She did it without parental or guardian consent...which is against HIPAA law regarding minors. It doesn't matter if she gave identifying information or not.
what a sad world women live in. poor 10 year old. caring more about rapists and misogynistic law makers than the safety and rights of younger girls and women. disgusting.
All they have to do is follow the law. This doctor spoke about the case without parental or guardian consent..which is against HIPAA law regarding minors. The child could have received an abortion in her own state which has exceptions for rape, incest and mothers health.
@@jenntip A rape victim could still be in danger after the rape. When a child is about to go through the worst times of her life because of idiots who know nothing about the female body doctors are obviously going to help her first. And not to mention what if the parents didn't consent?? Is she just supposed to let a 10 year old die??
She didn't lose her license. She spoke about the case publicly without parental or guardian consent...which is against HIPAA law regarding minors. She was fined 3k.
@@hp2474 yes I saw that this morning. They were there very late last night. I’m glad she didn’t lose her license. She could have they could’ve taken it away but the thing and understand she never said the child’s name so I don’t know how that could go against HIPAA laws, but I understand HIPAA laws. Thanks for this appreciate you guys answering back and being civil about it.
I wish President Biden would give Dr Dr. Caitlin Bernard the Presidential Medal of Freedom- it would make a strong resounding statement for women's rights, health, self-determination, progress- no matter what this Indiana board decides- she is a true dr, advocate and hero
Abortion isn't wrong even if the victim wasn't raped. The fetus doesn't have life, it's not equal to a living person. Even if you have your "exceptions" in your mind, your still voting for raped children to die
She never named the patient nor disclosed identifying information to anyone who didn't have a right (ie., she gave the records to the state as required). So the HIPPA claim never enters in since the only stuff she otherwise disclosed was age of patient, procedure and general condition. Those aren't protected items. You can, in fact, as for the number of people under 19, for example, that had appendectomies or splenectomies last month from any hospital. And YES, doctors discuss cases all the time, without identifying info. That's allowed.
Stop trying to shame others for speaking out. You aren't the gatekeeper for activism. In the meantime, I'd do some research on how to use quotation marks.
@@bodbnhe does read the fine print and you know that well she’s a physician-and you’re not!! Go back to your hole in ur mom’s basement you no life no future 😂😂😂😂
She gave no identifying information. Countless doctors have done the same.
She did it without parental or guardian consent...which is against HIPAA law regarding minors. It doesn't matter if she gave identifying information or not.
what a sad world women live in. poor 10 year old. caring more about rapists and misogynistic law makers than the safety and rights of younger girls and women. disgusting.
OB Doctors are stuck between a rock and hard place. I would expect this hell in places like Afghanistan or Iran, not in the USA, but here we are.
All they have to do is follow the law.
This doctor spoke about the case without parental or guardian consent..which is against HIPAA law regarding minors.
The child could have received an abortion in her own state which has exceptions for rape, incest and mothers health.
@@jenntip A rape victim could still be in danger after the rape. When a child is about to go through the worst times of her life because of idiots who know nothing about the female body doctors are obviously going to help her first.
And not to mention what if the parents didn't consent?? Is she just supposed to let a 10 year old die??
@@purple7259 This has nothing to do with the abortion…it’s the fact that she spoke about it without parental/ guardian consent.
@@jenntip Parental consent shouldn't matter when the child's life is on the line. There's a reason why the child didn't tell the parents herself
@@purple7259 What part of this has nothing to do with the abortion you don’t understand?!?
She did nothing wrong.
No good deed goes unpunished in these political times.
This is bullshit. She shouldn’t lose her license.
She didn’t lose her license. But she was reprimanded and fined which is BS
She didn't lose her license.
She spoke about the case publicly without parental or guardian consent...which is against HIPAA law regarding minors.
She was fined 3k.
@@hp2474 yes I saw that this morning. They were there very late last night. I’m glad she didn’t lose her license. She could have they could’ve taken it away but the thing and understand she never said the child’s name so I don’t know how that could go against HIPAA laws, but I understand HIPAA laws. Thanks for this appreciate you guys answering back and being civil about it.
And you guys thought that those cowards would decide before your news hour.
I wish President Biden would give Dr Dr. Caitlin Bernard the Presidential Medal of Freedom- it would make a strong resounding statement for women's rights, health, self-determination, progress- no matter what this Indiana board decides- she is a true dr, advocate and hero
I am against abortion but in this case it's needed.
Abortion isn't wrong even if the victim wasn't raped. The fetus doesn't have life, it's not equal to a living person. Even if you have your "exceptions" in your mind, your still voting for raped children to die
She should have her license removed. Period. I will not respond to your emotional illogical replies.
For what
I am praying for you.Hopefully you can work as social worker or rn.
She only spoke out because she wanted to show her 'activism'. It should have been a private matter.
Stupid texas offering bounty rewards on suppressing womens rights is going to make it worse as time goes on.
She never named the patient nor disclosed identifying information to anyone who didn't have a right (ie., she gave the records to the state as required).
So the HIPPA claim never enters in since the only stuff she otherwise disclosed was age of patient, procedure and general condition. Those aren't protected items.
You can, in fact, as for the number of people under 19, for example, that had appendectomies or splenectomies last month from any hospital. And YES, doctors discuss cases all the time, without identifying info. That's allowed.
@@PhrontDoor Exactly correct
The government turned it into a public matter when they decided to put themselves between a patient and their doctor, didn't they?
Stop trying to shame others for speaking out. You aren't the gatekeeper for activism. In the meantime, I'd do some research on how to use quotation marks.
She did her job, she took an oath, period.
Apparently she didn't read the fine print. Hopefully she learns her lesson.
@@bodbn Hopefully you get some common sense and learn forcing a child to give birth is murder
@@bodbnhe does read the fine print and you know that well she’s a physician-and you’re not!! Go back to your hole in ur mom’s basement you no life no future 😂😂😂😂