great cuts!
Thought doesn't enter into the field of understanding.. Thought doesn't exist where love is.
Yeah, the question was pretty rude, and Krishnamurti answered it perfectly.
Beautiful 👌❤️ I don't know how many times I am going to watch this. This is love this is joy this peace 🙏🌹
What a great man! What a great answer! The more i listen him more my brain expands thoughts mature. Love you JK
Thoughts do not mature. That's the point. And the brain may expand, but the brain will never bring the mind to clarity.
O my! What a response! What an explanation! Only the 'greats' can truly feel this way.
Excellent and honest reply by JK.
The questioner says to JK "You consider yourself to be great". How silly!😃 What JK considers, he is saying which is a limited state of mind. How can I say or conclude what you consider about yourself unless you say it to me? But JK's reply "I don't consider myself" is mind blowing. But for JK it may be just a simple reply like any other reply. But I felt the honesty, (I want use some word, but I am not getting any) of JK. It is not planned. It is the reply of the highest intelligence, if there is any. I am honestly admitting that I did not reach that highest level because I am still involved in thinking which is a kind of lower level. What JK is at is clearly thoughtless state, however, capable of using thought as a tool to express whenever required but is not caught in thoughts.
Boom exactly.
I’ve found out I stopped considering myself a year ago or so, but before that I’ve done tons of inner work most of the time without realising what I was doing.
That thoughtless state can be achieved after you’ve done your part on great understanding about yourself. Otherwise one can easily confuse not giving a c*ap or being careless and obnoxious with “that” thoughtless elevated-liberating state of mind.
When there is comparison, there is violence.
Thanks!
Thank you very much for your generosity
@@kft Very much appreciate your work and making it available. Thanks.
The immense impenetrable depth of Ks words is inexhaustible There is Supreme Intelligence Here and Now For those who wish to understand this may lead to the ultimate the beyond the Sacred
Live life without compare!!!
Buddha was a social reformer who gave teachings, and we made a religion out of him...
In the future, only free and total religions will survive. From those ashes, there will be Tantra and Buddhism. Or a blend between them. They are religions without a god , traditions and culture, and other abnormalities. Thank you for the short but clear video.
'I don't think about the Buddha"- sums up it all. By implication,he suggests never think about anyone in the world.
The same was said by Buddha. No comparison between Ganga river and and any other rivers when they reach to indian ocean.
Great answer by Krishnamurti! Once the ego is realized to be an illusion, what is left to be called great or small? By the way, why are there different Buddhas? Once the river reaches the sea, there is only the vast ocean.
So SO profound ! 🥰
I listen to the comments and people hear but miss what he is saying here:
J Krishnamurti was answering the gentleman's question directly.
He does NOT THINK about the Buddha.
However, he understands and Loves....
Those who can glean his meaning will understand, and those who seek validation of their Religious Beliefs will of course be disappointed.
And this is how it should be, and I say this as a Buddhist practitioner and as a Buddhist Minister.
What an answer ! 👌👏👏👏❤❤
Would have dropped the mic in the end..if he was using one. Huge respect. Feel pity for the laughing crowd silenceed in the end.
Wow!!! Incredible.
Beyond thoughts and desires 🙏👑🤍
beautiful as always
¡Gracias!
Thank you for your generous support
Buddha was not a religious teacher...He rediscovered the eternal law, his teachings is known as Dhamma ( The Law )
One who wishes to get rid of suffering must read about the teachings of Buddha.
My Guru is Buddha
JK I have a respect for you, for being yourself, thanks
the humor of jk is underrated
perfect answer
calm man with ckear ideas
Can love be measured? Our conditioning is such that our mind wants to put an image on a high pedestal, physically and/or psychologically. And we end up worshipping that image, which is the projection of our own mind.
What an answer!
Meaning where there is love there is no thought, it means you do not think about Buddha, it means you love him
Buddha is what gets repeated by every teacher. Nothing new after The Buddha. Without taught you cannot speak. Being in love is also a thought. 😊
JK was saying that he loves Buddha
Thank you!
I made my own comment and I thank you for this. It is amazing how people are looking for him to go on and on foolishly praising the Buddha!
No, the point was he loves the Buddha.....
Just Beautiful!
Grazie.
Thank you for your support
Buddha is complete science based not religious based for the reason we remembered him now a day's also till our human community exists, whatever jiddhukrishna Murthy sir teaches thouse all comes under Buddha's methods no need to explain separately.
Great 🙏🙏🙏🙏
You can't compare thoughts without using your Mind and so comparison will make you confuse.
Thats how it is simple!
He's Buddha ❤
❤❤❤
No he is k.
Buddha means beyond the mind
Thought doesn't enter into the field of understanding.
I don't think about budda when you read Buddha's teachings you'll realise why jk uttered those words, it striked me hard!!
Thought doesn’t enter field of understanding!
Budha is a term of Bodhi. Bodhi is the light. Not in ligthening meanings by mind of rennaisance. But conciousness. This consciousness was called divinity in some religion. Because that only owned by God. Sometimes also called knowing. But comon human only have a small part of this knowledge. There are many terms for these cases..
Thought require for daily life, how you will purchase vegetables, clothes without comparing?
Buddha himself would agree with these words.
I think so too!
The Buddha would be so happy to have someone to truly Understand him..... with Love....
this man is very useful how to you consideration
Thought doesn't enter into the field of understanding.
JK is always very careful not to talk about the Buddha. But he openly criticises yogi gurus. One can not criticise or blame anyone, if thought does not operate within him. some times he gets annoyed too. He is near Buddha, no doubt about it. No one can argue with JK on the subject of mind. He is super human in the subject. But sometimes he is contradicting himself, because he has not achieved Buddhahood, but has seen it fully.
@Logical Liberation I define Buddhahood as a state of human mind, the spiritual ultimatum of the human brain, and also Buddha is a human who has no “me” operating within. He may be a concept created by thought or a reality, with a more than 5000 years old history. I do not know about other gods you have mentioned, because I am one who does not believe in god or religious gurus. Buddha freed humanity from the prisons of religions & gods created by human thought. JK is doing the same thing. I heard JK once said, you should be free from the center, the “me” operating within. I have no bank account or any other worldly things in my name. I do not care what happens to me, because I have given up everything. “But still the “me’ is there within me”. That is why I said he contradicts himself sometimes. When someone says others to be free from the center, he should first be free. There is another conversation with a Buddhist monk professor, JK sometimes gets annoyed during the conversation, once the monk said “you are copying Buddha”. Clearly JK knows Buddha, he is on his path may be unconsciously, (not copying Buddha) But he always avoids the topic. But he has seen it defined it & wants to tell others what he has seen. That is why I said, I believe that he is very near Buddhahood, the human with the ultimatum of brain & mind, with no “me” operating within.
How can you really know anything you have written here? Who are you to say what state K or Buddha or anyone else is in?? You are complaining that K criticizes gurus and yet your comments are a criticism. This is the exact conflict that K has taught about for decades.
How do you know about this, has Buddha or jk come into your dream. It nothing but a assumption and imposition of your thoughts to strengthen your ego
K didn't blame anyone. He just pointed to the truth and facts. What he said about yogi gurus are just pure facts.
Who told you a realized being can't appear to be annoyed? How do you know if a realized being is reacting to the annoyance or not when he appears to be annoyed?Only when you are realized yourself can you know how a realized being is. Otherwise you are just claiming something you don't know.
K didn't blame anyone. He just showed the facts. What he said about the yogi gurus are just pure facts.
It's not that K is always very careful not to talk about the Buddha. It's that talking about Buddha won't help people see the Truth. Buddha and K are fingers pointing to the Truth. If people focus on Buddha and K, they will be distracted from the Truth and they will never see the thing Buddha and K wanted them to see. That's what people have been doing for a few thousands years. They have been obsessed with talking about the teachers but igored what they pointed to: the truth. Buddha and K wanted people to see the Truth instead of themselves, but people have been doing the opposite.
Who told you a realized being can't appear to be annoyed? Only when you are realized yourself can you know how a realized being is. Otherwise you are just saying something that you don't know.
“You certainly consider yourself a great man”
No, silly 😂 That’s your own conclusion based on your own thoughts.
❤❤❤
🔥🔥🔥
We know j, you love buddha bcz of him you were here
🙏
BOOM!
Who got it...
Spanish translate / Traduccion al español.-
Jiddu, queremos preguntarle algo, por supuesto
usted ciertamente se considera a si mismo
un muy gran hombre
pero cual es su opinion del Buddha
K:
Te consideras a ti mismo un gran hombre
sin duda
Como consideras al Buddha
El Buda, quien fue un maestro espiritual
en el siglo 5 BC en India
primero, no me considero a mi mismo
del todo ni grande ni pequeño
y realmente lo digo
y esa es una pregunta irrelevante
Cuando tu dices que pienso sobre el Buddha
yo no pienso sobre el Buddha
porque el pensamiento no importa en el campo
del entendimiento
el pensamiento no existe
cuando hay amor
y cuando hay amor
y cuando esta alli ese estado mental
y cuando no hay operacion del pensamiento
no hay comparacion
He himself was incarnation of buddha, so that question is irrelevant 🙏 , don't believe me
00:07 🤣🤣
❤️🙏🏻✨
Buddha was indeed a religious teacher. Dhamma means the rule of nature. If you get angry and then feel pain, doesn't matter where you are born, you will suffer.
❤️
What does it mean can someone explain?
Yes thank you for your kindness.
In my opinion JK was saying that he knows the Buddha through direct Understanding & Love, which is beyond thought and comparison.
Indeed, to many Buddhists want to put JK in their little box and say yeah well the Buddha said this, so we got this, which according to JK is a trap of thinking and that is what the questioner was looking for, a sort of predigested statement about how Great the Buddha was/is and JK does not relate to the Buddha in this way.
He Knows & Loves the Buddha and this is enough!
Again, in my opinion JK is correct and I say this as a Buddhist Minister.
One Luv....
👌♥️
Buddha was born in 1900 BC.
Pensamento não entra no campo do entendimento.
Pensamento não existe onde há amor.
E onde há amor existe esse estado mental onde Não há operação de pensamento não hácomparação.
when ignorance collides with intelligence, a wave of silence fills the room
A nice perspective on Buddha but JK seems to be on a binary path. If thought is, maybe it is not perfect love but to say there is no love seems to be too much of a stretch.
I think that JK is saying that thought is fine as far as it goes, for it deals with the known and the past but that there is understanding outside of thinking which is direct and loving. This understanding goes beyond comparison there you are totally free and loving.
I think Siddhartha Gautama had a lot of wisdom to share, a lot of knowledge but I don't trust the doctrine Buddhism has become, the infections from Christianity and their twisted truths.
My Guru🙏🙏 Took me from darkness to light
And once again Krishna drops the mic
Does anyon know who is the questioner
But the questioner asks “what is your opinion” not “what do you think”. If he ‘does not think about’, is that the same as ‘does not have an opinion’? It sounds evasive, but maybe there was good reason to redirect an off topic question back to the topic of conversation.
A realized being doesn't have any opinion because his mind is completely still so he is unable to create an opinion from his mind. Everything that he said is just a facts which doesn't need the function of mind. If you want to show people the Sun, you just point to the Sun. The Sun is there. It's just a fact. No opinion is needed. No thought or mind is needed.
“what is your opinion” and “what do you think” is the same question. We can't form an opinion without thinking and the opinion itself is a thought.
It's not evasive. What K said is just a pure fact and the fact is that ''he doesn't think about''. Not only K doesn't think about, Buddha and all realized beings don't think about. The realized beings don't have an opinion because their mind is still. The formation of an opinion needs the movement of the mind but that movement doesn't exist in the mind of the realized beings when not necessary. There won't be realizaion if the compusive thinking still exists. Everything that they said doesn't need thinking because everything they said is just a fact. If you want to show poeple the Sun, you don't need opinions or thinking to show it, you just point to the Sun and people will see it because the Sun is there and it's just a simple fact. Realized beings want people to see the facts and only the facts, but opinions are not facts so they are irrelevent.
Nonsense damn near eternal too
🌹🤍
Thought that was Buddha speaking! Lol...
So he's saying he loves the Buddha!
without thought only love exist.that means he loves buddha.but without his thought he doesnot exist only love exist.
The only problem with JK is that he draws extensively from Buddhist sources but never credits the Buddha. Even here, he calls the Buddha "a religious teacher of the 5th c. BC!" He tries as much to make everything his own. Not crediting the sources properly makes it most difficult to listen to JK.
I think he had not read any Buddha's teachings but saw the same truth independently by his own. I think he wanted people not to follow anyone but see the truth themselves
I think the only problem is the deep ignorance of your ego, not K.
1, Buddha is not the first realized being on earth. There were realized beings before Buddha and they taught the same thing as Buddha, would you say Buddha drew extensively from the realized beings before him and Buddha didn't credit them? Nobody is the source, neither Buddha nor K nor any realized being before Buddha and after Buddha is. The only source is the Truth. Nobody draws from anybody, because when Buddha and K and all other realized beings woke up, they saw the same Truth and the only Truth, because there can't be 2 Truths or multiple Truths. When different realized beings tried to show people the same Truth, some ignorant people like you think they draw from each other because they were talking about the same thing.
2, The Buddha or K didn't exist. You or I don't exist neither. To the realized beings, the saperated and divisive You or He or I or Buddha or K is just an illusion. K knows that ''he'' didn't exist and Buddha didn't exist, so nothing belongs to him or to Buddha.
3, I always see that K tried so hard not to take credit of anything. He makes me feel that he is as ordinary as myself. Where did you see he tried as much to make everything his own when It's exactly the opposite? What you say about others says more about you than them.
Truth is Truth, one need not read the Buddha to find it.
Does he feel something about the Buddha?
Why am I having hard time understanding JK.
Such a wrong question to ask. Buddha said whoever is trying to find me in the form will not find me. And no truly realized master considers them superior to others. We first need to understand what enlightenment really means before asking such childish questions
You can't understand enlightenment. As long as mind is operating, analyzing it's not possible. Besides to understand which is infinite you've to go beyond mind
Have you understood the enlightenment?
Nice 😅
Buddha is far more greater than jk 😜😜
That's it sir, you missed the whole point.
At the end u see Buddhism is also a ideology, it is non different than any abhramic religions, it has an idol, prayers, chants and images, A BELIEF on which all bhuddhist cores is based, it is an organised religion with all its dogmas and scriptures with limited knowledge as any book that is/was written will always be limited in the end
@@tugwar Unfortunately, you are right. Too many Buddhists make this error, and I am a Buddhist.
If there is no comparison for him how does he know the question is irrelevant? As compared to a relevant one? He never ended the image. He is a charlatan.
who said anything about comparison?
The preface of the question invites a comparison.
when he tells him that he considers himself a great man, he makes a comparison between small and great men and that for K does not make sense because it is the product of thought
Thinking= measuring= comparing
Buddha was not a man or a historical person
Irrational understanding. Religious and spiritual are being distracted.
Thanks!
Thank you for your support